Front Rangenews
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
City Budget 2011-2012
City of Golden BIENNIAL BUDGET 2011/2012 2011 - 2012 CITY OF GOLDEN, COLORADO BUDGET AND CAPITAL PROGRAMS 2011 - 2012 Golden Downtown General Improvement District Budget 2011 Budget Adopted by Resolution of the Golden City Council on December 9, 2010 2010 GOLDEN CITY COUNCIL Jacob Smith, Mayor Marcia Claxton, Ward I Joe Behm, Ward II Bob Vermeulen, Ward III Bill Fisher, Ward IV Marjorie Sloan, District I Karen Oxman, Mayor Pro-Tem, District II Submitted by: Michael C. Bestor City Manager 2011-2012 CITY OF GOLDEN BIENNIAL BUDGET TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION Budget Message ..................................................................................................................... 1 City Council Budget Letter .................................................................................................... 7 Budget Calendar ..................................................................................................................... 10 Citizens Budget Advisory Committee Message .................................................................... 12 GFOA Distinguished Budget Presentation Award ................................................................ 14 2011-2012 Budget Summary Fund Type Descriptions ......................................................... 15 2011 Budget Summary Revenue and Expenditure Chart of all Funds .................................. 20 2012 Budget Summary Revenue and Expenditure Chart of all Funds .................................. 21 2011 Budget Summary – By Fund Type ............................................................................ -
Math Worksheets
MATH WORKSHEETS High School: Read and answer questions 1. The Rockies’ revenue comes from ticket sales, concessions, parking, TV and radio contracts, as well as other sources. The Rockies’ greatest expense is player salaries. In 2019, the Rockies are expected to have an estimated payroll of $145.9 million. In 2018, the Rockies sold 3,015,880 tickets at an average price of about $26 per ticket, for a total ticket revenue of $78,412,880. This means ticket revenue in 2018 was enough to pay for about 53.7% of 2019 player salaries. In 2020, the Rockies estimated payroll is expected to rise to $177.3 million. To help pay for this, the team would like to see if they can generate more revenue through ticket sales. After studying the effects of raising ticket prices, the Rockies estimate that for every $1 decrease in average ticket price, they would sell 100,000 additional tickets in a year. Likewise, for every $1 increase in average ticket price, they would sell 100,000 fewer tickets in a year. The team calculates ticket revenue with the following model: ticket revenue = (number of tickets sold)(price per ticket) Let x = the change in average ticket price, in dollars. Refine the Rockies’ model by defining the number of tickets sold as 3,015,880 tickets minus the estimated decrease in ticket sales per dollar of average ticket price increase, and define the price per ticket as $26 plus the increase in average ticket price. With your refined model, what change in average ticket price results in the maximum increase in ticket revenue? Is the increased ticket revenue enough to keep paying for 53.7% of player salaries in 2020? What other factors influence ticket sales and how might you include them to further refine the ticket revenue model? 2021 MATH DAY MATH WORKSHEETS 2. -
Probable Starting Pitchers 31-31, Home 15-16, Road 16-15
NOTES Great American Ball Park • 100 Joe Nuxhall Way • Cincinnati, OH 45202 • @Reds • @RedsPR • @RedlegsJapan • reds.com 31-31, HOME 15-16, ROAD 16-15 PROBABLE STARTING PITCHERS Sunday, June 13, 2021 Sun vs Col: RHP Tony Santillan (ML debut) vs RHP Antonio Senzatela (2-6, 4.62) 700 wlw, bsoh, 1:10et Mon at Mil: RHP Vladimir Gutierrez (2-1, 2.65) vs LHP Eric Lauer (1-2, 4.82) 700 wlw, bsoh, 8:10et Great American Ball Park Tue at Mil: RHP Luis Castillo (2-9, 6.47) vs LHP Brett Anderson (2-4, 4.99) 700 wlw, bsoh, 8:10et Wed at Mil: RHP Tyler Mahle (6-2, 3.56) vs RHP Freddy Peralta (6-1, 2.25) 700 wlw, bsoh, 2:10et • • • • • • • • • • Thu at SD: LHP Wade Miley (6-4, 2.92) vs TBD 700 wlw, bsoh, 10:10et CINCINNATI REDS (31-31) vs Fri at SD: RHP Tony Santillan vs TBD 700 wlw, bsoh, 10:10et Sat at SD: RHP Vladimir Gutierrez vs TBD 700 wlw, FOX, 7:15et COLORADO ROCKIES (25-40) Sun at SD: RHP Luis Castillo vs TBD 700 wlw, bsoh, mlbn, 4:10et TODAY'S GAME: Is Game 3 (2-0) of a 3-game series vs Shelby Cravens' ALL-TIME HITS, REDS CAREER REGULAR SEASON RECORD VS ROCKIES Rockies and Game 6 (3-2) of a 6-game homestand that included a 2-1 1. Pete Rose ..................................... 3,358 All-Time Since 1993: ....................................... 105-108 series loss to the Brewers...tomorrow night at American Family Field, 2. Barry Larkin ................................... 2,340 At Riverfront/Cinergy Field: ................................. -
