Watershed Conditions Canyon Above the Interstate 215 2009)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Watershed Conditions Canyon Above the Interstate 215 2009) RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN 3.0 BASELINE ASSESSMENT RESULTS Watershed Conditions Canyon above the Interstate 215 2009). Approximately 4 of the crossing, drains 33,272 acres of 10.8 miles of upper Parleys Size and Land Use wooded mountainous terrain. Creek has been piped to Upper Parleys Creek flows 10.8 accommodate freeway Parleys Creek lies between miles and its two major construction. The majority of the Emigration Creek to the north headwater tributaries, Mountain upper subwatershed is forested, and Mill Creek to the south Dell Canyon and Lambs with less than 10% of the area (Figure 3.1). The upper Canyon, flow for 6.2 miles and developed and an estimated subwatershed, located in Parleys 5.3 miles respectively (SLCO overall impervious cover of Figure 3.1. Parleys Creek watershed (map from SLCO 2009). SALT LAKE CITY OCTOBER 2010 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES3-1 BIO-WEST, INC. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN 11.5% (SLCO 2009). Much of Hydrology Flows are not typically released the subwatershed lies within the out of Mountain Dell Dam except Wastach National Forest and is The hydrology of Parleys Creek when the reservoir fills during managed primarily for low- is altered by the water storage spring runoff, and during base impact recreation. The areas and flow regulation operations of flow periods the stream dries up above the Mountain Dell/Parleys Mountain Dell and Little Dell for some distance below the dam Creek confluence receive Reservoirs. Originally completed until gains from groundwater protection as a Salt Lake City in 1917, Mountain Dell Dam is a resupply surface flow. Within the water supply watershed. Other 3,000 acre-foot storage facility lower subwatershed, some significant land uses in the upper located at the confluence of additional flow regulation watershed include residential Parleys Creek and Mountain Dell capacity is provided by the 140 cabins in Lambs and Mount Aire Canyon (Figure 3.1, SLCC acre-foot pond in Sugar House Canyons, the City-owned 2010). Little Dell Dam, located Park. Mountain Dell Golf Course, just upstream of Mountain Dell gravel mining, and Reservoir, was constructed in Parleys Creek’s hydrology is transportation. Parleys Creek 1993 and impounds a 20,500 characterized by a distinct parallels Interstate 80 throughout acre-foot reservoir designed for springtime peak typical of the study area. flood control, water supply, and snowmelt-driven systems. Based recreation (SLCC 2009). The on analysis of flow data recorded The lower Parleys Creek sub- City’s Parleys Water Treatment at the County gage near Suicide watershed is much smaller, Plant (PWTP) is located just Rock from 1980-2005, mean draining 4,112 acres of primarily downstream of Mountain Dell annual flow is 14.4 cfs, average forested, residential and park Dam, and diverts water from the monthly flow is highest in May areas below the canyon mouth. reservoir to the municipal water (Figure 3.2), and base flows Lower Parleys Creek flows delivery system (SLCO 2009). average about 2 cfs. Peak daily approximately 3.3 miles; of this length about 0.7 miles has been piped to accommodate road crossings. An additional 3.7 miles of lower Parleys Creek west of the RCS study area is conveyed in engineered conduits to the Jordan River (Figure 1.1). Estimated existing impervious cover is 28.9% within the lower sub-watershed; this value is predicted to reach 32.5% by 2030 as a result of additional commercial development (SLCO 2009). More than 60% of the lower Parleys Creek subwatershed lies within the City’s municipal boundaries. Figure 3.2. Monthly flows at Salt Lake County’s gage at Suicide Rock. SALT LAKE CITY OCTOBER 2010 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES3-2 BIO-WEST, INC. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN transition to the valley. Within the RCS study area, Parleys Creek flows through areas mapped as primary and secondary groundwater recharge zones, and studies have estimated losses to groundwater to range from about 1.4 to 7 cfs (SLCO 2009). Urbanization and development throughout the watershed have affected surface water- groundwater patterns. As more of the watershed has been converted to impervious surfaces, a greater proportion of storm water runs off as surface flow rather than infiltrating into the ground, leaving less groundwater available to supply baseflow to the creek during the summer dry period (Figure 3.3). No streamflow gage exists at the downstream end of the study Figure 3.3. Relationship between impervious cover and surface area, so no quantitative data are runoff. Impervious cover in a watershed results available to characterize in increased surface runoff. Diagram and caption text hydrology after the creek flows from FISRWG 1998. through the most urbanized flow occurs on May 12th on subwatershed (SLCO 2009). portion of watershed average (SLCO 2009), and Above the PWTP Parleys Creek downstream from the Suicide average annual high flow is 105 is classified as having perennial Rock gage. However, field cfs based on analysis of the flow; below the PWTP the creek observations during storm events 1980-2005 time period. Since is classified as “perennial- suggest that flows in the lower completion of Little Dell Dam, reduced”, indicating that flows reaches of the creek can be quite however, high flows have been are artificially reduced by the “flashy”, with rapid, brief rises in more substantially regulated, with stream diversions for municipal flow during storms. This is a an average annual high flow water supply. common hydrologic pattern in value of 75 cfs for the urbanized systems (Figure 3.4). 1993–2005 time period. Because of natural alluvial deposition patterns, Wasatch No storage reservoirs are present Average annual precipitation mountain streams including on lower Parleys Creek within ranges from 22 to 42 inches in Parleys Creek also naturally lose the RCS study area, but the the upper subwatershed, and some surface flow to Sugar House Park pond serves from 11 to 22 inches in the lower groundwater where the canyons as an on-line debris basin facility SALT LAKE CITY OCTOBER 2010 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES3-3 BIO-WEST, INC. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN that traps the majority of coarse Below: Parleys Creek debris grate. sediment loads. It is estimated that the pond was last dredged in the early 1990s. Since that time, a significant volume of sediment has accumulated in the pond, reducing pond depth and capacity (L. Hemphill 2010, pers. comm.). The County regularly removes debris from the grated culvert inlet at the downstream end of reach LPC_R03 (Figure 2.1) and from a debris grate located about 500 feet upstream from that inlet. A new County debris basin facility is proposed in this area as part of the draft Comprehensive Use and Management Plan for Parleys Historic Nature Park (MGB&A et al. 2010a). Water Quality Above Mountain Dell Reservoir, Parleys Creek’s beneficial use classifications as designated by the Utah Division of Water Quality (DWQ) include 1C (high quality drinking water), 2B (secondary contact recreation), and 3A (cold water fishery). In this upper segment, the creek’s water quality is good and fully Figure 3.4. A comparison of hydrographs before and after supports all of its beneficial uses urbanization. The discharge curve is higher and steeper (DWQ 2006). Below Mountain for urban streams than for natural streams. Diagram Dell Reservoir, the designated and caption text from FISRWG 1998. beneficial uses include 2B and 3A; in this segment Parleys Creek standards for any specific water 2007). Within the Sugar House is listed as impaired and only quality constituents at this time. Park pond, outbreaks of avian partially supporting its 3A use However, the creek is subject to botulism and bacteria concerns due to habitat alterations (DWQ a variety of potential have been problems in recent 2006). contamination sources and fish years (L. Hemphill 2010, pers. kills have been documented in comm.). Within Parleys Canyon Parleys Creek is not currently the stream below Suicide Rock as in the wintertime, UDOT listed by DWQ as exceeding state recently as 2007 (Prettyman regularly salts the six lanes of SALT LAKE CITY OCTOBER 2010 DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES3-4 BIO-WEST, INC. RIPARIAN CORRIDOR STUDY FINAL PARLEYS CREEK MANAGEMENT PLAN Interstate 80, and these road salts from these newer sites have not and alluvial deposits (Bryant wash directly into Parleys Creek yet gone through quality 1990). Approximately 50 to via storm drains that do not