Tabelle Der Zuchtwertschätzung

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Tabelle Der Zuchtwertschätzung Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München Tabelle der Zuchtwertschätzung Gültig bis: 31.12.2017 Nur Boxer bis zu einem Alter von 12 Jahren Erstes gelistetes Wurfjahr: 2005 © Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München Erstellt mit: 5.1 ZBNr. Name des Boxers HD Kryptorchismus 224883 Aragon vom Wachstein 80 97 224884 Arthos vom Wachstein 83 97 224885 Aida vom Wachstein 77 107 224886 Akhira vom Wachstein 80 100 224887 Alexa vom Wachstein 80 100 224888 Lesko vom Eisbachtal 87 97 224889 Lunix vom Eisbachtal 82 115 224890 Latoya vom Eisbachtal 76 101 224891 Leyka vom Eisbachtal 86 101 224892 Bax von Kassiopeia 87 95 224893 Bonzo von Kassiopeia 85 95 224894 Bosco von Kassiopeia 88 95 224895 Buddy von Kassiopeia 87 95 224896 Becki von Kassiopeia 87 97 224897 Bella von Kassiopeia 87 97 224898 Bo von Kassiopeia 81 97 224899 Bonita von Kassiopeia 85 97 224900 Bonny von Kassiopeia 87 97 224901 Larissa vom Grossen Ritter 85 100 224902 Lou-Lou vom Grossen Ritter 85 100 224903 Sandro vom Zorenappel 104 96 224904 Sanjo vom Zorenappel 102 96 224905 Sanos vom Zorenappel 102 96 224906 Sharan vom Zorenappel 102 96 224907 Safra vom Zorenappel 102 98 224908 Sanja vom Zorenappel 102 98 224909 Sheila vom Zorenappel 105 98 224910 Syra vom Zorenappel 102 98 224911 Karlo vom Skarabäus 86 99 224912 Kasper vom Skarabäus 86 99 224913 Käte vom Skarabäus 86 103 Seite 1 Zuchtwertschätzung gültig bis: 31.12.2017 © Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München 5.1 ZBNr. Name des Boxers HD Kryptorchismus 224914 Kira vom Skarabäus 92 103 224915 Lerry vom Würzbachtal 89 91 224916 Larynna vom Würzbachtal 87 92 224917 Luna vom Würzbachtal 89 92 224918 Paolo vom Henneberger Schloß 91 94 224919 Petro vom Henneberger Schloß 91 94 224920 Pit vom Henneberger Schloß 91 94 224921 Pia vom Henneberger Schloß 91 96 224922 Badriya von Inspee 99 97 224923 Bahiya von Inspee 114 96 224925 Raoul vom Großherzogtum-Hessen 84 104 224926 Roma vom Großherzogtum-Hessen 88 109 224927 Romina vom Großherzogtum-Hessen 79 97 224928 Ronja vom Großherzogtum-Hessen 84 97 224929 Roxana vom Großherzogtum-Hessen 84 97 224930 Enrico von der Allgäu-Stadt Wangen 101 123 224931 Eros von der Allgäu-Stadt Wangen 99 96 224941 Aaron vom Hause Bresicke 98 91 224942 Apollo vom Hause Bresicke 113 87 224943 Alpina vom Hause Bresicke 103 92 224945 Dexter von der Buddenburg 78 88 224946 Duke von der Buddenburg 81 88 224947 Baffy von der Burg Reifenberg 78 93 224948 Bea von der Burg Reifenberg 77 93 224949 Belinda von der Burg Reifenberg 77 93 224950 Britta von der Burg Reifenberg 74 93 224951 Valley vom Elsavatal 84 94 224952 Vin vom Elsavatal 85 94 224953 Vranjo vom Elsavatal 85 94 224954 Vanessa vom Elsavatal 85 94 224955 Vanya vom Elsavatal 85 94 224956 Veelia vom Elsavatal 85 94 224957 Vieta vom Elsavatal 85 94 224958 Viola vom Elsavatal 76 95 224959 Vivien vom Elsavatal 81 91 224960 Aaron von der Isar 102 94 224961 Acki von der Isar 102 94 224962 Aiko von der Isar 100 94 224963 Hannes vom