Artigo3 Unidadespara

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Artigo3 Unidadespara Molecular Ecology (2008) 17, 3448–3463 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03841.x AssessmentBlackwell Publishing Ltd of genetic diversity in the critically endangered Australian corroboree frogs, Pseudophryne corroboree and Pseudophryne pengilleyi, identifies four evolutionarily significant units for conservation MATTHEW J. MORGAN,*§ DAVID HUNTER,† ROD PIETSCH,† WILLIAM OSBORNE‡ and J. SCOTT KEOGH* *School of Botany and Zoology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia, †New South Wales Department of Environment and Climate Change, PO Box 2115, Queanbeyan, NSW 2620, Australia, ‡Institute for Applied Ecology, University of Canberra, Canberra, ACT 2106, Australia Abstract The iconic and brightly coloured Australian northern corroboree frog, Pseudophryne pengilleyi, and the southern corroboree frog, Pseudophryne corroboree are critically endan- gered and may be extinct in the wild within 3 years. We have assembled samples that cover the current range of both species and applied hypervariable microsatellite markers and mitochondrial DNA sequences to assess the levels and patterns of genetic variation. The four loci used in the study were highly variable, the total number of alleles observed ranged from 13 to 30 and the average number of alleles per locus was 19. Expected heterozygosity of the four microsatellite loci across all populations was high and varied between 0.830 and 0.935. Bayesian clustering analyses in STRUCTURE strongly supported four genetically distinct populations, which correspond exactly to the four main allopatric geographical regions in which the frogs are currently found. Individual analyses performed on the separate regions showed that breeding sites within these four regions could not be separated into distinct populations. Twelve mtND2 haplotypes were identified from 66 individuals from throughout the four geographical regions. A statistical parsimony network of mtDNA haplotypes shows two distinct groups, which correspond to the two species of corroboree frog, but with most of the haplotype diversity distributed in P. pengilleyi. These results demonstrate an unexpectedly high level of genetic diversity in both species. Our data have important implications for how the genetic diversity is managed in the future. The four evolutionarily significant units must be protected and maintained in captive breeding programmes for as long as it is possible to do. Keywords: Anuran, Australia, conservation genetics, frog, microsatellite, mitochondrial DNA, Myobatrachidae Received 24 March 2008; revision received 6 May 2008; accepted 20 May 2008 Griffiths 2005). Australia has a highly diverse and Introduction species-rich frog fauna and a number of species have The recent decline of frogs worldwide is now well declined significantly over the last 30 years. Two iconic established but the causes of this decline remain unclear species in particular have been the subject of considerable (Alford & Richards 1999; Stuart et al. 2004; Beebee & concern because their decline has been so rapid and extreme. The northern corroboree frog, Pseudophryne pengilleyi, and the southern corroboree frog, Pseudophryne Correspondence: A/Prof. J. Scott Keogh, Fax: 61-2-6125-5573; E-mail: [email protected] corroboree (Family Myobatrachidae), are small, pond- §Present Address: Section of Integrative Biology, University of breeding and very brightly coloured terrestrial frogs Texas, Austin, TX 78712-1100, USA restricted parts of the alpine and subalpine regions of the © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd CONSERVATION GENETICS OF THE ENDANGERED CORROBOREE FROGS 3449 Fig. 1 Map showing disjunct distributions of P. pengilleyi and P. corroboree and the locations of historical records of now extinct populations (white dots) and the 41 sample sites used in the genetic analyses (black dots). Site names and haplotypes correspond to the codes in Table 1. southern highlands of New South Wales and the Australian monitoring as part of a recovery programme has documented Capital Territory in Australia (Woodruff 1975; Osborne further declines in both species. A recent census, taken in 1989) (Fig. 1). Pseudophryne pengilleyi is known from sites the summer of 2006, found the number of calling male within three disjunct geographical regions; the Fiery Ranges, P. corroboree to have fallen from 450 frogs at 79 sites in 1999 the Northern Brindabella Ranges and Southern Brindabella to just 39 frogs at 14 sites in 2006 (Hunter et al. 2006), making Ranges, whereas P. corroboree is known only from sites within this species possibly the most critically endangered ver- the Snowy Mountains (Fig. 1). Once considered a single tebrate in Australia. Declines in P. pengilleyi numbers have species, populations now considered P. pengilleyi have been been equally severe in several parts of this species’ range taxonomically distinguished from P. corroboree based on with the most recent census data finding fewer than 450 hybridization experiments (Osborne & Norman 1991), calling males across this species’ known distribution (Hunter morphology (Pengilley 1966; Woodruff 1975; Osborne et al. et al. 2006). The disease chytridomycosis, caused by infection 1996), call structure (Osborne et al. 1996) and genetic data with the Amphibian Chytrid Fungus (Batrachochytrium including allozymes and immunological distance (Roberts dendrobatidis), has been identified as the primary causal & Maxson 1989; Daly et al. 1990; Osborne & Norman 1991). factor in the decline of both corroboree frog species The rapid decline of both species of corroboree frog is (Hunter 2007). The initial decline of these species coincided noteworthy because it has been so well documented. with the first appearance of this disease in populations Observations until 1966 indicated that both species were (Hunter 2007), and also with the decline of other frog abundant and occurred in large numbers during the species in the Australian Alps (Osborne et al. 1999) and breeding season (Colefax 1956; Pengilley 1966), but numbers elsewhere along the eastern ranges of Australia which have of P. corroboree in the Snowy Mountains and P. pengilleyi been attributed to chytridomycosis (Berger et al. 1998). in the Brindabella Ranges had declined markedly by the In response to the continued decline and critically low 1980s (Osborne 1989; Osborne et al. 1999). Population population size, a captive husbandry programme has © 2008 The Authors Journal compilation © 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd 3450 M. J. MORGAN ET AL. commenced. This recovery action currently includes (Woodworth et al. 2002; Gilligan & Frankham 2003). In (i) collection of eggs from the wild each summer with particular, the maintenance of high genetic diversity in captive rearing of tadpoles through to metamorphosis captivity is important to the long-term viability of popu- and subsequent re-introduction of frogs to the wild, and (ii) lations because it may enable populations to adapt in establishment of a captive breeding colony for producing response to environmental changes, and low heterozygosity frogs for re-introduction. Saving species from extinction is directly linked to reduced population fitness in many through captive breeding and re-introduction is a highly con- species, including frogs (Reed & Frankham 2003; Halverson troversial conservation tool (Fischer & Lindenmayer 2000; et al. 2006; Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2006). Seigel & Dodd 2002), although the introduction of cap- A previous allozyme study of seven wild corroboree tive-bred individuals has been successful in the Mallorcan frog populations (Osborne & Norman 1991) found: (i) no midwife toad, Alytes muletensis (Bloxan & Tonge 1995; private alleles, but significant differences in allele frequencies Kraaijeveld-Smit et al. 2005, 2006). between frogs in the Snowy Mountains region and those in An understanding of the magnitude and patterns of the northern regions at five of seven loci; (ii) some evidence genetic diversity among populations is critical for conser- of genetic differentiation between populations in allopatric vation efforts attempting to maintain evolutionarily viable geographical regions, that is, those the Fiery Ranges and species (Avise 2004). Pond-breeding amphibians such as those in the Brindabella Ranges; (iii) little genetic differen- corroboree frogs often employ distinct environments tiation between populations within geographical regions; for breeding, development and adult survival. Breeding and (iv) levels of genetic diversity (number of polymorphic habitat is typically distributed patchily throughout a species loci, heterozygosity, average number of alleles per locus) range, and landscape features that affect the genetic in P. corroboree within the Snowy Mountains region to be connectivity of populations, as well as life-history charac- lower than P. pengilleyi in the Fiery Ranges and Brindabella teristics of the individual species, can have a major effect on Ranges. population structure. Recent studies of genetic structure in Osborne & Norman’s (1991) study encompassed only pond-breeding amphibians have shown that some species seven populations: two in the Fiery Ranges (Cromwell Hill may show significant genetic structure across small geo- and Broken Cart), two in the Brindabellas (Coree Flats and graphical distances whereas others show little structure Ginini Flats), and three in the Snowy Mountains (Maragale across similar scales (Rowe et al. 2000; Newman & Squire Range, Ogilive’s Creek and Mount Jagungal). Here we 2001; Burns et
Recommended publications
  • Recommendations for Conservation Translocations of Australian Frogs
    Recommendations for conservation translocations of Australian frogs Dr Ben Scheele, Emily Hoffmann, Dr Matt West June 2021 Cite this publication as: Scheele, B., Hoffmann, E., West, M., 2021. Recommendations for conservation translocations of Australian frogs. NESP Threatened Sprecies Recovery Hub Project 3.3.6 report, Brisbane. Cover image: Spotted tree frog on burnt log. Image: Matt West 2 Contents Background ........................................................................................................................................................................................................ 4 Australian frog declines ......................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Role and types of conservation translocations ............................................................................................................................... 4 Translocations of Australian frogs ....................................................................................................................................................... 5 Recommendations .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Step 1. Set clear, measurable translocation objectives Chytrid-specific considerations ...................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001-2002 (PDF
