STUDY OF WATER JET SYSTEM DESIGN FOR FAST PATROL (FPB-60)

Arica Dwi SUSANTO, U.B. PRIHANTO, AHMADI, Okol S SUHARYO, Adi BANDONO*

*Indonesian Naval Technology College, STTAL, Bumimoro-Morokrembangan, Surabaya 60187, Indonesia

FPB-60 is a type of patrol boat built by in Indonesia to strengthen the needs of water territorial. However, the 20 years age caused a decrease in performance of the vessel. The method used was the harvard guldammer method to calculate water jet system parameters at a maximum velocity of 35 knots such as inlet diameter and nossel diameter, pump power, pump type used and other parameters to obtain Overall Propulsive Coefficient at that speed. In the calculation of water system design, the amount of capacity generated water jet pump system obtained was 4.15 m3 / s with flow velocity on the nozzle/jet of 28.8 m/s. Based on the value of specific swabs of suction (Nss) of 6205.49, the pump for the water jet propulsion system had considered fulfilled the cavitation limit requirement so that it could be used for (FPB-60).

Keywords: Vessel Resistance, Water Jet, Power, FPB.

1. INTRODUCTION compared to that use so that with an increase FPB-60 is a type of patrol boat in thrust generated by the it built by a shipyard in Indonesia to will be able to produce higher strengthen the needs of water vessel speed (Herdzik 2013). territorial. However, the 20 years This paper have many age cause a decrease in supporting its research, for example performance of the vessel. Based on paper with title An Approximate these demands, it is necessary to Method For Calculation of Mean have a that has good, safe Statistical Value of Ship Service acceleration and maneuverability, Speed on a Given Shipping Line, and has a low boat load so that it Useful in Preliminary Design Stage can be operated in deep or shallow (Żelazny 2015), Experimental waters (Susanto.et.al. 2017). Investigation on Stern-Boat With the use of a water jet Deployment System and propulsion system, the vessel can Operability For Korean Coast be cultivated to have a smaller load Guard Ship (Chun.et.al. 2013),

Page 135 Performance of VLCC Ship with Free Surface Flow over a Container Podded Propulsion System and Vessel Using CFD Rudder (Amin 2014). Introduction (Atreyapurapu.et.al 2014). to (Tupper Empirical Prediction of Resistance 1975). Basic Ship Theory (Tupper of Fishing Vessels (Kleppesto 2001). Practical Ship Design 2015). Designing Constraints in (Watson 1998). Ship Resistance and Evaluation of Ship Propulsion Propulsion : Practical Estimation of Power (Charchalis 2013). Ship Propulsive Power (Anthony F. Coefficients of -hull Molland 2011). Practical Ship Interaction in Propulsion System of Hydrodynamics (Bertram 2000). Inland Waterway Vessels with Effect of Fluid Density on Ship Stern Tunnels (Tabaczek 2014). Hull Resistance and Powering Cost optimization of marine fuels (Samson 2015). Ship Design and consumption as important factor of Construction (D'arcalengelo 1969). control ship’s sulfur and nitrogen Resistance Propulsion and Steering oxides emissions (Kowalski 2013). of Ship (WPA Van Lamerren Numerical Investigation of the 1984). Predictive Analysis of Bare- Influence of Water Depth on Ship Hull Resistance of a 25,000 Dwt Resistance (Premchand 2015). The Tanker Vessel (Adumene 2015). Wageningen Propeller Series Resistance and Propulsion of Ships (Kuiper 1992). Principles of Naval (Harvald 1992). Hydrodynamic of Architecture Second Revision Ship Propellers (Andersen 1994). (Lewis 1988). Marine Propulsion Ship Design for Efficiency and (Sladky 1976). Economy (Bertram 1998). Design In this paper, we used Harvard of Propulsion Systems for High- guldammer method to calculate Speed Craft (Bartee 1975). A water jet system parameters at method of Calculation of Ship maximum velocity of 35 knots such Resistance on Calm Water Useful at as inlet diameter and nossel Preliminary Stages of Ship Design diameter, pump power, pump type (Zelazny 2014). Increase of Ship used and other parameters to obtain Fuel Consumption Due to the the Overall Propulsive Coefficient Added Resistance in Waves at that speed (Kim 1966). With this (Degiuli.et.al. 2017). An paper, it was expected that the Investigation Into The Resistance water jet propulsion system could Components of Converting a be used as an alternative for patrol Traditional Monohull Fishing to be built and operated in Vessel Into Catamaran Form accordance with their duties. (Samuel 2015). Simulation of a

