DOCSLIB.ORG

Judson Dance Theater: the Work Is Never Done ABOUT the EXHIBITION MOVING-IMAGE INSTALLATION DESIGNED by CHARLES ATLAS

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Judson Dance Theater: the Work Is Never Done ABOUT the EXHIBITION MOVING-IMAGE INSTALLATION DESIGNED by CHARLES ATLAS Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done ABOUT THE EXHIBITION MOVING-IMAGE INSTALLATION DESIGNED BY CHARLES ATLAS ******************************** ******************************** The exhibition is organized by Ana Janevski, Curator, and Thomas J. Lax, Associate For a brief period in the early For this exhibition, filmmaker and Curator, with Martha Joseph, 1960s, a group of choreographers, video artist Charles Atlas has Curatorial Assistant, Department of Media and Performance Art. visual artists, composers, and made an installation of historical Performances are produced filmmakers gathered in Judson moving-image material related to by Lizzie Gorfaine, Producer, Memorial Church, a socially engaged the work of the choreographers with Kate Scherer, Manager, Performance and Live Programs. Protestant congregation in New featured in the performance York’s Greenwich Village, for a program, alternating with a series of workshops that ultimately compilation of performance footage redefined what counted as dance. from the Judson group’s various The performances that evolved members. It includes footage of The exhibition is made possible by Hyundai Card. from these workshops incorporated both individual and group pieces everyday movements—gestures drawn made during the Judson era and Leadership support is provided from the street or the home; their after, emphasizing the relationship by Monique M. Schoen Warshaw, The Jill and Peter Kraus Endowed structures were based on games, of the soloist to the ensemble and Fund for Contemporary simple tasks, and social dances. showing how Judson influenced the Exhibitions, and by MoMA’s Wallis Spontaneity and unconventional later careers of these artists. To Annenberg Fund for Innovation in Contemporary Art through the methods of composition were create the segment dedicated to Annenberg Foundation. emphasized. The Judson artists Trisha Brown, Atlas collaborated Major support is provided by investigated the very fundamentals with Trisha Brown Dance Company’s Jody and John Arnhold and by of choreography, stripping dance of former archivist Cori Olinghouse. The Contemporary Arts Council its theatrical conventions, and the of The Museum of Modern Art. result, according to VILLAGE VOICE For decades, Atlas (American, Generous funding is provided critic Jill Johnston, was the most b. 1949) has brought together by The Harkness Foundation exciting new dance in a generation. dance and media in ways that have for Dance. Through live performance, film, transformed how performance Additional support is provided by photography, sculptural objects, is documented. Atlas moved to New the Annual Exhibition Fund with major contributions from the musical scores, poetry, and York in 1969 and soon started Estate of Ralph L. Riehle, Alice and archival materials, JUDSON DANCE working with the Merce Cunningham Tom Tisch, Mimi and Peter Haas THEATER: THE WORK IS NEVER DONE Dance Company as stage manager, Fund, Brett and Daniel Sundheim, Karen and Gary Winnick, The traces the history of Judson Dance lighting designer, and in-house Marella and Giovanni Agnelli Fund Theater both in and outside the filmmaker. He left the Cunningham for Exhibitions, and Oya and church, from the workshops that company in 1984 but continued to Bülent Eczacıbaşı. took place there to other spaces collaborate with Cunningham while MoMA Audio is supported by around downtown New York. making his own films and working Bloomberg Philanthropies. with other artists, dancers, The program in the Donald B. musicians, and poets. Atlas has and Catherine C. Marron Atrium introduced new possibilities for is organized into multiple-week representing dance on screen, segments, each of which focuses collapsing moments in time and on the work of one artist: Yvonne following performers with his Rainer, Deborah Hay, David Gordon, camera to better capture their Lucinda Childs, Steve Paxton, and movement through space. He also Trisha Brown. Additionally, a video contributed to PAST FORWARD, a installation of related material, major Judson reunion in 2000 edited by the artist Charles Atlas, organized by ballet dancer will be on view. In the final Mikhail Baryshnikov’s White Oak weeks of the exhibition, Movement Dance Project. Research, an