Biochemical Characterization of FAN1 Nuclease

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Biochemical Characterization of FAN1 Nuclease Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2016 Biochemical Characterization of FAN1 Nuclease Pizzolato, Julia Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-128687 Dissertation Originally published at: Pizzolato, Julia. Biochemical Characterization of FAN1 Nuclease. 2016, University of Zurich, Faculty of Science. Biochemical Characterization of FAN1 Nuclease Dissertation zur Erlangung der naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorwürde (Dr. sc. nat.) vorgelegt der Mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität Zürich von Julia Pizzolato von Zürich, ZH Promotionskomitee Prof. Dr. Josef Jiricny (Vorsitz, Leitung der Dissertation) Prof. Dr. Alessandro A. Sartori Prof. Dr. Orlando D. Schärer Prof. Dr. Lumir Krejci Zürich, 2016 Table of contents Table of contents Table of contents ..................................................................................................................... 1 Zusammenfassung .................................................................................................................. 3 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 4 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 DNA damage and repair ................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Replication and replication stress ................................................................................... 6 1.2.1 Eukaryotic DNA replication ...................................................................................... 6 1.2.2 Replication stress .................................................................................................... 8 1.2.3 Recovery of stalled replication forks ........................................................................ 9 1.3 Interstrand cross-link repair (ICL repair) ....................................................................... 10 1.3.1 Overview of the ICL repair pathway ....................................................................... 10 1.3.2 Types of ICL inducing agents ................................................................................ 11 1.3.3 Fanconi anemia proteins and pathway .................................................................. 12 1.3.4 Unhooking step in ICL repair ................................................................................. 15 1.3.5 Translesion polymerases and their roles in ICL repair .......................................... 18 1.3.6 Homologous recombination and ICL repair ........................................................... 20 1.3.7 Nucleotide excision repair and ICL repair .............................................................. 24 1.3.8 ICL repair in the Xenopus system .......................................................................... 25 1.3.9 Replication traverse of ICLs ................................................................................... 26 1.3.10 Replication-independent ICL repair ..................................................................... 27 1.3.11 ICL repair by glycosylases ................................................................................... 28 1.3.12 ICL repair in yeast ................................................................................................ 29 1.4 FEN1 ............................................................................................................................. 30 1.5 FAN1 ............................................................................................................................. 31 1.5.1 FAN1 discovery ..................................................................................................... 31 1.5.2 Roles of FAN1 outside of ICL repair ...................................................................... 32 1.5.3 FAN1 in Schizosaccharomyces pombe ................................................................. 32 1.5.4 FAN1 structure ....................................................................................................... 33 1.5.5 FAN1 in diseases ................................................................................................... 35 1.6 My aim ........................................................................................................................... 35 2 Results ................................................................................................................................. 37 2.1 FANCD2-associated Nuclease 1, but not Exonuclease 1 or Flap Endonuclease 1, is able to unhook DNA interstrand cross-links in vitro ............................................................ 37 2.2 Additional Observations ................................................................................................ 48 1 Table of contents 2.2.1 5' Flap cleavage activity in human TSCRE2 extracts ............................................ 48 2.2.2 FEN1 is responsible for almost all 5' flap cleavage in chicken cell extracts, but FAN1 activity becomes detectable upon overexpression ............................................... 49 2.2.3 FEN1 depletion sensitizes chicken cells to MMC and this effect can be rescued by FAN1 overexpression ..................................................................................................... 51 2.2.4 FAN1 protein levels in human cells are higher in the absence of FEN1 protein .... 52 3 Discussion .......................................................................................................................... 