Academic Writing: the Basics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Academic Writing: the Basics Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine Sumy State Teacher‟s Training University named after A.S. Makarenko Klochko L.I., Terenko O.O. ACADEMIC WRITING: THE BASICS Manual Sumy - 2019 1 УДК 811.111:003-028.42(075.8) К50 Рекомендовано до друку вченою радою Сумського державного педагогічного університету імені А.С. Макаренка (Протокол № 3 від 28 жовтня 2019 року) Рецензенти: В.І. Школяренко – доктор філологічного наук, професор, завідувач кафедри германської філології Сумського державного педагогічного університету імені А.С. Макаренка. Н.М. Бідюк практики– доктор педагогічнихіноземної мовинаук, професор,та методики завідувачвикладання кафедри Хмельницького національного університету. С.С. Данилюк – доктор педагогічних наук, професор, професор кафедри практики англійської мови Черкаського національного університету імені Богдана Хмельницького Клочко Л. І., Terenko O. O. К50 Academic Writing ; the Basics : Manual / Л. І. Клочко, O. O.Terenko. – Суми : ФОП Цьома С. П., 2019 . – 88 с. У посібнику систематизовано лексичні одиниці, що відображають ключові категорії, які використовуються при написанні наукових статей та дисертації. Класифіковано статті відповідно до наукових напрямів, які можуть бути використані для розвитку та перевірки рівня сформованоситі реферативних умінь. Підібрано тексти для визначення рівня сформованості лексичної та граматичної компетентності. Посібник адресовано магістрам та аспірантам немовних спеціальностей. УДК 811.111:003 - 028.42 (075.8) © Клочко Л.І., Теренко О.О., 2019 © ФОП Цьома С.П., 2019 © СумДПУ імені А.С. макаренка, 2019 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................... 5 Unit 1. The Schemes of Introduction. ........................................................................ 6 1. Writing Introductions ............................................................................................ 6 2. Describing the scope of a current project or prior research. Describing the analytical elements of a paper ...................................................... 7 3. Discussing results .................................................................................................. 8 4. Explaining the impact of new research ................................................................. 8 Unit 2. The Ways of Scientific Writing. .................................................................... 9 1. Establishing the importance of the topic for the discipline................................... 9 2. Highlighting a problem ......................................................................................... 9 3. Highlighting a controversy in the field of study ................................................... 9 4. Highlighting inadequacies of previous studies ................................................... 10 5. Highlighting a knowledge gap in the field of study ............................................ 10 6. Indicating the focus, aim, argument of a short paper .......................................... 11 7. Stating the purpose of research ........................................................................... 12 8. Research questions or hypotheses ....................................................................... 12 9. Synopsis of the research design, method, source(s) of data ............................... 13 10. Indicating significance ...................................................................................... 13 11. Indicating limitations......................................................................................... 13 12. Giving reasons for personal interest .................................................................. 14 13. Outlining the structure ....................................................................................... 14 14. Explaining Keywords (refer to Defining Terms) .............................................. 15 15. General descriptions of the relevant literature .................................................. 15 16. General reference to previous research or scholarship: normally more than one author ........................................................................................... 15 17. Describing Methods .......................................................................................... 17 18. Describing previously used methods ................................................................ 17 19. Giving reasons why a particular method was adopted or rejected ................... 17 20. Indicating a specific method ............................................................................. 18 21. Describing the characteristics of the sample ..................................................... 18 22. Indicating reasons for sample characteristics.................................................... 19 23. Describing the process: infinitive of purpose ................................................... 19 24. Statements of positive result ............................................................................. 20 25. Statements of negative result ............................................................................ 20 26. Highlighting significant, interesting or surprising results ................................. 20 27. Reporting a reaction .......................................................................................... 21 28. Reporting results from questionnaires and interviews ...................................... 21 3 29. Observations about qualitative data .................................................................. 22 30. Transition statements......................................................................................... 22 31. Summary and transition .................................................................................... 23 32. Statements of result: usually with reference to results section ......................... 23 33. Unexpected outcome ......................................................................................... 23 34. Reference to previous research: support ........................................................... 24 35. Commenting on findings ................................................................................... 24 36. Suggestions for future work .............................................................................. 25 Unit 3. The Texts for Checking Practical Skiles. ................................................... 26 Skiing ....................................................................................................................... 26 Deadly bird flu type detected .................................................................................. 27 THE SPREAD OF ENGLISH ................................................................................ 29 Researchers say jogging alone is unhealthy. ........................................................... 31 KATE MOSS: I WILL FACE POLICE .................................................................... 33 McParadox............................................................................................................... 35 SOPHIE AND EDWARD EXPECTING ROYAL BABY .................................... 37 Soldier admits guilt over Iraq photos ...................................................................... 38 RED PLANET RENAISSANCE ............................................................................ 40 WHY PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IS IMPORTANT FOR YOU ............................... 42 Unit 4. The Scientific Articles for Checking Practical Skills. .............................. 44 SPORT ..................................................................................................................... 44 NATURE ................................................................................................................. 56 HISTORY ................................................................................................................ 71 ART ......................................................................................................................... 76 REFERENCE LITERATURE ................................................................................. 87 4 INTRODUCTION Academic Writing : the Basics is a developmental research skills for students and postgraduates. It focuses on key structures and provides ample opportunities for practice through extensive and varied excersises. A characteristic feature of this manual is inclusion of ways of scientific writing, in particular, establishing the importance of topic, highlighting a problem, highlighting a controversy in the field of study, highlighting inadequacies of previous studies, highlighting knowledge gap in the field of studies, stating the purpouse of research, indicating significance, indicating limitations, outlining structure, explaining keywords. This manual also deals with such research aspects as research methods, describing characteristics of the sample, indicating reasons for sample characteristics, statements of positive result, statements of negative result, reporting reaction, statememts of result, unexpected outcome, commenting on findings, suggestions for future work. Provided texts are aimed at checking the level of grammar and lexicl competences formation. Newspaper articles are a tool for checking the level of development of working with scientific literature skills. We would like to express our gratitude to Shkolyarenko V. I., Bidyuk N. M.
