National Capital Region Urban Infrastructure Financing Facility-Project 1

Social Monitoring Report

Semestral Report January - June 2013

IND: National Capital Region Urban Infrastructure Financing Facility-Project 1

Prepared for the National Capital Region Planning Board and the Asian Development Bank.

This social monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature.

In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area.

Social Monitoring Report

Loan Number: 2660 IND Reporting Period: (Jan – June 2013)

INDIA: National Capital Region Urban Infrastructure Financing Facility

Prepared by: Executing Agency: National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB)

December 2013 New Delhi

ABBREVIATIONS

ADB - Asian Development Bank CC - Construction Contractor CFE - Consent for Establishment DIMTS - Delhi Integration Multimodal Transit Service DPCC - Delhi Pollution Control Committee DP - Displaced Persons DPR - Detailed Project Report EA - Executing Agency EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment ESMC - Environmental & Social Management Cell ESMS - Environmental & Social Management System GoI - Government of India HSPCB - Haryana State Pollution Control Board IA - Implementing Agency IEE - Initial Environmental Examination IP - Indigenous People IR - Involuntary Resettlement LA - Land Acquisition MFF - Multi-tranche Financing Facility NCR - National Capital Region NCRPB - National Capital Region Planning Board NGO - Non Government Organization OCR - Ordinary Capital Resources PFR - Periodic Financing Request PHED - Public Health Engineering Department PMC - Program Management Consultant PMU - Program Management Unit PPTA - Project Preparatory Technical Assistance RP - Resettlement Plan R&R - Resettlement and Rehabilitation

i Table of Contents

I. SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT 4 A. Executive Summary 4 B. The Project - NCRUIFF 4 C. NCRPB’s Environmental & Social Management System 6 D. Background of the Monitoring Report 7 E. Scope of Land Acquisition & Involuntary Resettlement Impacts 9 F. Status of Resettlement Plans Implementation 12 1. Subprojects in Implementation/Construction 13 i. Badli Bypass – 5.70 Km 15 ii. Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District 22 iii. Development of Roads in Sonepat District 27 2. Subprojects in Preparation/Bidding 30 G. Lessons Learned and Follow Up Actions 31

List of Tables

Table 1: NCRPB ESMS Social Categorization ...... 7 Table 2: First Tranche Subprojects (PFR1 Indicative List) ...... 8 Table 3: Scope of Land Acquisition ...... 9 Table 4: Subproject - Badli Bypass ...... 13 Table 5: Subproject - Badli Bypass Compliance Status of RP implementation ...... 15 Table 6: Subproject - Badli Bypass Resettlement costs ...... 17 Table 7. Summary Table of Resettlement Progress – Badli Bypass ...... 19 Table 8: Subproject – Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District ...... 20 Table 9: Comparison between the initial RP and the revised RP ...... 22 Table 10: Summary of Resettlement Impacts - Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District ...... 23 Table 11 : Summary Table of Resettlement Progress – Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District ...... 24 Table 12: Subproject – Development of Roads in Sonepat District ...... 25 Table 13. Summary Table of Resettlement Progress – Subproject: Development of Roads in Sonepat District ...... 29 Table 14: Status of the upcoming subprojects ...... 30 Table 15: Compliance status of the subprojects under implementation ...... 31

ii Annexure

Annexure 1: Details of DPs under Badli Bypass Road

Annexure 2: Details of Acquired Land and compensation paid in Badli Bypass

Annexure 3: Detailed valuation of affected Structure and trees in Badli Bypass

Annexure 4: Evidence for Payment made to DPs as compensation of acquired land under Badli Bypass

Annexure 5: Evidence for payment of compensation as assistances paid to DPs of Badli Bypass

Annexure 6: Details of DPs under Jhajjar Bypass Road

iii I. SOCIAL MONITORING REPORT

A. Executive Summary

1. This report covers the period of January – June 2013 and all available updates regarding social safeguards and compliance to ADB’s safeguards policy. The report is based on the documents submitted by the Implementing Agencies. This report presents the background of The National Capital Region Urban Infrastructure Financing Facility (NCRUIFF) followed by the structure and principles of environment and social management system that has been adopted for implementation and monitoring of safeguards issues. The implementation status of resettlement plans and emerging issues have been presented in every possible detail. Finally the report analyses the gaps and dwells on the necessary actions to deal with such issues.

Currently three road subprojects are under various stages of implementation. Out of them in two subprojects, unanticipated land acquisition has been reported to National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB). These three subprojects were earlier categorized as S21 i.e. with limited impacts. It has been assessed that even after considering unanticipated land acquisition (for 2 sub-projects) the categorization will continue to be S2. NCRPB has taken necessary actions to deal with these developments of unanticipated land acquisition and has already requested the Implementing Agencies to revise resettlement plans to capture and mitigate the unanticipated impacts due to land acquisition. Social impact assessment and preparation / revision of Resettlement Plans are being carried out by the concerned Implementing Agencies. Three new road sub-projects were approved by PSMG in Dec 2012 under NCRUIFF Tranche 1. All these subprojects have been categorized under S2 category due to limited impacts. Short Resettlement Plans were prepared by HSRDC through some consultants but the quality of reports was not found satisfactory. As such it was decided that PMC NCRPB will prepare the SRPs and necessary data will be provided by IAs. Simultaneously the implementing agency HSRDC started land acquisition process. 2. The tranche 1 NCRUIFF also included three sub projects, Pataudi water supply, Nuh water supply and Sonepat drainage of PHED Haryana. These sub projects are also under category S2. The implementing agency Haryana PHED prepared SRP for Pataudi and Nuh water supply scheme but quality being unsatisfactory, NCRPB advised PMC to prepare SRPs of all three sub projects of Haryana PHED. PHED initiated land acquisition process on Pataudi and Nuh schemes.

B. The Project - NCRUIFF

3. The National Capital Region Urban Infrastructure Financing Facility (NCRUIFF) is being funded by the Asian Development Bank. The impact of NCRUIFF is to improve overall quality of life and economic well-being of urban residents in India's NCR. The outcomes of NCRUIFF are improved economic growth support and public and environmental urban infrastructure services in the participating cities and/or sub regions of the NCR in accordance with the Regional Plan priorities. To this effect, NCRUIFF will support NCRPB in (i) leveraging its resources through a line of credit and other market access support services, and (ii) support a project development facility that would focus on design, implementation and delivery of quality growth oriented and public and environmental urban services and support capacity enhancements as well.

1 S2 category of NCRPB - ≤ 200 APs in Plain areas and ≤ 100 APs in tribal / hilly areas which is similar to ADB’s categorization of ‘IR category B’.

4. There are three broad outputs of this project: (i) NCRUIFF would support creation of high quality urban public and environmental infrastructure. This would include water supply, sanitation and waste management projects including possible regional initiatives. (ii) to foster economic growth and mobility, NCRUIFF will support creation of connectivity and/or up- gradation of transit infrastructure in the region. (iii) Implementation support for strengthening of NCRPB and participating implementation agencies' capacity to design and execute high quality urban infrastructure project, and other capacity development activities including enabling public-private partnerships.

5. The Facility is being provided to NCRPB in line with the provisions of the Multi tranche Financing Facility (MFF) modality of the ADB. Besides physical infrastructure, facility also supports NCRPB's institutional transformation in line with the evolving infrastructure and financial sector reforms. The total estimated project cost is US$ 200 million, of which 75% of the financial assistance is provided by ADB (i.e. US$ 150 million) from its ordinary capital resources (OCR) and the remaining is to be contributed by NCRPB and its sub borrowers.

6. The first Periodic Financing Request (PFR1), amounting to US$78 million, was approved on 18 August 2010. The Guarantee and Loan Agreements for PFR1 were signed on 17 March 2011 and the loan was declared effective from 29 June 20112.

7. The Facility supports subprojects that are located in and/or that assist the National Capital Region and the notified counter magnet areas. The sub-borrowers comprise local (sub-national) authorities/ governments, urban development authorities, statutory bodies set up by the state governments, the utility boards or corporations and special purpose vehicles sponsored by the above. The subprojects, among others, may include following subsectors:

(i) Water supply (ii) Waste water treatment and drainage (iii) Waste management (Municipal and Industrial) (iv) Urban transport, multimodal terminals and regional transport and connectivity (v) Slum development (vi) Other economic growth infrastructure like industrial estates, social infrastructure (vii) Capacity building and institutional development

8. Implementation Arrangements. The Executing Agency (EA) for the Facility is the National Capital Region Planning Board (NCRPB). Project Management Unit (PMU) of NCRPB will monitor the screening and selection of qualified subprojects, and monitoring their day-to-day implementation by sub borrower. The PMU will ensure that all qualified subprojects are in compliance with the ESMS, applicable national and state policies relating to environment, resettlement, and indigenous peoples, and ADB's Safeguard Policy Statement, 2009. Under the overall authority of the Member Secretary, NCRPB, the project management responsibility will be with the Director (Administration and Finance). The PMU headed by the Director will manage, and coordinate all project activities. Assistant Director – Safeguards, in PMU is directly responsible for implementation of ESMS.

9. Implementing Agency. The sub-projects are implemented by respective implementation units of the concerned departments of the participating NCR states and/or sub-borrowers in NCR. The implementing agency, where necessary, engages Design/Supervision and/or Project Management consultants for preparation, procurement,

2 AIDE-MEMOÍRE OF LOAN REVIEW MISSION FOR L2660-IND: NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION URBAN INFRASTRUCTURE FINANCING FACILITY-PROJECT 1 (16 to 19 September 2012)

5 construction, supervision and management of the subprojects. The consultant will also support in preparation and implementation of Resettlement Plans

10. Implementing Agency, with the assistance of Design Consultant, prepares resettlement planning and RP implementation as well as obtains the necessary government clearances/approvals. Project Management Unit (PMU) of NCRPB will review and approve RPs, with assistance of Project Management Consultants (PMC), oversee compliance with ESMS, loan covenants and subproject selection criteria.

C. NCRPB’s Environmental & Social Management System

11. In compliance with ADB Safeguard Policies and National Acts and Policies, an Environmental and Social Management Systems (ESMS) has been developed and adopted by NCRPB. The ESMS elaborates NCRPB's environmental and social policies; and safeguard screening, categorization, and review procedures. The ESMS document also sets out a plan to strengthen the environment and social organization structure and staffing; and sets our performance monitoring and reporting procedures.

12. Social Policy of NCRPB. NCRPB will continually strive to ensure that social safeguards are adhered. NCRPB will work towards -

• Avoiding or minimizing involuntary resettlement and impacts to indigenous peoples by exploring project and design alternatives. • In cases, where IR and impacts on IP are unavoidable, enhancing or, at least, restoring the livelihoods of all affected persons in real terms relative to pre-project levels. • Improving the standard of living of the displaced poor and other vulnerable groups. • Addressing through special efforts to reduce negative impacts on indigenous people; measures to ensure they receive culturally appropriate social and economic benefits, and also to ensure transparent mechanisms including consultations and active participation in projects that affect them. • Ensuring that affected persons benefit from the projects funded to the extent possible. • Ensuring that affected persons benefit from the projects funded to the extent possible and they are consulted on the project at different stages of the project from its planning to implementation • Integrating the RP and IPP with the overall preparation and implementation of the project and payment of compensation and other assistance before award of civil works.

13. Roles & Responsibilities. For day-to-day operation and maintenance of the ESMS, an Environmental and Social Management Cell (ESMC) has been established within the NCRPB, and mandated with the following functions:

(i) Maintain and update the ESMS; (ii) Ensure all subprojects financed by NCRPB are screened, categorized, and reviewed in accordance with the ESMS; (iii) During screening provide advice to the sub borrower to ensure that safeguard (environment, involuntary resettlement, and indigenous peoples) impacts are avoided or minimized; (iv) In accordance with the ESMS ensure that safeguard documents (environmental management plan, resettlement plan, and indigenous peoples plan) as required are prepared;

(v) Set loan conditions for subprojects and ensure all safeguards requirements are fulfilled including but not limited to award of civil works contracts only after compensation where involuntary resettlement occurs; (vi) Monitor subprojects to ensure safeguards compliance in accordance with safeguards documents prepared for subprojects; (vii) Provide training and capacity-building to sub borrowers; (viii) Provide information to ADB and other donors in accordance with the ESMS; (ix) Provide assistance and required information to external ESMS auditors for conducting annual audits; and (x) Ensure monitoring.

14. The following are the various activities involved in ESMS implementation in the project cycle and vis-à-vis roles of respective agencies:

15. Screening & Scoping. Implementing Agency (Project Proponent) submits the categorization form along with necessary project details to the NCRPB as per the ESMS procedures. NCRPB ESMC (Environment and Social Management Cell) reviews and classifies the project as S1 / S2 /S3 and provides guidance to the implementing agencies about the environmental and social safeguard requirements prior to and during NCRPB appraisal. Once the project report along with necessary social safeguard report is submitted, NCRPB will appraise the projects.

