A Sexual Hybrid and Autopolyploids Detected in Seed from Crosses Between Neslia Paniculata and Camelina Sativa (Brassicaceae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Sexual Hybrid and Autopolyploids Detected in Seed from Crosses Between Neslia Paniculata and Camelina Sativa (Brassicaceae) Botany A sexual hybrid and autopolyploids detected in seed from crosses between Neslia paniculata and Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) Journal: Botany Manuscript ID cjb-2019-0202.R2 Manuscript Type: Note Date Submitted by the 03-Mar-2020 Author: Complete List of Authors: Martin, Sara; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre LaFlamme, Michelle; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and DevelopmentDraft Centre James, Tracey; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre Sauder, Connie; Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre Brassicaceae, hybridization, autopolyploidization, neopolyploidy, gene Keyword: flow Is the invited manuscript for consideration in a Special Not applicable (regular submission) Issue? : https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Page 1 of 19 Botany 1 2 3 A sexual hybrid and autopolyploids detected in seed from crosses between Neslia paniculata and 4 Camelina sativa (Brassicaceae) 5 Sara L. Martin1, Michelle LaFlamme1, Tracey James1, Connie A. Sauder1 6 7 1 Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa Research and Development Centre, 960 Carling Ave., 8 Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6 9 Corresponding Author: 10 Sara L. Martin 11 960 Carling Ave. Ottawa, Ontario, K1A 0C6 12 613-715-5406 13 [email protected] 14 15 Emails of co-authors: 16 [email protected] Draft 17 [email protected] 18 [email protected] 1 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Botany Page 2 of 19 19 Abstract 20 It is important to understand the probability of hybridization and potential for introgression of 21 transgenic crop alleles into wild populations as part of pre-release risk assessment. Here we completed 22 bidirectional crosses between the emerging crop, camelina (Camelina sativa) and its weedy relative ball 23 mustard (Neslia paniculata). Ball mustard is a self-compatible annual that produces hard ball-like seeds 24 similar to canola or mustard seed in size and shape. A total of 1,593 crosses were completed and 25 collected with camelina as the maternal parent, while 3,253 crosses were successfully collected in the 26 reverse direction. Putatively hybrid seedlings were screened with flow cytometry and species-specific 27 nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) markers. Three plants had DNA contents close to 28 expectations for hybrids, but only one of these, formed on camelina, had the expected ITS markers. This 29 hybrid exhibited low fertility and neither selfDraft pollination nor backcrossing produced viable progeny. The 30 other two plants, formed on ball mustard, had high pollen and seed fertility and were identified as ball 31 mustard neoautotetraploids. Therefore, the hybridization rate between camelina and ball mustard is 32 relatively low at 1 in 20,000 ovules pollinated when camelina is the maternal parent. However, 33 autotetraploids may form frequently in ball mustard and tetraploid populations may exist in nature. 34 Key words: Brassicaceae, hybridization, autopolyploidization, neopolyploids, weeds, gene flow 2 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Page 3 of 19 Botany 35 Introduction 36 Within Canada, numerous plant species could receive gene flow from crops with novel traits. As 37 part of a pre-release risk assessment, it is important to understand the probability of this hybridization 38 and the potential for introgression of crop alleles into wild populations (Anderson 1949; Ellstrand and 39 Hoffman 1990; Dale et al. 1993; Warwick et al. 1999; Snow 2002; Ellstrand 2003; Messeguer 2003; 40 Devos et al. 2009). The short term fitness effects of hybridization and gene flow from crops to the wild 41 population and the long term evolutionary consequences of this introgression will depend on the 42 characteristics of the novel trait (Mallet et al. 2016). However, fundamentally, whether or not a trait can 43 be incorporated into another species’ genome, depends on the strength of reproductive isolation 44 between the lineages. This strength has proven to be highly variable across taxa with hybridity making a 45 substantial contribution to the evolutionaryDraft histories of many plant species (Mallet 2007; Abbott et al. 46 2013). 47 Camelina (Camelina sativa (L.) Crantz; n = 20 (6+7+7) is a hexaploid crop with strong potential to 48 produce high value products such as biofuel and a sustainable source of for omega-3 fatty acids for 49 human consumption (Small 2013; Berti et al. 2016). Several close relatives of camelina, including other 50 species of Camelina, Shepherd’s purse (Capsella bursa-pastoris (L.) Medik.), three species of Arabidopsis 51 (A. arenicola (Richardson ex Hooker) Al-Shehbaz, Elvin, D. F. Murray & Warwick, A. lyrata (L.) O’kane 52 &Al-Shebaz, and A. thaliana (L.) Heynhold), and ball mustard (Neslia paniculata (L.) Desv.) (Al-Shehbaz 53 and co-workers 2010; Al-Shehbaz 2012), have become naturalized in Canada and are weeds of marginal 54 and agricultural lands. Ball mustard is a self-compatible, annual or winter annual plant that, like 55 camelina, is native to central Eurasia and was first introduced into in Manitoba, Canada in the 1800s 56 (Francis and Warwick 2003). The species is generally considered diploid (n = 7) (Mulligan 1957; Al- 57 Shehbaz and co-workers 2010). 