Select Committee on Tobacco Harm Reduction

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Select Committee on Tobacco Harm Reduction The Senate Select Committee on Tobacco Harm Reduction Report December 2020 © Commonwealth of Australia 2020 ISBN 978-1-76093-170-4 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 International License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/. Printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra. Contents Committee membership ...................................................................................................................... Committee report by the majority ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter 1—Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 Conduct of the inquiry ........................................................................................................................ 3 World Health Organisation Guidelines ............................................................................................ 4 What are electronic cigarettes? ........................................................................................................... 5 Previous inquiries ................................................................................................................................ 7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................................ 7 References to Hansard ......................................................................................................................... 7 Structure of the report ......................................................................................................................... 7 Chapter 2—The Australian context ................................................................................................. 9 Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 9 Tobacco smoking in Australia ............................................................................................................ 9 Use of e-cigarettes .............................................................................................................................. 10 The Australian Government's position on e-cigarettes ................................................................ 11 Regulation as a therapeutic good .................................................................................................... 13 Access to unapproved therapeutic goods ........................................................................... 15 Pathway for approval ............................................................................................................. 16 Relevant decisions of the Therapeutic Goods Administration ........................................ 17 Proposal to prohibit the importation of e-cigarettes containing nicotine ....................... 19 Chapter 3—Jurisdictional comparison .......................................................................................... 21 Overview ............................................................................................................................................. 21 World Health Organization .............................................................................................................. 21 Regulatory responses to e-cigarettes in other jurisdictions ......................................................... 22 New Zealand ........................................................................................................................... 24 The United States .................................................................................................................... 26 The European Union .............................................................................................................. 28 The United Kingdom……………………………………………………………………….. 28 iii Chapter 4—Issues .............................................................................................................................. 31 Harm reduction .................................................................................................................................. 32 Personal experience of e-cigarette use ................................................................................. 34 The health impacts of e-cigarettes ........................................................................................ 36 Negative impacts ................................................................................................................................ 43 Uptake by youth and non-smokers and the 'gateway effect' ........................................... 43 Nicotine toxicity ...................................................................................................................... 47 Dual use .................................................................................................................................... 50 E-cigarettes and smoking cessation ................................................................................................. 52 The evidence on smoking cessation ..................................................................................... 55 Impact of e-cigarettes on smoking prevalence ................................................................... 58 The role of the tobacco industry ...................................................................................................... 