DOCSLIB.ORG

Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Table 8: MA TMDL Re

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Table 8: MA TMDL Re Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Table 8: MA TMDL Reports with DCR Related Implementation Recommendations Watershed/TMDL Specific Waterbodies Pollutant of Does Does the TMDL If yes, what are the Is Agency meeting How is Agency currently meeting these Concern TMDL include BMP recommendations? these recommendations or how does Agency include a recommendations or recommendations plan to meet them in the future? WLA? performance through existing or requirement regarding proposed DCR (or former DEM/ programs? MDC)? Upper/Middle Charles Alder Brook Phosphorus Yes 1. Identify comprehensive River/Total Maximum Beaver Brook stormwater managmenet strategy Daily Load for Nutrients Charles River including cost estimates and in the Upper/Middle Cheese Cake Brook potential funding sources. Charles River, Factory Pond, Bogastow Brook 2. Develop and implement Massachusetts Franklin Reservoir NE, Miller Brook stormwater management programs Franklin Reservoir SE< Miller Brook including BMP implementation. 3. Illicit discharge detection and Fuller Brook elimination. Hardys Pond, Beaver Brook 4. Provide periodic status reports Houghton Pond, Bogastow Brook on implementation of remedial Lake Pearl, Eagle Brook activities. Lake Winthrop, Winthrop Canal 5. If necessary, identify future Linden Pond, Bogastow Brook programs to reduce phosphorus Lymans Pond, Unnamed Tributary loads in targeted seasons/locations. Milford Pond 6. Collect source monitoring data Mirror Lake, Stony Brook and additional drainage area Populatic Pond information to better target source Rock Meadow Brook areas for controls and evaluate the Rosemary Brook effectiveness of on-going control Sawmill Brook practices. South Meadow Brook 7. Enhance existing stormwater Trout Brook management programs to ptimize Stop River reductions in nutrient loadings with initial emphasis on source controls Uncas Pond, Uncas Brook and pollution prevention practices. 10/6/2014 1 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Table 8: MA TMDL Reports with DCR Related Implementation Recommendations Watershed/TMDL Specific Waterbodies Pollutant of Does Does the TMDL If yes, what are the Is Agency meeting How is Agency currently meeting these Concern TMDL include BMP recommendations? these recommendations or how does Agency include a recommendations or recommendations plan to meet them in the future? WLA? performance through existing or requirement regarding proposed DCR (or former DEM/ programs? MDC)? TauntonUpper/Middle River/Final Charles Assonet River Bacteria Yes No --1. Identify comprehensive -- -- PathogenRiver/Total TMDL Maximum for the stormwater managmenet strategy TauntonDaily Load River for WatershedNutrients including cost estimates and in the Upper/Middle potential funding sources. Charles River, Beaver Brook 2. Develop and implement Massachusetts Broad Cove stormwater management programs Matfield River including BMP implementation. Meadow Brook 3. Illicit discharge detection and Muddy Cove Brook elimination. 4. Provide periodic status reports Rumford River on implementation of remedial Salisbury Brook activities. Salisbury Plain River 5. If necessary, identify future Segreganset River programs to reduce phosphorus Shumatuscacant River loads in targeted seasons/locations. Taunton River 6. Collect source monitoring data Threemile River and additional drainage area Trout Brook information to better target source Wading River areas for controls and evaluate the Nashua River/ Final Bare Hill Pond Phosphorus Yes Yes 1.effectiveness The MA DEP of on-going will endorse control in- Yes Refer to BMP 2-8. TMDL for Bare Hill Pond lakepractices. remediation efforts that meet (Nuisance all7. environmentalEnhance existing concerns, stormwater Aquatics) however,management instituting programs such to measuresptimize willreductions rest with in nutrientcommunities loadings and withthe Cleaninitial Lakesemphasis Program on source now controls administeredand pollution byprevention EPA and, practices. in Massachusetts, the DEM. 2. DEM forester should check that Yes Refer to BMP 7-4 an approved forest cutting plan is in place and BMP's for erosion are being followed. 