    2001 2002 Annual report NSW national Parks & Wildlife service Published by NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220 Copyright © National Parks and Wildlife Service 2002 ISSN 0158-0965 Coordinator: Christine Sultana Editor: Catherine Munro Design and layout: Harley & Jones design Printed by: Agency Printing Front cover photos (from top left): Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS); Bouddi National Park (J Winter/NPWS); Banksias, Gibraltar Range National Park Copies of this report are available from the National Parks Centre, (P Green/NPWS); Launch of Backyard Buddies program (NPWS); Pacific black duck 102 George St, The Rocks, Sydney, phone 1300 361 967; or (P Green); Beyers Cottage, Hill End Historic Site (G Ashley/NPWS). NPWS Mail Order, PO Box 1967, Hurstville 2220, phone: 9585 6533. Back cover photos (from left): Python tree, Gossia bidwillii (P Green); Repatriation of Aboriginal remains, La Perouse (C Bento/Australian Museum); This report can also be downloaded from the NPWS website: Rainforest, Nightcap National Park (P Green/NPWS); Northern banjo frog (J Little). www.npws.nsw.gov.au Inside front cover: Sturt National Park (G Robertson/NPWS). Annual report 2001-2002 NPWS mission G Robertson/NPWS NSW national Parks & Wildlife service 2 Contents Director-General’s foreword 6 3Conservation management 43 Working with Aboriginal communities 44 Overview Joint management of national parks 44 Mission statement 8 Aboriginal heritage 46 Role and functions 8 Outside the reserve system 47 Customers, partners and stakeholders
    [Show full text]
  • National Parks Association of the Australian Capital Territory Inc
    Volume 53 Number 2 June 2016 National Parks Association of the Australian Capital Territory Inc. Burning Aranda Bushland Canberra Nature Map Jagungal Wilderness NPA Bulletin Volume 53 number 2 June 2016 Articles by contributors may not necessarily reflect association opinion or objectives. CONTENTS NPA outings program, June – September 2016 ...............13–16 From the Committee ................................................................2 Bushwalks Rod Griffiths and Christine Goonrey Exciting Rendezvous Valley pack walk ..........................17 The vital work of the National Parks Australia Council ..........3 Esther Gallant Rod Griffiths Mount Tantangara ...........................................................18 NPA's Nature Play program .....................................................3 Brian Slee Graham Scully Pretty Plain ......................................................................19 Aranda Bushland's recent hazard-reduction burn ....................4 Brian Slee Judy Kelly, with Michael Doherty and John Brickhill Glenburn Precinct news..........................................................20 Obituaries .................................................................................6 Col McAlister Book reviews. Leaf Litter, exploring the Mysteries................21 The National Rock Garden ......................................................7 of a Hidden World by Rachel Tonkin Compiled by Kevin McCue Judy Kelly Stolen .......................................................................................7
    [Show full text]
  • Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens
    Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens A nationally threatened ecological community Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 Policy Statement 3.16 This brochure is designed to assist land managers, owners and occupiers to identify, assess and manage the Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens, an ecological community listed under Australia’s national environment law, the Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act). The brochure is a companion document to the listing advice which can be found at the Australian Government’s Species Profile and Threats Database (SPRAT). Please go to the Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community profile in SPRAT, then click on the ‘Details’ link: www.environment.gov.au/cgi-bin/sprat/public/publiclookupcommunities.pl • The Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community is found in small pockets in the high country of Tasmania, Victoria, New South Wales and the Australian Capital Territory. • The Alpine Sphagnum Bogs and Associated Fens ecological community can usually be defined by the presence or absence of sphagnum moss. • Long term conservation and restoration of this ecological community is essential in order to protect vital inland water resources. • Implementing favourable land use and management practices is encouraged at sites containing this ecological community. Disclaimer The contents of this document have been compiled using a range of source materials. This document is valid as at August 2009. The Commonwealth Government is not liable for any loss or damage that may be occasioned directly or indirectly through the use of or reliance on the contents of the document. © Commonwealth of Australia 2009 This work is copyright.
