DOCSLIB.ORG

Ergenekon: an Illegitimate Form of Government

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Ergenekon: an Illegitimate Form of Government COMMENTARY ERGENEKON: AN ILLEGITIMATE FORM OF GOVERNMENT Ergenekon: An Illegitimate Form of Government MARKAR ESAYAN* ABSTRACT On August 5th, 2013, an Istanbul court reached its verdict in the Ergenekon coup plot trial, handing down various prison sentences to 247 defendants, including the former Chief of Mili- tary Staff and several high-ranking members of the military’s com- mand. Although the Supreme Court of Appeals has yet to make a final decision on the 6-year legal battle, the Ergenekon trial has al- ready become part of the country’s history as a sign that anti-dem- ocratic forces, many of whom date back to the final years of the Ottoman Empire, no longer have free reign. Notwithstanding its limited scope and other shortcomings, the court’s decision marks but a humble beginning for Turkey’s acknowledgement of the dark chapters in its history, as well as a challenging struggle to replace the laws of rulers with the rule of law. he Ergenekon coup plot trial, ditional two defendants were “leaders the first serious judicial inqui- of a terrorist organization” as 32 de- Try of Turkey’s long tradition of fendants were sentenced for “plotting military coups and ‘deep state’ activ- to overthrow the government.” While ities, reached an end on August 5th, 21 out of 275 defendants were acquit- 2013. Istanbul’s 13th High Criminal ted of all charges, the Court post- Court reached its final verdict (whose poned its verdict on four fugitives. short form consisted of 503 pages) Another three defendants have lost following over 600 hearings, about a their lives over the course of hearings. total of 22 indictments. The Court is due to publish its detailed ruling in Consequently, the Court sentenced a upcoming months. The most import- total of 247 defendants, including for- ant element in the Criminal Court’s mer Chief of Military Staff Ret. Gen. verdict was its recognition of the Er- İlker Başbuğ, on charges of plotting genekon criminal network as a “ter- to overthrow the government, mem- * Columnist, rorist organization” and the sentenc- bership in a terrorist organization, Yeni Şafak ing of 193 defendants on the charge possession of explosives, unlawfully Insight Turkey of “membership in a terrorist organi- acquiring personal information, and Vol. 15 / No. 4 / zation.” The Court ruled that an ad- seizing confidential state documents. 2013, pp. 29-40 2013 Fall 29 COMMENTARY MARKAR ESAYAN genekon terrorist organization and The Ergenekon coup plot trial, subsequent judicial proceedings that spanned over the next six years. the first serious judicial inquiry of Turkey’s long tradition Initially, public opinion focused on of military coups, recognized the grenades, as media outlets dubbed the ongoing investigation as the Üm- the existence of a criminal raniye probe. Chief Prosecutor Zeker- network iya Öz, however, engaged in a deeper investigation into the discovery that eventually led to complex relation- ships, military coup plots, and action The Supreme Court of Appeals is due plans within Turkey’s deep state. to approve the Istanbul court’s ver- dict. While the defendants also have The prime suspect in the investiga- a constitutional right to apply to the tion was Retired Junior Officer Oktay European Court of Human Rights, Yıldırım who had brought the chest the legal marathon is effectively over. of grenades to the Ümraniye apart- Now let us take a look at the Ergene- ment over a year prior to its ultimate kon trial’s history and develop a more discovery. Şevki Yiğit, who saw the detailed understanding of this con- bombs while visiting his son’s Ali’s troversial court case. After all, the apartment in Istanbul and was dis- Ergenekon trial marks the beginning satisfied with Ali’s explanations, in- of a new era in Turkey’s political and formed the authorities. legal history. Ali Yiğit’s interrogation at the Police June 12th, 2007: A man by the name headquarters revealed that Meh- of Şevki Yiğit called the Gendarmerie met Demirtaş had links to Muzaffer headquarters in Trabzon Province Tekin, who was detained as part of to report that he discovered C4 ex- the Council of State’s investigation plosives and grenades on the ceiling and single-handedly blocked further of his former rental apartment in judicial inquiry, and Oktay Yıldırım, Ümraniye, a neighborhood on