organization with a direct lineage to Judson, will hold classes and workshops. YVONNE RAINER Since the beginning of her career SEP 16–23 in the early 1960s, Yvonne Rainer (American, b. 1934) has challenged ****************** many of the movement conventions and narrative structures of modern dance. PERFORMANCE PROGRAM The performance program features eight dances by Rainer, including SEP 16, 17, her earliest works, THREE SATIE 19, 20, 22 SPOONS (1961) and THREE SEASCAPES (1962), in which she explores various PROGRAM REPEATS AT relationships between movement and 12:30 AND 3:00 P.M. sound. The program also includes two sections from TERRAIN (1963)—the THREE SATIE SPOONS Judson Dance Theater’s first evening- (1961) length presentation of a single work by one choreographer—“Talking Solo” THREE SEASCAPES and “Diagonal,” the latter of which (1962) uses games as a guiding compositional principle. TRIO A (1966), which has WE SHALL RUN (1963) undergone many incarnations, is a series of precisely constructed TALKING SOLO (1963) sequences of seemingly disconnected motions, both virtuosic and mundane, DIAGONAL (1963) in which the performer never makes eye contact with the audience. Rainer CHAIR-PILLOW (1969) also experimented with athletic and everyday movements in WE SHALL RUN TRIO A: RETROGRADE, (1963), set to the Tuba mirum from FACING, IN THE Hector Berlioz’s 1837 Requiem, and MIDNIGHT HOUR CHAIR-PILLOW (1969), which was first (1969–2011) performed in her CONTINUOUS PROJECT— ALTERED DAILY (1969). This latter TRIO A WITH FLAGS project included many Judson dancers (1970) and explored different aspects of the working process of dance making, ****************** learning, and rehearsing. It was also an important source for The MOVING-IMAGE PROGRAM Grand Union, an improvisational group Rainer was key to forming in the TRIO A (1966), 1970s, which gathered some of the performed in 1978 same Judson participants together again. TRIO A (1966), Short films: HAND MOVIE (1966), and RHODE ISLAND RED (1968), performed in 1969 Rehearsal of CONTINUOUS PROJECT— ALTERED DAILY (1969) Peter Moore’s photograph of Robert Rauschenberg, Joseph Schlichter (back), Sally Gross, Tony Holder, Deborah Hay, and Robert Morris (middle), Yvonne Rainer, Alex Hay, TRIO A WITH FLAGS and Lucinda Childs (front) in We Shall Run, 1963 (detail). Performed in Two Evenings (1970) 2 of Dances by Yvonne Rainer, Wadsworth Atheneum, Hartford, Connecticut, March 7, 1965 DEBORAH HAY Deborah Hay (American, b. 1941) SEP 24–OCT 7 was active in the Judson Dance Theater group as both a dancer and ****************** choreographer. Like many of her peers, she explored the increasingly blurred PERFORMANCE PROGRAM line between choreography and everyday movement, organizing her pieces around OCT 4, 5, 6 tasks, games, repetition, and the AT 2:00 P.M. reduction of movement. In particular, she explored group configurations in TEN (1968) a selection of works shown at the Anderson Theater in 1968, including ****************** GROUP I (1968), GROUP II (1969), and TEN (1968). Jill Johnston, reviewing MOVING-IMAGE PROGRAM that concert in the VILLAGE VOICE, remarked that the three dances Deborah Hay’s “leave me searching for superlatives. Dance Classes I’m tempted with platitudes like (c. 1966) ‘breakthrough’ and ‘come a long way.’” The movements in all three dances Deborah Hay and consist almost entirely of casual Steve Paxton steps ordered into strict geometric Dancing in the configurations, and use the same basic Spring St. Loft materials: musicians, movers, and (c. 1968) poles. TEN requires ten performers to divide into groups of different GROUP I (1968) sizes and play a version of follow the leader around a vertical and a TEN (1968), horizontal pole. In the original 1968 performed in 1982 performance, the rock band The Third Eye provided live accompaniment. GROUP II (1969) However, when the piece was performed in 1982 at Danspace Project, ten TRIO I (1969) contemporary New York–based dancers and TEN (1968), and the band Max Fraction were performed in 1969 invited. Hay’s work illustrates her belief in the potential playfulness of dance and the responsiveness of the dancing body to its surroundings. From top: Deborah Hay. Still from Group I, 1968. Filmed by Robert Rauschenberg; 4 Deborah Hay. Still from Group II, 1969. Filmed by Hollis Frampton DAVID GORDON During his work as part of Judson OCT 8–21 Dance Theater, David Gordon (American, b. 1936) was interested ****************** in how choreography brings disparate elements together on stage, and how PERFORMANCE PROGRAM these