• Abstract and Figures
• Public Full-text

Two Decades of Hypergiant Research Alex Lobel Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, 60 Garden Street, Cambridge 02138 MA, USA Abstract. This article is a brief review of the research by Dr. C. de Jager and co-workers over the past twenty years into the physics of hy- pergiant atmospheres. Various important results on the microturbulence, mass-loss, circumstellar environment, atmospheric velocity fields, and the Yellow Evolutionary Void of these enigmatic stars are summarized. As- pects of recent developments and future work are also communicated. 1. Introduction In 1980 Prof. Cornelis de Jager at the University of Utrecht published a book entitled The Brightest Stars. It followed years of scientific research into the question of why there are no stars brighter than a certain upper limit. In other words, what mechanism(s) determine(s) the upper limit of stellar atmospheric stability? His monograph (de Jager 1980) is a compilation which addressed nearly every aspect of massive star research, and which has formed the basis of fundamental progress about these questions during the past two decades. This ‘festschrift’ reviews some of the (partial) answers which have been proposed in the course of time by Dr. de Jager and many co-workers, however without attempting to be complete in all the scientific or chronological details. We also highlight the most important recent developments, based on a limited number of selected references to their work, which will enthuse the reader with this remarkable subject in astrophysics. + arXiv:astro-ph/0108358v1 22 Aug 2001 Cool hypergiants (Ia or Ia0) are a class of supergiant stars with Teff below ∼10,000 K. They are physically different from supergiants of luminosity class Ia. The usual Ia+ designation does not mean that they are always more lumi- nous than the former, but they differ in their spectral properties. These stars show one or more broad emission components in the Balmer Hα line profile, which is a signature of an extended atmosphere or of a relatively large rate of mass loss. Another important spectroscopic aspect of hypergiants is that their absorption lines are significantly broader than those of the Ia stars of similar spectral type and luminosity (de Jager 1998). ρ Cas and HR 8752 are the prototype objects of the yellow hypergiants (F−G Ia+). They are among the most massive (20−40 M⊙) cool stars presently known. These stars exist near the Eddington luminosity limit, and exhibit a wide range of uncommon stellar properties. Their atmospheres are unstable, which causes quasi-periodic pulsa- tion variability, strongly developed large-scale velocity fields, excessive mass-loss, and extended circumstellar envelopes. 1 We summarize three fundamental questions for the study of hypergiants: i. Why do hypergiants of similar bolometric luminosity and spectral type as normal supergiants display the signatures of strong large-scale photospheric mo- tions and enhanced mass loss? Why do these properties appear to be absent for normal supergiants? ii. What is the evolutionary status of the yellow hypergiants, and how do they fit into the broader scheme of massive star evolution? Are they the likely pro- genitors of (Type II) supernovae in the not too distant future? iii. Can an understanding of their atmospheric dynamics and circumstellar envi- ronments provide clues about the origin of the luminosity boundary for evolved stars? Do these dynamics characterize the hypergiants uniquely, or do they oc- cur modified in other classes of luminous stars as well? 2. Microturbulence A few years after The Brightest Stars de Jager (1984) published a theoreti- cal paper which marked the beginning of a thorough study about the stabil- ity of hypergiant atmospheres, and which has consequently been pursued by many other workers in this field. It is put forward for the first time in this paper that atmospheric dynamics is a basic ingredient for understanding a temperature-dependent maximum luminosity limit extending across the entire upper Hertzsprung-Russell (HR) diagram. The classical Eddington limit is de- fined as the line in the HR-diagram where gravity equals the force produced by the radiation pressure due to electron scattering. Neglecting other atmospheric opacity sources, this results in a nearly horizontal line in the HR-diagram for stars with a single mass-luminosity relation. Hence, the classic limit cannot ex- 6 plain the absence of cool supergiants with L⋆∼>10 L⊙, because hot stars that are more luminous do exist. De Jager proposed instead that the local stability of these extended atmospheres is greatly altered by an outward acceleration due to the gradient of turbulent pressure which results from the local field of turbu- lent motions. The importance of the latter scales with luminosity. It causes the effective acceleration, which is due to the balance between gravity, radiation- and turbulent-pressure, to produce higher mass-loss rates for the intrinsically brighter stars. The influence of turbulence is particularly