DOCSLIB.ORG

Consultation Response Document Draft 220805 TOR Master Version

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Consultation Response Document Draft 220805 TOR Master Version Portland energy recovery facility Consultation response summary document August 2021 PORTLAND ENERGY RECOVERY FACILITY CONSULTATION RESPONSE SUMMARY DOCUMENT POWERFUEL PORTLAND LIMITED AUGUST 2021 Portland Energy Recovery Facility, Portland Port Powerfuel Portland Limited Contents Summary 1. Introduction 2. Consultation response schedules Appendices Appendix A: Response to UKWIN planning application submission Appendix B: Summary response to public comments Terence O’Rourke Limited 2 Portland Energy Recovery Facility, Portland Port Powerfuel Portland Limited 1. Introduction Dorset Council’s request for further information and clarification 1.1 In September 2020, Powerfuel Portland Ltd submitted a full planning application to Dorset Council for the construction of an energy recovery facility (ERF) with ancillary buildings and works including administrative facilities, gatehouse and weighbridge, parking and circulation areas, cable routes to ship berths and existing off-site electrical sub-station, with site access through Portland Port from Castletown (application reference: WP/20/00692/DCC) on land within Portland Port. 1.2 The application was accompanied by an environmental statement (ES) prepared in accordance with the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 (as amended; hereafter the EIA Regulations), which provides an assessment of the likely significant effects associated with its construction and operation. 1.3 Dorset Council has consulted on the application and also appointed Tetra Tech to undertake a review of the ES, which ensured that the council had access to sufficient expertise to examine the ES. Representations have been submitted to Dorset Council by consultees, members of the public and other interested parties in response to the consultation on the planning application. Dorset Council has taken these representations into account in its consideration of the application. 1.4 Following the consultations, the council has formally requested additional information and clarification in a letter dated 30 April 2021. The council confirms that it considers some of the information requested constitutes ‘further environmental information’, and where this is the case, it is requested in accordance with Regulation 25 of the EIA Regulations and Section 62(3) of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990. 1.5 An ES Addendum has been prepared to review the council’s letter and provide the information that is considered to be ‘further environmental information’ under Regulation 25 of the EIA Regulations. It forms an addendum to the ES. The purpose of this document 1.6 The council’s letter also requests that further responses be given to topic-based issues raised in representations to the first consultation. In some cases, reference is made in the council’s Regulation 25 letter to a specific consultee response, or aspects that are most relevant to the consideration of that topic area. 1.7 To address these specific requests, the applicant’s response is provided in this Consultation Response Summary Document (CRSD) to the range of detailed technical points that were raised by statutory consultees and technically competent consultees during the first consultation. 1.8 Specifically, the CRSD covers the following topic areas requested by the council’s request for further information: Terence O’Rourke Limited 3 Portland Energy Recovery Facility, Portland Port Powerfuel Portland Limited • Design and materials (point 3) - also covered in detail in the DAS Addendum and summarised in chapter 3 of the SPSS • Landscape (point 4) • Health (point 6) • Historic environment (point 9) • Ecology (point 11) • Combined heat and power (CHP) - District heating (point 13) • Electricity generation and distribution (point 15) • Shore power (point 17) • Air quality (point 21) • Carbon balance and greenhouse gas emissions – including UKWIN (points 22 and 23) also covered in detail in the ES Addendum and summarised in chapter 3 of the SPSS • Traffic (point 26) • Surface water drainage (point 28) • Contamination and geology (point 29) covered in detail in the ES Addendum • Economic effects and jobs (point 33) • Need and waste arisings (points 30, 31 and 32) – also covered in detail in the Waste Need Paper and summarised in chapter 3 of the SPSS • Compliance with development plan policy (point 34) – also covered in detail in chapter 4 of the SPSS 1.9 For completeness, the CRD also covers some other topic areas where consultees have made comments but are not covered by the councils request for further information. • Alternative sites • Fall back scheme • World heritage site 1.10 Annex A provides the applicant’s response to UKWIN comments on the submission (point 23). 