elements are perceived by audiences. Gordon performed his solo OCT 18, 19, 20 MANNEQUIN DANCE (1962) at Judson AT 3:00 P.M. Dance Theater’s inaugural concert in 1962. The following year, his growing THE MATTER @ MoMA fascination with show business and (1971/2018) pop culture was visible in RANDOM BREAKFAST (1963), performed with his ****************** partner, dancer Valda Setterfield. In 1971 Gordon choreographed a group MOVING-IMAGE PROGRAM piece, THE MATTER (1971), during a Grand Union residency at Oberlin THE MATTER, College, and it was performed a year rehearsal excerpts later at the Cunningham Studio. from 1979 Throughout that performance, forty dancers—both trained and untrained— CHAIR (1974) suddenly froze, or took positions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moma PRESENTS the FIRST MAJOR MUSEUM EXHIBITION to FOCUS on the JUDSON DANCE THEATER’S CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INFLUENCE
    MoMA PRESENTS THE FIRST MAJOR MUSEUM EXHIBITION TO FOCUS ON THE JUDSON DANCE THEATER’S CROSS-DISCIPLINARY INFLUENCE Presentation Includes a Robust Performance Program, alongside Photography, Film, Scores, Archival Materials, and Oral Histories Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done September 16, 2018–February 3, 2019 Second-floor Collection Galleries and The Donald B. and Catherine C. Marron Atrium #JudsonDance NEW YORK, September 12, 2018—The Museum of Modern Art presents Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done, a major exhibition that looks anew at the formative moment in the 1960s when a group of choreographers, visual artists, composers, and filmmakers made use of a local church to present groundbreaking cross-disciplinary performances. Featuring celebrated dance works by Judson artists, The Work Is Never Done includes a gallery exhibition, a print publication, and an ambitious performance program in the Museum’s Donald B. and Catherine C. Marron Atrium. On view from September 16, 2018, through February 3, 2019, the exhibition highlights the group’s ethos of collaboration and the range of its participants through live performance and some 300 objects including films, photographic documentation, sculptural objects, scores, music, and archival material. Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done is organized by Ana Janevski, Curator, and Thomas J. Lax, Associate Curator, with Martha Joseph, Curatorial Assistant, Department of Media and Performance Art. Taking its name from the Judson Memorial Church, a socially engaged Protestant congregation in New York’s Greenwich Village, Judson Dance Theater was organized in 1962 as a series of open workshops from which its participants developed performances.
    [Show full text]
  • Modernism 1 Modernism
    Modernism 1 Modernism Modernism, in its broadest definition, is modern thought, character, or practice. More specifically, the term describes the modernist movement, its set of cultural tendencies and array of associated cultural movements, originally arising from wide-scale and far-reaching changes to Western society in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. Modernism was a revolt against the conservative values of realism.[2] [3] [4] Arguably the most paradigmatic motive of modernism is the rejection of tradition and its reprise, incorporation, rewriting, recapitulation, revision and parody in new forms.[5] [6] [7] Modernism rejected the lingering certainty of Enlightenment thinking and also rejected the existence of a compassionate, all-powerful Creator God.[8] [9] In general, the term modernism encompasses the activities and output of those who felt the "traditional" forms of art, architecture, literature, religious faith, social organization and daily life were becoming outdated in the new economic, social, and political conditions of an Hans Hofmann, "The Gate", 1959–1960, emerging fully industrialized world. The poet Ezra Pound's 1934 collection: Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum. injunction to "Make it new!" was paradigmatic of the movement's Hofmann was renowned not only as an artist but approach towards the obsolete. Another paradigmatic exhortation was also as a teacher of art, and a modernist theorist articulated by philosopher and composer Theodor Adorno, who, in the both in his native Germany and later in the U.S. During the 1930s in New York and California he 1940s, challenged conventional surface coherence and appearance of introduced modernism and modernist theories to [10] harmony typical of the rationality of Enlightenment thinking.
