DOCSLIB.ORG

Neoliberal and Multicultural Discourses in the Development of Israeli DTT Policy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Neoliberal and Multicultural Discourses in the Development of Israeli DTT Policy Communication, Culture & Critique ISSN 1753-9129 ORIGINAL ARTICLE ‘‘Their Deeds are the Deeds of Zimri; but They Expect a Reward Like Phineas’’: Neoliberal and Multicultural Discourses in the Development of Israeli DTT Policy Roei Davidson1 &AmitM.Schejter2 1 Department of Communication, University of Haifa, Mount Carmel, Haifa 31905, Israel 2 College of Communications, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802-5101, USA We examine how neoliberal and multicultural discourses were employed in the development of digital terrestrial television (DTT) policy in Israel as a case study of the deployment of media technology in a society that is characterized by deep social cleavages and rapid neoliberalization. We conduct a detailed analysis of official documents published over 6 years, including preparatory work, draft bills, parliamentary committee minutes, parliamentary plenary discussions, and the wording of the law enacted in February 2008. This study highlights how neoliberal multiculturalism operates as rhetoric that champions the cultural and economic rights of minorities, while masking policy stances that negate these rights. We demonstrate how this is linked to the composition of the channels eventually included on the DTT platform. doi:10.1111/j.1753-9137.2010.01089.x The transition to digital terrestrial television (DTT) broadcasting has been taking place worldwide since the mid-1990s. The technology enables the transmission of more channels than analog technology on a given portion of the spectrum. Picture quality is usually better, and the signal can include an Electronic Program Guide (EPG) and can also be encrypted. As Picard (2007) notes, more than in many other areas of broadcast regulation, the transition to digital television has taken on different formats in different countries and has been subject to very little, if any, transnational coordination of policy. In this study, we examine the forces that have shaped the development of DTT policy in Israel. We consider the discursive role of neoliberalism and multiculturalism, the emergence of a ‘‘neolibral-multicultural’’ discourse, and the structural role of clientelism in shaping this policy domain. We do so based on a detailed analysis of official documents published over 6 years, which include preparatory work, draft Corresponding author: Roei Davidson; e-mail: [email protected] Note: The authors contributed equally to this article. Communication, Culture & Critique 4 (2011) 1–22 © 2011 International Communication Association 1 Neoliberal and Multicultural Discourses R. Davidson & A. M. Schejter bills, Knesset committee minutes, Knesset plenary discussions, and the wording of the eventual law, which was enacted in February 2008. We argue that the uses of neoliberalism and the abuses of multicultural discourse through clientelist networks culminate in a DTT policy that misses an opportunity to enable television to play a progressive role in restructuring the Israeli public sphere. We thus aim to make a contribution to the understanding of the paradoxical role neoliberal discourses play in media policy debates. This study is the first analysis of DTT policy in Israel. It adds to a growing critical-historical literature on the transitions in Israeli media, which have been published in recent years and have focused mostly on existing electronic media—namely, analog television and radio (i.e., Schejter, 2009; Caspi & Limor, 1999; Liebes, 2003; Yuran, 2001). We begin with a historical background of Israeli society and continue with a brief discussion of neoliberalism, multiculturalism, and clientelism. Following a brief description of the Israeli media scene and the context of transition to DTT, we present an analysis of the policy process and a theoretical discussion of that process. Historical background: Israel and Israeli society Israel is a parliamentary democracy carved in 1948 out of the former British colony of Palestine. Its social fabric is a display of two parallel yet distinct social rifts: among Jews, and between Jews and Arabs. During the 1950s, a Jewish population of only 600,000, mostly of European (‘‘Ashkenazi’’) descent, absorbed more than 1 million Jewish immigrants, mainly from North Africa and Iraq (‘‘Mizrahi’’); in the 1990s, more than 1 million predominantly Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet republics found their way to