TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY that time was ’outside’ the marked boundary (Dumbong, 2004). In 1984, the Parks Enactment 1984 Enactment Parks the 1984, In 2004). (Dumbong, boundary marked the ’outside’ was time that whichat areas the develop and cultivate subdivide, to started then communities local permanent.The not is It compasses. the the (Nowegwildanimals hunting firewood,and plants, source natural the on rely still communities local (CRP) Park Range Crocker Introduction omnt Livelihood Crocker Conservation Community (CUZ) Zone Use Community Keywords: Online: press:In Accepted: Revised: Received: Use Zone byLocal Communities (CUZ) in 1
*Correspondingauthor
exact area ForestryComplex, Faculty of ScienceResourc andNatural approximate Conservation Community Awareness on 2
Sabah Parks,Lot 45Sabah & 46,Level 1 Crocker Range Park,Crocker Malaysia Range Sabah, AndyMojiol R. 30June 2016
RangePark 20May 2016 20 April20 2016 5 April5 2016 12May2016
;
wasdesi Mojiol
boundary on the ground was demarcated by the Park Park the by demarcated was ground the on boundary Awareness
accurate
gnated et al.et Highway, UMS, 88400,KotaUMS, Kinabalu, Sabah . E ,
; ; ; 2016. - , is LudiApin²
Mail: ¹ on but the local communities took the took communities local the but
* surrounded © Transactions© on Science and Technology to therefore highly integrate of CUZ existence The the conservation. with agree highly vegetables trees fruit by followed Senagang income of sources as cultivated vegetabl as such crops Cash trees. fruit and trees rubberas cropssuch permanent are identifiedcrops major The results. o ended data The community. local ofawareness conservation and perception the determined its cropbetweenrelationship the determined study This survival. for forest the on depend whocommunities local the of livelihoodsthe park and conservationpriorities betweenofbalancethethe a Community living community some to as area parks’ the inactivities prohibitsanyhuman 1984 Enactment Parks The A
bservations , Maureen , Tapuong²,J. Walter Lintangah the
88100 Kota88100 Kinabalu,
b enhance Transactionson Science and Technology. otiuin t te oa cmuiis livelihood. communities’ local the to contributions
andy s
map osre h ntrl csse, but ecosystem, natural the conserve
ta ct r structured s - Keningau/ , @ 5, Blok 5, Signature H, Office, KKTimes CoastalSquare,
Te td soe ta te oa cmuiis f h village the of communities local the that showed study The . collected was
withcoordinates.precise Basedonmap the andcoordinates, the the the management
u Use Zone (CUZ) is a management option in an optiontoan strikeattempt management in (CUZ)Zonea Use is . by human settlement on a on settlement human by ms.edu.my ecnae ma ad ag wr ue t smaie the summarize to used were range and mean Percentage,
& uvvl n lvlho o te oa communi local the of livelihood and survival recommended
usin. Information questions.
Jeph
s Tenom
et al et f h frs sc a pat fr od medicinal food, for plants as such forest the of
; ( by
such as durian, durian, as such
area area Tel:+60 t Sabah, ., 2003). The Park ThePark 2003). ., e approach nie h ae ad rciig cultivation. practicing and area the inside Rbe tes otiue te highest the contributed trees Rubber . face
Sompud to s identified is , MALAYSIA. , - f the of be practiced to es,Universiti MalaysiaSabah, Jalan MALAYSIA. - - face 88
ofCUZ mark
- sus ht related that issues Kg. in farmers 320000
s planted within the CUZ area and area CUZthewithin planted s interview ll corners of its boundary. The boundary. its of corners ll a as obtained also was
n fact, in ed 2016 langsat, ¹
es, 3
. , , but (1
as a a as boundary to be to boundary cocoa - was gazetted was R
2),85 ;
Fax: +60 Fax: angers
also need hr is there with rambutan), management
and coffee trees coffee and
-
92 Mongool
Furthermore, closed sn hand using
the - further research 88
o the to
hog field through in
- existence precise
320 cocoa,
and and 1964 is I is It ties. au Ulu Baru ¹ tool , revenue 876
forest open
- were with also held that and and . and and
of -
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ad cultivation; land Information of owners s The SocioeconomicSurvey cultivation Kg. at CUZ the of occupancy Murut predominantly Salalir resource CRP Tenom Kg. of village The areaStudy Methodology identified awareness conservation Park the inside CUZ applied be for localcommunities procedure the However, considered. be may swap, land as such options, management other CUZ, of establishment condition of zones option This CRP. the inside issues management use land address zonation unde continue to allowed be will activities human traditional where and Parks the inside occur to found are collection surroundingcommunities. 1996). (Nais, boundary Park cultivated, cont the on Based was