54 3.1 In vitro unhooking activity .............................................................................................. 54 3.2 In vivo implications of FAN1 unhooking activity ............................................................ 55 3.3 Evidence for FAN1 involvement in processes other than ICL unhooking ..................... 56 3.3.1 Replication fork recovery ....................................................................................... 57 3.3.2 Homologous recombination ................................................................................... 57 3.4 FAN1 and FEN1 ............................................................................................................ 58 3.5 FAN1 and SNM1A ......................................................................................................... 59 3.6 Potential parallel pathways to repair ICLs ..................................................................... 59 4 Conclusions and perspectives .......................................................................................... 61 5 Materials and Methods to section 2.2 ............................................................................... 62 5.1 Substrates for endonuclease assays ............................................................................ 62 5.2 Culturing of DT40 chicken cells ..................................................................................... 62 5.3 Culturing of TSCER2 cell lines and nuclear extract preparation ................................... 62 5.4 FAN1 overexpression in DT40 FEN1 KO cells ............................................................. 62 5.5 Preparation of whole cell extracts from DT40 cells ....................................................... 62 5.6 Nuclease assays with DT40 extracts ............................................................................ 63 5.7 Methylcellulose survival assay with DT40 cells ............................................................. 63 5.8 quantitative real-time (RT) PCR .................................................................................... 63 5.9 Antibodies ..................................................................................................................... 63 5.10 siRNAs ........................................................................................................................ 64 6 References .......................................................................................................................... 65 7 Acknowledgements ............................................................................................................ 76 8 Curriculum Vitae ................................................................................................................. 77 2 Zusammenfassung Zusammenfassung DNS-Reparaturmechanismen sind essentiell, um die genomische Stabilität aufrecht zu erhalten und dadurch auch um Krebs entgegenzuwirken. DNS Interstrangvernetzungen (ICLs), die beide DNS-Stränge kovalent miteinander verbinden, gehören zu den gefährlichsten DNS Schäden, da sie sowohl die Transkription als auch die Replikation blockieren. In höheren Eukaryoten werden ICLs auf eine komplizierte Art und Weise repariert und viele verschiedene DNS-Reparaturmechanismen sind daran beteiligt, wie Transläsionssynthese (TLS), Nukleotidexzisionsreparatur (NER) und homologe Rekombination (HR). Proteine der Fanconi-Anämie Komplementationsgruppe werden für die Koordination der Reparatur benötigt. Patienten mit Mutationen in Genen, welche für diese Proteine kodieren leiden an der schwerwiegenden, genetischen Krankheit Fanconi-Anämie. Der ICL-Reparaturweg beginnt mit dem Aushaken der Vernetzung
Recommended publications
  • Endogenous Reverse Transcriptase and Rnase H-Mediated Antiviral Mechanism in Embryonic Stem Cells
    www.nature.com/cr www.cell-research.com ARTICLE Endogenous reverse transcriptase and RNase H-mediated antiviral mechanism in embryonic stem cells Junyu Wu1, Chunyan Wu1, Fan Xing1, Liu Cao1, Weijie Zeng1, Liping Guo1, Ping Li1, Yongheng Zhong1, Hualian Jiang1, Manhui Luo1, Guang Shi2, Lang Bu1, Yanxi Ji1, Panpan Hou1, Hong Peng1, Junjiu Huang2, Chunmei Li1 and Deyin Guo 1 Nucleic acid-based systems play important roles in antiviral defense, including CRISPR/Cas that adopts RNA-guided DNA cleavage to prevent DNA phage infection and RNA interference (RNAi) that employs RNA-guided RNA cleavage to defend against RNA virus infection. Here, we report a novel type of nucleic acid-based antiviral system that exists in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs), which suppresses RNA virus infection by DNA-mediated RNA cleavage. We found that the viral RNA of encephalomyocarditis virus can be reverse transcribed into complementary DNA (vcDNA) by the reverse transcriptase (RTase) encoded by endogenous retrovirus-like elements in mESCs. The vcDNA is negative-sense single-stranded and forms DNA/RNA hybrid with viral RNA. The viral RNA in the heteroduplex is subsequently destroyed by cellular RNase H1, leading to robust suppression of viral growth. Furthermore, either inhibition of the RTase activity or depletion of endogenous RNase H1 results in the promotion of virus proliferation. Altogether, our results provide intriguing insights into the antiviral mechanism of mESCs and the antiviral function of endogenized retroviruses and cellular RNase H. Such a natural nucleic acid-based antiviral mechanism in mESCs is referred to as ERASE (endogenous RTase/RNase H-mediated antiviral system), which is an addition to the previously known nucleic acid-based antiviral mechanisms including CRISPR/Cas in bacteria and RNAi in plants and invertebrates.