Table 1: NCRPB ESMS Social Categorization Category Description – IR Requirement Description – IP Requirement S1 A proposed project is Resettlement Projects are expected to Indigenous classified as category Plan have significant impacts on People A if 200 or more indigenous peoples. Development people will experience Significant impacts are those Plan major impacts, which that directly or indirectly are defined as (i) being affect the dignity, human physically displaced rights, livelihood systems, or from housing or (ii) culture of indigenous peoples losing 10% or more of or affect the territories or their productive assets natural or cultural resources (income generating). that Indigenous peoples own, use, occupy or claim as their ancestral domain. S2 A proposed project is Short Projects where the Indigenous classified as category Resettlement indigenous peoples are the People B if there are potential Plan sole or the overwhelming Development adverse major (as majority of project Plan (Short) defined earlier) beneficiaries, and when only impacts that less than positive impacts are 200 people will identified. experience or there are any minor impacts. S3 A proposed project is No RP or No impacts on indigenous None classified as category SRP required peoples are envisaged. C if it is likely to have no impacts whatsoever.

D. Background of the Monitoring Report

16. NCRPB has submitted to ADB the first tranche PFR (Periodic Financing Request) for $78 million to finance infrastructure subprojects listed in the Table below. As the Facility is

7 provided as an MFF modality through a financial institution and the proposed projects will be reviewed for environmental and social safeguard compliance before disbursement, the list of projects proposed in the PFR are purely indicative. Further, this will also provide flexibility to NCRPB in selecting compliant subprojects within the larger proposed list. It may be noted that the total cost of projects indicated in PFR 1 and presented below in table 2 is much higher than the available funding. Therefore, once all the funds available in Tranche-1 are used, the remaining work will be taken up under tranche 2. Thus some of the tranche 1 sub projects will spill to tranche2. .

17. The projects, including social and environmental safeguard documents, were prepared by PPTA consultants during the Project Preparation stage, and were duly approved by ADB. At present, one subproject has completed construction, two subprojects of Tranche 1 (road project implemented by HSRDC) are under implementation, and the rest are in preparation/bidding stage.

Table 2: First Tranche Subprojects (PFR1 Indicative List) S. No Subproject Implementing Current Agency Implementation Status 1 Development of State Highways (Jhajjar) HSRDC Work 99% completed 2 Badli Byepass - 5.70 Km HSRDC Work Completed 3 Development of Roads (Sonepat) HSRDC Work 80% completed 4 Multi Modal Transit Centre - Sarai Kale DIMTS, Government Delayed project Khan of Delhi 5 Multi Modal Transit Centre - Anand Vihar DIMTS, Government Delayed project of Delhi 6 Panipat - Water Supply PHED, Haryana Delayed project. DIMTS - Delhi Integrated Multimodal Transport System Limited; HSRDC - Haryana State Road Development Corporation; and PHED – Public Health Engineering Department,

18. In respect of Anand Vihar and Sarai Kale Khan MMTCs projects, Commissioner, Transport Department, Govt.of Delhi has informed vide letter dated 21/12/12, that the building plans are at final stage of their sanction and the same are expected soon. Once the sanction is received, the final tender documents will be submitted to NCRPB for approval. Meanwhile during the 50th meeting of the Project Sanctioning and Monitoring Group (PSMG-I) which was held on 07.08.2013, it has been decided that for the time being, NCRPB may cancel and drop the two MMTC projects from its list of to-be- funded projects and GNCT of Delhi may re-submit the loan request to NCRPB for the 2 MMTC projects at a later stage with necessary approvals.

19. With regard to the Panipat Water Supply project PHED, Haryana has informed vide letter dated 10/12/12 that keeping in view the scarcity of raw water from canal, they have decided that this sub project be revised based on Ranney wells system. Subsequently they have informed vide letter dated 22.04.2013 that the revised project based on Ranney well system of Rs.3200 m has been submitted to MOUD, Govt. of India under UIDSSMT Scheme for funding and proposal has been sent to Government to drop the canal based water supply scheme from the NCRPB line of credit.

20. In addition, three sub projects of PHED Haryana and three road sub projects of Haryana were identified for tranche 1 and their status is as follows.

Table 3: First Tranche Subprojects (PFR1 Indicative List) S. No Subproject Implementing Current Agency Implementation

Status 1 Water supply in Nulhar Medical College PHED, Haryana Bidding in process & Nuh Town 2 Augmentation of Water Supply for PHED, Haryana Bidding in process Pataudi and adjoining town of Haily Mandi along with surrounding seven villages 3 Drainage Scheme Sonepat PHED Haryana Bidding in process 4 Widening & Strengthening of Gohana PWD/HSRDC Haryana Bidding in process Lakhanmajra Bhiwani Road upto district Rohtak boundary road from Km. 0.000 to 37.7000 5 Widening &Strengthening of U.P. border PWD/HSRDC Haryana Bidding in process Sonepat Gohana Road up to district Sonepat boundary from km. 11.600 to 74.000 6 Widening & up gradation of Gurgaon- PWD/HSRDC Haryana Bidding in process Chandu-Badli Bahadurgarh Road

21. This is the Social Monitoring Report on implementation of resettlement plans between January – June 2013, and is prepared in compliance with the ADB Policies. The Report is primarily prepared from the monthly and quarterly reports submitted to NCRPB by respective implementing agencies (borrowers of the NCRPB).

E. Scope of Land Acquisition & Involuntary Resettlement Impacts

22. Following Table shows the scope of land acquisition (LA) and classification of the projects in Tranche-1.

Table 3: Scope of Land Acquisition S. No Subproject Implementing IR Impacts Current Status Agency

1 Development of HSRDC No LA was envisaged in SRP State Highways during project preparation. Now (Jhajjar) due to raising the height of the road, additional land was required. LA is complete. Compensation for land acquisition has been paid. The Implementing Agency is revising the RP based on changes in LA. All the impacts on structures, trees and livelihood of affected persons will be recorded Yes, E2/S2 in the revised RP. 2 Badli Byepass - HSRDC Yes, E2/S2 LA acquisition complete. All 5.70 Km compensation related payments already made to affected persons.

S. No Subproject Implementing IR Impacts Current Status Agency

3 Development of HSRDC Yes, E2/S2 No LA was envisaged during Roads (Sonepat) project preparation as possession of land was with government since the road exists for last 50 years. But during actual execution of work villagers in two stretches i.e. in village Sisana and Silana between chainage 24. 974 to 27. 780 and 21.500 to 24.000 respectively, claimed that the land belongs to them. The villagers in chainage 21.500 to 24.000 filed 14 civil suits in local courts claiming the entire road is constructed on their land. The court on its part has not stopped work considering the road was there for the last 50 years. But the final court verdict is awaited. The total area of land and the exact number of persons affected in this stretch is yet to be finalized. Similar situation also existed between chainage 24. 974 to 27. 780. Here IA acquired 9.3125 acre of land invoking Land Acquisition Act 1894. The compensation amount has been decided by the concerned authorities. However due to court case in similar case for chainage 21.500 to 24.000 the payments has been held up . However HSRDC has the budget and will make payment as per the decision of the court. 4 Water supply in PHED, Haryana Yes, E2/S2 Compensation for 2015 marla Nulhar Medical (12.59 acres) already made to College & Nuh ownersfor the land acquisition in Town January 2013. Land measuring 3600 sq mt (0.89 acres) has been allotted by gram punchayat. Now 3.29 acres land is required for which land acquisition process is ongoing. The SRP was prepared in February 2013 and it was reviewed by ADB during mission and comments were made. ADB has commented and the comments are being complied. Bids received. Technical evaluation under process. 5 Augmentation of PHED, Haryana Yes, E2/S3 The land is required for laying Water Supply for pumping main. The pumping Pataudi and main will be laid along road.

S. No Subproject Implementing IR Impacts Current Status Agency

adjoining town of However the land along road Haily Mandi along belongs to Forest Department with surrounding and as per prevalent act/law the seven villages forest department should be provided equal land for a fforestation. About 5 acre land is required. Earlier PHED was planning to acquire private land and transfer to forest department. However now PHED identified surplus land available with them and this surplus land will be given to Forest Department. RP was submitted to ADB. ADB commented that since there are no involuntary resettlement impacts so there is no need of RP. Bids received. Bid evaluation under process. 6 Drainage Scheme PHED Haryana Yes, E2/S2 No land acquisition. Only Sonepat temporary impacts. RP has been approved by ADB Bids received and LOA issued 7 Widening & HSRDC Yes, E2/S2 Strengthening of Gohana Lakhanmajra RP has been approved by ADB Bhiwani Road up subject to some compliances. to district Rohtak Land acquisition award has been boundary road issued and compensation from Km. 0.000 to payment is ongoing. SRP being 37.7000 implemented 8 Widening HSRDC Yes, E2/S2 RP approved by ADB. It involves &Strengthening of no land acquisition. Payment of U.P. border structures made as per SRP Bids Sonepat Gohana received and LOA issued Road up to district Sonepat boundary from km. 11.600 to 74.000 9 Widening & up Yes, E2/S2 For bidding purpose this work gradation of has been bifurcated in two Gurgaon-Chandu- works. SRP for one work Badli Bahadurgarh Badli has been Bahadurgarh approved by ADB. Land Road acquisition is almost completed. Payment for land is ongoing. The SRP for second work Gurgaon Badli is under final stage of preparation. Land acquisition is in process. Bids received. 10 Multi Modal DIMTS Yes, Temporary No LA. Project delayed. Transit Centre - Impact Sarai Kale Khan 11 Multi Modal DIMTS Yes, Temporary No LA. Project delayed.

S. No Subproject Implementing IR Impacts Current Status Agency

Transit Centre - Impact Anand Vihar 12 Panipat - Water PHED, Haryana Yes, E2 / S2 LA will be required. PHED Supply Haryana has informed vide letter dated 10/12/12 that keeping in view the scarcity of raw water from canal, they have decided that this sub project be revised based on Ranney wells system. Subsequently they have informed vide letter dated 22.04.2013 that the revised project based on Ranney well system of Rs.3200 m has been submitted to MOUD, Govt. of India under UIDSSMT Scheme for funding and proposal has been sent to Government to drop the canal based water supply scheme from the NCRPB line of credit. IA – Implementing Agency; IR – involuntary resettlement; LA – land acquisition; MMTC – Multi Modal Transit Centre.

F. Status of Resettlement Plans Implementation

23. As stated above only two road projects are under implementation and one subproject has completed construction . Letter of acceptance has been issued for two sub projects and one of the two packages of one sub project. Bids for two sub projects and one of the two packages of one sub project is under evaluation. The Sub-project –wise implementation status of Resettlement Plans for the three road subprojects (two under implementation and one completed construction) is given below. For each subproject, after the table on RP implementation status, a small note on important aspects of the respective subprojects has been presented.

1. Subprojects in Implementation/Construction

Table 4: Subproject - Badli Bypass

S. Activity Completed Remarks No Y/N RP Preparation 1. Final RP approved by ADB prior to contract Y award 2. Disclosure of the final RP on the ADB and EA’s Y Revised RP for the subproject (July 2012) uploaded on ADB website. However this RP has been website. Circulating copies of RPs to all revised in June 2012 reflect minor changes during implementation. stakeholders including DPs, translating summary RP in local language. 3. Current Status of IR impacts Y Affected Persons – 146 families (28 families with significant impact) and land parcel belonging to 1 private company. Affected Structures – Temporary Rooms – 9, Wells – 6, staircase – 1, Boring Well – 4, Hand pump – 1, Tube well boring – 1, Affected Trees (private ownership) – Non fruit bearing trees – 75, Fruit bearing trees - 68 Affected livelihood – 28 families. Payment of compensation is complete. Further the payment of annuity will be disbursed over a period of 33 years*. RP implementation 4. Grievance Redress Mechanism established and Y public informed 5. Public Information Booklet circulated - 6. Finalization of inventory Y Refer to annexure 2 and 3 for details of affected land, structures and trees. 7. Finalization of current market rates for all types Y of assets as per method in RP 8. Finalization of compensation rates as per Y method in RP 9. If negotiated settlement, hiring of independent NA Land acquisition carried out under LA Act 1894 and R&R Policy of Haryana Government. Compulsory external party to document the negotiation and nature of acquisition. settlement processes 10. DPs informed of losses and entitlements - Y Summary Compensation Form prepared and distributed to each DP 11. Payment of compensation, allowances, and Y Land compensation payment details and evidence are provided in annexure 2 and 4. Moreover the other assistance (# of DPs) APs were compensated under the following heads: (i) Rehabilitation grant for Land owners losing more than 10 % of their total land holding has been paid to 28 APs;

(ii) Subsistence allowance for land owners losing more than 10 % of their total land holding has been paid to the same 28 APs; (iii) Ex gratia payment for minimal land acquisition paid to 118 APs. The evidence has been attached as annexure 5. The payment of annuity which has to be given for a period of 33 years. 12. Completion of resettlement sites NA 13. Public information on resettlement sites and NA transfer schedule 14. Relocation of shopkeepers NA 15. Transfer of all land for civil works Y 16. Ongoing consultation with DPs Y 17. Income rehabilitation assistance Y All the DPs are continuing their pre-project livelihood practices and nobody is forced to search for alternative livelihood options due to the project. All the affected persons have been provided with compensation for loss of land, structures and trees. Moreover assistance in the form of rehabilitation grants, subsistence allowance and ex-gratia payment to the affected persons are also provided. 18. Grievance Redress Y No grievances received. a. No. of complaints received b. No. of Complaints addressed c. Outstanding complaints RP Monitoring and Evaluation 19. External monitoring agency contracted N As per ESMS guidelines annual audit shall be conducted for 25% of the subprojects having limited impacts i.e. subprojects categorized as S2. * As per Haryana Government’s R&R Policy, annuity has be paid for 33 years @ Rs. 21000/acre with an increment of Rs. 750/acre per year. The amount comes down to Rs. 1,089,000/Acre for a period of 33 years.

i. Badli Bypass – 5.70 Km

24. Compliance status of the subproject: There are 146 DP families who are affected by the subproject. Of them 28 affected families have suffered significant impact and the other 118 families have suffered minor impact. Thus this subproject has been categorized as NCRPB category S2 which is similar to ADB’s IR category B. As per the requirements a short resettlement plan has been prepared and after due approval (from ADB) was uploaded on ADB’s website. Land acquisition has been carried out according to the provisions of Land Acquisition Act 1894. Payment of compensation for acquired agricultural land was done following the procedures of LA Act 1894 and R&R Policy, Government of Haryana. Payment of compensation except the annuity amount stands completed. The following table presents safeguard compliance status of this subproject.

