ﻣﺠﻤﻮﻋﺔ اﻟﮭﯿﺪروﻟﻮﺟﯿﯿﻦ اﻟﻔﻠﺴﻄﯿﻨﯿﯿﻦ ﻟﺘﻄﻮﯾﺮ ﻣﺼﺎدر اﻟﻤﯿﺎه واﻟﺒﯿﺌﺔ

PALESTINIAN HYDROLOGY GROUP “PHG”

DEEP PREPARATION AND IMPROVED RESPONSE CAPACITY TO ADDRESS THE WATER SHORTAGES AFFECTING PALESTINIAN COMMUNITIES IN THE THROUGH INCREASED EFFECTIVENESS OF CIVIL SOCIETY PARTICIPATION AND INSTITUTIONS IN THE COORDINATION AND MONITORING OF WATER RESOURCES, WATER AND SANITATION.

Phase 2

FINAL REPORT

March 2019

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 1

Prepared & Written by:

Project and Team Leader: Dr. Ayman Rabi

Project Coordinator: Eng. Abdulrauf Aburahma

GIS and Database Manager: Abdallah Abdelrazeq

Field Survey Team: Sahira Gh. Kusa Joudeh Abdelaziz

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 2

Table of Contents:

TABLES OF FIGURES ...... 4 Acronyms ...... 5 Executive Summary ...... 6 I: Background ...... 9 II: Methodology ...... 11 1. Selecting the Target Communities ...... 11 2. Creation of a coordination group ...... 11 3. Data collection tools on water and sanitation ...... 11 4. Data Base Design ...... 11 5. Data processing, analysis and storage into the database ...... 11 6. Data dissemination and accessibility ...... 11 III: Availability and Accessibility to Water and Sanitation in ...... 13 1. Water Resources:...... 13 2. Water Supply Quantity and Service Coverage ...... 14 3. Wastewater Situation ...... 15 4. Water Governance ...... 16 IV: Major Findings of the WASH Situation in the 55 Communities and Proposed Response ...... 18 1. Introduction...... 18 2. Water Supply Quantity and Quality ...... 18 3. Water Service Condition and Reliability...... 19 4. Wastewater and Solidwaste Serivce Conditions ...... 23 5. Gender and Water ...... 24 6. Major WASH Needs ...... 24 APPENDIXES ...... 29 APPENDIX–A: Surveyed Communities ...... 30 APPENDIX–B: Questionnaire ………………………………………………………………………… 33 APPENDIX–C: Tables and Maps ...... 36

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 3

TABLES OF FIGURES

Figure1: Service coverage in both West Bank and Gaza ...... 15 Figure 2:Volume of treated effluent that flows west and east and its treatment condition ...... 16 Figure 3: Supplied versus needed water quantities...... 18 Figure 4: Supply and needs of each community ...... 19 Figure 5: Monthly Water Supply Frequency ...... 20 Figure 6: Water Pressure in the Network ...... 20 Figure 7: Comparing water price from network versus tankers...... 21 Figure 8: Per capita daily water use ...... 21 Figure 9: Water Losses ...... 22 Figure 10: Access to Water and Sanitation ...... 22 Figure 11: Water Network coverage ...... 23 Figure 12: Solid Waste Disposal ...... 23 Figure 13: Geneder Representation in WASH ...... 24

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 4

Acronyms

ACPP Asamblea de Cooperacio’n por la Paz CA Civil Administration CM Cubic Meters (m2) CMWU Coastal Municipalities Water Utility EPA United States Environmental Protection Agency GS Gaza Strip GDP Gross Domestic Product ICJ International Court of Justice ICRC International Committee of the Red Cross INGOs International Non-governmental Organizations JWC Joint Water Committee JWU Water Undertaking LCD Litres per capita per day M&A Movement and Access MAS Palestinian Economic Policy Research Institute MCM Million Cubic Meters MoA Ministry of Agriculture MoH Ministry of Health NGO Non-governmental Organization NIS New Israeli Shekel NSU Negotiations Support Unit NWC National Water Council OCHA Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs OPt Occupied Palestinian Territory PA or PNA Palestinian National Authority PCBS Palestinian Central Bureau of Statistics PHG Palestinian Hydrology Group PWA Palestinian Water Authority UNDP United Nations Development Program UNICEF United Nations Children's Fund UNRWA United Nations Relief and Works Agency USAID United States Agency for International Development WaSH Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene WaSH MP Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene Monitoring Program WBGS West Bank and Gaza Strip WBWD West Bank Water Department WHO World Health Organization

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 5

Executive Summary

Water availability and access to the Palestinian communities have deteriorated over the past decade due to increased Israeli restriction and policies that limited the Palestinian ability from developing and managing their water resources properly. Since the signature of Oslo Interim Agreement back in 1995, water made available to has dropped by 14 MCM, it was 118 MCM at the time of signature, the figure that was also agreed in the interim agreement to nearly 104 MCM in 2015. This reduction combined with other Israeli policies have influenced the supply quantities from Palestinian local water resources as well as limited per capita water use to vary from 70 l/day in the best cases to as low as 20l/d in the marginal communities and increased the reliance of Palestinians to the purchased water from Israeli company making their water security very law and bound to the Israeli merit.

Moreover, poor services related to water supply and limitation on physical infrastructure for both water and wastewater have left nearly 68% of the population in the West Bank not served with wastewater collection and treatment systems.

Despite all the efforts made by the Palestinian Government to coup with this difficult situation including sector reform, adopting a new water law and developing long and short term strategies, the water and sanitation situation remains fragile since the final say is within the Israeli hands and subject to their approval. This situation clearly tells that ending Israeli occupation is a prerequisite for Palestinians to be able develop and prosper and assuming full sovereignty over their land and natural resources.

Under these circumstances the current project titled "Deep preparation and improved response capacity to address the water shortages affecting Palestinian communities in the West Bank through increased effectiveness of civil society participation and institutions in the coordination and monitoring of water resources, water and sanitation" funded by Ayuntamient de Valancia (in year 2017 - 2018) through Asamblea de Cooperación por la Paz (ACPP) and implemented by Palestinian Hydrology Group (PHG), tried to assess the water and sanitation situation in 55 communities in the West Bank to highlight the main obstacles and to propose appropriate response that could address these obstacles through providing updated and standardized information to all agencies working in the WASH sector in Palestine. The project aims to improve the living conditions of the people of the West Bank through the availability of harmonized, up-to-date, complete and reliable data on access to water, resulting in better and more effective interventions in development cooperation and humanitarian aid projects. The project also aims to improve coordination and responsiveness between these actors, both governmental and international agencies, international and Palestinian organizations working in the water and sanitation sector in the West Bank, in the Occupied Palestinian Territory (OPT).

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 6

For this, the designed strategy consists of the following axes: - Joint management of the project through the coordination and harmonization of data monitoring group, which is made up of technicians from ACPP, PHG, the Palestinian Water Authority (PWA), the United Nations WASH Cluster (led by UNICEF) and Civil Society Organizations through the EWASH platform. - Strengthen coordination and harmonize mechanisms for the study and dissemination of data on access and water quality among WASH sector development actors through the monitoring and harmonization of tools, gender training and the creation and presentation of the specific harmonized tool for data collection. - Implementation, systematization and presentation of a detailed, community-level, gender- sensitive study on access to quality water in 55 vulnerable communities. - Strengthen the responsiveness of Palestinian civil society organizations and their institutions, and their capacity to coordinate with other international actors in the WASH sector, through constant updating of information, establishment of a mechanism for actors to coordinate and training in the management of harmonized tools.

The survey has been implemented in 55 communities in Qalqilia, and Bani Zaid. So a questionnaire has been designed to collect information from the targeted communities (see attached). Data collected from communities was then checked and verified and then entered into special data base that was designed specifically for the project. Data then has been analysed and presented in the final report. The data collected is stored at the data base. Moreover, the data base is accessible to all interested stakeholders through web site, www.phg.org/wash-mp/.

The main findings of the project reflects that water accessibility and availability in the 55 communities are no better than overall situation in the West Bank and Gaza. Three communities are totally isolated by the wall, and more than 40% of the residents of 18 communities are living in . Water quality is not good in 11 communities. Water losses in 23 communities are more than 20%. Water supplied to the 50% of the surveyed communities accounts for 80% of their needs during summer period. Moreover, the assessment shows that water service reliability varies from one communitiy to the other. It was realized that water frequency in summer is not sufficient in 16 communities, while 29 communities reported that water pressure in summer is not adequate. Moreover, average per capita water use varies among the 55 communities. It varies from 40 to 130 litre per capita per day, with 94 weighted average. In the mean time, water price per cubic meter in the network varies from 1 - 10 NIS (80% of the surveyed communities water price varies from 3 to 5.6 NIS), while water tankers prices varies from 10 to 35 NIS/m3.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 7

The current survey has delineated a section on gender role in water management and use. 17% of the interviewee were females. 15.5% of the LC members participated in in decision making related to WaSH are females, while 24% of the persons contacting LC for WaSH issues are wowmen. Finally 11.4% of water sections staff are women.

