Rajya Sabha —— List of Business

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rajya Sabha —— List of Business RAJYA SABHA —— LIST OF BUSINESS Friday, July 23, 2021 _______ 11 A.M. ——— MOTION FOR ELECTION TO THE COCONUT DEVELOPMENT BOARD, KOCHI SHRI NARENDRA SINGH TOMAR to move the following Motion:— “That in pursuance of clause (e) of sub-section (4) of Section 4 of the Coconut Development Board Act, 1979 (No.5 of 1979), read with clauses (i) and (ii) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 4 of the Coconut Development Board Rules, 1981, this House do proceed to elect, in such manner as the Chairman may direct, one Member from amongst the Members of the House to be a member of the Coconut Development Board.” ———— #QUESTIONS QUESTIONS entered in separate lists to be asked and answers given. ———— (FROM 2.30 P.M. TO 5.00 P.M.) PRIVATE MEMBERS’ LEGISLATIVE BUSINESS Bills for introduction 1. DR. KIRODI LAL MEENA to move for leave to introduce a Bill to The Uniform Civil provide for the constitution of the National Inspection and Investigation Code in India Bill, Committee for preparation of Uniform Civil Code and its implementation 2020. throughout the territory of India and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. ALSO to introduce the Bill. 2. SHRI V. VIJAYASAI REDDY to move for leave to introduce a Bill The Right of further to amend the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, Children to Free 2009. and Compulsory Education ALSO to introduce the Bill. (Amendment) Bill, 2020. 3. SHRI V. VIJAYASAI REDDY to move for leave to introduce a Bill The Constitution further to amend the Constitution of India. (Amendment) Bill, 2020 (insertion of ALSO to introduce the Bill. new article 21B). # At 12 Noon. 14 The Indian Penal 4. SHRI V. VIJAYASAI REDDY to move for leave to introduce a Bill Code (Amendment) further to amend the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Bill, 2021. ALSO to introduce the Bill. The Constitution 5. SHRI Y.S. CHOWDARY to move for leave to introduce a Bill further (Amendment) Bill, to amend the Constitution of India. 2020 (insertion of new articles 12A ALSO to introduce the Bill. and 12B). The High Court of 6. SHRI PRASANNA ACHARYA to move for leave to introduce a Bill Orissa to provide for the establishment of a permanent Bench of the High Court of (Establishment of a Orissa in Western Odisha. Permanent Bench in Western Odisha) ALSO to introduce the Bill. Bill, 2020. The Constitution 7. DR. AMAR PATNAIK to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to (Amendment) Bill, amend the Constitution of India. 2020 (amendment of article 51A). ALSO to introduce the Bill. The Lokpal And 8. DR. AMAR PATNAIK to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to Lokayuktas amend the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013. (Amendment) Bill, 2021. ALSO to introduce the Bill. The Central 9. DR. AMAR PATNAIK to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to Educational amend the Central Educational Institutions (Reservation in Admission) Act, Institutions 2006. (Reservation in Admission) Amendment Bill, ALSO to introduce the Bill. 2021. The Constitution 10. SHRI VAIKO to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to amend (Amendment) Bill, the Constitution of India. 2020 (omission of ALSO to introduce the Bill. article 248). The Constitution 11. DR. VIKAS MAHATME to move for leave to introduce a Bill further (Amendment) Bill, to amend the Constitution of India. 2020 (amendment of Seventh ALSO to introduce the Bill. Schedule). The Epidemic 12. SHRI DEREK O’ BRIEN to move for leave to introduce a Bill to Diseases provide for the effective prevention, preparedness and management of epidemics (Prevention, and for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. Preparedness and Management) Bill, ALSO to introduce the Bill. 2021. 15 13. SHRI P. WILSON to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to The Constitution amend the Constitution of India. (Amendment) Bill, 2020 (substitution ALSO to introduce the Bill. of new article for article 130). 14. SHRI P. WILSON to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to The Medical amend the Dentists Act, 1948 and the National Medical Commission Act, 2019. Education Laws (Amendment) Bill, ALSO to introduce the Bill. 2021. 