Cultural Resource Sample Survey of Santa Rita Ranches, Socorro County, New Mexico

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cultural Resource Sample Survey of Santa Rita Ranches, Socorro County, New Mexico Cultural Resource Sample Survey of Santa Rita Ranches, Socorro County, New Mexico Woods Canyon Archaeological Consultants, Inc. December 2005 Cultural Resource Sample Survey of Santa Rita Ranches Development Project Socorro County, New Mexico by Jerry Fetterman Woods Canyon Archaeological Consultants, Inc. PO Box 253 Yellow Jacket, CO 81335 Submitted to New Mexico Land and Ranches P. O. Box 448, 113 Abeytia Avenue, Suite A Socorro, New Mexico 87801 NMCRIS Number 95,505 December 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION . 4 Personnel . 4 CHAPTER 2: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING . 5 CHAPTER 3: CULTURAL SETTING . 7 Prehistoric. 7 Historic . 9 CHAPTER 4: INVENTORY METHODS. 10 Literature Search . 10 Sample Survey Design . 10 Field Methods. 11 Sites. 11 Isolated Occurences . 11 CHAPTER 5: RESULTS . 12 Isolated Occurrences . 12 Sites . 12 LA31833 . 14 LA59286 . 17 LA150542 . 18 LA150543 . 19 LA150544 . 20 LA150545 . 21 LA150546 . 22 LA150547 . 23 LA150548 . 24 LA150549 . 25 LA150550 . 26 LA150551 . 27 LA150552 . 28 LA150553 . 29 LA150554 . 31 LA150555 . 32 LA150556 . 33 LA151415 . 34 LA151416 . 35 LA151417 . 36 LA151418 . 37 LA151419 . 38 CHAPTER 6: SUMMARY AND RECOMMENDATIONS . 39 CHAPTER 7: REFERENCES CITED . 41 i List of Figures Figure 1-1. Map illustrating location of Santa Rita Ranches development.. 4 Figure 2-1. Photograph of project area showing Rio Salado and Sierra Ladron . 5 Figure 2-2. Photograph of project area showing basalt dike and Bear Mountains . 5 Figure 4-1. Topographic map showing surveyed areas in relation to Santa Rita Ranches development. 10 Figure 5-1. Photographic overview of Riley town center, looking north-northeast. 15 Figure 5-2. Santa Rita Church . 15 Figure 5-3. Closeup of Structure R4 looking east . 15 Figure 5-4. Annotated aerial photograph of Riley town center.. 16 Figure 5-5. Plan map of LA59286.. 17 Figure 5-6. Plan map of LA15042.. 18 Figure 5-7. Plan map of LA150543.. 19 Figure 5-8. Plan map of LA150544.. 20 Figure 5-9. Plan map of LA150545.. 21 Figure 5-10. Plan map of LA150546.. 22 Figure 5-11. Plan map of LA150547.. 23 Figure 5-12. Plan map of LA150548.. 24 Figure 5-13. Plan map of LA150549.. ..
Recommended publications
  • The Middle Rio Grande Basin: Historical Descriptions and Reconstruction
    CHAPTER 4 THE MIDDLE RIO GRANDE BASIN: HISTORICAL DESCRIPTIONS AND RECONSTRUCTION This chapter provides an overview of the historical con- The main two basins are flanked by fault-block moun- ditions of the Middle Rio Grande Basin, with emphasis tains, such as the Sandias (Fig. 40), or volcanic uplifts, on the main stem of the river and its major tributaries in such as the Jemez, volcanic flow fields, and gravelly high the study region, including the Santa Fe River, Galisteo terraces of the ancestral Rio Grande, which began to flow Creek, Jemez River, Las Huertas Creek, Rio Puerco, and about 5 million years ago. Besides the mountains, other Rio Salado (Fig. 40). A general reconstruction of hydro- upland landforms include plateaus, mesas, canyons, pied- logical and geomorphological conditions of the Rio monts (regionally known as bajadas), volcanic plugs or Grande and major tributaries, based primarily on first- necks, and calderas (Hawley 1986: 23–26). Major rocks in hand, historical descriptions, is presented. More detailed these uplands include Precambrian granites; Paleozoic data on the historic hydrology-geomorphology of the Rio limestones, sandstones, and shales; and Cenozoic basalts. Grande and major tributaries are presented in Chapter 5. The rift has filled primarily with alluvial and fluvial sedi- Historic plant communities, and their dominant spe- ments weathered from rock formations along the main cies, are also discussed. Fauna present in the late prehis- and tributary watersheds. Much more recently, aeolian toric and historic periods is documented by archeological materials from abused land surfaces have been and are remains of bones from archeological sites, images of being deposited on the floodplain of the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidebook Contains Preliminary Findings of a Number of Concurrent Projects Being Worked on by the Trip Leaders