It was concluded that communities need more interventions to increase water quantity available and improve existing water infrastructure including rehabilitation of existing water networks and reservoirs as well as improve water supply frequency and reliability and improvement of water billing. In addition, raising awareness of communities toward water conservation.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 8

I: Background

The current report has been prepared under the project titled "Deep preparation and improved response capacity to address the water shortages affecting Palestinian communities in the West Bank through increased effectiveness of civil society participation and institutions in the coordination and monitoring of water resources, water and sanitation" funded by Ajuntament de Valancia through Asamblea de Cooperación por la Paz (ACPP) and implemented by Palestinian Hydrology Group (PHG). The main objective of the project is to improve the living conditions of the population of the West Bank, Occupied Palestinian Territory, which suffers from a chronic water shortage by the improvement of the preparation and response capacity of national and International actors to deal with this crisis. In the mean time the specific objective is to improve the preparation and response capacity to deal with the water shortage crisis affecting Palestinian communities in the West Bank through a more effective participation of civil society in the coordination and monitoring of water resources and sanitation. The project specifically aims at:

- Reinforce the coordination between the different agents who work in the WASH sector in the Palestinian communities in West Bank. - Drive a harmonized mechanism to lead a study on the access to water for Palestinian communities in the West Bank. - Improve the response capacity of the different actors to achieve a higher impact of the projects. This project is linked to the WaSH Monitoring Program that PHG has initiated in June 2002 in response to the urgent need for increased information, resources and action related to the water crisis in Palestine which resultedfrom the Israeli reoccupation of major Palestinian cities and towns during the . The need for quantitative data to support ongoing advocacy and programming by NGOs working on the implementation of WASH related activities to fulfil the UN General Assembly resolution number GA/10967 which adopted access to clean water and sanitation as a human right, has been a primary force behind the initiation and development of the WaSH MP. The main objective of the WaSH MP is to facilitate timely and effective responses to grave WaSH related problems arising from the Israeli occupation through the collection and dissemination of up-to- date information.The WaSH MP operates with the understanding that the Israeli occupation is at the core cause of the water and sanitation crisis in Palestine. While it is clear that a final solution can only lie in the end of Israeli occupation, the WaSH MP has identified the following goals:

 To promote awareness, mobilization, lobbying/advocacy and communication in response to the WaSH crisis in Palestine.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 9

 To identify and challenge conditions of the Israeli occupation which directly affects the WaSH situation in Palestine. Since its initiation in 2002, the WASH MP has produced five annual reports which summarized the WASH status in both West Bank and Gaza and also reported all the information gathered on the communities in a web based data base and made accessible to all stakeholders under the following link: (www.phg.org/wash-mp/). The current funds by Ayuntamiento de Valencia have enabled us to renew and updatee the WASH information to contribute to accurate planning and respondto the water scarcity and crisis in the West Bank. In this respect and to ensure effective dissemination of data and reach wider audience, PHG presents the collected data and produced final report under this project in the above mentioned WASH Monitoring web site. .

The current report summarizes the WASH situation in 55 communities as shown in APPENDIX A. It also summarizes the main WASH challenges and problems facing these communities as well as the main WASH needs to overcome these problems for each community.

It is hoped that the information in this report will be used by any and all related organizations and institutions in aiding efforts for advocacy and actions that not only demand an end to the occupation, but strive for the implementation of water as a fundamental human right for all.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 10

II: Methodology

To realize the project objective and to ensure adequate and reliable information gathering on the WASH situation in the target communities, PHG has adopted the following methodology:

1. Selecting the Target Communities PHG and ACPP have selected 55 communities at Qalqilia and Salfit Governorates in addition to Bani Zaid in .

2. Creation of a coordination group The coordination group consisting of representatives from Palestinian Water Authority (PWA), ACPP, PHG and WASH cluster have been consulted throughout the project implementation. The main role of the coordination group is to follow up on the progress and to eliminate duplication and ensures integration and harmonization of WASH related information within the central PWA data base. Moreover, to assist in disseminating of results to various relevant stakeholders.

3. Data collection tools on water and sanitation Te ensure reliable data collection, a questionnaire has been designed in coordination with PWA and WaSH Cluster members to collect data at community level.

The community questionnaire was filled by the project field assistants through interviewing representatives of local councils. PHG project team has made all efoorts possible to make a balanced interview between male and female interviewees in the Local Councils. Moreover, the data that has been given by the representatives of village councils (male and female) has been also verified from other informants in the community sometime clinic or other stakeholders to ensure consisteency. In the mean time, the figures related to water supply were obtained from the bulk water invoices that were obtained from the village council.

4. Data Base Design Based on the information presented at the questionnaires, a data base was designed using Access software. The data base is being used for further analysis and linkages.

5. Data processing, analysis and storage into the database Collected data after being verified and cross checked by data base manager have been entered into the Access data base. Data processing and analysis were then conducted and main issues related to the WASH situation in the target communities have been defined.

6. Data dissemination and accessibility The main findings of the assessment are disseminated widely through number of means that include:

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 11

 Website has been redesigned and the data base is presented and shared through the Website where all information are made accessible to all relevant stakeholders.  Workshop has been organized to all wash related agencies working in Palestine and results of the assessment have been disseminated.  Final annual report has been produced where analysis of the data, the results, the challenges and main community needs have been presented. Hard copies have been made available to all wash agencies and soft copy has been presented in the website www.phg.org/wash-mp/.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 12

III: Availability and Accessibility to Water and Sanitation in Palestine

1. Water Resources:

The magnitude of groundwater resources in the West Bank is nearly 672 MCM distributed in three major groundwater basins in the West Bank, Western, North-eastern and Eastern Basins with replenishment capacities of 362 MCM, 145 MCM and 172 MCM / year respectively. In addition, there is only one groundwater basin in Gaza, the coastal aquifer basin with replenishment capacity of 55 – 60 MCM per year. Surface water, represented mainly by the River, is not yet accessible to the Palestinians and its water is used completely by . In addition to that, water from non-conventional sources can also be considered as important sources, including wastewater, surface runoff and desalinating sea and brackish water. The estimated magnitude of surface runoff component is varying in accordance with rainfall quantity, duration and intensity. In addition, most of the collected wastewater is either fully or partially treated. However, very limited part of the treated wastewater is reused. The magnitude of none conventional water can be summarized in Table 1.

Type of Source Quantity (MCM/Year) Comment Surface Runoff 169 Estimated from all wadis in the West Bank Collected Wastewater 71 30 MCM in West Bank and 41 MCM in Gaza Desalinated Sea and 3.75 0.95 MCM sea water and Brackish water 2.8 MCM brackish water

Despite this good potential of available none conventional water resources, it is unfortunately very little percentage that it is tapped. Other than the desalinated water, only very small percentage of surface runoff is being collected in Auja Dam in West Bank while more than 95% of the collected effluent is not reused even the advanced treated part resulted from the West treatment plant.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 13

Water availability and access to Palestinian citizens in both West Bank and Gaza remains highly restricted and controlled by Israel. Israel’s current water policies do in fact discriminate against Palestinians through several de facto policies, the most obvious of which, manifested though the deprivation of Palestinian from receiving their legal share of trans-boundary water resources. 2. Water Supply Quantity and Service Coverage

Despitethefact that the magnitude of groundwater resources is 672 MCM and thereplenishment areas of the three main aquifers are mainly located within the West Bank (more than 70% of the replenishment area), Israeli water policies have limited Palestinian water use from their local resources to 104 MCM per year in 2012, of which 64.3 MCMabstracted fromGW wells and 39 MCM form springs. It is good to mention that spring discharge vary in accordance with variation in precipitation, for example the discharge of the springs was 21 MCM in 2011 as reported by PWA 2013.

Comparing the Palestinian total water abstraction from their local resources to the figure that was agreed on under the Oslo interim agreement, it can be realized that, Palestinians water abstraction dropped from 118 MCM in 1994 to 104 MCM in 2012 with total reduction of 14 MCM.Such reduction is resulted from the imposed Israeli restrictions on the rehabilitation of existing, and development of new, water resources as well as from the confiscation of local Palestinian water sources by the Israeli separation wall. The cumulative effect of this policy have reduced Palestinian water security and increased their reliance on purchased water quantities from the Israeli water company. Latest figures reported by PWA (2013)1 indicates that 60% of the total Palestinian domestic water use in the West Bank is purchased from Israel. This means that 60% of the domestic water supply in the West Bank is subject to the Israeli merit as to when to supply, where and at what cost.

