The Best Interests of the Child – a Dialogue Between Theory and Practice Council of Europe the Best Interests of the Child – a Dialogue Between Theory and Practice

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

The Best Interests of the Child – a Dialogue Between Theory and Practice Council of Europe the Best Interests of the Child – a Dialogue Between Theory and Practice The best interests The best interests of the child – A dialogue between theory of the child – A dialogue between and practice best interests The of the child – A dialogue between theory and practice Council of Europe of Europe Council The best interests of the child – A dialogue between theory and practice Council of Europe The opinions expressed in this work are the responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official policy of the Council of Europe. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated, reproduced or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic (CD-Rom, Internet, etc.) or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or any information storage or retrieval system, without prior permission in writing from the Directorate of Communication (F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex or [email protected]). Cover and layout: Document and Publications Production Department (SPDP), Council of Europe Cover Photo: Shutterstock Council of Europe Publishing F-67075 Strasbourg Cedex http://book.coe.int Edited by Milka Sormunen © Council of Europe, March 2016 Printed at the Council of Europe Contents INTRODUCTION 5 CHAPTER 1 – THE CONCEPT OF THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD: GENERAL REFLECTIONS 9 Presentation of General Comment No. 14: strengths and limitations, points of consensus and dissent emerging in its drafting – Jorge Cardona Llorens 11 The concept of the best interests of the child: what does it add to children’s human rights? – Nigel Cantwell 18 Interpreting and applying the best interests of the child: the main challenges – Olga Khazova 27 Best interests of the child and the right to be heard – Gerison Lansdown 31 Alpha ursae minoris – The North Star and the child’s best interests among competing interests – Jacques Fierens 36 Children’s best interests: a discussion of commonly encountered tensions – Eveline van Hooijdonk 40 CHAPTER 2 – ASSESSING, DETERMINING AND MONITORING BEST INTERESTS 45 Determining marginalised children’s best interests through meaningful participation – Urszula Markowska-Manista 47 How to assess and determine the best interests of the child from a perspective of child development and child-rearing – Margrite Kalverboer 59 The best interests of the child assessment with recently arrived refugee children – Carla van Os 70 Monitoring best-interests decisions – Can systems developed for monitoring return decisions serve as an inspiration for other domains? – Hanne Op de Beeck 74 CHAPTER 3 – BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN DIFFERENT ENVIRONMENTS 79 The concept of the child’s best interests in the work of the Council of Europe – Regína Jensdóttir 81 The concept of the best interests of the child in the work of the European Union – Margaret Tuite 86 The concept of the best interests of the child from the perspective of a practitioner – Tam Baillie 90 What is the input by children and young people in implementing their best interests? – Johanna Nyman 93 Ethical pointers and framework for taking decisions in a child’s best interests – The perspective of a children’s ombudsman – Bernard De Vos 96 The best interests of the child and current challenges civil society faces – Jana Hainsworth 100 CHAPTER 4 – BEST INTERESTS OF THE CHILD IN FAMILY AFFAIRS 103 Jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights on the best interests of the child in family affairs – Aida Grgić 105 How can we ensure that the best interests of the child are a primary consideration in social work? – Cristina Martins 117 The best interests of the child in removal decisions – A parliamentary perspective – Valeriu Ghileţchi 121 Children’s perspectives concerning imprisonment: setting up a self-expression group of children with imprisoned parents or other relatives – Astrid Hirschelmann 125 The child’s best interests and the right to know his or her origins – Géraldine Mathieu 130 Concluding remarks 134 APPENDICES 137 Appendix I – Speeches presented at the European Conference on the Best interests of the child – A dialogue between theory and practice (Brussels, 9-10 December 2014) 139 Speech by Koen Geens, Minister of Justice, Belgium 139 Speech by Sven Gatz, Flemish Minister for Culture, Media, Youth and Brussels Affairs, Belgium 141 Speech by Rudy Demotte, Minister-President of the Wallonia-Brussels Federation Government in charge of Children’s Rights, Belgium 143 Speech by Torbjørn Frøysnes, Ambassador, Head of the Council of Europe Liaison Office to the European Union 145 Appendix II – Conclusions of the European Conference on the Best Interests of the Child within the framework of the 25th anniversary of the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (Brussels, 9-10 December 2014) 149 Appendix III – Executive summaries of the contributions 154 Introduction Everyone