Israel; and, in between, waves of Jewish immigration from scores of nations made Israel their new home. Immigrant absorption was guided in the state’s formative years by a ‘‘Jewish melting pot’’ model, but in the latter decades of the 20th century this model gradually lost its authority as the state has become home to ‘‘different dreams and often opposing aspirations’’ among its Jewish majority (Zameret, 2002, p. 156), serving as the backdrop for much of the social tension among Jewish Israelis over the years. As an outcome of wars that took place in 1948 and 1967, Israel dominates a large Arab minority. It is indisputable that the Arab citizens of Israel, many of whom have assumed a Palestinian identity and align themselves with a yet-to-be-formed Arab state, which was also envisioned in 1948, are economically and socially removed from positions of power in Israeli society and are systematically discriminated against (Hasson & Karayanni, 2006). Since its foundation, the Israeli political economy has undergone significant transformations. Following the 1967 war, it developed a military–industrial complex, which later morphed into a flourishing civil technology sector (Swirski, 2005), changing it from a ‘‘developing country to [a] post industrial country’’ (Sharkansky, 1987). These social rifts on the one hand and ideological transformations on the other have allowed for the development of a policy discourse rooted in three themes: neoliberalism, multiculturalism, and clientelism. 2 Communication, Culture & Critique 4 (2011) 1–22 © 2011 International Communication Association R. Davidson & A. M. Schejter Neoliberal and Multicultural Discourses The theoretical framework Neoliberalism Neoliberalism is a political-economic ideology that has been deployed to varying degrees in many developed economies from the 1980s onwards. It suggests that ‘‘human well-being can best be advanced by liberating individual entrepreneurial freedoms and skills within an institutional framework characterized by strong private property rights, free markets, and free trade’’ (Harvey, 2005, p. 2; see also Clarke, 2004; Frow, 1999). Government, according to this approach, has an important role in shaping and enforcing the regulations needed to safeguard private property, commercial markets, and free trade but should shy away from participating in the market directly and step aside from the provision of social services. Markets rather than governments are presented as the purest expression of popular will (Frank, 2000). Israeli policymakers too have adopted a neoliberal agenda and argued for a move away from statist intervention toward more reliance on market forces (Ben Bassat, 2002). This transition from a social democratic state to a neoliberal nationalistic state is characterized by a new form of centralization that is dictated by wealthy individuals and corporations and is designed to benefit them and the state equally while excluding a large proportion of the population (see, e.g., Aronoff, 2001; Nitzan & Bichler, 2007; Yuran, 2003). In the telcommunications sector this change was reflected by a weakening of the national public broadcaster; by the corporatization and eventual privatization of the national telecommunications provider, Bezeq, and the introduction of privately owned mobile and fixed telephony providers; by the launch of commercial television in 1993, with a second channel added in 2002; and by the licensing of multichannel cable and satellite television in 1989 and 1999, respectively. Neoliberalism is also characterized by a disjuncture between the rhetorical cham- pioning of governmental minimalism and the reality of continuous governmental intervention to selectively protect certain rights for certain corporate actors, present- ing their protected right as reflective of ‘‘natural’’ economic law (Shenhav, 2006). This ideological aspect will be further demonstrated in the analysis of DTT policy that follows. Multiculturalism Multiculturalism as an intellectual approach can be seen as a reaction to the monocultural politics evident throughout the history of modern Western societies. Monoculturalism attempted to universalize one particular culture (often Western and middle class), through education and cultural policies, while denying that cultural creations produced by others count as ‘‘real’’ culture (Goldberg, 1994). In reaction to early attempts at challenging monoculturalism, evident in the 1960s in the civil rights movement in the United States and in the student movements in America and Europe, integrative policies were instituted that allowed social groups Communication, Culture & Critique 4 (2011) 1–22 © 2011 International Communication Association 3 Neoliberal and Multicultural Discourses R. Davidson & A. M. Schejter to retain their particular culture as minorities on the margins. However, full-fledged multiculturalism requires the provision of egalitarian expressive opportunities for all relevant cultures active in a defined social domain, and demands not just tolerance of ‘‘other’’ cultures by one hegemonic culture, but rather policies that enable the flourishing of all cultures in constant dialogue