In the mean time, there are 39 Israeli wells inside the WB, mainly located in the eastern aquifer, producing nearly 54 MCM/Year, 15% of which is sold to Palestinian communities while the rest is allocated to illegal settlements.2

It is estimated that 86% of the Palestinian communities in the West Bank are connected to water supply networks. However, network coverage is not fully in most of these communities where 64 communities of those connected have 80% or less coverage. In the mean time 70 communities are not served at all with total population of 113000 people, PWA (2013). The Situation in the Gaza Strip is different where most of the water supply available from the coastal aquifer is of low quality and not suitable for human use. It is reported that 95% of the water abstracted from the aquifer is of poor quality. The deterioration of the aquifers water quality has been caused by the long term overexploitation which triggered saline water intrusion as well as pollution by various pollution sources including poorly treated effluent as well as agrichemicals. All in all, total domestic water use in Gaza is estimated at 110 MCM, of which 3.7 MCM is secured from desalination, 4 MCM is

1 Annual Water Resources Status Report as on 2012, October 2013 2 Policies of denial p. 15

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 14 purchased from Israeli company and the rest is abstracted from the aquifer where most of it is brackish.

Limitation imposed on the supply have influenced per capita water use to nearly 70 l/d in the West Bank and nearly 90 l/d in Gaza, mostly poor quality.

3. Wastewater Situation

Wastewater collection and treatment varies substantially across West Bank and Gaza. Most of the rural areas are unserved with wastewater collection and treatment while the urban areas are partially served. In the mean time most of Gaza is served with wastewater collection systems. Figure 1 shows the service coverage in both West Bank and Gaza.

Wastewater Connection in West Bank and Gaza 100 92 90 80 68 70 60

% 50 40 32 30 20 8 10 0 Connected Not Connected

West Bank Gaza

Figure1: Service coverage in both West Bank and Gaza

The total volume of collected wastewater through collection system is nearly 41 MCM in Gaza and 30 MCM in the West Bank. Most of the collected wastewater in Gaza is being treated either fully or partially and mostly discharged to the sea. In the mean time the collected effluent in the West Bank from major Palestinian towns and cities is either fully or partially treated and flows either east or westward. Figure 2 shows the volume of treated effluent the flows west and east and its treatment condition.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 15

Collection and Treatment of Wastewater in West Bank

12.9 14 12 10 6.9 8 4.7 6 3.4

MCM/Year 4 2.1 2 0 Fully Treated Partially Treated Not Treated

Flowing West Flowing East

Figure 2: Volume of treated effluent that flows west and east and its treatment condition

It is important to indicate here that most of the treated effluent is unfortunately not reused and flows either eastward or westward. It mixes with untreated effluent from other Palestinian towns and also generated from Israeli Settlements where it is captured, treated and reused in Israel while the cost of treatment is deducted from the Palestinian national budget. Total wastewater treatment bill that was charged to Palestinian national budget in 2015 was 83 Million Shekel (roughly 22 Million $) while this amount was 2 Million Shekel in the year 2000.

4. Water Governance

Following to the decision of government to undertake water sector reform back in 2010, the reform process was effectively started by appointing an independent team to lead the process and creating the proper legal environment to ensure that the process and its outcome are based on solid legal ground. The first step was to reform the existing water law #3 and replace it with a new presidential decree, to issue the Water Law #4for the year 2014 by virtue of which new bodies have been created and the responsibilities of existing bodies have been modified.The Law has particularly provided for the following:

 Creating Water Sector Regulatory Council (WSRC) and assigning the role of monitoring and regulating the work of service providers to the council.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 16

 PWA to remain the main sector regulator, carries out tasks related to the planning, regulating and evaluating of water resources management in terms of economic and social feasibility, and monitoring the implementation of water and wastewater projects and coordinating the work of all relevant agencies.  To upgrade the West Bank Water Department to become the National Water Company.  Emphasized the formation of regional water utilities,three in West Bank and one in Gaza

Based on the new water law, the new water sector structure would look like the following:

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 17

IV: Major Findings of the WASH Situation in the 55 Communities and Proposed Response

1. Introduction

The study has targeted 55 communities as stated earlier and assessed both water and sanitation conditions as well as defined the main challenges and needs in these communities. The main issues covered by the assessment includes, water supply quantity and quality, water supply sources, service coverage, losses, per capita water use and water price. In addition, it covers the water needs as well as the current sanitation and hygiene situation in the 55 communities, it defines the challenges they are facing and proposes some responses to overcome these challenges. The following sections will elaborate on these main findings.

2. Water Supply Quantity and Quality

It was realized that total water quantity supplied to the target communities is below their actual needs as shown in Figure 3.

Supplied versus Needed Quantity in Summer 1105115 1120000 1100000

1080000 /month 3 1036207 1060000

1040000

m Quantity 1020000

1000000 Supplied Quantity m3 Needs m3

Figure 3: Supplied versus needed water quantities

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 18

In addition, water supply and needs vary from one community to the other depending on the type of community, population number but more importantly, to the quantities supplied to the communitiy from the source as can be noticed in the case of Salfit and , figure 4.

80000 70000 Supplied versus Needed Quantity in Summer 60000 50000 40000 /month 3 30000 m 20000 10000 0 Jit 'Isla Qira Salfit Hajja Haris 'Azzun Jayyus Far'ata Immatin Ad Dab'a Ad Deir Ras at at Tira Ras Khirbet Deir Khirbet Kafr Al Mudawwar Al 'Izbat at at Tabib 'Izbat Wadi ar Rasha ar Wadi Baqat al Hatab al Baqat 'Izbat al Ashqar al 'Izbat 'Arab Abu Farda Abu 'Arab A'rab ar Ramadin ash… Ramadin ar A'rab Hassan Bani Qarawat

Figure 4: Supply and needs of each community

In general, the supplied water quality is good with nearly 20% of communities reported acceptable water quality.

3. Water Service Condition and Reliability

The assessment has shown that water supply frequency to the communities vary from 0 day per month as is the case in Arab ABu Fardeh to neraly 30 days per month. 13% of communities reported that they recieve water between 0-10 days per month as shown in Figure 5.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 19

Frequency of Water Supply in Summer day / Month

38 40 35 30 25 20 15 Month / Day 10 7 6 4 5

0

0-10 11-15 16-25 >25

Figure 5: Monthly Water Supply Frequency

Moreover, water pressure in the water supply network is not adequate during summer period where 53% of the communities indicated that water pressure is not adequate and nearly 9% indicated that water pressure is not adequate in both summer and winter as shown in figure 6.

Water Pressure in the Netwrok

9%

Pressure is not sufficient in Summer and Winter

Pressure not sufficient in 53% Summer

Figure 6: Water Pressure in the Network Water price supplied by netwrok is also varies from 1 NIS/m3 in Qalqilia to 10 NIS/m3 in Arab Arramadeen with average price of 3.9 NIS / m3 while tanker water price varies from 8 NIS in Deir Istiya to 35 NIS in Iskaka with average price of 19.6 NIS / m3 as shown in Figure 7.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 20

40 35 35 30 30 27 25 20 20 20 15 15 10 10 11 8 10 4 4 4.6 5 4 4.1 5 2.5 0

Price from Water Netwrok NIS / m3 Price from Water Tanker NIS / m3 Water Price: Water Network vs Tanker

Figure 7: Comparing water price from network versus tankers In addition, per capita water use also vary substantially among the surveyed communities. It vary from 40 to 130 litre per capita per day as shown in Figure 8. In the mean time, the wieghted average per capita water use is 94 l/c/d 140 130 Per Capita Daily Water Use 120 100 80

60l/c/d 40 40 20 0 Jit Qira Hajja Haris Rafat Habla Marda Farkha Far'ata Mas-ha Jinsafut Falamya Sanniriya Zeid Bani Ras 'Atiya Ras Az Zawiya Az Deir Istiya Deir Al Funduq Al Khirbet Sir Khirbet Deir Ballut Deir Kafr An Nabi Elyas Nabi An Al Mudawwar Al 'Izbat al Ashqar al 'Izbat 'Arab Abu Farda Abu 'Arab Arab Al-Khouleh Arab

'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi al Ramadin ar 'Arab Figure Figure 8: Per capita daily water use

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 21

Water losses also vary from 40 % in Bani Zaid to 7 % in AlFunduq with average 20.7% as shown in Figure 9.

45 Water Losses 40 40

35

30

25 % 20 15 10 7 5 0

Jit Qira Hajja Haris Sarta Rafat Habla Marda Farkha Far'ata Mas-ha Jinsafut Falamya Bani Zeid Bani Sanniriya

Ras 'Atiya Ras Az Zawiya Az Deir Istiya Deir Al Funduq Al Khirbet Sir Khirbet Deir Ballut Deir Kafr Thulth Kafr An Nabi Elyas Nabi An Al Mudawwar Al 'Izbat al Ashqar al 'Izbat 'Arab Abu Farda Abu 'Arab

Arab Al-Khouleh Arab

'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi al Ramadin ar 'Arab

Figure 9: Water Losses

Access to water resources varies from bad to good depends on the location of the water source. Nearly 9% of the communities surveyed indicated that access to water sources is bad because either the water source is located behind the wall or the community is surrounded by settlements while nearly 22% indicated that access is acceptable. In the mean time nearly 44% indicated bad access to sanitation and 38% indicated good access as shown in Figure 10. 0.69 0.70 Access to Water and Sanitation

0.60

0.50 0.44 0.38 0.40 Access to Water

% 0.30 Access to Sanitation 0.22 0.18 0.20 0.09 0.10

0.00 Bad Acceptable Good

Figure 10: Access to Water and Sanitation

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 22

4. Wastewater and Solidwaste Serivce Conditions

It was realized that connection to wastewater networks varies from 3% to 95% in Bani Zaid and Qalqilia respectively. In terms of population, almost 33% of the surveyed population are served with wastewater network while 67% are relying on cesspits as shown in figure 11.