Table 5: Subproject - Badli Bypass Compliance Status of RP implementation Sl. Particulars National NCRPB ADB Remarks No. Act/ Policy/ requirements requirements Rules invoked 1. Land acquisition LA Act and Compensation Compensation i. Land value - and compensation R&R Policy for land as per for land at Market rates were Government LA Act. replacement considered for of Haryana. value. payment of compensation against land. ii. 30% solatium paid in consideration of compulsory nature of acquisition on the total price of land. iii. 12% P.A. was allocated over the base price of land as additional market value. iv. Annuity @ Rs. 21,000/- per acre/ per annum, which will be increased by a fixed amount of Rs. 750/- every year*. 2. Structure Public Works Structure will Structure to Complied. compensation Department be be The compensation (PWD) has compensated compensated details of structure done the at at and trees attached valuation replacement replacement as annexure 3. without cost cost depreciation. without without depreciation depreciation 3. Compensation for (i) Forest Draft Replacement Complied. trees Department entitlement value Draft entitlement has done the matrix matrix indicates the valuation of indicates the same. timber trees. departments (ii) for evaluation. Horticulture

Sl. Particulars National NCRPB ADB Remarks No. Act/ Policy/ requirements requirements Rules invoked Department has done the valuation of fruit bearing trees. 4. Assistance for NRRP 2007 Livelihood Livelihood (i) Rehabilitation livelihood loss assistance assistance grant for Land provided for for loss of owners losing loss of livelihood more than 10 % of livelihood (land / their total land (land / commercial) holding; commercial) (ii) Subsistence allowance for land owners losing more than 10 % of their total land holding; (iii) Ex gratia payment for minimal land acquisition.

* ESMS mentions that in Haryana state, annuity is provided as livelihood loss.

25. Land Acquisition and compensation: Private agricultural land measuring 60.800 acres and governmental land3 measuring 3.625 acres has been required for the formation of the bypass, making it a total land acquisition of 64.425 acres (26.083 hectares). Payment from the implementing agency i.e. HSRDC, Haryana to the concerned land collector for further payment to the affected persons was completed in December 2010 (attached as annexure 4). Land acquisition was done under section-4 of Land Acquisition Act. (No.1 of 1984). Market rates were considered for payment of compensation against land. The measurement and the classification of the land have been accepted by the landowners and the interested persons who are present and no objection in this regard has been received. For payment of compensation R&R Policy Government of Haryana was also invoked. Cash compensation was paid to the DPs against their respective quantum of land acquired. The main features of compensation against land acquisition in this subproject are as follows:

• The collector of Jhajjar District has provided the Market Rates @ Rs. 25 lacs (Rs. 2,500,000) per acre of land under acquisition; • The land owners and the interested persons has been paid 30% solatium in consideration of compulsory nature of acquisition on the total price of land; • In addition 12% P.A. was allocated over the base price of land as additional market value; • As per Haryana Government R&R Policy Annuity @ of Rs. 21000 P.A. per acre of land was also paid;

3 Governmental Land includes Gram Panchayat and Public Utility Roads. Out of the 3.625 Acres Land, land acquisition cost was paid for 3.3875 Acres to the Gram Panchayat of three villages. The remaining 0.2375 Acres of land was acquired from the Haryana Government, hence no payment made.

• As per the Haryana Government R&R Policy an increment of Rs. 750 per acre per year for 33 years shall also be paid to the land owners with each passing year.

26. Compensation against structures and trees under private ownership: Valuation of structures was done by Public Works Department (PWD) without depreciation. The estimate for the wells was prepared by Public Health Engineering Department (PHED). The valuation of non-fruit bearing timber trees was done by Forest Department and the fruit bearing trees was done by the Horticulture Department. The valuation amount has been provided in annexure 3. Actual payment to the DPs has been made but NCRPB is yet to receive the evidence documents in that regard. The Implementing Agency is in the process of sending the same to NCRPB.

27. Other Compensation: The Resettlement Cost (Table 5, subtotal 3 – Resettlement costs and assistance) a budget of Rs. 6,939,400 has been provisioned in the resettlement plan. As per immediate information received and annexed as Annexure 5, total amount of Rs. 6,799,400 has been paid to the DPs. Only the amount of Rs. 140,000 scheduled for training of 31 DPs has not been utilized. All the DPs are continuing their pre-project livelihood practices and nobody is forced to search for alternative livelihood options due to the project. Thus according to the Implementing Agency there is no need of any training. The following table presents the details in brief.

Table 6: Subproject - Badli Bypass Resettlement costs

S. Items Unit rates in Number Quantity Amount in Remarks No. Rs. of days Rs. 1. Compensation 2500,000 / NA 64.425 246,500,000 The total for land acre acres amount has been deposited with the land collector. This payment is more than the amount budgeted in this table. Land Collector will refund the excess amount back to the Implementin g agency. 2. Compensation NA. NA. NA. 344,158 All for structure temporary structures and tube wells.

3. Compensation NA. NA. NA. 112,250 Includes for Non fruit fruit bearing bearing trees and non Compensation NA NA NA 657,470 fruit bearing for Non fruit trees. bearing trees Total 769,720 4. Rehabilitation grant 151 750 28 3,171,000 28 DPs for Land owners have lost losing more than 10 more than % of their total land 10% of their holding – 750 man land days of minimum holding. wages. Refer to annexure 1 and annexure 5. 5. Subsistence 151 300 28 1,268,400 28 DPs allowance for land have lost owners losing more more than than 10 % of their 10% of their total land holding – land 300 man days of holding. minimum wages. Refer to annexure 1 and annexure 5. 6. Ex gratia payment 20000 (Lump sum) 118 2,360,000 118 DPs for minimal land have lost acquisition (linear less than acquisition) 10% of their total land holding. Refer to annexure 1 and annexure 5.

28. For Resettlement Cost (Table 5, subtotal 4 – Cost of Implementation of RP) a budget of Rs. 1,325,000 has been provisioned in the resettlement plan (RP). The implementing agency has successfully implemented the RP without hiring any external agency or NGO. Hence the amount provisioned for this purpose in the RP, was not utilized as well. The RP will be revised and updated based on all recent developments regarding the implementation. The revised final RP will be shared with ADB and also uploaded in NCRPB’s website.

Table 7. Summary Table of Resettlement Progress – Badli Bypass ENTITLEMENTS* SI No. Total Type of Loss (land, Cash Land for Replacemen Allowance Assistance Vulnerable Evidence ** number of structure, livelihood, crops, land t Shop DP etc) 1. 146 Land, structure, and trees Cash No DP was No shop was Subsistence 28 DPs No vulnerable All available compensation allotted land affected. allowance for losing more DP. evidence has paid for land. 300 man than 10% been annexed days @ Rs. of their total (annexure 1- 5). 151 land Some more (minimum holding evidence wage) was were documents like paid to 28 compensat the payment DPs losing ed (750 details against more than man days loss of structure 10% of their @ Rs. 151 and trees; is total land i.e. awaited. holding. minimum wages ) Note: As per Haryana Government’s R&R Policy, annuity has to be paid for 33 years @ Rs. 21000/acre with an increment of Rs. 750/acre per year.

Table 8: Subproject – Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District

S. Activity Completed Remarks No Y/N RP Preparation 1. Final RP approved by ADB prior to contract Y Draft RP initially prepared by PPTA consultants and was approved by ADB. However, due to award unanticipated impacts the RP had to be revised. The implementing agency has revised the RP and NCRPB is currently examining the RP. ADB has expressed apprehension that the impacts in totality may make its category to S1. In context to ADBs concerns PMC consultant has visited the site and concluded that the categorization of the sub project will not alter and shall be under s2 category as categorized earlier. Revised RP is under preparation with PMC. 2. Disclosure of the final RP on the ADB and EA’s Y website. Circulating copies of RPs to all stakeholders including DPs, translating summary RP in local language. RP implementation 3. Grievance Redress Mechanism established Y and public informed 4. Public Information Booklet circulated - It will be done after the RP is revised. Public disclosure meetings have been conducted by the IA and the project affected persons were intimated about their entitlements. 5. Finalization of inventory Y 6. Finalization of current market rates for all types Y of assets as per method in RP 7. Finalization of compensation rates as per Y method in RP 8. If negotiated settlement, hiring of independent NA Land acquisition was not envisaged during the subproject appraisal. But later on due to raising the external party to document the negotiation and road from the natural ground level additional land was required. Hence, land acquisition carried out settlement processes under LA Act 1894 and R&R Policy of Haryana Government. Compulsory nature of acquisition. 9. DPs informed of losses and entitlements - Y Summary Compensation Form prepared and distributed to each DP 10. Payment of compensation, allowances, and Y During initial RP preparation no land acquisition (LA) was envisaged. Only 8 encroachers were other assistance (# of DPs) identified to have encroached upon part of the ROW and the RP duly reflected the same. But at a later stage due to raising of the road level from the natural ground level considering the drainage problem in the area, land acquisition was required. Since this is a case of unanticipated impact due to change in design during implementation resulting to involuntary resettlement, the Implementing Agency HSRDC was asked to conduct a social impact assessment followed by census survey and revise the RP covering SR2 requirements and the ESMS. Necessary assessment has been done and PMC is revising the SRP Land acquisition carried out under LA Act 1894 and R&R Policy of Haryana Government. Compulsory nature of acquisition. It is reported by Implementing Agency (HSRDC) that all the compensation payments related to LA are now complete. RP has been revised accordingly.

11. Unanticipated Impacts Y Land acquired - 29.04 Acres Total Affected families – 229 (39 families suffering significant impact and 190 families suffering insignificant impact) Affected Structures - Semi-permanent = 992.93 square meter, Temporary = 704.44 square meter, compound wall = 1289.73 meters. Due to agricultural land acquisition rehabilitation grants, subsistence allowance and ex-gratia payment to the affected persons would be provided to the affected families. 12. Completion of resettlement sites NA 13. Public information on resettlement sites and NA transfer schedule 14. Relocation of shopkeepers N Not required. 15. Transfer of all land for civil works Y 16. Ongoing consultation with DPs Y 17. Income rehabilitation assistance N Rehabilitation grants, subsistence allowance and ex-gratia payment to the affected persons will be paid to the persons suffering significant impacts due to acquisition of agricultural land. The RP submitted has provisions for the same. NCRPB is currently reviewing the RP. As RP implementation is a continuous process after review payments will be made. However compensation for land has been deposited with the concerned authority for further payment to the affected persons. 18. Grievance Redress Y No grievances received. a. No. of complaints received b. No. of Complaints addressed c. Outstanding complaints RP Monitoring and Evaluation 19. External monitoring agency contracted N As per ESMS guidelines annual audit shall be conducted for 25% of the subprojects having limited impacts i.e. subprojects categorized as S2.

ii. Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District

29. Background and current status: The initial RP prepared by the PPTA consultants had no issues regarding land acquisition. The census survey was carried out and some residences and shops that have encroached upon the ROW belonging to 8 households were identified. The RP indicated that those 8 households were likely to be affected during the widening and strengthening of the road stretches. All the compensation required were provisioned in the RP accordingly.

30. During implementation of the works the design was changed by raising road level above natural ground level to take care of drainage problems and increase life of road. This resulted in requirement of additional land and LA was required. Thus this is a case of unanticipated impact resulting into involuntary resettlement. The Implementing Agency HSRDC was requested to revise the RP covering S2 requirements (as per ADB Safeguard Policy) and ESMS. Accordingly HSRDC has conducted a census survey and have revised and prepared a draft SRP incorporating final impact due to land acquisition (LA). The detailed documentation/proof of the affected persons in the revised RP shall be made available to ADB at the earliest.