59 Chapter 5—Regulatory approaches ............................................................................................... 63 Evidence received on the prescription-based model .................................................................... 63 Regulation as a consumer good ....................................................................................................... 71 Restrictions .......................................................................................................................................... 75 Restrictions on sale and distribution .................................................................................... 75 Restrictions on promotion and advertising ........................................................................ 77 Product quality and safety..................................................................................................... 79 Restrictions on the use of flavours and other ingredients ................................................ 80 Chapter 6—Committee view ........................................................................................................... 83 Renewed efforts to reduce smoking prevalence ................................................................ 86 Senator the Hon Sarah Henderson's additional comments ...................................................... 91 Senator Griff's additional comments ............................................................................................ 97 Australian Greens' additional comments ................................................................................... 105 Chair's report.................................................................................................................................... 113 Chair's foreword .............................................................................................................................. 115 Chapter 1 - Introduction ................................................................................................................ 117 Chapter 2 - The Australian context .............................................................................................. 123 Chapter 3 - Jurisdictional comparison ........................................................................................ 135 Chapter 4 - Personal accounts ....................................................................................................... 143 Chapter 5 - Issues ............................................................................................................................ 179 iv Chapter 6 - Regulatory approaches .............................................................................................. 203 Chapter 7 - Chair's view ................................................................................................................. 225 Appendix 1—Submissions, answers to questions on notice and additional documents . 235 Appendix 2—Public hearings ....................................................................................................... 263 v Committee membership Chair Senator Hollie Hughes LP, NSW Deputy Chair Senator Tony Sheldon ALP, NSW Members Senator the Hon Matthew Canavan NATS, QLD Senator the Hon Sarah Henderson LP, VIC Senator Anne Urquhart ALP, TAS Senator Stirling Griff CA, SA Participating members Senator Rachel Siewert AG, WA Department of the Senate Ph: 02 6277 3555 PO Box 6100 Fax: 02 6277 5719 Parliament House E-mail: [email protected] Canberra ACT 2600 Web: www.aph.gov.au/select_tobaccoharmreduction vi Committee Report by the Majority 1 2 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 On 6 October 2020, the Senate established the Select Committee on Tobacco Harm Reduction (the committee) to inquire into
Recommended publications
  • Marketing of Menthol Cigarettes and Consumer Perceptions Joshua Rising1*, Lori Alexander2
    Rising and Alexander Tobacco Induced Diseases 2011, 9(Suppl 1):S2 http://www.tobaccoinduceddiseases.com/content/9/S1/S2 REVIEW Open Access Marketing of menthol cigarettes and consumer perceptions Joshua Rising1*, Lori Alexander2 Abstract In order to more fully understand why individuals smoke menthol cigarettes, it is important to understand the perceptions held by youth and adults regarding menthol cigarettes. Perceptions are driven by many factors, and one factor that can be important is marketing. This review seeks to examine what role, if any, the marketing of menthol cigarettes plays in the formation of consumer perceptions of menthol cigarettes. The available literature suggests that menthol cigarettes may be perceived as safer choices than non-menthol cigarettes. Furthermore, there is significant overlap between menthol cigarette advertising campaigns and the perceptions of these products held by consumers. The marketing of menthol cigarettes has been higher in publications and venues whose target audiences are Blacks/African Americans. Finally, there appears to have been changes in cigarette menthol content over the past decade, which has been viewed by some researchers as an effort to attract different types of smokers. Review Summarized in this review are 35 articles found to The marketing of cigarettes is a significant expenditure have either direct relevance to these questions, or were for the tobacco industry; in 2006, the tobacco industry used to provide relevant background information. Many spent a total of $12.49 billion on advertising and promo- ofthesearticleswereidentifiedthroughareviewofthe tion of cigarettes including menthol brands, which literature conducted by the National Cancer Institute in represent 20% of the market share [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Native American Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Ethnozoology Herman A