Wastewater Network Coverage

0.33 % of People with WW Network

0.67 % of People without WW Network

Figure 11: Water Network Coverage

In addition, 55% of surveyed communites indicated that they dispose their solid waste at managed landfill while 38% indicated that they use unmanaged dump sites as shown in figure 12.

Solidwaste Disposal

0.07

0.38 Landfill 0.55 Dump site

Random Disposal

Figure 12: Solid Waste Disposal

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 23

5. Gender and Water

It was realized that gender representation in the water and sanitation realted aspects in the surveyed communities are moderate to low. The results obtained shows that nearly 15% of Female members of local council committees participates in decision making related to water and sanitation. In the same time, female staff working in water and wastewater sections in the local councils accounts for only 11% of total staff number. It was however, realized that 24% of the contacts and complains received by local councils are coming from women in these areas as shown in figure 13.

24 Gender Representation in WASH 25 Sector

20 15 15 11.4

% 10

5

0 Women Female Staff Percentage of Participation in Membersin Water complains received Decision Making and Sanitation from women on Sections WASH Issues

Figure 13: Gender Representation in WASH

6. Major WASH Needs

It was concluded that communities need more interventions to increase water quantity available and improve existing water infrastructure including construct more water networks and reservoirs as well as reduce leakage and improve water billing. In addition, improving the water quality through better chlorination and stop pollution sources. Construct more cisterns and more storage facilities was also among the list of needs as well as constructing wastewater collection and treatment systems. More details are presented in Tables below:

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 24

Recognized More Details Affected communities (mostly) Needs (Proposed Actions) Problem 1- Water Supply Low LCD especially in summer , Izbat at Tabib, Az Zawiya, -Increasing water supply, or Shortage Ras at Tira, Izbat al Ashqar, Wadi ar finding new water sources. Rasha, Arab ar Ramadin ash Shamali, -Pump on main line (most Arab abu Farda, Arab Al-Khouleh, locations have no control on the Rafat, Sanniriya. supply points from Mekorot) Water distribution in some shared (Jit and Kafr Qaddum), (Baqat al Hatab, -Monitoring shared water supply water supply points is not enough Hajja, Far'ata, Immatin, Al Funduq, and points periodically Jinsafut), (Sarta, , -Awareness for citizens and and ), ( and Iskaka), (Ras at tankers owners. Tira). -Rehabilitation of wells and High costs of purchased water tankers Jinsafut, Iskaka, and Bedouin families in springs Deir Istiya, Deir Ballut, Salfit, Fakha, -New cisterns for domestic use Arab ar Ramadin ash Shamali, Arab and rehabilitation for old ones abu Farda. -Connecting some local springs to Low pressure in water net work Qira, Haris, Biddya, Qarawet Bani water network, Hassan, Kafr AdDik -Agricultural Cisterns for Bedouin Additional needs of water in some Kafr Qaddum, Baqat al Hatab, Hajja, families. communities for agriculture and Far'ata, Immatin, Al Funduq, Qira, industrial projects Jinsafut, Salfit, Qarawat Bani Hassan, Biddya, Farkha, Yasuf, Iskaka, Burqin, Azzun, Jayyus, Khirbet Qeis Lack of large scale water harvesting Deir Ballut projects. 2- High Water Bad conditions of old water networks. Baqat al Hatab, Jinsafut, Kafr Qaddum, -Rehabilitation of water Losses Sometimes water supply from sources , Haris, Qira, Marda, Biddya, networks. are enough but high losses makes Bani Zeid, Rafat, Jayyus, Falamya, Wadi -Replacing the hoses by metallic water crisis ar Rasha, Ad Dab’a, Sanniriya, Izbat al pipes. Ashqar -Regular readings of water Most expansions of water networks Almost all Locations meters. are made without suitable -Water meters for supply water specifications (by hoses or unfitted sources pipes) - Capacity building for workers in In some communities high losses even Most of surveyed locations whom do this sector with new water networks may be not have prepaid water meters -Maintenance tools for the water caused by irregular readings of water networks meters -Awareness programs for citizens Illegal access to water network Rafat 3-Low Water No reservoirs in some location, or they Al Funduq, Qira -New reservoirs with suitable Storage are out of work capacity Capacity Small reservoir, or some Deir Istiya, Biddya, Kifl Haris, Marda, -Rehabilitation the old ones neighborhoods are not served Deir Ballut, Bani Zeid, Farkha, Haris 4- Low Water -Sometimes water quality is good from Marda, Izbat al Ashqar, Khirbet Sir, Beit - W networks Rehabilitation Quality source, but it is affected by wastewater Amin -Wells and springs rehabilitation leakage in old water networks - Cisterns rehabilitation - Controlling of water quality in

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 25

Recognized More Details Affected communities (mostly) Needs (Proposed Actions) Problem Using of available lower water quality Arab Al-Khouleh ,Arab ar Ramadin al cisterns and water tankers. sources (agricultural wells or springs), Janubi, Arab ar Ramadin ash Shamali, -Controlling water quality in local that probably have uncontrolled water Arab abu Farda, Izbat abu Adam springs. quality - Chlorination units Water quality of domestic cisterns and Jinsafut, Iskaka, Arab Al-Khouleh , Arab -Awareness for citizens and water tankers is uncontrolled for ar Ramadin al Janubi, Arab ar Ramadin tankers owners. locations depend (partially or totally) ash Shamali, Arab abu Farda, Izbat abu on these sources Adam 5- Low Rate Low rate collection of water bills, in Qalqiliya, Habla, Jit, Kafr Qaddum, - Awareness programs for citizens Collection of some locations. Qira, Haris, Deir Istiya, Yasuf, , Bani -Most municipalities and councils Water Bills Zeid , Izbat at Tabib, Kafr Laqif, Rafat are Calling for Replacement of Citizens in some locations think that Locations in Qalqiliya dis., Farkha in water meters by prepay ones. water price is high comparing with Salfit dis. locations around them 6- Wastewater No wastewater networks in most Azzun, Kafr Thulth, Qarawat Bani -New wastewater networks with Disposal surveyed communities. Hassan, Az Zawiya, Biddya, Kafr ad Dik, Wastewater treatment plants Problems Bani Zeid, Biddya, … (WWTP). Some locations have partially ww Habla, Hajja, Salfit -Expansion of existing network, and there is no waste water wastewater networks, and treatment plant (Hajja has but it is not (WWTP) working) - Finding suitable places for ww Springs in some communities are Marda, Iskaka disposal from vacuum tankers contaminated by sewage leakage from - Rehabilitation of springs. cesspits. -Removing pollution sources - Random wastewater disposal from Kafr Qaddum, Jinsafut, Wadi ar Rasha, specially from settlements settlements or military Camps to lands Deir Istiya, Haris, Yasuf, Biddya, - Capacity building for workers in around or near some the communities, Qarawat Bani Hassan, Sarta, Salfit, this sector, and vacuum tankers which causes odours insects and Farkha, Kifl Haris, Kafr ad Dik, Burqin, - Awareness programs for citizens rodents. Deir Ballut, Sanniriya, Arab Al-Khouleh, ,

7- Solid Waste - Many of the solid waste disposal 21 out of 55 surveyed communities are - Tariffs study for solid waste Disposal methods are random dumpsites, due using dumpsites disposal in landfills. Problems to the high cost of Zahret Al-finjan -Providing solid waste collection landfill. This causes odours insects and trucks and containers rodents - Removing pollution sources - Some locations are in need for 24 out of 55 need containers, -Supporting Salfit JCSW to make a containers and solid waste collection landfill to serve Salfit district truck -Closure dumpsites and Solid Waste collection twice per week Two JCSW representing All surveyed rehabilitation their lands is not enough which become good locations - Supporting separation and places to feed Dogs, cats and wild pigs) recycling activities for SW programs and projects. Currently there are no separation and All surveyed locations - Encouraging private sector to recycling within the activities of Joined involve in this Council for Solid Waste, but there are - Capacity building for workers in people (Hand Picker) collect some this sector materials such as metals, plastics, nylon and carton.