    [Show full text]
  • Ginini Flats Wetlands Ramsar Site
    PLAN OF MANAGEMENT 2001 Ginini Flats Wetlands Ramsar Site Department of Urban Services Conservation Series No. 18 Government GININI FLATS WETLANDS RAMSAR SITE Plan of Management May 2001 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS A preliminary draft of this Plan of Management was prepared for Environment ACT byDr Bob Banens, Mr Allen Fox and Dr Laslo Nagy of the Atech Group with advice from Mr Roger Good and Ms Jane Gough. Comments and contributions on the drafts were provided by staff from Environment ACT, the Nature Conservation and Namadgi Sub-committee of the Environment Advisory Committee, the Flora and Fauna Committee and various ACT community groups and individuals. The development of this management plan was funded through the National Wetlands Program of Environment Australia. NOTES This plan of management has been prepared to fulfill the principle obligation of Contracting Parties to the Ramsar Convention. This obligation is to develop management plans for all Ramsar sites in their territory. Also, this Plan constitutes a component of the management plan for Namadgi National Park. The implementation of the management actions stated in this Plan of Management will be undertaken as part of the management of the Namadgi National Park. ISSN 1036-0441 Australian Capital Territory, Canberra 2001 This work is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, no part may be reproduced by any process without written permission from the Manager, Library and Information Management, Department of Urban Services, ACT Government, GPO Box 158, Canberra City, ACT 2601. Published by Publishing Services for Environment ACT (BDM 0778) 120 A4, 05/01 (01/0882) Environment ACT Home Page: http:www.act.gov.au/environ Environment ACT Helpline: 02 6207 9777 Pi d R ldP CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………………………… II NOTES………..……………………………………………………………………………………… II CONTENTS………………………………………………………………………………………… III ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………………….… V VISION……………………………………………………………………………………………… VI 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Vol. 2.3, 1972. 30 C Terms and Conditions of Use
    Vol. 2.3, 1972. 30 c Terms and Conditions of Use Copies of Walk magazine are made available under Creative Commons - Attribution Non-Commercial Share Alike copyright. Use of the magazine. You are free: • To Share -to copy, distribute and transmit the work • To Remix- to adapt the work Under the following conditions (unless you receive prior written authorisation from Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc.): • Attribution- You must attribute the work (but not in any way that suggests that Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. endorses you or your use of the work). • Noncommercial- You may not use this work for commercial purposes. • Share Alike- If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one. Disclaimer of Warranties and Limitations on Liability. Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. makes no warranty as to the accuracy or completeness of any content of this work. Melbourne Bushwalkers Inc. disclaims any warranty for the content, and will not be liable for any damage or loss resulting from the use of any content. WALKERS! SEE THE PEOPLE WHO CARE o o o molonys BOOTS RUCKSACKS SLEEPING BAGS TENTS STOVES CLOTHING FOOD MAPS YES WE HIRE WALKING GEAR ALL THE GREAT NAMES FAIRY DOWN - PADDYMADE - BLACKS - FLINDERS RANGES HAWKINS - MOUNTAIN MULE - KARRIMOR - OPTIMUS molonys 197 ELIZABETH STREET, MELBOURNE (OPPOSITE G.P.O.) Telephone: 67 8428 (3 lines) Vol. 13, 1971 ·.:o··~--, .. -,,~~f--C,•-'-1"~·.-•·_- !'- -:"'.~.iL~-...-~ --·\...- .•. .\~~ .... ·. •"'.' Editor: Athol Schafer. Advertising: G. Kenafacke. Distribution: Rex Filson. All enquiries to: Melbourne Bushwalkers, Box 1751Q, G.P.O., Melbourne, 3001. WALK is a voluntary, non-profit venture published by the Melbourne Bushwalkers in the interests of bushwalking as a healthy and enjoyable recreation.