    IK: Other Ways of Knowing A publication of The Interinstitutional Center for Indigenous Knowledge at The Pennsylvania State University Libraries Editors: Audrey Maretzki Amy Paster Helen Sheehy Managing Editor: Mark Mattson Associate Editor: Abigail Houston Assistant Editors: Teodora Hasegan Rachel Nill Section Editor: Nonny Schlotzhauer A publication of Penn State Library’s Open Publishing Cover photo taken by Nick Vanoster ISSN: 2377-3413 doi:10.18113/P8ik360314 IK: Other Ways of Knowing Table of Contents CONTENTS FRONT MATTER From the Editors………………………………………………………………………………………...i-ii PEER REVIEWED Integrating Traditional Ecological Knowledge with Western Science for Optimal Natural Resource Management Serra Jeanette Hoagland……………………………………………………………………………….1-15 Strokes Unfolding Unexplored World: Drawing as an Instrument to Know the World of Aadivasi Children in India Rajashri Ashok Tikhe………………………………………………………………………………...16-29 Dancing Together: The Lakota Sun Dance and Ethical Intercultural Exchange Ronan Hallowell……………………………………………………………………………………...30-52 BOARD REVIEWED Field Report: Collecting Data on the Influence of Culture and Indigenous Knowledge on Breast Cancer Among Women in Nigeria Bilikisu Elewonibi and Rhonda BeLue………………………………………………………………53-59 Prioritizing Women’s Knowledge in Climate Change: Preparing for My Dissertation Research in Indonesia Sarah Eissler………………………………………………………………………………………….60-66 The Library for Food Sovereignty: A Field Report Freya Yost…………………………………………………………………………………………….67-73 REVIEWS AND RESOURCES A Review of
    [Show full text]
  • Barton Deakin Standing Brief: Coalition Government Ministry 27 August 2018
    Barton Deakin Standing Brief: Coalition Government Ministry 27 August 2018 TITLE MINISTER Prime Minister The Hon Scott Morrison MP Minister for Indigenous Affairs Senator the Hon Nigel Scullion Assistant Minister to the Prime Minister Mr Steve Irons MP Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Infrastructure, Transport and The Hon Michael McCormack Regional Development Minister for Regional Services, Sport, Local Government and Senator the Hon Bridget McKenzie Decentralisation Minister for Cities, Urban Infrastructure and Population The Hon Alan Tudge MP Assistant Minister to the Deputy Prime Minister Mr Andrew Broad MP Assistant Minister for Regional Development and Territories The Hon Sussan Ley MP Assistant Minister for Roads and Transport Mr Scott Buchholz MP Treasurer The Hon Josh Frydenberg MP Assistant Treasurer The Hon Stuart Robert MP Assistant Minister for Treasury and Finance Senator the Hon Zed Seselja Minister for Finance and the Public Service Senator the Hon Mathias Cormann (Vice-President of the Executive Council) (Leader of the Government in the Senate) Special Minister of State The Hon Alex Hawke MP Minister for Defence The Hon Christopher Pyne MP (Leader of the House) Minister for Defence Industry The Hon Steven Ciobo MP Minister for Veterans Affairs The Hon Darren Chester MP Minister for Defence Personnel The Hon Darren Chester MP (Deputy Leader of the House) Minister Assisting the Prime Minister for the Centenary of ANAC The Hon Darren Chester MP Assistant Minister for Defence Senator David Fawcett Minister for Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • Talking Tobacco Harm Reduction
    TALKING TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION // WHAT’S HARM REDUCTION? Harm reduction is a range of Do they make sunbathing or pragmatic policies, regulations driving 100% risk-free? and actions. Reducing health risks by providing less harmful forms No – but they do make them of products or substances, less harmful by reducing the or by encouraging less risky risk of illness or injury. behaviours. Sun cream and seat belts are We believe non-combustible nicotine Next Generation Products everyday examples of harm (NGPs) are also an effective form of reduction in action. harm reduction for adult smokers who wish to continue using nicotine – relative to conventional cigarettes. // INTRODUCING TOBACCO HARM REDUCTION Science demonstrates smoking a For adult smokers, the greatest risk of cigarette is the most harmful way to disease stems from burning tobacco and consume nicotine. inhaling the smoke. // WHAT IS THR? Tobacco smoke contains over 7000 The undisputed best action adult chemicals – nicotine is one of them. smokers can take to improve their Around 100 are classified by public health is to stop all tobacco and health experts as causes or potential nicotine use entirely, but many are not causes of smoking-related disease. interested or willing to take this step. Numerous public health bodies1 While the science suggests nicotine is believe transitioning to nicotine addictive and not risk-free, it’s neither products that are substantially less carcinogenic nor the primary cause of harmful than inhaled tobacco smoke smoking-related diseases. is their next best option – we agree. Contains 7000+ Contains chemicals, 100 significantly of them harmful fewer and lower or potentially levels of harmful harmful.
