Appendix 3: Category 1 Specimens Determination and Present Location

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Appendix 3: Category 1 Specimens Determination and Present Location Appendix 3: Category 1 specimens determination and present location. Record Specific ID Description Present location number 1 Insect in woodstone, may show soft part preservation 3 Partial insect 2 wings and head with eyes. 4 Maybe new species. Complete apart from tail, skin very well Sold to Chris McGowan for the Royal preserved in places Ontario Museum, Canada. 5 Insect No information No information 6 Angulaticeras Not found on this coast before? 9.8cm Diam. Involute, Cardiff Museum via Martin Foster dumortieri (Fucini) compressed, rapidly increasing whorls, narrow tabulate venter collection 17 Hybodus? Dis-articulated partial remains of skull With Chris Moore 25 Multiple starfish in block, two species brittlestars and cushion stars with Chris Moore 26 Luidia murchisoni? with Chris Moore 27 Temnodontosaurus Large and well preserved skull On display at 'Charmouth Fossils' shop 33 3D skull, 30cm and a paddle Sold 34 Scelidosaurus One of the most complete specimens ever found. 14ft long Specimen is on offer for display with the World Heritage Team. Location still to be determined 37 Bison priscus 39 Phricodoceras Rare and large specimen (28 to 40cm) lanellosum 43 Antler with cut marks On loan to CHCC 51 Scelidosaurus 52 Scelidosaurus Part of back foot of Scelidosaurus Record 34 Now with the rest of the skeleton. David Sole collection 56 Scelidosaurus Three further pieces of Scelidosaurus, specimen 34 Record Specific ID Description Present location number 58 Complex markings left on surface after removal of the wood (which were probably imprinted from the surface of the wood). Black Ven/Spittles 65 Mixed collection of 34 specimens from a number of years. At least Donated to the NHM 2 Cat 1 specimens, one a new species identified by Dr Andrew Ross from the Natural History Museum 67 Grasshopper To be retained by collector 75 Leptonectes? Articulated ichthyosaur (skull and abdomen) Donated o the NHM 76 Ichthyosaurus Stomach contents and possible skin communis 79 Ichthyosaurus Articulated skeleton Sold to another private collector after breviceps having been offered to a museum for the required 6 month period. 86 Insect Wing Fossil insect, possible wing. Also unusual plant material in matrix Mike's Minerals, 7 Drakes way, Lyme Regis, Dorset DT7 3QP 92 Beetle Complete beetle With collector 93 23 Fossil Insects with collector 94 Well preserved bones in 8inch long stone found loose on beach Amateur collector swapped the specimen where big one found. for another; this is now with the main find. 99 Front half skull, paddle, ribs, vert, slightly disarticulated With collector 101 Lobster Well preserved Lobster claw With collector 102 Dragonfly Wing and counterpart. VERY clear. Identified as possible new sp. With collector By Andrew Ross, NHM 123 Large Sponge preserved in Chert Retained by collector (for now) 132 Eugnathus type Large almost complete fish. (approx 80cm). Well preserved. With finder Record Specific ID Description Present location number 133 5cm leaf with good veins visible With collector. Available for donation 134 Large skull in nodule and part of rostrum, also some vertebrae and With collector ribs. Appears to have a very short snout. 136 Complete plesiosaur in limestone - to be prepped. With collector but possibly available to museum for sale or donation 141 Coccolepis sp very rare species, complete with finder 165 Paleospinax Soft part preservation, scales and body outline (most of fins worn With collector, future donation to a away by tide) relevant museum 184 Plant Possible impression of a leaf in a pyrite nodule With collector 187 Scelidosaurus Several disarticulated bones (including osteoderms) in a nodule With collector 190 Eryonid lobster Perfect preservation in shale. 80% complete due to sea damage With collector 192 Scelidosaurus Loose and nodulised ribs, scutes, vertebrae and partial limb bones With collector 195 Eryonid lobster Two lobsters and one moult With collector 196 Lobster Almost complete specimen Donated to the NHM Summary – 43 total records. Minus 4 records relating to record 34 (51, 52, 56 and 94), minus 1 found on Monmouth Beach (record 136) minus 1 further record relating to a single specimen linked to record 87 (record 192) = 37 specimens .