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 26

Recognized More Details Affected communities (mostly) Needs (Proposed Actions) Problem Solid Waste diposal from settlements Jinsafut, Wadi ar Rasha, Salit, Qarawat around locations like nylon, plastics, Bani Hassan and industrial SW 8- Weak An acute shortage of technical staff for Most of the surveyed communities - Formation of more water Joined Capacity of water services within the village councils. Following up councils, including maintenance, - Increasing of technical staff for Water Services collection and meter readers. water service within the village Lack of necessary maintenance tools Most of the surveyed communities councils. for the water networks, and losses - Capacity building for workers in follow-up tools. this sector even water joint councils to improve water service Some councils still do not have a Qira, Izbat at Tabib, Arab abu Farda, - Encouraging computerize water computerize system to track the water Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi, Arab ar system use and providing training network information (quantities of Ramadin ash Shamali for staff to access water service water supply, consumption and losses), information- or documentation system. - Encouraging documentation Maintenance in water network occurs Most of the surveyed communities system use and providing training in the event of breakdowns, for staff. complaints, or problems occur, and maintenance operations are not documented clearly. Most old water network have no as Most of the surveyed communities built-planned, and most expansions in network executed randomly even with hoses. No reading of supply water meter for Marda, Fakha water springs pumped to drinking water NW Irregular readings for household water Most surveyed locations whom do not meters in have prepaid water meters 9- Occupation Some communities are totally isolated Arab abu Farda, Arab ar Ramadin al Obstacles by wall Janubi, Arab ar Ramadin ash Shamali Some communities are totally located Arab abu Farda, Arab ar Ramadin al in area C (carrier main line in area C Janubi, Arab ar Ramadin ash Shamali, which make maintenance activities Izbat at Tabib, Wadi ar Rasha, Izbat difficult) Adam, Ad Dab’a, Arab Al-Khouleh The settlers sometimes attack the sites of main reservoirs, and close the water supply valves Refusal of main reservoir licenses by occupation forces. Temporary checkpoints disturb the Arab abu Farda, Arab ar Ramadin ash movement of water tankers. Shamali, Notice of demolition for agricultural cisterns. Random wastewater disposal from Sanniriya, Azzun Atma, Beit Amin settlements or military locations Supply water points from Mekorot are not controlled by local councils (there was a reduction for water quantities

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 27

Recognized More Details Affected communities (mostly) Needs (Proposed Actions) Problem from Mekorot) Sometimes settlers or Israeli occupation soldiers prevent Solid waste vehicles and vacuum tanks to dispose their loads, or even confiscation these machines and tools

10- Gender Female local council members do not Obstacles participate in decision making in some locations Women contacting local councils for issues related to WaSH is rarely in some village councils Some village councils do not have any female staff Most female staff position in local councils are secretary or accountant (Not technical)

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 28

APPENDIXES

APPENDIX – A: Surveyed Communities

APPENDIX – B: Questionnaire

APPENDIX – C: Tables and Maps

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 29

APPENDIX–A: Surveyed Communities

SN ID Community name District Population

1 200905 Falamya Qalqiliya 774 2 200925 Kafr Qaddum Qalqiliya 3354 3 200945 Jit Qalqiliya 2459 4 200965 Baqat al Hatab Qalqiliya 1987 5 200970 Hajja Qalqiliya 2719 6 200985 Jayyus Qalqiliya 3557 7 200995 Khirbet Sir Qalqiliya 660 8 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali Qalqiliya 86 9 201015 Far'ata Qalqiliya 892 10 201020 Immatin Qalqiliya 2817 11 201035 Al Funduq Qalqiliya 1150 12 201040 Qalqiliya Qalqiliya 52851 13 201055 An Nabi Elyas Qalqiliya 1431 14 201065 Kafr Laqif Qalqiliya 1062 15 201070 'Arab Abu Farda Qalqiliya 134 16 201075 'Izbat at Tabib Qalqiliya 264 17 201085 Jinsafut Qalqiliya 2629 18 201100 'Azzun Qalqiliya 9478 19 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi Qalqiliya 292 20 201115 'Isla Qalqiliya 1136 21 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh Qalqiliya 50 22 201120 Wadi ar Rasha Qalqiliya 155 23 201125 Habla Qalqiliya 7216 24 201130 Ras at Tira Qalqiliya 495 25 201155 Ras 'Atiya Qalqiliya 2177 26 201170 Ad Dab'a Qalqiliya 421 27 201175 Kafr Thulth Qalqiliya 5733 28 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud Qalqiliya 149

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 30

SN ID Community name District Population

29 201205 Al Mudawwar Qalqiliya 358 30 201210 'Izbat Salman Qalqiliya 916 31 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar Qalqiliya 461 32 201255 Beit Amin Qalqiliya 1308 33 201260 Sanniriya Qalqiliya 3691 34 201280 'Azzun 'Atma Qalqiliya 2115 35 251250 Deir Istiya Salfit 3780 36 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan Salfit 5638 37 251290 Qira Salfit 1307 38 251295 Kifl Haris Salfit 4176 39 251300 Marda Salfit 2429 40 251305 Biddya Salfit 10687 41 251310 Haris Salfit 4230 42 251315 Yasuf Salfit 2140 43 251320 Mas-ha Salfit 2424 44 251330 Iskaka Salfit 1225 45 251340 Sarta Salfit 3458 46 251355 Izbat Abu Adam Salfit 25 47 251360 Az Zawiya Salfit 6169 48 251370 Salfit Salfit 11158 49 251395 Rafat Salfit 2579 50 251400 Bruqin Salfit 4138 51 251415 Farkha Salfit 1687 52 251425 Kafr ad Dik Salfit 5676 53 251430 Deir Ballut Salfit 3961 54 251440 Khirbet Qeis Salfit 279 55 301480 Bani Zeid Ramallah 6163

- The number of surveyed communities is 55 (34 in Qalqiliya, 20 in Salfit, and 1 in Ramallah - The Population sum of the surveyed communities is 198 300

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 31

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 32

APPENDIX–B:Questionnaire

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 33

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 34

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 35

APPENDIX–C: Tables and Maps

Communities Isolated by Wall or 40% of Residents or more are Living in Area C

SN ID Community name Population Residents Isolated Residents in by Wall (%) Area C (%) 1 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 100 100

2 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 100 100

3 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 100 100

4 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 0 100

5 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 0 100

6 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 0 100

7 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 0 100

8 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 0 100

9 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 0 90

10 201035 Al Funduq 1150 0 50

11 201130 Ras at Tira 495 0 50

12 251395 Rafat 2579 0 40

13 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 0 40

14 201085 Jinsafut 2629 0 40

15 251320 Mas-ha 2424 0 40

16 251340 Sarta 3458 0 40

17 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 0 40

18 201125 Habla 7216 0 40

3 communities of the surveyed ones are totally isolated by wall 8 communities are totally in area C

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 36

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 37

Waste Water Network Coverage < 20% and Population > 5000

SN ID Community name Population WW network Cesspits or septic Open WW coverage (%) tanks coverage (%) coverage (%) 1 201100 'Azzun 9478 0 100 0

2 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 0 100 0

3 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 0 100 0

4 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 0 100 0

5 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 0 100 0

6 301480 Bani Zeid 6163 3 97 0

7 251305 Biddya 10687 5 95 0

5 communities of the surveyed ones are without waste water networks

Solid Waste Collection < 90%

SN ID Community name Population Solid waste collection Solid waste coverage (%) method 1 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 0 Random site

2 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 0 Random site

3 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 0 Random site

4 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 0 Random site

5 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 85 Dumpsite

4 communities of the surveyed ones are without solid waste collection coverage

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 38

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 39

Communities with Pollutions

SN ID Community name Population Pollution sources 1 200905 Falamya 774 -Agriculture pesticides -Cesspits -Wild pigs -Sewage disposal in south and south eastern part from Hajja 2 200925 Kafr Qaddum 3354 and settlement -Military camp destroying summer farming -Waste water disposal from settlement and Hajja in Kafr 3 200970 Hajja 2719 Qaddoom vally 4 200985 Jayyus 3557 -Cesspits -Wild pigs 5 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 -Cesspits -Wild pigs A'rab ar Ramadin ash -Animals residants -Cesspits -Israeli army waste water 6 201005 86 Shamali -Old dumpsite (It is used from all locations in the governorate, 7 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 and not prepared as enviromental one) 8 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 -Cesspits 9 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 -Cesspits -Animals residants 10 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 -Cesspits -Dumping liquid waste from pickled factories in the eastern 11 201085 Jinsafut 2629 part from Emmanuel settlement -Solid waste burning 12 201100 'Azzun 9478 -Cesspits -Solid waste dump site -Stone saws 'Arab ar Ramadin al -Cesspits -Animals residants 13 201105 292 Janubi 14 201115 'Isla 1136 -Cesspits 15 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 -Settlement waste water -Wild pigs 16 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 -Cesspits -Settlement waste water (Alfa Manashay) -Naylon and Plastic solid waste from Alfi Manashi settlement, 17 201125 Habla 7216 dumped in Wadi ar Rasha near Habla -Cesspits -Wild pigs 18 201130 Ras at Tira 495