15. DR. SASMIT PATRA to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to The Cigarettes and amend the Cigarettes and other Tobacco Products (Prohibition of Advertisement other Tobacco and Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) Products Act, 2003. (Prohibition of Advertisement and ALSO to introduce the Bill. Regulation of Trade and Commerce, Production, Supply and Distribution) (Amendment) Bill, 2021. 16. DR. SASMIT PATRA to move for leave to introduce a Bill further to The Indian Penal amend the Indian Penal Code, 1860. Code (Amendment) Bill, 2021. ALSO to introduce the Bill. 17. SHRI PRASHANTA NANDA to move for leave to introduce a Bill The Criminal Laws further to amend the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Code of Criminal (Amendment) Bill, Procedure, 1973. 2021. ALSO to introduce the Bill. 18. SHRI SUBHASH CHANDRA SINGH to move for leave to introduce The Code of a Bill further to amend the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. Criminal Procedure ALSO to introduce the Bill. (Amendment) Bill, 2021. 19. DR. BANDA PRAKASH further to provide for welfare of orphan The Orphan Child children and mattters connected therewith. (Welfare and Reservations) Bill, ALSO to introduce the Bill. 2021. 20. SHRI TIRUCHI SIVA to move for leave to introduce a Bill to provide The Women's for reservation of posts for women in establishments and for matters connected (Reservation in therewith and incidental thereto. Workplace) Bill, 2021. ALSO to introduce the Bill. 16 Bills for consideration and passing @The Safeguarding 21. SHRI PARTAP SINGH BAJWA to move that the Bill to provide for and Adjudicating the establishment of an autonomous body, called the Safeguarding and Farmers' Economic Adjudicating Farmers' Economic Rights Commission, to help improve the Rights Commission economic conditions of farmers, reduce their indebtedness and for all matters Bill, 2018. connected therewith or incidental thereto, be taken into consideration. ALSO to move that the Bill be passed. The Population 22. SHRI RAKESH SINHA to move that the Bill to revitalize efforts Regulation Bill, towards promoting the small family norms of up to two children per eligible 2019. couple; to ensure healthy birth spacing through measures related to augmenting the availability, accessibility and affordability of quality reproductive health services, and other relevant inter-sectoral development instruments by the Central and the State Governments; to achieve the goal of stabilization of population commensurate with the emerging social, economic, health, nutritional, epidemiological, environmental and other developmental needs of the national economy; to recognize the implications of population momentum on the prospects of national progress in the long run, propelled through its young and dynamic population age-structure; to ameliorate and harness the demographic potential in the sustainable manner and help to engulf the prevailing demographic and socio-economic disparities across population groups and regions, and render equal opportunities for all, irrespective of age, sex, religion, caste, class, race, residence, language etc. to achieve the fullest development potential and for matters connected therewith and incidental thereto, be taken into consideration. ALSO to move that the Bill be passed. The State 23. DR. SASMIT PATRA to move that the Bill to provide for the Reorganization establishment of a Commission for reorganization of States within the Commission Bill, geographical boundaries of the Union of India with an objective to preserve and 2019. strengthen the unity of the India keeping into consideration, the linguistic, cultural, financial, economic and administrative viability of reorganization of a State corresponding to the safety and welfare of the citizens of the nation, be taken into consideration. ALSO to move that the Bill be passed. The Constitution 24. SHRI VAIKO to move that the Bill further to amend the Constitution (Amendment) Bill, of India, be taken into consideration. 2019 (amendment ALSO to move that the Bill be passed. of article 343). The Constitution 25. SHRI P. WILSON to move that the Bill further to amend the (Amendment) Bill, Constitution of India, be taken into consideration. 2019 (amendment of articles 217 and ALSO to move that the Bill be passed. 224). NEW DELHI; DESH DEEPAK VERMA, July 20, 2021 Secretary-General. @ Subject to receiving of the President’s recommendation under article 117(3) of the Constitution by 11.00 A.M. on Friday, the 23rd July, 2021. 17 .