Table 9: Comparison between the initial RP and the revised RP Impacts identified in Initial RP Impacts identified in the revised RP

Land acquisition - Nil Land acquired - 29.04 Acres Affected Families – 8 Total Affected families – 229 (36 families severely affected due to land affected more than 10% + 3 families severely due to structure)

31. Quantum of Land Acquisition: According to the draft RP a total 29.04 acres of land has been acquired as per Land Acquisition Act 1894 (amended in 1984) and Haryana Government R & R Policy 2010 and compensation has been paid to all the affected persons. Compensation for land has been done at replacement value based on prevalent market rates. The nature of LA is compulsory acquisition (eminent domain) and not based on private negotiations. The land acquisition has been done on 4 roads involving 22 villages. Land Acquisition has been done adjoining the following 4 roads:

i. Badli to Durina via Ladpur Munimpur, ii. Badli Pelpa Sondhi Yakubpur Road, iii. Subana (SH-22) Sarola Ahri Road and iv. Jhajjar Farrukhnagar Road (SH-15A) Mubarakpur Ismailpur Mundakhera (MDR-136) Badli Iqbalpur Galibpur upto District Border.

32. Affected Persons: The total DP households affected is 229 as per the revised RP. Implementing agency has submitted the revised RP and NCRPB is currently examining the same. Of them 39 DPs are likely to suffer significant impact and the remaining 190 DPs would be losing only a strip of their land. Out of the 39 DPs suffering significant impact 36 DPs will suffer impact on more than 10% of their land holding and 3 non-titled DPs will have impact on their structures. A sample socio-economic survey was carried out amongst 229 impacted households. Most of the households derive their main income through agriculture and only 25 percent have business as their main source of income. The detailed documentation/proof of the affected persons in the revised RP shall be made available to ADB at the earliest.

Table 10: Summary of Resettlement Impacts - Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District Rehabilitation of 9 Impact roads in Jhajjar District Permanent Land Acquisition (Acres) 29.04 Acres Temporary Land Acquisition (Acres) 0 Total number of DP households suffering Significant Impact* 39 a Total number of DP households suffering Not Significant Impact 190

Total DP Households 229 Affected Structures Refer Annexure 6 for details Affected Trees/Crops Refer Annexure 6 for details Affected Common Property Resources Refer Annexure 6 for details Average Family Size Refer Annexure 6 for details Average Household Income Rs.4,579/- p.m. * DPs suffering more than 10 % of their assets. a Of the 261 AP’s:- 3 losing their Structures & 36 losing agricultural land more than 10% ,had faced significant impact and the impact on the remaining 194 households are not significant and they have lost only a strip of landholding. Note: All the details furnished regarding the R&R impacts of the subproject - Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District, are yet to be verified by NCRPB as the matter has been reported recently. All the details will be verified by NCRPB on site and shared with ADB appropriately.

Table 11 : Summary Table of Resettlement Progress – Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District ENTITLEMENTS* SI No. Total Type of Loss (land, structure, Cash Land for Replacement Allowance Assistance Vulnerable Evidence ** number of livelihood, crops, etc) land Shop DP 1. 229 Land and structure Cash No DP was No shop was Subsistenc Rehabilitati 5 (FHH) All the relevant compen allotted land affected to the e allowance on Grant evidences are sation for land. extent of being has been has been awaited. paid shut. provisioned provisioned in the RP in the RP for the DPs for the DPs losing more losing more than 10% than 10% of their total of their total land land holding. holding (750 man days @ minimum wages ) Note: The RP is under examination of NCRPB. Impact on vulnerable will be included as per entitlement matrix.

Table 12: Subproject – Development of Roads in Sonepat District

S. Activity Completed Y/N Remarks No RP Preparation 1. Final RP approved by ADB prior to contract award N Draft RP initially prepared by PPTA consultants. However during actual implementation it was found out that the villagers of village Sisana own land within the RoW. Moreover in another stretch under village Silana, villagers filed 14 court cases claiming the road runs through their land. The court is yet to give a verdict. Due to these unanticipated impacts the RP needs to be revised. 2. Disclosure of the final RP on the ADB and EA’s website. Y Circulating copies of RPs to all stakeholders including DPs, translating summary RP in local language. RP implementation 3. Grievance Redress Mechanism established and public informed Y 4. Public Information Booklet circulated - 5. Finalization of inventory Y 6. Finalization of current market rates for all types of assets as per Y method in RP 7. Finalization of compensation rates as per method in RP N Land acquisition was not envisaged during project preparation stage. The proposed widening and strengthening had to be carried out within the available RoW with Public Works Department (PWD). The road was in use for the last 50 years. But during on-ground verification of land records private ownership was revealed in some portions. LA was carried out and finalization of compensation has been done for the stretch under village Sisana. Payment would be made after court decision in the other stretch being similar cases. Villagers in stretch Silana claiming the road runs through their land has taken the matter to court. Currently the matter is with judiciary. Finalization on compensation in this stretch, if required, will be done after court gives the verdict on ownership status of the land. 8. If negotiated settlement, hiring of independent NA external party to document the negotiation and settlement processes 9. DPs informed of losses and entitlements - Summary N DPs informed of losses and entitlements but matter sub-judice so no actual Compensation Form prepared and distributed to each DP payment has been made. 10. Payment of compensation, allowances, and other assistance (# Payment of compensation not yet made as some villagers have filed court cases of DPs) claiming some portion of the road to be their private property. Details given under the heading ‘background and current status’. 11. Completion of resettlement sites NA 12. Public information on resettlement sites and transfer schedule NA 13. Relocation of shopkeepers NA 14. Transfer of all land for civil works Y

15. Ongoing consultation with DPs Y 16. Income rehabilitation assistance N Shall be decided after decision from court. 17. Grievance Redress N Villagers have moved court and the matter is sub-judice. a. No. of complaints received b. No. of Complaints addressed c. Outstanding complaints RP Monitoring and Evaluation 18. External monitoring agency contracted N As per ESMS guidelines annual audit shall be conducted for 25% of the subprojects having limited impacts i.e. subprojects categorized as S2.

iii. Development of Roads in Sonepat District

33. Background and current status: During initial RP preparation no land acquisition (LA) was envisaged. During the initial RP preparation it was presumed that the land on which widening and strengthening were proposed belonged to PWD (Building& Roads); since the road has been there for the last 50 years or so. Based on this assumption, survey was carried out and only 55 agricultural encroachers, 2 structural encroachments belonging to 2 DP and 13 common property resources were identified to have encroached upon part of the ROW and the RP duly reflected the same.

34. The work was awarded, and in the midst of work during compulsory tree cutting by Forest Department on Gohana-Sisana Road between chainage 24.974 to 27.780 in the village Sisana the villagers stopped work claiming that the trees are on their private land and hence their private property. During verification of land records it was found that the ownership is of villagers but the road exists since 50 years and as such land is in possession of Government. Also the villagers never raised land owner ship issue. Therefore, the Implementing Agency (HSRDC) initiated land acquisition procedures under Land Acquisition Act 1894 and R&R Policy of Haryana Government in stretch I that is between chainage 24. 974 to 27. 780. Total 9.3125 acre of land was acquired by the Implementing Agency (HSRDC). As per reports received there are 150 affected persons. However the payment was kept in abeyance as similar case was observed in chainage 21.5 to 24 km in village Silana and their the villagers took the matter in court.

35. Villagers in two stretch i.e. in village Sisana and Silana between chainage 24. 974 to 27. 780 and 21.500 to 24.000 respectively claimed that the land belongs to them; although the road exists for last 50 years, ownership is with them only. The road has 60 feet RoW on ground, but not in revenue records. The villagers represented the matter in court. The court is yet to decide the matter 36. Stretch 1 (village Sisana): about 2.7 km - The issue of land acquisition (LA) first cropped up in this stretch

• Villagers stopped tree cutting by forest department with a claim that trees are on their land; land records and demarcation at site revealed the following:

o the road department owned only 22' feet of RoW for about 88% of road length o the road department owned no land in the rest 12% length

• Since the road was already under construction, the department concerned held meeting with the villagers and proceeded with LA under Land Acquisition Act 1894 (amended in 1984) and issued notification under sections 4 and 6. • No court case pertaining to this section of the road. • The Implementing Agency (HSRDC) is yet to pay compensation for land acquisition (replacement cost- based on prevalent market rates). • Work already finished in this stretch of road.

Stretch 2 (village Silana): 2.5 km - Issue at this stretch arose after the start of LA proceedings in stretch 1

• During the execution of the work, villagers filed 14 civil suits in local courts claiming that the road is constructed on their land while the actual path owned by roads department is elsewhere. • The Implementing Agency (HSRDC) claims that the road currently being widened is in use for last 50 years and no one claimed ownership till date.

• The Implementing Agency (HSRDC) has taken a written statement from villagers that the road exists from last 50 years at the same place where it is currently being widened. • The matter is currently sub-judice, however, courts have not stayed the work, in some cases it put a stay on tree cutting only. • Work is complete in this stretch as well.

37. Lessons learned and way ahead: The Implementing Agency (HSRDC) reported the matter to NCRPB very recently. Since there is unanticipated impact resulting to involuntary resettlement, the Implementing Agency HSRDC was asked to conduct a social impact assessment followed by census survey and revise the RP covering SR2 requirements and the ESMS. It was suggested to expedite the payment procedure to the DPs depending upon the court verdict on actual ownership of land. The Implementing Agency has agreed to conduct a social impact assessment and revise the RP.

38. But to avoid such future incidences the Implementing Agency should verify the details of the land ownership thoroughly before implementing any subproject. Moreover detailed consultation with the beneficiaries needs to be carried out before going for actual implementation of work. Matters should be settled amicably so that the court cases are avoided.

Table 13. Summary Table of Resettlement Progress – Subproject: Development of Roads in Sonepat District ENTITLEMENTS* SI No. Total Type of Loss (land, structure, Cash Land for Replacement Allowance Assistance Vulnerable Evidence ** number of livelihood, crops, etc) land Shop DP 1. 150 Land and trees No Matter is sub- No shop is - - - - paymen judice reported to be t made affected. till date Note: LA was carried out and finalization of payment is complete in the stretch under village Sisana. Payment would be made after other relevant section of LA act is issued. Villagers in stretch Silana claiming the road runs through their land has taken the matter to court. Currently the matter is with judiciary. Finalization on compensation in this stretch, if required, will be done after court gives the verdict on ownership status of the land.

2. Subprojects in Preparation/Bidding

39. This section deals with the subprojects which are under bidding. The project preparedness and current status of each subproject has been tabulated below.

Table 14: Status of the upcoming subprojects

S. Name of the Sub Categorization IEE Expected Resettlement Expected No. Project Checklist- Report date of Plan date of Social submission submission 1. Water supply in S2 IEE NA SRP reviewed 21 November Nulhar Medical approved by ADB in 2013 College & Nuh by ADB on February 2013. Town 06-05- The SRP was 2013 revised and sent to ADB. ADB has commented 2. Augmentation of S2 IEE NA PHED will NA Water Supply for approved transfer land to Pataudi and by ADB on forest adjoining town of 15-05- department. No Haily Mandi along 2013 impacts and as with surrounding such SRP not seven villages required 3. Drainage Scheme S2 IEE NA SRP approved NA Sonepat approved by ADB by ADB 4. Widening & S2 IEE NA SRP approved NA Strengthening of approved by ADB with Gohana by ADB on some Lakhanmajra 06-05- comments. IA Bhiwani Road 2013. is upto district implementing Rohtak boundary the SRP road from Km. 0.000 to 37.7000 5. Widening S2 IEE NA SRP approved NA &Strengthening of approved by ADB on 08- U.P. border by ADB on 05-2013. SRP Sonepat Gohana 08-05- implemented Road up to district 2013. Sonepat boundary from km. 11.600 to 74.000 6. Widening & up S2 IEE NA One part 14 Nov 2013 gradation of approved Bahadurgarh Gurgaon-Chandu- by ADB on Badli SRP Badli- 15-05- approved by Bahadurgarh 2013 ADB. Other Road part Gurgaon Badli SRP under preparation

G. Lessons Learned and Follow Up Actions

40. Following the issues of unanticipated land acquisition in two road subprojects it is felt that, better coordination and regular public consultation is needed to avoid such issues. Also more detailed effort should be done during design to identify status of ownership of land. The design should be done thoroughly in first stage so that changes do not occur during implementation in design. Moreover there is need to carry out detailed survey to determine land ownership status during project preparation phase to avoid or limit issues of unanticipated impacts. Thorough verification of land records along the stretch of all proposed subproject will also help to avoid any confusion regarding the ownership status of land. Detailed public consultation shall result in prompt actions being taken to mitigate such issues and matters being settled amicably. NCRPB has already taken note of the lacuna regarding the safeguards and is in the process of streamlining any gaps whatsoever. The following issues were identified which need to be dealt with appropriate planning.