19 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 -Cesspits 20 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 -Cesspits -Wild pigs -Biddya dump site (They always burn the waste , which 21 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 produce very bad smell and smoking) 22 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 -Cesspits -Wild pigs 23 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 -Agriculture pesticides -Cesspits 24 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 -Agriculture pesticides -Cesspits 25 201255 Beit Amin 1308 -Cesspits -Settlements waste water (Shear Tekfe) -Solid waste dump site -Settlement waste water -Cesspits - 26 201260 Sanniriya 3691 Agriculture pesticides -Agriculture pisticides -Cesspits -Settlement waste water 27 201280 'Azzun 'Atma 2115 (She'ar Tekfa)

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 40

SN ID Community name Population Pollution sources -Waste water floads from 8 settlements ww networks in wadi 28 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 Qana, which causes damages in agricultural lands -Waste water and solid waste disposal in wadi A'bass and 29 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 wadi Sarta from settlements -Vacum tanks disposal waste water in agricultureal lands in 30 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 the north, and north eastern parts of the community -Vacum tanks disposal waste water in wadi Al Waid and wadi 31 251305 Biddya 10687 Al Jurf -Waste water fload from cesspits -Waste water disposal in the eastern part vally from Haris and 32 251310 Haris 4230 locations around -Settlement waste water disposal in wadi Burqin -Settlement waste water disposal (Taffuh) in agricultural land 33 251315 Yasuf 2140 -Cesspits - Settlement waste water (Burkan) 34 251320 Mas-ha 2424

35 251340 Sarta 3458 -Settlements waste water -Settlement waste water (Burkan) 36 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 -Cesspits 37 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 -Settlements and Salfit waste water disposal and solid waste 38 251370 Salfit 11158 dumpe site 39 251395 Rafat 2579 -Cesspits -Wild pigs -Solid waste dumping site -Settlements and Salfit waste water disposal -Bad shared 40 251400 Bruqin 4138 councils solid waste service -Waste water disposal from salfit and settlements (Araeil and 41 251415 Farkha 1687 Borkan) in Farkha northern part (Wadi al Matwi) -Settlements and Salfit waste water disposal 42 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 -Waste water disposal from 2 settlements in wadi Rafat, 43 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 espicialy in winter -Cesspits -Wild pigs 44 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279

80% of the surveyed communities (44 out of 55) have pollution sources

Most of the pollution sources are Cesspits and Waste water disposal from settlements

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 41

Communities Without Health Centers and Population > 500 No. of public No. of private No. of public SN ID Community name Population hospitals hospitals health centres 1 201015 Far'ata 892 0 0 0 2 201035 Al Funduq 1150 0 0 0 3 201115 'Isla 1136 0 0 0

Communities with Not Good Water Quality

Total bacterial Accepted bacterial tests SN ID Community name Population Water quality remarks tests in year Accepted tests (number) (Number) (%) Defect in the chlorination 1 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 2 1 50 system Defect in the chlorination 2 201100 'Azzun 9478 48 44 92 system 3 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 No chlorination unit 2 1 50

4 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 No chlorination unit 6 4 67 No w tests for w network, but it seems to have pollution 5 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 0 from cesspits (leaking w network) Water color is tawards red, 6 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 12 12 100 due to w network leaking A'rab ar Ramadin 7 201005 86 No chlorination unit 0 ash Shamali 8 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 No chlorination unit 2 1 50

9 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 Problem in chlorination unit 6 4 67

'Arab ar Ramadin al No chlorination unit, and the 10 201105 292 0 Janubi w network lines are plastic

11 201255 Beit Amin 1308 No chlorination unit 2 1 50

The absence of chlorination units is the main reason for not good water quality

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 42

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 43

Communities with Not Sufficient Water Quantities in Summer Sum of w supply Needed w quantity SN ID Community name (m3/month) (m3/month) 1 200995 Khirbet Sir 3400 4400 2 201115 'Isla 7800 9800 3 201100 'Azzun 43000 60000 4 200985 Jayyus 18000 20000 5 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 1000 2000 6 201205 Al Mudawwar 1200 1500 7 201260 Sanniriya 14050 15000 8 251330 Iskaka 3185 4200 9 251400 Bruqin 13132 15000 10 200965 Baqat al Hatab 8850 11000 11 200945 Jit 6600 10000 12 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 1700 2500 13 201130 Ras at Tira 2300 4000 14 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 350 700 15 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 750 1000 16 201170 Ad Dab'a 3200 5000 17 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 450 600 18 251370 Salfit 56500 70000 19 251415 Farkha 6090 8000 20 251290 Qira 5145 7500 21 201015 Far'ata 4300 5000 22 201020 Immatin 10200 12000 23 200970 Hajja 13150 15000 24 201085 Jinsafut 8500 10000 25 200925 Kafr Qaddum 13440 15000 26 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 24400 30000 27 251440 Khirbet Qeis 1600 2000 Supplied water quantities in about 50% of the surveyed communities (27 out of 55) are not sufficient, and the supplied quantities are only 80% of the needed ones

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 44

Communities with Not Sufficient Water Pressure or/and Not Sufficient W Network Supply Frequency W pressure is sufficient? W frequency is sufficient? SN ID Community name Population Summer Winter Summer Winter 1 200945 Jit 2459 No Yes Yes Yes 2 200965 Baqat al Hatab 1987 No No No Yes 3 200970 Hajja 2719 No Yes Yes Yes 4 200985 Jayyus 3557 No Yes No Yes 5 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 Yes Yes No Yes 6 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 No No No No 7 201015 Far'ata 892 No Yes Yes Yes 8 201020 Immatin 2817 No Yes Yes Yes 9 201035 Al Funduq 1150 No Yes Yes Yes 10 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 No No Yes Yes 11 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 No No No No 12 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 No Yes No Yes 13 201085 Jinsafut 2629 No Yes No Yes 14 201115 'Isla 1136 No Yes Yes Yes 15 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 No Yes Yes Yes 16 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 No Yes Yes Yes 17 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 No No Yes Yes 18 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 No Yes No Yes 19 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 No Yes Yes Yes 20 201260 Sanniriya 3691 No Yes Yes Yes 21 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 No Yes Yes Yes 22 251290 Qira 1307 No Yes No Yes 23 251300 Marda 2429 No Yes Yes Yes 24 251305 Biddya 10687 No Yes No Yes 25 251310 Haris 4230 No Yes Yes Yes 26 251315 Yasuf 2140 No Yes No Yes 27 251320 Mas-ha 2424 No Yes Yes Yes 28 251330 Iskaka 1225 No Yes No Yes 29 251340 Sarta 3458 No Yes Yes Yes 30 251400 Bruqin 4138 Yes Yes No Yes 31 251415 Farkha 1687 Yes Yes No Yes 32 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 No Yes No Yes 33 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279 Yes Yes No Yes Water pressure in summer in 53% of the surveyed communities (29 out of 55) is not sufficient Water pressure in winter in 9% of the surveyed communities (5 out of 55) is not sufficient Water supply frequency in summer in 29% of the surveyed communities (16 out of 55) is not sufficient Water supply frequency in winter in 4% of the surveyed communities (2 out of 55) is not sufficient

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 45

Communities with Water Losses > 20%

Water losses WN establishment SN ID Community name Population WN condition (%) year 1 301480 Bani Zeid 6163 40 1991 Bad 2 251305 Biddya 10687 36 1984 Leaking

3 201260 Sanniriya 3691 35 1998 Leaking

4 251290 Qira 1307 35 1998 Bad

5 251310 Haris 4230 34 2000 Bad

6 200925 Kafr Qaddum 3354 33 1984 Leaking

7 251300 Marda 2429 30 1993 Bad

8 251395 Rafat 2579 30 1990 Bad

9 201130 Ras at Tira 495 30 2003 Leaking

10 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 30 1998 Leaking

11 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 30 1994 Leaking

12 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 28 1984 Leaking

13 200965 Baqat al Hatab 1987 28 2014 Bad

14 201085 Jinsafut 2629 28 1994 Bad

15 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 27 1960 Leaking Qarawat Bani 16 251275 5638 27 2002 Leaking Hassan 17 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 26 1989 Bad

18 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 25 2004 Leaking

19 200985 Jayyus 3557 25 1977 Leaking

20 201100 'Azzun 9478 25 1978 Leaking

21 200905 Falamya 774 25 1973 Leaking 22 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 25 2000 Leaking 23 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 22 2001 Leaking Water losses in 41% of the surveyed communities (23 out of 55) exceeds 20%

Water losses in 20% of the surveyed communities (11 out of 55) exceeds 30%

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 46

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 47

Communities with LCD < 70

SN ID Community name Population LCD in Summer LCD in Winter LCD

1 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 43 38 40 2 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 53 30 42 3 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 53 33 43 4 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 45 45 45 5 251395 Rafat 2579 47 45 46

6 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 50 47 48

7 201260 Sanniriya 3691 52 45 48 8 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 55 51 53 9 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 61 51 56 10 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 61 56 58 11 201130 Ras at Tira 495 61 57 59 12 201100 'Azzun 9478 64 55 60 13 201085 Jinsafut 2629 73 49 61 14 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 67 56 62 15 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 72 57 64 16 200945 Jit 2459 76 52 64 17 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 72 60 66 18 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 68 64 66 19 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 73 62 68 20 201020 Immatin 2817 88 50 69