    TH FRIENDS OF THE PLEISTOCENE, ROCKY MOUNTAIN-CELL, 45 FIELD CONFERENCE PLIO-PLEISTOCENE STRATIGRAPHY AND GEOMORPHOLOGY OF THE CENTRAL PART OF THE ALBUQUERQUE BASIN OCTOBER 12-14, 2001 SEAN D. CONNELL New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources-Albuquerque Office, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 2808 Central Ave. SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 DAVID W. LOVE New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 JOHN D. SORRELL Tribal Hydrologist, Pueblo of Isleta, P.O. Box 1270, Isleta, NM 87022 J. BRUCE J. HARRISON Dept. of Earth and Environmental Sciences, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 Open-File Report 454C and D Initial Release: October 11, 2001 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801 NMBGMR OFR454 C & D INTRODUCTION This field-guide accompanies the 45th annual Rocky Mountain Cell of the Friends of the Pleistocene (FOP), held at Isleta Lakes, New Mexico. The Friends of the Pleistocene is an informal gathering of Quaternary geologists, geomorphologists, and pedologists who meet annually in the field. The field guide has been separated into two parts. Part C (open-file report 454C) contains the three-days of road logs and stop descriptions. Part D (open-file report 454D) contains a collection of mini-papers relevant to field-trip stops. This field guide is a companion to open-file report 454A and 454B, which accompanied a field trip for the annual meeting of the Rocky Mountain/South Central Section of the Geological Society of America, held in Albuquerque in late April.
    [Show full text]
  • Burned the Crucifixes and Other Religious Objects That Had Been Scattered in and Around the Pueblo. Otermin's Army Repeated This
    burned the crucifixes and other religious objects not successful in reestablishing Spanish rule of that had been scattered in and around the the Pueblos, the interviews and explorations pueblo. Otermin's army repeated this ritual at Otermin and Mendoza conducted give the most Alamillo and Sevilleta. A short distance from complete picture of the effects of the revolt Sevilleta the army found deep pits where the among the pueblos. The Spanish presidio at El Indians had cached corn and protected it with a Paso sent two more punitive expeditions to New shrine of herbs. feathers and a clay vessel Mexico in 1688 and 1689 but it was not until the modeled with a human face and the body of a toad term of Governor Don Diego de Vargas (1690-1696) (Hackett and Shelby 1942:I:cxxix). On the march that New Mexico was reclaimed by Spain. from Socorro to Isleta. the army passed through the burned remains of four estancias. The The Aftermath of the Revolt estancia of Las Barrancas, located 23 leagues beyond Senecu and ten leagues downstream from Documentation of the 12-year period following the Isleta, was the only estancia that had not been Pueblo Revolt is scarce but speculation and greatly vandalized and burned (Hackett and Shelby conjecture abound. The more dramatic recon­ 1942:cxxx). structions of life among the Pueblos after the revolt show the Pueblos having destroyed every Otermin staged a surprise attack, taking Isleta vestige of Hispanic culture, including household Pueblo on December 6, 1681. About 500 Isleta and and religious objects, domesticated animals and Piro Indians were living in the village at the cereal crops.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Rockhound Guide
    New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Socorro, New Mexico Information: 505-835-5420 Publications: 505-83-5490 FAX: 505-835-6333 A Division of New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology Dear “Rockhound” Thank you for your interest in mineral collecting in New Mexico. The New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources has put together this packet of material (we call it our “Rockhound Guide”) that we hope will be useful to you. This information is designed to direct people to localities where they may collect specimens and also to give them some brief information about the area. These sites have been chosen because they may be reached by passenger car. We hope the information included here will lead to many enjoyable hours of collecting minerals in the “Land of Enchantment.” Enjoy your excursion, but please follow these basic rules: Take only what you need for your own collection, leave what you can’t use. Keep New Mexico beautiful. If you pack it in, pack it out. Respect the rights of landowners and lessees. Make sure you have permission to collect on private land, including mines. Be extremely careful around old mines, especially mine shafts. Respect the desert climate. Carry plenty of water for yourself and your vehicle. Be aware of flash-flooding hazards. The New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources has a whole series of publications to assist in the exploration for mineral resources in New Mexico. These publications are reasonably priced at about the cost of printing. New Mexico State Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Bulletin 87, “Mineral and Water Resources of New Mexico,” describes the important mineral deposits of all types, as presently known in the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Ladron Peak 7.5-Minute Quadrangle, Socorro