assurance/control procedures 86.2% of the soils in the upper provide any water quality and have not been released to Parleys Creek sub-watershed treatment. The Parleys Canyon the public or comprehensively have severe to very severe soil section of I-80 is a major trucking analyzed. Bacteriological data erosion potential (SLCO 2009). route, and accidents occasionally are also collected independently involve spills that have the by DPU at three sites on Parleys Once it exits the canyon, lower potential to contaminate the Creek; a scatter plot of the DPU Parleys Creek flows through a nearby creek. Sediment inputs E.coli data is provided in Figure series of Pleistocene Lake associated with poorly stabilized 3.5. Results are highly variable, Bonneville deposits ranging from highway fill slopes, and occasional high spikes that finer-grained silt and clay unprotected/broken storm drain exceed the acute state 2B deposits to coarser sand and outlets, and dust tracked out standard (668 CFU/100 mL) gravel deposits (Bryant 1990). from the gravel pit also have have been documented at all Artificial fill material, primarily potential water quality impacts. three monitoring sites. No associated with Interstate 80, also Septic systems for the residential obvious spatial or temporal borders the stream in several of cabins in the upper watershed trends are apparent, and the the lower reaches.
Recommended publications
  • Rockport Utah a Brief History and Photographs of Homes
    ROCKPORT UTAH A BRIEF HISTORY AND PHOTOGRAPHS OF HOMES Edited and Compiled by Thomas E. Brown FORWARD Several years ago I was asked to speak at sacrament meeting program in the Peoa Ward. The Peoa members of the Daughters of the Utah Pioneers had planned the program and I was asked to speak about the pioneers in the valley. Since no one specifically asked me to speak about Peoa, I focused my remarks on my hometown of Rockport. Days were spent researching the subject. Books and documents in my possession provided a base, but additional information was needed. Much time was spent at the Church Historical Department reviewing documents and soon enough information had been collected to fill the assignment. After the meeting, several friends asked for copies of the talk. The information was not typed and it needed to be put together better. All this time I had a set of wonderful photographs showing the homes in Rockport taken by Florence Siddoway Walsh Hunter years before. The photos had been shown to friends who said they would like copies. Because of the interest in both the talk and the photos, I decided to get the history typed and the photos enlarged and labeled so they could be put together in some printed form. There may be misspelled names, wrong dates, incorrect information, omissions and a host of other problems with this document. Some problems may have existed in the materials I used and some may be of my own making. This is not a complete history in any sense of the word, but I hope you find some enjoyment and satisfaction in reviewing the history and the photos just as I have.
    [Show full text]
  • Park City, Utah 8.37 Acre Commercial Development Parcel Entitled for Five Multi-Use Buildings Totalling 209,990 Sf Gross 122,432 Sf Leasable/ Salable
    PARK CITY, UTAH 8.37 ACRE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT PARCEL ENTITLED FOR FIVE MULTI-USE BUILDINGS TOTALLING 209,990 SF GROSS 122,432 SF LEASABLE/ SALABLE Offered by: RONALD J. SHARP & ASSOCIATES Robert Holmes Associate Broker [email protected] • 435.640.6367 Kahrin Holmes [email protected] • 435.640.5370 Sales Price $8,100,000 LAND 8.37 Acre Development Parcel $22.22 / SF Gross Land Area $48.09 / SF Developable Land Area IMPROVEMENTS Recently approved entitlements for residential and commercial development of 5 buildings totaling 209,991 square feet gross/122,432 square feet leasable. $38.57/SF Gross Building Area $66.16/SF Net Leasable Area WATER 38.38 Shares (ERC’s) of Mountain Regional Water available for $403,489.00 ($10,513.00/ERC) I-80 (APPROXIMATELY 1 MILE) HWY 40 TO I-80 BLDG. D PARK CITY STORAGE BLDG. B HWY 40 UNDERGROUND PARKING DRIVE-THRU BLDG. A SILVER CREEK BUSINESS PARK UNDERGROUND PARKING BLDG. E BLDG. C FRONTAGE RD. SEATTLE SALT LAKE NEW YORK CITY CITY 80 PARK CITY • Forbes Magazine released its CHICAGO annual BEST STATES FOR BUSINESS AND CAREERS ranking Utah #1 for the 3rd SAN HEBER consecutive year. Rankings