1.11 Annex B to this CRSD provides a summary response to a wide range of topic areas raised by the public Terence O’Rourke Limited 4 2. Consultation response schedules 1. Need and waste arisings Other consultees Item Topic Summary of consultation comment Applicant response Adams Hendry (on behalf of SPWI) 1.1 Need for the ERF in Paragraph 2.2 The Portland ERF is well located to manage Dorset’s residual waste, reducing the need for the context of managing export of residual waste out of the county and out of the country to other ERF facilities. It will Dorset residual waste and It would be reasonable to assume that the proposed Portland ERF would be also help to reduce the amount of residual waste that is sent to landfill for disposal, the least residual waste arising from limited to treating residual waste from within Dorset only and will not import waste sustainable method of management. outside of the Dorset area from elsewhere. This does not appear to be the case given the volumes of waste by road and or sea. that could be brought in by sea. The Waste Need Statement and Planning Supporting Statement demonstrate that there are already large volumes of residual waste arising within Dorset and this is expected to increase in Evidence to support waste No evidence is provided to support the volumes of RDF (arising from outside of future. These figures are derived from public statements issued by Dorset Council, including in arising figures provided. Dorset), that are stated in the application as being available to the ERF. the 2019 Dorset Waste Plan. The ERF will provide capacity to help Dorset to meet its own residual waste management needs and will also contribute towards meeting the regional and The importation of residual Great weight is given to the site’s location at a port and the intention to import national waste need. The ERF will also contribute towards meeting a local, regional, and waste by sea from outside residual waste from outside of the Dorset area by sea or by road is contrary to the national need for low carbon energy and economic growth. The Waste Need Paper presents of Dorset and compliance applicant’s stated need case and is contrary to the proximity principle. analysis in respect to the waste availability in the defined catchment area, taking account of with the proximity principle. existing capacity and potential planned capacity. It concludes that there is more than enough waste available with the catchment than could be managed by the Portland ERF, not accounting for potential sources of waste passing by Portland by sea. The proposed ERF is a merchant plant, not tied to a specific local authority contract. It is unreasonable to assume that such a plant would be restricted to waste arising in an administrative area. Whilst it is incorrect to say that ‘great weight’ is attributed to a port location, it is clearly a desirable attribute for an ERF to have direct access to a port facility to provide commercial flexibility and to enable waste to be brought to the site sustainably by sea [and the weight attached to the port location is also due to the opportunities to use the energy generated to provide shore power and district heating, both of which are not possible at other sites]. It is therefore a factor that should be given weight in the planning balance, among many other positive benefits associated with the proposed location at Portland Port. Figures provided in respect to potential waste sources are derived from the applicant’s market analysis and sector knowledge and expertise provided by its fuel supply partner. The proximity principle requires that an adequate network of waste disposal installations be established, and that waste should be disposed of in one of the nearest appropriate installations, by means of the most appropriate methods and technologies in order to ensure a high level of protection of the environment and public health. The importation of residual waste by sea or road from outside of Dorset to the Portland ERF, as one of the nearest appropriate installations, would therefore be entirely in accordance with the proximity principle. 1.2 Extent of ERF catchment Paragraph 2.3 The Dorset Waste Plan strategy is to reduce the export of its residual waste by providing area and importation of residual waste management capacity in Dorset in line with proximity and self-sufficiency waste Given that the justification for the proposal is to avoid residual waste being sent to principles. facilities in Hampshire and Somerset, why would it be acceptable to import waste Portland Energy Recovery Facility, Portland Port Powerfuel Portland Limited Item Topic Summary of consultation comment Applicant response from Hampshire and Somerset. The extended catchment necessary demonstrates However, this comment fundamentally misunderstands the dynamic nature of the waste the unsuitability of the site. market, where waste frequently crosses administrative boundaries where it is appropriate to do so. Under the principle of self-sufficiency, if waste is being exported from Dorset, then waste can also be imported. In Dorset the balance is heavily skewed such that Dorset exports all of its residual waste due to the absence of capacity. The ERF will significantly reduce the export of Dorset waste to other counties, but equally is able to import waste secured from the catchment area market where deemed appropriate and necessary.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • PORTLAND TOWN COUNCIL Council Offices Three Yards Close