Istan- whose personal computer contained bul’s Asian coast. The Gendarmerie a document titled Lobi (Lobby) –a forwarded the report to the Istan- document that became public seven bul Police Department and police months later and offered detailed units raided the apartment to find, accounts of the Ergenekon terrorist as the caller claimed, 27 grenades in organization’s civilian connections. a chest. The police took Ali Yiğit, the Police units found the same docu- apartment’s last known resident, and ment with the title Ergenekon-Lobi Mehmet Demirtaş, the apartment’s on Muzaffer Tekin’s personal com- registered owner, into custody. The puter. This was the first instance in discovery marked the beginning of the investigation that the name “Er- a series of investigations into the Er- genekon” came up. 30 Insight Turkey ERGENEKON: AN ILLEGITIMATE FORM OF GOVERNMENT The prosecutor’s office filed a writ- prosecutor’s initiating of the inves- ten request with the Chief of Mili- tigation. Before engaging in a more tary Staff headquarters and asked the detailed discussion of the Ergenekon military command to clarify whether trial, however, let us take a brief tour the hand grenades were property of of the deep state’s history and analyze the Armed Forces. The headquarters the striking pattern of continuity be- did not respond. The Mechanical and tween Turkey’s deep state operations. Chemical Industry Corporation that manufactured the grenades, however, Having received a mandate from determined that they matched the ex- President Abdullah Gül to investi- plosives used in a 2006 attack against gate the Hrant Dink assassination, the offices ofCumhuriyet daily news- the State Monitoring Board (Devlet paper that took place several months Denetleme Kurulu) published its final after the explosives were delivered to report in February 2012. Believing the Ümraniye apartment. that it would contribute to readers’ understanding of the matter at hand, The prosecution located confiden- I would like to share one of my op-ed tial information regarding various pieces from that period below. Here, meetings at the Chief of Military Staff I pointed to the day when Turkey’s headquarters on a Compact Disc that deep state became institutionalized: belonged to Muzaffer Tekin. Tekin confessed to having duplicated the “In January 1913, the Gladio organi- contents from Fikret Emek, a retired zation led by Enver Pasha and Talat member of the Special Forces Com- Pasha invaded the Sublime Porte to mand. A police raid at Emek’s Es- perpetrate a military coup d’état. This kişehir residence discovered a second was when a Unionist assassin by the Ergenekon arsenal with long-range name of Yakub Cemil shot Minister weapons, hand grenades, explosives, of War Nazim Pasha between the eyes and bomb setups. and Enver Pasha put a gun to Grand Vizier Mehmed Kamil Pasha’s head. Over the course of the Ergenekon in- It was shortly after this military coup, vestigation, the police discovered a on February 13th, 1913, that the mil- total of five such arsenals across the itary junta circumvented the Parlia- country. ment of Representatives to institute a Temporary Law on the Trying of Civil Public Prosecutor Zekeriya Öz’s dil- Servants” that granted government igent work revealed deep state struc- officials immunity before the law. tures over a short period of time that several previous judicial inquiries According to the State Monitoring had failed to identify. It would be no Board, “the lack of restrictions result- exaggeration to state that the Ergene- ed in lengthy investigations that often kon investigation and trial steadily became subject to the statute of lim- remained a highly controversial issue itations” and that “legislation intend- over the six-year period following the ed to protect civil servants harmed 2013 Fall 31 COMMENTARY MARKAR ESAYAN society’s sense of justice due to its Ottoman defeat in the Balkan War practical implications.” and right before the first World War? The new government elite clearly had Thus the Board continued its striking serious plans in mind and sought im- observations: munity before the law. “The Temporary Law remained in Surely enough, the history of Turkey’s force for a total of 86 years between deep state networks represents a pat- 1913 and 1999. The law remained in tern of continuity and the aforemen- force even though the country tran- tioned Temporary Law played a cen- sitioned from a constitutional mon- tral role in constructing