Field Theory Insight from the Ads/CFT Correspondence

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Field Theory Insight from the Ads/CFT Correspondence TMR2000 PROCEEDINGS Field theory insight from the AdS/CFT correspondence Daniel Z.Freedman1 and Pierre Henry-Labord`ere2 1Department of Mathematics and Center for Theoretical Physics Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 01239 E-mail: [email protected] 2LPT-ENS, 24, Rue Lhomond F{75231 Paris C´edex 05, France E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: A survey of ideas, techniques and results from d=5 supergravity for the conformal and mass-perturbed phases of d=4 N =4 Super-Yang-Mills theory. 1. Introduction while the phases with RG-flow are described by solitons or domain wall solutions. The AdS/CF T correspondence [1, 20, 11, 12] al- The result of work by many theorists over lows one to calculate quantities of interest in cer- the last few years is a quantitative picture of the tain d=4 supersymmetric gauge theories using 5 strong coupling limit of the theory which is a re- and 10-dimensional supergravity. Miraculously markable advance on previous knowledge. In this one gets information on a strong coupling limit lecture we will survey some of the ideas, tech- of the gauge theory– information not otherwise niques, and results on the conformal and mas- available– from classical supergravity in which sive phases of the theory. We attempt to reach calculations are feasible. non-specialists and are minimally technical. The prime example of AdS/CF T is the du- ality between N =4 SYM theory and D=10 Type 2. The N =4 SYM theory IIB supergravity. The field theory has the very special property that it is ultraviolet finite and The N =4 SUSY Yang-Mills theory in d=4 with thus conformal invariant. Many years of elegant SU(N) gauge group can be obtained by dimen- work on 2-dimensional CFT0s has taught us that sional reduction of d=10 SYM. The fields consist it is useful to consider both the conformal theory of a gauge field Aµ, 4 Weyl fermions λa (in 4 of and its deformation by relevant operators which the R-symmetry group SU(4)) and 6 real scalars changes the long distance behavior and generates Xi (in 6 of SU(4)). Each of these fields can be a renormalization group flow of the couplings. taken as an N × N traceless Hermitian matrix of Analogously, in d=4, one can consider the adjoint of SU(N). The R-symmetry or fla- a) the conformal phase of N =4 SYM vor symmetry group will play a more important b) the same theory deformed by adding mass role in our discussion than the gauge group. Ex- terms to its Lagrangian plicit calculations have shown that the β func- c) the Coulomb/Higgs phase. tion of the theory is zero up to three-loop or- Conformal symmetry is broken in the last two der, and arguments for ultraviolet finiteness to cases. There is now considerable evidence that all orders have been given [21, 22, 23]. Finite- the strong coupling behavior of all 3 phases can ness implies conformal symmetry. The confor- be described quantitatively by classical super- mal group of 4-dimensional Minkowski space is gravity. In the conformal phase, the AdS5 × S5 SO(4, 2)∼SU(2, 2). This combines with the R- “ground state” of D=10 supergravity is relevant, symmetry SO(6)∼SU(4) and N =4 SUSY to give TMR2000 Daniel Z.Freedman1 and Pierre Henry-Labord`ere2 the superalgebra SU(2, 2|4) which is the over- 2. The scalar potential of the theory is a positive arching invariance of the theory. It contains 4N =16 quartic in Xi of the form a supercharges Qα associated with Poincar´eSUSY 2 i j 2 and 4N =16 additional conformal supercharges. V (X)=bgYMTr([X ,X ]) (2.2) The observables of the theory are the cor- relation functions of gauge invariant operators There is thus a moduli space of supersymmetric h i which are composites of the elementary fields. minima, ie V ( X )=0, in which the vacuum ex- h ii These operators are classified in irreducible rep- pectation values X are traceless diagonal ma- resentations (irreps) of SU(2, 2|4). There are trices. Generically the preserved gauge symme- N−1 many such operators, but those of chief interest try is U(1) , and the particle content at a − for AdS/CF T belong to short representations. generic point of moduli space is N 1 massless 2 − The scale dimension ∆ of these is fixed at inte- photons, N N massive gauge bosons and su- N ger or 1/2-integer values and correlated with the perpartners. This