Precambrian plate tectonics: Criteria and evidence Peter A. Cawood, Tectonics Special Research Centre, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia,
[email protected]; Alfred Kröner, Tectonics Special Research Centre, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia, and Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Mainz, 55099 Mainz, Germany,
[email protected]; Sergei Pisarevsky, Tectonics Special Research Centre, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia,
[email protected] ABSTRACT rocks) or differences between modern and ancient rock associa- Paleomagnetic, geochemical, and tectonostratigraphic data tions (e.g., komatiites generally only found in the Archean) and establish that plate tectonics has been active since at least structural styles, and cite temporal changes in Earth’s heat flow 3.1 Ga. Reliable paleomagnetic data demonstrate differential as an underlying cause for these differences (e.g., Davies, 1999). horizontal movements of continents in Paleoproterozoic and Such comparisons ignore or minimize the significant similarities Archean times. Furthermore, the dispersal and assembly of in data sets between modern and ancient rock sequences and, by supercontinents in the Proterozoic requires lateral motion of inference, tectonic processes (Windley, 1995). lithosphere at divergent and convergent plate boundaries. Well- preserved ophiolites associated with island-arc assemblages and CRITERIA Establishing evidence for or against the operation of plate modern-style accretion tectonics occur in the Paleoproterozoic tectonics requires a clear understanding of its distinctive and Trans-Hudson orogen of the Canadian Shield, the Svecofen- unique features, which are preserved within the rock record. nian orogen of the Baltic Shield and in the Mazatzal-Yavapai We consider the most crucial feature to be the differential hori- orogens of southwestern Laurentia.