such an un- archy into a republic and five con- interrupted tradition. The governing stitutions, including the Ottoman elite utilized the state apparatus as a Constitution, have been replaced. criminal instrument and, depending Meanwhile, legislators included the on the specific temporary circum- Temporary Law’s contents in Article stances, perpetrated criminal acts 24 of the Law No. 657 on Civil Ser- either directly and openly or through vants and even granted civil servants the proxy of criminal gangs and or- immunity before special tribunals ganizations. When Mustafa Kemal such as military trials, jurists’ courts Pasha founded the Republic, he in- hearings, academic hearings among others. The regime of administrative herited the Unionists’ “experienced” reassurance that the Temporary Law bureaucratic class and granted them established attained constitutional control over all strategic government guarantees as Article 129 of the 1982 institutions and agencies, including Constitution stipulated: “The opening the Armed Forces and the Intelli- of a criminal investigation regarding gence Agency to this group of bu- alleged offenses perpetrated by civil reaucrats.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Turkey and the Failed Coup One Year Later | the Washington Institute
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 2835 Turkey and the Failed Coup One Year Later by Omer Taspinar, Soner Cagaptay, James Jeffrey Jul 20, 2017 Also available in Arabic ABOUT THE AUTHORS Omer Taspinar Omer Taspinar is a professor of national security strategy at the National War College, focusing on the political economy of Europe, the Middle East, and Turkey. Soner Cagaptay Soner Cagaptay is the Beyer Family fellow and director of the Turkish Research Program at The Washington Institute. James Jeffrey Ambassador is a former U.S. special representative for Syria engagement and former U.S. ambassador to Turkey and Iraq; from 2013-2018 he was the Philip Solondz Distinguished Fellow at The Washington Institute. He currently chairs the Wilson Center’s Middle East Program. Brief Analysis Watch three expert observers examine a divided Turkey one year after the failed military coup of 2016. On July 13, Omer Taspinar, Soner Cagaptay, and James F. Jeffrey addressed a Policy Forum at The Washington Institute. Taspinar is a professor at the National War College and an adjunct professor at Johns Hopkins University's School of Advanced International Studies. Cagaptay is the Beyer Family Fellow and director of the Turkish Research Program at the Institute. Jeffrey is the Institute's Philip Solondz Distinguished Fellow and a former U.S. ambassador to Turkey. The following is a rapporteur's summary of their remarks. OMER TASPINAR W hile the authoritarian trend in Turkish politics is well documented in Washington circles, Fethullah Gulen is still very enigmatic for most Americans (despite his longtime exile in Pennsylvania). Some background on the Gulen movement's marriage of convenience with President Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Justice and Development Party (AKP), therefore, provides important context.
    [Show full text]
  • Reconciling Statism with Freedom: Turkey's Kurdish Opening
    Reconciling Statism with Freedom Turkey’s Kurdish Opening Halil M. Karaveli SILK ROAD PAPER October 2010 Reconciling Statism with Freedom Turkey’s Kurdish Opening Halil M. Karaveli © Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University-SAIS, 1619 Massachusetts Ave. NW, Washington, D.C. 20036 Institute for Security and Development Policy, V. Finnbodav. 2, Stockholm-Nacka 13130, Sweden www.silkroadstudies.org “Reconciling Statism with Freedom: Turkey’s Kurdish Opening” is a Silk Road Paper published by the Central Asia-Caucasus Institute and the Silk Road Studies Program. The Silk Road Papers Series is the Occasional Paper series of the Joint Center, and ad- dresses topical and timely subjects. The Joint Center is a transatlantic independent and non-profit research and policy center. It has offices in Washington and Stockholm and is affiliated with the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of Johns Hopkins University and the Stockholm-based Institute for Security and Development Policy. It is the first institution of its kind in Europe and North America, and is firmly established as a leading research and policy center, serving a large and diverse commu- nity of analysts, scholars, policy-watchers, business leaders, and journalists. The Joint Center is at the forefront of research on issues of conflict, security, and development in the region. Through its applied research, publications, research cooperation, public lec- tures, and seminars, it functions as a focal point for academic, policy, and public dis- cussion regarding the region. The opinions and conclusions expressed in this study are those of the authors only, and do not necessarily reflect those of the Joint Center or its sponsors.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkey's Deep State