• Carrying out more detailed examination during project preparatory phase for determining land ownership and other involuntary resettlement (IR) impacts; • Freeze technical design during the first phase of any subproject. Changing designs during execution results in unanticipated impacts and unnecessary delay. Moreover NCRPB and other donor agencies will face reputational risks and competency related issues; • Capacity building / Training of staff on safeguard requirements in the various implementing agencies as well as their consultants working with NCRPB; • Finalization of the Entitlement Matrix for NCRPB; • Improved monitoring of the sub-projects under implementation especially on the issues related to safeguards.

Table 15: Compliance status of the subprojects under implementation Particulars Actions taken / Required

Subproject - Badli Bypass

1. Resettlement planning RP was prepared and duly approved by ADB. However the RP was revised to accommodate the issues identified during actual implementation. 2. Implementation of proposed All forms of Compensation have been paid rehabilitation measures including rehabilitation grant, subsistence allowance and ex-gratia payment*. 3. Unanticipated Involuntary resettlement Impact on structures was not anticipated. But impacts during actual implementation impact on structures were identified and compensated without depreciation. Details annexed as annexure 3. 4. Information Disclosure Consultation and Focus group discussions, meetings, and Participation individual interviews were conducted involving stakeholders, particularly people living in the villages before and during RP implementation phase. 5. Grievance Redress Mechanism No grievances were received at any stage of the subproject. The villagers are aware of the proposed bypass and are not averse to their land being acquired as they are all aware of the annuity scheme of Haryana Government. The Implementing Agency disseminated all other information regarding additional benefits under this subproject. Deputy

Particulars Actions taken / Required General Manager (DGM), HSRDC, Rohtak was directly in touch with the affected persons and supervised the implementation of RP with due diligence. The RP indicated that the HSRDC will constitute a three-member Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) comprising of the Deputy General Manager (DGM), HSRDC, Rohtak (jurisdictional DGM), the elected member of the subproject area and one member from the public who is known to be persons of integrity, good judgment and commands respect among the community. However NCRPB has not received any documents regarding the same. 6. Special Considerations for Indigenous No Indigenous People affected by the People subproject. 7. Monitoring and Reporting DGM, HSRDC has the mandate to internally monitor the aspects of RP implementation. The implementing Agency HSRDC submits quarterly reports to NCRPB.

Subproject- Development of State Highways in Jhajjar District

1. Resettlement planning Draft RP was prepared. No land acquisition was envisaged during RP preparation. Minor IR impacts were recorded on some agricultural encroachers and structures encroaching upon the RoW. But at a later stage due to raising of the road level from the natural ground level considering the drainage problem in the area, land acquisition was required. Based on the changes the implementing agency has prepared a revised RP which is being examined by NCRPB. After revision ADB’s approval will be taken. Subsequently, the revised RP will be sent to ABD for approval. 2. Implementation of proposed Land acquisition has been made and the rehabilitation measures compensation amount for the land acquired has been deposited with the concerned authorities for further disbursement to affected persons. Further details are awaited from IA. 3. Unanticipated Involuntary resettlement Unanticipated impacts led to land acquisition and impacts impact on structure and trees. All the impact including employment / income has been recorded. 4. Information Disclosure Consultation and During RP preparation entitlements were Participation discussed with the affected families. The IA conducted focus group discussions, meetings, and individual interviews involving stakeholders, particularly people living in the villages. After ADB’s approval final RP will be shared with the stakeholders. 5. Grievance Redress Mechanism No grievances were received. The HSRDC has constituted a three-member Grievance Redressal Committee (GRC) comprising of the DGM, HSRDC, Rohtak (jurisdictional DGM), the elected member of the project area and one member from the public who is known to be persons of integrity, good

Particulars Actions taken / Required judgment and commands respect among the community. 6. Special Considerations for Indigenous No IP among the affected persons. People 7. Monitoring and Reporting DGM, HSRDC is continuously monitoring internally the aspects of RP implementation. The implementing Agency HSRDC submits quarterly reports to NCRPB.

Subproject- Development of Roads in Sonepat District

1. Resettlement planning Draft RP was prepared. No land acquisition was envisaged during RP preparation. Minor IR impacts were recorded on some agricultural encroachers and structures encroaching upon the RoW. But during actual execution of work villagers in two stretch i.e. in village Sisana and Silana between chainage 24. 974 to 27. 780 and 21.500 to 24.000 respectively claimed that the land belongs to them. During verification of land records the villagers claim was proved right between chainage 24. 974 to 27. 780 and consequently the implementing agency acquired 9.3125 acre of land. The commissioner rate (compensation) for land acquisition in this stretch has been fixed. Compensation will be paid as per decision in the court case for other stretch But between chainage 21.500 to 24.000 the villagers filed 14 civil suits in local courts claiming the entire road is constructed on their land. But at the same time they have agreed to the fact that the road existed on the same alignment for the past 50 years. The final court verdict regarding the ownership right is yet to be announced. The amount of land and the exact number of persons affected in this stretch is yet to be enumerated. Based on these developments the RP needs to fully revised. The implementing agency is currently involved in the revision of RP. 2. Implementation of proposed rehabilitation Acquisition of land in one stretch complete. As measures per preliminary information 150 persons were affected. The commissioner rate (compensation) for land acquisition in this stretch has been fixed and shall be disbursed after issuance of other relevant sections of LA Act. 3. Unanticipated Involuntary resettlement Since the road was existing for the last 50 years, impacts it appears that implementing agency had not checked the land ownership records all along the alignment. This led to ownership related disputes and unanticipated impacts in two stretch of the road. However land has been peacefully acquired in one stretch and compensation has been decided. The entire matter was reported to NCRPB very

Particulars Actions taken / Required recently. 4. Information Disclosure Consultation and Proper information regarding the proposed Participation improvement of the road might not have been disclosed during the project preparation phase. This resulted into land related disputes. However, in one stretch due to active public consultation land has been acquired. This activity shall be continued throughout the remaining project cycle. 5. Grievance Redress Mechanism Similar to other subprojects being executed by HSRDC a grievance redress mechanism is in place under the active participation of DGM, HSRDC, in-charge of the subproject. 6. Special Considerations for Indigenous As per preliminary reports no affected person People from indigenous peoples category. However details are awaited. 7. Monitoring and Reporting The matter regarding the unanticipated impacts has been reported to NCRPB very recently. The implementing agency in general submitting quarterly reports to NCRPB, compiling mostly physical progress of work. All the unanticipated impacts of this subproject will be recorded in the RP which is under preparation. * Except the payment of annuity amount which shall be paid for a period of 33 years.

41. The safeguards documents of Badli Bypass present a satisfactory picture. The knowledge regarding the safeguards policies of NCRPB and ADB among the officers of this subproject is commendable. The division looking after the execution has already disbursed all compensation to the affected persons of this subproject. There were no issues of unanticipated land acquisition and land was acquired in consensus of the affected persons. Market price was considered for the payment of against acquisition of land. Affected structures and trees were also duly compensated as per provisions in the draft entitlement matrix of NCRPB. Rehabilitation grant was also paid to the affected families losing more than 10% of their land.

42. Independent evaluation: The ESMS has a provision of an independent evaluation of the environmental and social safeguards practices of the NCRPB and the projects funded by it. Towards this end, an annual independent auditing of the environmental and social safeguards practices of the NCRPB is included. This ESMS audit will also: • Assess the client's ability to manage and address all relevant social and environmental risks and impacts of its business and operations, in particular, the issues identified in donor’s safeguard requirements; • Assess the client's compliance record with applicable laws and regulations of the jurisdictions in which the project operates that pertain to environmental and social matters, including those laws implementing host country obligations under international law; and • Identify the NCRPB and its project proponent’s main stakeholder groups and current stakeholder engagement activities.

43. All the projects that are categorized to have high impacts, i.e. E1 and S1, will be covered in these audits as long as disbursements have been made in the current or the previous year. For the remaining projects, approximately 25% of other projects will be selected; it will include donor-funded projects, and will necessarily include at least one project from different project types.

This audit would be carried out once the environment and social management cell (ESMC) of NCRPB gains expertise to manage and monitor and address all the safeguard related issues pertaining to different subprojects under implementation.

Annexure 1: Details of DPs under Badli Bypass Road

Percentage Total Total Acq. S. Name of the Father/ =(Acq x Village Land (in Land (in ownership No. Owner Husband 100) /Total Kanal) Marla) (In Marla) Land Daya Ram 1 Badli Jag Phul S/O Ram 4.17 83.33 62.99 76% Nath Narayan Satish 2 Badli 1 Singh S/O 4.17 83.33 48.33 58% Kumar Pyare Lal Dani Ram Badli 1 & Gyan 3 S/O Godha 21.20 424.00 242.00 57% 2 Chand Ram Manmohan 4 Badli 2 Singh (Smt. Jwala Prasad 2.65 53.00 29.50 56% Lakshmi) Hukum Singh Bheem 5 Badli 2 S/O Bharat 8.00 160.00 66.00 41% Singh Singh Ishwar Khushali S/O 6 Badli 2 30.00 600.00 244.00 41% Singh Harnand Daya Ram Sampoorn 7 Badli 1 S/O Ram 4.17 83.33 31.85 38% Singh Nath Shivcharan 8 Badli 2 Surajmal S/O Desh 24.00 480.00 157.00 33% Ram 9 Badli 2 Surat Singh Molar 80.00 1600.00 452.00 28% 10 Badli 2 Sahaj Ram Fullu 7.50 150.00 39.00 26% Subash S/O 11 Badli 1 Pradeep 11.11 222.22 47.00 21% Charan Singh Preet Singh Ashok 12 Badli 2 S/O Charan 48.00 960.00 167.00 17% Kumar Singh Subha 13 Badli 2 Chattar Singh 141.04 2820.74 468.94 17% Chand Ram Singh 14 Badli 1 Shri Om S/O Ram 41.67 833.33 136.33 16% Sawrup Lakhi S/O 15 Badli 1 Jagveer 41.67 833.33 136.33 16% Ram Sawrup 16 Badli 1 Sher Singh Chunni 44.00 880.00 138.00 16% 17 Badli 2 Chotu Ram Roop Ram 50.00 1000.00 146.88 15% Hardwari S/O 18 Badli 1 Krishan 6.94 138.89 19.48 14% Ram Sawrup Hardwari S/O 19 Badli 1 Sudhir 6.94 138.89 19.48 14% Ram Sawrup Hardwari S/O 20 Badli 1 Vijender 6.94 138.89 19.48 14% Ram Sawrup Hardwari S/O 21 Badli 1 Mahavir 13.89 277.78 38.95 14% Ram Sawrup

Percentage Total Total Acq. S. Name of the Father/ =(Acq x Village Land (in Land (in ownership No. Owner Husband 100) /Total Kanal) Marla) (In Marla) Land Ameer Singh Sukhvir 22 Badli 1 S/O Mahipal 30.56 611.11 75.25 12% Singh Singh 23 Badli 1 Somvir Saheb Singh 30.56 611.11 75.25 12% Bharma Dheerpal 24 Badli 2 Singh S/O 90.42 1808.33 202.00 11% Singh Methab Singh Ramehar S/O 25 Badli 1 Krishna 18.00 360.00 38.58 11% Sukh Chain Hukam Singh 26 Badli 1 Hawa Singh S/O Hari 11.11 222.22 23.50 11% Singh Sher Singh Suresh 27 Badli 1 S/O Heera 11.11 222.22 23.50 11% Kumar Lal Ramehar S/O 28 Badli 1 Dharm Pal 20.25 405.00 38.58 10% Sukh Chain Jai Ram Chander 29 Badli 1 9.00 180.00 16.08 9% Bhagwan S/O Ramehar Maher Matilal S/O 30 Badli 1 4.27 85.33 7.20 8% Singh Dalip Mahender Ratan S/O 31 Badli 1 34.00 680.00 56.84 8% Singh Lajee Kamal Umed Singh 32 Badli 2 32.00 640.00 51.00 8% Singh S/O Bhartu 33 Badli 2 Devidutt Gangaman 40.00 800.00 63.00 8% 34 Badli 1 Jiwan Singh Ram 120.00 2400.00 183.00 8% Chater Singh 35 Badli 1 Surender S/O Singh 41.67 833.33 63.00 8% Ram Nathu S/O 36 Badli 2 Hari Singh 96.00 1920.00 143.50 7% Ghanshyam 37 Badli 2 Ramehar Maamchand 166.67 3333.33 243.31 7% Narayan 38 Dariyapur Ramfal Singh S/O 24.00 480.00 35.00 7% Dualat Ram Maha Singh 39 Badli 1 Mange Ram 12.00 240.00 17.24 7% S/O Chunni Tek Chand 40 Badli 1 Dharmveer 125.00 2500.00 172.42 7% S/O Phulu 41 Badli 1 Ram Prasad Dalip 12.80 256.00 17.64 7% Saheb Singh 42 Badli 1 Satveer S/O Ratan 68.00 1360.00 92.59 7% Singh Ratan S/O 43 Badli 1 Seva Singh 34.00 680.00 41.91 6% Lajee 44 Badli 1 Ram Singh Ratan Singh 61.11 1222.22 75.25 6% 45 Badli 1 Balbir Singh Ratan Singh 30.56 611.11 37.63 6%