21 201255 Beit Amin 1308 77 61 69

LCD in 38% of the surveyed communities (21 out of 55) < 70

LCD in 13% of the surveyed communities (7 out of 55) < 50

Weighted LCD in the surveyed communities is 94

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 48

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 49

Communities with water network coverage < 100% and Population > 500

SN ID Community name Population WN Coverage (%)

1 201210 'Izbat Salman 916 95

2 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 95

3 201115 'Isla 1136 95

4 201100 'Azzun 9478 95

5 200985 Jayyus 3557 90

6 200905 Falamya 774 80

7 201260 Sanniriya 3691 90

8 251330 Iskaka 1225 95

9 251400 Bruqin 4138 98

10 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 90

11 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 96

12 251315 Yasuf 2140 88

13 251415 Farkha 1687 98

14 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 99

15 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 99

One community (Arab al Khouleh (population is about 50) is without water network

Water network coverage in 40% of the surveyed communities (22 out of 55) is not 100%,

Population of 15 of them is > 500

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 50

Communities with Not Good Water Network Condition SN ID Community name Population WN Condition WN Establishment Year 1 201100 'Azzun 9478 Leaking 1978 2 200985 Jayyus 3557 Leaking 1977 3 200905 Falamya 774 Leaking 1973 4 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 Leaking 2004 5 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 Leaking 2000 6 201260 Sanniriya 3691 Leaking 1998 7 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 Leaking 1960 8 301480 Bani Zeid 6163 Bad 1991 9 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 Leaking 1984 10 251300 Marda 2429 Bad 1993 11 200965 Baqat al Hatab 1987 Bad 2014 12 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 Leaking 2005 13 201130 Ras at Tira 495 Leaking 2003 14 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 Leaking 1998 15 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 Leaking 1994 16 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 Leaking 2002 17 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 Leaking 2004 18 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 Leaking 2001 19 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 Leaking 2010 20 201125 Habla 7216 Leaking 1997 21 201255 Beit Amin 1308 Leaking 2002 22 251395 Rafat 2579 Bad 1990 23 251320 Mas-ha 2424 Leaking 1985 24 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 Leaking 1981 25 251305 Biddya 10687 Leaking 1984 26 251310 Haris 4230 Bad 2000 27 251290 Qira 1307 Bad 1998 28 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 Bad 1989 29 201015 Far'ata 892 Leaking 2010 30 201020 Immatin 2817 Leaking 2012 31 200970 Hajja 2719 Leaking 2007 32 201085 Jinsafut 2629 Bad 1994 33 200925 Kafr Qaddum 3354 Leaking 1984 34 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 Leaking 1997 35 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 Leaking 2002 36 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279 Leaking 1997 Water network condition in 65% of the surveyed communities (36 out of 55) is not good (leaking or bad), where 8 communities of them have bad water network condition

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 51

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 52

Communities with Cisterns Coverage < 20% SN ID Community name Population HH with Cisterns (%) 1 201210 'Izbat Salman 916 0 2 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 0 3 200905 Falamya 774 0 4 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 0 5 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 0 6 201280 'Azzun 'Atma 2115 0 7 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 0 8 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 0 9 201130 Ras at Tira 495 0 10 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 0 11 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 0 12 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 0 13 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 0 14 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 0 15 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 0 16 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 0 17 201125 Habla 7216 0 18 251370 Salfit 11158 0 19 201255 Beit Amin 1308 0 20 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 0 21 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 0 22 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279 0 23 201035 Al Funduq 1150 1 24 251320 Mas-ha 2424 1 25 201100 'Azzun 9478 5 26 251395 Rafat 2579 5 27 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 6 28 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 10 29 251315 Yasuf 2140 10 30 251310 Haris 4230 10 31 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 13 32 201115 'Isla 1136 15 Communities with cisterns coverage < 20% are 58% (29 out of 55) of the surveyed ones Communities without cisterns are 40% (22 out of 55) of the surveyed ones

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 53

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 54

Communities Using Water Tankers

Distance of SN ID Community name Population Filling points of water tankers nearest filling point (m) Network filling point in Salfit (5 km), 1 251330 Iskaka 1225 5000 and Farkha (8 km)

2 251400 Bruqin 4138 Burqin w network filling point 500

A'rab ar Ramadin ash 3 201005 86 Al Hasamis agriculture well 2000 Shamali

'Arab ar Ramadin al From other houses having w 4 201105 292 500 Janubi network

5 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 Abu Maryam agricultural well 2500

6 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 Sarta w network filling point 1000

7 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 Deir Ballut w network filling point 100

Falammya agricultural well filling 8 201085 Jinsafut 2629 8000 point

9 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 Deir Istiya w network filling point 4000

Communities using water tankers are 16% (9 out of 55) of the surveyed ones Distances of filling points of 6 of them are >= 1000 m

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 55

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 56

Communities with Water network Price > 4 or Water Tankers Price > 10

S ID Community name Population Price of water from Price of Water N network (NIS/m3) Tankers (NIS/m3) 1 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 10 20

2 301480 Bani Zeid 6163 5,6 3 201035 Al Funduq 1150 5,5 4 251310 Haris 4230 5,1 5 200970 Hajja 2719 5,1 6 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 5 15

7 200965 Baqat al Hatab 1987 5 8 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 5 9 251415 Farkha 1687 5 10 251330 Iskaka 1225 4,6 35

11 251300 Marda 2429 4,5 12 200945 Jit 2459 4,5 13 201015 Far'ata 892 4,5 14 201020 Immatin 2817 4,5 15 200925 Kafr Qaddum 3354 4,5 16 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 4,3 17 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 4,3 18 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 4,2 19 251370 Salfit 11158 4,2 20 251315 Yasuf 2140 4,2 21 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 4,1 20 22 201085 Jinsafut 2629 4 30 23 251400 Bruqin 4138 4 11

24 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 27 Price of water from water network in A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali is very high (10 NIS/m3) Price of water from water tankers in Iskaka and Jinsafut is very high (>=30 NIS/m3)

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 57

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 58

Communities with Households that Pay Water Bills < 80%

ID Community name Population HH pay w bills (%) SN 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 0 1 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 40 2 251395 Rafat 2579 50 3 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 54 4 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 55 5 201125 Habla 7216 60 6 251290 Qira 1307 60 7 251310 Haris 4230 60 8 200945 Jit 2459 65 9 200905 Falamya 774 70 10 251315 Yasuf 2140 70 11 201035 Al Funduq 1150 70 12 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 70 13 201280 'Azzun 'Atma 2115 75 14 301480 Bani Zeid 6163 76 15 200925 Kafr Qaddum 3354 78 16

Households in ‘Izbat at tabib don’t pay water bills

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 59

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 60

Communities with Not Sufficient Water Storage Capacity Community w storage Reservoire supply in SN ID Community name Population capacity (m3) case of w cut (days) 1 201055 An Nabi Elyas 1431 0 2 201035 Al Funduq 1150 0 3 200945 Jit 2459 0 4 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 0 5 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 0 6 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 0 7 251395 Rafat 2579 0 8 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 0 9 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 0 10 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 100 0 11 251290 Qira 1307 200 0 12 200985 Jayyus 3557 250 0,5 13 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 60 0,5 14 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 60 0,5 15 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 5500 0,5 16 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 200 0,5 17 251300 Marda 2429 100 0,5 18 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 500 0,5 19 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 250 0,5 20 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 200 0,5 21 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 200 0,5 22 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279 300 0,5 23 201115 'Isla 1136 250 1 24 201100 'Azzun 9478 1000 1 25 201260 Sanniriya 3691 300 1 26 201280 'Azzun 'Atma 2115 300 1 27 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 200 1 28 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 200 1 29 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 80 1 30 251370 Salfit 11158 2100 1 31 201255 Beit Amin 1308 200 1 32 251340 Sarta 3458 585 1 33 251415 Farkha 1687 180 1 34 251310 Haris 4230 300 1 35 201020 Immatin 2817 100 1 36 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 500 1 37 251315 Yasuf 2140 500 1,5 Communities with non sufficient storage capacity are 67% (37 out of 55) of the surveyed ones 9 of them are without any storage capacity

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 61

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 62

Communities Without WASH Activities

SN ID Community name Population 1 201210 'Izbat Salman 916 2 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 3 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 4 200905 Falamya 774 5 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 6 251330 Iskaka 1225 7 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 8 251400 Bruqin 4138 9 201035 Al Funduq 1150 10 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 11 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 12 200965 Baqat al Hatab 1987 13 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 14 201130 Ras at Tira 495 15 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 16 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 17 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 18 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 19 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 20 201125 Habla 7216 21 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 22 201255 Beit Amin 1308 23 251395 Rafat 2579 24 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 25 251320 Mas-ha 2424 26 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 27 251305 Biddya 10687 28 251340 Sarta 3458 29 251310 Haris 4230 30 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 31 201015 Far'ata 892 32 201020 Immatin 2817 33 200970 Hajja 2719 34 201085 Jinsafut 2629 35 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 63