Recommended publications
  • Olympic Rowing Regatta Beijing, China 9-17 August
    2008 Olympic Rowing Regatta Beijing, China 9-17 August MEDIA GUIDE TABLE OF CONTEnts 1. Introduction 3 2. FISA 5 2.1. What is FISA? 5 2.2. FISA contacts 6 3. Rowing at the Olympics 7 3.1. History 7 3.2. Olympic boat classes 7 3.3. How to Row 9 3.4. A Short Glossary of Rowing Terms 10 3.5. Key Rowing References 11 4. Olympic Rowing Regatta 2008 13 4.1. Olympic Qualified Boats 13 4.2. Olympic Competition Description 14 5. Athletes 16 5.1. Top 10 16 5.2. Olympic Profiles 18 6. Historical Results: Olympic Games 27 6.1. Olympic Games 1900-2004 27 7. Historical Results: World Rowing Championships 38 7.1. World Rowing Championships 2001-2003, 2005-2007 (current Olympic boat classes) 38 8. Historical Results: Rowing World Cup Results 2005-2008 44 8.1. Current Olympic boat classes 44 9. Statistics 54 9.1. Olympic Games 54 9.1.1. All Time NOC Medal Table 54 9.1.2. All Time Olympic Multi Medallists 55 9.1.3. All Time NOC Medal Table per event (current Olympic boat classes only) 58 9.2. World Rowing Championships 63 9.2.1. All Time NF Medal Table 63 9.2.2. All Time NF Medal Table per event 64 9.3. Rowing World Cup 2005-2008 70 9.3.1. Rowing World Cup Medal Tables per year 2005-2008 70 9.3.2. All Time Rowing World Cup Medal Tables per event 2005-2008 (current Olympic boat classes) 72 9.4.
    [Show full text]
  • Usrowing NSR III / 2010 Adaptive World Championship Trials 2010 Full Race Results
    USRowing NSR III / 2010 Adaptive World Championship Trials 2010 Full Race Results #1 Mens 2x Time-Trial 1 (All to 3 Heats) (07:00:00) Official Place Entry Raw Time Bow Penalties/HC Adjusted % 1 USRowing Training Center - Chula Vista (Elliot Hovey, Wes Piermarini) 06:10.1 13 06:10.1 2 Craftsbury Sculling Center A (Tom Graves, Peter Graves) 06:12.1 6 06:12.1 0.55 3 USRowing Training Center - Chula Vista (Will Miller, Scott Gault) 06:15.0 4 06:15.0 1.32 4 NYAC/PENNAC A (Stephen Whelpley, James Koven) 06:15.0 7 06:15.0 1.32 5 PENNAC/PBC A (Ross Anderson, William Cowles) 06:19.1 3 06:19.1 2.44 6 Penn A.C. Rowing Association A (Ryan Strauss, Christopher Metzger) 06:20.6 2 06:20.6 2.84 7 Potomac Boat Club B (Taylor Frank, Kevin Baum) 06:24.2 10 06:24.2 3.81 8 GMS Rowing Center A (Brian Deregt, Jonathan Winter) 06:26.0 9 06:26.0 4.28 9 Pocock Rowing Center (Austin Nichols, Zachary Ellison) 06:27.1 15 06:27.1 4.59 10 USRowing Training Center - Chula Vista/GMS (Michael Sivigny, Donny Simkin) 06:27.5 11 06:27.5 4.69 11 Penn A.C. Rowing Association B (Johan Quie, Vincent Lepeltier) 06:27.8 12 06:27.8 4.78 12 Stonington Rowing Club A (Harrison Macris, Joshua Novak) 06:32.9 8 06:32.9 6.15 13 USRowing Training Center - Princeton (Matt Kochem, Tom Paulett) 06:33.2 14 06:33.2 6.24 14 Vesper Boat Club A (Stephen Lambers, Matthew Brown) 06:38.7 5 06:38.7 7.74 - USRowing Training Center - OKC A (Martin Etem, Pat Close) 1 OK #2 Womens 2x Time-Trial 1 (All to Semi A/B) (07:00:00) Official Place Entry Raw Time Bow Penalties/HC Adjusted % 1 USRowing Training
    [Show full text]
  • Rowing DIVISION I