Percentage Total Total Acq. S. Name of the Father/ =(Acq x Village Land (in Land (in ownership No. Owner Husband 100) /Total Kanal) Marla) (In Marla) Land 46 Badli 1 Kartar Singh Ratan Singh 30.56 611.11 37.63 6% Ram 47 Badli 1 Kishan Sahai 88.00 1760.00 103.50 6% Swarup Matilal S/O 48 Badli 1 Devender 2.13 42.67 2.40 6% Dalip Matilal S/O 49 Badli 1 Krishan 2.13 42.67 2.40 6% Dalip Matilal S/O 50 Badli 1 Pratap 2.13 42.67 2.40 6% Dalip 51 Badli 1 Azad Matilal 2.13 42.67 2.40 6% 52 Mazra 2 Mange Ram Sheo Ratan 55.56 1111.11 60.67 5% 53 Mazra 2 Karan Singh Sri Chand 55.56 1111.11 60.67 5% Balveer Jawahar 54 Mazra 2 55.56 1111.11 60.67 5% Singh Singh Om Prakash Ashok 55 Badli 1 S/O Tuhi 72.00 1440.00 78.00 5% Kumar Ram Charan Singh 56 Badli 2 Sher Singh S/O Tek 48.00 960.00 52.00 5% Chand 57 Mazra 1 Dev Raj Rishal Singh 111.11 2222.22 119.00 5% Daya Ram 58 Badli 2 Hukumi S/O Ram 106.67 2133.33 114.00 5% Chand Bhoop 59 Badli 2 Ramji Lal 55.56 1111.11 58.77 5% Singh Rajender Ratan S/O 60 Badli 1 34.00 680.00 34.56 5% Singh Lajee Ravinder S/O 61 Badli 1 Rahul 34.00 680.00 34.56 5% Sultan Sate (Alias Balvir S/O 62 Badli 1 25K 500.00 25.33 5% Sunil) Chet Ram 63 Badli 1 Balvir Neki 84.00 1680.00 85.00 5% 64 Badli 1 Umed Singh Deeg Ram 52K 1040.00 50.67 5% Ram 65 Badli 1 Maha Singh 36.00 720.00 34.48 5% Krishan 66 Badli 2 Krishan Bhup Singh 166.67 3333.33 155.93 5% Kanaiya 67 Badli 2 Dayanand Datak S/O 8.00 160.00 7.00 4.38% Mamchand Daya 68 Badli 2 Hari Ram 166.67 3333.33 142.19 4.27% Kishan Narender Kumar 69 Dariyapur Sukhdev Raj 114.67 2293.33 97.33 4.24% (Bihari Trust) Smt Pushpa 70 Dariyapur Yog Nath 114.67 2293.33 97.33 4.24% Rani (Bihari

Percentage Total Total Acq. S. Name of the Father/ =(Acq x Village Land (in Land (in ownership No. Owner Husband 100) /Total Kanal) Marla) (In Marla) Land Trust) Vikas Kumar 71 Dariyapur Hari Singh 114.67 2293.33 97.33 4.24% (Bihari Trust) 72 Badli 1 Nathu Chander 166.67 3333.33 141.00 4.23% Mahender Neki S/O 73 Badli 1 224.00 4480.00 188.00 4.20% Singh Hans Ram Rati Ram S/O 74 Mazra 2 Rishi Pal 128.00 2560.00 103.00 4.02% Ram Singh Hardwari S/O 75 Badli 1 Sukhvir 48.61 972.22 38.95 4.01% Ram Sawrup 76 Badli 1 Amarjeet Raj Singh 44.00 880.00 34.50 3.92% Chandan Kanwar 77 Badli 1 Singh S/O Lal 250.00 5000.00 187.00 3.74% Singh Chand Bharma Jai Pal 78 Badli 2 Singh S/O 180.00 3600.00 132.00 3.67% Singh Methab Singh Ratan S/O 79 Badli 1 Vale 42.50 850.00 31.11 3.66% Lajee 80 Mazra 1 Om Prakash Bhim Singh 333.33 6666.67 237.00 3.56% Ishwar Chunni Lal 81 Badli 2 55.56 1111.11 39.33 3.54% Singh S/O Ramji Lal 82 Badli 2 Virender Kali 27.78 555.56 19.67 3.54% Hoshiyar Malkhan 83 Badli 1 Singh S/O 41.67 833.33 29.00 3.48% Kamal Baktawar Maha Singh 84 Badli 1 Kali Ram 72.00 1440.00 45.52 3.16% S/O Chunni 85 Badli 2 Sunde Ram Raj Singh 27.78 555.56 17.32 3.12% Amir Singh Jai 86 Mazra 2 S/O Tek 64.00 1280.00 36.00 2.81% Bhagwan Chand 87 Badli 1 Jangali Natha 166.67 3333.33 93.41 2.80% 88 Badli 1 Balvir Singh Hate Ram 111.67 2233.33 62.00 2.78% Ram Chander 89 Badli 1 Sonu 45.00 900.00 23.78 2.64% S/O Ramehar 90 Badli 1 Jai Lal Phullu 250.00 5000.00 127.00 2.54% 91 Badli 1 Hira Lal Sing Ram 125.00 2500.00 62.00 2.48% 92 Badli 2 Kanaiya Molah 83.33 1666.67 39.33 2.36% Muneesh S/O 93 Badli 1 Manjeet 4.17 83.33 1.92 2.30% Pyare Lal 94 Badli 2 Maha Singh Bhoru 166.67 3333.33 70.00 2.10% Ramjeevan 95 Badli 2 Ram Karan S/O 62.50 1250.00 25.60 2.05% Maharaam

Percentage Total Total Acq. S. Name of the Father/ =(Acq x Village Land (in Land (in ownership No. Owner Husband 100) /Total Kanal) Marla) (In Marla) Land Mehar Singh Ranveer 96 Badli 2 S/O Kure 72.00 1440.00 29.00 2.01% Singh Ram Ratan Singh 97 Badli 1 Dharm Pal S/O Balwant 250.00 5000.00 98.00 1.96% Singh Sheesh 98 Badli 1 Bhoop Singh 175.00 3500.00 68.00 1.94% Ram 99 Badli 2 Mange Ram Shri Ram 333.33 6666.67 120.00 1.80% Hoshiyar 100 Badli 1 Baktayar 166.67 3333.33 60.00 1.80% Singh Ranh Singh Raghuveer 101 Badli 2 S/O Ram 48.00 960.00 17.00 1.77% Singh Prasad 102 Badli 2 Devi Dayal Pyare lal 9.26 185.19 3.23 1.74% 103 Badli 1 Jage Ram Chandani 83.33 1666.67 29.00 1.74% 104 Badli 1 Ram Veer Anar Singh 55.56 1111.11 19.20 1.73% Badli 1 & 105 Charanji Baktayar 166.67 3333.33 57.07 1.71% 2 106 Badli 2 Tek Chand Jai Narayan 8.00 160.00 2.69 1.68% 107 Badli 1 Atar Singh Ratan Singh 250.00 5000.00 83.40 1.67% Gyan Singh 108 Badli 1 Param jeet S/O Tek 208.33 4166.67 68.21 1.64% Chand 109 Badli 2 Bagru Hari Ram 213.33 4266.67 65.89 1.54% 110 Badli 2 Kartar Singh Daya Kishan 40.00 800.00 12.33 1.54% Heera S/O 111 Badli 1 Veer Singh 166.67 3333.33 48.00 1.44% Jug Lal Anar Singh 112 Badli 1 Om Veer 111.11 2222.22 28.80 1.30% S/O Chunna 113 Dariyapur Suraj Bhan Shera 32.00 640.00 8.00 1.25% 114 Badli 2 Tireeth Bheem Singh 62.50 1250.00 15.36 1.23% Badli 1 & 115 Jai Singh Vazir Singh 107.92 2158.33 23.86 1.11% 2 Rishal 116 Badli 1 Ram Chand 12.80 256.00 2.52 0.98% Singh Randheer Satveer 117 Badli 1 Singh S/O 21.33 426.67 3.45 0.81% Singh Hukhmi Azad Singh Ranvir 118 Badli 1 S/O Tek 83.33 1666.67 12.67 0.76% Singh Chand Deepak 119 Badli 1 Ishwar Benilal 12.80 256.00 1.89 0.74% Benilal Satya 120 Badli 1 Dalel 12.80 256.00 1.89 0.74% Narayan Rajender S/O 121 Badli 2 Virender 166.67 3333.33 20.33 0.61% Lakhi Ram

Percentage Total Total Acq. S. Name of the Father/ =(Acq x Village Land (in Land (in ownership No. Owner Husband 100) /Total Kanal) Marla) (In Marla) Land Rajbir S/O 122 Badli 1 Dharmender 100.00 2000.00 11.47 0.57% Dhara Singh 123 Badli 1 Sukhbeer Dhara Singh 100.00 2000.00 11.47 0.57% Jagveer 124 Badli 1 Pushpender Singh S/O 100.00 2000.00 11.47 0.57% Dhara Singh 125 Badli 1 Ajay Dhara Singh 100.00 2000.00 11.47 0.57% 126 Badli 2 Hem Chand Ramji Lal 125.00 2500.00 14.33 0.57% Sultan 127 Badli 1 Bhoop Singh 145.83 2916.67 15.89 0.54% Singh 128 Badli 1 Naresh Atar Singh 12.80 256.00 1.26 0.49% Jai Ishwar Singh 129 Badli 1 416.67 8333.33 33.00 0.40% Bhagwan S/O Tej Singh Dhara Singh 130 Badli 1 Hem Chand 309.52 6190.48 24.00 0.39% S/O Ratan Devraj Rishal Singh 131 Mazra 2 80.00 1600.00 6.00 0.38% Singh S/O lok Ram Narayan Ranjeet Singh 132 Badli 2 56.00 1120.00 4.00 0.36% Singh S/O Phulu 133 Badli 2 Kesho Ram Sher Singh 800.00 16000.00 47.00 0.29% Sudhir 134 Badli 1 Aneet Singh 100.00 2000.00 5.73 0.29% Singh Mahender 135 Badli 1 Vijay Kumar Singh S/O 204K 4080.00 7.00 0.17% Ratan 136 Badli 2 Shri Ram Bhuwan 41.67 833.33 1.00 0.12% 137 Badli 2 Sher Singh Ram Singh 136.00 2720.00 3.00 0.11% Ganga Shah 138 Badli 2 Raje Ram 8.33 166.67 0.18 0.11% S/O Baktawar Shiv Ganga Shah 139 Badli 2 16.67 333.33 0.32 0.10% Narayan S/O Baktawar Ganga Shah 140 Badli 2 Sube Singh 16.67 333.33 0.32 0.10% S/O Baktawar %141 Badli 1 Hari Ram Sukh Chain 40.00 800.00 0.75 0.09% Gyani S/O 142 Badli 1 Dhani Ram 32.00 640.00 0.50 0.08% Salwant Gyani S/O 143 Badli 1 Dehi Ram 32.00 640.00 0.50 0.08% Salwant Subash Gyani S/O 144 Badli 1 64.00 1280.00 0.50 0.04% Chand Salwant Ganga Shah 145 Badli 2 Jai Narayan 41.67 833.33 0.18 0.02% S/O Baktawar 146 Badli 1 Pyare Lal Sri Chand 500.00 10000.00 1.00 0.01% Reliance 147 Badli 2 Reliance SEZ 711.44 SEZ Limited

Annexure 2: Details of Acquired Land and compensation paid in Badli Bypass

Annexure 3: Detailed valuation of affected Structure and trees in Badli Bypass

Annexure 4: Evidence for Payment made to DPs as compensation of acquired land under Badli Bypass

Annexure 5: Evidence for payment of compensation as assistances paid to DPs of Badli Bypass

Annexure 6: Details of DPs under Jhajjar Bypass Road

A. Complete List of Affected Households Road wise & Land acquisition (Total & Households) village wise (229 HH’s) BADLI-PELPA- SONDHI-YAKUBPUR ROAD (DISTT- JHAJJAR)