    [Show full text]
  • Comments to the FDA on Swedish Match
    November 25, 2014 Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061 Rockville, MD 20852 Re: Docket No. FDA-2014-N-1051, Modified Risk Tobacco Product Applications: Applications for 10 Products Submitted by Swedish Match North America, Inc. The undersigned organizations submit these comments in response to the announcement for public comment of a modified risk tobacco product application by Swedish Match North America, Inc. (“Swedish Match” or “the company”) for 10 tobacco products.1 The Swedish Match application presents evidence to FDA that support the proposition that Swedish smokers who switch entirely to snus derive individual health benefits. Swedish Match also provides evidence indicating that the high prevalence of snus usage among men in Sweden has contributed to a lower frequency of tobacco-related disease and mortality than is found in comparable populations with higher cigarette smoking rates. This information suggests that if Swedish Match presents convincing evidence that being permitted to make a modified risk claim would lead smokers that would not otherwise quit smoking to switch completely to one of these Swedish snus products, without leading to significant use among youth, such an application would deserve serious consideration. However, as discussed at length in Part I below, the modified risk application submitted by Swedish Match in its current form must be denied by FDA because it is legally defective under federal law. Although Swedish Match seeks a modified risk order under Section 911 of the Food, Drug & Cosmetic Act (FDCA), as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act (“Tobacco Control Act” or “TCA”), Swedish Match does not propose to make a claim concerning the relative risk for the listed snus products.
    [Show full text]
  • An Endgame for Tobacco? by the Various Proposals
    Editorial Tob Control: first published as 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2013-050989 on 15 April 2013. Downloaded from then to evaluate what might be achieved An endgame for tobacco? by the various proposals. The latter requires contemplation of each strategy’s Kenneth E Warner potential outcomes, good and undesirable, and the political, legal, ethical, economic, regulatory and social barriers to realising ABSTRACT great successes of many national anti- the strategy’s implementation. Finally, the Since its origins in the 1960s, tobacco control smoking campaigns notwithstanding, the very idea of what constitutes the end of has achieved remarkable success against the pandemic persists. In many developed the endgame needs to be addressed. scourge of tobacco-produced disease and countries with the most robust tobacco Strikingly, to date, there has never been a death. Yet tobacco use, especially cigarette control efforts, the decline in smoking serious discussion within the tobacco smoking, remains the world's leading cause of prevalence has slowed to a trickle. control community about what would preventable premature death and is likely to Evidence-based policies seem incapable of constitute a final victory in tobacco do so for decades to come. Evidence-based substantially hastening the demise of control. Would it be a reduction in 5 policies seem incapable of substantially smoking in these countries. In LMICs, smoking-produced deaths to, say, 10% of hastening the demise of smoking. Slowness in smoking is on the rise. The net effect is current levels?
    [Show full text]
  • Native Sons and Daughters Program Manual
    NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS PROGRAMS® PROGRAM MANUAL National Longhouse, Ltd. National Longhouse, Ltd. 4141 Rockside Road Suite 150 Independence, OH 44131-2594 Copyright © 2007, 2014 National Longhouse, Ltd. All rights reserved. International copyright secured. No part of this manual may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, now known or hereafter invented, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, xerography, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written consent of National Longhouse, Ltd. Printed in the United States of America EDITORS: Edition 1 - Barry Yamaji National Longhouse, Native Sons And Daughters Programs, Native Dads And Sons, Native Moms And Sons, Native Moms And Daughters are registered trademarks of National Longhouse, Ltd. Native Dads And Daughters, Native Sons And Daughters, NS&D Pathfinders are servicemarks of National Longhouse TABLE of CONTENTS FOREWORD xi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS xiii CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION 1 Why NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 2 What Are NATIVE SONS AND DAUGHTERS® Programs? 