New Zealand Nautical Almanac
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
HELIOGRAPH DESCRIPTION: the Heliograph Was a Communications Device Used to Transmit Messages Over Long Distances. It Uses a Mi
HELIOGRAPH DESCRIPTION: The heliograph was a communications device used to transmit messages over long distances. It uses a mirror attached to a surveying device to direct a beam of light to a receiving station. Sunlight is used as the light source. Messages could be sent in any direction during daylight hours. If the sun was in front of the sender, the sun’s rays were reflected directly from the sender to the receiving station. If the sun was behind the sender, a secondary mirror was used to reflect the rays toward the receiving station. A keying system was used to generate the flashes required to transmit messages using the Morse Code. The distance that the signals could be seen depended on several variables. A clear line of sight was required and Heliograph at Fort because of the curvature of the earth, the heliograph stations were Bowie Visitor Center located on the highest convenient point. The clarity of the sky and the size of the mirrors were also significant factors. The maximum range was about 10 miles for each inch of mirror diameter. Under normal conditions using the naked eye, a flash could be seen for about 30 miles, much farther using a telescope. The speed at which messages could be sent was dependent on the proficiency of both the sender and the receiver. EARLY HISYORY: A forerunner to the heliograph, the heliotrope, was developed by Professor Carl Friedrich Gauss of the University of Gottingen in Germany. The heliotrope was used to direct a controlled beam of sunlight to a distant station to be used as a survey marker. -
Battle Management Language: History, Employment and NATO Technical Activities
Battle Management Language: History, Employment and NATO Technical Activities Mr. Kevin Galvin Quintec Mountbatten House, Basing View, Basingstoke Hampshire, RG21 4HJ UNITED KINGDOM [email protected] ABSTRACT This paper is one of a coordinated set prepared for a NATO Modelling and Simulation Group Lecture Series in Command and Control – Simulation Interoperability (C2SIM). This paper provides an introduction to the concept and historical use and employment of Battle Management Language as they have developed, and the technical activities that were started to achieve interoperability between digitised command and control and simulation systems. 1.0 INTRODUCTION This paper provides a background to the historical employment and implementation of Battle Management Languages (BML) and the challenges that face the military forces today as they deploy digitised C2 systems and have increasingly used simulation tools to both stimulate the training of commanders and their staffs at all echelons of command. The specific areas covered within this section include the following: • The current problem space. • Historical background to the development and employment of Battle Management Languages (BML) as technology evolved to communicate within military organisations. • The challenges that NATO and nations face in C2SIM interoperation. • Strategy and Policy Statements on interoperability between C2 and simulation systems. • NATO technical activities that have been instigated to examine C2Sim interoperation. 2.0 CURRENT PROBLEM SPACE “Linking sensors, decision makers and weapon systems so that information can be translated into synchronised and overwhelming military effect at optimum tempo” (Lt Gen Sir Robert Fulton, Deputy Chief of Defence Staff, 29th May 2002) Although General Fulton made that statement in 2002 at a time when the concept of network enabled operations was being formulated by the UK and within other nations, the requirement remains extant. -
Global Maritime Distress and Safety System (GMDSS) Handbook 2018 I CONTENTS
FOREWORD This handbook has been produced by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA), and is intended for use on ships that are: • compulsorily equipped with GMDSS radiocommunication installations in accordance with the requirements of the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea Convention 1974 (SOLAS) and Commonwealth or State government marine legislation • voluntarily equipped with GMDSS radiocommunication installations. It is the recommended textbook for candidates wishing to qualify for the Australian GMDSS General Operator’s Certificate of Proficiency. This handbook replaces the tenth edition of the GMDSS Handbook published in September 2013, and has been amended to reflect: • changes to regulations adopted by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) World Radiocommunications Conference (2015) • changes to Inmarsat services • an updated AMSA distress beacon registration form • changes to various ITU Recommendations • changes to the publications published by the ITU • developments in Man Overboard (MOB) devices • clarification of GMDSS radio log procedures • general editorial updating and improvements. Procedures outlined in the handbook are based on the ITU Radio Regulations, on radio procedures used by Australian Maritime Communications Stations and Satellite Earth Stations in the Inmarsat network. Careful observance of the procedures covered by this handbook is essential for the efficient exchange of communications in the marine radiocommunication service, particularly where safety of life at sea is concerned. Special attention should be given to those sections dealing with distress, urgency, and safety. Operators of radiocommunications equipment on vessels not equipped with GMDSS installations should refer to the Marine Radio Operators Handbook published by the Australian Maritime College, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia. No provision of this handbook or the ITU Radio Regulations prevents the use, by a ship in distress, of any means at its disposal to attract attention, make known its position and obtain help. -