S.N Village Head Of Family Father/Husband Total Aquire Aquire Side Whether any structure Area of structure Amount of Significa Land Religio o Land d Land d Land of affected affected Structure nt Use n Owne (In (In Roa Yes/No Yes/No d (In Marla) Marla) d without Marla % Depreciati ) on & Salvage (in Rs.) 1.33333 No Agr. / Yes 29278 1 BADLI KAPTAN SINGH JILE SINGH 600 8 3 R BW (27m) Other HINDU - No 2 NIRANJAN ANAR SINGH 400 2 0.5 R No - AGR. HINDU RAJENDER No - No 0.5 - AGR. 3 RAVINDER SINGH SINGH 400 2 R HINDU 1.33333 No - No - AGR. 4 OM PRAKASH SAAR CHAND 600 8 3 R HINDU DHARAM 6.66666 No - No - AGR. 5 BAHADUR SINGH SINGH 360 24 7 L HINDU No - No 6 SMT. DHANNO KAWAL SINGH 560 7 1.25 L - AGR. HINDU No - No 7 RAMESHWAR BALWANT 320 23 7.1875 L - AGR. HINDU No - Yes 8 SATVEER NATHU RAM 160 20 12.5 R - AGR. HINDU No - Yes 9 JAI CHAND MAHA SINGH 80 10 12.5 L - AGR. HINDU No - No 10 BALWAN SINGH RATAN SINGH 400 23 5.75 L - AGR. HINDU 16.3043 No - Yes - AGR. 11 GAJE SINGH RAN SINGH 92 15 5 L HINDU 3.83333 No - No - AGR. 12 ATAR SINGH MANGE RAM 600 23 3 L HINDU No - Yes 13 DILBAG SINGH RAMSWAROOP 50 8 16 L - AGR. HINDU No - No 14 DHARA SINGH RATAN 400 9 2.25 - AGR. HINDU 6.66666 No - No - AGR. 15 KARMVEER MANGE RAM 180 12 7 L HINDU 1.66666 No - No - AGR. 16 SAMER SINGH HAR LAL 240 4 7 L HINDU

4.16666 No - No - AGR. 17 RANVEER SINGH SARDAR SINGH 480 20 7 L HINDU 5.33333 No - No - AGR. 18 GULAB SINGH MANGE RAM 600 32 3 L HINDU 5.17857 No No - AGR. 19 SUKHVEER HARDWARI 560 29 1 L - HINDU RANJEET No Yes 16.25 - AGR. 20 NARAYAN SINGH SINGH 240 39 R,L - HINDU No No 21 RANVEER AZAD SINGH 400 23 5.75 R - - AGR. HINDU 8.63636 No No - AGR. 22 DHARM PAL SHEESH RAM 440 38 4 R,L - HINDU 23 KARTAR SINGH SULTAN SINGH 500 15 3 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU 1.66666 No No - AGR. 24 SHREE OM HEERA 120 2 7 L - HINDU 3.22777 No No - AGR. 25 SURENDER CHATAR SINGH 360 11.62 8 R - HINDU No No 26 MOOL CHAND MANGAT 240 4.38 1.825 R - - AGR. HINDU No No 27 DHARAM PAL SUBE SINGH 1000 47 4.7 R,L - - AGR. HINDU 3.33333 No No - AGR. 28 KULVEER INDER RAJ 300 10 3 R - HINDU 9.16666 No No - AGR. 29 VIJAY PRAKASH CHANDGI 240 22 7 R - HINDU RAGUVEER No No 2 - AGR. 30 SINGH HEERA 400 8 R - HINDU 3.33333 No No - AGR. 31 MEHAR SINGH MOLAD 240 8 3 R - HINDU 8.94062 No Agr. Yes 51481 32 OMPRAKASH SHIV CHARAN 320 28.61 5 R BW (56m) /Other HINDU DHARAM No Agr. 2.8875 Yes 36364 33 PRAVESH SINGH 240 6.93 R BW (12m) /Other HINDU No Agr. 0.875 Yes 76589 34 KULDEEP ISHWAR SINGH 160 1.4 R BW (20m) /Other HINDU No No 35 VED PRAKASH TARA CHAND 200 8.75 4.375 R - - AGR. HINDU No No 36 ISHWAR RAMSWAROOP 400 21 5.25 R,L - - AGR. HINDU 3.33333 No No - AGR. 37 HARISH DEEP CHAND 360 12 3 R,L - HINDU No No 38 VIJENDER HEERA SINGH 240 4.95 2.0625 R - - AGR. HINDU No No 39 MANISH SURENDER 200 3 1.5 R - - AGR. HINDU

NARENDER No No 1.5 - AGR. 40 KUMAR MEER SINGH 200 3 R - HINDU No Yes 41 BUDH RAM RATI RAM 120 15 12.5 R - - AGR. HINDU DHARAM No No 3 - AGR. 42 KARAN SINGH SINGH 200 6 R - HINDU 43 PHOOL SINGH KAMAL SINGH 20 2 10 R No - - Yes AGR. HINDU No No 44 BALVEER NEKI 500 28 5.6 R - - AGR. HINDU 9.58333 No No - AGR. 45 SARDAR SINGH HARI RAM 240 23 3 R - HINDU 5.83333 No Agr. Yes 47816 46 SUNIL KUMAR KAPUR SINGH 240 14 3 R BW (19m) /Other HINDU No No 47 RAVI RAMPHAL 500 9 1.8 R - - AGR. HINDU (GAID No No Other - 48 MAADU DHARMSHALA ) 4 - Use HINDU COMMON No No Other - 49 ACCOUNT 8 - Use HINDU No No RELIANCE 98.76 L,R - - GRAM No No - PANCHAYAT 19 -

TOTAL LAND 823.4

No Agr./Oth 2.625 61914 50 PELPA ASHWANI KUMAR AMI CHAND 800 21 R,L Yes 22.7 er HINDU 14.1176 No Yes - AGR. 51 DHOOP SINGH RICH PAL 170 24 5 L - HINDU No No 52 DEEPAK KARTAR SINGH 160 10 6.25 L - - AGR. HINDU No No 53 HARI SINGH RAMCHAND 200 18 9 L - - AGR. HINDU No No 54 AMI CHAND BISHAMBAR 100 19 19 R - - AGR. HINDU 14.2857 No Yes - AGR. 55 HUKAM CHAND CHUNNI LAL 112 16 1 R - HINDU No Yes 56 BRAHM PRAKASH KAMAL SINGH 160 16 10 R - - AGR. HINDU No No 57 BHALE RAM MUNSHI RAM 160 11 6.875 R - - AGR. HINDU No No 58 PRAVEEN RAM DHARI 80 5 6.25 R - - AGR. HINDU No No 59 DALIP SINGH PRATHI 320 3 0.9375 R - - AGR. HINDU

4.81666 No Agr. Yes 24865 60 JAGRE SHYO SINGH 360 17.34 7 L BW (3.35m) /Other HINDU MAHAVEER 1.66666 Yes Agr./Oth Yes 857726 61 SINGH KANWAR LAL 360 6 7 L 294.93 er HINDU No 62 DHEERAJ RAM NARAYAN 640 7 1.09375 L No - - AGR. HINDU 5.90909 Yes Agr. Yes 91399 63 UMED SINGH KANWAL SINGH 440 26 1 R 69.35 /Other HINDU Yes Agr. 11 Yes 272272 64 PRADEEP MEER SINGH 100 11 R 203 /Other HINDU No No 65 SMT. KAMLESH DHARMVEER 60 3 5 R - - AGR. HINDU 3.61111 No No - AGR. 66 OMENDER SINGH DAYANAND 360 13 1 L - HINDU No No 67 RAM PHAL SHUBH RAM 600 12 2 R,L - - AGR. HINDU No Yes 68 MADAN LAL BISHAMBAR 100 12 12 R - - AGR. HINDU No Agr. 1 Yes 31358 69 MAHAVEER MEHAR CHAND 400 4 R 9.4 /Other HINDU No Agr. 1.875 Yes 41991 70 DEVI RAM RISAL SINGH 160 3 L 57 /Other HINDU Yes 71 NAND LAL AMIR SINGH 160 23.62 14.7625 R No - - AGR. HINDU HOSHYAR 7.81666 No Agr. Yes 29581 72 SATVEER SINGH 120 9.38 7 R BW (9m) /Other HINDU No No 73 SURAJ BHAN PRABHA 320 19 5.9375 R - - AGR. HINDU 5.71428 No No - RES. 74 INDER RAM CHAND 280 16 6 L - HINDU No Agr. 8.055 Yes 41196 75 MAHI PAL MANGE RAM 400 32.22 L 9.0 /Other HINDU No No 76 DALIP KHADDU 320 7 2.1875 R,L - - AGR. HINDU MAHENDER 7.19444 No No - AGR. 77 SINGH SHRI RAM 360 25.9 4 R,L - HINDU 78 TEK CHAND SEWAGA 400 4 1 L No - - No AGR. HINDU No No 79 KAPTAN SINGH PHULU 400 11 2.75 L - - AGR. HINDU No No 80 DEEPAK KUMAR RAGHU VEER 400 9 2.25 L - - AGR. HINDU 13.8775 No Yes - AGR. 81 RAGHUVEER SURAT SINGH 245 34 5 L - HINDU No Agr. 7.8125 Yes 43691 82 PHOOL KANWAR RAMEHAR 320 25 L 13.2 /Other HINDU No No 83 DEEP CHAND SUKHRAM 240 8 3.33333 L - - AGR. HINDU

3 No No 84 PHOOL SINGH CHUNNI LAL 40 1 2.5 L - - AGR. HINDU 85 DAYA RAM BAKHTAWAR 80 5 6.25 R No - - No AGR. HINDU No No 86 KANWAR LAL CHUTTAN 40 2 5 L - - AGR. HINDU GRAM No No - PANCHAYAT 9 - No No RELIANCE 3.74 - -

TOTAL LAND 502.2 4.04761 No No - AGR. 87 SONDHI MAHA SINGH BHOLA 420 17 9 R - HINDU 0.23809 No OTHER - 88 JILE SINGH UMED SINGH 420 1 5 R No - USE HINDU No Agr. 0.9375 Yes 58249 89 JAI PAL BALVEER 320 3 R 7.2 /Other HINDU No Agr. / 2.5 Yes 237588 90 AJIT SINGH PRAHLAD 320 8 R 30.66 Other HINDU 7.05882 No Agr./ Yes 246209 91 MEER SINGH GURDAYAL 340 24 4 R,L BW (180m) Other HINDU 6.66666 No No - AGR. 92 BHEEM SINGH MANSA 30 2 7 R - HINDU 8.57142 No No - AGR. 93 TARA CHAND MAUJI 700 60 9 R - HINDU No 94 JILE SINGH MOOL CHAND 640 25 3.90625 R No - - AGR. HINDU SUBHASH No 2.5 No - AGR. 95 RAM VEER CHAND 320 8 R - HINDU 2.85714 No No - AGR. 96 NEKI RAI SINGH 280 8 3 R - HINDU 15.8333 Yes No - AGR. 97 CHARAN SINGH SURAT SINGH 240 38 3 R - HINDU 98 ESHWAR RAM JAS 1280 26 2.03125 R No - - No AGR. HINDU 4.79166 No Agr. Yes 36105 99 KARAN SINGH CHOTU 480 23 7 L 13.5 /Other HINDU MAHENDER 3.52941 No Yes 27082 Other 100 SINGH DHULE CHAND 680 24 2 R,L BW (15m) HINDU 3.23529 No No - AGR. 101 DHARAM PAL RAM CHAND 680 22 4 R,L - HINDU No Agr. 3.6 Yes 171899 102 DHARAM SINGH SURAJ 500 18 L BW (140) /Other HINDU

2.70833 Yes Yes 112849 Other 103 HANS RAJ SULTAN SINGH 480 13 3 L 27.00 HINDU 0.45454 No No - AGR. 104 BAL VEER BHAGWANA 440 2 5 L - HINDU No 105 ANIL KUMAR DAYANAND 160 2 1.25 L Yes 10.09 40747 Other HINDU 0.35714 No Other - 106 JAI PRAKASH CHET RAM 280 1 3 R No - Use HINDU 1.07142 No Other - 107 JAI PRAKASH MAYA RAM 280 3 9 R No - Use HINDU No No Other - 108 HARI DAS SANT DAS 90.4 - Use GRAM No No - PANCHAYAT 138 - No No RELIANCE 114 - -

TOTALLAND 670.4 HINDU YAKUBPU No Yes 18 - AGR. 109 R HANS RAJ KAMLU 100 18 L - HINDU No No 110 MNGE RAM NATHWA 1920 11.4 0.59375 L - - AGR. HINDU 1.61979 No No - AGR. 111 KANSHI RAM HARNARAYAN 1920 31.1 2 L - HINDU 8.20833 No No - AGR. 112 CHIRANJI CHANDGI 240 19.7 3 L - HINDU No No 113 CHANDAN BISHAMBAR 100 0.4 0.4 L - - AGR. HINDU No No 114 HOSHYARI PARVATI 400 2.7 0.675 L - - AGR. HINDU No No 115 RAJENDER 400 8 2 L - - AGR. HINDU 11.4285 No Yes - AGR. 116 RAM CHAIL UDHMI 280 32 7 L - HINDU No No 117 KALU RAM BHAGIRATH 800 25 3.125 R - - AGR. HINDU RELIANCE 204.5 R No - - No GRAM No No - PANCHAYAT 4 -