    PORTLAND TOWN COUNCIL Council Offices Three Yards Close Fortuneswell PORTLAND Dorset DT5 1JN Tel: 01305 821638 E-mail: [email protected] 6th December 2018 Dear Councillor You are hereby summoned to attend a MEETING of the PLANNING & HIGHWAYS ADVISORY COMMITTEE, to be held in the PORTLAND COMMUNITY VENUE, PORTLAND on THURSDAY, 13TH DECEMBER 2018 commencing at 7.00 pm, when the business set out below will be transacted. It is the Council’s intention that all meetings of the Council and its Committees be recorded aurally. Please note change of day Thursday NOT Wednesday. Yours faithfully Karon McFarlane Town Clerk AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. Declarations of interest 3. Minutes of the meeting held on 21st November 2018 4. Matters arising since the last meeting 5. Public participation 6. Update on current planning applications 7. New planning applications notified by a) Weymouth & Portland Borough Council – Annex A b) Dorset County Council 8. Planning contravention issues 9. Neighbourhood plan update a) Second Homes Policy 10. Highway issues 11. Date of next meeting The Committee’s next meeting is scheduled to take place on Wednesday, 23rd January 2019 at Portland Community Venue, Three Yards Close, Portland starting at 7.00 pm. 2 PORTLAND TOWN COUNCIL PLANNING & HIGHWAYS ADVISORY COMMITTEE MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD IN EASTON METHODIST CHURCH HALL ON WEDNESDAY 21st NOVEMBER AT 7.00 PM PRESENT: Councillors Charlie Flack (Chairman), David Thurston, Jim Draper, Rob Hughes, Rod Wild, Chris Gover, Jo Atwell. IN ATTENDANCE: Andy Matthews (Neighbourhood Plan Working Group), one member of the public. 2779 – APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE Councillors Cocking and West.
    [Show full text]
  • Debbie Tulett Portland Resident
    Ref: Planning application: WP/20/00692/DCC OBJECTION TO THE POWERFUEL PORTLAND LTD PLANNING APPLICATION THIS PROPOSAL DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE DORSET WASTE PLAN 2019 (Adopted December 2019) POLICY 18 Biodiversity and geological interest Natura 2000 Sites Proposals for waste management facilities must not adversely affect the integrity of European or Ramsar or other internationally designated sites, either alone or in combination with other plans and projects. Sites of national and local importance: Development which adversely affects a Site of Special Scientific Interest will not normally be permitted, except where the benefits of the development at the site clearly outweigh the impacts on the features of the site. Policies 1-6 of the DWP establish that the benefits of the development of the site clearly do not outweigh the impacts of the features of the site and that there is no ‘need’ for a waste incinerator at this location other than for personal financial gain. This proposed site not only abuts a SSSI and is within metres of a SAC, but within 10km of the site there are numerous conservation designations. Therefore this proposal is in breach of the Dorset Waste Plan 2019 Policy 18 OVERVIEW: The Isle of Portland is a magnificent place for birdwatching, known as one of the best in Britain and is renowned for its migratory birds and passing seabirds. Habitats include cliffs, old quarries, farmland, dense scrub, rough pasture, clumps of trees and residential gardens. Portland is one of the UK’s best-known birdwatching areas. The abundance of Portland’s wildlife is remarkable, as the unique beauty of Portland has various habitats supporting a diverse range of animals, birds and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • The National Way Point Rally Handbook
    75th Anniversary National Way Point Rally The Way Point Handbook 2021 Issue 1.4 Contents Introduction, rules and the photographic competition 3 Anglian Area Way Points 7 North East Area Way Points 18 North Midlands Way Points 28 North West Area Way Points 36 Scotland Area Way Points 51 South East Way Points 58 South Midlands Way Points 67 South West Way Points 80 Wales Area Way Points 92 Close 99 75th Anniversary - National Way Point Rally (Issue 1.4) Introduction, rules including how to claim way points Introduction • This booklet represents the combined • We should remain mindful of guidance efforts of over 80 sections in suggesting at all times, checking we comply with on places for us all to visit on bikes. Many going and changing national and local thanks to them for their work in doing rules, for the start, the journey and the this destination when visiting Way Points • Unlike in normal years we have • This booklet is sized at A4 to aid compiled it in hope that all the location printing, page numbers aligned to the will be open as they have previously pdf pages been – we are sorry if they are not but • It is suggested you read the booklet on please do not blame us, blame Covid screen and only print out a few if any • This VMCC 75th Anniversary event is pages out designed to be run under national covid rules that may still in place We hope you enjoy some fine rides during this summer. Best wishes from the Area Reps 75th Anniversary - National Way Point Rally (Issue 1.4) Introduction, rules including how to claim way points General