    [Show full text]
  • Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater
    Performance and Interaction: Judson Dance Theater In 1980, Arlene Croce, a respected dance critic, said in a column in the New Yorker that Robert Wilson had been the main influence, after Merce Cunningham, on the choreography of the day. Yvonne Rainer responded angrily to what she saw as lack of perspective and knowledge of modern dance in a letter published in the performance magazine Live. The letter included a genealogy chart of contemporary dance and how it related to the visual arts world, which is shown here. Simone Forti was at the Judson Dance Theater with Brown and Rainer and also made an argument for dance as sculpture with her first minimalist works. Their objec- tives included the idea of actually involving the spectator’s gaze, rejecting the concept of audience as voyeur. Bibliography Krauss, Rosalind E. Passages in Modern Sculpture. Cambridge (Mass.): MIT, 1977. Lambert, Carrie. “More or Less Minimalism: Six Notes on Performance and Visual Art in the 60s” en: Goldstein, Ann. The close, simultaneous connections between dance and the visual arts in the 1960s A Minimal Future? Art as Object and 70s can be seen both in the works of Yvonne Rainer (1934), Trisha Brown (1936) 1958-1968. Los Angeles: Museum and Simone Forti (1935), which are exhibited in the room, and in the theoretical analyses of Contemporary Art; Cambridge: presented by Barbara Rose and Rosalind Krauss about the theatrical tone of sculpture MIT Press, cop., 2004. and minimal painting. Trio A, Rainer’s choreography created in 1966 as the first part of her tetralogy The Mind Rainer, Yvonne.
    [Show full text]
  • <Ecjtl5"-Uen/)IIS
    QUp;,~,I]),ft/CE~~ Happenings audience , 1960. /<ECJtl5"-Uen/)IIS •' photo : Robert McElroy ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Production Director: Cynthia Hedstrom Production Coordinator: M.J. Becker Production Assistants: Sarah Hyman and Heather Lee Technical Coordinator and Lighting Director: Al Be Vier Stage Manager: Randy Barbee Master Electrician: Kay Berry Sound Technician: David Solin Box Office Manager: Elizabeth Rectanus Program Design & Production: Nancy Stark Smith, Cynthia Hedstrom, Gail Copen Special thanks to the Poetry Project of St. Mark's Church, Chase Manhattan Bank, Mabou Mines, and the Contact Quarterly. This performance is being videotaped by the Jerome Robbins Archive of the Dance Collection of The New York Public Library with the cooperation of The Danspace Project and the Bennington College Judson Project. We gratefully acknowledge the assistance of the National Endowment for the Arts and the New York State Council on the Arts. All contributions to this and other activities of The Danspace Project and the Bennington College Judson Project are tax deductible and are gratefully appreciated. The Danspace Project & The Bennington College Judson Project Present PROGRAM A Thursday, Friday, April 15 & 16, 1982 Works By: EDWARD BHARTONN REMY CHARLIP -PHILIP CORNER BRIAN DEPALMA JUDITH DUNN and BILL DIXON SIMONE FORTI YVONNE RAINER ELAINE SUMMERS PROGRAMB Saturday , Sunday, April 17 & 18, 1982 Works By: LUCINDA CHILDS DEBORAH HAY AILEEN PASSLOFF STEVE PAXTON CAROLEESCHNEEMANN ELAINE SUMMERS JAMES WARING THESE PERFORMANCES ARE A BENEFIT FOR THE DANSPACE PROJECT AND THE BENNINGTON COLLEGE JUDSON PROJECT THESE PERFORMANCES WERE MADE POSSIBLE WITH THE SUPPORT OF THE CAPEZIO FOUNDATION AND THE NEW YORK COMMUNITY TRUST. DANSPACE ALSO RECEIVES SUPPORT FROM THE NATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR THE ARTS, THE NEW YORK STATE COUNCIL ON THE ARTS, MOBIL FOUNDATION, AND CONSOLIDATED EDISON.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is a Dance? in 3 Dances, Gene Friedman Attempts to Answer Just That, by Presenting Various Forms of Movement. the Film Is D
    GENE FRIEDMAN 3 Dances What is a dance? In 3 Dances, Gene Friedman attempts to answer just that, by presenting various forms of movement. The film is divided into three sections: “Public” opens with a wide aerial shot of The Museum of Modern Art’s Sculpture Garden and visitors walking about; “Party,” filmed in the basement of Judson Memorial Church, features the artists Alex Hay, Deborah Hay, Robert Rauschenberg, and Steve Paxton dancing the twist and other social dances; and “Private” shows the dancer Judith Dunn warming up and rehearsing in her loft studio, accompanied by an atonal vocal score. The three “dances” encompass the range of movement employed by the artists, musicians, and choreographers associated with Judson Dance Theater. With its overlaid exposures, calibrated framing, and pairing of distinct actions, Friedman’s