Paradies 95 98 Seite 2 Zuchtwertschätzung gültig bis: 31.12.2017 © Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München 5.1 ZBNr. Name des Boxers HD Kryptorchismus 224964 Henry vom Paradies 95 98 224965 Hugo vom Paradies 95 98 224966 Hanni vom Paradies 95 101 224967 Hella vom Paradies 95 101 224968 Hexe vom Paradies 95 101 224971 Rasputin vom Weiten Land 87 94 224972 Rico vom Weiten Land 87 94 224973 Robin vom Weiten Land 87 94 224974 Rocky vom Weiten Land 87 94 224975 Roy vom Weiten Land 87 94 224976 Rufus vom Weiten Land 87 94 224977 Raja vom Weiten Land 89 104 224978 Ramira vom Weiten Land 88 91 224979 Yankee vom Eick 99 97 224980 Yanosch vom Eick 104 97 224981 Yesper vom Eick 104 97 224982 Yoschka vom Eick 104 97 224983 Yava vom Eick 115 100 224984 Yello vom Eick 104 100 224985 Yudy vom Eick 104 100 224986 Yule vom Eick 104 100 224987 Titan vom Bockreiter 91 83 224988 Tizian vom Bockreiter 88 91 224989 Turay vom Bockreiter 89 91 224990 Tara vom Bockreiter 88 91 224991 Taru vom Bockreiter 88 91 224992 Tracey vom Bockreiter 86 93 224993 Dany-Sahne von der Hummelmühle 83 102 224994 Duchesse von der Hummelmühle 78 102 224995 Donna vom Lappan 88 102 224996 Aragon von der Frankenburg 103 92 224997 Akira von der Frankenburg 115 95 224999 Galanthus von der Bismarcksäule 93 94 225000 Geum von der Bismarcksäule 93 94 225001 Genista von der Bismarcksäule 93 96 225002 Gentiana von der Bismarcksäule 100 96 225003 Gill-Gazania von der Bismarcksäule 86 96 225004 Yak von der Klinge 104 94 225005 Yankee von der Klinge 109 94 Seite 3 Zuchtwertschätzung gültig bis: 31.12.2017 © Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München 5.1 ZBNr. Name des Boxers HD Kryptorchismus 225006 Yannik von der Klinge 115 94 225007 Yeti von der Klinge 104 94 225008 Yorck von der Klinge 99 92 225009 Yukon von der Klinge 100 95 225010 Yaris von der Klinge 104 95 225011 Yasmin von der Klinge 108 92 225012 Zeno vom Fichtengarten 103 97 225013 Zeus vom Fichtengarten 112 97 225014 Zarah-Lena vom Fichtengarten 103 99 225015 Zilli vom Fichtengarten 103 99 225016 Zora vom Fichtengarten 103 99 225017 Zwiebel vom Fichtengarten 103 99 225021 Jerome von der Sorsumer Mühle 91 93 225022 Jagquline von der Sorsumer Mühle 91 95 225023 Jasmin von der Sorsumer Mühle 91 95 225024 Joana von der Sorsumer Mühle 91 95 225025 Denzel vom Riesbachtal 98 96 225026 Domingo vom Riesbachtal 98 96 225027 Domino vom Riesbachtal 98 96 225028 Doug vom Riesbachtal 98 96 225029 Donna vom Riesbachtal 98 98 225030 Dora vom Riesbachtal 98 98 225031 Dotty vom Riesbachtal 98 98 225032 Duchess vom Riesbachtal 98 98 225033 Ted von Maximilian 78 91 225034 Ticon von Maximilian 78 91 225035 Titus von Maximilian 78 91 225036 Torino von Maximilian 78 91 225037 Tyrass von Maximilian 83 91 225038 Tyson von Maximilian 92 91 225039 Taiga von Maximilian 86 96 225040 Trinity von Maximilian 85 91 225041 Karim von der Boxer-Meute 89 101 225042 Kim von der Boxer-Meute 89 98 225043 Kayla von der Boxer-Meute 89 102 225044 Kira von der Boxer-Meute 89 102 225045 Kleo-Emma von der Boxer-Meute 90 102 225046 Yukon vom Drosselberg 120 92 225047 Yana vom Drosselberg 