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Su-Re Sjsira
    . .................................... ' P - ■ Dora3n's bid A ^ s; i i n g e r V. :story, ^ ^ | |_ 4 o i ^ Nslo. 1 - B31 h e r g ^ ^ S' ^nQQ^ l i ¥ T ¥ £ l ( 25^ ^ 78th1 y ear. No. 168 Twfin Falls. IdaiJaho FFriday. June 17.1983 s 1 * . * 1 1 * - C? * ^ ^ a » esU-Re^ p a y 4 i current economic clim ate in —By W ESI^VG, PIPPERT.IT--, ____ ^ .TThere h also should be a fombrmal national to cach of the approxlm aldy 00,000.),surviving_ si review or_anyany prot>atlve evidence agal[alnst could paM in the c i ^ United Press latemotloua}al apolctology for the “grave Injustice"Ice" done lo the pcr»ns exdudedc from their homesies on the them , w ere excexcluded, removed and eictaiiained Conpxjss. themem. W cstC oasast." by the UnitedBd iStates during Worid Warr 11."I "W e a re developinoping a ttwught that unless _ — -wasfnNGTON-=-A-f«-federal-commlssion --------“iTlo-not-conslder-it-to-be-gii“ 1- r-guiit-money;^'-— -It-also-ij-said-Congress-should sel•I iaside-$&— thecommlssion —:------somethlng-has-mon'Tioney-altadTed-lo-it^'ony^^^-^^— ^ recom m ended H iursday’ thithe govemmenl pay comimmission Chairman Joan BeBcmstcin told million tolo be used for Aleuts evacuatjn t^ .Iro m luded people suffered cnormtmous action tak en by govegovemmenl or privale indi- . ll.S bUUon In compcnsatloiillon to the surviving repoip orters. "1 consider it to be aI rresponse e in the thc Aleutijtian or Pribilof Islands dui d losses, bolh material and intntan- vldualsisofnouse."!c." I.Amdgren lolti reporters, 60.000 Japanese-A m eriansfis vwho w ere Interned u suual a m anner In our society foror ta w rong that w ar, andI a paym ent of $5,000 lo each ol d.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service Television in a Multi-Platform Environment
    volume 03 issue 06/2014 PUBLIC SERVICE TELEVISION IN A MULTI-PLATFORM ENVIRONMENT A COMPARATIVE STUDY IN FINLAND AND ISRAEL Oranit Klein-Shagrir Department of Sociology, Political Science and Communication The Open University of Israel P.O. Box 808, Raanana, 4353701 Israel [email protected] Heidi Keinonen Turku Institute for Advanced Studies Media Studies 22014 University of Turku Finland [email protected] Abstract: Cultural and economic transformations have encouraged television companies to turn their attention to multi-platform practices so as to increase their compatibility with the changing media environment. While digital media provide public service broadcasting (PSB) institutions with new opportunities for meeting their public commitments and maintaining their relevance in national media systems, PSB is also faced with additional challenges. One of these is the tension between public service values on the one hand and digital technologies and practices on the other. In this article we discuss how Finnish and Israeli PSB managers and producers perceive the opportunities and challenges of multi-platform production. In both countries public service broadcasting is striving for public legitimacy and relevance in a changing technological environment. However, the two countries currently find themselves at quite different stages: Israel has a struggling public service agency, while Finland boasts a strong broadcasting company. Keywords: multi-platform television, public service television, interactivity, television production, PSB values, Israeli television, Finnish television 1 Introduction Over the last two decades, the rise of digital media has brought about dramatic changes to the media environment. To name just one, broadcast television has been affected by technological transformations such as digitisation, which 14 Oranit Klein-Shagrir and Heidi Keinonen, Public Service Television in a Multi-Platform Environment enables media convergence and the flow of content across multiple media platforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Israeli Media Self-Censorship During the Second Lebanon War