film captures the group’s feverish spirit. WORKSHOPS In the late 1950s and early 1960s, three educational sites were formative for the group of artists who would go on to establish Judson Dance Theater. Through inexpensive workshops and composition classes, these artists explored and developed new approaches to art making that emphasized mutual aid and art’s relationship to its surroundings. The choreographer Anna Halprin used improvisation and simple tasks to encourage her students “to deal with ourselves as people, not dancers.” Her classes took place at her home outside San Francisco, on her Dance Deck, an open-air wood platform surrounded by redwood trees that she prompted her students to use as inspiration. In New York, near Judson Memorial Church, the ballet dancer James Waring taught a class in composition that brought together different elements of a theatrical performance, much like a collage.
    [Show full text]
  • Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo*
    Simone Forti with a lion cub at the Giardino Zoologico di Roma, 1968. Courtesy Simone Forti and The Box, LA. Simone Forti Goes to the Zoo* JULIA BRYAN-WILSON In the photograph, a young woman in a short skirt and sandals sits on a bench. With her crooked elbow, she braces her handbag to her body, tucking her large sketchpad into her armpit. She is petting a lion cub, and as she gazes down to witness the small but extraordinary fact of her hand on its fur, the ani- mal’s face turns towards the camera lens with closed eyes. This is dancer and choreographer Simone Forti on one of her many visits to the zoo during the brief time she lived in Rome in the late 1960s. Far from today’s “wildlife sanctu- aries” where animals can ostensibly wander freely, as the photo of this uncaged cub might suggest, the Giardino Zoologico di Roma offered a highly controlled environment in which animals lived within tight enclosures; Forti was here indulging in a staged, paid encounter, one that she characterized as “irre- sistible.”1 Irresistible because she was consistently moved by the creatures she drew and studied—moved as in stirred, or touched, as well as in shifted, or altered. As I argue, her dance practice changed dramatically as a result of the time she spent in Rome observing animal motions and interacting with other, animate forms of art. Petting a lion cub: irresistible, but still melancholy. Designed in part by German collector and merchant Carl Hagenbeck and built in 1911, the Roman zoo is an example of the turn-of-the-century “Hagenbeck revolution” in zoo architecture, which attempted to provide more naturalistic-appearing, open-air surroundings that were landscaped with artificial rocks and featured moats instead of bars, often creating tableaux of animals from different taxonomic * This article was made possible by the indefatigable Simone Forti, who talked with me, danced for me, and pulled all manner of documents and photographs out of her dresser drawers for me; thank you, Simone.
    [Show full text]
  • A Choreographer's Handbook
    A Choreographer’s Handbook On choreography: ‘Choreography is a negotiation with the patterns your body is thinking’ On rules: ‘Try breaking the rules on a need to break the rules basis’ A Choreographer’s Handbook invites the reader to investigate how and why to make a dance performance. In an inspiring and unusually empowering sequence of stories, ideas and paradoxes, internationally renowned dancer, choreographer and teacher Jonathan Burrows explains how it’s possible to navigate a course through this complex process. It is a stunning reflection on a personal practice and professional journey, and draws upon five years of workshop discussions, led by Burrows. Burrows’ open and honest prose gives the reader access to a range of exercises, meditations, principles and ideas on choreography that allow artists and dance-makers to find their own aesthetic process. It is a book for anyone interested in making performance, at whatever level and in whichever style. Jonathan Burrows has toured and worked internationally as a dancer and choreographer and is currently a resident artist at Kaaitheater Brussels. In 2002 he was commended by the Foundation for Contempor- ary Performance Arts in New York for his contribution to contemporary dance, and in 2004 received a New York Dance and Performance ‘Bessie’ for his work ‘Both Sitting Duet’. He has made commissioned work for many companies, including William Forsythe’s Ballett Frankfurt, Sylvie Guillem and The Royal Ballet. He is a visiting member of faculty at P.A.R.T.S. in Brussels and is a Visiting Professor at Hamburg University and Royal Holloway University of London.