gives a representation of =4 SU(4) irrep. One basic reference on the irreps supersymmetry with central charges. of SU(2, 2|4) is [25, 24] and there is considerable 3. We will also be interested in supersymmet- information in the current literature, e.g. see [2] ric mass deformations of the theory. It is then Chiral primary operators correspond to low- convenient to describe the deformed theory us- N est weight states of short irreps. The most im- ing =1 chiral superfields Φi(i =1,2,3) whose portant ones are lowest components are complex superpositions of the 6 Xi. The deformed theory has the superpo- k (i1 i2 ik ) TrX = TrX X ...X (2.1) tential where the parentheses indicate a symmetric trace- X3 1 2 less tensor in the SO(6) indices. The rank k chi- W = g TrΦ3[Φ1, Φ2]+ m Tr(Φ ) YM 2 i i ral primary has dimension ∆=k, and the Dynkin i=1 (2.3) designation of its R-symmetry irrep is (0,k,0). The dynamics then turns out to depend very dra- The dimensions of these irreps are 20’ for k=2, matically on the pattern of the mass parameters 50 for k=3, 105 for k=4.... By applying Qa to α m . these operators, we obtain descendant operators i For m3 =06 and m1=m2=0, the methods of Seiberg in the same SU(2, 2|4) irrep. For example, the dynamics have been used [50] to show that con- descendants of TrX2 include the SU(4) flavor I formal symmetry is broken at intermediate scales, currents J and the stress tensor Tµν . µ but the theory flows to a non trivial conformal The dynamics of N =4 SYM has been much fixed point in the infrared limit. explored through the years. We now mention a For m1 =m2 =m3 =m, the supersymmetric vacua few aspects of this dynamics which will be illu- 1 2 m obey [φ ,φ ]= φ3 and are in one-to-one cor- minated later, through AdS/CF T . gYM respondence with representations of SU(2) [5]. 1. Ward identities, anomalies, and N =1 Seiberg The long distance physics depends on which vac- dynamics can be combined [26] to show that 2- uum is chosen, and gauge symmetry can be real- point functions of flavor currents and stress ten- ized in both confined and Higgsed phases. sor are not renormalized. This means that all We have time and space here to discuss only the radiative corrections vanish and the exact cor- holographic dual of the first mass deformation relation functions are given by the free-field ap- [6], despite extremely interesting recent work on proximation. Using N =1 conformal superspace the second [31, 41, 51]. [4], this result can be extended to 2- and 3-point functions of the lowest chiral primary TrX2 and all descendents. Similar results can be derived 3. D=10 Type IIB Supergravity using extended superspace [3]. It is also known that 4-point correlation functions do receive ra- The bosonic fields of the D=10 IIB supergravity diative corrections, so the theory is not secretly consist of a metric g, a scalar dilaton φ and axion a free theory. C, two three-forms and a self-dual five-form F5. 2 TMR2000 Daniel Z.Freedman1 and Pierre Henry-Labord`ere2 The classical equations admit as exact back- sional reduction process is already very compli- 5 5 ground AdS5 × S with F5=Nvol(S ). N comes cated at the linear level, since the independent from flux quantization. The fields φ and C are (i.e. uncoupled) 5-dimensional fields are actu- constant and the other fields vanishes. ally mixtures of those in the 10-dimensional the- The complete Kaluza-Klein mass spectrum ory [8]. The nonlinear interactions are even more 5 on AdS5 × S was obtained in [8]. It is organized complicated, and they have been worked out in into super-multiplets whose component fields are only a few sectors of the theory [18]. in representations of the SO(6) isometry group On the other hand there is a known complete of S5. The lowest multiplet contains the graviton nonlinear 5-dimensional supergravity theory, the and its super-partners: gauged N =8 theory of [10, 9] which contains the α ∗ (gµν ,ψµ in the 4 +4 ,Aµ in the 15, Bµν in fields of the graviton multiplet above and is in- ∗ ∗ i the 6c, λ in the 4 +10+4 +10 , the scalars ϕ variant under the same superalgebra. This D=5 ∗ N in the 1c +10+10 +20) =8 theory is believed to be a consistent trun- 5 Each of these fields is the lowest state of cation of the Type IIB theory on AdS5 × S . a Kaluza-Klein tower of fields. For example a This means that any classical solution of the D=5 scalar of the D=10 theory can be expanded as theory can be lifted to an exact solution of the D=10.