10/6/2014 2 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Table 8: MA TMDL Reports with DCR Related Implementation Recommendations Watershed/TMDL Specific Waterbodies Pollutant of Does Does the TMDL If yes, what are the Is Agency meeting How is Agency currently meeting these Concern TMDL include BMP recommendations? these recommendations or how does Agency include a recommendations or recommendations plan to meet them in the future? WLA? performance through existing or requirement regarding proposed DCR (or former DEM/ programs? MDC)? ChicopeeUpper/Middle River/ Charles Final Browning Pond, Oakham Phosphorus Yes Yes 1. IdentifyThe MA comprehensive DEP will endorse in- Yes Refer to BMP 2-8. PhosphorusRiver/Total MaximumTMDL for Long Pond, Springfield lakestormwater remediation managmenet efforts that strategy meet Yes Refer to BMP 7-4 Daily Load for Nutrients including cost estimates and Selected Chicopee Basin Sugden Reservoir, Spencer all environmental concerns, in the Upper/Middle potential funding sources. Lakes Mona Lake, Springfield however, instituting such measures Charles River, will2. Develop rest with and communitites implement and the Minechoag Pond, Ludlow Massachusetts Cleanstormwater Lakes management Program now programs Spectacle Pond, Wilbraham administeredincluding BMP by implementation.EPA and, in Wickaboag Pond, Brookfield Massachusetts,3. Illicit discharge the detectionDEM. and elimination. 2.4. DEMProvide forester periodic should status check reports that anon approvedimplementation forest cuttingof remedial plan is in placeactivities. and BMP's for erosion are being5. If necessary, followed. identify future Cape Cod/Final TMDL Frost Fish Creek Bacteria Yes No --programs to reduce phosphorus -- Report of Bacteria for loads in targeted seasons/locations. Frost Fish Creek, 6. Collect source monitoring data Chatham and additional drainage area -- information to better target source areas for controls and evaluate the effectiveness of on-going control practices. 7. Enhance existing stormwater management programs to ptimize reductions in nutrient loadings with initial emphasis on source controls and pollution prevention practices. 10/6/2014 3 Department of Conservation and Recreation NPDES Storm Water Management Program Permit Year 11 Annual Report Table 8: MA TMDL Reports with DCR Related Implementation Recommendations Watershed/TMDL Specific Waterbodies Pollutant of Does Does the TMDL If yes, what are the Is Agency meeting How is Agency currently meeting these Concern TMDL include BMP recommendations? these recommendations or how does Agency include a recommendations or recommendations plan to meet them in the future? WLA? performance through existing or requirement regarding proposed DCR (or former DEM/ programs? MDC)? CapeUpper/Middle Cod/Final Charles TMDL Muddy Creek Bacteria Yes No --1. Identify comprehensive -- ReportRiver/Total of Bacteria Maximum for stormwater managmenet strategy MuddyDaily Load Creek, for ChathamNutrients including cost estimates and in the Upper/Middle potential funding sources. -- CapeCharles Cod/Final River, Nitrogen Oyster Pond Total Nitrogen Yes No --2. Develop and implement -- TMDLMassachusetts for Oyster Pond stormwater management programs including BMP implementation. -- Cape Cod/Final Nitrogen Little Pond Embayment System Total Nitrogen Yes No --3. Illicit discharge detection and -- TMDL for Little Pond elimination. 