DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) Report 2016 Environmental and Social Assessment (ESA) Report Harnessing Agribusiness Opportunities through Robust and Vibrant Entrepreneurship Supportive of Peaceful Transformation (HARVEST) (FINAL DRAFT) The views expressed in this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the World Bank (WB), Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP). The WB, JICA, FAO and LBP do not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accept no responsibility for any consequence of their use. Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP) Through the assistance of World Bank, JICA and FAO ESA for the Proposed Harnessing Agribusiness Opportunities through Robust and Vibrant Entrepreneurship Supportive of Peaceful Transformation (HARVEST) 2 Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..............................................................................6 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................8 I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 16 1. The Proposed Program on Economic Growth through Agribusiness Cooperation and Entrepreneurship .................................................................................................... 16 1.1 Background ............................................................................................ 16 1.2 Project Description ................................................................................. 17 1.3 Project Location ..................................................................................... 19 2. Legal and Institutional Framework .................................................................... 20 2.1 Environmental and social laws and policies ............................................ 20 2.2 Existing institutional and governance structures ..................................... 22 II. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL ASSESSMENT (ESA) ..................................... 25 1. ESA objectives .................................................................................................. 25 2. ESA methods and scope of work ...................................................................... 25 III. ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL CONTEXT: BASELINE SETTING ................... 27 1. Geographic or Physical Context ........................................................................ 27 2. The Natural Environment Context ..................................................................... 28 2.1 Geology .................................................................................................. 28 2.2 Soils and minerals .................................................................................. 30 2.3 Climate ................................................................................................... 33 2.4 Air Quality .............................................................................................. 34 2.5 Water ..................................................................................................... 34 2.6 Biodiversity ............................................................................................. 38 2.7 Terrestrial Biota/Habitat .......................................................................... 41 2.8 Freshwater Biota/Habitat ........................................................................ 44 2.9 Marine Biota/Habitat ............................................................................... 47 3. Demographic and Tri-People Context ............................................................... 50 4. Land Tenure Context ........................................................................................ 51 5. Economic and Poverty Context ......................................................................... 56 6. Political-Economy Context ................................................................................ 63 7. Health Situation ................................................................................................ 64 8. Archaeological and Cultural Resources ............................................................ 65 9. Conflict Context ................................................................................................ 65 10. ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ...................................... 71 A. Upstream Environmental Risk ........................................................................... 71 ESA for the Proposed Harnessing Agribusiness Opportunities through Robust and Vibrant Entrepreneurship Supportive of Peaceful Transformation (HARVEST) 3 Forest/Land Conversion and Loss of Natural Habitats and Biodiversity ............ 71 Overfishing and Loss of Marine Resources ...................................................... 72 Soil Degradation and Erosion ........................................................................... 73 Lower Water Availability ................................................................................... 75 Water Pollution (Area source from fertilizers and agrochemicals) ..................... 75 Waste Management ......................................................................................... 76 Health Impacts from Exposure to Pollution ....................................................... 77 B. Downstream Environmental Risk ...................................................................... 77 Pollution ........................................................................................................... 77 Waste Management ......................................................................................... 78 C. Environmental Risk of Agribusiness Supporting Facilities ................................. 78 51. SOCIAL RISKS AND POTENTIAL IMPACTS ....................................................... 80 A. Risks and Potential Negative Impacts ............................................................... 80 Displacement of Indigenous People.................................................................. 80 Involuntary Resettlement .................................................................................. 81 Increase in Land Conflict .................................................................................. 82 Insignificant Economic Improvement due to Low Wage Rate and Land Rent ... 82 Less Participation and Benefit of Women in Agri-business ............................... 82 Further disempowerment of the poor if with No Effective System for Receiving and Redressing Grievances from the Communities .............................................. 