    conflict & communication online, Vol. 18, No. 2, 2019 www.cco.regener-online.de ISSN 1618-0747 Sagi Elbaz & Daniel Bar-Tal Voluntary silence: Israeli media self-censorship during the Second Lebanon War Kurzfassung: Dieser Artikel beschreibt die Charakteristika der Selbstzensur im Allgemeinen, und insbesondere in den Massenmedien, im Hinblick auf Erzählungen von politischer Gewalt, einschließlich Motivation und Auswirkungen von Selbstzensur. Es präsentiert zunächst eine breite theoretische Konzeptualisierung der Selbstzensur und konzentriert sich dann auf seine mediale Praxis. Als Fallstudie wurde die Darstellung des Zweiten Libanonkrieges in den israelischen Medien untersucht. Um Selbstzensur als einen der Gründe für die Dominanz hegemonialer Erzählungen in den Medien zu untersuchen, führten die Autoren Inhaltsanalysen und Tiefeninterviews mit ehemaligen und aktuellen Journalisten durch. Die Ergebnisse der Analysen zeigen, dass israelische Journalisten die Selbstzensur weitverbreitet einsetzen, ihre Motivation, sie zu praktizieren, und die Auswirkungen ihrer Anwendung auf die Gesellschaft. Abstract: This article describes the characteristics of self-censorship in general, specifically in mass media, with regard to narratives of political violence, including motivations for and effects of practicing self-censorship. It first presents a broad theoretical conceptualization of self-censorship, and then focuses on its practice in media. The case study examined the representation of The Second Lebanon War in the Israeli national media. The authors carried out content analysis and in-depth interviews with former and current journalists in order to investigate one of the reasons for the dominance of the hegemonic narrative in the media – namely, self-censorship. Indeed, the analysis revealed widespread use of self-censorship by Israeli journalists, their motivations for practicing it, and the effects of its use on the society.
    [Show full text]
  • Ereralregister
    ^ O N A L ^ ^ % Av I MANET I \f* ERERAL * s ^ XcQjP ^ ^ REGISTER VOLUME 20 ' V / J 9 3 4 NUMBER 238 O N i T t O ^ Washington, Thursday, December 8, 1955 TITLE 16— COMMERCIAL became, pursuant to § 3.21 of tHe rules CONTENTS of practice, tHe “Decision of tHe Com­ PRACTICES mission”. Agricultural Marketing Service Pa8® THe order to cease and desist is as Proposed rule making: Chapter I— Federal Trade Commission follows: U. S. standards: . [Docket 6384] I t is ordered, THat respondents Novel Cherries, sweet _________ 9017 Mfg. & Distributing Co., Inc., a corpora­ Grapefruit juice, deHydrated- 9020 Part 13—D igest of Cease and D esist tion, and its officers, and Sam Weitz and Orange juice, canned________ 9018 O rders RicHard WeitH, individually and as offi­ Agriculture Department NOVEL MFG. & DISTRIBUTING CO., INC., ET AL. cers of said corporation, and Russell See Agricultural Marketing Serv­ WeitH, individually and as general man­ ice; Commodity Stabilization Subpart—Advertising falsely or mis­ ager of said corporation, and respond­ Service ; Rural Electrification leadingly: § 13.125 Limited offers or sup­ Administration. ents’ representatives, agents and em­ ply; § 13.135 Nature: Product or service; Business and Defense Services § 13.155 Prices: Usual as reduced, special, ployees, directly or tHrougH any corpo­ etc. Subpart—:Misrepresenting oneself rate or otHer device, in connection witH Administration and goods—Goods: § 13.1685 Nature: tHe offering for sale, sale or distribution Rules and regulations: [Misrepresenting oneself and goods] — in commerce, as “commerce” is defined Titanium mill products; limita­ Prices: § 13.1825 Usual as reduced or to in tHe Federal Trade Commission Act, tions on required acceptance of rated orders______________ 9008 l)e increased.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Annual Report
    Dear Friends We are proud to present you with NATAL's 2016 Annual Report. This report covers all activities over the last year within every unit, including relevant data, trends, special events and more. It is a great opportunity for us to extend our thanks to all of NATAL's staff, therapists, and volunteers who have all done some very impressive work and continue to exhibit great professionalism and commitment to NATAL's mission. Over the past year the wave of terror attacks which began as indiscriminate stabbings across the country grew to include two serious shootings in central Tel Aviv and claimed the lives of many civilians, while simultaneously leaving many more wounded both in body and soul. During these times NATAL operated within its emergency mode, with the Helpline operating 24/7 in order to answer the great influx of callers seeking support. At the same time we unveiled NATAL's new online chat