has heard about it, but we do not actually know what it means – or do we? The concept of the best interests of the child is essential, yet vague and indetermi- nate. It has existed for a long time, but its importance grew when it was included in the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC).1 Article 3.1 of the UNCRC states that: [i]n all actions concerning children, whether undertaken by public or private social welfare institutions, courts of law, administrative authorities or legislative bodies, the best interests of the child shall be a primary consideration. What does this mean in practice? How should the concept be interpreted and applied? The Belgian authorities and the Council of Europe wished to emphasise the role of the best interests of the child and further develop the normative provisions concerning this concept, specifically the deontological, ethical and procedural rules related to it. The European Conference on the Best Interests of the Child, “a dialogue between theory and practice”, was thus organised within the framework of the Belgian Chairmanship of the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe in collaboration with the Council of Europe Children’s Rights Division in Brussels on 9 and 10 December 2014, linking the 25th anniversary of the UNCRC with the Human Rights Day. The conference was one of the priorities set by the Belgian Chairmanship under the topic “Promotion and realisation of human rights”. The aim of the conference was to shed light on a vague, indeterminate, yet very central concept whose importance for children’s rights is unquestionable. By organising the conference, we wanted to initiate and encourage discussion in order to spread knowledge and enhance understanding of the concept of the child’s best interests. Clarifying the concept of the best interests of the child and its implementation in practice is important for children’s human rights in general. One of the main chal- lenges related to the best interests of the child is to mobilise decision makers around the concept so that it is genuinely seen as a primary consideration in their daily work. Judges, medical professionals, psychosocial workers, psychologists, educators and other professionals who work with children and youth must have the necessary tools at their disposal to assess and determine the child’s interests. They must also 1. The UN Convention on the Rights of the Child was adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by General Assembly Resolution 44/25 of 20 November 1989. It entered into force 2 September 1990, in accordance with Article 49. ► Page 5 understand the concept of the child’s best interests in order to make good decisions that respect their human rights. The conference explored the challenges decision makers face when working to implement the best interests of the child. The target group of the conference included experts, policy makers and practitioners involved in decisions that have an impact on children’s lives, as well as representatives of the major European institutions and non-governmental organisations protecting the rights of the child. Each member state of the Council of Europe was invited to send a delegation of two participants to the conference. For Belgium, as well as for the Council of Europe, it was essential that all partners, experts, decision makers and practitioners, but also children, had the chance to express their views and contribute to the discussion. Organising the conference was a way to bring together a diverse range of actors and combine theory and practice in an effective way. This publication reflects the main ideas discussed in the conference and sheds light on different aspects of the concept of the best interests of the child. In so doing, it presents 21 texts that all offer their own viewpoint on the concept. Together, these texts provide a comprehensive view of the best interests of the child, wherein the different dimensions of the concept are articulated. This publication is structured into four chapters discussing the best interest of the child from different points of view. The first chapter introduces general reflections on the best interests of the child that will help in understanding the regulatory framework surrounding the concept and its application. Jorge Cardona Llorens, member of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, discusses the strengths and limitations of the committee’s General Comment No. 14 on the right of the child to have his or her best interests taken as a primary consideration. Nigel Cantwell offers a critical point of view and discusses whether the concept offers added value to children’s human rights. Olga Khazova, also a member of the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child, discusses questions related to the legal framework where the concept applies. Gerison Lansdown anal- yses the connection between the best interests of the child and participation, and Jacques Fierens introduces an idea of the best interests of the child as a guiding light, rather like the North Star. A study by the Children’s Rights Knowledge Centre (KeKi) on children’s best interests is also presented by Eveline van Hooijdonk.