356.8

BADLI-LADPUR- MUNIMPUR-DURINA ROAD (DISTT- JHAJJAR) Total Whether any structure Area of structure Signific Lan Religi Land Aquir Aquire affected affected ant d on Own ed d Land Sid Yes/No Yes/No Use ed (In Land (In e of Sr.N Father/ Marla (In Marla) Roa o. Village Head Of Family Husband ) Marla) % d LAAD No No AG 1 OM PRAKASH RAI SINGH 140 3.75 2.6785 R PUR - R. HINDU No No AG 2 BHIM SINGH SULTAN 120 7.36 6.1333 R - R. HINDU No No AG 3 RAVINDER RAM PHAL 140 3.69 2.6357 R - R. HINDU No No AG 4 SURJEET SUKHLAL 100 7.13 7.13 L - R. HINDU No No AG 5 JAGDISH RATAN 100 4.81 4.81 L - R. HINDU No Yes AG 6 DHARMENDER NARENDER 400 57 14.25 R,L - R. HINDU CHANDRABHA No No AG 7 SHER SINGH 400 11 2.75 R N - R. HINDU No No AG 8 KATAR SINGH MAAN SINGH 160 15 9.375 L - R. HINDU MAHENDER No No AG 9 BANWARI 160 12 7.5 L SINGH - R. HINDU No Yes AG 10 RAM CHANDER MIT LAL 160 20 12.5 R - R. HINDU OM PRAKASH No No AG 11 DISPUTED 8 ETC. - R. HINDU No No AG 12 RAM RATI ETC DISPUTED 3 - R. HINDU PREM SINGH No No AG 13 DISPUTED 1 ETC. - R. HINDU RELIANCE 102.06 R-L No - No GRAM No No AG 13 - PANCHAYAT R. TOTAL LAND 268.8 No MUNIM No No AG 14 DIL BAG SINGH SHRI CHAND 300 11.14 3.7133 L PUR - R. HINDU

No No AG 15 SHER SINGH CHOTU 140 7.6 5.4285 L - R. HINDU No No AG 16 KATARE BAKHTAWAR 140 0.26 0.185 L - R. HINDU No No AG 17 KRISHAN HIRA NAND 1000 63.2 6.32 L - R. HINDU 1.0415 No No AG 18 OM DUTT KANHIYA 3200 33.33 R,L 63 - R. HINDU 2.0834 No No AG 19 GANPAT KISHAN LAL 3200 66.67 R,L 38 - R. HINDU GRAM No Oth 5 Yes 8.06 PANCHAYAT er TOTAL LAND 187.2

SUBANA-SAROLA- AHRI ROAD (DISTT- JHAJJAR) Whether Area of Amount Signifi any structure of cant structure affected Structure Yes/ Total affected without No Land Yes/No Depreciati Owned Aquired Side on & Head Of Father/Hus (In Land (In Aquired Land of Salvage Land S.No Village Family band Marla) Marla) (In Marla) % Road (in Rs.) Use Religion JAI 1 SAROLA SMT. SUSHILA 140 6 4.285714286 R No - - No RES. HINDU PRAKASH RAM 2 ROSHAN LAL 480 59 12.29166667 R No - - Yes AGR. HINDU KUMAR 3 TARA CHAND DEEP RAM 320 37 11.5625 R No - - Yes AGR. HINDU SUMER 4 DHARAM RAJ 1142 12 1.050788091 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH 5 MAHA SINGH MANSA 1280 11 0.859375 L No - - No AGR. HINDU RAM 6 RATAN LAL 120 0.57 0.475 L No - - No AGR. HINDU NARAYAN 7 AMAR SINGH RANJEET 160 0.57 0.35625 L No - - No AGR. HINDU

BALWANT 8 SHRI KISHAN 1600 3.38 0.21125 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH 9 NEKI SUKH RAM 200 0.84 0.42 L No - - No AGR. HINDU DHARAM 10 RAM VEER 160 0.84 0.525 L No - - No AGR. HINDU VEER JOGINDER 11 JILE SINGH 120 1.8 1.5 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH 12 KRISHAN PATRAM 400 8 2 L No - - No AGR. HINDU 13 OM PRAKASH MAHAVEER 260 4 1.538461538 R No - - No AGR. HINDU 14 NEKI AMRIT 160 1.9 1.1875 R No - - No AGR. HINDU Room 36312 RAM AGR./ 15 RAM NIWAS 40 2.2 5.5 R Yes (6.25 Yes HINDU PRASAD Other sqm) 16 RAJ KUMAR BUDH RAM 60 0.6 1 R No - - No AGR. HINDU 17 RAMEHAR LAKSMAN 260 48 18.46153846 R No - - Yes AGR. HINDU MANOJ 18 DAYANAND 40 2.14 5.35 R No - - No AGR. HINDU KUMAR PHOOL 19 KAPUR SINGH 300 3 1 R No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH 20 KARAM VEER PHULLA 130 3 2.307692308 R No - - No AGR. HINDU 21 ROSHAN LAL SHRI CHAND 360 0.56 0.155555556 R No - - No AGR. HINDU 22 RAMPHOOL PRABHU 1314 12 0.913242009 R No - - No AGR. HINDU RAM 23 SATVEER 160 11 6.875 R No - - No AGR. HINDU CHANDER BALVEER 24 RAJ SINGH 120 5 4.166666667 R No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH SATYA 25 RAGHUVEER 480 11 2.291666667 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU NARAYAN 26 JAGMAAL RAM RAKHA 600 7.5 1.25 L No - - No AGR. HINDU BRAHM SHIV 27 80 7.5 9.375 L No - - No AGR. HINDU PRAKASH CHARAN

28 RATAN SURAJ 1200 50 4.166666667 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU 29 DAYARAM MULA 320 3 0.9375 L No - - No AGR. HINDU 30 RAGHUVEER DIGHA 440 35 7.954545455 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU 31 DHARAM PAL BEGHA 100 16 16 R,L No - - Yes AGR. HINDU Shed 125216 AGR./O 32 RAM SINGH SHYO DAN 414 21 5.072463768 R Yes (48.95 No HINDU ther sqm) 33 RAMESHWAR SHYO RAM 740 18 2.432432432 R No - - No AGR. HINDU SHYO 34 MAHA SINGH 240 34 14.16666667 R,L No - - Yes AGR. HINDU KARAN NARENDER ESHWAR 35 340 54 15.88235294 R No No - Yes AGR. HINDU SINGH SINGH PHOOL 36 ROSHAN LAL 160 15 9.375 R No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH MAHENDER MEHAR 37 720 3 0.416666667 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH SINGH 38 ROHTASH CHIRANJI 700 3 0.428571429 L No - - No AGR. HINDU GRAM 22 No - - No AGR. PANCHAYAT TOTAL 534.4 LAND ISREHR LAKSMI BW 23750 AGR./O 39 RAJ KARAN 620 21 3.387096774 L Yes No HINDU A DUTT (5.32m) ther 40 DAYA RAM BHAGWANA 620 9 1.451612903 L No - - No AGR. HINDU 41 SATYAWAN SARDARA 620 8.1 1.306451613 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SMT.SUMAN JOGINDER 42 60 0.9 1.5 L No - - No AGR. HINDU YADAV SINGH TOTAL 39 - LAND KHUDD KRISHAN 43 RAMEHAR 960 88 9.166666667 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU AN KUMAR

GANGA 44 SUKH LAL 240 13 5.416666667 R No - - No AGR. HINDU SAHAY DHARAM 45 CHOTU 220 22 10 R No No - Yes AGR. HINDU SINGH 46 MANSA JAGRAM 140 16 11.42857143 R No No - Yes AGR. HINDU JAI 47 ANAR SINGH 120 20 16.66666667 L No No - Yes AGR. HINDU BHAGWAN MAM 48 RAWAT 340 61 17.94117647 L No No - Yes AGR. HINDU CHAND 49 ASHOK RAMEHAR 160 24 15 L No No - Yes AGR. HINDU MEHAR 50 RANVEER 240 22 9.166666667 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH SHAM LAT 51 MALESIAN 11.8 No - - No RES. HINDU TOLA TOTAL 277.8 LAND ESHWAR 52 AHRI JUGTI 922 11 1.193058568 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH 53 SMT. KAILA MAMAN 300 20 6.666666667 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU KARTAR RATAN 54 200 7 3.5 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH SINGH DHARAM SAMAY 55 600 27.6 4.6 R,L No - - No AGR. HINDU VEER SINGH 56 SUBE SINGH CHANDGI 300 7 2.333333333 R No - - No AGR. HINDU 57 SATISH KAMLE 180 7 3.888888889 R No - - No AGR. HINDU MAANGE 58 BEG RAJ 300 7 2.333333333 R No - - No AGR. HINDU RAM 59 STVEER BHAGWANA 720 28 3.888888889 L No - - No AGR. HINDU MEER 60 DHOOMAL 800 14 1.75 R No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH KATAAR 61 VIJAI SINGH 640 7 1.09375 L No - - No AGR. HINDU SINGH

62 MAHEBDER JILE SINGH 500 7 1.4 L No - - No AGR. HINDU HUKAM 63 HARI SINGH 300 7 2.333333333 L No - - No AGR. HINDU CHAND 64 OM PRAKASH RAMEHAR 720 22 3.055555556 L No - - No AGR. HINDU MAM 65 SUBE SINGH 824 51 6.189320388 L No - - No AGR. HINDU CHAND 66 RAM PHOOL HARDWARI 500 7 1.4 L No - - No AGR. HINDU 67 SATPAL PRATHI 320 14 4.375 L No - - No AGR. HINDU 7 GRAM 219 L No - - No MEHRA PANCHAYAT NI TOTAL 462.6 LAND

MUBARAK PUR-MUNDA KHERA- ISMILE PUR-GHALIB PUR ROAD (DISTT- JHAJJAR)

Whether any structure Area Amount Signific Total affected of of ant Land Aquir Yes/No struct Structure Yes/ Own ed Aquire Sid ure without No ed Land d Land e affect Deprecia (In (In (In of ed tion & Lan Sr. Head Of Father/Husb Marl Marla Marla) Ro Salvage d Religi No Village Family and a) ) % ad (in Rs.) Use on MUNDA MALKHAN - - No AGR HIND 1 AMAN SINGH 240 21 8.75 L No KHERA SINGH . U - - Yes AGR HIND 2 PRATAP HARI RAM 60 6 10 L No . U - - No AGR HIND 3 JAI NARAYAN BHIM SINGH 160 1.66 1.0375 L No . U DARIYAB CHARAN - - No AGR HIND 4 40 0.62 1.55 L No SINGH SINGH . U PURUSHOTTA - - No AGR HIND 5 SATVEER 40 1.72 4.3 L No M . U 5.7142 - - No AGR HIND 6 AJIT SINGH RAM KARAN 140 8 L No 86 . U BW 49724 Yes AGR CHANDRA (62m) ./ 7 SHRI CHAND 80 11 13.75 L Yes BHAN Oth HIND er U KRISHAN - - Yes AGR 8 NANAK 60 9 15 L No BC KUMAR .

RAM 6.8055 - - No AGR HIND 9 HARI RAM 720 49 R No NARAYAN 56 . U Room 54881 No AGR RAM 0.9416 13.94 ./ 10 VIJENDER 120 1.13 R Yes KUMAR 67 sqm Oth HIND er U 3.2791 - - No AGR HIND 11 OM PRAKASH RATI RAM 240 7.87 R No 67 . U DHARA - - No AGR HIND 12 DAYA RAM 400 10 2.5 R,L No SINGH . U CHARAN KEHAR 2.7777 - - No AGR HIND 13 360 10 R,L No SINGH SINGH 78 . U BALVEER SARUP - - No AGR HIND 14 400 15 3.75 L No SINGH SINGH . U KANWAL 13.846 - - Yes AGR HIND 15 RAJENDER 65 9 L No SINGH 15 . U - - Yes AGR HIND 16 DILBAG LAL CHAND 40 7 17.5 L No . U RELIANCE 3.2 L No - - No GRAM - - No 175 No PANCHAYAT TOTAL 346.2 LAND SATISH DIWAN 0.4842 - - No AGR HIND 17 ISMILE PUR 3717 18 R No KUMAR CHAND 62 . U MAHENDER - - No AGR HIND 18 SHIMLA 100 8 8 R No SINGH . U 0.8333 - - No AGR HIND 19 CHET RAM RAM SINGH 300 2.5 R No 33 . U - - No AGR HIND 20 SUKH VEER BODAN 240 4.8 2 R No . U 21 MAHA SINGH ROSHAN LAL 140 23 16.428 R,L No - - Yes AGR HIND

57 . U 15.442 - - Yes AGR HIND 22 TEJ PAL BADLE 140 21.62 R,L No 86 . U RAM - - No AGR HIND 23 LAL MANN 500 28.56 5.712 L No NARAYAN . U - - No AGR HIND 24 SHRI OM ABHAY RAM 400 12.34 3.085 L No . U - - No AGR HIND 25 SATVEER HARDWARI 400 8.44 2.11 L No . U 6.9583 - - No AGR HIND 26 SEWA RAM GULJARI 360 25.05 L No 33 . U RELIANCE 26.71 No - - No TOTAL 179.0

LAND 2