FRANCISCO CITY are based on six primary categories: business costs, PROVO PHOENIX economic climate, growth SAN prospects, labor, quality of life DIEGO ATLANTA and regulatory environment. DALLAS • Utah was named the TOP STATE FOR ECONOMIC 70 OUTLOOK for the 5th ORLANDO consecutive year by ALEC- Laffer State Economic Index; FLIGHT TIMES “Rich States, Poor States.” for SALT LAKE CITY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT: Business Facilities Magazine ATLANTA ...............................3:40 HRS ORLANDO ............................4:20 HRS SAN DIEGO ..........................1:54 HRS 15 • ranked Utah #1 overall for its CHICAGO ..............................3:01 HRS PHOENIX ..............................1:31 HRS SAN FRANCISCO ..............1:42 HRS DALLAS ..................................2:30 HRS NEW YORK ..........................4:27 HRS SEATTLE ...............................1:54 HRS PRO-BUSINESS CLIMATE.
    [Show full text]
  • Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003
    Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003 Weber River Project, Summit County, Utah Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah September 2009 Mission Statements The mission of the Department of the Interior is to protect and provide access to our Nation’s natural and cultural heritage and honor our trust responsibilities to Indian Tribes and our commitments to island communities. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Echo Dam, Weber River Project Summit County, Utah, Safety of Dams Modification, Environmental Assessment and Finding of No Significant Impact PRO-EA-05-003 Weber River Project, Summit County, Utah Upper Colorado Region Provo Area Office Contact Person W. Russ Findlay Provo Area Office 302 East 1860 South Provo, Utah 84606 801-379-1084 U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Provo Area Office Provo, Utah September 2009 Contents Page Chapter 1 – Need for Proposed Action and Background.................................. 1 1.1 Introduction........................................................................................... 1 1.2 Dam Safety Program Overview............................................................ 1 1.2.1 Safety of Dams NEPA Compliance Requirements..................... 2 1.3 Purpose of and Need for the Proposed Action...................................... 2 1.4 Description of Echo Dam and Reservior .............................................. 2 1.4.1 Echo Dam.................................................................................... 3 1.4.2 Echo Reservoir............................................................................ 5 1.4.3 Normal Operations.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A History of Morgan County, Utah Centennial County History Series
    610 square miles, more than 90 percent of which is privately owned. Situated within the Wasatch Mountains, its boundaries defined by mountain ridges, Morgan Countyhas been celebrated for its alpine setting. Weber Can- yon and the Weber River traverse the fertile Morgan Valley; and it was the lush vegetation of the pristine valley that prompted the first white settlers in 1855 to carve a road to it through Devils Gate in lower Weber Canyon. Morgan has a rich historical legacy. It has served as a corridor in the West, used by both Native Americans and early trappers. Indian tribes often camped in the valley, even long after it was settled by Mormon pioneers. The southern part of the county was part of the famed Hastings Cutoff, made notorious by the Donner party but also used by Mormon pioneers, Johnston's Army, California gold seekers, and other early travelers. Morgan is still part of main routes of traffic, including the railroad and utility lines that provide service throughout the West. Long known as an agricultural county, the area now also serves residents who commute to employment in Wasatch Front cities. Two state parks-Lost Creek Reservoir and East A HISTORY OF Morgan COUY~Y Linda M. Smith 1999 Utah State Historical Society Morgan County Commission Copyright O 1999 by Morgan County Commission All rights reserved ISBN 0-913738-36-0 Library of Congress Catalog Card Number 98-61320 Map by Automated Geographic Reference Center-State of Utah Printed in the United States of America Utah State Historical Society 300 Rio Grande Salt Lake City, Utah 84 101 - 1182 Dedicated to Joseph H.