Recommended publications
  • Adolescent Empowerment and Engagement for Health
    KNOWLEDGE SUMMARY: 2020 WOMEN’S, CHILDREN’S AND ADOLESCENTS’ HEALTH 37 ADOLESCENT EMPOWERMENT AND ENGAGEMENT FOR HEALTH AND WELL-BEING: strengthening capacities, opportunities and rights Photo: Flickr Creative Commons Brown License/UN Women/Ryan Flickr Photo: The world’s 1.2 billion adolescents (aged 10–19 years) have a fundamental right to engage meaningfully in all matters that affect their lives (Box 1) (1, 2). This includes the right to engage in decision-making as equal and valuable partners, while being supported in their roles as adolescent leaders and advocates (3). When adolescents participate in decision-making, the resulting policies and programmes are more likely to respond to their diverse needs (4). Such engagement requires the empowerment of adolescents, by increasing their capacities, skills, autonomy and decision- making power, and by advancing their rights (5–7). Box 1. Definition of meaningful adolescent engagement (1) Meaningful adolescent engagement is defined as an inclusive, intentional and mutually respectful partnership between adolescents and adults, whereby power is shared, respective contributions are valued, and young people’s ideas, perspectives, skills and strengths are integrated into the design and delivery of programmes, strategies, policies and funding mechanisms that affect their lives, communities and countries, and the wider world. Hosted by the World Health Organization What do we know about engaging adolescents Box 2. Engaging adolescents to to improve health and well-being? improve HIV service delivery In recent years there has been an important shift away from Zvandiri is a multicomponent service viewing adolescents solely as passive beneficiaries of services, delivery programme for children and and towards considering them as powerful agents of change.
    [Show full text]
  • Šolsko Polje, XXXI, 2020, 3-4: Convention on the Rights of the Child
    Convention on the Rights of the Child and Adultism: How to Deconstruct a Myth? Jelena Vranješević, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Belgrade he image of the child in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) (1989) is represented by three “Ps”: protection, provision and Tparticipation (Lansdown, 2005). According to the CRC, states are obliged to protect children from all forms of discrimination and physical or mental violence: injury or abuse, neglect or negligent treatment, mal- treatment or exploitation; economic exploitation or any work that may in- terfere with their education or is harmful to their health or physical, men- tal, spiritual, moral or social development; illicit use of narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances; all forms of exploitation that are harmful to any aspect of their welfare such as the abduction, sale of or traffic of children and all forms of sexual exploitation and abuse. At the same time, having in mind their vulnerability, the obligation of a state (adults) is to provide/ ensure children’s survival and development: adequate family accommo- dation, health and social protection, adequate standard of living, com- pulsory and free primary education and options for secondary schooling; provision of appropriate and equal opportunities for cultural, artistic, rec- reational and leisure activity; the right to a name, family identity and citi- zenship, as well as legal and other assistance for defence purposes. Protection and provision narratives are in harmony with the domi- nant image of the child as sensitive and vulnerable, in need of being pro- tected from various sources of endangerment; also, the child who should be provided with all things necessary for survival and development.
    [Show full text]
  • A Handbook on Child Participation in Parliament a H a Ndbook on C H Ndbook Ild P a Rti C I Pa Tion in P a Rli a Ment
    18 - 18 2011 o. N in Parliament in HANDBOOK FOR PARLIAMENTARIANS ARLIAMENTARY UNION INTER-P UNION INTERPARLEMENTAIRE A Handbook on Child Participation Participation Child on A Handbook UNICEF A HAndbook on CHild PArtiCipation in PArliAment IPU A HAndbook on CHild PArtiCipation in PArliAment A Handbook on Child Participation in Parliament Foreword his handbook, a collaborative effort of the Inter-Parliamentary Union and TUNICEF(United Nations Children’s Fund), addresses some of the key ways in which parliamentarians can guarantee that children’s voices, concerns and interests find expression in and enjoy meaningful attention from parliaments. Children are entitled to be involved in the wide range of issues that affect them, and as they grow and develop their opportunities for participation should expand from private to public spaces, from local to global influence. However, while some children are beginning to actively exercise their rights and become agents of change, the voices of many of the world’s young citizens remain unheard, their interests forgotten or ignored. As the principal representatives of their constituents, including children, parliamentarians are uniquely placed to give the views of children – especially those who are the most deprived and most vulnerable – a platform in their work. By inviting children to testify in committees, consulting children in their communities or bringing children’s perspectives to bear on the budget process, parliamentarians can ensure that children’s opinions have an impact on the direction of policies, the implementation of laws and the design of budgets. Listening to children and allowing them to contribute to decision-making processes can lead to better decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Rights of the Child for Young Children