Page 136 This Paper is organized as 2.2. Water Jet Propulsion on follows. Section 2 is the review Fast Patrol Boat about basic ship theory. Section 3 The ship with water jet were description of results and propulsion is a ship which used research discussion. Finally, the water jet system as the propeller in conclusion of this paper is its operation in the water media so presented in section 4. that the ship can move in accordance with the speed of the 2. RESEARCH desired ship. Ships that use water METHODOLOGY jet propulsion system is a system consisting of bare hull system and 2.1. Propulsion System of The water jet system (Etter 1975). Ship The water jet propulsion system The ship propulsion system, is is widely used primarily for high- the exact matching between prime speed vessels, because based on mover (, , studies that have been conducted, it ) and propeller from was showed that the water jet ship. Matching completion is not propulsion system has a feature that only seen from the engine or has nothing to do with its propeller point of view, but both are propulsive efficiency. Some of the an integrated problem (Etter 1975). features that the water jet propulsion system possesses are Nomenclature described below: After Perpendicular (AP) 1. The absence of propellers Fore Perpendicular (FP) and steering outside the Length between perpendicular (Lpp) vessel is very advantageous Length on the water line (Lwl) Length Overall (Loa) because it reduces the total Breadth molded (B/Bmld) resistance occurring on the Draft/draught (T) vessel and allows the Dept (H) operation of vessels for Freeboard (F) shallow waters. Centre line (CL) Speed of The Ship (Vs) 2. Have good acceleration Ship Resistance (R) ability. Effective Horse Power (EHP) 3. Have good ship motion Thrust Horse Power (THP) when the vessel speed is Delivery Horse Power (DHP) relatively low. Shaft Horse Power (SHP) Brake Horse Power (BHP) 4. Have the advantage when the ship is in movement at a relatively high speed.

Page 137 5. Placement of impeller inside b. Calculation of required ship body will be able to power and total resistance reduce vibration and noise used Harvarld Guldhamer level on ship. method. 6. At a relatively high velocity c. The planning of the water of the vessel, propulsive jet propulsion system started efficiency can be maintained by taking the Overall high enough to be Propulsive Coefficient comparable to the propeller (OPCo) as a first step to propulsion system. calculate the parameters of the water jet propulsion system until the OPC was obtained in accordance with the predefined OPCo. Thereafter, calculations of the cavitation requirements of the channel system and Fig. 1 Water jet System the propulsion pump were Configuration used.

2.3. Cavitation Requirements 3. RESULT AND The evaporation of these liquids DISCUSSION can occur inside the pump or channel due to high flow velocity 3.1 Vessel Data (turbulent flow) which can cause The data from Fast Patrol Boats the pumped fluid temperature to be (FPB-60) to be used as calculations higher. At the pump, the cavitation in the planning of water jet problem often occurs on the suction propulsion system were as follows: side when the pump suction a. LOA :60 m pressure is too low or under it b. LWL saturation pressure (Barrass 2004). : 55 m c. Breadth (B) 2.4. Method of Research. : 8,10 m The planning of the water jet d. Draft (T) propulsion system is based on the : 2,46 m following matters e. Height (H2) a. The ship data used was : 4,86 m Fast Patrol Boats (FPB-60) f. Block Coefficient to be built (Cb) : 0,350