    #1.12 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey FEATURE ARTICLES TURKEY’S DEEP STATE CULTURE INTERNATIONAL POLITICS ECOLOGY AKP’s Cultural Policy: Syria: The Case of the Seasonal Agricultural Arts and Censorship “Arab Spring” Workers in Turkey Pelin Başaran Transforming into the Sidar Çınar Page 28 “Arab Revolution” Page 32 Cengiz Çandar Page 35 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Content Editor’s note 3 ■ Feature articles: Turkey’s Deep State Tracing the Deep State, Ayşegül Sabuktay 4 The Deep State: Forms of Domination, Informal Institutions and Democracy, Mehtap Söyler 8 Ergenekon as an Illusion of Democratization, Ahmet Şık 12 Democratization, revanchism, or..., Aydın Engin 16 The Near Future of Turkey on the Axis of the AKP-Gülen Movement, Ruşen Çakır 18 Counter-Guerilla Becoming the State, the State Becoming the Counter-Guerilla, Ertuğrul Mavioğlu 22 Is the Ergenekon Case an Opportunity or a Handicap? Ali Koç 25 The Dink Murder and State Lies, Nedim Şener 28 ■ Culture Freedom of Expression in the Arts and the Current State of Censorship in Turkey, Pelin Başaran 31 ■ Ecology Solar Energy in Turkey: Challenges and Expectations, Ateş Uğurel 33 A Brief Evaluation of Seasonal Agricultural Workers in Turkey, Sidar Çınar 35 ■ International Politics Syria: The Case of the “Arab Spring” Transforming into the “Arab Revolution”, Cengiz Çandar 38 Turkey/Iran: A Critical Move in the Historical Competition, Mete Çubukçu 41 ■ Democracy 4+4+4: Turning the Education System Upside Down, Aytuğ Şaşmaz 43 “Health Transformation Program” and the 2012 Turkey Health Panorama, Mustafa Sütlaş 46 How Multi-Faceted are the Problems of Freedom of Opinion and Expression in Turkey?, Şanar Yurdatapan 48 Crimes against Humanity and Persistent Resistance against Cruel Policies, Nimet Tanrıkulu 49 ■ News from hbs 53 Heinrich Böll Stiftung – Turkey Representation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Digital Populism: Trolls and Political Polarization of Twitter in Turkey
    International Journal of Communication 11(2017), 4093–4117 1932–8036/20170005 Digital Populism: Trolls and Political Polarization of Twitter in Turkey ERGİN BULUT Koç University, Turkey ERDEM YÖRÜK Koç University, Turkey University of Oxford, UK This article analyzes political trolling in Turkey through the lens of mediated populism. Twitter trolling in Turkey has diverged from its original uses (i.e., poking fun, flaming, etc.) toward government-led polarization and right-wing populism. Failing to develop an effective strategy to mobilize online masses, Turkey’s ruling Justice and Development Party (JDP/AKP) relied on the polarizing performances of a large progovernment troll army. Trolls deploy three features of JDP’s populism: serving the people, fetish of the will of the people, and demonization. Whereas trolls traditionally target and mock institutions, Turkey’s political trolls act on behalf of the establishment. They produce a digital culture of lynching and censorship. Trolls’ language also impacts pro-JDP journalists who act like trolls and attack journalists, academics, and artists critical of the government. Keywords: trolls, mediated populism, Turkey, political polarization, Twitter Turkish media has undergone a transformation during the uninterrupted tenure of the ruling Justice and Development Party (JDP) since 2002. Not supported by the mainstream media when it first came to power, JDP created its own media army and transformed the mainstream media’s ideological composition. What has, however, destabilized the entire media environment was the Gezi Park protests of summer 2013.1 Activists’ use of social media not only facilitated political organizing, but also turned the news environment upside down. Having recognized that the mainstream media was not trustworthy, oppositional groups migrated to social media for organizing and producing content.