Margie Williams, DDS Molly Johnson, DDS 2979 N. Iola St. Denver
Left: Bruce “B” Hellerstein, creator and curator of the National Ballpark Mu- seum in LoDo, began collecting baseball memorabilia as a youngster growing up in Denver. His collection includes thousands of items from major- and minor-league teams. Below: A game-worn jersey from Dodgers pitcher Don Drysdale shares space with a complete usher’s outfit from Fenway Park in Boston. Left: Stadiums, current and former, are the focus of the AA PitchPitch National Ballpark Museum near Coors Field. Hundreds of photographs, bricks from long-gone parks, turnstiles, signed baseballs, and other memorabilia fill several rooms. Chicago won the National League pennant in ForFor 1932, lost to the New York Yankees in the World Se- ries, the one in which Babe Ruth is said to have called his home run in Game 3. BallparkBallpark Above: One corner of the museum is devoted to the mi- nor-league Denver Bears, predecessor to the Colorado Rockies. Among the Bears’ items is the infamous 1952 HistoryHistory “strike-zone” uniform, worn only one year by the team. Below: An ushers cap from Ebbets Field and a baseball The author goes back in time in the museum’s area devoted to Wrigley is one of the museum’s treasured acquisitions. A miniature reproduction of Wrigley’s famed hand-op- autographed by Babe Ruth and Lou Gehrig. Field and the Chicago Cubs. The Cubs pinball game in the foreground erated scoreboard dominates the room, which includes the home team’s on-deck batting circle. By Dick Kreck tion on memorizing the starting lineups of ti, Wrigley Field and Comiskey Park in burgh) or whatever it might be. -
A TIMELINE for GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003)
A TIMELINE FOR GOLDEN, COLORADO (Revised October 2003) "When a society or a civilization perishes, one condition can always be found. They forgot where they came from." Carl Sandburg This time-line was originally created by the Golden Historic Preservation Board for the 1995 Golden community meetings concerning growth. It is intended to illustrate some of the events and thoughts that helped shape Golden. Major historical events and common day-to-day happenings that influenced the lives of the people of Golden are included. Corrections, additions, and suggestions are welcome and may be relayed to either the Historic Preservation Board or the Planning Department at 384-8097. The information concerning events in Golden was gathered from a variety of sources. Among those used were: • The Colorado Transcript • The Golden Transcript • The Rocky Mountain News • The Denver Post State of Colorado Web pages, in particular the Colorado State Archives The League of Women Voters annual reports Golden, The 19th Century: A Colorado Chronicle. Lorraine Wagenbach and Jo Ann Thistlewood. Harbinger House, Littleton, 1987 The Shining Mountains. Georgina Brown. B & B Printers, Gunnison. 1976 The 1989 Survey of Historic Buildings in Downtown Golden. R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Survey of Golden Historic Buildings. by R. Laurie Simmons and Christine Whitacre, Front Range Research Associates, Inc. Report on file at the City of Golden Planning and Development Department. Golden Survey of Historic Buildings, 1991. R. Laurie Simmons and Thomas H. Simmons. Front Range Research Associates, Inc. -
Baseball's Manifest Destiny: the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly
UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations 1-1-1999 Baseball's manifest destiny: The good, the bad, and the ugly Patrick Valenti Miller University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/rtds Repository Citation Miller, Patrick Valenti, "Baseball's manifest destiny: The good, the bad, and the ugly" (1999). UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations. 1064. http://dx.doi.org/10.25669/zxpy-ax1w This Thesis is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Thesis in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/ or on the work itself. This Thesis has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Retrospective Theses & Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. -
Major League Baseball
Appendix 1 to Sports Facility Reports, Volume 4, Number 1 ( Copyright 2003, National Sports Law Institute of Marquette University Law School) MAJOR LEAGUE BASEBALL Note: Information complied from Sports Business News, Forbes.com, Lexis-Nexis, and other sources published on or before June 6, 2003. Team Principal Owner Most Recent Purchase Price Current Value ($/Mil) ($/Mil) Percent Increase/Decrease From Last Year Anaheim Angels Walt Disney Co. 183.5 (2003) $225 (+15%) Stadium ETA Cost % Facility Financing (millions) Publicly Financed Edison 1966 $24 100% In April 1998, Disney completed a $117 M renovation. International Field Disney contributed $87 M toward the project while the of Anaheim City of Anaheim contributed $30 M through the retention of $10 M in external stadium advertising and $20 M in hotel taxes and reserve funds. UPDATE In May 2003, the Anaheim