Recommended publications
  • THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By
    1 AS INTRODUCED IN LOK SABHA Bill No. 218 of 2016 THE CONSTITUTION (AMENDMENT) BILL, 2016 By SHRI SADASHIV LOKHANDE, M.P. A BILL further to amend the Constitution of India. BE it enacted by Parliament in the Sixty-seventh Year of the Republic of India as follows:— 1. This Act may be called the Constitution (Amendment) Act, 2016. Short title. 2 Omission of 2. Article 44 of the Constitution shall be omitted. article 44. Insertion of 3. After Part IVA of the Constitution, the following Part and articles thereunder shall be new Part IVB. inserted, namely:— "PART IVB UNIFORM CIVIL LAW 5 Definition. 51B. In this Part, unless the context otherwise requires, "the State" has the same meaning as in Part III. Uniform civil 51C. The State shall, within one year of coming into force of this Act, secure for the code for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.". citizens. STATEMENT OF OBJECTS AND REASONS The founding fathers of the Constitution while framing the Constitution of India have been instrumental in including uniform civil laws for all citizens throughout the country. It was therefore included as a Directive Principle of State Policy under article 44 which requires the State to secure for the citizens of India a Uniform Civil Code throughout the territory of India. However, even after sixty-six years of the framing of the Constitution, the Uniform Civil Code is yet to be enacted. India is a country of multi-religions and every religion has its own set of personal laws to govern their respective personal matters like marriages, adoption, succession, etc.
    [Show full text]
  • Discerning the Need for an Uniform Civil Code (UCC)
    International Journal of Economic Research Volume 16 • Number 1 • 2019, ISSN 0972-9380 available at http: www.serialsjournal.com Discerning the Need for an Uniform Civil Code (UCC) G.S. Suvethan* , R. Niranjan** and Tejashwini Kuna*** *Email ID: [email protected] **Email ID: [email protected], Mount Carmel College (MCC) - III-Year BA.(P.E.S) ***Email ID: [email protected] Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University, School of Excellence In Law (SOEL) – III-Year B.com.,LLB (Hons) SALUS POPULI SUPREMA LEX ESTO Abtracts: “Let the good of the people be the supreme.” This paper focuses on how an Uniform Civil Code (UCC) can increase the possibility of a better nation. India is replete with a large number of religions and cultures enriching the diversity. These differnces have played a crucial role in effecting legal and judicial transformation, however certain religious squabbles across the spectrum of various scopes have tended to converge on different sets of conflicts , but continue to diverge in the name of religion which sometimes ameliorate modern India as well as drown her. Article 44 of the Indian Constitution as well as numerous judicial precedents formed in cases such as the Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum 1, etc. considered by many as a pioneer judgement in India had revamped the entire situation. But on a broader perspective, what is the next change in the understanding of all religions? For this a clear cut research and definition of UCC and how it can be used while safe guarding all religions is the need of the hour.
    [Show full text]
  • How Can Families Be Imagined Beyond Kinship and Marriage?
    ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 How Can Families be Imagined Beyond Kinship and Marriage? ARIJEET GHOSH DIKSHA SANYAL Arijeet Ghosh ([email protected]) is a project officer at Commonwealth Human Rights Initiative, New Delhi. Diksha Sanyal ([email protected]) is at School of Oriental and African Studies, London. Vol. 54, Issue No. 45, 16 Nov, 2019 The Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019 and the Surrogacy Regulation Bill, 2019 reinforce the idea of family as a patriarchal, heterosexual and casteist institution and fail to account for other models of "chosen families'"and intimacies that co-exist in India. Given that the Supreme Court has recognised the right to intimacy as a core component of autonomy and privacy, the article makes a case for the law to fundamentally rethink the way it regulates personal relationships and in doing so, adopt a more functional" approach. On 5 August 2019, the Lok Sabha passed the Transgender Persons (Protection of Rights) Bill, 2019 (hereinafter the transgender bill, 2019) and the Surrogacy (Regulation) Bill, 2019 (hereinafter the surrogacy bill, 2019) without due deliberations. These bills which reinforce patriarchal, heteronormative, and casteist values of the "great Indian family," if passed by the Rajya Sabha, could soon become a reality. In this piece, the authors critique the predominant understanding of the family inscribed in these bills as one based solely on marriage, blood, or adoption. The bills do not acknowledge other forms of chosen families and intimacies that coexist in the Indian society. Through an ISSN (Online) - 2349-8846 analysis of various existing judicial precedents and recently enacted laws, the authors argue that the legislature needs to rethink how the said laws regulate interpersonal relationships.
    [Show full text]
  • Assistant Professor of Sociology College of Humanities and Social
    Role Name Affiliation National Coordinator Subject Coordinator Prof. Sujata Patel Department of Sociology, University of Hyderabad Paper Coordinator Anurekha Chari Wagh Department of Sociology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Content Writer Debjani Chakravarthy Assistant Professor of Sociology College of Humanities and Social Sciences Utah Valley University Content Reviewer Anurekha Chari Wagh Department of Sociology, University of Pune Language Editor Anurekha Chari Wagh Department of Sociology, Savitribai Phule Pune University Technical Conversion Module Structure: Section 1: The Legacy of Colonialism and the Civil Code The module is structured into three sections followed by a conclusion. Section 2: The Ongoing Debate on Uniform Civil Code Section 3: Basic Concepts Items Description of Module Subject Name Sociology Paper Name Sociology of Gender Module Name/ Title Uniform Civil Code 1 Module ID Pre-requisites 1. Some background on modern Indian history and the Constitution of India. 2. Understanding of the terms “law,” “religion,” and “gender.” 3. Understanding ofdemocracy and religious fundamentalism. Objectives 1. Learning about the Uniform Civil Code in India—its history, political background, and effect on gender relations. 2. Learning about the current debates and multiple perspectives on the controversial directive principle. 3. Learning about the politics of lawmaking, communalism and secularism and their impact on women. Keywords Civil code; Colonial modernity; Feminist Jurisprudence; Religious and minority rights; Fundamental rights and directive principles in Indian Constitution. 2 Uniform Civil Code Introduction Uniform Civil Code, a directive principle in the Indian Constitution has been the theme of one of the most intense, intriguing and widespread debate that emerged in India‘s public life right from the juncture that the constitution was adopted in 1950.
    [Show full text]
  • The Prevention and Protection of Women from (Publicly Dehumani
    University Faculty Details Page on DU Web-site Title Dr. (Mrs.) First Name ALOK Last Name SHARMA Photograph Designation ASSISTANT PROFESSOR Department LAW CENTRE-I, FACULTY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, DELHI-110007 Address (Campus) NORTH CAMPUS, CHATTRA MARG, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, DELHI-110007 (Residence) III- A/84, NEHRU NAGAR, GHAZIABAD, U.P. Phone No (Campus) 91-11-27667991 (Residence)optional Mobile 9811448465 Fax Email [email protected] Web-Page Education Subject Institution Year Details Ph.D. FACULTY OF LAW, D.U. 2016 Thesis topic: The Legal & Social Audit of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005: with special reference to NCT, Delhi. LL.M. FACULTY OF LAW, D.U. 2003 Thesis topic: Dissertation ‘Recognition of Womanhood by Indian judiciary after Mathura Era’. LL.B. CAMPUS LAW CENTRE, D.U. 1999 Subjects: LAW M.A. ANNAMALAI UNIVERSITY 1996 Subjects: ENGLISH Career Profile Organisation / Institution Designation Duration Role LAW CENTRE-I Assistant Professor 12 YEARS Teaching 2004- TILL NOW Research Interests / Specialization Jurisprudence, Criminal Law, Criminology, Contract Law, Clinical Education Teaching Experience ( Subjects/Courses Taught) LL.B. Law of Contract, Criminal law, Indian Legal System, Jurisprudence, Socio-Economic offences, Clinical Education, Negotiation, Mediation and Arbitration, and Moot Court and Internship LL.M. Comparative Criminal Procedure and Evidence, Rehabilitative and Correctional Techniques, White Colour Crimes and Corporate Crimes Honors & Awards 1. I have drafted and presented that draft Bill (Legislation), “The Prevention and Protection of Women from (Publicly Dehumanization and Stigmatization) Atrocities Bill, 2014” for the National Commission for Women, Government of India, India. 2. Conducted as Coordinator the 13th Youth Parliament Competition, 2016 organised by the Ministry of Parliamentary Affairs, Government of India on 24th September, 2016 in the www.du.ac.in Page 1 Law Centre I, Faculty of Law, University of Delhi.