3 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Botany Page 4 of 19 58 Historically, within Canada, ball mustard has been most abundant on the Canadian Prairie 59 Provinces, with occurrences recorded across the country (Francis and Warwick 2003). Ball mustard has 60 small hard ball-like seeds with strong dormancy that are able to persist in the seed bank and, because of 61 similarity in shape and size of their seeds, can be a problematic contaminant of canola (Brassica napus 62 L.) or mustard (Sinapis alba L.). Abundance of ball mustard appears to have declined from being 63 common in the 1880s (Francis and Warwick 2003) to low abundance in the Canadian Prairie Provinces in 64 the 1990s (Leeson et al. 2005). This may be a result of good control of the species with herbicides. 65 However, an Alberta population resistant to acetolactate synthase inhibitors was found in 1998 (Heap 66 2019). The genome has been sequenced (Slotte et al. 2013) and the species has received attention as a 67 system for understanding karyotype evolution in the Brassicaceae (Lysak et al. 2006; Mandáková and 68 Lysak 2008). Ball mustard is indeterminate Draftand flowers from May to September, which would overlap 69 with the flowering period of camelina. Hybridization has been reported between the two subspecies of 70 ball mustard, Neslia paniculata subsp. paniculata and the apparently hexaploid (n = 21) Neslia 71 paniculata subsp. thracica (Velen.) Bornm. (Francis and Warwick 2003; Rice et al. 2015), but we are 72 unaware of any work examining the species’ potential to make wide hybridizations. Here we performed 73 bidirectional crosses between camelina and ball mustard to establish their baseline inter-fertility. 74 Materials and Methods 75 Seed Sources 76 Five accession of camelina including both cultivated material and material collected from feral 77 populations in Canada and four accessions of ball mustard (Neslia paniculata subsp. paniculata) received 78 from botanical gardens and from material collected in Canada were used (Table 1). Seeds of ball 79 mustard had the seed coats removed prior to planting, while camelina seeds were planted directly into 80 soil, into 10 cm pots filled with a 1:2:1 mixture of soil, peat and sand. These were placed in the green 4 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Page 5 of 19 Botany 81 house with a 16 h photoperiod with supplemental lights programed to come on when light levels are 82 below 400 W/m2 and temperatures of 18 °C at night and 20 °C during the day. 83 Controlled Crosses 84 Three treatments were applied to each plant. Buds were emasculated and after a day were 1) 85 left un-pollinated as negative controls, 2) pollinated with self-pollen for a positive control or 3) 86 pollinated with the pollen of the other species as the crossing treatment. Further, un-manipulated 87 flowers from each plant were selected as a second positive control. As camelina has approximately 8-20 88 ovules per flower, we expected that 1000 pollinations with camelina as the maternal parent would 89 result in approximately 12,000 ovules challenged by ball mustard pollen and the power to detect 90 hybridization at a rate of 0.025% with 95% Draftconfidence (Jhala et al. 2011). In contrast, while the 91 gynoecium of ball mustard initially contains 4-6 ovules, only one, occasionally two, and more rarely, 92 three, develop into seeds. This limits the expected number of ovules/per pollination to one. As a result, 93 a thousand pollinations only results in a thousand trials for hybridity and 2,995 pollinations are required 94 for detecting a hybridization rate of 0.1% with 95% confidence (Jhala et al. 2011). Any seed that formed 95 on flowers that received foreign pollen were treated like the seeds of their maternal parent and grown 96 under the same conditions. 97 Hybrid Screening 98 Flow cytometry was used to screen putative hybrids between ball mustard and camelina based 99 on their DNA content following protocols described previously (Martin et al. 2015, 2017). Briefly, 100 samples were fresh leaf material from rosettes that were collected in the greenhouse and placed on ice, 101 chopped with a new, sharp razor blade in Galbraith buffer (0.75 mL), and then kept in the dark while 102 they stained for 30– 40 min with propidium iodide. Samples were run with radish (Raphanus sativus L. 103 ‘Saxa’ (1.11pg/2C)) as an external standard for initial screening, however camelina was used as an 5 https://mc06.manuscriptcentral.com/botany-pubs Botany Page 6 of 19 104 internal standard for precise DNA estimates with three technical replicates completed over three 105 different days (Doležel et al.