service which similar to the Helpline, is operated by a group of dedicated and trained volunteers. This year NATAL established its first Public Advisory Board, led by former IDF Chief of Staff, Major General (Res) Benny Gantz. The board includes prominent Israeli public figures, artists, journalists and representatives of students and youth in Israel. The purpose of the Public Advisory Board is to accompany NATAL as it continues to fulfill its mission within Israeli society, to help and raise awareness about the issue of trauma due to terror and war, and to support NATAL's position as a leading professional knowledge center in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodic Report As the Group Or the Bezeq Group
    Chapter A – Description of Corporation’s Operations In this report, which contains a description of the Corporation’s business operations as at December 31, 2008, the Company has included forward-looking information, as defined in the Securities Law 5728-1968 (the Securities Law). Such information includes forecasts, targets, appraisals and assessments which apply to future events or matters the realization of which is not certain and is not under the Corporation’s control. Forward-looking information in this report will usually be identified specifically, or by employing statements such as “the Company expects”, “the Company assesses”, “it is the Company’s intention”, and similar statements. Forward-looking information is not a proven fact and is based only on the Company’s subjective assessment, based, inter alia, on a general analysis of the information available at the time of drafting of this report, including public announcements, studies and surveys, and they contain no undertakings as to the correctness or completeness of the information contained therein, and the Corporation does not independently check the correctness thereof. The Company’s assessments vary from time to time, depending on circumstances. In addition, the realization and/or otherwise of the forward-looking information will be affected by factors that cannot be assessed in advance, and which are not within the control of the Company, including the risk factors that are characteristic of its operations as set out in this report, and developments in the general environment, and external factors and the regulation that affects the Company’s operations, as set out in this report. Bezeq The Israel Telecommunication Corporation Limited (the Company or Bezeq) along with the subsidiaries that it owns in whole or in part, whose financial statements are consolidated with the Company's, shall be jointly referred to in this periodic report as the Group or the Bezeq Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Multiple Documents
    Alex Morgan et al v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc., Docket No. 2_19-cv-01717 (C.D. Cal. Mar 08, 2019), Court Docket Multiple Documents Part Description 1 3 pages 2 Memorandum Defendant's Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support of i 3 Exhibit Defendant's Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of La 4 Declaration Gulati Declaration 5 Exhibit 1 to Gulati Declaration - Britanica World Cup 6 Exhibit 2 - to Gulati Declaration - 2010 MWC Television Audience Report 7 Exhibit 3 to Gulati Declaration - 2014 MWC Television Audience Report Alex Morgan et al v. United States Soccer Federation, Inc., Docket No. 2_19-cv-01717 (C.D. Cal. Mar 08, 2019), Court Docket 8 Exhibit 4 to Gulati Declaration - 2018 MWC Television Audience Report 9 Exhibit 5 to Gulati Declaration - 2011 WWC TElevision Audience Report 10 Exhibit 6 to Gulati Declaration - 2015 WWC Television Audience Report 11 Exhibit 7 to Gulati Declaration - 2019 WWC Television Audience Report 12 Exhibit 8 to Gulati Declaration - 2010 Prize Money Memorandum 13 Exhibit 9 to Gulati Declaration - 2011 Prize Money Memorandum 14 Exhibit 10 to Gulati Declaration - 2014 Prize Money Memorandum 15 Exhibit 11 to Gulati Declaration - 2015 Prize Money Memorandum 16 Exhibit 12 to Gulati Declaration - 2019 Prize Money Memorandum 17 Exhibit 13 to Gulati Declaration - 3-19-13 MOU 18 Exhibit 14 to Gulati Declaration - 11-1-12 WNTPA Proposal 19 Exhibit 15 to Gulati Declaration - 12-4-12 Gleason Email Financial Proposal 20 Exhibit 15a to Gulati Declaration - 12-3-12 USSF Proposed financial Terms 21 Exhibit 16 to Gulati Declaration - Gleason 2005-2011 Revenue 22 Declaration Tom King Declaration 23 Exhibit 1 to King Declaration - Men's CBA 24 Exhibit 2 to King Declaration - Stolzenbach to Levinstein Email 25 Exhibit 3 to King Declaration - 2005 WNT CBA Alex Morgan et al v.