83 B. Positive Impact ................................................................................................. 83 Generated Jobs and Increased Economic Opportunities in Poor Communities 83 Restored Productivity of Lands Abandoned because of Armed Conflicts .......... 83 Enhanced confidence in farming due to improved farming technology and sure market 84 Added Social Services Provided to Host Communities ..................................... 84 76. RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................................................................... 85 A. Environmental Safeguards ................................................................................ 85 B. Social Safeguards ............................................................................................. 87 Indigenous Peoples Policy Framework ............................................................. 87 Resettlement Policy Framework ....................................................................... 88 Grievance Redress and Social Accountability System ...................................... 88 Gender Mainstreaming Framework ................................................................... 89 General Social Management Framework: Other Recommendations ................. 90 Annex A. List of Indigenous Peoples and their Locations in ARMM Annex B. List of ARMM Natural Tourist Spots ESA for the Proposed Harnessing Agribusiness Opportunities through Robust and Vibrant Entrepreneurship Supportive of Peaceful Transformation (HARVEST) 4 Tables and Figures Table Page I-1 Triggered Safeguard Policies 19 I-2 Environmental and Social Policies of GOP, WB and JICA relevant to 20 HARVEST I-3 Implementation Structures of Environmental and Social Policies 22 III-1 Indicative List of Clan Landholdings in Maguindanao 34 III-2 Land Acquisition and Distribution Accomplishment of DAR as of December 34 2014 III-3 Crops Planted in Lands Subjected to Agrarian Reform 35 III-4 ARCs, Land Areas and Beneficiaries of Agrarian Reform as of June 30, 35 2014 III-5 List of Ancestral Domain Claims in Maguindanao 36 III-6 Reported Mineral Deposits in ARMM 39 III-7 Soil Types in ARMM 40 III-8 Suitability of Soils for Agriculture in ARMM 41 III-9 Climate in the ARMM Area 45 III-10 Groundwater Availability 48 III-11 Watershed Areas in ARMM 49 III-12 Percentage of Population with Access to Water Served 49 III-13 KBA and Candidate KBAs in ARMM 52 III-14 Threatened Species Present Globally at only one KBA 53 III-15 Conservation Priority Areas in ARMM 53 III-16 Restricted Range Bird Species in ARMM Endemic Bird Areas 54 III-17 Status of Land Classification in ARMM (2013) 56 III-18 Forest Cover in ARMM (2013) 56 III-19 Watershed Forest Reserve in ARMM (2013) 57 III-20 Forest Agreements in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • POPCEN Report No. 3.Pdf
    CITATION: Philippine Statistics Authority, 2015 Census of Population, Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density ISSN 0117-1453 ISSN 0117-1453 REPORT NO. 3 22001155 CCeennssuuss ooff PPooppuullaattiioonn PPooppuullaattiioonn,, LLaanndd AArreeaa,, aanndd PPooppuullaattiioonn DDeennssiittyy Republic of the Philippines Philippine Statistics Authority Quezon City REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES HIS EXCELLENCY PRESIDENT RODRIGO R. DUTERTE PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY BOARD Honorable Ernesto M. Pernia Chairperson PHILIPPINE STATISTICS AUTHORITY Lisa Grace S. Bersales, Ph.D. National Statistician Josie B. Perez Deputy National Statistician Censuses and Technical Coordination Office Minerva Eloisa P. Esquivias Assistant National Statistician National Censuses Service ISSN 0117-1453 FOREWORD The Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA) conducted the 2015 Census of Population (POPCEN 2015) in August 2015 primarily to update the country’s population and its demographic characteristics, such as the size, composition, and geographic distribution. Report No. 3 – Population, Land Area, and Population Density is among the series of publications that present the results of the POPCEN 2015. This publication provides information on the population size, land area, and population density by region, province, highly urbanized city, and city/municipality based on the data from population census conducted by the PSA in the years 2000, 2010, and 2015; and data on land area by city/municipality as of December 2013 that was provided by the Land Management Bureau (LMB) of the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR). Also presented in this report is the percent change in the population density over the three census years. The population density shows the relationship of the population to the size of land where the population resides.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts and Responses in the Philippines: Water Resources
    CLIMATE RESEARCH Vol. 12: 77–84, 1999 Published August 27 Clim Res Climate change impacts and responses in the Philippines: water resources Aida M. Jose, Nathaniel A. Cruz* Climatology and Agrometeorology Branch (CAB), Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA), 1424 Quezon Ave., Quezon City, Philippines ABSTRACT: The Philippines, like many of the world’s poor countries, will be among the most vulnera- ble to the impacts of climate change because of its limited resources. As shown by previous studies, occurrences of extreme climatic events like droughts and floods have serious negative implications for major water reservoirs in the country. A preliminary and limited assessment of the country’s water resources was undertaken through the application of general circulation model (GCM) results and cli- mate change scenarios that incorporate incremental changes in temperature and rainfall and the use of a hydrological model to simulate the future runoff-rainfall relationship. Results showed that changes in rainfall and temperature in the future will be critical to future inflow in the Angat reservoir and Lake Lanao, with rainfall variability having a greater impact than temperature variability. In the Angat reser- voir, runoff is likely to decrease in the future and be insufficient to meet future demands for water. Lake Lanao is also expected to have a decrease in runoff in the future. With the expected vulnerability of the country’s water resources to global warming, possible measures to cope with future problems facing the country’s water resources are identified. KEY WORDS: Water resources · GCMs · CCCM · UKMO · GFDL · WatBal · Angat reservoir · Lake Lanao 1.