Recommended publications
  • The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts
    The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: The Vascular Plants of Massachusetts: A County Checklist • First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Somers Bruce Sorrie and Paul Connolly, Bryan Cullina, Melissa Dow Revision • First A County Checklist Plants of Massachusetts: Vascular The A County Checklist First Revision Melissa Dow Cullina, Bryan Connolly, Bruce Sorrie and Paul Somers Massachusetts Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program The Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program (NHESP), part of the Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, is one of the programs forming the Natural Heritage network. NHESP is responsible for the conservation and protection of hundreds of species that are not hunted, fished, trapped, or commercially harvested in the state. The Program's highest priority is protecting the 176 species of vertebrate and invertebrate animals and 259 species of native plants that are officially listed as Endangered, Threatened or of Special Concern in Massachusetts. Endangered species conservation in Massachusetts depends on you! A major source of funding for the protection of rare and endangered species comes from voluntary donations on state income tax forms. Contributions go to the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Fund, which provides a portion of the operating budget for the Natural Heritage & Endangered Species Program. NHESP protects rare species through biological inventory,
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution of Flowering Time in the Tetraploid Capsella Bursa-Pastoris (Brassicaceae)
    Digital Comprehensive Summaries of Uppsala Dissertations from the Faculty of Science and Technology 367 Evolution of Flowering Time in the Tetraploid Capsella bursa-pastoris (Brassicaceae) TANJA SLOTTE ACTA UNIVERSITATIS UPSALIENSIS ISSN 1651-6214 UPPSALA ISBN 978-91-554-7024-1 2007 urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-8311 ! " #$$" $%$$ & & & ' ( ) * ( + )( #$$"( & ! * ) ) ,-( . ( /0"( 1$ ( ( 2+ 3" 4345514"$#14( . 6 & &* & * ( 2 2 & & * * & * & ( ! * & ( . 7 & * . * & & & & & * ( & & * & * 8 & ( ) & & * * ( . 4 4& * && * * && & * ( + * 9) ,9 ) - & & * : ( ) !"!#$% ,%- & 9) &!'$()* &! ,&- * & * ( && & * & * & ; ( ) % & * & && & * ( 2 8 & & * +, - & * 8 9) . / $ / * / $ * / ) %0/ / $ 12345 / , < ) 6 + #$$" 2++ 0540#1 2+ 3" 4345514"$#14 % %%% 4 / , %== (:(= > ? % %%% 4 /- looking carefully, a shepherd’s purse is blooming under the fence Bash List of papers This thesis is based on the following papers, which are referred to by their Roman numerals: I Slotte, T., Ceplitis, A., Neuffer, B., Hurka, H., and M. Lascoux. 2006. Intrageneric phylogeny of Capsella (Brassicaceae) and the
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogenetic Position and Generic Limits of Arabidopsis (Brassicaceae)