resettlement or resettlement
r
omnt Ue oe ( Zone Use Community executed acted to licensed surveyors. Massive discrepancies with the old boundary surfaced, with many with surfaced, boundary old the with discrepancies Massive surveyors. licensed to acted area where the local communities are engaged in cultivation and cultivation in engaged are communities local the where area ocioeconomic Kg. , district s
. which areas use community of
the crops planted crops inthe
ht hs atvte ae otold y aa Prs (Miki Parks Sabah by controlled are activities these that Hi site eeoe r vn inhabited even or developed the to about
therto
Tag new set of coordinate, the Park started ground surveying the exact and legal boundary, boundary, legal and exact the surveying ground started Park the coordinate, of set new
oig ln A sc, rdtoa cliain il be will cultivation traditional such, As Plan. Zoning other Park’s areas Park’s other
with of
w cultivated and
Mojiol r the supervision of the Parks a Parks the of supervision the r
ith ol (iv executing this land swa land this executing
right
t , the
st
amendment was an estimatedan Pr D Vlain f products; of Valuation D: Part ) survey survey Mongool n Kg. and atus quo atus i village his
td area; study et al.et ethnic areas with included
among
land , was
2016. ISSN2289 the laws oflawsthe park the . This study attempts to identify how the CUZ CUZ the how identify to attempts study This . CUZ ity . This option depends on the settlement history ( history settlement the on depends option This .
This s . Mongool Ulu Baru urve
to the initial area area initial the to The questionnaires are divided into five main sections; (i) Part Part (i) sections; main five into divided are questionnaires The , conducted a be ocpe since occupied been has Mongool h lcl communities local the and
area of area
once )
under the under Transactionson Science and Technology. has
i) at B: Part (ii) y eie a “ra wh “areas as defined
area. ok as work
- become it 8786.
187.96ha land Pensiangan Senagang was p may be complicated due to managing the balance of the the of balance the managing to due complicated be may p s established is
au Ulu Baru by CUZ area since 2004. Th 2004. since area CUZ http://transectscience.org/
accepted legal and proper the inside be to turn villagers the by
distributed epnet background; Respondent the a uthority
(Harada farmer . designated as Kinabalu as designated
main is
of Senagang
n () at : Conservation E: Part (v) and located . as the most reasonable short reasonable most the as ”
. Th source of dispute between the Park a Park the between dispute of source h Nabawan the and r eitn cliain n frs resource forest and cultivation existing ere (
et al et Apin & Miki & Apin close 1974 by a few people migrated from Kg. Kg. from migrated people few a by 1974 codn to According ere
., 2001), its ewe te odr of border the between
has been no comprehensive study comprehensive no been has and open and can inc incorporate
m contribution ome e divided be loe isd CUZ inside allowed collecting of collecting and ’s village e ,
3 2013).
(iii) Part C: Part (iii) - (1 Kiko itit Te ilgr are villagers The district. ended questionnaire ended Park ( Park by t al et - 2),85 s Kiko considering
traditional cultivation traditional In addition In 20) the (2006),
, 04. fe the After 2014). ., s located is Anonymous no settlement into - otiue to contributed
, 2006). 2006). , 92 the forest the - ,
term strategy to to strategy term
nomto on Information perception Keningau ae on based the
,
inside the inside CUZ CUZ with land , 1984). , options natural nd the the nd to to
- will and and and and is a a is
use the the the the the on A: 86
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY communityi The ConservationAwareness andC Mojiol twokindsofmay approach used of earned The EconomicValuationo forestconservati used with areas, Park awareness. revenu study on study CUZ area valuation within economiccultivatedofcrops the Local direct use value usedirect Local for subsistence purposes, the gross income will be estimated based on surrogate prices for which estimated for onprices surrogate will incomebe based gross subsistence for the purposes, o dniy the identify to i isthe involvedcosts in collectionthe productof by the local community local the by et al et ii i) ) e
generat I ., 2013) ., nterview nCUZ areas. Thesteps involvedfollow were as conservation awarenessconservation Information Prep on. Mojiol the list of list the Figure1 ed. According to Sathirathai (1998) & Mojiol & (1998) Sathirathai to According ed.
.
arationof Whereas P is the prices of prices the is P Whereas s tlzto o ln, h cmuiis aaees n their and awareness communities’ the land, of utilization
f were
et al.et Crops at CUZ
.