    [Show full text]
  • India's Quest for Secular Identity and Feasibility of a Uniform Civil Code
    Summer Issue 2017 ILI Law Review Vol. I INDIA’S QUEST FOR SECULAR IDENTITY AND FEASIBILITY OF A UNIFORM CIVIL CODE Harshita Vatsayanï I Introduction ……………………………………………………… 30 - 32 II Secularism- Concept and its various forms. …………………… 32 - 41 III Secularism versus secularization. ………………………………. 41 - 42 IV Debate surrounding uniform civil code ………………………... 42 - 44 V Promotes national integration ……………………….................. 44 - 46 VI Promotion of gender equality ………………………................... 47 - 53 VII Uniform civil code as a means to achieve clarity, simplicity and 53 - 60 intelligibility in personal laws ……………………………............ VIII Conclusion and suggested manner in which UCC should be 61 - 62 enforced …………………………………………………………... I Introduction AT A time when recrudescence of communal violence keeps on rocking the body politic of India every now and then, it is important to understand secularism in its pristine form as advocated by Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru, one of the primary architects of the modern Indian state and the builder of India’s secular, democratic polity. As the question of secularism today has aroused a lot of controversy and in the name of nationalism many of our leaders support policies that in practice boil down to communalism and appeasement of the communalists, it seems very essential to go back to the Nehruvian model of secularism and to re- examine at the level of research, India’s quest for secular identity. The need to study the secular ideal becomes all the more important considering the raging contemporary debate about proscribing triple talaq and polygamy and the unflinching ï LL.M. Student , Indian Law Institute, New Delhi. 30 Summer Issue 2017 ILI Law Review Vol. I commitment and determination of the new political dispensation at the Centre to adopt a Uniform Civil Code (UCC) for the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Article 44 Uniform Civil Code Aanshi Gurjar Student, Indore Institute of Law, Indore, Madhya Pradesh
    Gurjar Aanshi; International Journal of Advance Research and Development (Volume3, Issue7) Available online at: www.ijarnd.com Article 44 uniform civil code Aanshi Gurjar Student, Indore Institute of Law, Indore, Madhya Pradesh ABSTRACT The researcher has done the research on the topic Article 44- uniform civil code. Article 44 of the Indian constitution provides that- “state shall Endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India”. This was the basic introduction of the UCC. Now the thing comes that although UCC is mentioned and provided in the constitution of India but whether it will be implemented or not. These major questions have no answers, which is becoming a major obstacle in its implementation. The uniform civil code has always empowers Indian women and their social status in the society. It includes that does the existence of uniform civil code is necessary for us. The various contradictions that are not allowing UCC to be implemented are summed up here. This research paper also contains that what are the major challenges, besides from political subject, does India face in implementing a uniform civil code for all religion or we can say that common personal laws for every religion. Keywords— Uniform civil code, Article 44 1. INTRODUCTION Article 44(which comes under the directive principle of state policy) of the Indian constitution provides that- “the state shall Endeavour to secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India”. But at present over 60 years have been passed but this view has not been yet implemented.