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation Report August 2017 Purpose This Report Summarises Details of the Coverage of the Consultation and Responses Received with an Outline of Further Actions
    Heritage and Character Study – Consultation Report August 2017 Purpose This report summarises details of the coverage of the consultation and responses received with an outline of further actions. The report will be held on the Portland Plan website. Content 1. Coverage and number of responses 2. Responses raising matters of material consideration and how these will be reflected in the Neighbourhood Plan. 3. Response received from the Local Planning Authority (in full) • Annex A – Copy of Notice of Consultation Further actions • Submission of areas of correction or additions to the authors AEComm for their consideration in regard to an updated report. • Inclusion of items of material consideration with the Neighbourhood Plan development Neighbourhood Plan Working Group – August 2017 SECTION 1 Heritage and Character Study – Coverage and Response Statistics The press release announcing the consultation period (Annex A) was published in the Dorset Evening Echo and appeared on the front cover of the July Edition of the Free Portland News. The Press Release was also promoted through local social media. Social Media Hits – 2,587 Number of Web page views – 190 Number of Down loads – 49 Approximately – 50 people viewed the hard copy report Although only 8 specific responses were received including the Local Planning Authority the absence of negative comments implies that generally people were satisfied with the content. The study will remain on the Portland Plan Website SECTION 2 – SUBSTANTIVE MATTERS RAISED The table below includes the substantive matter(s) raised by consultees during the recent consultation and sets out how the draft Neighbourhood Plan (NP) intends to address the ‘issue’ or ‘opportunity’.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Flag Management Spaces for Gardens
    Introduction This document details the management of Green Flag gardens in Weymouth & Portland with the overall aim of maintaining and improving, where required, the quality of the gardens in terms of both physical features and the psychological benefits people gain from them. Historically there were three management plans and during the life time of the plans significant resources were used in an overhaul of the Green Flag gardens. The Council is now focused on a period of refinement in line with emerging needs. To do this, it is necessary to consider how the gardens fit within the priorities and policies of the Local Authority and to see how they are used and valued by the local and wider communities. Weymouth & Portland Borough Council has chosen to focus on the Green Flag Award as a means of raising and maintaining the standards of green spaces within the borough. The structure of this document follows Green Flag criteria. The shared aspects of garden management aims are: • To promote the application of Green Flag standards across the borough thereby raising standards overall. • To streamline the Green Flag Award application process in order to maximise resources available for consultation and the implementation of garden improvements. • To enable, as a result, an increase in the number of green spaces that Weymouth & Portland Borough Council can put forward for a Green Flag Award. Supporting Information For the purpose of the Green Flag desk top evaluation, an evidence folder containing further background information will be provided on the day of the site visit. The folder will contain information relating to operations, improvements, events, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Portland Energy Recovery Facility Representations on Behalf of Stop Portland Waste Incinerator
    Portland Energy Recovery Facility Representations on behalf of Stop Portland Waste Incinerator Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd. October 2020 Title Representations on Portland Energy Recovery Facility Client Stop Portland Waste Incinerator Project Number SPWI/1705 Status FINAL Report Number 0003 Adams Hendry Consulting Ltd. Sheridan House, 40 – 43 Jewry Street, Winchester, SO23 8RY T 01962 877414 E [email protected] www.adamshendry.co.uk Author Name: Emma Barnett Date: October 2020 Certified to ISO9001 Standard ISO 9001 Registration Number Q10324 Registered Office: Sheridan House, 40 – 43 Jewry Street, Winchester, SO23 8RY Registered in England No. 3804753 VAT Registration No. 807 9759 79 Portland Energy Recovery Facility Stop Portland Waste Incinerator | Version 1.0 Contents Contents ............................................................................................................................. 3 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 4 2 Need for the Proposal ................................................................................................... 5 3 The Proposed Development ....................................................................................... 13 4 Assessment Chapters ................................................................................................. 16 5 Compliance with the Statutory Development Plan ...................................................... 26 6 Summary and Conclusions ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Dorset and East Devon Coast for Inclusion in the World Heritage List