=
beapplied the , Map ofMap CUZ conducted
gatheringduring the
2016. ISSN2289 Net inco Net data collection data . farmers provided by the by provided farmers The
Transactionson Science and Technology. marketprice
. identifiedthe me generated for localuse generated for me
-
with thewith 8786. at Kg. MongoolUlu Senangang,Keningau http://transectscience.org/
duringpre i local com local , Qi denotes the amount of product of amount denotesthe Qi , assessment of the sold products sold theof
patterns and relationships that exist amongst localamongst exist that relationshipsand patterns i.
-
Sabah Parks Sabah assessment. munities : ,
on -
site observationssite w = ∑ {P ∑ = et al et Kg. Mongool Baru Ulu Senagang BaruUlu Mongool Kg. as who cultivated who
determined based . ., (2013) when the products the when (2013) ., w A 100% A
i as 3 Q (1
used to calculate the gross the calculate to used i -
2),85 –
C survey i
} ,
perception towards towards perception -
the land the andinterviews.
(Sathirathai, 1998;(Sathirathai, 92
i
being collected being
on sampling
the income the within the within
was
are 87 ,
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY r ra acsiiiy aalblt o ptnil akt te o the market, potential of availability accessibility, road are fortransportation, electricity and improvethe and return economic higher on concentrating are farmers More agriculture on concentrate to them encourage this jobs, good have to land - kg to found farmersthe which product 7 of average an with contributed trees 1990’s UluSenagang T Crops Contributiontothe Community Livelihood theare Therewere Resultand d conducted usingdata theanalysis The
The population The of types wo Keningau/ UluSenagang, Mongool Kg. Baru withvaluethe recorded at steps Other factors that could contribute to the species selection to be planted by the local community local the by planted be to selection species the to contributecould that factors Other numberThe VILLAGE , contributed to an average of 800 kg with estimated average income of RM9 of income average estimated with kg 800 of average an to contributed localcommun
support iii) which a as rcre t recorded also was be
of (i)and(ii)of
Tenom forty ir quality of livingofqualityir grow cultivated iscussion
crops are included the community livelihood communitythe Collaborativeandanalysis strategies.
- Mojiol s and types of typesand s
seven to growth incr growth
rubber trees surroundingthe trees rubber permanentcropsandseasonal crops
the contribute i ,
ties 000 kg per per kg 000
around the around
et al.et
RESPONDENT were of major ubr trees, rubber who respondents 47 people47 ,
2016. e ihs price highest he ISSN2289 carriedout eased v. h increased The iv). RM1
. d income
live
They need more need They crops planted are related to factors to relatedplantedare crops
to the to others outcomes Table1
community , Transactionson Science and Technology. annum 190. withinareas.the Park the tendency to grow cash crops cash grow to tendency the
commercial
cocoa of
(100%) - . socio
8786.
during
. Senagang Ulu Baru Mongool Kg. of communities local the .
n the and ii RespondentBackground . 21 to8521 years old
, ) -
. http://transectscience.org/ ’ income
and others fruiting trees as as trees fruiting others and ir s
Employment mn egt pce listed. species eight among
in
socioeconomicobse surveyand
house. housing i tnad f living of standard terviewed
AGE n crops such as rubber trees and vegetables to to vegetables and trees rubber as such crops c
estimated average income of RM36,480.00. This This RM36,480.00. of income average estimated ome
of
. Mostof crops. the Seasonal crops such as durian contributed 200 200 contributeddurian as such crops Seasonal
for for the local communities at Kg. Mongool Baru Mongool Kg. at communities local the compound. Cocoa and coffee trees coffeeand Cocoa compound.
inMongoolUlu Kg. Baru Senagang
education, -
Majority of the local community do not not do communitylocal the ofMajority Private4% Government 11% Farmers85% utcome of the final product to be be to product final the of utcome
identified as;
-
and determine the availability of availability the determine and activities The JOB purchasing goods payment purchasing and
3 were
(1 local hw in shown
- hs olwd by followed This
2),85 .
planted rvation
iii
omnte want communities i ) ). ). . -
Populationgrowth 92 M INCOME(RM) , 150.00 T 550.00
,
re demand arket able
sinceto 1980’s while(iii)
- 2. 2. 2000.00
were .