4 Program Format History 4 Program Overview 10 CHAPTER 2: ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES 15 Organizational Levels 16 Administrative Levels 17 National Longhouse, Ltd. 18 Regional Advisory Lodge 21 Local Longhouse 22 Nations 24 Tribes 25 CHAPTER 3: THE TRIBE 29 Preparing for a Tribe Meeting 30 Tribe Meetings 32 iii Table of Contents A Sample Tribe Meeting Procedure 34 Sample Closing Prayers 36 Tips for a Successful Meeting 37 The Parents' Meeting 38 CHAPTER 4: AWARDS, PATCHES, PROGRAM
    [Show full text]
  • 1 August 18, 2021 Via E-Mail and U.S. Mail Hon. Janet Woodcock Acting
    August 18, 2021 Via E-Mail and U.S. Mail Hon. Janet Woodcock Acting Commissioner Food and Drug Administration 10903 New Hampshire Avenue Silver Spring, MD 20993-0002 Dear Commissioner Woodcock: High-potency nicotine products sold in youth-friendly flavors have swamped the marketplace. These flavored products—from e-cigarettes to oral nicotine pouches—are inherently attractive to youth, a problem compounded when they are marketed in ways that further entice children and teens. Lack of effective national regulation of such products would all but guarantee that a new generation of young people will needlessly become addicted to nicotine. The Food and Drug Administration has the power to regulate these harmful products, and we implore you to take swift, effective measures to protect America’s youth. These products should not be on the market in the first place, as they have not received marketing orders required by Section 910 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as amended by the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. As the FDA now considers whether to grant Premarket Tobacco Product Applications (PMTAs) for these products and allow them to stay on the market, the undersigned Attorneys General urge you to take the following measures: (1) prohibit all non-tobacco flavors—including menthol, (2) limit the amount of nicotine in these products, and (3) impose marketing restrictions and effective age verification to prevent youth access and appeal. Although the full scope of the health risks posed by e-cigarettes and the newest generation of oral nicotine products is not yet known—including how their harm compares to that of traditional tobacco products—these products contain nicotine and will serve as a gateway to nicotine addiction for young people.
    [Show full text]
  • Coalition's Climate Push
    AUTHOR: Greg Brown SECTION: GENERAL NEWS ARTICLE TYPE: NEWS ITEM AUDIENCE : 94,448 PAGE: 1 PRINTED SIZE: 493.00cm² REGION: National MARKET: Australia ASR: AUD 12,683 WORDS: 946 ITEM ID: 1400466763 18 FEB, 2021 MPs in drive for nuclear energy The Australian, Australia Page 1 of 3 COALITION’S CLIMATE PUSH MPs in drive for nuclear energy EXCLUSIVE GREG BROWN Nationals senators have drafted legislation allowing the Clean Energy Finance Corporation to invest in nuclear power as two- thirds of Coalition MPs backed lifting the ban on the controver- sial fuel source to help shift the nation to a carbon-neutral future. The block of five Nationals senators, led by Bridget McKen- zie and Matt Canavan, will move an amendment to legislation es- tablishing a $1bn arm at the green bank to allow it to invest in nuclear generators, high-energy, low-emissions (HELE), coal-fired power stations and carbon capture and storage technology. The Nationals’ move comes as a survey of 71 Coalition back- benchers conducted by The Aus- tralian revealed that 48 were in favour of lifting the longstanding prohibition on nuclear power in the EPBC act. Liberal MPs Andrew Laming, John Alexander and Gerard Ren- © News Pty Limited. No redistribution is permitted. This content can only be copied and communicated with a copyright licence. AUTHOR: Greg Brown SECTION: GENERAL NEWS ARTICLE TYPE: NEWS ITEM AUDIENCE : 94,448 PAGE: 1 PRINTED SIZE: 493.00cm² REGION: National MARKET: Australia ASR: AUD 12,683 WORDS: 946 ITEM ID: 1400466763 18 FEB, 2021 MPs in drive for nuclear energy The Australian, Australia Page 2 of 3 nick are among backbenchers this stage”.