102 95 Seite 4 Zuchtwertschätzung gültig bis: 31.12.2017 © Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München 5.1 ZBNr. Name des Boxers HD Kryptorchismus 225048 Beneton vom Soldan Park 91 129 225049 Bentley vom Soldan Park 91 103 225050 Black-Berry vom Soldan Park 91 129 225051 Blacky vom Soldan Park 91 103 225052 Baccara vom Soldan Park 92 108 225053 Betty vom Soldan Park 85 108 225054 Bonita vom Soldan Park 91 108 225055 Ice von der Flachswiese 105 101 225056 Aika von der Boxerzone 93 98 225057 Amely von der Boxerzone 93 98 225058 Amy von der Boxerzone 93 98 225059 Angel von der Boxerzone 93 98 225060 Arlett von der Boxerzone 93 98 225061 Desperado vom Remstalblick 79 106 225062 Dino vom Remstalblick 85 106 225063 Django vom Remstalblick 85 106 225064 Dagmar vom Remstalblick 85 112 225065 Dea vom Remstalblick 85 112 225066 Denise vom Remstalblick 85 112 225067 Donna vom Remstalblick 85 112 225068 Dorle vom Remstalblick 85 112 225069 Bulduin von der Theodor-Heuss-Stadt 96 127 225070 Boromir von der Theodor-Heuss-Stadt 96 127 225071 Jago von der Morre 96 95 225072 Jan von der Morre 89 95 225073 John von der Morre 96 95 225074 Jaska von der Morre 97 91 225075 Jelka von der Morre 96 98 225076 Kanto von der Morre 81 100 225077 Kenzo von der Morre 78 94 225078 Kim von der Morre 84 96 225079 Kimi von der Morre 85 96 225080 Kosmo von der Morre 84 96 225081 Kunan von der Morre 85 96 225082 Karina von der Morre 91 98 225083 Klara von der Morre 85 98 225084 Kansas von Santana 99 97 225085 Karim von Santana 99 97 225086 Karlino von Santana 104 97 Seite 5 Zuchtwertschätzung gültig bis: 31.12.2017 © Boxerklub E.V. Sitz München 5.1 ZBNr. Name des Boxers HD Kryptorchismus 225087 Karlo von Santana 99 97 225088 Kimba von Santana 99 123 225089 Klitschko von Santana 99 97 225090 Ecco von Bemady 105 142 225091 El-Chico von Bemady 109 116 225092 Elroy von Bemady 105 142 225093 Erasmus von Bemady 105 142 225094 Excalibur von Bemady 105 142 225095 Etana von Bemady 105 125 225097 Elvis von der Siegperle 77 90 225098 Enzo von der Siegperle 82 94 225099 Elina von der Siegperle 84 96 225100 Emily von der Siegperle 82 96 225101 Emma von der Siegperle 86 99 225102 Enjoy von der Siegperle 79 105 225103 Eyka von der Siegperle 82 96 225104 Tao vom Waffenschmied 77 92 225105 Tarek-Yven vom Waffenschmied 82 92 225106 Tattoo vom Waffenschmied 82 92 225107 Tonio vom Waffenschmied 81 92 225108 Touche vom Waffenschmied 82 92 225109 Tyson vom Waffenschmied 82 92 225110 Adolf vom Elfental 104 96 225111 Askan vom Elfental 98 96 225112 Atze vom Elfental 111 123 225113 Arwen vom Elfental 106 97 225114 Ashanty vom Elfental 102 95 225115 Gerry von Goldbrunnen 90 94 225116 Gino von Goldbrunnen 93 94 225117 Grey von Goldbrunnen 93 94 225118 Gina von Goldbrunnen 93 96 225119 Gisa von Goldbrunnen 93 96 225120 Goldie von Goldbrunnen 93 96 225121 Gundi von Goldbrunnen 93 96 225122 Sammy vom Weiten Land 81 96 225123 Samuel vom Weiten Land 81 96 225124 Silas vom Weiten Land 81 96 225125 Sumo vom Weiten Land 81 96 225126 Sanja vom Weiten Land 81 98 Seite 6 Zuchtwertschätzung gültig bis: 31.12.2017 © Boxerklub E.V.