Page 138 g. Velocity (Vs) OPC price of 0.57, the amount of : 35 knot BHP could be calculated as follows:  T  Vs BHP = h  × 3.2. Resistance Calculation  z  OPC 99,17 The magnitude of the = ,49 765× resistance on the ship at the planned ,0 57 vessel velocity of 35 knots or =1570,65 KW 17.99m / s was: In this water jet system,it was a. Frictional Resistance planned that the pump impeller : 82, 463 KN would be driven by a motor with b. Residual Resistance direct clutch transmission, with : 1,16 KN transmission efficiency between c. Resistance 0.96 - 0.99 per pump. In this :3,686 KN planning, the value was 0.96 so the d. Additional amount of SHP could be calculated Resistance :12,22 KN as follows: So the total resistance that occurs SHP =ηT x BHP on the ship was 99.53 KN. =0,96 x 1570,65 =1507,82 KW 3.3. EHP, BHP and SHP Calculation 3.4. Discussion Based on the total resistance, the amount of effective thrust required 3.4.1. Dimension and Water Jet to be able to move the ship in System Parameter Calculation accordance with the planned speed As shown in the figure below, could be calculated as follows: based on the amount of thrust per EHP =RT x Vs SHP in the unit (lbf / HP), the =99,53 x 17,99 amount of power density (SHP / =1790,55 KW Di2) in units (HP / cm2) could be This plan was assumed to be in known. an ideal state so that the amount of thrust required was equal to the amount of total resistance that occurred. The water jet propulsion system was planned to use two pumps of propulsion so that the amount of thrust per pump was 49,765 KN. By taking the initial

Page 139 Vj =   .4 T   ,0 5  ViVi 2 ++×     ρ     .An   =

  4 × 49765   ,0 5  +×  09,1709,17 2 +       × 144,063,1024  

= 28.8 m Fig. 2 Chart of Water jet System s Inlet Dimension The amount of flow capacity in the jet / nozzle: The amount of thrust per SHP QJ = Vj x An was 5.48 so based on the picture = 28,8 x 0,145 3 above, the amount of power density = 4,15 m /s at 0.475 was obtained. The comparison of ship speed and From power density, the main flow velocity through the jet could dimensions of water jet system be expressed by: could be calculated as follows: µ = Vj Vs • Inlet Diameter : = 8,28 0,6682 m 99,17 • Inlet Area : = 0,625 0,350 m2 The amount of ideal jet • Nozzel diameter : efficiency ()ηj : 0,430 m ideal .2 µ • Nozzel Area : ηj = + µ 0,145 m2 1 × By taking the fraction of the = ,02 625 current flow value of 0.05, we + ,01 625 could get the inlet speed as follows: = 0,769 Vi = (1 – w) x Vs For the planning of the water jet = (1 – 0,05) x propulsion system, it was 17,99 recommended that the value of inlet = 17, 09 m/s loss coefficient (ψ) was set between So the amount of speed on the 16% - 20%. In this calculation, the outlet or nozzle (Vj) could be value of inlet loss was 18%, obtained by: because the water jet system used a

Page 140 flush inlet type and the vessel Based on the calculation of operated in a relatively clean area Overall Propulsive Coefficient of water. (OPC), an equal value to the Meanwhile, the value of loss previous forecast was obtained so coefficient (ζ) was recommended that the calculation could be between 1% - 4%. In the continued. calculations for actual jet efficiency, a value of 2% was 3.4.2 Calculation of Pump chosen because the losses on the Characteristic: nozzle were relatively smaller a. Pump Rotation compared to their inlet channels. N = K x SHP(1/3)