    [Show full text]
  • Valleys of Utah Lake and Jordan River, Utah
    Water-Supply and Irrigation Paper No. 157 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY CHARLES D. WALCOTT, DlKKCTOK UNDERGROUND WATER IN THE VALLEYS OF UTAH LAKE AND JORDAN RIVER, UTAH BY G. B. RICHARDSON WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1906 CONTENTS. Page. Introduction.......................... 5 Topography and drainage.............. 5 Geology.............................. 7 Literature........................ Descriptive geology of the highlands Late geologic history.............. 11 Tertiary..................... 11 Quaternary.................... 11 Climate.............................. 13 Precipitation.. 14 Temperature.. 15 Wind velocity. 16 Humidity..... 16 Evaporation-.. 17 Summary..... 17 Hydrography...... 18 Streams tributary to Utah Lake and Jorc an River. 18 Utah Lake.................... 23 Jordan River.................. 24 Great Salt Lake................ 25 Underground water.................. 27 General conditions............. 27 Source.................... 27 Distribution............... 29 Quality................... 30 Recovery................. 35 Suggestions................. 38 Occurrence.................... 38 West of Jordan .River........ 38 Divisions of area....... 38 Upland area............ 39 Lowland area.......... 41 East of Jordan River........ 43 Salt Lake City......... 43 South of Salt Lake City. 45 Utah Lake Valley........... 48 Lehi and vicinity. 48 American Fork, Pleasant Grove, and vicinity. 49 Provo and vicinity....... i- 51 Springville and vicinity... 52 Spanish Fork, Payson, and vicinity.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah History Encyclopedia
    THE MORMON TRAIL IN UTAH The Utah portion of the Old Mormon Trail remains the best-known and most famous section of the several emigrant trails (which total more than 10,000 miles) used by the Mormons in their migrations during the nineteenth century. This Utah trail is a seventy-mile-long natural highway, a chain of defiles commencing just west of The Needles at the mouth of Coyote Creek Canyon at the Wyoming state line, and including Cache Cave Creek Draw, Echo Canyon, Weber River Valley, Main Canyon, East Canyon, Little Emigration Canyon, and Emigration Canyon. These natural features form a passage that meanders through the forbidding Wasatch Range of the Rockies, the last barrier to the new Mormon Zion in the Valley of the Great Salt Lake. The route of the pioneers is easy to follow, except for a four-mile hike up Little Emigration Canyon. Unfortunately, however, few of the original wagon ruts have been preserved. The longest single section of this trail is in the twenty-five-mile-long Echo Canyon; with all of the subsequent road and rail widenings, however, the original track is long gone. In 1846 the trail essentially was blazed by the Donner-Reed party to what is now known as Donner Hill near the mouth of Emigration Canyon. The Mormons of 1847 actually blazed only about one mile of the entire trail from Nauvoo to Salt Lake City – the remaining mile from Donner Hill into the valley. Along this trail travelers may wish to note and visit many of the twenty­ four historic sites and/or markers.