Angels made history by becoming the first American based professional sports team to be owned by an individual of Latino decent. Auturo Moreno, an Arizona businessman worth an estimated $940 million, bought the Angels for $183.5 million. Moreno, one of eleven children, is the former owner of a minor league baseball team and was once a minority owner of the Arizona Diamondbacks. NAMING RIGHTS The Anaheim Angels currently play at Edison International Field of Anaheim. On September 15, 1997, Edison International entered into a naming-rights agreement that will pay the Angels $50 million over 20 years with an average annual payout of $2.5 million. The naming-rights agreement expires in 2018. Team Principal Owner Most Recent Purchase Price Current Value ($/Mil) ($/Mil) Percent Increase/Decrease From Last Year Arizona Jerry Colangelo $130 (1995) $269 (-1%) Diamondbacks Stadium ETA Cost % Facility Financing (millions) Publicly Financed Bank One Ballpark 1998 $355 71% The Maricopa County Stadium District provided $238 M for the construction through a .25% increase in the county sales tax from April 1995 to November 30, 1997. -
Case Study: Professional Baseball Stadium Heavy-Traffic Flooring
Case Study: Professional Baseball Stadium Heavy-Traffic Flooring Coors Field Location: Denver, CO Project Overview: Every year nearly three million fans venture to Coors Field to attend a Colorado Rockies baseball game. Built in 1995, Coors Field is an all brick stadium constructed in the heart of Denver to resemble classic ballparks such as Wrigley Field and Fenway Park. In 2011 the Rockies organization elected to complete a series of improvements to the already highly regarded ballpark. This development effort included the addition of the Camarena Loft, a high-end restaurant located in the right field deck concourse. Complete with high-end natural stone accents and stunning views of downtown Denver flanked by the Rocky Mountains, Camarena Loft offered a unique setting to watch a baseball game. In order to compliment the artistic design of the open air restaurant, the Rockies sought after a decorative flooring system that would not only be aesthetically appealing but also durable enough to withstand heavy traffic within an exterior environment. The installation contractor, Denver Decorative Concrete selected HP Spartacote’s Sparta-Stain™ high performance polyaspartic flooring system after consulting with the Colorado Rockies and the General Contractor, Mortenson Construction of Denver. Installation Specifics: Initially, the existing concrete floor was ground to properly open the concrete for optimal coating adhesion. With the floor prepped, the contractor installed a sand-beige Sparta-Flex® polyaspartic prime coat. A second coat of Sparta-Flex® Clear was then rolled out and two colors of Abstract Dye™ were sprayed directly into the wet coating. The final stage of the application included a high gloss top-coat with HP Spartacoteʼs Sparta-Flex™ clear polyaspartic, complete with Sparta-Grip™ traction additive for a durable finish. -
Application Guide
Application Guide Semiconductor Ceramics Ultra-Pure Ceramics for Semiconductor Processing CoorsTek offers a broad spectrum of materials for key semiconductor applications. To ensure optimal product performance, CoorsTek engineers offer assistance through every phase of the design and manufacturing processes, including component design assistance, material selection, and production expertise. Al₂O₃ ALUMINA SiO₂ QUARTZ AD-995 Alumina T230 ADS II Alumina T240 Fine-grained Alumina PlasmaPure-UC™ Alumina RF Pure Alumina Si SILICON B₄C BORON CARBIDE SiC SILICON CARBIDE PureSiC® CVD SiC UltraSiC™ Sintered SiC Al ESD-SAFE CERAMICS CeraSiC-B Sintered SiC SC-SD Sintered SiC Statsafe™ ESD ADC-92 Ultraclean ™ Si:SiC TPSS Si:SiC CVD SiC Coating C GRAPHITE SiC Coated Graphite Y₂O₃ YTTRIA • Fine Grain • Clear Carbon Yttria Bulk Yttria Plasma Coating N NITRIDES ZrO₂ ZIRCONIA Aluminum Nitride (AlN) Silicon Nitride (Si₃N₄) Dura-Z™ Zirconia © 2017 COORSTEK, INC. Semiconductor Manufacturing Components With excellent material properties, CoorsTek ultra-pure ceramics are ideal for use throughout the entire semiconductor manufacturing cycle Etch Single Silicon Pulling • Domes • Crucibles • Focus Rings • Nozzles • Plates • Shields • Shower Heads Deposition Thermal Batch • Chamber Liners Diffusion & LPCVD • Cover Rings • Back Fill Injectors • Gas Distribution Plates • Baffles & Holders • CVD, EVD, ECP • Cantilever Paddles • Domes • Liners & Process Tubes • Heaters • Pedestals • Plating Insulators • Wafer Boats Wafer Inspection High Temperature & Lithography RTP & EPI • Ceramic Filters • Diffusers • Photomask Substrates • Insulators • Stage Components • Rf Shields • Vacuum Break Filters • Rings • Wafer Tables • Susceptors Implant General Applications • Air-Bearings • End Effectors • Air Bearing Guideways • Heaters • Interferometer • Insulators Reference Mirrors • Lift Pins • Scale Mounts • Multi-Layer Channeled Ceramic Substrates Planarization — CMP Back End / Packaging • Cmp Tables • Capillaries • Polishing Plates • Die Collets • Vacuum Pick-Up Tools • Wedges © 2017 COORSTEK, INC. -