Recommended publications
  • Way to Breathe
    INSIGHT DINOSAURS A new, ‘hip’ way to breathe Ornithischians, one of the three major groups of dinosaurs, developed a unique mechanism to ensure airflow in the lungs. MARC R SPENCER the liver to create a motion that draws in air into Related research article Radermacher VJ, the lung. Fernandez V, Schachner ER, Butler RJ, Amongst dinosaurs, two groups (one extinct, Bordy EM, Hudgins MN, de Klerk WJ, the other which gave rise to birds) feature early Chapelle KEJ, Choiniere JN. 2021. A new species with gastralia, only to lose these bones Heterodontosaurus specimen elucidates in favor of other ventilatory mechanisms later in the unique ventilatory macroevolution of evolution (Claessens, 2004). On the other hand, ornithischian dinosaurs. eLife 10:e66036. gastralia had never been found in species doi: 10.7554/eLife.66036 belonging to the now-extinct third dinosaur group Ornithischia, which later on included spe- cies such as Triceratops and Stegosaurus. Now, in eLife, Viktor Radermacher and colleagues report having found, for the first time, gastralia reathe in... and out. As your chest rises in Ornithischia (Radermacher et al., 2021). The and falls, the diaphragm and several team, which is based in institutions in Canada, B lesser-known muscles create the reassur- South Africa, the United Kingdom, France and ing bellows-like motion that allows air to fill and the United States, spotted the bones in Hetero- leave the lungs (Perry et al., 2010). All living dontosaurus, one of the oldest-known mammals and many extinct relatives share the ornithischians. same respiratory muscles and ‘ventilation’ tech- Beyond the unique presence of these bones, this new Heterodontosaurus specimen from nique, but this is not the only way to breathe.
    [Show full text]
  • And the Origin and Evolution of the Ankylosaur Pelvis
    Pelvis of Gargoyleosaurus (Dinosauria: Ankylosauria) and the Origin and Evolution of the Ankylosaur Pelvis Kenneth Carpenter1,2*, Tony DiCroce3, Billy Kinneer3, Robert Simon4 1 Prehistoric Museum, Utah State University – Eastern, Price, Utah, United States of America, 2 Geology Section, University of Colorado Museum, Boulder, Colorado, United States of America, 3 Denver Museum of Nature and Science, Denver, Colorado, United States of America, 4 Dinosaur Safaris Inc., Ashland, Virginia, United States of America Abstract Discovery of a pelvis attributed to the Late Jurassic armor-plated dinosaur Gargoyleosaurus sheds new light on the origin of the peculiar non-vertical, broad, flaring pelvis of ankylosaurs. It further substantiates separation of the two ankylosaurs from the Morrison Formation of the western United States, Gargoyleosaurus and Mymoorapelta. Although horizontally oriented and lacking the medial curve of the preacetabular process seen in Mymoorapelta, the new ilium shows little of the lateral flaring seen in the pelvis of Cretaceous ankylosaurs. Comparison with the basal thyreophoran Scelidosaurus demonstrates that the ilium in ankylosaurs did not develop entirely by lateral rotation as is commonly believed. Rather, the preacetabular process rotated medially and ventrally and the postacetabular process rotated in opposition, i.e., lateral and ventrally. Thus, the dorsal surfaces of the preacetabular and postacetabular processes are not homologous. In contrast, a series of juvenile Stegosaurus ilia show that the postacetabular process rotated dorsally ontogenetically. Thus, the pelvis of the two major types of Thyreophora most likely developed independently. Examination of other ornithischians show that a non-vertical ilium had developed independently in several different lineages, including ceratopsids, pachycephalosaurs, and iguanodonts.