    PHYLOGENETIC POSITION Steve L. O'Kane, Jr.2 and Ihsan A. 3 AND GENERIC LIMITS OF Al-Shehbaz ARABIDOPSIS (BRASSICACEAE) BASED ON SEQUENCES OF NUCLEAR RIBOSOMAL DNA1 ABSTRACT The primary goals of this study were to assess the generic limits and monophyly of Arabidopsis and to investigate its relationships to related taxa in the family Brassicaceae. Sequences of the internal transcribed spacer region (ITS-1 and ITS-2) of nuclear ribosomal DNA, including 5.8S rDNA, were used in maximum parsimony analyses to construct phylogenetic trees. An attempt was made to include all species currently or recently included in Arabidopsis, as well as species suggested to be close relatives. Our ®ndings show that Arabidopsis, as traditionally recognized, is polyphyletic. The genus, as recircumscribed based on our results, (1) now includes species previously placed in Cardaminopsis and Hylandra as well as three species of Arabis and (2) excludes species now placed in Crucihimalaya, Beringia, Olimar- abidopsis, Pseudoarabidopsis, and Ianhedgea. Key words: Arabidopsis, Arabis, Beringia, Brassicaceae, Crucihimalaya, ITS phylogeny, Olimarabidopsis, Pseudoar- abidopsis. Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. was ®rst rec- netic studies and has played a major role in un- ommended as a model plant for experimental ge- derstanding the various biological processes in netics over a half century ago (Laibach, 1943). In higher plants (see references in Somerville & Mey- recent years, many biologists worldwide have fo- erowitz, 2002). The intraspeci®c phylogeny of A. cused their research on this plant. As indicated by thaliana has been examined by Vander Zwan et al. Patrusky (1991), the widespread acceptance of A. (2000). Despite the acceptance of A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Brassicaceae of Ohio
    THE BRASSICACEJE OF OHIO. EMMA E. LAUGHLIN. Brassicaceae. Mustard Family. Herbs, with watery sap of a pungent taste, not poisonous; with alternate, exstipulate leaves, usually large at the base of the stem and intergrading in form to the top of the stem. Flowers hypogynous, bisporangiate, usually isobilateral, appear- ing actinomorphic, regular, usually with glands, in racemes, short at first and elongating, or in corymbs; calyx of 4 sepals, decidu- ous, rarely persistent; corolla choripetalous, tetramerous, cruci- form; stamens 6, tetradynamous, rarely 4 or 2; ovulary com- pound, bilocular, the parietal placentae connected by a thin septum from which the valves separate when ripe; ovules 2 to several, campylotropous; fruit a silique if longer than broad, or a silicle if short, generally with 2 cavities, sometimes uni- locular, dehiscent or in a few genera indehiscent; endosperm scanty; cotyledons accumbent, incumbent or conduplicate. SYNOPSIS. I. Pod usually not more than twice as long as wide (a silicle); cotyledons accum- bent or incumbent. A. Pods more or less flattened parallel to the broad partition, dehiscent; cotyledons accumbent; leaves not lobed. 1. Pubescence stellate or of forked hairs. Berteroa, Koniga, Alyssum, Draba. 2. Pubescence of simple hairs or wanting; pods very broad and flat; leaves opposite. LUNARIE^E. Lunaria. B. Pods flattened at right angles to the partition or not flattened. 1. Pubescence of forked hairs; cotyledons incumbent. CAMELINE^E. Camelina, Bursa, Neslia. 2. Pubescence of simple hairs or wanting. a. Pod scarcely or not at all flattened; cotyledous accumbent. COCHLEARIE^E. Armoracia, Neobeckia, Sisymbrium, Radicula. b. Pods strongly flattened at right angles to the narrow partition.