    [Show full text]
  • The Plot Against the Generals
    THE PLOT AGAINST THE GENERALS Dani Rodrik* June 2014 On a drizzly winter day four-and-a-half years ago, my wife and I woke up at our home in Cambridge, Massachusetts, to sensational news from our native Turkey. Splashed on the first page of Taraf, a paper followed closely by the country’s intelligentsia and well-known for its anti-military stance, were plans for a military coup as detailed as they were gory, including the bombing of an Istanbul mosque, the false- flag downing of a Turkish military jet, and lists of politicians and journalists to be detained. The paper said it had obtained documents from 2003 which showed a group within the Turkish military had plotted to overthrow the then-newly elected Islamist government. The putative mastermind behind the coup plot was pictured prominently on the front page: General Çetin Doğan, my father-in-law (see picture). General Doğan and hundreds of his alleged collaborators would be subsequently demonized in the media, jailed, tried, and convicted in a landmark trial that captivated the nation and allowed Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdoğan to consolidate his power over the secular establishment. In a judgment issued in October 2013, Turkey’s court of appeals would ratify the lower court’s decision and the decades-long prison sentences it had meted out. Today it is widely recognized that the coup plans were in fact forgeries. Forensic experts have determined that the plans published by Taraf and forming the backbone of the prosecution were produced on backdated computers and Cover of Taraf on the alleged coup attempt made to look as if they were prepared in 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • Illiberal Media and Popular Constitution-Making in Turkey
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Communication Department Faculty Publication Series Communication 2020 Illiberal Media and Popular Constitution-Making in Turkey Burcu Baykurt Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/communication_faculty_pubs 1 Illiberal Media and Popular Constitution Making in Turkey 1. Introduction Popular constitution making, a process that allows for public participation as opposed to a handful of elites writing a fundamental social contract behind closed doors and imposing it on the rest of society, is tricky. It sounds like a noble idea in theory, but it is difficult to execute effectively, efficiently, and, most importantly, democratically. Even trickier are the roles of publicity and media in popular constitution making. What are the consequences of reporting during the drafting of a new constitution? In what ways could the media lend legitimacy to the process by informing the public and incorporating public opinion into the drafting of a constitution? Coupled with the rise of new media technologies, an ideal of participatory constitution making (and an active role for the media) may seem desirable, not to mention attainable, but there are myriad ways to participate, and basing a constitution on popular opinion could easily devolve into a majority of 50 percent plus one that imposes its will on the rest. The bare minimum, ideally, is to expect journalists to report on facts without bowing to political or economic pressures, but even that is easier said than done. For which audiences are these journalistic facts intended? For those leaders drafting the new constitution or the public at large? These are not easy questions to answer empirically, not only because media and communications are often neglected in studies of constitution making, but also because the relationship between the two is hard to ascertain precisely.
    [Show full text]
  • ERGENEKON, SLEDGEHAMMER, and the POLITICS of TURKISH JUSTICE: CONSPIRACIES and COINCIDENCES August 29, 2011 Gloria-Center.Org
    http://www.gloria-center.org/2011/08/ergenekon-sledgehammer-and-the-politics-of-turkish-justice-conspiracies-and-coincidences/ ERGENEKON, SLEDGEHAMMER, AND THE POLITICS OF TURKISH JUSTICE: CONSPIRACIES AND COINCIDENCES August 29, 2011 gloria-center.org Since it was launched in June 2007, the Ergenekon investigation has become the largest and most controversial case in recent Turkish history, resulting in over 300 people being charged with a membership of what is described as a clandestine terrorist organization seeking to destabilize the country’s Islamist government. In the parallel Sledgehammer investigation, 195 members of the fiercely secularist Turkish military stand accused of plotting a coup in 2003. Yet not only is the evidence in both cases deeply