    [Show full text]
  • DEPARTMENT of SCIENCE and TECHNOLOGY Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA)
    Republic of the Philippines DEPARTMENT OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA) TERMS OF REFERENCE for the SUPPLY, DELIVERY, INSTALLATION, COMISSIONING, TESTING AND TRAINING OF HYDRO-METEOROLOGICAL RAINFALL AND WATER LEVEL TELEMETRY MONITORING SYSTEM EQUIPMENT FOR THE AGUS, MANDULOG AND ILIGAN RIVER FLOOD FORECASTING AND WARNING SYSTEM A. OVERVIEW PAGASA is mandated to “provide adequate, up-to-date data, and timely information on atmospheric, astronomical and other weather-related phenomena using the advances achieved in the realm of science to help government and the people prepare for calamities caused by typhoons, floods, landslides, storm surges, extreme climatic events, and climate change, among others, to afford greater protection to the people. It shall also provide science and technology-based assessments pertinent to decision-making in relevant areas of concern such as in disaster risk reduction, climate change adaptation and integrated water resources management, as well as capacity building.” Specifically, it shall endeavor, among others, “to establish and enhance field weather service centers in strategic areas in the country to broaden the agency base for the delivery of service in the countryside. (Sec. 4 (e))”. In December, 2011, Tropical Storm Washi (known as Sendong) landed along the east coast of Mindanao, Philippines, causing 1,292 deaths, 1,049 missing, 2,002 injured, and total 695,195 people (110,806 families) affected. The total estimated damage for all sectors amounts to PhP 12,086,284,028 and the total estimated losses to the economy reach PhP 1,239,837,773.32. Overall, the recovery and reconstruction need amount to PhP 26,226,715,100.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report
    MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Quarterly Report FY 2020 3rd Quarter – April 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 Submission Date: July 31, 2020 Cooperative Agreement Number: 72049218CA000007 Activity Start Date and End Date: August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 Submitted by: Plan International USA, Inc. This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development Philippine Mission (USAID/Philippines). PROJECT PROFILE USAID/PHILIPPINES Program: MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Activity Start Date and August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 End Date: Name of Prime Plan USA International Inc. Implementing Partner: Cooperative Agreement 72049218CA00007 Number: Names of Ecosystems Work for Essential Benefits (ECOWEB) Subcontractors/Sub Maranao People Development Center, Inc. (MARADECA) awardees: IMPL Project (IMPL) Major Counterpart Organizations Geographic Coverage Lanao del Sur, Marawi City, Lanao del Norte & Iligan City (cities and or countries) Reporting Period: April 1, 2020 to June 30, 2020 2 CONTENTS PROJECT PROFILE .................................................................................................................................... 2 CONTENTS ............................................................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS ............................................................................................................................................. 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oil Palm Expansion in the Philippines Analysis of Land Rights, Environment and Food Security Issues5
    Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples 4. Oil palm expansion in the Philippines Analysis of land rights, environment and food security issues5 Jo Villanueva Introduction In recent years, the unprecedented and rapid expansion of oil palm plantations in Southeast Asia, particularly in Malaysia and Indonesia, has spurred considerable concern in the light of its adverse impact on the environment, biodiversity, global warming, 5 This study has also been published as a chapter in “Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: Trends and Implications for Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples. (FPP & SawitWatch 2011). Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples the displacement of local (and indigenous) communities, the erosion of traditional livelihoods, and the undermining of indigenous peoples and workers‟ rights. In Indonesia, oil palm expansion has contributed to deforestation, peat degradation, loss of biodiversity, ravaging forest fires and a wide range of unresolved social conflicts. In Sarawak, Malaysia, the impact of oil palm includes loss and destruction of forest resources, unequal profit-sharing, water pollution and soil nutrient depletion. In the midst of the increasing profitability of palm oil in the world market, the versatility of its by- products and its potential as a source of biomass in the food and manufacturing industry, a raging debate has ensued between and amongst civil society and industry members over whether palm oil is a necessary evil or whether the costs of this industry on lives, land and environment far outweigh its worth. Although considered a fledgling industry in the Philippine agribusiness sector and while its size is certainly small compared to the millions of hectares of oil palm plantations in Malaysia and Indonesia, the Philippines has been cultivating and processing palm oil for the past three decades.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Report
    MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Quarterly Report FY 2020 1st Quarter – October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 Submission Date: January 31, 2020 Cooperative Agreement Number: 72049218CA00007 Activity Start Date and End Date: August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 Submitted by: Plan International USA, Inc. This document was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development Philippine Mission (USAID/Philippines). 1 PROJECT PROFILE Program: USAID/PHILIPPINES MARAWI RESPONSE PROJECT (MRP) Activity Start Date and End August 29, 2018 – August 28, 2021 Date: Name of Prime Plan USA International Inc. Implementing Partner: Cooperative Agreement 72049218CA00007 Number: Names of Subcontractors/ Ecosystems Work for Essential Benefits (ECOWEB) and Sub-awardees: Maranao People Development Center, Inc. (MARADECA) Major Counterpart Organizations Geographic Coverage Lanao del Sur, Marawi City, Lanao del Norte and Iligan City (cities and or countries) Reporting Period: October 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019 2 CONTENTS PROJECT PROFILE .......................................................................................................... 2 CONTENTS ...................................................................................................................... 3 ACRONYMS ...................................................................................................................... 4 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .......................................................................................... 5 2. PROJECT OVERVIEW .............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Marawi Lessons from Detained Extremists in the Philippines
    POST-MARAWI LESSONS FROM DETAINED EXTREMISTS IN THE PHILIPPINES 27 NOVEMBER 2017 IPAC Report No. 41 CONTENTS I. Introduction ...............................................................................................1 II. The Davao Suspects ....................................................................................2 III. Radicalisation and Recruitment ...............................................................2 A. Fakhrudin Dilangalen’s Recruits ........................................................3 B. T.J. Macabalang’s Recruits..................................................................3 C. What to Watch For Now.....................................................................4 IV. Membership and Training ..... .................................................................5 A. AKP Training in Butril, Palimbang, Sultan Kudarat province .....6 B. Training shifts to Butig, Lanao del Sur, December 2015 ................7 V. Financing .....................................................................................................8 VI. The Dire State of the Criminal Justice System ........................................9 VII. Conclusions ...............................................................................................10 Post-Marawi Lessons from Detained Extremists in the Philippines ©2017 IPAC 1 I. INTRODUCTION Information from the suspects in the September 2016 Davao bombing sheds important light on the radicalization and recruitment processes that led a pro-ISIS coalition to take over the
    [Show full text]
  • Philippines: Marawi Armed-Conflict 3W (As of 18 April 2018)