Recommended publications
  • Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity
    universe Review Conformal Symmetry in Field Theory and in Quantum Gravity Lesław Rachwał Instituto de Física, Universidade de Brasília, Brasília DF 70910-900, Brazil; [email protected] Received: 29 August 2018; Accepted: 9 November 2018; Published: 15 November 2018 Abstract: Conformal symmetry always played an important role in field theory (both quantum and classical) and in gravity. We present construction of quantum conformal gravity and discuss its features regarding scattering amplitudes and quantum effective action. First, the long and complicated story of UV-divergences is recalled. With the development of UV-finite higher derivative (or non-local) gravitational theory, all problems with infinities and spacetime singularities might be completely solved. Moreover, the non-local quantum conformal theory reveals itself to be ghost-free, so the unitarity of the theory should be safe. After the construction of UV-finite theory, we focused on making it manifestly conformally invariant using the dilaton trick. We also argue that in this class of theories conformal anomaly can be taken to vanish by fine-tuning the couplings. As applications of this theory, the constraints of the conformal symmetry on the form of the effective action and on the scattering amplitudes are shown. We also remark about the preservation of the unitarity bound for scattering. Finally, the old model of conformal supergravity by Fradkin and Tseytlin is briefly presented. Keywords: quantum gravity; conformal gravity; quantum field theory; non-local gravity; super- renormalizable gravity; UV-finite gravity; conformal anomaly; scattering amplitudes; conformal symmetry; conformal supergravity 1. Introduction From the beginning of research on theories enjoying invariance under local spacetime-dependent transformations, conformal symmetry played a pivotal role—first introduced by Weyl related changes of meters to measure distances (and also due to relativity changes of periods of clocks to measure time intervals).
    [Show full text]
  • Flux Moduli Stabilisation, Supergravity Algebras and No-Go Theorems Arxiv
    IFT-UAM/CSIC-09-36 Flux moduli stabilisation, Supergravity algebras and no-go theorems Beatriz de Carlosa, Adolfo Guarinob and Jes´usM. Morenob a School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK b Instituto de F´ısicaTe´oricaUAM/CSIC, Facultad de Ciencias C-XVI, Universidad Aut´onomade Madrid, Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain Abstract We perform a complete classification of the flux-induced 12d algebras compatible with the set of N = 1 type II orientifold models that are T-duality invariant, and allowed by the symmetries of the 6 ¯ T =(Z2 ×Z2) isotropic orbifold. The classification is performed in a type IIB frame, where only H3 and Q fluxes are present. We then study no-go theorems, formulated in a type IIA frame, on the existence of Minkowski/de Sitter (Mkw/dS) vacua. By deriving a dictionary between the sources of potential energy in types IIB and IIA, we are able to combine algebra results and no-go theorems. The outcome is a systematic procedure for identifying phenomenologically viable models where Mkw/dS vacua may exist. We present a complete table of the allowed algebras and the viability of their resulting scalar potential, and we point at the models which stand any chance of producing a fully stable vacuum. arXiv:0907.5580v3 [hep-th] 20 Jan 2010 e-mail: [email protected] , [email protected] , [email protected] Contents 1 Motivation and outline 1 2 Fluxes and Supergravity algebras 3 2.1 The N = 1 orientifold limits as duality frames . .4 2.2 T-dual algebras in the isotropic Z2 × Z2 orientifolds .