    [Show full text]
  • Controversies Over the Name of Mount Kosciuszko
    Controversies over the name of Mount Kosciuszko Andrzej Kozek 2020-03-26 The story we are going to tell is about visibility of the highest peak of the continental Australia, Mt Kosciuszko (2228 m), from all directions around because this is the key to understanding where all the troubles with naming of the mountain came from. The tourism industry is another factor. Tourism Industry in Australia became an important component of Australian economy. In the year to June 2019, there were over 8.5 million international visitors in Australia, an increase of 3% from 2018. Tourism contributed 8.0% of Australia's total export earnings in 2010-11. Australian Alps with the highest Australian continental peak, Mt Kosciuszko belong to the icons attracting tourists [1,2]. Often over 1000 tourists visit Mt Kosciuszko on summer weekend days. Clearly the walk from Thredbo is the most popular one. Chair lifting over 560 m to level 1930 m [3], then a comfortable walk 5 km over elevated steel mesh way to Rawson Pass (2124 m) with ecological toilets brings you to the final 1.5 km on a maintained road to the top of Australia. The metal walkways have been built in the 1980’s. What a cute description of the walk has been found on the internet. Climbing Mount Kosciuszko is worth doing. It is pleasant. It is easy. It is hugely enjoyable. And, when you have done it, you can bask in the glory that once you stood on the highest point between the Andes and the East African Plateau.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Corroboree Frog Pseudophryne Pengilleyi Review of Current Information in NSW May 2010
    NSW SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Northern Corroboree Frog Pseudophryne pengilleyi Review of Current Information in NSW May 2010 Current status: The Northern Corroboree Frog Pseudophryne pengilleyi (Wells & Wellington 1985) is currently listed as Vulnerable under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and as Endangered in the Australian Capital Territory (ACT) under the Nature Conservation Act 1980 (NC Act). The NSW Scientific Committee recently determined that the Northern Corroboree Frog meets criteria for listing as Critically Endangered under the NSW Threatened Species Conservation Act 1995 (TSC Act), based on information contained in this report and other information available for the species. Species description: The Northern Corroboree Frog is a small frog, adults reaching a length of between 2.5 to 3 cm. The species has a distinctive dorsal colouring of greenish-yellow with shiny black stripes that are frequently broken and interconnected (Pengilley 1966; Cogger 1992). This pattern extends over the limbs and flanks. The underside is marbled with black and white, or black and yellow. A large flat femoral gland is present on each hind limb and the inner metatarsal tubercle is low, round and not shovel-shaped. The inner toe has a single phalanx. The lime-yellow, narrow broken pattern of stripes of the Northern Corroboree Frog distinguishes it from the Southern Corroboree Frog P. corroboree which is brighter yellow and has a broader unbroken striped dorsal pattern (Osborne 1991). In addition, P. pengilleyi has a smaller body and tibia length than P. corroboree (Osborne et al. 1996). Taxonomy: Until recently, only one species of Corroboree Frog was recognised (Cogger 1992).
    [Show full text]
  • B11 Corroboree Frog Aug 11.Pub
    biodiversity fact sheet MURRAY CATCHMENT MANAGEMENT AUTHORITY CORROBOREE FROGS Factsheet B11-Aug-2011 Northern Corroboree Frog © Dave Hunter Southern Corroboree Frog © Dave Hunter Northern and Southern Corroboree Frogs are two of Conservation Status Australia’s most iconic frog species, but they are also Both Corroboree Frog species have been in a rapid state two of Australia’s most endangered. of decline since the mid 1980s. The Southern Corroboree Frog has now declined in more than 98% of its former What are they? range, and is likely to become extinct in the wild without There are two closely related species of Corroboree Frog: human intervention. The Southern Corroboree Frog is the Southern Corroboree Frog ( Pseudophryne corroboree ), listed as critically endangered at both a state and and the Northern Corroboree Frog ( Pseudophryne national level. Latest surveys indicated that less than 50 pengilleyi ). Both species are between 2.5 and 3 centimetres Southern Corroboree Frogs are left in the wild. in length. The Northern Corroboree Frog has also undergone Where are they found? substantial declines across its range. The decline of this Corroboree Frogs are only found in a small area of south- species has been particularly severe in the Brindabella eastern New South Wales. The Southern Corroboree Frog Ranges, where it has become almost entirely extinct from only occurs in Kosciuszko National Park at altitudes the Australian Capital Territory. The species is listed as between 1300 and 1700 metres. The Northern Corroboree critically endangered at both the state and national level. Frog occurs in Northern Kosciuszko National Park, Namadgi National Park, Brindabella National Park and some adjacent Why are populations in decline? state forests above 750 metres altitude.