4. Provide periodic status reports -- Connecticut Basin/ Final Aldrich Lake East, Granby Phosphorus Yes Yes 1.on implementationThe MA DEP will of endorseremedial in- Yes Refer to BMP 2-8. TMDLs of Phosphorus Aldrich Lake West, Granby lakeactivities. remediation efforts that meet for Selected Connecticut Leverett Pond, Leverett all5. environmentalIf necessary, identify concerns, future Basin Lakes Lake Wyola, Shutesbury however,programs institutingto reduce phosphorussuch measures loads in targeted seasons/locations. Loon Pond, Springfield will rest with communities and the 6. Collect source monitoring data Lake Warner, Hadley Clean Lakes Program now administeredand additional by drainage EPA and, area in Massachusetts,information to better the DEM. target source areas for controls and evaluate the 2.effectiveness DEM forester of on-going should check control that Yes Refer to BMP 7-4 anpractices. approved forest cutting plan is in place7. Enhance and BMPs existing for erosionstormwater are beingmanagement followed. programs Also, DEM to ptimize should providereductions training in nutrient to local loadings with ConCommsinitial emphasis on harvesting on source controlsBMPs. and pollution prevention practices. French River/ Final Buffumville Lake, Charlton Phosphorus Yes Yes 1. The MA DEP will endorse in- Yes Refer to BMP 2-8. TMDLs of Phosphorus Cedar Meadow Pd, Leicester lake remediation efforts that meet for Selected French Basin Dresser Hill Pond, Charlton all environmental concerns, Lakes Dutton Pond, Leicester however, instituting such measures Gore Pond, Charlton/Dudley will rest with communities and the Granite Reservoir, Charlton Clean lakes Program now Greenville Pond, Leicester administered by EPA and, in Massachusetts, the DEM. Hudson Pond, Oxford Jones Pond, Charlton/Spencer
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Plymouth County, Massachusetts (All Jurisdictions)
    VOLUME 3 OF 5 PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER COMMUNITY NAME NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 PRELIMINARY: APRIL 18, 2018 FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV003D Version Number 2.3.3.5 TABLE OF CONTENTS Volume 1 Page SECTION 1.0 – INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 The National Flood Insurance Program 1 1.2 Purpose of this Flood Insurance Study Report 2 1.3 Jurisdictions Included in the Flood Insurance Study Project 2 1.4 Considerations for using this Flood Insurance Study Report 5 SECTION 2.0 – FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT APPLICATIONS 17 2.1 Floodplain Boundaries 17 2.2 Floodways 34 2.3 Base Flood Elevations 35 2.4 Non-Encroachment Zones 35 2.5 Coastal Flood Hazard Areas 35 2.5.1 Water Elevations and the Effects of Waves 35 2.5.2 Floodplain Boundaries and BFEs for Coastal Areas 37 2.5.3 Coastal High Hazard Areas 38 2.5.4 Limit of Moderate Wave Action 39 SECTION 3.0
    [Show full text]
  • Town of Marion, Massachusetts 2016 Annual Report
    ! ! "#$%!#&!'()*#%+!'(,,(-./,011,! ! ! ! ! 2345! 6%%/(7!809#)1! ! Town of Marion Municipal Telephone Directory Emergency Numbers Ambulance - 748-1212 911 - Emergency Only Fire Dept. - 748-1177 Police Dept. - 748-1212 911 - Emergency Only 911 - Emergency Only Office of Emergency Management - 748-1212 911- Emergency Only Town House - 748-3500 Two Spring Street Board of Appeals – 748-3560 Harbormaster office – 748-3515 Board of Assessors – 748-3518 Planning Board – 748-3517 Board of Health – 748-3530 Recreation Department – 774-217-8355 Board of Selectmen -748-3520 Registrars of Voters – 748-3526 Building Department – 748-3516 Town Accountant – 748-3523 Conservation Commission – 748-3560 Town Administrator – 748-3520 Council on Aging – 748-357 0 Town Clerk – 748-3502 Facilities Manager – 748-3089 Town Planner – 748-3513 Fire Inspections – 748-3510 Treasurer/Collector – 748-3505 Veteran’s Services – 758-4100, Ext. 212 Department of Public Works - 50 Benson Brook Road - 748-3540 Elizabeth Taber Library - 748-1252 Harbormaster/Shellfish Officer - 748-3535 Superintendent of Schools - 758-2772 Sippican School - 748-0100 Old Rochester Regional Junior High School - 758-4928 Old Rochester Regional High School - 758-3745 Front cover photo by Michelle Smith One Hundred Sixty Second Annual Report of the Town Officers of Marion For the Year Ending December 31st 2016 —Table of Contents— In Memoriam . 4 Elected Town Officials. 6 Appointed Town Officials & Staff . 7 General Government Reports Board of Selectmen/Water & Sewer Commissioners . 16 Board of Assessors . 18 Planning Board . 20 Department of Public Works. 22 Water Committee . 26 Building Commissioner . 28 Zoning Board of Appeals . 30 Facilities Manager . 31 Town House Building Committee .