    [Show full text]
  • Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly
    CTP-TAMU-06/93 Twenty Years of the Weyl Anomaly † M. J. Duff ‡ Center for Theoretical Physics Physics Department Texas A & M University College Station, Texas 77843 ABSTRACT In 1973 two Salam prot´eg´es (Derek Capper and the author) discovered that the conformal invariance under Weyl rescalings of the metric tensor 2 gµν(x) Ω (x)gµν (x) displayed by classical massless field systems in interac- tion with→ gravity no longer survives in the quantum theory. Since then these Weyl anomalies have found a variety of applications in black hole physics, cosmology, string theory and statistical mechanics. We give a nostalgic re- view. arXiv:hep-th/9308075v1 16 Aug 1993 CTP/TAMU-06/93 July 1993 †Talk given at the Salamfest, ICTP, Trieste, March 1993. ‡ Research supported in part by NSF Grant PHY-9106593. When all else fails, you can always tell the truth. Abdus Salam 1 Trieste and Oxford Twenty years ago, Derek Capper and I had embarked on our very first post- docs here in Trieste. We were two Salam students fresh from Imperial College filled with ideas about quantizing the gravitational field: a subject which at the time was pursued only by mad dogs and Englishmen. (My thesis title: Problems in the Classical and Quantum Theories of Gravitation was greeted with hoots of derision when I announced it at the Cargese Summer School en route to Trieste. The work originated with a bet between Abdus Salam and Hermann Bondi about whether you could generate the Schwarzschild solution using Feynman diagrams. You can (and I did) but I never found out if Bondi ever paid up.) Inspired by Salam, Capper and I decided to use the recently discovered dimensional regularization1 to calculate corrections to the graviton propaga- tor from closed loops of massless particles: vectors [1] and spinors [2], the former in collaboration with Leopold Halpern.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008
    MIT OpenCourseWare http://ocw.mit.edu 8.821 String Theory Fall 2008 For information about citing these materials or our Terms of Use, visit: http://ocw.mit.edu/terms. 8.821 F2008 Lecture 11: CFT continued; geometry of AdS Lecturer: McGreevy October 17, 2008 In this session, we are going to talk about the following topics. 1. We are making a few comments about CFT. 2. We are discussing spheres and hyperboloids. 3. Finally we are focusing on Lorentzian AdS and its boundary. 1 Conformal Symmetry 1.1 Weyl anomaly Quantumly, conformal symmetry in a curved space (with even number of dimensions) could be anomalous, that is ds2 → Ω(x)ds2 could be no longer a symmetry of the full quantum theory. This µ anomaly can be evaluated from the following diagram with operator Tµ inserted at the left vertex. Figure 1: A contribution to the Weyl anomaly. The conformal anomaly signals a nonzero value for the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. In a curved spacetime, it is related to the curvature: µ D/2 Tµ ∼ R 1 where R denotes some scalar contractions of curvature tensors and D is the number of spacetime dimensions; the power is determined by dimensional analysis. For the special case of D = 2, this is c T µ = − R(2) (1) µ 12 where R(2) is the Ricci scalar in two dimensions and c is the central charge of the Virasoro algebra µ of the 2d CFT. Also in D = 4, the anomaly is given by Tµ = aW + cGB where W and B are defined as 1 W = (Weyl tensor)2 = R....R − 2R..R + R2 (2) ...
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Conformal Descriptions of Black Hole Entropy
    Entropy 2011, 13, 1355-1379; doi:10.3390/e13071355 OPEN ACCESS entropy ISSN 1099-4300 www.mdpi.com/journal/entropy Article Effective Conformal Descriptions of Black Hole Entropy Steven Carlip Department of Physics, University of California at Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; E-Mail: [email protected]. Received: 1 July 2011; in revised form: 12 July 2011 / Accepted: 19 July 2011 / Published: 20 July 2011 Abstract: It is no longer considered surprising that black holes have temperatures and entropies. What remains surprising, though, is the universality of these thermodynamic properties: their exceptionally simple and general form, and the fact that they can be derived from many very different descriptions of the underlying microscopic degrees of freedom. I review the proposal that this universality arises from an approximate conformal symmetry, which permits an effective “conformal dual” description that is largely independent of the microscopic details. Keywords: black holes; Bekenstein–Hawking entropy; conformal dual 1. Introduction Since the seminal work of Bekenstein [1] and Hawking [2], we have understood that black holes behave as thermodynamic systems, with characteristic temperatures and entropies. A central task for quantum gravity is finding a statistical mechanical description of this behavior in terms of microscopic states. One important clue may come from the surprising “universality” of these thermodynamic properties, which manifests itself in two ways: – The Bekenstein–Hawking entropy A S = (1) 4G takes the same simple form for all black holes, independent of the charges, spin, and even the number of spacetime dimensions. If the action differs from that of general relativity, the entropy is modified, but again in a simple and universal way [3].