Mnlilslffislßl SIGNAL BOOK UNITED STATES ARMY
Uifh '^r MnlilSlffiSlßl SIGNAL BOOK UNITED STATES ARMY v 1916 WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 NOV 0 8 1988 WAR DEPARTMENT Document No. 500 Office ofthe Chief Sijnal Officer ADDITIONALCOPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE•SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE "WASHINGTON,D. C. AT 20 CENTS PER COPY V War Department, Office of the Chief of Staff. > Washington, April15, 1916. The followingSignal Book, prepared by the Chief Signal Officer of the Army,is approved and herewith issued for the information and government of the Regular Army and the Organized Militia of the United States. It supersedes Signal Book, United States Army, 1914, and its provisions willbe strictly observed throughout the service. order of the Secretary of War: H.L. Scott, Major General, Chief ofStaff. 3 CONTENTS. Page. Part I. General Instructions for Army Signaling 7 11. The American Morse Code 9 111. The International Morse or General Service Code. \u25a0 12 IV. Visual Signaling ingeneral 15 V. Visual Signaling by Flag, Torch, Hand Lan tern, or Beam of Searchlight (without shut ter) 17 VI. Signaling with Heliograph, Flash Lantern, or Searchlight (with shutter) 18 VII.The Ardois System 19 VIII.Signaling by Two-ArmSemaphore . 21 Stationary Semaphore 21 Hand Flags withTwo-ArmSemaphore Code. 21 IX.Letter Codes: Infantry .' 23 Cavalry. 24 Field Artillery ..... 24 Coast Artillery , 26 X. Conventional and Preconcerted Signals with Rockets, Bombs, Small Arms, Guns, Coston Lights, Very Pistols, etc 2828 XI.Flag Signals by Permanent Hoist. 31 XII.Conventional Telephone Signals 33 XIII.Emergency Signals '.. 34 XIV.Additional and Improvised Codes. 38 XV. -
Using Coding to Improve Localization and Backscatter Communication Performance in Low-Power Sensor Networks
Using Coding to Improve Localization and Backscatter Communication Performance in Low-Power Sensor Networks by Itay Cnaan-On Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Duke University Date: Approved: Jeffrey Krolik, Co-supervisor Robert Calderbank, Co-supervisor Matthew Reynolds Henry Pfister Loren Nolte Dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Abstract Using Coding to Improve Localization and Backscatter Communication Performance in Low-Power Sensor Networks by Itay Cnaan-On Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Duke University Date: Approved: Jeffrey Krolik, Co-supervisor Robert Calderbank, Co-supervisor Matthew Reynolds Henry Pfister Loren Nolte An abstract of a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering in the Graduate School of Duke University 2016 Copyright c 2016 by Itay Cnaan-On All rights reserved except the rights granted by the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial Licence Abstract Backscatter communication is an emerging wireless technology that recently has gained an increase in attention from both academic and industry circles. The key innovation of the technology is the ability of ultra-low power devices to utilize nearby existing radio signals to communicate. As there is no need to generate their own ener- getic radio signal, the devices can benefit from a simple design, are very inexpensive and are extremely energy efficient compared with traditional wireless communica- tion. These benefits have made backscatter communication a desirable candidate for distributed wireless sensor network applications with energy constraints. -
Visible Light Communication (VLC), Application Scenarios and Demonstrations in the Various Are Presented in This Document
March 2008 doc.: IEEE 802.15-<08/0114-02> Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Visible Light Communication : Tutorial] Date Submitted: [9 March 2008] Source: [(1)Eun Tae Won, Dongjae Shin, D.K. Jung, Y.J. Oh, Taehan Bae, Hyuk-Choon Kwon, Chihong Cho, Jaeseung Son, (2) Dominic O’Brien (3)Tae-Gyu Kang (4) Tom Matsumura] Company [(1)Samsung Electronics Co.,LTD, (2)University of Oxford, (3)ETRI (4) VLCC (28 Members)] Address [(1)Dong Suwon P.O. Box 105, 416 Maetan-3dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon-si, Gyeonggi-do, 443-742 Korea, (2) Wellington Square, Oxford, OX1 2JD, United Kingdom, (3) 161 Gajeong-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 305-700, Korea] Voice:[(1)82-31-279-5613,(3)82-42-860-5232], FAX: [(1)82-31-279-5130], E-Mail:[(1)[email protected], (2) [email protected], (3)[email protected]] Re: [] Abstract: [The overview of the visible light communication (VLC), application scenarios and demonstrations in the various are presented in this document. The research issues, which should be discussed in the near future, also are presented.] Purpose: [Tutorial to IEEE 802.15] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. -