    [Show full text]
  • Fiscal Year 2021 Semi-Annual Personal Property Commitment (PDF)
    Tax Rate/$1000 $4.62 Fiscal Year 2022 Semi-Annual Personal Property Commitment Owner and Parcel Information Class Assessed Taxable Assessments 102377 9J-7B-LP27 501 13,600 13,600 H1 Tax $31.42 DEVRIES CHRISTINE 70 A LEONARD WAY 13,600 13,600 H2 Tax $31.41 70 A LEONARD WAY CHATHAM, MA 02633 Tax $62.83 101967 9J-6A-LP29 501 20,520 20,520 H1 Tax $47.40 LITTLEJOHN JAMES R & 96 A LEONARD WAY 20,520 20,520 H2 Tax $47.40 JANA J 7343 LANE PARK CT Tax $94.80 DALLAS, TX 75225 101957 12E-23E-A13 501 19,730 19,730 H1 Tax $45.58 PHELAN CYNTHIA S & 106 ABSEGAMI RUN 19,730 19,730 H2 Tax $45.57 DAVID C 242 BEACON ST 5 Tax $91.15 BOSTON, MA 02116-1219 102573 12E-23C-A11 501 17,710 17,710 H1 Tax $40.91 MORRIS MARK & 124 ABSEGAMI RUN 17,710 17,710 H2 Tax $40.91 MARLENE 13 MINUTEMAN WAY Tax $81.82 CANTON, MA 02021 775 12E-23A-A9 501 25,180 25,180 H1 Tax $58.17 138 ABSEGAMI RUN 138 ABSEGAMI RUN 25,180 25,180 H2 Tax $58.16 REALTY TRUST PEDERSEN BARBARA L Tax $116.33 TRUSTEE 138 ABSEGAMI RUN CHATHAM, MA 02633 102076 12E-23-A20 501 81,150 81,150 H1 Tax $187.46 ABSEGAMI RUN LLC 141 ABSEGAMI RUN 81,150 81,150 H2 Tax $187.45 MGRS TUTRONE II ANTHONY & TUTRONE Tax $374.91 AMY 212 5TH AVE NEW YORK, NY 10010- 2180 102855 14I-50-W58 501 14,630 14,630 H1 Tax $33.80 FAY ANDREW T & 63 ANDREW MITCHELL 14,630 14,630 H2 Tax $33.79 RACHEL E LN 400 WICKHAM LN Tax $67.59 SOUTHLAKE, TX 76092 Wednesday, September 22, 2021 Page 1 of 193 Owner and Parcel Information Class Assessed Taxable Assessments 102666 9K-53-G4 501 21,150 21,150 H1 Tax $48.86 GUIDOBONI PAUL R & 60 ARBUTUS TRL
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts on Phosphorus Loads in the Upper and Middle Charles River Watershed with HSPF Modeling
    University of Massachusetts Boston ScholarWorks at UMass Boston Graduate Masters Theses Doctoral Dissertations and Masters Theses 12-2019 Climate Change Impacts on Phosphorus Loads in the Upper and Middle Charles River Watershed with HSPF Modeling Meagan Riley Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umb.edu/masters_theses Part of the Environmental Sciences Commons CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOADS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED WITH HSPF MODELING A Thesis Presented by MEAGAN RILEY Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies, University of Massachusetts Boston, in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE December 2019 Environmental Sciences Program © 2019 by Meagan Riley All rights reserved CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOADS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED WITH HSPF MODELING A Thesis Presented by MEAGAN RILEY Approved as to style and content by: ________________________________________________ Ellen Douglas, Professor Chairperson of Committee ________________________________________________ Crystal Schaaf, Professor Member ________________________________________________ Julie Dyer Wood, Deputy Director Charles River Watershed Association Member _______________________________________ Juanita Urban-Rich, Program Director Environmental Sciences Program _______________________________________ Robert Chen, Interim Dean School for the Environment ABSTRACT CLIMATE CHANGE IMPACTS ON PHOSPHORUS LOADS IN THE UPPER AND MIDDLE CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED WITH HSPF MODELING December 2019 Meagan Riley, B.A., University of Massachusetts Boston M.S., University of Massachusetts Boston Directed by Professor Ellen Douglas Water quality in the Upper and Middle Charles River Watershed has improved over the past several decades primarily due to improvements statewide in wastewater management. However, climate change threatens this progress, with future projections promising increased precipitation and temperatures for the New England region.