So, the actual ()ηjaktual jet efficiency = 69 x (1/3) cost for the water jet system could 2020,45 be obtained by: = 873,66 ≈ ηjaktual = 874 Rpm b. Specific Rotation 1 ()1..2 − µµ The flow capacity × 1− w 2 ..2 hjg (Qj) obtained from the previous ()().11 µζψ +−−+ Vj 2 calculation was 4.15 (m3 / s) = = 146.44 (ft3 / s) converted into gallon units per minute (GPM) 1 ()−×× 769,01769,02 × to be obtained at 65731.06 − ×× 881,08,92 ,01 05 2 +×−−+ GPM. The amount of price for ()() 769,018,0102,01 2 8,28 pump Head could be calculated as follows: = 0,675 H = In the calculation of the overall V 2 V 2 j i +− h propulsion efficiency (OPC), it was g 22 g LT assumed that the pump efficiency = was 0.89 and the relative rotative 8,28 2 09,17 2 − + 5 828, efficiency was 0.98. So, the overall ()× 8,92 ()× 8,92 propulsion efficiency (OPC) could = 33,25 m = be obtained by: 109,06 ft η OPC = jaktual x ηP x So the value of pump specific ηr x ηT rotation could be calculated as = 0,675 x 0,89 follows: x 0,98 x 0,96 Q j Ns = N × = 0,573 ≈ H ,0 75 0,57

Page 141 = 12000 line as the cavitation 874× 65731 06, boundary. 06,109 ,0 75 This means that the pump for = 6639,69 the planned water jet system met Based on the specific rotation the allowable cavitation value of the pumps obtained above, requirements so it was safe to use the type of pump to be used that continuously. corresponds to the specific value of the round was the type of mixed flow pump with a specific rotation between 4000

Page 142 the resulting thrust would also be Hull Resistance of a 25,000 greater. In the planning of water jet Dwt Tanker Vessel', propulsion system is obtained the International Journal of amount of capacity generated water Engineering and Technology, jet pump system is 4.15 m3 / s with pp. 194-198. flow velocity on the nozzle / jet of [2] Amin, JKAA 2014, 28.8 m / s. From the value of 'Performance of VLCC Ship specific swabs of suction (Nss) with Podded Propulsion System obtained that is equal to 6205.49 and Rudder', International then the pump for the water jet Society of Ocean, Mechanical propulsion system has fulfilled the and Aerospace Scientists and cavitation limit requirements so that Engineers, pp. 1-7. it can be used continuously [3] Andersen, JP 1994, (continuous). Hydrodynamic of Ship In this water jet propulsion Propeller, Elsevier, Cambridge. system plan, the amount of capacity [4] Anthony F. Molland, SR 2011, generated by water jet pump system Ship Resistance and Propulsion, was obtained at 4.15 m3/s with Practical Estimation of Ship flow velocity on the nozzle / jet of Propulsive Power, United 28.8 m/s. Based on the value of Stated of America. specific rotation of suction (Nss) [5] Atreyapurapu.et.al, K 2014, obtained at 6205.49, it could be 'Simulation of a Free Surface concluded that the pump for the Flow over a Container Vessel water jet propulsion system had Using CFD', International fulfilled the cavitation limit Journal of Engineering Trends requirements so that it could be and Technology, pp. 334-339. used continuously. [6] Barrass, C 2004, 'Ship Design and Performance for masters and Mates', Elsevier. 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT [7] Bartee, DL 1975, 'Design of Propulsion Systems for Hidh- This research has been Speed Craft', The Society of supported by Indonesia Naval Naval Architects and Marine Technology College (STTAL). Engineers, pp. 1-17. [8] Bertram, HSAV 1998, Ship REFERENCES Design for Efficiency and Economy, Butterworth- [1] Adumene, NSAS 2015, Heinemann, Great Britain. 'Predictive Analysis of Bare-