flawed, there are also increasing indications that much of it has been fabricated. On June 12, 2007, acting on an anonymous tip-off, the Turkish police discovered a crate of grenades in a shantytown in the Istanbul suburb of Umraniye in the beginning of what later became known as the Ergenekon investigation. By May 2011, a motley collection of over 300 people had been formally charged with membership of what public prosecutors described as the “Ergenekon terrorist organization,” which was allegedly plotting to use violence to try to destabilize the government of the moderate Islamist Justice and Development Party (JDP). In January 2010, prosecutors launched a parallel investigation into claims that members of the Turkish military had plotted to stage a coup against the JDP in early 2003. By May 2011, 195 serving and retired members of the Turkish military had been formally charged with involvement in the alleged plot.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim Trial Observation Report
    INTERIM TRIAL OBSERVATION REPORT Hearing of “Taraf” journalists Istanbul High Criminal Court October 2016 Written by Gráinne Mellon Bar Human Rights Committee 1 Bar Human Rights Committee of England and Wales Doughty Street Chambers 53-54 Doughty Street London WC1N 2LS England 2 Produced by BHRC Copyright 2016 © Contents About the Bar Human Rights Committee ...................................................................................... 4 Acknowledgements .............................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 Background ............................................................................................................................................. 8 Arrest and investigation ..................................................................................................................... 9 The hearing ........................................................................................................................................... 10 Events following the hearing .......................................................................................................... 13 Concerns ................................................................................................................................................. 14 The right of a Defendant to know the case against them................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Changing Agenda and Turkey: a Study on The
    Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 28 / 2012 Değişen Gündem ve Türkiye: Changing Agenda And Turkey: 2009 Yılı Medya Gündemi A Study On The Media Agenda Üzerine Bir İnceleme Of 2009 Mustafa YILMAZ** Aynur KÖSE*** ÖZET Enformasyonun haber formatındaki üretimi ve dağıtımı işlevini yerine getiren medya, kamusal alandaki tartışmaların en önemli belirleyicisi ve taşıyıcısı olarak kilit bir rol üstlenmektedir. Buna bağlı olarak haber medyasında öne çıkan konular ve bu konuların haberleştirilmesinde kullanılan dilsel pratikler geniş bir inceleme alanı olarak ortaya çıkmaktadır. Bu çalışmada ise medya gündeminin çok sık değiştiği ya da değiştirildiği yönündeki tartışmaların hız kazandığı bir yıl olarak 2009 yılında, yaygın medyanın değişmez konu başlıkları, bu konulardan olu şan medya gündemini kimin belirlediği, nasıl şekillendirdiği, gündemin değişim sıklığı ve hızı, haber sunumunda öne çıkan çerçeveler gibi sorulara yanıtlar aranmıştır. Bu çerçevede 1 Ocak-31 Aralık 2009 tarihleri arasında yaygın medyaya mensup Akşam, Cumhuriyet, Hürriyet, Milliyet, Posta, Radikal, Sabah, Taraf, Yeni Şafak ve Zaman gazetelerinin manşet ve sürmanşetleri içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda 2009 yılında en fazla gündemde kalan konuların Ergenekon davasına ilişkin gelişmeler ve Kürt açılımı tartışmaları olduğu saptanmıştır. Bu konuları ilk defa manşetlerine taşıyan ve uzun süre gündemde kalmasını sağlayan gazeteler ise Zaman, Taraf ve Radikal’dir. Çalışmanın ortaya çıkardığı temel bulgu, gazetelerin ateşleyici olayların
    [Show full text]
  • Dr. Ioannis N. Grigoriadis