    [Show full text]
  • Total Maximum Daily Load for Nutrients in the Upper/Middle Charles River, Massachusetts
    Draft Total Maximum Daily Load for Nutrients in the Upper/Middle Charles River, Massachusetts Control Number: CN 272.0 Prepared by: Charles River Watershed Association 190 Park Rd, Weston, MA 02453 Numeric Environmental Services, Inc. Beverly Farms, MA 01915 Prepared for: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection 627 Main Street, Worcester, MA 01608 United States Environmental Protection Agency, New England Region 1 Congress Street, Boston, MA 02114-2023 September 2009 Notice of Availability Limited copies of this report are available at no cost by written request to: Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management 627 Main Street, 2nd Floor, Worcester, MA 01608 Please request Report Number: MA-CN 272.0 This report is also available from MassDEP’s home page at: http://www.mass.gov/dep/water/resources/tmdls.htm A complete list of reports published since 1963 is updated annually and printed in July. The report, titled, “Publications of the Massachusetts Division of Watershed Management – Watershed Planning Program, 1963-(current year)”, is also available by writing to the DWM in Worcester and on the MassDEP Web site identified above. DISCLAIMER References to trade names, commercial products, manufacturers, or distributors in this report constitute neither endorsements nor recommendations by the Division of Watershed Management for use. Front Cover: Left=Canoe on free-flowing reach of Middle Charles Right=South Natick Dam showing excessive algae growth ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary
    [Show full text]
  • History and Directory of Wrentham and Norfolk, Mass. for 1890. Containing
    HISTORY AND DIRECTORY -Oi^ ffRENTHAM and NOKFOLK, MASS. FOR- ISQO, Containing a Complete Resident, Street and Business Directory, Town Officers, Schools, Societies Churches, Post Offices, Etc., Etc. HISTORY er The TevNS. FROM THE FIRST SETTLEMENT TO THE PRESENT TIME, BY SAMUEL. WARNER. Compiled and Published by A. E. FOSS 6- CO., Needham. BOSTON PRESS OF BROWN BROS., 43, LINCOLN STREET. I S90. ADVEKTFSEMENTS. LHKE PEHRIj. One of the most beaiitirul inlaiul summer resorts in New liuglaiidj situated about midway between IJoston and Providence on the new branch of the Old Colony Railroad. Spacious grove, charming lake, exquisite scenery, natural amphitheatre, hall, restaurant, bicycle track, good stable, steam launch, ample accomodations. OPEN DAILY TH€ YGHR ROUND. ^-LIBERAL TERMS MADE TO SOCIETIES. -#- Lake Pearl Bakery, ( Permanently Situated on the Grounds, ) turns out First-Class Goods at the very Lowest Prices. K>0:r)cy ^peecd, fe^ai^e c-sfpj, rakeps c. THE TEAM RUNS TO THE SURROUNDING TOWNS AND VILLAGES. Baked Beans and Brown Bread. W M. L. ENEG REN, JR., - PROPR IETOR. Jja.S. J%.. C3rXJIlL.i>7 -DEALER, IlSr- CHOICE GROCERIES, TEAS, COFREES AND SPICES A SPECIALTY. BOOTS, SHOES MD RUBBERS. All Goods kept iu a First-Class Country Store. Orders taken and (iootls Promptly Delivered. - E. B. Guild, Salesman. * In AVrentham TImrsday and F'riday of each week. oiT-Y" INFILLS, - - :m:j^ss. ADVERTISEMENTS. ERNEST C. MORSE, periodicals, stationery, Confectionery, Cigars and Tobacco, TeiLiKin QseDS. sejsits' PURfiigHiNSS. All kiiiicis of Temperance Drinks. Correspondent and Agent for the Wrentham Sentinel. J. G. BARDEN. E. M. BLAKE. J T.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Memorandum Charles River Watershed 2002 Fish
    Technical Memorandum Charles River Watershed 2002 Fish Population Monitoring and Assessment Robert J. Maietta Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Division of Watershed Management Worcester, MA October 2006 CN 077.3 Charles River Watershed 2002-2006 Water Quality Assessment Report Appendix G G1 72wqar07.doc DWM CN 136.5 Introduction Fish population surveys were conducted using techniques similar to Rapid Bioassessment Protocol V as described originally by Plafkin et al. (1989) and later by Barbour et al. (1999). Standard Operating Procedures are described in MassDEP Method CN 075.1 Fish Population SOP. Surveys also included a habitat assessment component modified from that described in the aforementioned document (Barbour et al. 1999). Fish populations in the Charles River watershed were sampled by electrofishing during the late summer of 2002 using a Smith Root Model 12 battery powered backpack electrofisher. A reach of between 