Most Rubber Rubber Cocoa . They .
gain also was
8
of to to
8 - ,
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY destruction. forest on disagree and agree equally demonstrates of conservation thePark. (96%) agreed (100%) respondents All activities and conservation. Theperception and Perceptionand ConservationAwareness Note:perIndividual* soiltypes, of charateristic physical the and community, the by owned land of size the harvested, Rubber/Getah conservation PRODUCT - Thecommunity Aoftotal - Rambutan
Cempedak
( Langsat TOTAL ( Durian kepingan were awareof prohibitionthe Kelapa CROP kentalan Koko Kopi
such terrains, Table2 *
* Thisisconsidered *
* ) Table )
ht h village the that
/
91% of theof91% as cultivation and gathering and cultivation as
the Mojiol
ofthe park Coffearobusta Cocosnucifera Coffealiberica
SCEINTIFIC
. andlocalweather conditions
3 domesticum awarenesson Theobroma brasi champeden Artocarpus lappaceum Nephelium Cropscontribut forest zibethinus , Lansium indicated NAME
Hevea Durio cacao showsthe
et al.et liensis
. respondents
They were also supportive also were They
, .
2016. ISSN2289
rs
as they as dependon thefortheir forest daily lives. their understanding importancetheir forestonof the
result f had of agree conservation
Transactionson Science and Technology. PRODUCT PRICE OF 0.50 0.80 1.00 1.50 1.20 (RM/KG) ions
of 0.50 3.00 4.50 3.80 5.80 s
aware -
– – – – – land utilization 8786. on seen the signs the seen
of Kg.ofMongool Ulu SenagangBaru of
clearing 5.80 1.70 3.00 2.00 2.80
the localcommunity’stheperception towards the
of
http://transectscience.org/ of werebased forest pro forest
preservation the Sabah Parks existence.Parksthe Sabah (Lintangah
PRODUCT BEING o arclua utilization agricultural for 800
200 200 300 COLLECTED AMOUNT OF
90 fruits 8 40 fruits40 x 13person 50 fruits50 x 4person x 2person x 9person
, for cultivation and 2 5 (KG) of 580kg of Sabah Parks bo Parks Sabah of , , 80 000 000 ducts
any
oncommunity’sthe
et al et
f hi environment their of
’s ’s ’s conservation activity conservation inside Sabah Park Sabah inside ’s
., 2009;Mojiol.,
COSTINVOLVED IN COLLECTIONIN OF PRODUCTS
3 collecting (1 undary. undary. 270.00 Theyagree
10.00 50.00 10.00 10.00 10.00 50.00 60.00 60.00 10.00 - (RM) 2),85 (
Per AnnumPer ht may that (
concerntowards 98% et al et
area area - . Ninety
92
) ., 2016).., forest
in the park the in The
and agree and the
on are lands cause INCOME )
Sabah Parks Sabah 28 50 - respondents the fact the 1 2 9 7 .
six percent percent six products
110.00 310.00 990.00 prohibited. , , , , (RM) 15.0 , , 190.00 090.00 550.00 540.00 940.00 735.00
such as as such
0 onthe .
forest forest forest
This This
that
89 in in
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY iscrops,anindication of both for cultivation income, respondents. total the of production. Twenty of H fertile. was c land
the Themainof reason initial the l 4 Table
ultivation. soil - three and and Table3
remains only shows
owever, comparing with nowadays, only nowadays, with comparing owever, percent (23%) of (23%) percent Mojiol During .
9% 8.Forest 7.Do 6.Do 5.Do 4.Do 3.Do 2.Have 1.Do Perception
the conservation awareness which awareness conservation the purpose activities? conserved? productswithin Sabah Parks? agricultural purpose andgather forest Parksboun while self
indicated cultivation indicated
et al.et you you you you you you
- the first the cultivatingmore you consumption clearing oaas 4% of 47% Nowadays,
want want tobe involvedinconservation want understandwhat conservation?is understandthe importance of forest? knowisit prohibited touse landfor knowtheexistence of Sabah Parks? 68% maycauseforest destruction. ,
everseen the signsof theSabah 2016. ISSN2289 daryorwarning boards? and DISAGREE YES your AGREE YES YES YES YES YES YES NO respon
NO NO NO NO NO NO
f epnet idctd the indicated respondents of for STATEMENT exertion Awarene
Transactionson Science and Technology.
and cultivation and
surroundings tobe agricultural
d - n suc o income. of source and ents 8786.