Recommended publications
  • CARMENES Input Catalogue of M Dwarfs IV. New Rotation Periods from Photometric Time Series
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. pk30 c ESO 2018 October 9, 2018 CARMENES input catalogue of M dwarfs IV. New rotation periods from photometric time series E. D´ıezAlonso1;2;3, J. A. Caballero4, D. Montes1, F. J. de Cos Juez2, S. Dreizler5, F. Dubois6, S. V. Jeffers5, S. Lalitha5, R. Naves7, A. Reiners5, I. Ribas8;9, S. Vanaverbeke10;6, P. J. Amado11, V. J. S. B´ejar12;13, M. Cort´es-Contreras4, E. Herrero8;9, D. Hidalgo12;13;1, M. K¨urster14, L. Logie6, A. Quirrenbach15, S. Rau6, W. Seifert15, P. Sch¨ofer5, and L. Tal-Or5;16 1 Departamento de Astrof´ısicay Ciencias de la Atm´osfera, Facultad de Ciencias F´ısicas,Universidad Complutense de Madrid, E-280140 Madrid, Spain; e-mail: [email protected] 2 Departamento de Explotaci´ony Prospecci´onde Minas, Escuela de Minas, Energ´ıay Materiales, Universidad de Oviedo, E-33003 Oviedo, Asturias, Spain 3 Observatorio Astron´omicoCarda, Villaviciosa, Asturias, Spain (MPC Z76) 4 Centro de Astrobiolog´ıa(CSIC-INTA), Campus ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Ca~nada,Madrid, Spain 5 Institut f¨ur Astrophysik, Georg-August-Universit¨at G¨ottingen, Friedrich-Hund-Platz 1, D-37077 G¨ottingen, Germany 6 AstroLAB IRIS, Provinciaal Domein \De Palingbeek", Verbrandemolenstraat 5, B-8902 Zillebeke, Ieper, Belgium 7 Observatorio Astron´omicoNaves, Cabrils, Barcelona, Spain (MPC 213) 8 Institut de Ci`enciesde l'Espai (CSIC-IEEC), Campus UAB, c/ de Can Magrans s/n, E-08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona, Spain 9 Institut d'Estudis Espacials de Catalunya (IEEC), E-08034 Barcelona, Spain 10
    [Show full text]
  • Gravitational Lensing from a Spacetime Perspective
    Gravitational Lensing from a Spacetime Perspective Volker Perlick Physics Department Lancaster University Lancaster LA1 4YB United Kingdom email: [email protected] Abstract The theory of gravitational lensing is reviewed from a spacetime perspective, without quasi-Newtonian approximations. More precisely, the review covers all aspects of gravita- tional lensing where light propagation is described in terms of lightlike geodesics of a metric of Lorentzian signature. It includes the basic equations and the relevant techniques for calcu- lating the position, the shape, and the brightness of images in an arbitrary general-relativistic spacetime. It also includes general theorems on the classification of caustics, on criteria for multiple imaging, and on the possible number of images. The general results are illustrated with examples of spacetimes where the lensing features can be explicitly calculated, including the Schwarzschild spacetime, the Kerr spacetime, the spacetime of a straight string, plane gravitational waves, and others. arXiv:1010.3416v1 [gr-qc] 17 Oct 2010 1 1 Introduction In its most general sense, gravitational lensing is a collective term for all effects of a gravitational field on the propagation of electromagnetic radiation, with the latter usually described in terms of rays. According to general relativity, the gravitational field is coded in a metric of Lorentzian signature on the 4-dimensional spacetime manifold, and the light rays are the lightlike geodesics of this spacetime metric. From a mathematical point of view, the theory of gravitational lensing is thus the theory of lightlike geodesics in a 4-dimensional manifold with a Lorentzian metric. The first observation of a ‘gravitational lensing’ effect was made when the deflection of star light by our Sun was verified during a Solar eclipse in 1919.