    Philippines: Marawi Armed-Conflict 3W (as of 18 April 2018) CITY OF Misamis Number of Activities by Status, Cluster & Number of Agencies EL SALVADOR Oriental 138 7,082 ALUBIJID Agencies Activities INITAO Number of CAGAYAN DE CLUSTER Ongoing Planned Completed OPOL ORO CITY (Capital) organizations NAAWAN Number of activities by Municipality/City 1-10 11-50 51-100 101-500 501-1,256 P Cash 12 27 69 10 CCCM 0 0 ILIGAN CITY 571 3 Misamis LINAMON Occidental BACOLOD Coord. 1 0 14 3 KAUSWAGAN TAGOLOAN MATUNGAO MAIGO BALOI POONA KOLAMBUGAN PANTAR TAGOLOAN II Bukidnon PIAGAPO Educ. 32 32 236 11 KAPAI Lanao del Norte PANTAO SAGUIARAN TANGCAL RAGAT MUNAI MARAWI MAGSAYSAY DITSAAN- CITY BUBONG PIAGAPO RAMAIN TUBOD FSAL 23 27 571 53 MARANTAO LALA BUADIPOSO- BAROY BUNTONG MADALUM BALINDONG SALVADOR MULONDO MAGUING TUGAYA TARAKA Health 79 20 537 KAPATAGAN 30 MADAMBA BACOLOD- Lanao TAMPARAN KALAWI SAPAD Lake POONA BAYABAO GANASSI PUALAS BINIDAYAN LUMBACA- Logistics 0 0 3 1 NUNUNGAN MASIU LUMBA-BAYABAO SULTAN NAGA DIMAPORO BAYANG UNAYAN PAGAYAWAN LUMBAYANAGUE BUMBARAN TUBARAN Multi- CALANOGAS LUMBATAN cluster 7 1 146 32 SULTAN PICONG (SULTAN GUMANDER) BUTIG DUMALONDONG WAO MAROGONG Non-Food Items 1 0 221 MALABANG 36 BALABAGAN Nutrition 82 209 519 15 KAPATAGAN Protection 61 37 1,538 37 Maguindanao Shelter 4 4 99 North Cotabato 7 WASH 177 45 1,510 32 COTABATO CITY TOTAL 640 402 6,034 The boundaries, names shown and the designations used on this map do not imply official endorsement or acceptance by the United Nations Creation date: 18 April 2018 Sources: PSA
    [Show full text]
  • Guidance on Abduction of Crew in the Sulu-Celebes Seas and Waters Off Eastern Sabah
    Guidance on Abduction of Crew in the Sulu-Celebes Seas and Waters off Eastern Sabah Produced by: In collaboration with: Supported by: July 2019 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT This guidance was produced by the ReCAAP ISC in collaboration with the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG), and supported by the Asian Shipowners’ Association (ASA) and the Singapore Shipping Association (SSA). This guidance complements the general guidance contained in the ‘Regional Guide to Counter Piracy and Armed Robbery against Ships in Asia’. DISCLAIMER This Guidance, compiled for the Sulu-Celebes Seas and waters off Eastern Sabah, has been prepared for general advisory purpose. This Guidance does not and shall not be construed to impose any obligation or requirement on ship owners or managers to implement any of the measures or advice therein, and any person or entity who wishes to implement the same is advised to exercise due care and discretion in doing so, having due regard to their own requirements and resource capabilities. 2 Contents Introduction 02 Advisory by ReCAAP ISC 04 Measures adopted by the 07 littoral States in the area Modus operandi of past incidents 14 of abduction of crew Case studies of past incidents 20 Information on the Abu Sayyaf 25 Group (ASG) Annex 1 26 Notice to Mariners issued by the Philippines (NOTAM 148-2017 by Philippine Coast Guard) Annex 2 29 Notice to Mariners issued by Malaysia (NOTAM 14 of 2017 by Marine Department of Malaysia, Sabah Region) Annex 3 34 Establishment of Recommended Transit Corridor at Moro Gulf and Basilan Strait issued by the Philippine’s Department of Transportation (Memorandum Circular Number 2017-002 dated 31 March 2017) Annex 4 44 ReCAAP ISC and Supporting Organisations 1 Guidance on Abduction of Crew in the Sulu-Celebes Seas and Waters off Eastern Sabah Introduction This guidance focuses on the incidents of abduction of crew from ships for ransom in the Sulu-Celebes Seas and waters off Eastern Sabah.
    [Show full text]
  • Rice Suitability Map Province of Lanao Del
    123°50' 124°0' 124°10' 124°20' 124°30' 124°40' 124°50' 8°20' 8°20' Province of Misamis Oriental R E P U B L I C O F T H E P H I L I P P I N E S D E P A R T M E N T O F A G R I C U LT U R E BUREAU OF SOIL S AND WATER M ANAGEMENT I l i g a n B a y Elliptical Road Cor. Visayas Ave., Diliman, Quezon City RICE SUITABILITY MAP ( Key Rice Areas ) PROVINCE OF LANAO DEL SUR ° SCALE 1:135,000 8°10' 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8°10' Province of Lanao del Norte Kilometers Projection : Transverse Mercator Datum : Luzon 1911 LEGEND DISCLAIMER : All political boundaries are not authoritative SUITABILITY LIMITING FACTORS AREA DESCRIPTION RATING Moderate Marginal Severe ha % S1 Highly Suitable - - - 544 2.14 S2d d - - 3,710 14.60 S2d S2df S2df d,f - - 10,445 41.10 S2df S2dxf Kapai S2d S2dx d,x - - 897 3.53 S2df S2d S2dxf Moderately Suitable d,x,f - - 1,905 7.50 S2f f - - 1,058 4.16 S2d S2x x - - 1,072 4.22 S2df S2xf x,f - - 3,837 15.10 Saguiaran S3x d x - 467 1.84 Marginally Suitable S2df S3x d,f x - 1,478 5.81 TOTAL. 25,414 100.00 Province of Bukidnon S2df MARAWI S2dx 8°0' Note: Piagapo Highly Suitable (S1) - with none to slight limitations for any given use.