varietiescropscomparedofas tothe previoustime. of cultivation, 94% of the respondents agrees that the that agrees respondents the of 94% cultivation, of ss of ss LocalCommunities
for self for use http://transectscience.org/
the the
fertilizers,
had been forself hadbeen
- respondents
consumption
emphasize
30% of the respondents agree that that agree respondents the of 30%
which
etlt had fertility ih 9 o pol cliaig new cultivating people of 79% With selling selling
PERCENTAGE . There were 44% who indicated the the indicated who 44% were There .
s could KG.
on - consumption as indicated consumptionas by on
MONGOOL soil BARU ForestConservation. the result 100 100 100
96 98 96 91 49 51 3 4 2 4 9 - - -
(1
ir fertility and the purpose of purpose the and fertility
-
fall 2),85
products
in
(%) en
the increase the
-
o ite i fertile. bit little to
92
as a a as the fertility the source
of crops crops of
87 soil
90 of %
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY h cos utvtd y h lcl communities local the by cultivated crops The the and cultivation p The Conclusion and biodiversity to lowsuggest a givenenvironmentalpriority to threats as activities agricultural on disagree who respondents of leaching,erosion and and limited, fertilizers of use The Park. the within activities areas. In opulation They term of term education Table4 as the case occurred in occurred case the as
relatively agree relatively the
awareness,
Mojiol piece of land of piece s increasing is
6.Is there any difference between type of crops 5.If 4. 3.Do 2.How about nowadays, is the soilstill fertile as 1.The first time .
of ConservationAwarenessof LocalCommunities cultivated nowadays is the whatwas the reason? Whenyou before? thePark areas,was the soil fertile?
is reduces children contributed to contributed children you
you
et al.et due to the poor soil fertility of the cultivated lands. Land becomes scarce and and scarce becomes Land lands. cultivatedthe of fertility soil poor the to due
purpose are are stillactive doing cultivation, what
The use anyfertilizer for the BOTH ECONOMICSOURCE SELF BOTH ECONOMICSOURCE SELF FERTILE LITTLEBIT FERTILE NOT FERTILE FERTILE LITTLEBIT FERTILE NOT FERTILE ,
on first 2016. ISSN2289
the localcommunities that
usage of fertilizer among the community is st is community the among fertilizer of usage YES YES ? you NO NO forest felling forest with
- - started
CONSUMPTION CONSUMPTION
STATEMENT natural
Transactionson Science and Technology. Kg. Mongool Baru Ulu Senagang. The need to su toneed The Senagang.Ulu Baru Mongool Kg.
cultivate contin
and and
the shrinking amount of available land for settlement and and settlement for land available of amount shrinking the
cu - 8786.
ltivation, the fertilitysoilof (Mojiolthe u
inside ously previous your http://transectscience.org/ impact may cause forest destruction, which may which destruction, forest cause may the l the
cultivation?
cultivated show a show tha ocal community’s activities within the Park areas. Park the within activities community’s ocal
time
amongcommunitythe t
include
high levelhigh
for
emnn cos and crops permanent vegetables pineapples, paddy,
PERCENTAGE KG. on of attentivenessof et al et
MONGOOL Forest Conservation.Forest BAR
., 2010). ., Thelarge proportion 87 77 23 30 68 94 21 79 44 47 3 4 9 2 6 9 -
(1
U . -
2),85
ill at a a at ill
(%)
-
92 towardsprotected rvive for rvive low
seasonal
relate
environment level (23%). (23%). level
a to their to lead
living crops
91 to to
TRANSACTIONS ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY [13] [12] [11] [10] [9] [8] [7] [6] [5] [4] [3] [2] [1] References CrockerRange th especially assistants field and Rangers Park support, and contributions valuable Gratitude Acknowledgements exposalfo established forest the on CRP the insideissuesmanagement areas settlements. disagree respectively crops of type contri
Miki, Y., Laban, D., Maidin, N., Zainal, A. & Lakim, M. (2014). Crocker Range Park: Community Use Community Park: Range Crocker (2014). M. Lakim, & A. Zainal, N., Maidin, D., Laban, Y., Miki, Smallholdersamong in Districtthe of Ranau, Sabah. Lintanga Bandung:Palmedia Citra. (2001). K. Harada, Park Range Crocker Biodiversity the Ecosys Around and In Recommendation Dumbong Congress (2013). Y. Miki, & L Apin, Anonymous(1984). Report Series.Report Archiv 108378. Thaila of South Thani, Surat of Study Case A Resources: Natural of Conservation (1998). S. Sathirathai, ConservationProgramme inSabah (2006). K. K. Kiko, Park. National Range Conservation Crocker the Bordering Noweg HumidTropics. South (19 J. Nais, LocalCommunity. (2013).S.Y. Yong, & O. Igau,Sompud,J., R., A. Mojiol, Sustainable of Development speciesfound A.R., Mojiol, 2016),112 Malaysia. Sabah District, (2016). J. Sompud, & C. K. Contribution Liew, J., Kodoh, M., Ismenyah, J., Lintangah, J., Guntabid, R., A. Mojiol, Zone. , buted
hc has which s
is expressed is - with r further developmentr IUCNWorld Park Congress. ot Coeain rgam o Evrnetly on Socio Sound Environmentally on Programme Cooperation South
T, bu Rsi. . Ndn, . 20) Frs Plants Forest (2003). D. Nidang, & A. Rashid. Abdul T., ,
. eteet n cultivation and settlement monthly Overall, t Overall, h, W.,Mojiol, h, R., A. Kodoh, J. , .14 AG (2004). A.G. , h community The
and - the Park’s regulation Park’s the Park are 96).