    [Show full text]
  • Current Contents
    CURRENT CONTENTS A Current Awareness Bulletin “Containing Broad Subject Headings of Current Articles Published in Journals Received Recently” National Human Rights Commission Documentation Centre (E-Library) December, 2018 ABOUT THE PUBLICATION National Human Rights Commission Library is subscribing approximately 60 Indian and Foreign Journals. Foreign Journals, because of higher subscription price, are procured only in single copy. These Journals contain Scholarly Articles which may be useful to the Hon’ble Chairperson, Members, Senior Officers & Staff members of the Commission, Interns, Research Scholars and readers/users in the Library. In order to make them aware of the recent articles published in Journals subscribed in the Library, this Publication namely “Current Contents” on Quarterly basis is brought out by the Library. This Publication arranges the latest articles published in Journals broad Subject – Headings alongwith necessary details such as Author, Title, Citation and full name of the Journal. This Publication is compiled for circulation among the Hon’ble Chairperson, Members, Senior Officers for their awareness. Photocopies of any article, which will be required by them will be provided by the Library. We hope that this Publication will be useful. Om Prakash Librarian/Documentation Officer Subject Index S. No Subject Heading Page Nos. 1 AADHAAR 1 2. ANTI-DEFECTION 1 3. ARRESTS 1 4. CASTE 1 5. CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE 1 6. CHILDREN 2 7. CLIMATE 2 8. CONSTITUTION 2 9. CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM 3 10 CYBER LAW 3 11. DALIT 3 12. DEATH PENALTY 3, 4 13. DEMOCRACY 4, 5 14. DEMONETIZATION 5 15. DISABILITY 5 16. EDUCATION 5 17. ELDER PEOPLE 6 18.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Civil Code Vis a Vis Gender Justice in India
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR INNOVATIVE RESEARCH IN MULTIDISCIPLINARY FIELD ISSN – 2455-0620 Volume - 3, Issue - 8, Aug - 2017 Uniform Civil Code vis a vis Gender Justice in India Mrs. Prabhavati K.S. Baskey Assistant Professor of Law, Gujarat National Law University, Gujarat, India. Email – [email protected] Abstract: In India there had never been an Indian personal Law. Instead there are several personal laws, applicable to various religious communities i.e the Hindus, Muslims, Christians, Jews and Parsees. Each of this is known as the personal law of the particular community and covers matters of personal relationship like marriage, adoption, inheritance and succession, maintenance and guardianship. Two major personal laws in India are the Hindu and the Muslim. Like most personal laws they are linked with religion and customary practices. The Constitution enjoins upon the state to ‘secure for the citizens a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India’. When the constitution was made many members were obsessed with the idea of national integration, therefore the debate on Uniform Civil Code has ever since not stopped. Key Words: Uniform Civil Code, Personal Law, Constitution, Religion, Marriage, Divorce (talaq) 1. INTRODUCTION: Personal law in India are really personal. They are subject to interpretation and application in their own unique way to suit personal conditions. In several cases the Honourable Supreme Court has tried to intervene and give more liberal approach to the text of the law but they have not been very successful. India unlike other popular legal systems does not have a uniform personal law. People belonging to different religious groups follow different religion.