80m and 100m was sampled by passing a pole- mounted anode ring, side to side through the stream channel and in and around likely fish holding cover. All fish shocked were netted and held in buckets. Sampling proceeded from an obstruction or constriction upstream to an endpoint at another obstruction or constriction, such as a waterfall or shallow riffle. Following completion of a sampling run, all fish were identified to species, measured, and released. Results of the fish population surveys can be found in Table 1. It should be noted that young-of-the-year (yoy) fish from most species, with the exception of salmonids, are not targeted for collection. Young-of-the-year fishes that are collected, either on purpose or inadvertently, are noted in Table 1.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Height Above Nearest Drainage (Hand) Flood Mapping Methodology with the Implementation of Multivariant Linear Regression Algorithm
    AN EVALUATION OF THE HEIGHT ABOVE NEAREST DRAINAGE (HAND) FLOOD MAPPING METHODOLOGY WITH THE IMPLEMENTATION OF MULTIVARIANT LINEAR REGRESSION ALGORITHM A Thesis Presented By Said Lababidi to The Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in the field of Civil and Environmental Engineering Northeastern University Boston, Massachusetts May 2021 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................ v 2. INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 1 3. METHODS .................................................................................................................. 4 3.1 Study Region and Rivers ..................................................................................... 4 3.2 The Height Above Nearest Drainage Methodology ............................................ 5 3.3 Application and Tools ......................................................................................... 8 3.4 Implementation of Multivariant Linear Regression Algorithm ........................ 10 3.5 Trial Definitions ................................................................................................ 12 3.6 Performance Metrics ......................................................................................... 12 4. RESULTS/DISCUSSION ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4
    PLYMOUTH COUNTY, MASSACHUSETTS (ALL JURISDICTIONS) Volume 1 of 4 COMMUNITY NAME COMMUNITY NUMBER ABINGTON, TOWN OF 250259 BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250260 BROCKTON, CITY OF 250261 CARVER, TOWN OF 250262 DUXBURY, TOWN OF 250263 EAST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250264 HALIFAX, TOWN OF 250265 HANOVER, TOWN OF 250266 HANSON, TOWN OF 250267 HINGHAM, TOWN OF 250268 HULL, TOWN OF 250269 KINGSTON, TOWN OF 250270 LAKEVILLE, TOWN OF 250271 MARION, TOWN OF 255213 MARSHFIELD, TOWN OF 250273 MATTAPOISETT, TOWN OF 255214 MIDDLEBOROUGH, TOWN OF 250275 NORWELL, TOWN OF 250276 PEMBROKE, TOWN OF 250277 PLYMOUTH, TOWN OF 250278 PLYMPTON, TOWN OF 250279 ROCHESTER, TOWN OF 250280 ROCKLAND, TOWN OF 250281 SCITUATE, TOWN OF 250282 WAREHAM, TOWN OF 255223 WEST BRIDGEWATER, TOWN OF 250284 WHITMAN, TOWN OF 250285 REVISED NOVEMBER 4, 2016 Federal Emergency Management Agency FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY NUMBER 25023CV001C NOTICE TO FLOOD INSURANCE STUDY USERS Communities participating in the National Flood Insurance Program have established repositories of flood hazard data for floodplain management and flood insurance purposes. This Flood Insurance Study (FIS) may not contain all data available within the repository. It is advisable to contact the community repository for any additional data. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) may revise and republish part or all of this Preliminary FIS report at any time. In addition, FEMA may revise part of this FIS report by the Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) process, which does not involve republication or redistribution of the FIS
    [Show full text]
  • Find It and Fix It Stormwater Program in the Charles and Mystic River Watersheds