    [Show full text]
  • Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs
    SALT LAKE CITY PARKS & PUBLIC LANDS NEEDS ASSESSMENT December 2018 SALT LAKE CITY PARKS & PUBLIC LANDS NEEDS ASSESSMENT December 2018 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SALT LAKE CITY COUNCIL LANDMARK DESIGN CONSULTANT TEAM District 1 - James Rogers Mark Vlasic, ASLA, PLA, AICP Principal-in-Charge District 2 - Andrew Johnston Jennifer Hale, ASLA, PLA Project Manager District 3 - Chris Wharton Lisa Benson, ASLA, PLA, AICP Senior Planner District 4 - Derek Kitchen Siri Vlasic, Intern District 5 - Erin Mendenhall District 6 - Charlie Luke District 7 - Amy Fowler LEWIS, YOUNG, ROBERTSON & BURNINGHAM Fred Philpott, Vice President Teresa Pinkal, Analyst SALT LAKE CITY MAYOR’S OFFICE Mayor Jackie Biskupski Y2 ANALYTICS Scott Riding, Managing Partner Kyrene Gibb, Director of Research SALT LAKE CITY PARKS & PUBLIC LANDS MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE Nancy Monteith, Landscape Architect, Project Manager Kristin Riker, Director Brandon Fleming, PPL Office Facilitator & GIS Coordinator Tyler Murdock, PPL Project Coordinator Nole Walkingshaw, PPL Administrative Services & Communications Manager Lewis Kogan, PPL Natural lands Program Manager Kathy Rollman, Park Usage Coordinator Troy Baker, PPL Maintenance Program Manager Kyle Shields, PPL Maintenance Program Manager RESIDENTS OF SALT LAKE CITY Salt Lake City Parks & Public Lands Needs Assessment i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................iii 5.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS .................................................... 91 5.1 Citywide Summary .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Guide to the Central Wasatch Front Canyons
    Introduction . 1 Striking beauty, abundant recreational opportunities, historic mining and Overview Map . 2 pioneer locales, and a unique geologic story stretching back over one bil- Geologic Story . 3 lion years make Salt Lake County’s Wasatch Front canyons a world-class Lake Bonneville . 4 attraction. Glaciers . 5 This guide highlights the six canyons open to vehicles. Topical pages Faults . 7 present the region’s fascinating geologic history and active processes, Landslides . 8 while descriptions and maps with road mileage further explain each Mining History . 9 canyon’s geology. Stone Quarries . 10 Enjoy your tours. Rocks Discussed in this Guide . 12 William F. Case – Emigration, Parleys, and Mill Creek Canyons City Creek Canyon (text) . 13 Sandra N. Eldredge – Big Cottonwood Canyon Mark R. Milligan – City Creek Canyon Emigration and Lower Parleys Canyons (text) . 15 Christine Wilkerson – Little Cottonwood Canyon Mill Creek Canyon (text) . 17 Big Cottonwood Canyon (text) . 19 Driving conditions to be aware of include narrow roads combined with heavy bicycle Little Cottonwood Canyon (text) . 21 traffic in City Creek, Emigration, and Mill Creek Canyons; and high-speed highway traffic in Parleys Canyon. Description of Map Units . 23 No dogs are allowed in Big Cottonwood, Little Cottonwood, and upper City Creek City Creek Canyon (map) . 24 Canyons because the areas are culinary watersheds. Emigration and Lower Parleys Canyons (map) . 25 For other regulations regarding recreation: Contact the Salt Lake Ranger District of the Wasatch-Cache National Forest for Mill Mill Creek Canyon (map) . 26 Creek, Big Cottonwood, and Little Cottonwood Canyons. Big Cottonwood Canyon (map) . 27 Contact the Salt Lake City Department of Public Utilities for City Creek Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • An Early History of the Community of Park City, Utah
    Brigham Young University BYU ScholarsArchive Theses and Dissertations 1969 An Early History of the Community of Park City, Utah Oscar F. Jesperson Jr. Brigham Young University - Provo Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd Part of the Anthropology Commons, History Commons, Mormon Studies Commons, and the Sociology Commons BYU ScholarsArchive Citation Jesperson, Oscar F. Jr., "An Early History of the Community of Park City, Utah" (1969). Theses and Dissertations. 4827. https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/etd/4827 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. ANAN EARLY HISTORY OF THE COMMUNITY OF PARK city9CITY UTAH izltd102 2 A thesis submitted to the department of history brigham young university prolprowprovo utah in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of master of art by oscar F jespersonJesjespersongpersong jr august 1969 PREFACE while books and theses have been written on the mines and some of the individuals associated with park city there iisi s something lacking an incompleteness about the story of park city utahitahoutaho it was not a boom or temporary town as were so many other mining communities in the western united states park city was differentdifferdifferentodifferenthoento not only was this a gentile town in the heart of mormon country