Morse Code and the Information Age Morse Code, Invented by Samuel F. B. Morse in the 1830S, Is a Method of Transmitting Textual
Morse Code and the Information Age Morse code, invented by Samuel F. B. Morse in the 1830s, is a method of transmitting textual information as a series of on-off tones, lights, or clicks that can be directly understood by a skilled listener or observer without special equipment. The International Morse Code encodes the Roman alphabet, the Arabic numerals and a small set of punctuation and procedural signals. The original telegraph system had an apparatus on the receiving end that spat out a string of paper with indentations on it. Short indentations were called “dots” or “dits,” and the longer ones “dashes” or “dahs.” Because many non-English natural languages use more than the 26 Roman letters, extensions to the Morse alphabet exist for those languages. Morse code has been in use for more than 160 years—longer than any other electrical coding system. What is called Morse code today is actually somewhat different from what was originally developed. The Modern International Morse code, or continental code, was created by Friedrich Clemens Gerke in 1848 and initially used for telegraphy between Hamburg and Cuxhaven in Germany. Gerke changed nearly half of the alphabet and all of the numerals resulting substantially in the modern form of the code. After some minor changes, International Morse Code was standardized at the International Telegraphy Congress in 1865 in Paris, and was later made the standard by the International Telecommunication Union (ITU). Samuel Morse's original code specification, largely limited to use in the United States and Canada, became known as American Morse code or railroad code. -
Morse Code Worksheets Morse Code Facts
Morse Code Worksheets Morse Code Facts Morse code is used to send telegraphic information through two signal durations as dots and dashes that correspond to the alphabet, numbers, and punctuation. It transformed how people communicated with each other across long distances. HISTORY AND DEVELOPMENT ★ Samuel F. B. Morse, along with Leonard Gale and Alfred Vail, was able to develop a telegraph with a single circuit. Using this telegraph, the operator key is pushed down, sending an electrical signal to the receiver through a wire. ★ Around 1837, Morse and Vail developed a code that assigned a set of dots and dashes to the alphabet and numbers based on how often they are used in the English language. Samuel Morse, the inventor of Morse code KIDSKONNECT.COM Morse Code Facts ★ Simple codes were assigned to letters that are frequently used and those that are not used as often had more complex and extended codes. For example, the letter E, which is commonly used, is represented by while the letter Q is . ★ On May 24, 1844, Samuel Morse sent the first Morse telegraph from Washington, D.C., to Baltimore, Maryland. ★ In Samuel Morse's telegraph system, a paper tape is indented with a stylus whenever an electric current is received. Due to its mechanical components, the receiver makes a clicking sound whenever the stylus moves to mark the paper tape. A telegraph sounder (left) and key (right) The operators initially translated the message based on the indentations on the tape but soon they realized they could translate these clicks directly into dots (dits) and dashes (dahs) without the need to look at the paper tape. -
Federal Communications Commission § 80.319
Federal Communications Commission § 80.319 § 80.314 Distress communications. as practicable over a period of approxi- (a) The international radiotelephone mately one minute. The purpose of this distress signal consists of the word special signal is to attract the atten- MAYDAY, pronounced as the French tion of the person on watch or to actu- expression ‘‘m’aider’’. ate automatic devices giving the (b) These distress signals indicate alarm. that a mobile station is threatened by § 80.318 Use of alarm signals. grave and imminent danger and re- quests immediate assistance. (a) The radiotelegraph or radio- (c) The radiotelephone distress call telephone alarm signal, as appropriate, consists of: must only be used to announce: (1) The distress signal MAYDAY spo- (1) That a distress call or message is ken three times; about to follow; (2) The words THIS IS; (2) The transmission of an urgent cy- (3) The call sign (or name, if no call clone warning. In this case the alarm sign assigned) of the mobile station in signal may only be used by coast sta- distress, spoken three times; tions authorized by the Commission to (4) Particulars of the station’s posi- do so; or tion; (3) The loss of a person or persons (5) The nature of the distress; overboard. In this case the alarm sig- (6) The kind of assistance desired; nal may only be used when the assist- and ance of other ships is required and can- (7) Any other information which not be satisfactorily obtained by the might facilitate rescue, for example, use of the urgency signal only, but the the length, color, and type of vessel, or alarm signal must not be repeated by number of persons on board. -
Recreational Craft COVERS Layout 1