    [Show full text]
  • University of California Irvine
    University of California Irvine A Study on the Confluence of Resilience Skill Building and Contact Improvisation on Collegiate Dancers THESIS Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF FINE ARTS In Dance By Connor B. Senning Thesis Committee: Dr. Kelli Sharp, Chair Dr. Lisa Naugle Assistant Professor Lindsay Gilmour 2020 © 2020 Connor B Senning ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES.........................……………………………………………………………… v LIST OF TABLES........................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………………………....vi i ABSTRACT OF THESIS……………………………………………………………………….... viii INTRODUCTION………………………………………………………………………………....1 • Why Contact Improvisation? • Why Resilience Skill Sets? CHAPTER ONE: CONTACT IMPROVISATION AND THE RELATIONSHIP TO SELF-AWARENESS ...................................................................................................................... 4 • Deepening the Practice of Contact Improvisation • How Self-Awareness is Experience • Why Self-Awareness First? CHAPTER TWO: SELF-REGULATION & MENTAL AGILITY……………………………… 9 • Self-Regulating within Practice • Shifting into Mental Agility CHAPTER THREE: CONNECTION & OPTIMISM…………………………………………..... 13 • Touch and Voice as Connection • Encountering the Future • Entertaining Optimism CHAPTER FOUR: Methods……………………………………………………………………… 17 • Screening • Dance Workshop Structure • Surveys CHAPTER FIVE: Results………………………………………………………………………… 24 CHAPTER
    [Show full text]
  • For Immediate Release CONTACT: Payal Kumar Director of Communications & Marketing
    For Immediate Release CONTACT: Payal Kumar Director of Communications & Marketing 714.541.8314 ext. 119 [email protected] DANCE LEGEND STEVE PAXTON TO TEACH WORKSHOP WITH LOW-INCOME YOUTH AT THE WOODEN FLOOR SANTA ANA, Calif. (February 28, 2012) – Steve Paxton, one of the most important living figures in dance, will teach a two-week workshop entitled Material for the Spine with students of The Wooden Floor, a leading edge arts-based youth development nonprofit in Southern California dedicated to breaking the cycle of poverty in low-income children. Paxton, the father of Contact Improvisation, a form of dance that explores the relationship between the body and momentum, gravity, and friction, has made an influence on choreography globally. Students at The Wooden Floor eagerly await the arrival of Paxton and his workshop, which runs March 12-24. “With Material for the Spine, I am interested in alloying a technical approach to the processes of improvisation,” states Paxton. ”It is a system for exploring interior and exterior muscles of the back. It aims to bring consciousness to the dark side of the body, that is the ‘other’ side, or the inside, those sides not much self-seen, and to submit sensations from them to the mind for consideration.” His arrival at The Wooden Floor underscores the organization’s forward-thinking artistic vision to use dance as a means of positive transformation for the 375 low-income youth it serves annually. “Dance is at the center of everything we do,” affirms Melanie Ríos Glaser, Artistic Director for
    [Show full text]
  • Judson Dance Theater: the Work Is Never Done
    Judson Dance Theater: The Work Is Never Done Yvonne Rainer, Simone Forti, and Steve Paxton reflect on Robert Ellis Dunn and Judith Dunn’s composition class YVONNE RAINER: My name is Yvonne Rainer. SIMONE FORTI: I’m Simone Forti. STEVE PAXTON: My name is Steve Paxton. I’m a dancer. RAINER: Choreographer. FORTI: Artist. RAINER: Writer. Filmmaker. FORTI: I’ve mainly worked with movement. PAXTON: I came from Arizona with my banjo on my knee about 1958. RAINER: I felt I’d come into dance pretty late, so I was in a hurry in 1960. I mean, absorbing everything, and that included ballet. It included Cunningham, it included Waring and Cage. PAXTON: The modern dance world was not homogeneous. I mean, it wasn’t all just one big thing. There were a lot of different aesthetics and dance approaches in it. FORTI: When Bob Dunn offered his composition class, it was like something solid to work with. RAINER: I enrolled in Robert Dunn’s composition class in the fall of 1960. At that point there were only five of us. And Bob rolled out these scores for John Cage’s Fontana Mix and started talking about ways that score might be adapted for choreographic purposes. FORTI: I remember the scores themselves, transferring into movement rather than sound. RAINER: I was looking for some other way to look at things. I mean, painters were defying all the rules already and Cage came along and introduced a whole new vocabulary of sounds and movements. PAXTON: Chance methods meant that instead of trying to imagine a new way to do something, you just set out using dice, coins to decide what part of the body to use or entrances and exits and length durations.