    [Show full text]
  • How Many Lambda Boo Stars Are Binaries?
    1 1 arXiv:astro-ph/9906009v1 1 Jun 1999 A&A manuscript no. ASTRONOMY (will be inserted by hand later) AND Your thesaurus codes are: 08(08.01.3;08.01.1;08.03.2) ASTROPHYSICS How many λ Boo stars are binaries ? Rosanna Faraggiana1, and Piercarlo Bonifacio2 1 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit`adegli Studi di Trieste, Via G.B.Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy 2 Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste,Via G.B.Tiepolo 11, I-34131 Trieste, Italy received .../Accepted... Abstract. In the attempt to shed new light on the λ class. The metal abundances obtained up to now reveal a Boo phenomenon we analyzed the astrometric, photomet- high scatter from star to star. ric and spectroscopic characteristics of stars out of a list Details on the evolution with time of the λ Boo defini- of recently selected λ Boo candidates. tion are summarized in Faraggiana & Gerbaldi (1998); the We show that the class is still ill-defined and discuss not clearly defined properties of these stars are, at least the possibility that some, if not most stars presently clas- partially, responsible of the various hypotheses proposed sified as λ Boo, are in fact binary pairs and that peculiar to explain the λ Boo phenomenon as well as of the uncer- abundances may not correspond to actual values if the av- tainty on the age attributed to these objects, which spans erage values of the atmospheric parameters Teff and log g from that of stars not yet on the Main Sequence to that are assumed and the effect of veiling is not taken into ac- of old objects descending from contact binary systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Nexstar 8 & 11 GPS Star List
    Double SAO # RA (hr) RA (min) Dec Deg Dec Amin Mag Const Sep HD 225020 2 0 2.8 80 16.9 7.7,9.9 Cep Sep AB:16 HD 5679 U Cep 168 1 2.3 81 52.5 6.9,11.2,12.9 Cep Sep AB:14, Sep AC:21 HD 7471 218 1 19.1 80 51.7 7.2,8 Cep Sep AB:130 HD 8890 Alpha UMi; 1 UMi; Polaris 308 2 31.6 89 15.9 2,9,13,12 UMi Sep AB:18, Sep AC:45, Sep AD:83 HD 105943 OS 117 1991 12 11.0 81 42.6 6,8.3 Cam Sep AB:67 HD 106798 2009 12 16.2 80 7.5 7.2,7.8 Cam Sep AB:14 HD 112028 2102 12 49.2 83 24.8 5.4,5.9 Cam Sep AB:22 HD 112651 2112 12 54.2 82 31.1 7.1,10.5 Cam Sep AB:10 HD 131616 2433 14 33.3 85 56.3 7.1,10.1 UMi Sep AB:3 HD 139777 Pi 1 Umi 2556 15 29.3 80 26.8 6.6,7.3,11 UMi Sep AB:31, Sep AC:154 HD 153751 Epsilon UMi 2770 16 46.0 82 2.2 4.2,11.2 UMi Sep AB:77 HD 166926 24 Umi 2940 17 30.7 86 58.1 8.5,9 UMi Sep AB:31 HD 184146 3209 19 15.1 83 27.8 6.5,10.6 Dra Sep AB:6 HD 196787 3408 20 28.2 81 25.4 5.6,11.1,6.9 Dra Sep AB:110, Sep AC:198 HD 196925 3413 20 29.4 81 5.3 6.1,9.3 Dra Sep AB:214 HD 209942 3673 21 58.3 82 52.2 6.9,7.5 Cep Sep AB:14 HD 919 4062 0 14.0 76 1.6 7.2,7.7 Cep Sep AB:76 HD 3366 4165 0 37.8 72 53.7 7,12.7 Cas Sep AB:32 HD 3553 4176 0 40.0 76 52.3 6.7,8.6 Cas Sep AB:116 HD 4161 H N 122; YZ Cas 4216 0 45.6 74 59.3 5.7,9.4 Cas Sep AB:36 HD 7406 4360 1 16.6 74 1.6 7.1,7.9 Cas Sep AB:61 HD 9774 40 Cas 4453 1 38.5 73 2.4 5.3,11.3 Cas Sep AB:53 HD 11316 4512 1 55.4 76 13.5 7.4,8.4 Cas Sep AB:3 HD 12013 4550 2 2.1 75 30.1 6.3,8.2,8.8 Cas Sep AB:1.3, Sep AC:117 HD 12111 48 Cas 4554 2 2.0 70 54.4 4.6,12.6 Cas Sep AB:51 HD 12173 4559 2 3.2 73 51.0 6.1,8.6 Cas
    [Show full text]
  • The Heterogeneous Class of Λ Bootis Stars?,??