    FIND IT AND FIX IT STORMWATER PROGRAM IN THE CHARLES AND MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHEDS FINAL REPORT JUNE 2005 - AUGUST 2008 October 29, 2008 SUBMITTED TO: MASSACHUSETTS ENVIRONMENTAL TRUST EXECUTIVE OFFICE OF ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL AFFAIRS OFFICE OF GRANTS AND TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE 100 CAMBRIDGE STREET, 9TH FLOOR BOSTON, MA 02114 SUBMITTED BY: CHARLES RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION MYSTIC RIVER WATERSHED ASSOCIATION 190 PARK ROAD 20 ACADEMY STREET, SUITE 203 WESTON, MA 02493 ARLINGTON, MA 02476 Table of Contents List of Figures................................................................................................................................. 3 List of Tables .................................................................................................................................. 5 Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 6 Organization of Report ................................................................................................................... 8 1.0 PROGRAM BACKGROUND............................................................................................ 9 1.1 Charles River.................................................................................................................. 9 1.1.1 Program Study Area................................................................................................ 9 1.1.2 Water Quality Issues............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Spring 2021 E-News
    5/30/2021 Gmail - Deerfield River News Jim Perry <[email protected]> Deerfield River News 1 message Deerfield River Watershed Association <[email protected]> Wed, May 26, 2021 at 3:44 PM To: [email protected] May, 2021 NEW website: www.deerfieldriver.org email: [email protected] Stemming the Decline of River Access The Deerfield River Watershed Association (DRWA) has been very active in our work to protect your right of access to the Deerfield River and its tributaries. Zoar Picnic Area & River Launch If you have been out on the Deerfield or Green Rivers, you have noticed popular public access parking areas closed or severely restricted and increased levels of policing of the river launch points, parking areas, and access roads. Soon there will be towing of parking violators in the new “No Parking” areas within the Town of Charlemont. This is all in response to increasing river use and the resulting safety issues created by a subset of river users and human pressure felt by some in the local communities. The DRWA has been pushing very hard to reverse this trend of limiting river access. We are working with many others to develop short- and https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0?ik=f6b21214f4&view=pt&search=all&permthid=thread-f%3A1700851342828504746%7Cmsg-f%3A17008513428… 1/4 5/30/2021 Gmail - Deerfield River News long-term solutions that will help meet local community needs, while providing you with continued access to the rivers you love. We are hopeful that by July, port-a-potties will be installed at Shunpike Rest Area for the first time in years and increased at Zoar Picnic Area; day- use parking will be restored to Shunpike; and a search for longer term solutions, including a River Recreation Plan, will begin.
    [Show full text]
  • MIDDLEBOROUGH MASTER PLAN Report on Findings and Alternatives
    MIDDLEBOROUGH MASTER PLAN Report on Findings and Alternatives Prepared for the Town of Middleborough Prepared by The Cecil Group, Inc. with Bonz/REA The BSC Group March 23, 2001 - Revised February 11, 2002 MIDDLEBOROUGH MASTER PLAN Report on Findings and Alternatives March 23, 2001 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 A. Purpose of the Findings and Alternatives Report .................................................... 1 B. Vision Statement ........................................................................................................ 2 C. Summary of the Master Planning Process ............................................................... 3 D. A Guide to the Use of this Report ............................................................................. 3 II. FINDINGS AND ALTERNATIVES............................................................................. 5 A. Land Use .................................................................................................................... 5 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 5 2. Goals and Objectives for Land Use ........................................................................ 6 3. Key Findings ........................................................................................................... 7 5. Land Use Alternatives ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]