    [Show full text]
  • Barbara Dilley & Yvonne Rainer with Wendy Perron
    Danspace Project Conversations Without Walls: Barbara Dilley & Yvonne Rainer with Wendy Perron November 21, 2020 Judy Hussie-Taylor Welcome to Danspace Project and our Conversation Without Walls. I'm Judy Hussie-Taylor, Executive ​ ​ Director & Chief Curator. I'm honored to welcome three people I hold in high esteem, Barbara Dilley, Yvonne Rainer, and Wendy Perron. Thank you all for joining us today to celebrate Wendy's new book "The Grand Union: Accidental Anarchists of Downtown Dance 1970-76" published by Wesleyan University Press. So this is an exciting occasion. I just quickly want to thank our Danspace staff and our behind the scenes wizards, especially Yolanda Royster and Ben Kimitch, for holding us all together today on the Zoom. So all three of our guests have extensive histories with Danspace Project. Barbara Dilley co-founded Danspace Project, along with Mary Overlie and Larry Fagin in 1974. Prior to that, Barbara was a member of Merce Cunningham's company from 1963 to 1968. She danced with Yvonne Rainer from 1966 to 1970 and was a member of the Grand Union, which you'll hear a lot about today. She was instrumental in the founding of Naropa University in Boulder, Colorado, which is where I met Barbara. She designed the dance department and served as the University's President from 1985 to 1993. Most recently, she is the author of "This Perfect Moment, Teaching Thinking Dancing," which is part autobiography, part workbook. Choreographer, filmmaker, and the author of many books, Yvonne Rainer was a co-founding member of Judson Dance Theater in 1962.
    [Show full text]
  • Download, Or Email Articles for Individual Use
    Dance Chronicle, 37:122–128, 2014 Copyright © 2014 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 0147-2526 print / 1532-4257 online DOI: 10.1080/01472526.2014.876598 A Self-Critical Phenomenology of Criticism JOSHUA M. HALL Living in an Artworld By Noel¨ Carroll. 388 pp. Louisville, Ky.: Chicago Spectrum Press, 2012. $22.50. ISBN 978-158374-220-4. Noel¨ Carroll, a central figure in analytic (Anglo-American) philosophy of art, and spouse of renowned dance scholar Sally Banes (who co-authored several of these essays), offers us something remarkable in his new book—namely, a collection of thirty years of his theoretical essays and dance reviews. Carroll wrote some of the pieces while he was a graduate student at the Univer- sity of Illinois, Chicago, and there have been some dramatic changes since then in both the art world and Carroll’s philosophical views. Thus, he mod- estly characterizes the book as “an archeological artifact” of a “somewhat confessional” variety (p. 267). Inspired by Carroll, I too will adopt an arche- ological stance, with a promise that the reader’s patience will be repaid with something surprising at the end of the dig. To begin with a panoramic view of the site: Living in an Artworld is divided into three sections, on dance, performance/theater, and the fine arts, respectively. I will focus primarily on the dance section (because I am writing for a dance studies readership, and my own background is in dance), but the most helpful point of entry into the book is to be found in Carroll’s present- day introduction to the fine arts section.
    [Show full text]