    A&A 412, 447–464 (2003) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031472 & c ESO 2003 Astrophysics The heterogeneous class of λ Bootis stars?;?? M. Gerbaldi1,2, R. Faraggiana3,andO.Lai4 1 Institut d’Astrophysique, 98bis Bd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France 2 Lab. Astronomie, Bˆat. 470, Universit´e de Paris Sud XI, 91405 Orsay Cedex, France 3 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Universit`a degli Studi di Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 4 Canada-France-Hawaii Telescope (CFHT) Corporation, Kamuela, HI 96743, USA e-mail: [email protected] Received 10 June 2003 / Accepted 12 September 2003 Abstract. We demonstrate that it is arduous to define the λ Boo stars as a class of objects exhibiting uniform abundance peculiarities which would be generated by a mechanism altering the structure of their atmospheric layers. We collected the stars classified as λ Boo up to now and discuss their properties, in particular the important percentage of confirmed binaries producing composite spectra (including our adaptive optics observations) and of misclassified objects. The unexplained RV variables (and thus suspected binaries), the known SB for which we lack information on the companion, the stars with an UV flux inconsistent with their classification, and the fast rotating stars for which no accurate abundance analysis can be performed, are also reviewed. Key words. stars: atmospheres – stars: chemically peculiar – stars: binaries: spectroscopic 1. Introduction Only 12 stars were classified as λ BoointheCatalog of Stellar Groups (Jaschek & Egret 1982) and 2 of them The peculiarity of the λ Boo star was detected by Morgan et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Bootis Stars with Composite Spectra
    A&A 425, 615–626 (2004) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20040216 & c ESO 2004 Astrophysics λ Bootis stars with composite spectra R. Faraggiana1,P.Bonifacio2,E.Caffau2,M.Gerbaldi3,4, and M. Nonino2 1 Dipartimento di Astronomia, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 Istituto Nazionale per l’Astrofisica – Osservatorio Astronomico di Trieste, via G.B. Tiepolo 11, 34131 Trieste, Italy 3 Institut d’Astrophysique, 98 bis Bd. Arago, 75014 Paris, France 4 Université de Paris Sud XI, France Received 6 February 2004 / Accepted 3 June 2004 Abstract. Weexaminethelargesampleofλ Boo candidates collected in Table 1 of Gerbaldi et al. (2003) to see how many of them show composite spectra. Of the 132 λ Boo candidates we identify 22 which definitely show composite spectra and 15 more for which there are good reasons to suspect a composite spectrum. The percentage of λ Boo candidates with composite spectra is therefore >17% and possibly considerably higher. For such stars the λ Boo classification should be reconsidered taking into account the fact that their spectra are composite. We argue that some of the underabundances reported in the literature may simply be the result of the failure to consider the composite nature of the spectra. This leads to the legitimate suspicion that some, if not all, the λ Boo candidates are not chemically peculiar at all. A thorough analysis of even a single one of the λ Boo candidates with composite spectra, in which the composite nature of the spectrum is duly considered, which would demonstrate that the chemical peculiarities persist, would clear the doubt we presently have that the stars with composite spectra may not be λ Boo stars at all.