    [Show full text]
  • Responses from Legislation Proponents — Report 4 of 20201
    Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights Report 4 of 2020 Responses from legislation proponents — 1 Report 4 of 2020 1 This can be cited as: Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights, Responses from legislation proponents, Report 4 of 2020; [2020] AUPJCHR 62. THE HON PETER DUTTON MP MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS Ref No: MS20-000279 Senator the Hon Sarah Henderson Chair Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights Parliament House CANBERRA ACT 2600 5~. Dear Se¢itor Henderson Thank you for your letter dated 6 Febrary 2020 requesting my response in relation to the human rights compatibility of the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019. I note the Committee has sought further information regarding the compatibility of the proposed measures with Australia's international human rights obligations. My response for the Committee's consideration is attached. Yours sincerely o o-s/J..o PETER DUTTON Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Telephone: (02) 6277 7860 Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2019 The Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights' (the Committee's) Report 1 of 2020 has identified that item 125 of the Bill, which inserts new section 400.lOA into the Criminal Code Act 1995, may engage the right to a fair trial and fair hearing in Article 14 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR). Article 14(1) provides that: All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charges against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law.
    [Show full text]
  • A FOCUS on HARM REDUCTION Why It
    A FOCUS ON HARM REDUCTION Why it mattersSUSTAINABILITY FOCUS REPORT 2013: How we address the public health impact of our products A nicotine molecule In this report Focusing on the facts 2 At the core of our business strategy 3 Innovative nicotine products 4 ‘Safer’ tobacco products: the research 7 So, what’s next? 9 Our Chief Executive on why it matters b British American Tobacco Harm reduction: sustainability focus report 2013 Because it’s crucial to the future of our business. Surely tobacco harm reduction should just be about What areas are you concentrating on? getting people to quit smoking? Our approach to harm reduction has two distinct areas: The only way to be certain of avoiding the serious health risks nicotine-based alternatives and reduced-risk tobacco products. associated with smoking is not to smoke at all. However, despite In the nicotine category, we have established a stand-alone increasingly strict tobacco control policies, many people continue business solely dedicated to this area. This brings together our to smoke. And the World Health Organisation estimates that existing Nicoventures business with CN Creative, the e-cigarette 1 many more will do so in the future . So realistically the ‘quit or die’ company we acquired at the end of last year, into a single business approach to reducing the public health impact of smoking simply which will continue to operate under the Nicoventures name. isn’t enough. This business has already launched its first e-cigarette in the UK, For adults that choose to continue to smoke, tobacco harm which will be expanded into further markets in the coming year.
    [Show full text]
  • List of References Submitted During the Public Consultation
    Bibliography of the Sources Examined for the Opinion on the Addictiveness and Attractiveness of Tobacco Additives ACSCAN (American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network), American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids, American Legacy Foundation. Submission to U.S. Food and Drug Administration re Docket No. FDA- 2010-N-0207, 2010; July 26. Available from: URL: http://www.tobaccofreekids.org/reports/fda/regulatory_docs/Comments%20to%20 FDA%20RFI%20re%20youth%20and%20minority%20marketing%207-26-10.pdf Adam T, McAughey J, McGrath C, Mocker C, Zimmermann R. Simultaneous on-line size and chemical analysis of gas phase and particulate phase of cigarette mainstream smoke. Anal Bioanal Chem 2009; 394:1193-203. Adam T, Mitschke S, Streibel T, Baker RR, Zimmermann R. Puff-by-puff resolved characterisation of cigarette mainstream smoke by single photon ionisation (SPI)- time-of-flight mass spectrometry (TOFMS): comparison of the 2R4F research cigarette and pure Burley, Virginia, Oriental and Maryland tobacco cigarettes. Anal Chim Acta. 2006 Jul 21;572(2):219-29. Epub 2006; May 22. Ahijevych K, Garrett BE. Menthol pharmacology and its potential impact on cigarette smoking behaviour. Nicotine Tob Res 2004; 6 Suppl 1:S17-28. Ahijevych K, Gillespie J, Demirci M, Jagadeesh J. Menthol and nonmenthol cigarettes and smoke exposure in black and white women. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1996; 53:355-60. Ahijevych K, Parsley LA. Smoke constituent exposure and stage of change in black and white women cigarette smokers. Addict Behav 1999; 24:115-20. Akehurst BC Tobacco. Second edition. Tropical Agriculture Series. Longman. London and New York. 1981; Pp.
    [Show full text]