129. Mojiol - f agoe oet n Socio and Forest Mangrove of 15 (ARBEC),January at dla AE, oo, . Lnagh W & aa, . (2010). R. Wahab, & W. Lintangah, J., Kodoh, A.E., Adella,
en accepted been social
ubr trees rubber burned andunburned ofareas Kliaspeat swamp fores , iaau ak n te urudn nieos Communities Indigenous Surrounding the and Park Kinabalu November
income whosacrificedtime theirenergy and during th he CUZ CUZ he
SepilokBulletin Journal
to Sabah Parks officers especially to Mr. Yassin Miki (CR Yassin especiallyMiki officersParksMr. to Sabah to tem and Conservation and tem Programme inSabah (Unpublished). Traditional people and biodiversity conservation in Gunung Halimun National Park. National Halimun Gunung in conservation biodiversity and people Traditional et al.et Parks Enactment1984. impact rce Rne ak aaeet ln Bren idvriy Ecosys Biodiversity Bornean Plan. Management Park Range Crocker cnmc auto o Mnrvs n te oe o Lcl omnte i the in Communities Local of Roles the and Mangroves of Valuation Economic ,
2016. ISSN2289 to sustain their livelihood. their sustain to Int
,
2013,Sendai, Japan, can be one of theof one be can
Community Use Zone of Crocker Range Park, Sabah Malaysia.Sabah Park, Range Crocker Communityof ZoneUse ia Rpr: h Study The Report: Final 3 agree rainl ora o Agriculture, of Journal ernational
(1),109 are on
with
s h ms raoal short reasonable most the as Transactionson Science and Technology. . However, . -
thus March2003, 1 the .JICA. ISBN 9832770114, 9789832770114. s 12 to prohibit to
- RM36,480.00 y h cmuiis ihn the within communities the by on -
8786. - 19No protected areas areas protected
betaken
115. &Solimun, M. (2010).An Assessment
the vital importance of environmental preservation but but preservation environmental of importance vital the ,
The StateThe of Sabah. http://transectscience.org/ 17 vember2014,Sydney, Australia. furthe - cnmc eeomn o Lcl omnte i Kudat in Communities Local of Development Economic (1),35
option
them from occupying the forest for cu for forest the occupying from them
intoaccount. -
SA Rve o Boiest ad Environmental and Biodiversity of Review ASEAN 18.
r research on the local communities’ dependencycommunities’local the on research r ModernApplied Science Cocoa , -
s
46
as T are
he average range of range average he for
Contributions of Kawang Forest ReserveForest the of ContributionsKawangto a
necessary
management Pr Mngmn Cmoet Bornean Component, Management Park .
RM9 oil ofit eouin n Policy and Resolution Conflict Social
- Forestry term strategy to address land use use land address to strategy term e ,
t, Beaufort, Sabaht, Malaysia. 550.00
research work.research
for s eeals o Communities for Vegetables as - area
cnmc eeomn i the in Development Economic 3 ,
(1
tool for the for tool conserving the conserving , n Plantation and ,
-
4
2),85
and omn eiia plants medicinal Common (9),58 for ofPlantationTree Activity Wrig ae N. 17). No. Paper (Working revenu
nd. N ay yea many ris RM fruits - P Manager) for his Manager) for P
-
92 65. EEPSEA ResearchEEPSEA s stationed ose e
community use use community
per annum per
ltivation and and ltivation , 1st Asia Park Asia 1st
forest. 2 s n the and rs
4,395 (February e and tem
Journal T . 00 by by he 92 at at ,