    [Show full text]
  • Alien Plant Species in the Agricultural Habitats of Ukraine: Diversity and Risk Assessment
    Ekológia (Bratislava) Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 24–31, 2018 DOI:10.2478/eko-2018-0003 ALIEN PLANT SPECIES IN THE AGRICULTURAL HABITATS OF UKRAINE: DIVERSITY AND RISK ASSESSMENT RAISA BURDA Institute for Evolutionary Ecology, NAS of Ukraine, 37, Lebedeva Str., 03143 Kyiv, Ukraine; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract Burda R.: Alien plant species in the agricultural habitats of Ukraine: diversity and risk assessment. Ekológia (Bratislava), Vol. 37, No. 1, p. 24–31, 2018. This paper is the first critical review of the diversity of the Ukrainian adventive flora, which has spread in agricultural habitats in the 21st century. The author’s annotated checklist con- tains the data on 740 species, subspecies and hybrids from 362 genera and 79 families of non-native weeds. The floristic comparative method was used, and the information was gen- eralised into some categories of five characteristic features: climamorphotype (life form), time and method of introduction, level of naturalisation, and distribution into 22 classes of three habitat types according to European Nature Information System (EUNIS). Two assess- ments of the ecological risk of alien plants were first conducted in Ukraine according to the European methods: the risk of overcoming natural migration barriers and the risk of their impact on the environment. The exposed impact of invasive alien plants on ecosystems has a convertible character; the obtained information confirms a high level of phytobiotic contami- nation of agricultural habitats in Ukraine. It is necessary to implement European and national documents regarding the legislative and regulative policy on invasive alien species as one of the threats to biotic diversity.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dead Gene Walking: Convergent Degeneration of a Clade of MADS-Box Genes in 2 Brassicaceae 3 4 Andrea Hoffmeier A, 1, Lydia Gramzow A, 1, Amey S
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/149484; this version posted June 19, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 1 A dead gene walking: convergent degeneration of a clade of MADS-box genes in 2 Brassicaceae 3 4 Andrea Hoffmeier a, 1, Lydia Gramzow a, 1, Amey S. Bhide b, Nina Kottenhagen a, Andreas 5 Greifenstein a, Olesia Schubert b, Klaus Mummenhoff c, Annette Becker b, and Günter Theißen a, 2 6 7 a Department of Genetics, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Philosophenweg 12, D-07743 Jena, 8 Germany 9 b Plant Developmental Biology Group, Institute of Botany, Justus-Liebig-University Giessen, D- 10 35392 Giessen, Germany 11 c Department of Biology/Botany, University of Osnabrück, D-49076 Osnabrück, Germany 12 1 These authors contributed equally to this work 13 2 Address correspondence to [email protected] 14 15 Short title: Convergent degeneration of MADS-box genes 16 17 The author responsible for distribution of materials integral to the findings presented in this article 18 in accordance with the policy described in the Instructions for Authors (www.plantcell.org) is 19 Günter Theißen ([email protected]). bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/149484; this version posted June 19, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. 20 ABSTRACT 21 Genes are ‘born’, and eventually they ‘die’.
    [Show full text]
  • Flowering Plants List
    The Islay Natural History Trust's R* Japanese Red-cedar Cryptomeria japonica C Alder Alnus glutinosa L* Grey Alder A.incana Checklist of the Wild Flowers of Islay and Jura This list includes all species reliably reported on Islay and Jura. The distribution and status of many species is poorly known and all records are valuable. Please send them, with localities and dates, to the Islay Wildlife Information Centre, Port Charlotte, Isle of Islay, PA48 7TX. The following status indications are necessarily only approximate and are based on the number of 10 km squares where the plant occurs, out of the 14 covering Islay. C=widespread, usually common, 8 or more squares, L=less widespread, but can be common suitable habitat, 3-7 squares. R=rare or very local, 1 or 2 squares only. *= introduced or escaped. +=needs confirming. J=Jura only. O=old records, pre-1950. LYCOPODIACEAE CUPRESSACEAE R* Hornbeam Carpinus betulus L Fir Clubmoss Huperzia selago R* Gowen Cypress Cupressus goveniana C Hazel Corylus avellana J Stag’s-horn Clubmoss Lycopodium clavatum L* Lawson’s Cypress Chamaecyparis lawsoniana CHENOPODIACEAE R Alpine Clubmoss Diphasiastrum alpinum R* Western Red-cedar Thuja plicata C Fat-hen Chenopodium album SELAGINELLACEAE C Juniper Juniperus communis commmunis C Spear-leaved Orache Atriplex prostrata C Lesser Clubmoss Selaginella selaginoides J J.communis nana C Babington’s Orache A.glabriuscula ISOETACEAE ARAUCARIACEAE C Common Orache A.patula L Quillwort Isoetes lacustris R* Monkey-puzzle Araucaria araucana L Frosted Orache A.laciniata
    [Show full text]
  • Ecological Checklist of the Missouri Flora for Floristic Quality Assessment