Minor League Baseball Report
PRELIMINARY DRAFT – SUBJECT TO REVISION CONFIDENTIAL CITY OF SAN ANTONIO MINOR LEAGUE BASEBALL DUE DILIGENCE REPORT PREPARED BY: BARRETT SPORTS GROUP, LLC SEPTEMBER 16, 2016 The following report has been prepared for the internal use of the City of San Antonio and is subject to the attached limiting conditions and assumptions The scope of services has been limited – additional due diligence required Findings are preliminary in nature and subject to revision This report may not be used, in whole or in part, in any financing document Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 2 Confidential TABLE OF CONTENTS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY II. SAN ANTONIO MISSIONS OVERVIEW III. TRIPLE-A BASEBALL OVERVIEW IV. MARKET OVERVIEW V. PRELIMINARY PROGRAM RECOMMENDATION VI. FINANCIAL ANALYSIS VII. FINANCING ALTERNATIVES APPENDIX A: MARKET DEMOGRAPHICS APPENDIX B: BRAILSFORD & DUNLAVEY REPORT REVIEW APPENDIX C: MLB POTENTIAL LIMITING CONDITIONS AND ASSUMPTIONS Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 3 Confidential I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Introduction Barrett Sports Group, LLC (BSG) is pleased to present our preliminary findings to the City of San Antonio (City) The City retained BSG to evaluate potential feasibility of the proposed development of a new state-of- the-art Triple-A minor league baseball stadium in San Antonio, Texas Seven potential Triple-A stadium sites have been identified by the City and Populous . ITC . Fox Tech South . Fox Tech . UTSA . Alamodome . Irish Flats . Fox Tech North The City is currently home to the Double-A San Antonio Missions The findings are limited since BSG has not completed market surveys and/or focus group sessions – consideration could be given to completing these tasks Preliminary Draft – Subject to Revision Page 5 Confidential I. -
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 SCHEDULE 14A Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Amendment No. ) Filed by the Registrant Filed by a Party other than the Registrant Check the appropriate box: Preliminary Proxy Statement Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2)) Definitive Proxy Statement Definitive Additional Materials Soliciting Material under §240.14a-12 MOLSON COORS BEVERAGE COMPANY (Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter) (Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant) Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box): No fee required. Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies: (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies: (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined): (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction: (5) Total fee paid: Fee paid previously with preliminary materials. Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount Previously Paid: (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.: (3) Filing Party: (4) Date Filed: P.O. -
Adolph COORS Company and Its Unincorporated Affiliate, Coors
,•, UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY .SEFORE THE ADMINISTRATOR. In the Matter of ) ) Adolph ·~~ors company ) Docket No. RCRA-VIII-90-09 '• and i't.s unincorporated ) aftil~ate, ) coors Brewing company, ) ··........ ) R~spondent ) ·~. ORDER DENYING MOTIONS FOR AN ACCELERATED DECISION AND TO DISMISS The complaint in this proceeding under section 3008 of the Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended (42 u.s. C. § 6928), commonly referred to as RCRA, issued on June 19, 1990, charged ·Respondent Coors with violations of the Act and applicable regulations. Specifically, Count I charged Coors with disposal of hazardous waste without a permit during the period october 1981 to .. August 1984, to-wit: spent solvents 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA) ..... ··; . .. : and Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) . designated as FOOl and F002, --·-· ... respectively, in the list of hazardous wastes appearing in 40 CFR ,· .. -~;i:-:.::."§ 261.31. The disposal allegedly occurred through leaks from sewer ,' ·~. ' _·-;:~ ;iines beneat~ Coors• container plant. count II charged Coors with .t· '- .f '·· · · <' :· · failure ·t.o . truthfully disclose information re~ired by 40 CFR § § 270.10(d) and 270.30(1~) and Count III charged Coors with failing to truthfully disclose information required by an EPA ncall-in" letter. Count IV charged Coors with failing to certify its 2 response to an EPA section 3007(a) information request as required by 40 CFR § 270.ll(d). In its answer and request for a hearing, dated July 24, 1990, Coors, among other things, denied that it allowed solvents identified in the complaint to leak from sewer lines at its container plant and alleged that upon discovery of an unanticipated sewer line failure it took steps to prevent leakage from the sewer line and to mitigate the effects of such leakage.