    Geologic Map of the Ladron Peak Quadrangle, Socorro County, New Mexico By Adam S. Read, Steve M. Cather, Richard M. Chamberlin, Sean D. Connell, Stephen C. Hook, and Karl E. Karlstrom May, 2007 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Open-file Digital Geologic Map OF-GM 142 Scale 1:24,000 This work was supported by the U.S. Geological Survey, National Cooperative Geologic Mapping Program (STATEMAP) under USGS Cooperative Agreement 06HQPA0003 and the New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources. New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, New Mexico, 87801-4796 The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the author and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the U.S. Government or the State of New Mexico. Page 1 of 14 1 Map Unit Descriptions Ladron Peak 7.5-minute quadrangle Adam S. Read, Steve M. Cather, Richard M. Chamberlin, Sean D. Connell, Stephen C. Hook, and Karl E. Karlstrom 5-16-2007 Cenozoic Quaternary Quaternary geologic units were mapped in the field and using color digital orthophotographs and stereopair aerial photographs. Colors are denoted using Munsell notation (Kollmorgen, 1994). Pedogenic carbonate morphologic stages after Machette (1985). Anthropogenic and Surficial Deposits Thin surficial deposits derived from wind and mass-movement processes, or areas disturbed by human activities. af Artificial fill and disturbed land (modern) — dumped fill associated with construction of small dams. Qca Colluvium and alluvium, undivided (Holocene-Pleistocene) — poorly consolidated, poorly sorted and stratified, fine- to coarse-grained, clast- and matrix-supported, transport-limited deposits derived from a variety of mass- movement hillslope processes, including rock-fall, debris flow, shallow slump and creep.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology, Diversity, and Sustainability of the Middle Rio Grande Basin
    This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. Chapter 4 Geology, Climate, land, and Water Quality Douglas G. Fox USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Fort Collins, Colorado Roy Jemison USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Flagstaff, Arizona Deborah Ulinski PoHer USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Albuquerque, New Mexico H. Maurice VaieH University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico RayWaHs U.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins, Colorado GEOLOGY small extensions into Torrance, Santa Fe, Cibola, Rio Arriba, and Catron counties. The Middle Rio Grande is part of the chain of struc­ The principal landforms of the Middle Rio Grande tural basins, known as the Rio Grande depression, include: (1) pediments, (2) dissected slopes, (3) fault that extends from the San Luis Valley in Colorado to scarps, (4) terraces, (5) alluvial slopes, (6) alluvial fans El Paso, Texas, and through which the Rio Grande and cones, (7) major stream floodplains or valley flows (Chapin and Seager 1975). Bryan (1938) is cred­ bottoms, (8) eolian blankets and dunes, and (9) vol­ ited with designating this reach as the Rio Grande canic fields, ridges, and cones (Kelly 1977; "depression," because of his early research and the Fitzsimmons 1959). level of understanding he provided on the geology of the region. This area is also known as the Rio CHANNEL AND BASIN DESCRIPTIONS Grande "rift," a term coined by Kelly (1952), based on his belief in the possibility of significant longitu­ Lagasse (1981) described the channel of the Middle dinal displacement in the "trough" or depression Rio Grande as a shifting sand substratum with low, (Baltz 1978).
    [Show full text]
  • Nomenclature for Cenozoic Rocks of Northeast Mogollon-Datil Volcanic Field, New Mexico by Glenn R
    Datil and western Gallinas Mountains Stratigraphic unitsand in on northern Socorro Chupadera Peak Mountains Stratigraphic units in the south-central Chupadera Mountains Santa Fe Group and southeast Magdalena Mountains In the Socorro area, rocks of the Santa Fe Group have been separated into basins. In these places the top of the Popotosa Formation is placed arbitrarily Viks-~~~~ Peak~ ~ Tuff fDeal and Rhodes. 1976: Elston, 1976: formerly tuff of Wahoo Canyon in part of this areal-31.3 * N looking eost S a lower Popotosa Formation (Denny, 1940) and an overlying Sierra Ladrones at a mappable stratum or unconformity, below which the strata tend to be 2.6 my.; 0-250 fi(0-75 m); ash-flow tuffs. Formation (Machette, 1978). Within the main valley of the Rio Grande, the better indurated, have steeper dips, contain clasts mainly of volcanic rocks, Liight-gray, moderately welded, crystal-poor. pumiceous rhyolite ash-flow tuff. Normally thin, 0-40 ft (0-12 m), but thickens ldy >ZM ~ ~~~~~~ break between these two formations is mapped at the first occurrence of and are usually (but not always) redder in color. All Popotosa- and Sierra in ~lmvellcvsto -..ft~. 1260,. .. mb.~~~, Overlies with annular unconformitv units as old as the Swrs Formation. Contains 1-3s sani- New Mnieo Bumu of Mined & Miaenl hum Ladrones-type deposits above this level are then mapped as Santa Fe gravels dine phenocrysts and trace amounts of quartz, biotik. dinopyroxene.-and plagioclasc. ~exkllyvery crystal poor and aphanilic main-stem river deposits, which signal the integration of drainage to form the near base but becomes less crystal poor and more pumiceous upward.
