bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.16.456573; this version posted August 17, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Comprehensive species sampling and sophisticated algorithmic approaches refute the monophyly of Arachnida Jesús A. Ballesteros1, Carlos E. Santibáñez-López1,2, Caitlin M. Baker1,3, Ligia R. Benavides3, Tauana J. Cunha3,4, Guilherme Gainett1, Andrew Z. Ontano1, Emily V.W. Setton1, Claudia P. Arango5, Efrat Gavish-Regev6, Mark S. Harvey7,8, Ward C. Wheeler9, Gustavo Hormiga10, Gonzalo Giribet3, Prashant P. Sharma1* 1Department of Integrative Biology; University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA 53706 2Department of Biology, Western Connecticut State University; Danbury, CT, USA, 06810 3Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University; Cambridge, MA, USA, 02138 4Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Panama 5Office for Research, Griffith University; Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia 6National Natural History Collections, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem; Jerusalem, Israel 9190401 7Collections & Research, Western Australian Museum; Welshpool, Western Australia 6106, Australia 8School of Biological Sciences, University of Western Australia; Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia 9Division of Invertebrate Zoology, American Museum of Natural History; New York, NY, USA, 10024 10Department of Biological Sciences, George Washington University; Washington, DC, USA, 20052 *Correspondence:
[email protected] Author contributions: J.A.B. and P.P.S. designed the project. J.A.B., C.E.S.L., G. Giribet, and P.P.S. designed the taxon sampling strategy. J.A.B., C.E.S.L., C.M.B., L.R.B., T.J.C., G.