    Nomination of the Dorset and East Devon Coast for inclusion in the World Heritage List © Dorset County Council 2000 Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum June 2000 Published by Dorset County Council on behalf of Dorset County Council, Devon County Council and the Dorset Coast Forum. Publication of this nomination has been supported by English Nature and the Countryside Agency, and has been advised by the Joint Nature Conservation Committee and the British Geological Survey. Maps reproduced from Ordnance Survey maps with the permission of the Controller of HMSO. © Crown Copyright. All rights reserved. Licence Number: LA 076 570. Maps and diagrams reproduced/derived from British Geological Survey material with the permission of the British Geological Survey. © NERC. All rights reserved. Permit Number: IPR/4-2. Design and production by Sillson Communications +44 (0)1929 552233. Cover: Duria antiquior (A more ancient Dorset) by Henry De la Beche, c. 1830. The first published reconstruction of a past environment, based on the Lower Jurassic rocks and fossils of the Dorset and East Devon Coast. © Dorset County Council 2000 In April 1999 the Government announced that the Dorset and East Devon Coast would be one of the twenty-five cultural and natural sites to be included on the United Kingdom’s new Tentative List of sites for future nomination for World Heritage status. Eighteen sites from the United Kingdom and its Overseas Territories have already been inscribed on the World Heritage List, although only two other natural sites within the UK, St Kilda and the Giant’s Causeway, have been granted this status to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Notes to Accompany the Malvern U3A Fieldtrip to the Dorset Coast 1-5 October 2018
    Notes to accompany the Malvern U3A Fieldtrip to the Dorset Coast 1-5 October 2018 SUMMARY Travel to Lyme Regis; lunch ad hoc; 3:00 pm visit Lyme Regis Museum for Monday 01-Oct Museum tour with Chris Andrew, the Museum education officer and fossil walk guide; Arrive at our Weymouth hotel at approx. 5-5.30 pm Tuesday 02 -Oct No access to beaches in morning due to tides. Several stops on Portland and Fleet which are independent of tides Visit Lulworth Cove and Stair Hole; Poss ible visit to Durdle Door; Lunch at Wednesday 03-Oct Clavell’s Café, Kimmeridge; Visit to Etches Collection, Kimmeridge (with guided tour by Steve Etches). Return to Weymouth hotel. Thur sday 04 -Oct Burton Bradstock; Charmouth ; Bowleaze Cove Beaches are accessible in the morning. Fri day 05 -Oct Drive to Lyme Regis; g uided beach tour by Lyme Regis museum staff; Lunch ad hoc in Lyme Regis; Arrive Ledbury/Malvern in the late afternoon PICK-UP POINTS ( as per letter from Easytravel) Monday 1 Oct. Activity To Do Worcester pick-up Depart Croft Rd at 08.15 Barnards Green pick-up 08.45 Malvern Splash pick-up 08.50 Colwall Stone pick-up 09.10 Pick-ups and travel Ledbury Market House pick-up 09.30 to Lyme Regis Arrive Lyme Regis for Lunch - ad hoc 13.00 – 14.00 Visit Lyme Regis Museum where Chris Andrew from the Museum staff will take us for a tour of 15.00 to 16.30 the Geology Gallery. Depart Lyme Regis for Weymouth 16.30 Check in at Best Western Rembrandt Hotel, 17.30 Weymouth At 6.15pm , we will meet Alan Holiday , our guide for the coming week, in the Garden Lounge of the hotel prior to dinner.
    [Show full text]
  • Ship Shape As We Embark Upon a Project to Replace THV Patricia, We Take a Look at the Project Set-Up, Fact-Finding Missions and Progress So Far AUTUMN 2019 | ISSUE 31
    The Trinity House journal // Autumn 2019 // Issue 31 Ship shape As we embark upon a project to replace THV Patricia, we take a look at the project set-up, fact-finding missions and progress so far AUTUMN 2019 | ISSUE 31 9 10 1 Welcome from Deputy Master, Captain Ian McNaught 13 2-4 Six-month review 5 News in brief 6 Coming events 7-8 Appointments/obituaries 9 27 Staff profile 10-12 THV Patricia replacement 13-14 Royal Sovereign decommissioning 15 Lundy North modernisation 16-17 Portland Bill upgrade 18 38 Swansea Buoy Yard lift 19-21 World Marine AtoN Day 22-24 Investments on the way IALA and the inception of an IGO Welcome to another edition of Flash; our staff have been hard at work driving forward 25 a number of projects with a great deal of progress to show for it. Many thanks are due IALA AtoN Manager course to everyone who contributed news and features to the issue, as always. Multi-skilled project teams have been working on two significant projects: one to 26-31 procure a vessel to replace the 1982-built THV Patricia, and another to manage the Charity update safe removal of the now-deteriorating Royal Sovereign Lighthouse. Elsewhere it was great to see the twin successes of Maritime Safety Week and 32-35 World Marine Aids to Navigation Day—both on 1 July—as our maritime partners at Partner profile: UK the Department for Transport and IALA further commit themselves to raising the Hydrographic Office profile of the national and global maritime sector.