Recreational_partB_ch6_11_Layout 1 17/10/2017 17:04 Page 107 Chapter 11 Emergency Procedures 107 Recreational_partB_ch6_11_Layout 1 17/10/2017 17:04 Page 108 11 The procedures described in this Chapter do not prevent the use, by any vessel, survival craft or person in distress of any means at their disposal to attract attention, make known their position and obtain help. 11.1 Procedure for making e.g. “Position one mile South of distress or urgency calls Fastnet Lighthouse”) using VHF voice STATE THE NATURE OF 11.1.1 Making a distress DISTRESS. Emergency Procedures transmission using VHF voice (e.g. sinking, man overboard, fire on broadcasting – MAYDAY board, …) In cases where there is grave or imminent danger to either the vessel STATE THE NUMBER OF or persons on board, then a PERSONS ABOARD. MAYDAY should be broadcast on Channel 16 with the VHF unit set to STATE ANY OTHER USEFUL high power in the following format: INFORMATION. “MAYDAY, MAYDAY, MAYDAY, OVER”. This is ‘NAME OF VESSEL’, 11.1.2 Making an urgency ‘NAME OF VESSEL’, ‘NAME OF broadcast using VHF – VESSEL’ PAN-PAN (State the name of the vessel three In circumstances that are times) considered to be grave but do not require immediate assistance and MAYDAY, where there is no imminent danger to the vessel or persons on board, ‘NAME OF VESSEL’, e.g. mechanical failure, loss of propulsion, a “PAN-PAN” Urgency STATE THE POSITION OF THE Broadcast should be made on VHF VESSEL Channel 16 with the unit set to high (If possible give the position from a power in the following format: GPS receiver or bearings from and distance to any known fixed points 108 Recreational_partB_ch6_11_Layout 1 17/10/2017 17:04 Page 109 11 “PAN-PAN, PAN-PAN, PAN-PAN, Modern VHF radios are fitted with a Emergency Procedures Digital Selective Calling (DSC) ALL STATIONS, ALL STATIONS, facility whereby a distress call is ALL STATIONS, activated by pressing a dedicated switch on the radio. -
Q Code & Signals
Rec. ITU-R M.1172 1 RECOMMENDATION ITU-R M.1172* MISCELLANEOUS ABBREVIATIONS AND SIGNALS TO BE USED FOR RADIOCOMMUNICATIONS IN THE MARITIME MOBILE SERVICE (1995) Rec. ITU-R M.1172 The ITU Radiocommunication Assembly, considering a) that there is a need to describe miscellaneous abbreviations and signals to be used in the maritime mobile service, recommends 1 that the use of miscellaneous abbreviations and signals for radiocommunications in the maritime mobile service be in accordance with Annex 1. ANNEX 1 Miscellaneous abbreviations and signals to be used for radiocommunications in the maritime mobile service Section I. Q Code Introduction 1 The series of groups listed in this Annex range from QOA to QUZ. 2 The QOA to QQZ series are reserved for the maritime mobile service. 3 Certain Q code abbreviations may be given an affirmative or negative sense by sending, immediately following the abbreviation, the letter C or the letters NO (in radiotelephony spoken as: CHARLIE or NO). 4 The meanings assigned to Q code abbreviations may be amplified or completed by the appropriate addition of other groups, call signs, place names, figures, numbers, etc. It is optional to fill in the blanks shown in parentheses. Any data which are filled in where blanks appear shall be sent in the same order as shown in the text of the following tables. 5 Q code abbreviations are given the form of a question when followed by a question mark in radiotelegraphy and RQ (ROMEO QUEBEC) in radiotelephony. When an abbreviation is used as a question and is followed by additional or complementary information, the question mark (or RQ) should follow this information. -
Hadamard Coded Modulation for Visible Light Communication
Hadamard Coded Modulation for Visible Light Communication Surendra Shrestha Journal of Nepal Physical Society Volume 4, Issue 1, February 2017 ISSN: 2392-473X Editors: Dr. Gopi Chandra Kaphle Dr. Devendra Adhikari Mr. Deependra Parajuli JNPS, 4 (1), 93-96 (2017) Published by: Nepal Physical Society P.O. Box : 2934 Tri-Chandra Campus Kathmandu, Nepal Email: [email protected] JNPS 4 (1), 93-96 (2017) © Nepal Physical Society ISSN: 2392-473X Research Article Hadamard Coded Modulation for Visible Light Communication Surendra Shrestha Department of Electronics and Computer Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, Institute of Engineering, T. U., Lalitpur, Nepal Corresponding Email: [email protected] ABSTRACT In the recent days, Visible Light Communication (VLC), a novel technology that enables standard Light- Emitting-Diodes (LEDs) to transmit data, is gaining significant attention. However, to date, there is very little research on its deployment. The enormous and growing user demand for wireless data is placing huge pressure on existing Wi-Fi technology, which uses the radio and microwave frequency spectrum. Also the radio and microwave frequency spectrum is heavily used and overcrowded. On the other hand, visible light spectrum has huge, unused and unregulated capacity for communications (about 10,000 times greater bandwidth compared to radio spectrum). Li-Fi, the wireless technology based on VLC, is successfully tested with very high speed in lab and also implemented commercially. In the near future, this technology could enable devices containing LEDs, such as car lights, city lights, screens and home appliances, to form their own networks for high speed, secure communication. In this paper the performance analysis of Hadamard Coded Modulation (HCM) for Visible Light Communication (VLC) is carried out.