    [Show full text]
  • Restriction Endonucleases
    Molecular Biology Problem Solver: A Laboratory Guide. Edited by Alan S. Gerstein Copyright © 2001 by Wiley-Liss, Inc. ISBNs: 0-471-37972-7 (Paper); 0-471-22390-5 (Electronic) 9 Restriction Endonucleases Derek Robinson, Paul R. Walsh, and Joseph A. Bonventre Background Information . 226 Which Restriction Enzymes Are Commercially Available? . 226 Why Are Some Enzymes More Expensive Than Others? . 227 What Can You Do to Reduce the Cost of Working with Restriction Enzymes? . 228 If You Could Select among Several Restriction Enzymes for Your Application, What Criteria Should You Consider to Make the Most Appropriate Choice? . 229 What Are the General Properties of Restriction Endonucleases? . 232 What Insight Is Provided by a Restriction Enzyme’s Quality Control Data? . 233 How Stable Are Restriction Enzymes? . 236 How Stable Are Diluted Restriction Enzymes? . 236 Simple Digests . 236 How Should You Set up a Simple Restriction Digest? . 236 Is It Wise to Modify the Suggested Reaction Conditions? . 237 Complex Restriction Digestions . 239 How Can a Substrate Affect the Restriction Digest? . 239 Should You Alter the Reaction Volume and DNA Concentration? . 241 Double Digests: Simultaneous or Sequential? . 242 225 Genomic Digests . 244 When Preparing Genomic DNA for Southern Blotting, How Can You Determine If Complete Digestion Has Been Obtained? . 244 What Are Your Options If You Must Create Additional Rare or Unique Restriction Sites? . 247 Troubleshooting . 255 What Can Cause a Simple Restriction Digest to Fail? . 255 The Volume of Enzyme in the Vial Appears Very Low. Did Leakage Occur during Shipment? . 259 The Enzyme Shipment Sat on the Shipping Dock for Two Days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role and Mechanisms of Action of Micrornas in Cancer Drug Resistance Wengong Si1,2,3, Jiaying Shen4, Huilin Zheng1,5 and Weimin Fan1,6*
    Si et al. Clinical Epigenetics (2019) 11:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s13148-018-0587-8 REVIEW Open Access The role and mechanisms of action of microRNAs in cancer drug resistance Wengong Si1,2,3, Jiaying Shen4, Huilin Zheng1,5 and Weimin Fan1,6* Abstract MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs with a length of about 19–25 nt, which can regulate various target genes and are thus involved in the regulation of a variety of biological and pathological processes, including the formation and development of cancer. Drug resistance in cancer chemotherapy is one of the main obstacles to curing this malignant disease. Statistical data indicate that over 90% of the mortality of patients with cancer is related to drug resistance. Drug resistance of cancer chemotherapy can be caused by many mechanisms, such as decreased antitumor drug uptake, modified drug targets, altered cell cycle checkpoints, or increased DNA damage repair, among others. In recent years, many studies have shown that miRNAs are involved in the drug resistance of tumor cells by targeting drug-resistance-related genes or influencing genes related to cell proliferation, cell cycle, and apoptosis. A single miRNA often targets a number of genes, and its regulatory effect is tissue-specific. In this review, we emphasize the miRNAs that are involved in the regulation of drug resistance among different cancers and probe the mechanisms of the deregulated expression of miRNAs. The molecular targets of miRNAs and their underlying signaling pathways are also explored comprehensively. A holistic understanding of the functions of miRNAs in drug resistance will help us develop better strategies to regulate them efficiently and will finally pave the way toward better translation of miRNAs into clinics, developing them into a promising approach in cancer therapy.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphate Steering by Flap Endonuclease 1 Promotes 50-flap Specificity and Incision to Prevent Genome Instability