    UNITED CRC NATIONS Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/GC/7/Rev.1 20 September 2006 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD Fortieth Session Geneva, 12-30 September 2005 GENERAL COMMENT No. 7 (2005) Implementing child rights in early childhood I. INTRODUCTION 1. This general comment arises out of the Committee’s experiences of reviewing States parties’ reports. In many cases, very little information has been offered about early childhood, with comments limited mainly to child mortality, birth registration and health care. The Committee felt the need for a discussion on the broader implications of the Convention on the Rights of the Child for young children. Accordingly, in 2004, the Committee devoted its day of general discussion to the theme “Implementing child rights in early childhood”. This resulted in a set of recommendations (see CRC/C/143, sect. VII) as well as the decision to prepare a general comment on this important topic. Through this general comment, the Committee wishes to encourage recognition that young children are holders of all rights enshrined in the Convention and that early childhood is a critical period for the realization of these rights. The Committee’s working definition of “early childhood” is all young children: at birth and throughout infancy; during the preschool years; as well as during the transition to school (see paragraph 4 below). II. OBJECTIVES OF THE GENERAL COMMENT 2. The objectives of the general comment are: (a) To strengthen understanding of the human rights
    [Show full text]
  • Child First Justice the Research Evidence-Base Full Report
    / ni Loughborough |*S University Child First Justice The research evidence-base Full report Professor Stephen Case and Ann Browning Social and Policy Studies lboro.ac.uk/ssh/child-first-justice This item was submitted to Loughborough's Research Repository by the author. Items in Figshare are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated. Child First Justice: the research evidence-base [Full report] PLEASE CITE THE PUBLISHED VERSION PUBLISHER Loughborough University VERSION VoR (Version of Record) LICENCE CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 REPOSITORY RECORD Case, Stephen, and Ann Browning. 2021. “Child First Justice: The Research Evidence-base [full Report]”. Loughborough University. https://hdl.handle.net/2134/14152040.v1. Child First Justice: The research evidence-base Professor Stephen Case and Ann Browning Social and Policy Studies Loughborough University UK The researchers would like to acknowledge the support of the Higher Education Innovation Fund, the UKRI and Loughborough University. Front cover image © ilona75/iStock/Getty Images FOREWORD We welcome this independently commissioned research to interrogate the evidence base behind the YJB’s principle describing the components of a Child First approach to youth justice work. If there was any doubt as to the clear evidence base behind our thinking, then this research should set this straight. As an evidence driven organisation, Child First has always been for us about ‘what works’ in preventing offending by children - it supports fewer victims and safer communities and is not about a mantra or an ideology. The youth justice system has been hugely successful at reducing the number of children entering the system and children within the secure estate.
    [Show full text]
  • Elevate Children Funders Group Strategic Plan Summary (2021-2023)
    Elevate Children Funders Group Strategic Plan (2021-2023) .. r. oa n s rld whe n ca a wo re all childre ing on si vi n E 1 Dear ECFG members and partners, In 2021, Elevate Children Funders Group (ECFG) celebrates a new areas of work in decolonizing philanthropy and child and decade of history working within philanthropy to more effectively youth participation as core elements of ensuring we reach our meet the needs of the world’s most marginalized and vulnerable end goals. It calls on all of us - as individuals, organizations, a children. During one of the most tumultuous times in recent network, and a field - to collaborate more purposefully in support memory, in the middle of the global COVID-19 pandemic and of increased and improved funding for children and youth. worldwide challenges to racial injustice and colonial structures, our network set out to reexamine and renew our shared purpose, We are eager and excited to dive into implementing this plan and chart a path forward via a new strategic plan. with our members and the broader community of organizations and individuals working to change the world for children. ECFG With the expert help of I.G. Advisors, we designed an ambitious is a small but intrepid group that recognizes that we truly are and incredibly participatory process including extensive stronger together. May the enthusiasm and energy we have put consultations with external stakeholders and a series of grantee into this effort continue to carry us forward as we collectively focus groups. Together, we engaged in serious inquiry about author the next important chapter of ECFG’s work to help the change we wanted to see in the world, how we thought change the world with and for children.