    [Show full text]
  • Two New Stegosaur Specimens from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA
    Editors' choice Two new stegosaur specimens from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA D. CARY WOODRUFF, DAVID TREXLER, and SUSANNAH C.R. MAIDMENT Woodruff, D.C., Trexler, D., and Maidment, S.C.R. 2019. Two new stegosaur specimens from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Montana, USA. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 64 (3): 461–480. Two partial skeletons from Montana represent the northernmost occurrences of Stegosauria within North America. One of these specimens represents the northernmost dinosaur fossil ever recovered from the Morrison Formation. Consisting of fragmentary cranial and postcranial remains, these specimens are contributing to our knowledge of the record and distribution of dinosaurs within the Morrison Formation from Montana. While the stegosaurs of the Morrison Formation consist of Alcovasaurus, Hesperosaurus, and Stegosaurus, the only positively identified stegosaur from Montana thus far is Hesperosaurus. Unfortunately, neither of these new specimens exhibit diagnostic autapomorphies. Nonetheless, these specimens are important data points due to their geographic significance, and some aspects of their morphologies are striking. In one specimen, the teeth express a high degree of wear usually unobserved within this clade—potentially illuminating the progression of the chewing motion in derived stegosaurs. Other morphologies, though not histologically examined in this analysis, have the potential to be important indicators for maturational inferences. In suite with other specimens from the northern extent of the formation, these specimens contribute to the ongoing discussion that body size may be latitudinally significant for stegosaurs—an intriguing geographical hypothesis which further emphasizes that size is not an undeviating proxy for maturity in dinosaurs. Key words: Dinosauria, Thyreophora, Stegosauria, Jurassic, Morrison Formation, USA, Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Stegosaurus Scelidosaurus Huayangosaurus Cheeks: No
    Huayangosaurus Scelidosaurus Stegosaurus Cheeks: No reptile has ever had a ‘buccinator’ muscle Answer: highly flexible tongue Brains 0.001% of stegosaur body weight Compared to 1.8% in humans (1000x larger per unit body weight!) Brains Brains Locomotion Graviportal Locomotion Elephantine hind feet (weight-bearing) Shin bones fused with astragalus/ calcaneum Femur: Long compared to humerus Columnar Facultative Tripodality? Stocky forelimbs- could be used for turning/posturing (Bakker) Dermal Armour? Pattern of plates and spines is species-specific Plates paired or staggered (Stegosaurus) Plates were probably not for defense... not tough enough Rotation? Surface markings => symmetrical. Rotation unlikely Potential uses: Thermoregulation? Warm up (ectotherms), Cool down (endotherms) Signaling? positioned for maximal lateral visibility Sexual Selection Mate Recognition Grooves for blood vessels Sexual dimorphism Differences between males and females of the same species **New finding** published in 2015 Stegosaurus Morrison formation, Colorado Dinosaur Sex Figuring out how Stegosaurus even could have mated is a prickly subject. Females were just as well-armored as males, and it is unlikely that males mounted the females from the back. A different technique was necessary. Perhaps they angled so that they faced belly to belly, some have guessed, or maybe, as suggested by Timothy Isles in a recent paper, males faced away from standing females and backed up (a rather tricky maneuver!). The simplest technique yet proposed is that the female lay down on her side and the male approached standing up, thereby avoiding all those plates and spikes. However the Stegosaurus pair accomplished the feat, though, it was most likely brief—only as long as was needed for the exchange of genetic material.
    [Show full text]
  • The Systematic Position of the Enigmatic Thyreophoran Dinosaur Paranthodon Africanus, and the Use of Basal Exemplifiers in Phyl
    1 The systematic position of the enigmatic thyreophoran dinosaur Paranthodon africanus, 2 and the use of basal exemplifiers in phylogenetic analysis 3 4 Thomas J. Raven1,2 ,3 and Susannah C. R. Maidment2 ,3 5 61Department of Earth Science & Engineering, Imperial College London, UK 72School of Environment & Technology, University of Brighton, UK 8 3Department of Earth Sciences, Natural History Museum, London, UK 9 10Corresponding author: Thomas J. Raven 11 12Email address: [email protected] 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21ABSTRACT 22 23The first African dinosaur to be discovered, Paranthodon africanus was found in 1845 in the 24Lower Cretaceous of South Africa. Taxonomically assigned to numerous groups since discovery, 25in 1981 it was described as a stegosaur, a group of armoured ornithischian dinosaurs 26characterised by bizarre plates and spines extending from the neck to the tail. This assignment 27that has been subsequently accepted. The type material consists of a premaxilla, maxilla, a nasal, 28and a vertebra, and contains no synapomorphies of Stegosauria. Several features of the maxilla 29and dentition are reminiscent of Ankylosauria, the sister-taxon to Stegosauria, and the premaxilla 30appears superficially similar to that of some ornithopods. The vertebral material has never been 31described, and since the last description of the specimen, there have been numerous discoveries 32of thyreophoran material potentially pertinent to establishing the taxonomic assignment of the 33specimen. An investigation of the taxonomic and systematic position of Paranthodon is therefore 34warranted. This study provides a detailed re-description, including the first description of the 35vertebra. Numerous phylogenetic analyses demonstrate that the systematic position of 36Paranthodon is highly labile and subject to change depending on which exemplifier for the clade 37Stegosauria is used.