    [Show full text]
  • Marawi Rebuilding from Ashes to a City of Faith, Hope and Peace
    MARAWI REBUILDING FROM ASHES TO A CITY OF FAITH, HOPE AND PEACE MARAWI REBUILDING FROM ASHES TO A CITY OF FAITH, HOPE AND PEACE 1 Marawi: Rebuilding from Ashes to a City of Faith, Hope, and Peace Listening Methodology Development: Soth Plai Ngarm Listening Project Implementation (Training, Processing) Team: Betchak Padilla Mary Schletzbaum Writer/Editor: Tengku Shahpur Cover photo & Inside Photos: Acram Latiph, Field researchers (Listeners) Lay-out: Boonruang Song-Ngam Copy Editor: Lakshmi Jacota Publisher: Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies Funding: Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT) ISBN: 2 Acknowledgements The Centre for Peace and Conflict Studies (CPCS) is grateful to Dansalan College, Mindanao State University and Institute Bangsamoro Studies who have provided invaluable assistance throughout the project. We could not have done this without you. We are especially grateful to all the individuals who volunteered to be listeners. We appreciate the time, energy, enthusiasm and empathy that you demonstrated throughout the process, and your willingness to travel to remote areas. We are especially grateful for the courage you displayed by revisiting the areas where the siege took place and speaking to survivors. Thank you. We would also like to express our heartfelt gratitude to the survivors of the siege who were willing to share their experiences, knowledge and hopes for the future. Thank you for your candor, bravery, and strength and for entrusting us with your voices. Lastly, we would like to thank the Department of Foreign
    [Show full text]
  • DSWD DROMIC Report #1 on the Armed Conflict in Lanao Del Sur As of 22 June 2018, 1AM
    DSWD DROMIC Report #1 on the Armed Conflict in Lanao del Sur as of 22 June 2018, 1AM SUMMARY On 16 June 2018, at around 10:00PM, Armed conflict incident transpired in Tubaran, Lanao del Sur B between the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) and alleged “ISIS group. This resulted in the massive evacuation of affected families. 1. Status of Affected Families/ Persons 3,121 families or 14,873 persons were affected by the armed conflict (see Table 1). Table 1. Affected Families/ Persons NUMBER OF AFFECTED REGION / PROVINCE / MUNICIPALITY Barangays Families Persons GRAND TOTAL 19 3,121 14,873 ARMM 19 3,121 14,873 Lanao del Sur B 19 3,121 14,873 Tubaran 10 1,816 8,614 Pagayawan 7 1,258 6,134 Calanugas 1 15 45 Marogong 1 32 80 Source: DSWD-Field Office XII 2. Status of Displaced Families/Individuals Inside Evacuation Center 739 families or 3,532 persons are currently staying in 17 evacuation centers (see Table 2). Table 2. Displaced Families / Persons Inside Evacuation Centers NUMBER OF NUMBER OF SERVED EVACUATION INSIDE ECs REGION / PROVINCE / CENTERS MUNICIPALITY (ECs) Families Persons CUM NOW CUM NOW CUM NOW GRAND TOTAL 17 17 739 739 3,532 3,532 ARMM 17 17 739 739 3,532 3,532 Lanao del Sur B 17 17 739 739 3,532 3,532 Tubaran 4 4 439 439 2,200 2,200 Pagayawan 5 5 117 117 615 615 Binidayan 3 3 74 74 378 378 Page 1 of 3|DSWD DROMIC Report #1 on the Armed Conflict in Lanao del Sur as of June 22, 2018, 1AM NUMBER OF NUMBER OF SERVED EVACUATION INSIDE ECs REGION / PROVINCE / CENTERS MUNICIPALITY (ECs) Families Persons CUM NOW CUM NOW CUM NOW Ganassi 4 4 98 98 283 283 Madamba 1 1 11 11 56 56 Source: DSWD-Field Office XII Outside Evacuation Center 2,382 families or 11,341 persons are temporarily staying with relatives (see Table 3).
    [Show full text]