    Ladd, D. and J.R. Thomas. 2015. Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora for Floristic Quality Assessment. Phytoneuron 2015-12: 1–274. Published 12 February 2015. ISSN 2153 733X ECOLOGICAL CHECKLIST OF THE MISSOURI FLORA FOR FLORISTIC QUALITY ASSESSMENT DOUGLAS LADD The Nature Conservancy 2800 S. Brentwood Blvd. St. Louis, Missouri 63144 [email protected] JUSTIN R. THOMAS Institute of Botanical Training, LLC 111 County Road 3260 Salem, Missouri 65560 [email protected] ABSTRACT An annotated checklist of the 2,961 vascular taxa comprising the flora of Missouri is presented, with conservatism rankings for Floristic Quality Assessment. The list also provides standardized acronyms for each taxon and information on nativity, physiognomy, and wetness ratings. Annotated comments for selected taxa provide taxonomic, floristic, and ecological information, particularly for taxa not recognized in recent treatments of the Missouri flora. Synonymy crosswalks are provided for three references commonly used in Missouri. A discussion of the concept and application of Floristic Quality Assessment is presented. To accurately reflect ecological and taxonomic relationships, new combinations are validated for two distinct taxa, Dichanthelium ashei and D. werneri , and problems in application of infraspecific taxon names within Quercus shumardii are clarified. CONTENTS Introduction Species conservatism and floristic quality Application of Floristic Quality Assessment Checklist: Rationale and methods Nomenclature and taxonomic concepts Synonymy Acronyms Physiognomy, nativity, and wetness Summary of the Missouri flora Conclusion Annotated comments for checklist taxa Acknowledgements Literature Cited Ecological checklist of the Missouri flora Table 1. C values, physiognomy, and common names Table 2. Synonymy crosswalk Table 3. Wetness ratings and plant families INTRODUCTION This list was developed as part of a revised and expanded system for Floristic Quality Assessment (FQA) in Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome Duplications Followed by Tandem Duplications Drive Diversification of the Protein Modifier SUMO in Angiosperms
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) Whole-genome duplications followed by tandem duplications drive diversification of the protein modifier SUMO in Angiosperms Hammoudi, V.; Vlachakis, G.; Schranz, M.E.; van den Burg, H.A. DOI 10.1111/nph.13911 Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Published in New Phytologist Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Hammoudi, V., Vlachakis, G., Schranz, M. E., & van den Burg, H. A. (2016). Whole-genome duplications followed by tandem duplications drive diversification of the protein modifier SUMO in Angiosperms. New Phytologist, 211(1), 172-185. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.13911 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:30 Sep 2021 Research Whole-genome duplications followed by tandem duplications drive diversification of the protein modifier SUMO in Angiosperms Valentin Hammoudi1, Georgios Vlachakis1, M.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating System Shifts and Transposable Element Evolution in the Plant
    Ågren et al. BMC Genomics 2014, 15:602 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2164/15/602 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Mating system shifts and transposable element evolution in the plant genus Capsella J Arvid Ågren1*, Wei Wang1, Daniel Koenig2, Barbara Neuffer3, Detlef Weigel2 and Stephen I Wright1 Abstract Background: Despite having predominately deleterious fitness effects, transposable elements (TEs) are major constituents of eukaryote genomes in general and of plant genomes in particular. Although the proportion of the genome made up of TEs varies at least four-fold across plants, the relative importance of the evolutionary forces shaping variation in TE abundance and distributions across taxa remains unclear. Under several theoretical models, mating system plays an important role in governing the evolutionary dynamics of TEs. Here, we use the recently sequenced Capsella rubella reference genome and short-read whole genome sequencing of multiple individuals to quantify abundance, genome distributions, and population frequencies of TEs in three recently diverged species of differing mating system, two self-compatible species (C. rubella and C. orientalis) and their self-incompatible outcrossing relative, C. grandiflora. Results: We detect different dynamics of TE evolution in our two self-compatible species; C. rubella shows a small increase in transposon copy number, while C. orientalis shows a substantial decrease relative to C. grandiflora. The direction of this change in copy number is genome wide and consistent across transposon classes. For insertions near genes, however, we detect the highest abundances in C. grandiflora. Finally, we also find differences in the population frequency distributions across the three species. Conclusion: Overall, our results suggest that the evolution of selfing may have different effects on TE evolution on a short and on a long timescale.