important for the cool supergiants for which the radiation pressure remains rather small. For this rea- son the theoretical luminosity limit of cool stars is occasionally termed the ‘de Jager limit’ (for turbulent pressure). Studies of strong ‘microturbulence’ observed in the spectra of supergiants continue as an important subject of hypergiant research for obvious reasons. It increases the equivalent width of Fraunhofer lines by stochastic small-scale mo- tions with wavelengths smaller than the optical scale height of the atmosphere. The line-of-sight velocity component of these movements samples only a limited part of the photosphere over which the spectral lines are formed. A pertinent problem in pinpointing the physical nature of stellar microturbulence is that it is often observed to exceed the sound speed in supergiant atmospheres. Mi- croturbulence generally increases towards the hotter and more luminous stars. 2 It is frequently larger than the isothermal velocity of sound in the Ia and Iab supergiants. In 1991 de Jager chaired an international congress in Amsterdam about instabilities in evolved super- and hypergiants. At the conference he presented the idea that stellar microturbulence is strongly related to the physics of at- mospheric shock waves. Through numerical integrations of the hydrodynamics equations an observable microturbulent velocity is computed, assuming that the dependence of shock wave energy on the wavenumber is of the Kolmogoroff-type (a power law spectrum) (de Jager 1992a). Shock trains propagating outwards are a natural consequence of acoustic energy generation in cool stars with a subphotospheric convection zone. De Jager et al. (1997) subsequently showed that the thin heated layers trailing these shocks constitute the main part of the observed micro-‘turbulence’. A complex of successive hot sheets, distributed stochastically over the atmosphere, yields a stochastic distribution of thermal motions that, observationally, cannot be distinguished from a random field of small-scale hydrodynamic motions (de Jager 1998). The application of this theory to the yellow hypergiant ρ Cas revealed that a field of atmospheric shock waves which is critically supersonic, or have a mean Mach number only slightly exceeding unity, reproduces the observed supersonic microturbulence velocity of 11 km s−1. Remarkably, the hydrodynamic velocity field in the shocks remains very small, of the order of only 0.5 kms−1. Nev- ertheless, the momentum provided by such weak shock wave trains, assuming spherical geometric symmetry, is sufficient to initiate the large mass-loss rates −5 −1 (typically a few times 10 M⊙yr ) observed in cool hypergiants (de Jager 1996). These rates partly result from the very large stellar surface area (the mean photospheric radius of ρ Cas ranges between 400 and 500 R⊙), and the sonic point which is situated well inside the photosphere (de Jager et al. 2001). The field of stochastic shock waves provides on average outward directed mo- mentum which diminishes the effective atmospheric acceleration and increases the atmospheric scale height. 3. Mass Loss Evolutionary calculations show that yellow supergiants evolve along tracks of nearly constant luminosity, beneath an observational luminosity limit. This limit has been called the Humphreys-Davidson (HD) limit, when it was pointed out that the luminosity of the brightest blue stars is about a factor six higher than that of the luminous red stars. Very evolved luminous supergiants move bluewards in the HR-diagram because they shed copious amounts of mass to the circumstellar/interstellar environment in the red supergiant phase. During redward evolution the very high mass-loss rates (M˙ ) reduce the stability of the convective layer, and below a critical envelope mass it contracts into a thinner radiative envelope, which causes rapid blueward evolution. For only a limited range of initial masses stars can become red supergiants, and evolve back far bluewards. The late stages in the fast evolution of these massive stars are rel- atively short. Typical values computed for stars with masses between 20 and 40 M⊙ are around one million years, with blueward tracks which last only a few 3 times 104 years. The high M˙ for very massive stars is however thought to have a decisive influence on these late evolutionary stages. De Jager et al. (1988) presented a comprehensive table of empirical mass- loss rates for 271 objects all over the HR-diagram, together with a parameter- ization which holds for stars from early to late spectral types (Nieuwenhuijzen & de Jager 1990). M˙ primarily depends on the stellar luminosity L⋆. For hot stars there appears to be a rather linear dependence, whereas K and M stars deviate by about 3 dex from the average hot star dependence. This points to other parameters than L⋆ (and Teff ) which influence the mass-loss rate (de Jager 1993). It seems imperative to ascribe the difference to the different phys- ical mechanisms which drive the massive stellar winds in the hot and in the cool supergiants.

Load more

  11

Copy Link