    ARTICLE Received 18 Jan 2017 | Accepted 5 May 2017 | Published 27 Jun 2017 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms15855 OPEN Phosphate steering by Flap Endonuclease 1 promotes 50-flap specificity and incision to prevent genome instability Susan E. Tsutakawa1,*, Mark J. Thompson2,*, Andrew S. Arvai3,*, Alexander J. Neil4,*, Steven J. Shaw2, Sana I. Algasaier2, Jane C. Kim4, L. David Finger2, Emma Jardine2, Victoria J.B. Gotham2, Altaf H. Sarker5, Mai Z. Her1, Fahad Rashid6, Samir M. Hamdan6, Sergei M. Mirkin4, Jane A. Grasby2 & John A. Tainer1,7 DNA replication and repair enzyme Flap Endonuclease 1 (FEN1) is vital for genome integrity, and FEN1 mutations arise in multiple cancers. FEN1 precisely cleaves single-stranded (ss) 50-flaps one nucleotide into duplex (ds) DNA. Yet, how FEN1 selects for but does not incise the ss 50-flap was enigmatic. Here we combine crystallographic, biochemical and genetic analyses to show that two dsDNA binding sites set the 50polarity and to reveal unexpected control of the DNA phosphodiester backbone by electrostatic interactions. Via ‘phosphate steering’, basic residues energetically steer an inverted ss 50-flap through a gateway over FEN1’s active site and shift dsDNA for catalysis. Mutations of these residues cause an 18,000-fold reduction in catalytic rate in vitro and large-scale trinucleotide (GAA)n repeat expansions in vivo, implying failed phosphate-steering promotes an unanticipated lagging-strand template-switch mechanism during replication. Thus, phosphate steering is an unappreciated FEN1 function that enforces 50-flap specificity and catalysis, preventing genomic instability. 1 Molecular Biophysics and Integrated Bioimaging, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • Phosphodiesterase 1B Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Exaggerated Locomotor Hyperactivity and DARPP-32 Phosphorylation in Response to Dopa
    The Journal of Neuroscience, June 15, 2002, 22(12):5188–5197 Phosphodiesterase 1B Knock-Out Mice Exhibit Exaggerated Locomotor Hyperactivity and DARPP-32 Phosphorylation in Response to Dopamine Agonists and Display Impaired Spatial Learning Tracy M. Reed,1,3 David R. Repaske,2* Gretchen L. Snyder,4 Paul Greengard,4 and Charles V. Vorhees1* Divisions of 1Developmental Biology and 2Endocrinology, Children’s Hospital Research Foundation, Cincinnati, Ohio 45229, 3Department of Biology, College of Mount St. Joseph, Cincinnati, Ohio 45233, and 4Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Neuroscience, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021 Using homologous recombination, we generated mice lack- maze spatial-learning deficits. These results indicate that en- ing phosphodiesterase-mediated (PDE1B) cyclic nucleotide- hancement of cyclic nucleotide signaling by inactivation of hydrolyzing activity. PDE1B Ϫ/Ϫ mice showed exaggerated PDE1B-mediated cyclic nucleotide hydrolysis plays a signifi- hyperactivity after acute D-methamphetamine administra- cant role in dopaminergic function through the DARPP-32 and tion. Striatal slices from PDE1B Ϫ/Ϫ mice exhibited increased related transduction pathways. levels of phospho-Thr 34 DARPP-32 and phospho-Ser 845 Key words: phosphodiesterases; DARPP-32; dopamine- GluR1 after dopamine D1 receptor agonist or forskolin stimu- stimulated locomotor activity; spatial learning and memory; lation. PDE1B Ϫ/Ϫ and PDE1B ϩ/Ϫ mice demonstrated Morris Morris water maze; methamphetamine; SKF81297; forskolin Calcium/calmodulin-dependent phosphodiesterases (CaM- (CaMKII) and calcineurin and have the potential to activate PDEs) are members of one of 11 families of PDEs (Soderling et CaM-PDEs. Dopamine D1 or D2 receptor activation leads to al., 1999;Yuasa et al., 2001) and comprise the only family that acts adenylyl cyclase activation or inhibition, respectively (Traficante ϩ as a potential point of interaction between the Ca 2 and cyclic et al., 1976; Monsma et al., 1990; Cunningham and Kelley, 1993; nucleotide signaling pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • S1 Nuclease Degrades Single-Stranded Nucleic Acids, Releasing 5'-Phosphoryl Mono- Or Oligonucleotides