    [Show full text]
  • Brassicaceae Mustards
    Brassicaceae mustards Nearly 3000 species in 340 genera comprise this large family. Oils, seeds, greens and condiments are produced from cultivated species. Page | 343 Flowers typically are four-merous: petals and sepals, with six stamens and a single superior ovary, divided into two locules. The inflorescence is terminal, with the flowers borne singly or in racemes. It is not unusual to have fruit and flowers present simultaneously. Fruits are capsules, spliting longitudinally or siliques. Leaves are alternate, pinnately lobed. Ours are all herbaceous plants. Keys (first based on flower colour. Mature fruits are often required to confirm species.) A. Flowers yellow. Key 1 aa. Flowers white, green or violet, but not yellow. Key 2 Key 1 Flowers yellow. A. Fruits < 6mm long, <3 times longer than wide. B B. Leaves entire or serrate. C C. Leaves glossy; fruit oval and smooth. Camelina cc. Leaves rugose; fruit round and rugose. Neslia bb. Leaves palmately lobed or finely cleft. D D. Leaves finely divided; fruit 2 connate nutlets. Coronopus dd. Leaves at least the lower lobed; fruit oblong and not Rorippa doubled. aa. Fruits >6mm long, 4 or more times longer than wide. E E. Fruit indehiscent; the septum fleshy and hardening, breaking up into Raphanus single-seeded sections. ee. Fruit dehiscent lengthwise. F F. Seeds in 2 rows in each locule. Diplotaxis ff. Seeds in 1 row in each locule. G G. Leaves pinnate or pinnately lobed. H H. Racemes bracteate. Erucastrum hh. Racemes not bracteate. I I. Fruits appressed; flowers 3mm wide. Sisymbrium ii. Fruits not appressed, or if so flowers J large.
    [Show full text]
  • Mandakova TPC2010, Suppl Mat.Pdf
    Supplemental Data. Mandáková et al. (2010). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.074526 Supplemental Figure 1. A Three-Way Comparison of the Relative Position of Corresponding Synteny Blocks of Stenopetalum nutans (SN), S. lineare (SL) and Ballantinia antipoda (BA) Relative to the Reference Ancestral Crucifer Karyotype (ACK). In the main panel of the image, each of the three modern karyotypes is presented in a radial layout. Within each of the three karyotypes, ideograms are ordered and oriented in the outward direction (corresponding to the same counter-clockwise scale progression of Figure 3). Each line connects a pair of genomic positions on two different modern genomes that are syntenically related to the same genomic block in the ACK. For example, the light-blue line at the top of the figure between SL and SN corresponds to synteny with the genomic block U2 on AK7. Each of the eight small panels shows synteny relationships between the three modern genomes for a specific ancestral chromosome (AK1-8). Supplemental Data. Mandáková et al. (2010). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.074526 Supplemental Figure 2. The Unique Rearrangement of the AK8(#1)-like Homoeologue Shared by All Analyzed Species. This rearrangement was mediated by two subsequent paracentric inversions involving two thirds of genomic block W1 and a major part of X1. In S. lineare, block V1 underwent a secondary translocation to another chromosome. The rearrangement not shown for Arabidella eremigena and Blennodia canescens. Supplemental Data. Mandáková et al. (2010). Plant Cell 10.1105/tpc.110.074526 Supplemental Figure 3. Phylogeny of the Malate Synthase (MS) (TrN + Γ + I) Showing the Position of Sequences from the Australian Species (in Bold) in the Context of Other Brassicaceae Taxa.
    [Show full text]