    [Show full text]
  • Uniform Civil Code: Should Be Or Should Not Be Busra Noor1
    UNIFORM CIVIL CODE: SHOULD BE OR SHOULD NOT BE BUSRA NOOR1 It won’t be incorrect to call India a secular republic de jure rather than calling her a secular republic de facto. Though we declared our nation secular long back in 1976 by the 42nd Constitutional (Amendment) Act, we failed to adopt the concept both legally as well as practically. The Indian Constitution is stuck in a more or less compromise situation at present where the judiciary can be seen endeavouringto strike a balance between the Fundamental Right and the Directive Principle of State Policy. The significance of Uniform Civil Code could be inferred from the fact that the framers of the constitution devoted a full article to it. The Indian constitution includes the setting up of a Uniform Civil Code for its citizen under Article 44 in Part IV-The Directive Principle of State Policy. Article 44 states: “The State shall endeavor to secure for the citizens, a uniform civil code throughout the territory of India.” The issue of Uniform Civil Code has been in the limelight since 1995 when Supreme Court in the landmark judgment of SARLA MUDGAL v. UNION OF INDIA‎AIR 1995 SC 1531, stressed on the need for the Uniform Civil Code in matters of marriage, inheritance, succession, etc. In the opinion of the court the Fundamental Rights relating to religion of members of any community would not be affected thereby. The Hon’ble Supreme Courtoserved that permissibility of bigamy under Muslim Personal Law is inconsistent with the laws governing other communities in India and opposed to public morals and therefore should be supplemented by a Uniform Civil Code.
    [Show full text]
  • From Religious Personal Laws to a Uniform Civil Code
    Charting a New Path Toward Gender Equality in India: From Religious Personal Laws to a Uniform Civil Code * SHALINA A. CHIBBER INTRODUCTION In India, only Muslim men may practice polygamy,1 and Hindu sons inherit greater shares of their parents’ estates than their sisters do.2 While one’s religion determines which law will apply to him or her regarding marriage, divorce, maintenance, guardianship, adoption, inheritance, and succession,3 a common thread woven through all of India’s religious personal law systems is the patriarchal dominance of men and the unequal treatment of women. Given the seemingly strong protections of gender equality in India’s Constitution, however, it is puzzling that the Indian government can uphold facially discriminatory laws against women, especially when such laws affect women’s lives so intimately. In the name of protecting the rights of religious communities, Parliament has thus far skirted its responsibilities to some of the most vulnerable individuals within those communities—the women. The religious personal law systems of India have not helped Indian women, nor have they been effective in protecting the rights of the religious communities in which Indian women live. Rather, the preservation of these separate laws has served to deepen the division between the majority Hindu population and minority religions, particularly Islam. The personal laws have also perpetuated—and arguably enhanced— tensions between these two groups by reinforcing identities that oppose one another. India must take care to move away from religious personal laws and toward a uniform civil code, as envisioned by Article 44 of the Indian Constitution.4 At present, the debate over a uniform civil code appears hopelessly divided along both political and religious lines.
    [Show full text]
  • Feminist Politics in India: Women and Civil Society Activism
    WORKING PAPER 161 FEMINIST POLITICS IN INDIA: WOMEN AND CIVIL SOCIETY ACTIVISM V Vijayalakshmi INSTITUTE FOR SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CHANGE 2005 FEMINIST POLITICS IN INDIA: WOMEN AND CIVIL SOCIETY ACTIVISM V. Vijayalakshmi* 1 Abstract The paper examines feminist politics in India and the various issues with which they have been engaged. The two issues that divide women and inhibit alliances among the women’s movements are the Uniform Civil Code, and the reservation of seats for women in Parliament and state legislatures. The problem is not only differences in perspectives. It is rather the shift in the centrality of feminist politics from women’s issues alone, to identity politics of caste and religion. Women’s interests and gender justice are undermined by the identity politics of caste and religion. Introduction Within the contemporary feminist discourse in India, identity politics and the assertion of communal identities in particular (both caste and religious) have become core issues. Central to these debates is the articulation of differences among women, group-specific personal laws (i.e. each religious group has its own personal law), affirmative action, and supporting minority community identities.2 There is a view that it would not be easy to disassociate gender interests from caste and religious politics. Such a view is embedded in the political debates on secularism, Hindu nationalism, and the assertion of communal identity. This, in many ways also influences the diverse perspectives within feminist politics. The two issues that divide women and inhibit alliances among the women’s movements are the Uniform Civil Code, and the reservation of seats for women in Parliament and state legislatures.
    [Show full text]