    Description S1 Nuclease degrades single-stranded nucleic acids, releasing 5'-phosphoryl mono- or oligonucleotides. It is five times more active on DNA than on RNA (1). S1 Nuclease also cleaves dsDNA at the single-stranded region caused by a nick, gap, mismatch or loop. PRODUCT INFORMATION S1 Nuclease exhibits 3’-phosphomonoesterase activity. S1 Nuclease The enzyme is a glycoprotein with a carbohydrate content of 18%. Pub. No. MAN0013722 Applications Rev. Date 29 November 2016 (Rev. A.00) Removal of single-stranded overhangs of DNA #_ fragments (2). S1 transcript mapping (3, 4). Lot: _ Expiry Date: _ Cleavage of hairpin loops. Creation of unidirectional deletions in DNA fragments in Store at -20 °C conjunction with Exo III (5). Source Aspergillus oryzae cells. Components #EN0321 100 U/µL S1 Nuclease 10000 U 5X Reaction Buffer 2 1 mL www.thermofisher.com For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. Definition of Activity Unit CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS One unit of the enzyme produces 1 µg of acid soluble S1 Nuclease was tested for the absence of deoxyribonucleotides in 1 min at 37 °C. contaminating double-stranded DNA specific nuclease Enzyme activity is assayed in the following mixture: activity. 30 mM sodium-acetate (pH 4.5), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM ZnCl2, 5% (v/v) glycerol, 800 µg/mL heat Quality authorized by: Jurgita Zilinskiene denatured calf thymus DNA. Storage Buffer The enzyme is supplied in: 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.5), 50 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM ZnCl2 and 50% (v/v) glycerol. 5X Reaction Buffer 200 mM sodium acetate (pH 4.5 at 25 °C), 1.5 M NaCl and 10 mM ZnSO4.
    [Show full text]
  • Principles and Applications of Rabbit Models for Atherosclerosis Research
    J Atheroscler Thromb, 2018; 25: 213-220. http://doi.org/10.5551/jat.RV17018 Review Principles and Applications of Rabbit Models for Atherosclerosis Research Jianglin Fan1, Yajie Chen1, Haizhao Yan1, Manabu Niimi1, Yanli Wang2 and Jingyan Liang3 1Department of Molecular Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, University of Yamanashi, Yamanashi, Japan 2Department of Pathology, Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, China 3Research Center for Vascular Biology, Yangzhou University School of Medicine, Yangzhou, China Rabbits are one of the most used experimental animals for biomedical research, particularly as a bio- reactor for the production of antibodies. However, many unique features of the rabbit have also made it as an excellent species for examining a number of aspects of human diseases such as atherosclerosis. Rabbits are phylogenetically closer to humans than rodents, in addition to their relatively proper size, tame disposition, and ease of use and maintenance in the laboratory facility. Due to their short life spans, short gestation periods, high numbers of progeny, low cost (compared with other large ani- mals) and availability of genomics and proteomics, rabbits usually serve to bridge the gap between smaller rodents (mice and rats) and larger animals, such as dogs, pigs and monkeys, and play an important role in many translational research activities such as pre-clinical testing of drugs and diag- nostic methods for patients. The principle of using rabbits rather than other animals as an experi- mental model is very simple: rabbits should be used for research, such as translational research, that is difficult to accomplish with other species. Recently, rabbit genome sequencing and transcriptomic profiling of atherosclerosis have been successfully completed, which has paved a new way for researchers to use this model in the future.