    [Show full text]
  • CLOUDBURST FLOODS in UTAH 1850-1938 by RALF R
    UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR J. A. Krug, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. E. Wrather, Director Water-Supply Paper 994 CLOUDBURST FLOODS IN UTAH 1850-1938 By RALF R. WOOLLEY With a chapter on physiographic features By RAY E. MARSELL and a FOREWORD by NATHAN C. CROVER UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1946 For sale by the Supt. of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington 25, D. C. Price $1.50 CLOUDBURST a definition The term "cloudburst" is commonly used to designate a tor­ rential downpour of rain which by its spottiness and relatively high intensity suggests the bursting and discharge of a whole cloud at once. Cloudbursts are usually associated with thunder­ storms; they may occur anywhere but generally over a relatively small area. They are common in the hilly and mountainous dis­ tricts of the West, and the resulting floods pouring out from the small precipitous catchment basins are flashy and often destructive. CONTENTS Page Cloudburst a definition____-___---__--__-_______--_--_-__-__..-.._..,-_-_ ii Foreword, by Nathan C. Grover---.-...-..----__________________________ 1 Abstract.________-_-___----------__--_---_-_---_-_-..-.. ___-_-._____ 5 Authorization ___________________..___..---__--____-_-_..________ ._-______ 7 Administration and personnel____________________________________________ 7 Scope of report.___________-_--_---_----_____--_-_-_---_--_-_____---__- 8 Cooperation and basic data.---_--_--_-------_-_---------_--_..__--___-_- 9 Previous studies____-____---_-_-------_-_--_---------___.-..---_---_--
    [Show full text]
  • Parley's Interchange Alternative Development Public Comments
    Parley's Interchange Alternative Development Public Comments This document provides a copy of the comments received during the 30-day comment period for the Parley's EIS Preliminary Alternatives. UDOT is reviewing and considering these comments as they refine the project alternatives. Comments received after the 30-day comment period will be reviewed and considered. There will be additional opportunities to provide comments during the Draft EIS public comment period in the summer of 2019. PARLEY’S INTERCHANGE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT I-80/I-215 Eastside Comment #1 Date: 7/12/2018 Source: Phone Name: Joshua Stewart Comments: I am opposed to widening of Foothill. We need to be discouraging people from travelling here rather than encouraging them. Comment #2 Date: 7/18/2018 Source: Email Name: Emily W. Allen Comments: Just writing to indicate my opposition to the current alternatives for the I-80/ I-215 redesign which may impact my neighbors and the Grandeur Peak trailhead. Thanks! Emily Allen Comment #3 Date: 7/18/2018 Source: Email Name: Jen Schmidt Comments: To Whom It May Concern: I would like to formally voice concern and object to any plans that may put at-risk homes or trailheads as a result of the Parley’s reconstruction. I live in a home that could potentially be impacted. I also love this area for recreation, and I am not alone. There are many, many individuals who enjoy Wasatch Blvd as well as Grandeur Peak for all sorts of recreation activities. Please do not consider any plans that would put these amazing areas at risk.
    [Show full text]
  • NEPA--Environmental Assessment
    United States Environmental Department of Agriculture Forest Assessment Service February 2015 Mill Creek Dam Removal and Restoration Project Salt Lake Ranger District, Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake County, Utah Lead Agency: USDA-Forest Service Uinta-Wasatch-Cache National Forest Salt Lake Ranger District 6944 South 3000 East, Salt Lake City, UT 84121 Responsible Official: Catherine Kahlow, Salt Lake District Ranger (801) 733-2660 Contact Information: Paul Cowley, Project Leader (801) 999-2177 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 – PURPOSE AND NEED ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]