Communities with Bad WASH Access Population Water access Sanitation access Solidwaste access Community SN ID name Situation Remarks Situation Remarks Situation Remarks

The site of dumping cesspits tanks 1 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 Good Bad Good waste water is isolated by wall Law pressure No suitable from Mekarot site for 2 201115 'Isla 1136 Acceptable Bad Good main line in dumping summer waste water

No suitable site for 3 201100 'Azzun 9478 Good Bad Good dumping waste water

Water No suitable resources are site for 4 200985 Jayyus 3557 Bad Bad Good located dumping behind wall waste water Waste water leacking from 5 200905 Falamya 774 Good Bad cesspits tanks Good in to streets and neighbors No suitable site for 'Izbat al dumping 6 201225 461 Good Bad Good Ashqar waste water (community near wall) No suitable Wall is very Al site for 7 201205 358 Acceptable close to Bad Good Mudawwar dumping locality waste water

No suitable The solid The water site for waste 8 201260 Sanniriya 3691 Bad source is Bad Bad dumping dumpsite is behind wall waste water behind wall

No suitable site for 9 201280 'Azzun 'Atma 2115 Good Bad Good dumping waste water

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 64

Population Water access Sanitation access Solidwaste access Community SN ID name Situation Remarks Situation Situation Remarks Situation

The town has 10 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 Good Good Bad no dumpsite for solidwaste

No suitable site for dumping 11 201130 Ras at Tira 495 Good Bad Good waste water (Wall is near the houses) No suitable site for Wadi ar dumping 12 201120 155 Good Bad Good Rasha waste water (all is near the houses) There is a No suitable random site Water source site for 13 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 Acceptable Bad Acceptable for solid waste is behind wall dumping from waste water settlement Community is No suitable The location is behind wall, site for behind the A'rab ar and the Israeli dumping wall, and no 14 201005 Ramadin ash 86 Bad forces don't Bad waste water Bad services for Shamali allow using (community is collecting agriculture behind the solid waste well wall) No suitable site for 15 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 Good Bad Good dumping waste water No suitable site for dumping 16 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 Good Bad Good waste water (Wall is near the houses) Community is behind wall, Community is and the Israel No suitable behind wall, 'Arab ar don't allow site for and no solid 17 201105 Ramadin al 292 Acceptable Bad Bad supplying dumping waste Janubi water by pipes waste water collection services

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 65

Population Water access Sanitation access Solidwaste access Community SN ID name Situation Remarks Situation Situation Remarks Situation

Community is Community is No suitable behind wall, behind wall, site for the solid 'Arab Abu and the w dumping 18 201070 134 Bad Bad Bad waste collec. Farda trucks face waste water trucks can't problems with (community is reach the Israeil army behind wall) community No suitable No services site for for solid Izbat Abu The location is dumping 19 251355 25 Acceptable Bad Bad waste, and Adam near wall waste water The location is (community is near wall near the wall) No suitable The location is site for 20 201255 Beit Amin 1308 Acceptable Bad Good near wall dumping waste water No suitable site for No suitable dumping location for 21 251395 Rafat 2579 Good Bad waste water Bad the solid (community is waste dump near site settlement) settlements No suitable are around site for No services Arab Al- location, the dumping for solid 22 201116 50 Bad Bad Bad Khouleh settlers do not waste waterr, waste, due to allow springs due to settlements rehabilitation settlements No suitable site for 23 251320 Mas-ha 2424 Good Bad Good dumping waste water No suitable No suitable location for site for 24 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 Good Bad Bad dumping solid dumping waste, due to waste water settlements Vacum tanks No permission face licences to difficulties to 25 251310 Haris 4230 Acceptable Bad Good maintain the dispose waste w carrier line water in the eastern part

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 66

Gender Perspective

Female participation in decisions (%) Female contacting LC (%) Water section SN ID Community name Population Water Sanitation Hygine Water Sanitation Hygine Existance? Female (%) 1 201210 'Izbat Salman 916 0 0 0 30 30 30 Yes 0

2 201190 'Izbat Jal'ud 149 0 0 0 10 10 10 Yes 0

3 200995 Khirbet Sir 660 20 20 20 30 30 30 Yes 0

4 201115 'Isla 1136 20 20 20 50 50 50 Yes 50

5 201100 'Azzun 9478 20 20 20 10 10 10 Yes 25

6 200985 Jayyus 3557 10 10 10 10 10 10 Yes 25

7 200905 Falamya 774 20 20 20 30 30 30 Yes 0

8 201225 'Izbat al Ashqar 461 0 0 0 20 20 20 Yes 0

9 201205 Al Mudawwar 358 0 0 0 20 20 20 Yes 0

10 201260 Sanniriya 3691 25 25 25 20 20 20 Yes 0

11 201280 'Azzun 'Atma 2115 25 25 25 40 40 40 Yes 0

12 201055 An Nabi Elyas 1431 18 18 18 0 0 0 No 13 201040 Qalqiliya 52851 0 0 0 40 40 40 Yes 4

14 251330 Iskaka 1225 18 18 18 70 70 70 Yes 33

15 301480 Bani Zeid 6163 15 15 15 60 60 60 Yes 17

16 251295 Kifl Haris 4176 18 18 18 20 20 20 No 17 251300 Marda 2429 22 22 22 50 10 10 Yes 33

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 67

Female participation in decisions (%) Female contacting LC (%) Water section SN ID Community name Population Sanitation Hygine Water Sanitation Hygine Water Sanitation Hygine

18 251400 Bruqin 4138 18 18 18 30 30 30 No

19 201035 Al Funduq 1150 20 20 20 20 0 20 No 20 201175 Kafr Thulth 5733 22 22 22 5 5 5 Yes 13

21 251425 Kafr ad Dik 5676 18 18 18 60 60 60 Yes 18

22 200965 Baqat al Hatab 1987 22 22 22 20 20 20 No

23 200945 Jit 2459 20 20 20 10 10 10 No

24 201075 'Izbat at Tabib 264 0 0 0 10 10 10 No 25 201130 Ras at Tira 495 0 0 0 5 0 0 Yes 0

26 201120 Wadi ar Rasha 155 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 27 201065 Kafr Laqif 1062 20 20 20 70 50 50 Yes 0

28 201005 A'rab ar Ramadin ash Shamali 86 20 20 20 0 0 0 Yes 0

29 201170 Ad Dab'a 421 0 0 0 20 20 20 No 30 201155 Ras 'Atiya 2177 15 15 15 10 10 10 Yes 0

31 201105 'Arab ar Ramadin al Janubi 292 20 20 20 0 0 0 No

32 201070 'Arab Abu Farda 134 20 20 20 0 0 0 No 33 201125 Habla 7216 18 18 18 1 1 1 Yes 27

34 251370 Salfit 11158 27 27 27 60 60 60 Yes 0

35 251355 Izbat Abu Adam 25 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 36 201255 Beit Amin 1308 25 25 25 10 10 10 Yes 0

37 251395 Rafat 2579 50 50 50 10 10 10 Yes 0

38 201116 Arab Al-Khouleh 50 0 0 0 0 0 0 No 39 251320 Mas-ha 2424 20 20 20 10 10 10 Yes 0

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 68

Female participation in decisions (%) Female contacting LC (%) Water section SN ID Community name Population Sanitation Hygine Water Sanitation Hygine Water Sanitation Hygine

40 251360 Az Zawiya 6169 20 20 20 30 30 30 Yes 0

41 251315 Yasuf 2140 0 0 0 70 10 70 No 42 251305 Biddya 10687 18 18 18 50 30 50 Yes 20

43 251340 Sarta 3458 11 11 11 20 20 20 No

44 251415 Farkha 1687 18 18 18 40 20 20 No

45 251310 Haris 4230 22 22 22 20 20 20 No 46 251290 Qira 1307 22 22 22 60 60 60 Yes 25

47 251430 Deir Ballut 3961 27 27 27 50 50 50 Yes 18

48 201015 Far'ata 892 22 22 22 15 15 15 No 49 201020 Immatin 2817 22 22 22 15 15 15 Yes 33

50 200970 Hajja 2719 22 22 22 80 80 80 Yes 17

51 201085 Jinsafut 2629 16 16 16 0 0 0 No 52 200925 Kafr Qaddum 3354 0 0 0 3 3 3 Yes 14

53 251250 Deir Istiya 3780 18 18 18 55 55 55 No

54 251275 Qarawat Bani Hassan 5638 0 0 0 40 20 40 No 55 251440 Khirbet Qeis 279 30 30 30 10 10 10 Yes 15

198306 15,5 15,5 15,5 25,8 22,1 24,3 11,4 15,5 24,0 11,4 Only 9 communities (Hajja, Khirbet Sir, Far’ata, Immatin, ‘Azzun, Habla, Qira, Marda, And Kafr ad Dik) are with female interviewee (16% of the surveyed communities)

WASH Assessment 2018 Page 69