    [Show full text]
  • Dinosauria: Ornithischia
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository of the Academy's Library Diversity and convergences in the evolution of feeding adaptations in ankylosaurs Törölt: Diversity of feeding characters explains evolutionary success of ankylosaurs (Dinosauria: Ornithischia)¶ (Dinosauria: Ornithischia) Formázott: Betűtípus: Félkövér Formázott: Betűtípus: Félkövér Formázott: Betűtípus: Félkövér Attila Ősi1, 2*, Edina Prondvai2, 3, Jordan Mallon4, Emese Réka Bodor5 Formázott: Betűtípus: Félkövér 1Department of Paleontology, Eötvös University, Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, 1117, Hungary; +36 30 374 87 63; [email protected] 2MTA-ELTE Lendület Dinosaur Research Group, Budapest, Pázmány Péter sétány 1/c, 1117, Hungary; +36 70 945 51 91; [email protected] 3University of Gent, Evolutionary Morphology of Vertebrates Research Group, K.L. Ledegankstraat 35, Gent, Belgium; +32 471 990733; [email protected] 4Palaeobiology, Canadian Museum of Nature, PO Box 3443, Station D, Ottawa, Ontario, K1P 6P4, Canada; +1 613 364 4094; [email protected] 5Geological and Geophysical Institute of Hungary, Budapest, Stefánia út 14, 1143, Hungary; +36 70 948 0248; [email protected] Research was conducted at the Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary. *Corresponding author: Attila Ősi, [email protected] Acknowledgements This work was supported by the MTA–ELTE Lendület Programme (Grant No. LP 95102), OTKA (Grant No. T 38045, PD 73021, NF 84193, K 116665), National Geographic Society (Grant No. 7228–02, 7508–03), Bakonyi Bauxitbánya Ltd, Geovolán Ltd, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Canadian Museum of Nature, The Jurassic Foundation, Hantken Miksa Foundation, Eötvös Loránd University. Disclosure statment: All authors declare that there is no financial interest or benefit arising from the direct application of this research.
    [Show full text]
  • Armored Dinosaurs of the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia Family Ankylosauridae E.A
    translated by Robert Welch and Kenneth Carpenter [Trudy Paleontol. Inst., Akademiia nauk SSSR 62: 51-91] Armored Dinosaurs of the Upper Cretaceous of Mongolia Family Ankylosauridae E.A. Maleev Contents I. Brief historical outline of Ankylosauur research ........................................................................52 II. Systematics section ....................................................................................................................53 Suborder: Ankylosauria Family: Ankylosauridae Brown, 1908 Genus: Talarurus Maleev, 1952 ................................................................54 Talarurus plicatospineus Maleev .................................................56 Genus: Dyoplosaurus Parks, 1924 .............................................................78 Dyoplosaurus giganteus sp. nov. ..................................................79 III. On some features of Ankylosaur skeletal structure ..................................................................85 IV. Manner of life and reconstruction of external appearance of Talarurus .................................87 V. Phylogenetic remarks and stratigraphic distribution of Mongolian Ankylosaurs .....................89 Bibliography ...................................................................................................................................91 The paleontological expedition of the Academy of Sciences of the USSR in 1948-1949 discovered and investigated a series of sites of armored dinosaurs in the territory of the Mongolian
    [Show full text]
  • Reconsidering the Status and Affinities of the Ornithischian Dinosaur Tatisaurus Oehleri Simmons, 1965
    Blackwell Publishing LtdOxford, UKZOJZoological Journal of the Linnean Society0024-4082© 2007 The Linnean Society of London? 2007 View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk 150? brought to you by CORE 865874 Original Article provided by ESC Publications - Cambridge Univesity TATISAURUS RECONSIDEREDD. B. NORMAN Et al. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2007, 150, 865–874. With 2 figures Reconsidering the status and affinities of the ornithischian dinosaur Tatisaurus oehleri Simmons, 1965 DAVID B. NORMAN1*, RICHARD J. BUTLER1,2 and SUSANNAH C. R. MAIDMENT1 1Sedgwick Museum, Department of Earth Sciences, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, UK 2Department of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD, UK Received April 2006; accepted for publication December 2006 The early Mesozoic fossil fauna collected from the Lower Lufeng Formation of Yunnan Province, China, has attracted considerable interest and attention since its discovery in the late 1930s. Its importance reflected a combination of its comparatively remote geographical position and, more particularly, the similarities of its fauna compared with approximately contemporary discoveries from Europe, North and South America, and southern Africa. The frag- mentary and poorly preserved Lufeng ornithischian dinosaur Tatisaurus oehleri was described in 1965 and proved taxonomically and systematically enigmatic from the start. Originally assigned, with some noted ambivalence, to the basal (‘primitive’) group of ornithischians known as hypsilophodontids, since 1965 Tatisaurus has been variously ignored, assigned to a more rigorously defined Hypsilophodontidae, referred to both of the armoured (thyreophoran) ornithischian dinosaur clades (Stegosauria and Ankylosauria), or referred to a more basal position within the thyreophoran lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Phylogeny of Stegosauria (Dinosauria, Ornithischia)
    Raven, T. J. and Maidment, S. C. R. In press. Palaeontology A new phylogeny of Stegosauria (Dinosauria, Ornithischia) THOMAS J. RAVEN1 AND SUSANNAH C. R. MAIDMENT2* 1Department of Earth Science and Engineering, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom, [email protected]; 2School of Environment and Technology, University of Brighton, Lewes Road, Brighton BN2 4GJ, United Kingdom, [email protected] * Corresponding author 1 Raven, T. J. and Maidment, S. C. R. In press. Palaeontology ABSTRACT The stegosaurs are some of the most easily recognisable dinosaurs, but they are surprisingly rare as fossils. Consequently much remains unknown about their palaeobiology, and every new stegosaurian find contributes to understanding the evolution of the clade. Since the last attempt to examine the evolutionary relationships of Stegosauria, new specimens have come to light, including the most complete individual of Stegosaurus ever found, new taxa have been described and, perhaps most importantly, new methods for analysis of cladistic datasets have been produced. In the light of these new data and technological advances, the phylogenetic relationships of the stegosaurs and basal armoured dinosaurs are investigated. The inclusion of continuous data results in much better resolution than was previously obtained, and the resulting single most parsimonious tree supports re-erection of the genera Miragaia and Hesperosaurus, which had previously been synonymized with Dacentrurus and Stegosaurus respectively. The recently described genus Alcovasaurus is resolved as a basal thyreophoran, but this is likely to be due to a combination of a very high degree of missing data and the questionable ontogenetic stage of the specimen.
    [Show full text]
  • Palaeontologia Electronica Defense Capabilities of Kentrosaurus
    Palaeontologia Electronica http://palaeo-electronica.org Defense capabilities of Kentrosaurus aethiopicus Hennig, 1915 Heinrich Mallison ABSTRACT Stegosaurs were not built for rapid locomotion. Instead of fleeing from predators, they probably used their spiked tails as ‘thagomizers’ for defense. Kinetic/dynamic modeling in a computer-aided engineering program allows either using prescribed joint motions to determine joint forces or torque input models that deliver accelerations and moment of inertia of the tail tip spikes. Prescribed motion models based on a CAD range of motion analysis of Kentrosaurus and motions observed in extant long-tailed reptiles give results consistent with those of models using torque values calculated from detailed CAD reconstruction of muscle cross sections and moment arms. Both indicate that the tail of Kentrosaurus was a dangerous weapon, capable of inflicting painful slashing injuries and debilitating penetrating trauma, even on large theropods, across a large portion of its motion range. Continuous rapid motion was at least suffi- cient for the spikes to slash open the integument or penetrate soft tissues and fracture ribs or facial bones, while aimed whiplash blows may have had sufficient energy to fracture sturdy longbones. Heinrich Mallison. Museum für Naturkunde - Leibniz Institute for Research on Evolution and Biodiversity at the Humboldt University Berlin, Berlin, Germany. [email protected] KEYWORDS: biomechanics; kinetic/dynamic modeling; stegosaur; defense behavior INTRODUCTION rare occurrences. Of a sample of 51 stegosaur spikes from the Morrison Formation of North Amer- It has long been theorized that armored dino- ica, about 10% showed broken tips (McWhinney et saurs, especially stegosaurs, used their tails for al.