    [Show full text]
  • Northern Corroboree Frog
    JULY 2015 Northern Corroboree Frog The Northern Corroboree Frog (Pseudophryne Conservation threats pengilleyi) is a small but distinctive frog with bright yellow-green and black stripes on its upper surfaces and Corroboree Frogs were Photo by Murray Evans, Conservation Research a broadly marbled ventral surface of black and white or once abundant in suitable black and yellow. Adults attain 2.5-3 cm body length. habitat (bogs, fens and The Northern Corroboree Frog differs from the closely surrounding woodlands) but related Southern Corroboree Frog (P. corroboree) by populations of both species having more green in the yellow stripes which also tend have declined over the to be narrower. Northern Corroboree Frogs are also past 20 years and are now slightly smaller than Southern Corroboree Frogs, which on the verge of extinction occur in Kosciuszko National Park in NSW. in the wild. In the ACT it is estimated less than 50 The Northern Corroboree Frog is confined to the Northern Corroboree Frogs remain in the wild from the high country of the ACT and adjacent NSW, along the original populations. The decline of Corroboree Frogs Brindabella and Bimberi Ranges and throughout the is due to disease caused by the introduced Amphibian Fiery Range and Bogong Mountains, where they occur Chytrid Fungus, which has caused the decline and in in waterlogged grasslands, heath, sphagnum moss bogs some cases extinctions of frog species world-wide. Other and adjacent woodlands. The ACT population is located threats include climate change, drought, inappropriate almost entirely in the subalpine areas of Namadgi fire, disturbance from introduced animals (pigs and National Park, with an important stronghold being the horses) and weeds.
    [Show full text]
  • The Emerging Amphibian Fungal Disease, Chytridiomycosis: Akeyexampleoftheglobal Phenomenon of Wildlife Emerging Infectious Diseases JONATHAN E
    The Emerging Amphibian Fungal Disease, Chytridiomycosis: AKeyExampleoftheGlobal Phenomenon of Wildlife Emerging Infectious Diseases JONATHAN E. KOLBY1,2 and PETER DASZAK2 1One Health Research Group, College of Public Health, Medical, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia; 2EcoHealth Alliance, New York, NY 10001 ABSTRACT The spread of amphibian chytrid fungus, INTRODUCTION: GLOBAL Batrachochytrium dendrobatidis, is associated with the emerging AMPHIBIAN DECLINE infectious wildlife disease chytridiomycosis. This fungus poses During the latter half of the 20th century, it was noticed an overwhelming threat to global amphibian biodiversity and is contributing toward population declines and extinctions that global amphibian populations had entered a state worldwide. Extremely low host-species specificity potentially of unusually rapid decline. Hundreds of species have threatens thousands of the 7,000+ amphibian species with since become categorized as “missing” or “lost,” a grow- infection, and hosts in additional classes of organisms have now ing number of which are now believed extinct (1). also been identified, including crayfish and nematode worms. Amphibians are often regarded as environmental in- Soon after the discovery of B. dendrobatidis in 1999, dicator species because of their highly permeable skin it became apparent that this pathogen was already pandemic; and biphasic life cycles, during which most species in- dozens of countries and hundreds of amphibian species had already been exposed. The timeline of B. dendrobatidis’s global habit aquatic zones as larvae and as adults become emergence still remains a mystery, as does its point of origin. semi or wholly terrestrial. This means their overall The reason why B. dendrobatidis seems to have only recently health is closely tied to that of the landscape.
    [Show full text]
  • Adaptive Reintroduction Strategies for the Critically Endangered Northern Corroboree Frog Final Report
    Adaptive reintroduction strategies for the Critically Endangered northern corroboree frog Final report Ben Scheele, David Lindenmayer June 2021 Figure 1. This research was conducted in sub-alpine and montane ecosystems in the ACT and southern NSW, including in Namadgi and Kosciuszko National Parks, from early 2018 to mid-2021. Cite this publication as: Scheele, B., Lindenmayer, D., 2021. Adaptive reintroduction strategies for the Critically Endangered northern corroboree frog. NESP Threatened Sprecies Recovery Hub Project 3.3.6 report, Brisbane. Cover image: Northern corroboree frog. Image: Adam Parsons 2 Contents Executive summary .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 1. Conservation translocations for amphibian species threatened by chytrid fungus ......................................................... 5 2. Identifying and evaluating translocation sites for the northern corroboree frog .............................................................. 5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................................... 6 Context ................................................................................................................................................................................................................7 Methodology
    [Show full text]