    [Show full text]
  • Willems-Ittakes
    Principles and promises in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Citation for published version (APA): Willems, J. C. M. (2012). Principles and promises in the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities. In L. Waddington, G. Quinn, & E. Flynn (Eds.), European Yearbook of Disability Law (pp. 59-100). Intersentia. European Yearbook of Disability Law No. 3 Document status and date: Published: 01/01/2012 Document Version: Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Please check the document version of this publication: • A submitted manuscript is the version of the article upon submission and before peer-review. There can be important differences between the submitted version and the official published version of record. People interested in the research are advised to contact the author for the final version of the publication, or visit the DOI to the publisher's website. • The final author version and the galley proof are versions of the publication after peer review. • The final published version features the final layout of the paper including the volume, issue and page numbers. Link to publication General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research.
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Pan American Child Congress
    CD/doc. 05/13 21st Pan American Child Congress DRAFT AGENDA Presentation 1. Methodology Conferences Experts Panels States’ Presentations Information Fair Pan American Child Forum NGO Forum 2. Regulations and Proceedings Rules of Procedure Draft Resolutions Convocation Delegations Procedures for the Election of Authorities 3. Significance of the Subject Matter Twenty-Five Years after the Adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC): Building Peaceful Environments The Sexual Exploitation of Children Adolescents in Conflict with the Law and Criminal Liability Systems 1 Presentation The Inter-American Children’s Institute is an OAS Specialized Organization and has a wide experience in promoting and defending the rights of children in the region. It receives mandates that issue from the Summits of the Americas, the General Assembly and the Permanent Council. The Institute’s own authorities are the Directing Council and the Pan American Child Congress, both composed of senior authorities specializing in children from the Americas and the Caribbean. The Directing Council meets yearly, pursuant to the Institute’s statutes, and holds extraordinary meetings if the states consider it advisable. The Pan American Congress meets every five years and promotes the sharing of experience and knowledge in specialized subjects among the member states of the Inter-American System, in order to establish a regional agenda for the development of the promotion and protection of children in the Americas and the Caribbean. Since 1916, the Pan American Congresses have been instances of dialogue, reflection and communication in which progress in fulfilling the rights of children and adolescents made by States in the hemisphere become visible.
    [Show full text]
  • Advance Edited Version Distr.: General 4 May 2017
    A/HRC/35/13 Advance edited version Distr.: General 4 May 2017 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty-fifth session 6-23 June 2017 Agenda items 2 and 3 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports of the Office of the High Commissioner and the Secretary-General Promotion and protection of all human rights, civil political, economic, social and cultural rights, including the right to development Analytical study on the relationship between climate change and the full and effective enjoyment of the rights of the child Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights Summary The present analytical study on the relationship between climate change and the full and effective enjoyment of the rights of the child is submitted pursuant to Human Rights Council resolution 32/33. In the study, the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights examines the impacts of climate change on children and the related human rights obligations and responsibilities of States and other actors, including the elements of a child rights-based approach to climate change policies. The study provides examples of good practices and concludes with several recommendations. A/HRC/35/13 Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Key impacts of climate change on children .................................................................................. 3 A. Extreme
    [Show full text]
  • Child Youth Resource Guide
    Child and Youth Participation Resource Guide Child and Youth Participation Resource Guide All photographs are courtesy of UNICEF Compiled by Junita Upadhyay © Copyright UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office, 2006 Any part of Child and Youth Participation Resource Guide may be freely reproduced with the appropriate acknowledgment. Layout and design: Keen Publishing (Thailand) Co, Ltd. This guide has been compiled and produced with financial support from the Swedish International Development Agency For further information contact: UNICEF East Asia and Pacific Regional Office 19 Phra Atit Road Bangkok 10200 Thailand Tel: (66 2) 356 9400 Fax: (66 2) 280 3563 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.unicef.org Acknowledgements The production of this guide has benefited greatly from the contributions of many people who believe in the wisdom and vitality of children. Thank you for sharing your ideas, suggestions and resources. I would like to thank Alana Kapell, Claire O’Kane, Clare Feinstein, Chongkolnee Tientrarat, Clifford Meyers, Dale Rutstein, Elizabeth Protacio de Castro, Gauri Pradhan, Gregory Carl, Guy Thompstone, Henk van Beers, Helen Veitch, Heike Roschanski, Jason Hart, Jay Wisecarver, Judith Ennew, Kim Sabo, Manuel Finelli, Mattias Bryneson, Mark Thomas, Ming Viado, Mie Takaki, Natthinee Rodraksa, Neelam Singh, Olof Sandkull, Perpetua Kirby, Ravi Karkara, Reiko Nishijima, Serap Maktav, Shikha Ghildyal, Sanjay Upadhyay, Selim Iltus, Teresa Stuart, Victor Karunan, Vimala Crispin and Vijay Rajkumar. A final note of appreciation goes to Joachim Theis, the project supervisor, for his guidance and intense enthusiasm and expertise on this subject. 3 Foreword The participation of children in schools, community action, organizations, media, programmes, policy advocacy and governance has gained growing support over the past 15 years.