    [Show full text]
  • Groundwater Level and Storage Changes in Basin-Fill Aquifers in the Rio Grande Basin, New Mexico
    GROUNDWATER LEVEL AND STORAGE CHANGES IN BASIN-FILL AQUIFERS IN THE RIO GRANDE BASIN, NEW MEXICO Alex J. Rinehart, Ethan Mamer, Trevor Kludt, Brigitte Felix, Cathryn Pokorny, and Stacy Timmons 1 New Mexico Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources, New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology, 801 Leroy Place, Socorro, NM 87801. Email: [email protected] Reviewers and Collaborators: Michael Johnson2, Nathan Myers3, and Geoffrey Rawling1 2 Hydrology Bureau, New Mexico Office of the State Engineer, P.O. Box 25102, Santa Fe, NM 87504 3 U.S. Geological Survey, 5338 Montgomery NE, Albuquerque, NM 87109 Final Progress Report June 2016 Navajo R Aztec rron S i ma a Lake o Raton Ci n ry er G Jua D Riv n Heron & C River Tierra r a a El Vado Amarilla n n d a Lake R e Taos d Clayton io i Ch a am n Abiquiu a 25 R i Lake v e Mora r Los Alamos P e Mosquero J c e Santa o m s Fe Gallup e R z Las i Conchas v Ute 40 R e Vegas i r Lake Lake ve r Bernalillo Grants Santa Rosa Tucumcari er Albuquerque Riv Lake ni 40 Zu R Santa i Los o Estancia Rosa Sumner P Lunas u Lake e r c o Fort Clovis Sumner Portales Socorro Reserve 25 o c s Carrizozo i c r n e Roswell v a i r Elephant Ruidoso F R Truth or Butte Rio n Consequences Hondo Sa Lake r M e Silver Lovington v Caballo Alamogordo i i m R City Reservoir b Rio P l a r eña Gi e sco s N R Brantley i WE v Lake Lordsburg e r R i S o Las Cruces Carlsbad G 0 50 mi 10 r Deming a n d 10 e 0 50 km NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF GEOLOGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES DISCLAIMER The New Mexico Water Resource Research Institute and affiliated institutions make no warranties, express or implied, as to the use of the information obtained from this data product.
    [Show full text]
  • Ground-Water Resources of Socorro County, New Mexico
    GROUND-WATER RESOURCES OF SOCORRO COUNTY, NEW MEXICO By F. Eileen Roybal U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Water-Resources Investigations Report 89-4083 Prepared in cooperation with the NEW MEXICO STATE ENGINEER OFFICE and the NEW MEXICO BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Albuquerque, New Mexico 1991 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, JR., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, Director For additional information Copies of this report can be write to: purchased from: District Chief U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Geological Survey Water Resources Division Books and Open-File Reports Pinetree Office Park Federal Center, Building 810 4501 Indian School Rd. NE, Suite 200 Box 25425 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87110 Denver, Colorado 80225 CONTENTS Page Abstract ............................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................... 2 Purpose and scope ............................................... 2 Regional setting ................................................ 2 Previous investigations ......................................... 6 Acknowledgments ................................................. 6 Geologic history and structure ....................................... 7 Ground-water resources ............................................... 11 Quaternary deposits ............................................. 13 Quaternary and Tertiary Santa Fe Group .......................... 14 Tertiary rocks .................................................. 18 Tertiary volcanics ........................................
    [Show full text]
  • Magdalena Ranger District Background for Survey
    MAGDALENA RANGER DISTRICT BACKGROUND FOR SURVEY Matt Basham District Archaeologist Forest Service Report No. 2011-03-030 Cibola National Forest, Albuquerque TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... ii LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... ii I. INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 1 II. ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW ............................................................................................................... 2 III. PREHISTORIC OCCUPATION ............................................................................................................... 6 IV. HISTORIC OCCUPATION ................................................................................................................... 13 V. SURVEY STANDARDS FOR CONTRACTORS .......................................................................................... 22 VI. MAGDALENA CUSTOM LA FORM ................................................................................................... 25 VII. REFERENCES CITED ......................................................................................................................... 27 APPENDIX A – COMMON CERAMIC TYPES ON THE MAGDALENA RANGER DISTRICT ...............................
    [Show full text]