    [Show full text]
  • FAN1 Nuclease Activity Affects CAG Expansion and Age at Onset of Huntington's Disease
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.13.439716; this version posted April 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. McAllister, Donaldson et al FAN1 nuclease activity affects CAG expansion and age at onset of Huntington's disease Branduff McAllister, PhD1+, Jasmine Donaldson, PhD1+, Caroline S. Binda, PhD1, Sophie Powell, BSc1, Uroosa Chughtai, BSc1, Gareth Edwards, PhD1, Joseph Stone, BA1, Sergey Lobanov, PhD1, Linda Elliston, MPhil1, Laura-Nadine Schuhmacher, PhD1, Elliott Rees, PhD1, Georgina Menzies, PhD2, Marc Ciosi, PhD3, Alastair Maxwell, PhD3, Michael J. Chao, PhD4, Eun Pyo Hong, PhD4, Diane Lucente, MS4, Vanessa Wheeler, PhD4, Jong-Min Lee, PhD4,5, Marcy E. MacDonald, PhD4,5, Jeffrey D. Long, PhD6, Elizabeth H. Aylward, PhD7, G. Bernhard Landwehrmeyer, MD PhD8, Anne E. Rosser, MB BChir, PhD9,10, REGISTRY Investigators of the European Huntington’s disease network11, Jane S. Paulsen, PhD12, PREDICT-HD Investigators of the Huntington Study Group13, Nigel M. Williams, PhD1, James F. Gusella, PhD4,5, Darren G. Monckton, PhD3, Nicholas D. Allen, PhD2, Peter Holmans, PhD1, Lesley Jones, PhD1,14* & Thomas H. Massey, BM BCh, DPhil1,15* 1 Division of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neurosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF24 4HQ, United Kingdom 2 School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX,
    [Show full text]
  • WO 2017/147196 Al 31 August 2017 (31.08.2017) P O P C T
    (12) INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION PUBLISHED UNDER THE PATENT COOPERATION TREATY (PCT) (19) World Intellectual Property Organization International Bureau (10) International Publication Number (43) International Publication Date WO 2017/147196 Al 31 August 2017 (31.08.2017) P O P C T (51) International Patent Classification: Kellie, E. [US/US]; 70 Lanark Road, Maiden, MA 02148 C12Q 1/68 (2006.01) (US). COLE, Michael, B. [US/US]; 233 1 Eunice Street, Berkeley, CA 94708 (US). YOSEF, Nir [IL/US]; 1520 (21) International Application Number: Laurel Ave., Richmond, CA 94805 (US). GAYO, En¬ PCT/US20 17/0 18963 rique, Martin [ES/US]; 115 Peterborough Street, Boston, (22) International Filing Date: MA 022 15 (US). OUYANG, Zhengyu [CN/US]; 15 Vas- 22 February 2017 (22.02.2017) sar Street, Medford, MA 02155 (US). YU, Xu [CN/US]; 6 Whittier Place, Apt. 16j, Boston, MA 02 114 (US). (25) Filing Language: English (74) Agents: KOWALSKI, Thomas, J. et al; Vedder Price English (26) Publication Language: P.C., 1633 Broadway, New York, NY 1001 9 (US). (30) Priority Data: (81) Designated States (unless otherwise indicated, for every 62/298,349 22 February 2016 (22.02.2016) US kind of national protection available): AE, AG, AL, AM, (71) Applicants: MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF AO, AT, AU, AZ, BA, BB, BG, BH, BN, BR, BW, BY, TECHNOLOGY [US/US]; 77 Massachusetts Ave., Cam BZ, CA, CH, CL, CN, CO, CR, CU, CZ, DE, DJ, DK, DM, bridge, MA 02139 (US). THE REGENTS OF THE UNI¬ DO, DZ, EC, EE, EG, ES, FI, GB, GD, GE, GH, GM, GT, VERSITY OF CALIFORNIA [US/US]; 1111 Franklin HN, HR, HU, ID, IL, IN, IR, IS, JP, KE, KG, KH, KN, Street, 12th Floor, Oakland, CA 94607 (US).
    [Show full text]
  • Disruption of the Aldolase a Tetramer Into Catalytically Active Monomers PETER T
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 93, pp. 5374-5379, May 1996 Biochemistry Disruption of the aldolase A tetramer into catalytically active monomers PETER T. BEERNINK* AND DEAN R. TOLANt Biology Department, Boston University, Boston, MA 02215 Communicated by Irwin A. Rose, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, January 22, 1996 (received for review August 30, 1995) ABSTRACT The fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (EC interface loop of TIM resulted in a stable monomer with a 4.1.2.13) homotetramer has been destabilized by site-directed 103-fold reduction in kcat (11, 12). These studies have suggested mutagenesis at the two different subunit interfaces. A double that the quaternary structure is essential for proper catalytic mutant aldolase, Q125D/E224A, sediments as two distinct activity. species, characteristic of a slow equilibrium, with velocities Fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase (Fru-1,6-P2; EC 4.1.2.13) is expected for the monomer and tetramer. The aldolase mono- an isologous homotetramer (Fig. 1A), each subunit ofwhich is an mer is shown to be catalytically active following isolation from eight-membered acq-barrel containing an active site near its sucrose density gradients. The isolated aldolase monomer had center (13). The two major subunit