    Room T-364 Phone : +90-312-290-1856 Dept of Political Science & Fax : +90-312-290-2742 Public Administration E-mail : [email protected] Bilkent University, Bilkent Date of Birth: 2 December 1976 Ankara, TR-06800 Turkey DR. IOANNIS N. GRIGORIADIS Education-Training: Oct 2011- Higher Board of Education, Turkish Ministry of National Education, Ankara § Associate Professor Specialization Field: “Political Life and Institutions [Siyasal Yaşam ve Kurumlar]” Sep 2002- University of London, School of Oriental & African Studies (SOAS), London Sep 2005 § Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in Politics (Supervisor: Prof. William M. Hale) Thesis Title: “Turkish Political Culture and the European Union” Aug 2000- Columbia University, School of International & Public Affairs (SIPA), New York May 2002 § Master of International Affairs (Concentrations: International Energy Management & Policy/Middle East) Aug 2000- Columbia University, The Middle East Institute, New York May 2002 § Advanced Certificate of Middle East Studies Dec 1998- Athens Court of First Instance, Athens Aug 2000 § Athens Bar Association Membership Licence Aug 1998- Hellenic Infantry Reserve Officers School (SEAP), Heraklion, Greece Dec 1998 § Certificate of Military Studies Sep 1994- National & Capodistrian University of Athens, School of Legal, Economic & Political Sciences, Athens Aug 1998 § Juris Doctor (J.D.) Teaching Experience: Sep 2009- Bilkent University, Department of Political Science & Public Administration, Ankara § Associate Professor-Jean Monnet Chair of European Studies
    [Show full text]
  • Grapes of Wrath
    #6.13 PERSPECTIVES Political analysis and commentary from Turkey THE TRANSFORMATION OF AGRICULTURE AND RURAL AREAS IN TURKEY GRAPES OF WRATH DEMOCRACY FOREIGN POLICY HUMAN LANDSCAPES The Gezi Park Resistance Objective versus Process in Turkey’s Memet Aksoy: and the Peace Process EU Membership Bid This is What Being an Artist is: Nazan Üstündağ Erhan İçener Taking Sides Page 54 Page 62 Ayşegül Oğuz Page 66 TURKEY REPRESENTATION Contents From the editor 3 ■ Cover story: The transformation of agriculture and rural areas in Turkey The dynamics of agricultural and rural transformation in post-1980 Turkey Murat Öztürk 4 Europe’s rural policies a la carte: The right choice for Turkey? Gökhan Günaydın 11 The liberalization of Turkish agriculture and the dissolution of small peasantry Abdullah Aysu 14 Agriculture: Strategic documents and reality Ali Ekber Yıldırım 22 Land grabbing Sibel Çaşkurlu 26 A real life “Grapes of Wrath” Metin Özuğurlu 31 ■ Ecology Save the spirit of Belgrade Forest! Ünal Akkemik 35 Child poverty in Turkey: Access to education among children of seasonal workers Ayşe Gündüz Hoşgör 38 Urban contexts of the june days Şerafettin Can Atalay 42 ■ Democracy Is the Ergenekon case a step towards democracy? Orhan Gazi Ertekin 44 Participative democracy and active citizenship Ayhan Bilgen 48 Forcing the doors of perception open Melda Onur 51 The Gezi Park Resistance and the peace process Nazan Üstündağ 54 Marching like Zapatistas Sebahat Tuncel 58 ■ Foreign Policy Objective versus process: Dichotomy in Turkey’s EU membership bid Erhan İcener 62 ■ Culture Rural life in Turkish cinema: A location for innocence Ferit Karahan 64 ■ Human Landscapes from Turkey This is what being an artist is: Taking Sides Memet Aksoy 66 ■ News from HBSD 69 Heinrich Böll Stiftung - Turkey Represantation The Heinrich Böll Stiftung, associated with the German Green Party, is a legally autonomous and intellectually open political foundation.
    [Show full text]
  • Media-Watch-On-Hate-Speech-May
    Media Watch on Hate Speech & Discriminatory Language May - August 2013 Report Hrant Dink Foundation Halaskargazi Cad. Sebat Apt. No. 74 D. 1 Osmanbey-Şişli 34371 Istanbul/TURKEY Phone: 0212 240 33 61 Fax: 0212 240 33 94 E-mail: [email protected] www.nefretsoylemi.org www.hrantdink.org Media Watch on Hate Speech Project Coordinators Nuran Gelişli – Zeynep Arslan Part I : Monitoring Hate Speech in the National and Local Press in Turkey İdil Engindeniz Part II: Discriminatory Discourse in Print Media Gözde Aytemur Nüfuscu Translator Melisa Akan Contributors Berfin Azdal Rojdit Barak Azize Çay İbrahim Erdoğan Eda Güldağı Merve Nebioğlu Günce Keziban Orman (statistic data analysis) Nazire Türkoğlu Yunus Can Uygun Media Watch on Hate Speech Project is funded by Friedrich Naumann Foundation, Global Dialogue, the British Embassy and Danida. The views expressed in this report do not necessarily reflect the views of the funders. CONTENTS MONITORING HATE SPEECH IN THE MEDIA 1 MONITORING HATE SPEECH IN THE NATIONAL AND LOCAL PRESS IN TURKEY 2 PART I: HATE SPEECH IN PRINT MEDIA 5 FINDINGS 6 NEWS ITEMS IDENTIFIED DURING THE PERIOD MAY-AUGUST 2013 16 EXAMPLES BY CATEGORY 24 1) ENMITY / WAR DISCOURSE Masons, communists and Jews! – Abdurrahman Dilipak 24 From EMPATHY to YOUPATHY! – Dursen Özalemdar 26 2) EXAGGERATION / ATTRIBUTION / DISTORTION German violence to the Turk – Dogan News Agency 28 ‘Do not be treacherous!’ - News Center 30 3) BLASPHEMY/ INSULT/ DENIGRATION Unwavering hatred and grudge - C. Turanlı 31 No such cowardice was ever seen before
    [Show full text]