    [Show full text]
  • New Teeth of Nodosaurid Ankylosaurs from the Lower Cretaceous of Southern England
    New teeth of nodosaurid ankylosaurs from the Lower Cretaceous of Southern England WILLIAM T. BLOWS and KERRI HONEYSETT Blows, W.T. and Honeysett, K. 2014. New teeth of nodosaurid ankylosaurs from the Lower Cretaceous of Southern England. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 59 (4): 835–841. We present new nodosaurid teeth from the Valanginian of Bexhill, Sussex and the Barremian of the Isle of Wight, the first from the Lower Cretaceous of the United Kingdom. Teeth found during the mid-1800s from the Valanginian and ascribed to the nodosaurid Hylaeosaurus are probably from sauropod dinosaurs. The Isle of Wight tooth could possibly be referred to Polacanthus foxii, the teeth of which are unknown. These new English nodosaurid teeth are similar to those of North American and European Jurassic to Late Cretaceous nodosaurids, especially the American Gastonia, Texasetes, Mymoorapelta, Gargoyleosaurus, and the European Hungarosaurus. Key words: Dinosauria, Nodosauridae, Polacanthus, ankylosaur, Valanginian, Barremian, Cretaceous, England. William T. Blows [[email protected]], School of Health Sciences, City University, London, EC1A 7QN, UK; Kerri Honeysett [[email protected]], 10 Camperdown Street, Bexhill on Sea, East Sussex, TN39 5BE, UK. Received 8 November 2012, accepted 11 March 2013, available online 13 March 2013. Copyright © 2014 W.T. Blows and K. Honeysett. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. 1993). Isolated teeth from the same strata as Hylaeosaurus Introduction (NHMUK 2310, NHMUK 3326, NHMUK R739, BMBG 004179, BMBG 013516) were tentatively assigned to There are few skull and tooth remains of armoured dinosaurs Hy- by Mantell (1841) and Owen (1857).
    [Show full text]
  • Teacher Guide
    7 Dec 2018 - 5 May 2019 Teacher Guide Public Programs and Learning Contents Introduction 1 Exhibition Teacher Guide Overview 2 Relevant background information about dinosaurs 2 Dinosaurs featured in the exhibition 3 Organisation of this teacher guide 4 Throughlines 5 Before the Exhibition 6 Pre-exhibition learning activities 6 At the Exhibition 10 Exhibition learning activities 10 After the Exhibition 11 Post-exhibition learning activities 11 Resources for Inquiry 12 Acknowledgements TMAG thanks David Boon, Department of Education, Tasmania for his significant and valuable contribution to this guide. TMAG acknowledge the support of Gondwana Studios for the exhibition and also the use of some of their materials in this learning resource. ©Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery 2018 All imagery, unless indicated owned by the Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery. Disclaimer TMAG does not accept any responsibility for the accuracy or availability of any information or services on websites listed in this guide. Please note the TMAG exhibition may differ from the photographic images shown in this guide. Presenting partners Major partner Education partner Exhibition partner Media partners Cover image: Kosmoceratops and Triceratops by Luis V. Rey Introduction Today we know a lot about dinosaurs, but there is still plenty we do not know that poses outstanding questions. For example, we know that dinosaurs are not all big and that they are not all extinct, but how do we Notes: know what dinosaurs looked like? How have recent discoveries not only The exhibition activities are provided more information on what dinosaurs actually looked like, but based around a class spending also provided evidence of the evolutionary link between one group of an hour in the exhibition (four dinosaurs and modern birds? galleries).
    [Show full text]