interfaces (A and B) are 72% of the specific activity of the wild-type enzyme and a distant (>20 A) from the Schiff base-forming Lys-229 (Fig. iB), slightly lower Michaelis constant, clearly indicating that the and aldolase does not exhibit cooperativity or allostery. Isolated quaternary structure is not required for catalysis. Cross- hybrids of isozymes indicated that subunits are catalytically linking of the isolated monomer confirmed that it does not independent; for example, A3B1 was indistinguishable from an rapidly reequilibrate with the tetramer following isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Structure and Function of Nucleases in DNA Repair: Shape, Grip and Blade of the DNA Scissors
    Oncogene (2002) 21, 9022 – 9032 ª 2002 Nature Publishing Group All rights reserved 0950 – 9232/02 $25.00 www.nature.com/onc Structure and function of nucleases in DNA repair: shape, grip and blade of the DNA scissors Tatsuya Nishino1 and Kosuke Morikawa*,1 1Department of Structural Biology, Biomolecular Engineering Research Institute (BERI), 6-2-3 Furuedai, Suita, Osaka 565-0874, Japan DNA nucleases catalyze the cleavage of phosphodiester mismatched nucleotides. They also recognize the bonds. These enzymes play crucial roles in various DNA replication or recombination intermediates to facilitate repair processes, which involve DNA replication, base the following reaction steps through the cleavage of excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, mismatch DNA strands (Table 1). repair, and double strand break repair. In recent years, Nucleases can be regarded as molecular scissors, new nucleases involved in various DNA repair processes which cleave phosphodiester bonds between the sugars have been reported, including the Mus81 : Mms4 (Eme1) and the phosphate moieties of DNA. They contain complex, which functions during the meiotic phase and conserved minimal motifs, which usually consist of the Artemis : DNA-PK complex, which processes a V(D)J acidic and basic residues forming the active site. recombination intermediate. Defects of these nucleases These active site residues coordinate catalytically cause genetic instability or severe immunodeficiency. essential divalent cations, such as magnesium, Thus, structural biology on various nuclease actions is calcium, manganese or zinc, as a cofactor. However, essential for the elucidation of the molecular mechanism the requirements for actual cleavage, such as the types of complex DNA repair machinery. Three-dimensional and the numbers of metals, are very complicated, but structural information of nucleases is also rapidly are not common among the nucleases.
    [Show full text]
  • Directions for Use Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase, Recombinant (Rsap)
    Directions for Use Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase, Recombinant (rSAP) Code Description Size 1B1633-1KU Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase, Recombinant (rSAP) 1 vial, 1000 units (1 U/µL) 1B1633-5KU Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase, Recombinant (rSAP) 5 vials, 1000 units each (1 U/µL) General Information Shrimp Alkaline Phosphatase, Recombinant (rSAP) is a heat-labile hydrolase enzyme produced in Pichia Pastoris that removes phosphate groups nonspecifically from 5’ ends of nucleic acid phosphomonoesters and proteins. This activity is most commonly utilized in molecular cloning to prevent self-ligation of linearized plasmid DNA and in 5’ end-labeling to facilitate the replacement of unlabeled phosphates with labeled phosphate groups. rSAP also prepares PCR products for DNA sequencing or SNP analysis, by dephosphorylating unincorporated dNTPs that would otherwise interfere with enzymatic reactions. VWR Life Science AMRESCO’s rSAP may be directly added to restriction enzyme digests and is conveniently inactivated 100% by heating at 65°C. This eliminates the need for vector purification, a step that is necessary when using alkaline phosphatases isolated from other sources, such as E. coli and calf intestine. rSAP works well in common buffers and does not require supplemental zinc or other additives. Removes 5’-phosphates from DNA, RNA, dNTPs and proteins Improves cloning efficiency by preventing vector recircularization 100% heat-inactivated at 65°C No vector purification necessary Removes unincorporated dNTPs in PCR products prior to DNA sequencing or SNP analysis Prepares templates for 5’-end labeling Dephosphorylates proteins Works in many different buffers without supplemental factors AMRESCO, LLC Corporate Headquarters, 28600 Fountain Parkway, Solon, OH 44139 Directions for Use Storage/Stability Stable at least 2 years when stored frozen (0 to -20°C).
    [Show full text]