    [Show full text]
  • ATT July16 Layout.Indd
    The AT&T contracts with programmers for the content displayed on U-verse TV service periodically expire, or may be terminated, but are usually re-negotiated or extended with no interruption or change for our U-verse members. Additionally, from time to time it is necessary to change channel line-ups as well as television package contents. The programming changes set forth below may occur as follows: July 2019 As previously noticed, the AT&T contract with the programmer for the following channels is set to expire. While these channels will continue to be available to U-verse members so long as AT&T has the rights to carry them, if a reasonable agreement cannot be reached with the programmer the programming will no longer be available. AT&T may modify the channel location for the programming by moving them from their current channel location to a channel between 9501 – 9599, and if a reasonable longer term agreement cannot be reached with the programmers, we may lose the rights to carry them (listed in alphabetical order) on or after July 2019: Family Entertainment TV (channel 578); EVINE Live and EVINE Live in HD; Heroes & Icons (channel 137 and 1137 in HD); MBC America (channel 3643); MeTV (channel 23, 136 and 1023 and 1136 in HD). As well as the following: 1) Atlanta, GA area, WUPA (channel 69 and 1069 in HD); 2) August, GA area, WJBF (channel 6 and 1006 in HD); 3) Austin, TX area, KXAN (channel 4 and 1004 in HD), KBVO (channel 7 and 1007 in HD), KNVA (channel 12 and 1012 in HD); 4) Bakersfi eld, CA area, KKEY (channel 11 and 3007 in HD),
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Satellite & Satellite Systems Europe Africa & Middle East Asia
    Foreign Satellite & Satellite Systems Europe Africa & Middle East Albania, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bosnia & Algeria, Angola, Benin, Burkina Faso, Cameroon, Herzegonia, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, Congo Brazzaville, Congo Kinshasa, Egypt, France, Germany, Gibraltar, Greece, Hungary, Ethiopia, Gabon, Ghana, Ivory Coast, Kenya, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Macedonia, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Moldova, Montenegro, The Netherlands, Norway, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Serbia, Somalia, South Africa, Sudan, Tanzania, Tunisia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Uganda, Western Sahara, Zambia. Armenia, Ukraine, United Kingdom. Azerbaijan, Bahrain, Cyprus, Georgia, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen. Asia & Pacific North & South America Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, Canada, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Kazakhstan, Honduras, Jamaica, Mexico, Puerto Rico, United Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Macau, Maldives, Myanmar, States of America. Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Nepal, Pakistan, Phillipines, South Korea, Chile, Columbia, Ecuador, Paraguay, Peru, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Tajikistan, Thailand, Uruguay, Venezuela. Uzbekistan, Vietnam. Australia, French Polynesia, New Zealand. EUROPE Albania Austria Belarus Belgium Bosnia & Herzegovina Bulgaria Croatia Czech Republic France Germany Gibraltar Greece Hungary Iceland Ireland Italy
    [Show full text]
  • Asia Expat TV Complete Channel List
    Asia Expat TV Complete Channel List Australia FOX Sport 502 FOX LEAGUE HD Australia FOX Sport 504 FOX FOOTY HD Australia 10 Bold Australia SBS HD Australia SBS Viceland Australia 7 HD Australia 7 TV Australia 7 TWO Australia 7 Flix Australia 7 MATE Australia NITV HD Australia 9 HD Australia TEN HD Australia 9Gem HD Australia 9Go HD Australia 9Life HD Australia Racing TV Australia Sky Racing 1 Australia Sky Racing 2 Australia Fetch TV Australia Live 1 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 2 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 3 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 4 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 5 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 