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of Supersymmetry and Its Breaking
    1 Aspects of Supersymmetry and its Breaking a b Thomas T. Dumitrescu ∗ and Zohar Komargodski † aDepartment of Physics, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey, 08544, USA bSchool of Natural Sciences, Institute for Advanced Study, Princeton, New Jersey, 08540, USA We describe some basic aspects of supersymmetric field theories, emphasizing the structure of various supersym- metry multiplets. In particular, we discuss supercurrents – multiplets which contain the supersymmetry current and the energy-momentum tensor – and explain how they can be used to constrain the dynamics of supersym- metric field theories, supersymmetry breaking, and supergravity. These notes are based on lectures delivered at the Carg´ese Summer School 2010 on “String Theory: Formal Developments and Applications,” and the CERN Winter School 2011 on “Supergravity, Strings, and Gauge Theory.” 1. Supersymmetric Theories In this review we will describe some basic aspects of SUSY field theories, emphasizing the structure 1.1. Supermultiplets and Superfields of various supermultiplets – especially those con- A four-dimensional theory possesses = 1 taining the supersymmetry current. In particu- supersymmetry (SUSY) if it contains Na con- 1 lar, we will show how these supercurrents can be served spin- 2 charge Qα which satisfies the anti- used to study the dynamics of supersymmetric commutation relation field theories, SUSY-breaking, and supergravity. ¯ µ Qα, Qα˙ = 2σαα˙ Pµ . (1) We begin by recalling basic facts about super- { } multiplets and superfields. A set of bosonic and Here Q¯ is the Hermitian conjugate of Q . (We α˙ α fermionic operators B(x) and F (x) fur- will use bars throughout to denote Hermitian con- i i nishes a supermultiplet{O if these} operators{O satisfy} jugation.) Unless otherwise stated, we follow the commutation relations of the schematic form conventions of [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to String Theory A.N
    Introduction to String Theory A.N. Schellekens Based on lectures given at the Radboud Universiteit, Nijmegen Last update 6 July 2016 [Word cloud by www.worldle.net] Contents 1 Current Problems in Particle Physics7 1.1 Problems of Quantum Gravity.........................9 1.2 String Diagrams................................. 11 2 Bosonic String Action 15 2.1 The Relativistic Point Particle......................... 15 2.2 The Nambu-Goto action............................ 16 2.3 The Free Boson Action............................. 16 2.4 World sheet versus Space-time......................... 18 2.5 Symmetries................................... 19 2.6 Conformal Gauge................................ 20 2.7 The Equations of Motion............................ 21 2.8 Conformal Invariance.............................. 22 3 String Spectra 24 3.1 Mode Expansion................................ 24 3.1.1 Closed Strings.............................. 24 3.1.2 Open String Boundary Conditions................... 25 3.1.3 Open String Mode Expansion..................... 26 3.1.4 Open versus Closed........................... 26 3.2 Quantization.................................. 26 3.3 Negative Norm States............................. 27 3.4 Constraints................................... 28 3.5 Mode Expansion of the Constraints...................... 28 3.6 The Virasoro Constraints............................ 29 3.7 Operator Ordering............................... 30 3.8 Commutators of Constraints.......................... 31 3.9 Computation of the Central Charge.....................
    [Show full text]
  • Geometrical Approximation to the Ads/CFT Correspondence
    International Journal of Advanced Research in Physical Science (IJARPS) Volume 3, Issue 6, 2016, PP 26-30 ISSN 2349-7874 (Print) & ISSN 2349-7882 (Online) www.arcjournals.org Geometrical Approximation to the AdS/CFT Correspondence M. A. Martin Contreras*, J. M. R. Roldan Giraldo* *High Energy Physics Group, University of los Andes, Colombia Abstract: In this paper an analysis of the geometrical construction of the AdS/CFT Correspondence is made. A geometrical definition of the configuration manifold and the boundary manifold in terms of the conformal compactification scheme is given. As a conclusion,it was obtained that the usual definition of the correspondence [2] is strongly dependent of the unicity of the conformal class of metrics on the boundary. Finally, a summary of some of the geometrical issues of the correspondence is made, along with a possible way to avoid them. 1. INTRODUCTION Gravity/Gauge duality is maybe one of the most important developments of the latest times in String Theory. From its very beginning, dual models have been applied in many areas different from High Energy Physics or Black Hole Physics. Any branch of Physics that exhibits phase transitions can be modeled using dual models [1]. The central idea of Gravity/Gauge duality is the geometrical connection existing between any Gravity Theory (Superstrings, for example) in d+1 dimensions to a QFT living in d dimensions. In fact, we could say that we can extract information about QFT from spacetime, and vice versa. This is just a conjecture, and it still needs a proof. Once we have established the connection, the next step is writing of a proper dictionary, allowing us to switch between Gravity and QFT.