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of the Membership Probability of 212 Λ Boo Stars. I. a Catalogue
    Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia (PASA), Vol. 32, e036, 43 pages (2015). C Astronomical Society of Australia 2015; published by Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/pasa.2015.34 An Evaluation of the Membership Probability of 212 λ Boo Stars. I. A Catalogue Simon J. Murphy1,2,8, Christopher J. Corbally3, Richard O. Gray4, Kwang-Ping Cheng5, James E. Neff6, Chris Koen7, Charles A. Kuehn1,2, Ian Newsome4 and Quinlin Riggs4 1Sydney Institute for Astronomy (SIfA), School of Physics, University of Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 2Stellar Astrophysics Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark 3Vatican Observatory Research Group, Steward Observatory, Tucson, AZ 85721-0065, USA 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Appalachian State University, Boone, NC 28608, USA 5Department of Physics, California State University, Fullerton, CA, USA 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA 7Department of Statistics, University of the Western Cape, Private Bag X17, Bellville, 7535 Cape, South Africa 8Email: [email protected] (Received July 06, 2015; Accepted August 14, 2015) Abstract The literature on the λ Boo stars has grown to become somewhat heterogenous, as different authors have applied different criteria across the UV, optical, and infrared regions to determine the membership status of λ Boo candidates. We aim to clear up the confusion by consulting the literature on 212 objects that have been considered as λ Boo candidates, and subsequently evaluating the evidence in favour of their admission to the λ Boo class. We obtained new spectra of ∼90 of these candidates and classified them on the MK system to aid in the membership evaluations.
    [Show full text]
  • Determinación De Períodos De Rotación En Estrellas Enanas De Tipo Espectral M Y Búsqueda Y Caracterización De Sistemas Planetarios Con Técnicas Fotométricas
    UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS FÍSICAS TESIS DOCTORAL Determinación de períodos de rotación en estrellas enanas de tipo espectral M y búsqueda y caracterización de sistemas planetarios con técnicas fotométricas MEMORIA PARA OPTAR AL GRADO DE DOCTOR PRESENTADA POR Enrique Díez Alonso Directores Francisco Javier de Cos Juez David Montes Gutiérrez Madrid © Enrique Díez Alonso, 2019 UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID TESIS DOCTORAL Determinación de períodos de rotación en estrellas enanas de tipo espectral M y búsqueda y caracterización de sistemas planetarios con técnicas fotométricas Memoria que presenta: Supervisores: Enrique Díez Alonso Prof. Francisco Javier de Cos Juez Prof. David Montes Gutiérrez Memoria presentada para aspirar al grado de Doctor en Astrofísica en la Facultad de CC. Físicas Departamento de Física de la Tierra y Astrofísica 12 de junio de 2019 III Agradecimientos Este trabajo ha sido posible gracias a la ayuda y consejo prestado por mis directores, Javier de Cos Juez y David Montes Gutiérrez. Ha sido clave el trabajo de Rafael Re- bolo López y su equipo, de Jose Antonio Caballero Hernández, y de mis compañeros Sergio Luis Suárez Gómez y Carlos González Gutiérrez. Este es también lugar para agredecer el cariño y ayuda de mis compañeros y ami- gos de la Sociedad Astronómica Asturiana Omega, a Carolina por apoyarme siempre, a Lorenzo, y a mis padres. V Resumen Contexto En la búsqueda y estudio de planetas tipo Tierra, las estrellas enanas M son ob- jetivos primarios. Esto es así ya que suman el 70 % de las estrellas de la Galaxia, y los planetas tipo Tierra tienden a ser más abundantes según la masa de las estrellas decrece.
    [Show full text]