    [Show full text]
  • Weymouth to Portland Railway Walk Uneven Descent to Join the Disused Railway Line Below
    This footpath takes you down a steep, Weymouth to Portland Railway Walk uneven descent to join the disused railway line below. This unique landscape As walked on BBC TV’s ‘Railway Walks’ with Julia Bradbury altered by landslips and quarrying is rich in line along dotted fold archaeology and wildlife. Keep a look out This leaflet provides a brief description of the route and main features of for the herd of feral British Primitive goats interest. The whole length is very rich in heritage, geology and wildlife and this View from the Coast Path the Coast from View which have been reintroduced to help is just a flavour of what can be seen on the way. We hope you enjoy the walk control scrub. To avoid the steep path you can continue along the Coast Path at the and that it leads you to explore and find out more. top with excellent views of the weares, railway and Purbeck coast. The 6 mile (approx.) walk can be divided into three sections, each one taking in On reaching the railway line turn right as left will take you very different landscapes and parts of disused railways along the way. to a Portland Port fence with no access. Follow the route along past Durdle Pier, an 18th century stone shipping quay START WEYMOUTH 1 The Rodwell Trail and along the shores of with an old hand winch Derrick Crane. Passing impressive Portland Harbour cliffs you will eventually join the Coast Path down to 2 The Merchants’ railway from Castletown Church Ope Cove where you can return to the main road or to Yeates Incline continue south.
    [Show full text]
  • Evidence Report 2014
    (A Neighbourhood Plan for Portland, Dorset) Evidence Report April 2014 2 Portland Neighbourhood Plan Evidence Report Contents: Topic Sections: page: Introduction 3 Natural Environment & Built Environment 4 People & Housing 38 Business & Employment 60 Roads & Transport 90 Community & Social Facilities 102 Leisure & Recreation 118 Arts, Culture & Tourism 132 Appendix A 152 © Portland Town Council, 2014 Portland Neighbourhood Plan Evidence Report April 2014 3 Introduction Purpose Planning policy and proposals need to be based on a proper understanding of the place they relate to, if they are to be relevant, realistic and address local issues effectively. It is important that the Neighbourhood Plan is based on robust information and analysis of the local area; this is called the ‘evidence base’. Unless policy is based on firm evidence and proper community engagement, then it is more likely to reflect the assumptions and prejudices of those writing it than to reflect the needs of the wider area and community. We are advised that “the evidence base needs to be proportionate to the size of the neighbourhood area and scope and detail of the Neighbourhood Plan. Other factors such as the status of the current and emerging Local Plan policies will influence the depth and breadth of evidence needed. It is important to remember that the evidence base needs to reflect the fact that the plan being produced here will have statutory status and be used to decide planning applications in the neighbourhood area. It is necessary to develop a clear understanding of the neighbourhood area and policy issues covered; but not to review every piece of research and data in existence – careful selection is needed.”1 The evidence base for the Portland Neighbourhood plan comprises the many reports, documents and papers we have gathered (these are all listed in Appendix A, and are made available for reference via the Neighbourhood Plan website.
    [Show full text]
  • West Dorset, Weymouth & Portland Local Plan 2015 Policies Maps
    West Dorset, Weymouth & Portland Local Plan Policies Maps - Background Document 2015 Local Plan Policies Maps: background document West Dorset, Weymouth and Portland Local Plan Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 2 WEST DORSET DISTRICT COUNCIL LOCAL DESCRIPTIONS BY SETTLEMENT BEAMINSTER ................................................................................................................................... 3 BISHOP’S CAUNDLE ......................................................................................................................... 3 BRADFORD ABBAS .......................................................................................................................... 4 BRIDPORT and WEST BAY, ALLINGTON, BOTHENHAMPTON, BRADPOLE and WALDITCH ............ 4 BROADMAYNE and WEST KNIGHTON ............................................................................................ 4 BROADWINDSOR ............................................................................................................................ 5 BUCKLAND NEWTON ...................................................................................................................... 5 BURTON BRADSTOCK ..................................................................................................................... 5 CERNE ABBAS .................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]