    [Show full text]
  • Generalizing Entropic Force Formalism
    Yongpyung 2012, Greenpia Condo, Feb. 21st 2012 GENERALIZING ENTROPIC FORCE FORMALISM Jin-Ho Cho (Hanyang University) w/ Hosin Gong, Hyosung Kim (POSTECH) Motivation (for the entropic force) Quantum Gravity .....not successful so far the role of gravity in AdS/CFT tree level supergravity (closed string) / quantum SYM (open string) Fundamental or Emergent? Entropic Force rubber band tends to increase the entropy S : larger S : smaller [Halliday et al., Fundamentals of Physics] Verlinde’s Idea [Erik Verlinde, 1001.0785] entropic force : F x = T S 4 4 3 holographic principle : Ac /G~ = N E = NkBT/2 T = ~a/2πkBc entropy change : S =2πkB( x mc/~) 4 4 (for a screen shift x ) 4 Newtonian Physics Newton’s law : (a planar screen) T = ~a/2πckB S =2πkB( x mc/~) 4 4 F x = T S 4 4 ~a 2πkBmc x = 4 2πk c ✓ B ◆✓ ~ ◆ = ma x 4 3 Gravitational force : (a spherical screen) N = Ac /G~ 2 Mc = E = NkBT/2 1 Ac3 ~a r2c2 = = a 2 G 2πc ✓ ~ ◆✓ ◆ G Q1: Cosmological Constant ? g R ab R + ⇤g =8⇡GT ab − 2 ab ab 3 Ac /G~ = N F x = T S S =2πkB( x mc/~) 4 4 E = NkBT/2 4 4 T = ~a/2πkBc ‘Volume Energy’ NkBT E = Mc2 +↵V = 2 N~ a ~a = T = 4⇡c 2⇡ckB 2 Ac a 3 = N = Ac /G~ 4⇡G 4⇡GM 4⇡G↵V a = + A Ac2 Determination of ↵ spherically symmetric case GM 4⇡G↵r a = + = Φ r2 3c2 r GM c2⇤r = Newtonian limit of Einstein eq. r2 − 3 c4 ↵ = ⇤ −4⇡G Einstein equation 4 c NkBT E = Mc2 ⇤V = − 4⇡G 2 c4 k c3 Mc2 ⇤ dV = B TdN = adA − 4⇡G 2 4⇡G Z Z Z 1 a b 1 a b 2 T Tg n ⇠ dV ⇤gabn ⇠ dV ab − 2 ab −4⇡G Z⌃ ✓ ◆ Z⌃ 1 = R na⇠b dV 4⇡G ab Z⌃ Q2: Entropic Coulomb Force ? [JHC & Hyosung Kim, 2012 J.