6 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 7 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 8 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia AFL Live 9 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 1 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 2 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 3 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 4 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia Live 5 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 6 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 7 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 8 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Live 9 HD (Live During Events Only) Australia NRL Rugby League 1 HD (Only During Live Games) Australia NRL Rugby League 2 HD (Only During Live Games) Australia NRL Rugby League 3 HD (Only During Live Games) Australia VIP NZ: TVNZ 1HD Australia VIP NZ: TVNZ 2HD Australia
    [Show full text]
  • Arabic Global 59
    ARABIC GLOBAL 59. AL HAYAT CINEMA 120. BAHRAIN SPORT 1 180. AL RASHEED 60. AL NAHAR TV 121. BAHRAIN SPORT 2 181. AL GHADEER 1. AL JAZEERA ARABIC 61. AL HAYAT SPORT 122. BAHRAIN 55 182. AL QETHARA 2. AL JAZEERA ENGLISH 62. AL HAYAT MUSLSALAT 123. BAHRAIN TV 183. OMANN SPORT 3. AL JAZEERA MASR 63. AL HAYAT SERIES 124. ORIENT 184. ALMERGAB 2 4. AL JAZEERA MUBASHER 64. IMAGINE MOVIES 125. AGHAPY 185. TUNISIA TV 5. MBC 1 65. RUSSIA AL YAUM 126. DUBAI TV 186. TUNISIE TELEVISION 6. MBC WANASAH 66. DW TV ARABIC 127. MAEEN 187. MISRATA 7. MBC 4 67. EURO NEWS ARABIC 128. HAMASAT 188. OMAN TV 8. MBC ACTION 68. FUTURE INTERNATIONAL 129. MADANI 189. OMAN TV2 9. MBC MAX 69. FUTURE USA 130. MTV LEBANON 190. SAWSAN TV 10. MBC DRAMA 70. SYRIA SATELLITE 131. NOURSAT AL SHABAB 191. LIBYA AL HURRA 11. MBC MAGHREB 71. CNBC ARABIYAH 132. AL MASRAWIA 192. TOP MOVIES TV 12. MBC 3 72. MBC MASR 133. ABU DHABI DRAMA 2 193. AL HAQEQA 13. MBC PERSIA 73. PANORAMA DRAMA 2 134. AL ANWAR 194. ALL TV 14. MBC 2 74. CRT DRAMA 135. AL MANAR 195. AL LUBNANIA 15. ROTANA CINEMA 75. PANORAMA FILM 136. AL EKHBARIA 196. TAWAZON 16. ROTANA KHALIJIAH 76. PANORAMA DRAMA 137. CORAN TV 197. KIRKUK TV 17. ROTANA MUSIC 77. AL ARABIYAH AL HADATH 138. TELE LIBAN 198. AL FATH 18. ROTANA CLIP 78. AL ALARABIYA 139. AL YAWM PALESTINE 199. FM TV 19. ROTANA MASRIYA 79. FADAK TV 140. BEDAYA 200.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC), October 14-31, 2019
    Description of document: All Broadcasting and Mass Media Informal Complaints received by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), October 14-31, 2019 Requested date: 01-November-2019 Release date: 26-November-2019-2019 Posted date: 27-July-2020 Source of document: Freedom of Information Act Request Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, S.W., Room 1-A836 Washington, D.C. 20554 The governmentattic.org web site (“the site”) is a First Amendment free speech web site, and is noncommercial and free to the public. The site and materials made available on the site, such as this file, are for reference only. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals have made every effort to make this information as complete and as accurate as possible, however, there may be mistakes and omissions, both typographical and in content. The governmentattic.org web site and its principals shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to any loss or damage caused, or alleged to have been caused, directly or indirectly, by the information provided on the governmentattic.org web site or in this file. The public records published on the site were obtained from government agencies using proper legal channels. Each document is identified as to the source. Any concerns about the contents of the site should be directed to the agency originating the document in question. GovernmentAttic.org is not responsible for the contents of documents published on the website. Federal Communications Commission Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau Washington, D.C. 20554 tfltJ:J November 26, 2019 FOIA Nos.
    [Show full text]