Thanksgiving Point Donation Request
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
August 2013 Issue
AUGUST 2013 cycling utah.com 1 VOLUME 21 NUMBER 6 FREE AUGUST 2013 cycling utah 2013 UTAH, IDAHO, & WESTERN EVENT CALENDAR INSIDE! ROAD MOUNTAIN TRIATHLON TOURING RACING TOUR OF COMMUTING UTAH GUIDE MOUNTAIN WEST CYCLING MAGAZINE WEST CYCLING MOUNTAIN ADVOCACY INSIDE! 2 cycling utah.com AUGUST 2013 SPEAKING OF SPOKES Reflections on a Great Tour de France ment for the upcoming Tour de from Tour news during the day is come to an end. By David Ward France. Well, it has come and gone, finished. Sadly, the daily spectacle of Being the 100th staging of the my late night Tour watching is over, watching the world’s best bike riders Tour, great effort went into making it Last month, I wrote of my excite- my constant efforts to shield myself battle over the roads of France has a special event this year. And by my 4543 S. 700 E., Suite 200 reckoning, the organizers succeeded well. While the fight for the overall Salt Lake City, UT 84107 victory was not as exciting as one might hope, there was plenty in this www.cyclingutah.com year’s Tour to render it as thrilling and unique a Tour as I can remember You can reach us by phone: watching. (801) 268-2652 I had hoped the battle for the Our Fax number: maillot jaune would be a more tightly (801) 263-1010 contested affair. But Chris Froome pretty much wrapped it up on the Dave Iltis, Editor & first mountain stage, blowing all the competition away on Stage 8’s final Advertising climb to Ax 3 Domaines. -
How Alan Ashton's Side Project to Support His Family Produced An
Reprinted from the Spring 2019 issue of Philanthropy magazine (PhilMag.org) By Shannon Toronto How Alan Ashton’s side project to support his family produced an international company Gand a local landmark 48 PHILANTHROPY bolded; and, in later versions, font size and style, sophisticated graphics, In the late 1970s, Karen and Alan Ashton and tables were possible. The program his children earned from allowances were expecting their eighth child, and included a spellchecker, thesaurus, and chores. He would often sit and money was tight. Alan had a job as a and word count. In 1986, it was the ask them how much they would like to computer-science professor at Brigham bestselling software application, and contribute as a “fast offering,” an amount Young University, but Karen had to push in 1987, Ashton left BYU to lead his in addition to their 10 percent tithe. his salary to its limits, devising ways to company full-time. Early in their marriage, when the family feed their growing family with a pound Meanwhile the Ashton family kept struggled financially, Karen remembered of hamburger. The couple brainstormed growing, until the couple had eleven hearing a leader ask members to ways to cut corners on spending and children (who have by now produced 64 consider giving as a fast offering over the supplement the family income, weighing grandchildren). Karen said she knew she cost of two skipped meals “much, much whether Alan should take on consulting was comfortable financially when she more—ten times more where we are in a work. But then Alan remembered a could buy anything she wanted at the position to do it.” Karen determined to dormant idea. -
Supporting Information
Supporting Information for Tyrant dinosaur evolution tracks the rise and fall of Late Cretaceous oceans Mark A. Loewen1,*, Randall B. Irmis1, Joseph J. W. Sertich2, Philip J. Currie3 Scott D. Sampson1,2 1Natural History Museum of Utah and Department of Geology & Geophysics, University of Utah, 301 Wakara Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108-1214, United States of America, 2Department of Earth Sciences, Denver Museum of Nature & Science, 2001 Colorado Blvd, Denver, CO 80205, United States of America, 3University of Alberta, CW405 Biological Sciences, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 2E9, Canada *Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to: M.A.L. ([email protected]). Table of Contents 1. Table S1: Institutional Abbreviations 2 2. Table S2: Sources of Character Scoring 3 3. Phylogenetic Analysis Characters 4 4. Table S3: Taxon Scorings 47 5. Figure S1: Numbered Nodes for the Synapomorphy List 55 6. Table S4: Synapomorphy List 56 7. Table S5: Stratigraphic Position of Select Taxa 