    [Show full text]
  • General Comment No. 20 (2016) on the Implementation of the Rights of the Child During Adolescence
    United Nations CRC/C/GC/20* Convention on the Distr.: General 6 December 2016 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child General comment No. 20 (2016) on the implementation of the rights of the child during adolescence * Second reissue for technical reasons (20 January 2017). GE.16-21563(E) CRC/C/GC/20 Contents Page I. Introduction ................................................................................................................................... 3 II. Objectives ...................................................................................................................................... 4 III. The case for a focus on adolescents .............................................................................................. 4 IV. General principles of the Convention ............................................................................................ 5 A. Right to development ............................................................................................................ 5 B. Non-discrimination ............................................................................................................... 7 C. Best interests ......................................................................................................................... 7 D. Right to be heard and to participation ................................................................................... 7 V. Adolescents requiring particular attention ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ask the Experts from the AFCC Enews
    Ask the Experts from the AFCC eNEWS: Guidance from Leading Family Law Professionals www.afccnet.org Ask the Experts from the AFCC eNEWS: Guidance from Leading Family Law Professionals Edited by: Andrea Clark, MSW Larry V. Swall, JD October 2015 Copyright© Association of Family and Conciliation Courts. All rights reserved. This publication may be reproduced and disseminated without modification, for educational purposes. ASK THE EXPERTS | 1 CONTENTS Introduction 5 Top Ten Tips for New Parenting Coordinators (February 2008) 6 Christine A. Coates, MEd, JD, Robin M. Deutsch, PhD, Barbara Jo Fidler, PhD, Joan B. Kelly, PhD, Arnold Shienvold, PhD, and Matthew J. Sullivan, PhD Top Ten Tips for Interviewing Children for Custody Evaluations (April 2008) 7 Kathleen Clark, PhD, Leslie M. Drozd, PhD, Jonathan Gould, PhD, ABPP, Mindy F. Mitnick, EdM, MA, Kathy Kuehnle, PhD, and Philip M. Stahl, PhD, ABPP Top Ten Tips for Reducing Work Stress (June 2008) 8 Vicki Carpel Miller, MS, LMFT, and Ellie Izzo, PhD Top Ten Tips for Mediators to Move through Emotions (August 2008) 9 Sue Bronson, MS Ten Ethical Considerations for Parenting Coordinators (September 2008) 10 Linda B. Fieldstone, MEd, and Nina M. Zollo, Esq. Ten Tips for Judges and Judicial Officers in Matters with Self-Represented Parties (October 2008) 11 Hon. Emile R. Kruzick, Hon. David R. Aston, Hon. Peter Boshier, and Hon. Hugh E. Starnes Ten Tips for Separated and Divorced Families for the Holidays (November 2008) 12 Peg Libby Ten Risk Management Tips for Child Custody Evaluators (December 2008) 13 David A. Martindale, PhD, ABPP Top Ten Tips on Court Program and Community Collaborations (January 2009) 15 Linda B.
    [Show full text]