Page 143 [9] Bertram, V 2000, Practical Ship American Society of Marine Hydrodynamic, Great Britain, Engineers, New York. Inggris. [16] Harvald, SA 1992, [10] Charchalis, A 2013, Resistance and Propulsion of 'Designing Constraints in Ships, John Wiley and Sons, Evaluation of Ship Propulsion New York. Power', Journal of KONES [17] Herdzik, J 2013, 'Problems Powertrain and , pp. of propulsion systems and main 1-6. choice for offshore [11] Chun.et.al., HH 2013, support vessels', Scientific 'Experimental investigation on Journals Zeszyty Naukowe, vol stern-boat deployment system 2, no. 1733-8670, pp. 45-50. and operability for Korean coast [18] Jeng-Horng Chen, C-CC guard ship', International 2006, 'A Moving PIV System Journal Naval Architecture For Ship Model Test in Towing Ocean Engineering, pp. 488- Tank', Journal Ocean 503. Engineering, pp. 2025-2046. [12] D'arcalengelo, AM 1969, [19] Joe Longo, FS 2005, Ship Design and Contruction, 'Uncertainty Assessment For Professor of Naval Architecture Towing Tank Tests With and Example For Surface University of Machigan, Combatant DTMB Model Michigan. 5415', Journal of Ship [13] Degiuli.et.al., N 2017, Research, pp. 55-68. 'Increase of Ship Fuel [20] Kim, HC 1966, Consumption Due to the Added 'Hydrodinamic Aspect of Resistance in Waves', Journal Internal Pump Jet', Marine of Sustainable Development of Technology. Energy, Water and Environment [21] Kleppesto, K 2015, Systems, pp. 1-14. 'Empirical Prediction of [14] Etter, RAB&RJ 1975, Resistance of Fishing Vessels', 'Selection of Propulsion NTNU Trondheim Norwegion Systems for High Speed University of Science And Advanced Marine Vehicles ', Technology, pp. 1-87. SNAME. [22] Kowalski, A 2013, 'Cost [15] Etter, RJ 1976, Water Jet optimization of marine fuels Propulsion – An Interview, The consumption as important factor Winter Annual Meeting of The of control ship’s sulfur and

Page 144 nitrogen oxides emissions', Catamaran Form', International Scientific Journals, pp. 94-99. Journal of Technology, pp. 1- [23] Kuiper, G 1992, The 10. Wageningen Propeller Series, [30] Sladky, J 1976, Marine MARIN, Netherland. Propulsion, The Winter Annual [24] Lewis, EV 1988, Principles Meeting of The American of Naval Architecture Second Society of Marine Engineers, Revision, The Society of Naval New York. Architecs and Marine [31] Susanto.et.al., AD 2017, Engineers, New Jersey. 'Analysis of The Propulsion [25] M. Reichel, AMANLL System Towards The Speed 2014, 'Trim Optimisation - Reduction of Vessels Type PC- Theory and Practice', the 43', International Journal of International Journal on Engineering Research and Marine Navigation and Safety Application, pp. 8-15. of Sea Transportation, pp. 387- [32] Tabaczek, JK 2014, 392. 'Coefficients of Propeller-hull [26] Mohamad Pauzi Abdul Interaction in Propulsion Ghani, MNAR 2008, 'The System of Inland Waterway Prediction of Wake Wash in Vessels with Stern Tunnels', The Towing Tank', Jurnal International Journal on Mekanika, pp. 129-140. Marine Navigation and Safety [27] Premchand, PK 2015, of Sea Transportation, pp. 1-8. 'Numerical Investigation of the [33] Tupper, E 1975, Influence of Water Depth on Introduction to Naval Ship Resistance ', International Architecture, Great Britain, Journal of Computer Inggris. Applications , pp. 1-8. [34] Tupper, KR 2001, Basic [28] Samson, DIFAN 2015, Ship Theory, Great Britain, 'Effect of Fluid Density On Ship Inggris. Hull Resistance and Powering', [35] Watson, DGM 1998, International Journal of Practical Ship Design, Elsevier Engineering Research and Science Ltd, Netherlands. General Science, pp. 615-630. [36] WPA Van Lamerren, TL [29] Samuel, MI 2015, 'An 1984, Resistance Propulsion Inventigation Into The and Steering of Ship, Harleem Resistance Components of Holland, Holland. Converting a Traditional [37] Zelazny, K 2014, 'Amethod Monohull Fishing Vessel Into of Calculation of Ship

Page 145 Resistance on Calm Water Calculation of Mean Statistical Useful at Preliminary Stages of Value of Ship Service Speed On Ship Design', Scientific Journal a Given Shipping Line , Useful Maritime University of In Preliminary Design Stage', Szuczecin, pp. 125-130. Polish Maritime Research, pp. [38] Żelazny, K 2015, 'An 28-35. Approximate Method For

Page 146