59 8. Table S6. Results of the Biogeographic Analysis 60 9. Additional References 68 Loewen et al. — Tyrant Dinosaur Evolution —Supporting Information — 1 TABLE S1: INSTITUTIONAL ABBREVIATIONS AMNH, American Museum of Natural History, New York, New York; ANSP, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia, Philadelpia, Pennsylvania; BSP; Bürgermeister-Müller-Museum in Solnhofen, Germany; BSPAS, Bayerische Staatsammlung für Paläontologie und historische Geologie, Munich, Germany; BYU, Brigham Young University Museum of Paleontology, Provo, Utah; CEU, Utah State University College of Eastern Utah Prehistoric Museum, Price, Utah; CM, Carnegie Museum of Natural History, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania; DNM, Dinosaur National Monument, Jensen, Utah; FMNH, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, Illinois; FRDC, Fossil Research and Development Center, Gansu Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration, Lanzhou, P. -
Jordan River Natural Conservation Corridor Report
The Jordan River Natural Conservation Corridor Report Prepared by the National Audubon Society for the Mitigation Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service September 2000 Table of Contents Chapter 1 Overview of the Jordan River Corridor and Development of the Plan ...............1 Chapter 2 Physical Domain Hydrologic Regime .............................................. 2-1 Stream Channel and Floodplain Structure ............................. 2-4 Water Quality ................................................... 2-8 Biological Domain Terrestrial Wildlife .............................................. 2-11 Avian Wildlife ................................................. 2-13 Fisheries ...................................................... 2-16 Vegetation .................................................... 2-18 Social Domain Human Use and Management of the River Corridor .................... 2-24 Chapter 3 Issues and Recommendations Issue A: Alteration of the Jordan River from its Pre-Settlement Condition and Consequences of Alteration ................................ 3-1 Issue B: Coordination of Jurisdictions ............................... 3-8 Issue C: Awareness of Local Government and Civic Groups of the Natural Values of the Jordan River ................................... 3-9 Issue D: Coordination with Golf Courses ............................ 3-10 Issue E: Education of Neighbors along the Corridor ................... 3-10 Issue F: Pre-treatment of Stormwater Runoff or Other Non-point Discharges .............................. -
Phase One Report Table of Contents
Point of the Mountain Visioning Process Phase One Report Table of Contents The Commission 3 The Team 4 Introduction 5 Aspirational Vision 7 The Point of the Mountain Area 11 Process To Date 12 Outreach Results 15 Implementing the Vision 20 ◊ Industry Ecosystem 20 ◊ Infrastructure 25 ◊ Placemaking 34 Phase Two Preview 42 2 PointOfTheMountainFuture.org Point of the Mountain Visioning Process Phase One Report The Commission THE POINT OF THE MOUNTAIN COMMISSION With the passage of House Bill 318 in the 2016 legislative session, the Utah Legislature created the Point of the Mountain Development Commission (the Commission) to head a process to develop a vision for the future of the area surrounding the border between Salt Lake County and Utah County (the Point of the Mountain). HB318 tasks the Commission to: 1. Study and develop strategies to engage the public and collaborate with stakeholders, including providing a public forum to gather insight from citizens, and evaluating the costs and benefits of growth, land use, and economic development strategies. 2. Study and make recommendations regarding future transportation and infrastructure needs within the project area. 3. Study and make recommendations regarding financing economic development of and infrastructure investment in the project area. The Commission is headed by two co-chairs, Representative V. Lowry Snow and Christopher M. Conabee. The remainder of the Commission is comprised of thirteen members, representing cities in the area, the technology sector, economic development organizations, and other key interests in the region’s future. Name Organization Rep. V. Lowry Snow, Co-Chair Utah State House of Representatives Christopher M.