    [Show full text]
  • Dynamical Gravitational Corrections to the Conformal Anomaly
    Dynamical gravitational corrections to the conformal anomaly Raquel Santos-Garcia Invisibles Workshop 2019 13th of June of 2019 Work in collaboration with Enrique Alvarez and Jesus Anero Idea Can we tell if gravity is dynamical or not by computing the conformal anomaly? Is gravity a fundamental interaction? Existence of gravitons Entropic origin Is gravity a fundamental interaction? Existence of gravitons Entropic origin Einstein’s general Theory for the relativity (GR) gravitational field Fierz-Pauli lagrangian for free spin 2 particles When interactions are GR included in a consistent way Is gravity a fundamental interaction? Existence of gravitons Entropic origin Einstein’s general Theory for the Dictionary between BH laws and relativity (GR) gravitational field thermodymacial laws δS = δA Fierz-Pauli lagrangian for free spin 2 Instead of thinking in Entropic particles the fundamental dof force Jacobson, Padmanabhan, Verlinde,… Einstein equations arise from minimizing the entropy (the area) with a fixed volume When interactions are GR included in a consistent way Conformal anomaly Conformal anomaly Scale In the UV intuitive idea that masses should be unimportant invariance Conformal anomaly Scale In the UV intuitive idea that masses should be unimportant invariance Scale invariance Conformal invariance Weyl invariance (flat spacetime) (flat spacetime) (curved spacetimes) μ μ 2 x → λ x Conformal group gμν → Ω(x) gμν Conformal anomaly Scale In the UV intuitive idea that masses should be unimportant invariance Scale invariance Conformal
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    SEBASTIAN DE HARO Curriculum Vitae Assistant Professor in Philosophy of Science at the Institute for Logic, Language and Computation and the Institute of Physics of the University of Amsterdam 1. RESEARCH PROFILE Areas of specialisation: Philosophy of Science, History and Philosophy of Physics, Theoretical Physics Areas of competence: Epistemology, Metaphysics, Ethics, Philosophical and Social Aspects of Information, History of Science, History of Philosophy, Philosophy of Logic and Language, Philosophy of Mathematics 2. PREVIOUS POSITIONS • Lecturer (2009-2020), Amsterdam University College (AUC), University of Amsterdam. Tasks: teaching, curriculum development and evaluation, thesis supervision, member of the BSA committee. Between 2009-2015 I also had tutoring responsibilities. • Lecturer (2019-2020, fixed term), Department of Philosophy, Free University Amsterdam • Lecturer in theoretical physics (fixed term), Institute for Theoretical Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Amsterdam. Teaching, research, thesis supervision. 02/12 - 07/14. • Research associate. Managing editor of Foundations of Physics on behalf of Gerard ’t Hooft, Spinoza Institute/ITP, Utrecht University and Springer Verlag, 2008-2009. Research, managing editorial office, setting up new projects, contact Editorial Board. 3. PUBLICATIONS Total number of citations (all publications): 2,751. i10-index: 33. h-index: 22 Full list of publications and citation information via Google scholar profile: http://scholar.google.nl/citations?user=rmXDqN4AAAAJ&hl=nl&oi=ao Journal articles, book chapters, and book reviews General philosophy of science: journal articles (6) 1. ‘The Empirical Under-determination Argument Against Scientific Realism for Dual Theories’. Erkenntnis, 2021. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10670-020-00342-0 2. ‘Science and Philosophy: A Love-Hate Relationship’.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking
    An Introduction to Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking Thomas Walshe September 28, 2009 Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science of Imperial College London Abstract We present an introduction to dynamical supersymmetry breaking, highlighting its phenomenological significance in the context of 4D field theories. Observations concerning the conditions for supersymmetry breaking are studied. Holomorphy and duality are shown to be key ideas behind dynamical mechanisms for supersymmetry breaking, with attention paid to supersymmetric QCD. Towards the end we discuss models incorporating DSB which aid the search for a complete theory of nature. 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 General Arguments 8 2.1 Supersymmetry Algebra . 8 2.2 Superfield formalism . 10 2.3 Flat Directions . 12 2.4 Global Symmetries . 15 2.5 The Goldstino . 17 2.6 The Witten Index . 19 3 Tree Level Supersymmetry Breaking 20 3.1 O'Raifeartaigh Models . 20 3.2 Fayet-Iliopoulos Mechanism . 22 3.3 Holomorphicity and non-renormalistation theorems . 23 4 Non-perturbative Gauge Dynamics 25 4.1 Supersymmetric QCD . 26 4.2 ADS superpotential . 26 4.3 Theories with F ≥ N ................................. 28 5 Models of Dynamical Supersymmetry Breaking 33 5.1 3-2 model . 34 5.2 SU(5) theory . 36 5.3 SU(7) with confinement . 37 5.4 Generalisation of these models . 38 5.5 Non-chiral model with classical flat directions . 40 2 5.6 Meta-Stable Vacua . 41 6 Gauge Mediated Supersymmetry Breaking 42 7 Conclusion 45 8 Acknowledgments 46 9 References 46 3 1 Introduction The success of the Standard Model (SM) is well documented yet it is not without its flaws.
    [Show full text]