    DIVISION I Rowing DIVISION I 2007 TEAM RESULTS I EIGHTS II EIGHTS FOURS TOTAL 1. Brown.................................. 27 20 11 58 2. Virginia................................ 24 18 12 54 3. Ohio St................................ 33 16 3 52 4. Yale..................................... 36 8 7 51 5. Southern California............... 30 12 6 48 6. Minnesota............................ 18 24 5 47 7. California............................. 6 22 10 38 8. Princeton.............................. 21 4 9 34 9. Tennessee ............................ 15 10 4 29 10. Washington ......................... 3 14 8 25 11. Harvard ............................... 12 6 1 19 12. Notre Dame ......................... 9 2 2 13 Note: Ties in team scoring are broken by finish in I Eights. 2007 EVENT RESULTS II Eights: Petite final—1. Southern California [Anna I Eights: Third final—1. California, 6:47.40; 2. UCLA, Specjalska, Nana Gagatsovi, Anna Efremova, Bara 6:51.55; 3. Washington, 6:52.94; 4. UCF, 7:03.18. Fours: Petite final—1. Southern California [Laura Varekova, Phebe Greenwood, Kinga Marciszewska, McDaniel, Shelley Koskovich, Ewelina Nowak, Cassie I Eights: Petite final—1. Minnesota [Laura Jatautaite, ROWING Carin Andersson, Jessica Smith, Lisa Sabalvaro Cheryl Wick, Jennifer Barnes, Erika Bartkute, Vilma Richardson, Denise Kobashikawa (coxswain)], 7:44.06; (coxswain)], 6:58.34; 2. Tennessee, 6:59.30; 3. Yale, 2. Minnesota, 7:49.31; 3. Tennessee, 7:54.18; 4. Ohio Stragyte, Sally Olson, Berit Tomten, Jenna Buskohl, 7:01.10; 4. Harvard, 7:06.34; 5. Princeton, 7:11.15; 6. Megan Flannery (coxswain)], 6:43.53; 2. Dartmouth, St., 7:56.02; 5. Notre Dame, 7:56.34; 6. Harvard, Notre Dame, 7:16.16. 7:58.91.
    [Show full text]
  • 05 Crew Guide
    2005 CALIFORNIA CREW FACTS AND FIGURES Location: Berkeley, CA CONTENTS Enrollment: 33,000 (24,000 undergraduate) Facts and Figures ............................................................................ 1 Founded: 1868 Cal Crew Staff .............................................................................. 2-3 Nickname: Golden Bears 2005 Season Outlook ................................................................... 4-5 Colors: Blue and Gold 2005 Athlete Profiles ................................................................. 6-11 Conference: Pac-10 2005 Men’s Roster ....................................................................... 12 Crew Office: Strawberry Canyon Center University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720 2005 Women’s Roster .................................................................. 13 Boathouse: T. Gary Rodgers Boathouse 2004 Season In Review ............................................................ 14-15 2999 Glascock St., Oakland, CA 94601, (510) 261-4648 2004 Race Results......................................................................... 16 Chancellor: Dr. Robert Birgeneau 2004 Award Winners .................................................................... 17 Athletic Director: Sandy Barbour Academic Support......................................................................... 17 Men’s Head Coach: Stephen C. Gladstone – (510) 533-8931 History of Cal Crew ................................................................ 18-19 (17th year at Cal, 1973-80, ’97-current) Women’s Head
    [Show full text]
  • Rowing DIVISION I
    Rowing DIVISION I Highlights Virginia Rowing Wins Program’s First National Championship: Second-seeded Yale rowed to a start-to-fi nish I Eights victory and Virginia captured the team title on the fi nal day of the NCAA Division I Women’s Rowing Championships May 30 on Lake Natoma. Yale, which had the fastest semifi nal time, completed the 2,000 meters at the Sacramento State Aquatic Center in 6 minutes 24.76 seconds. Virginia (6:25.75) was second, followed by Princeton (6:27.06), California (6:27.60), Stanford (6:31.30) and Southern California (6:34.21). With its fourth place in II Eights, second in I Eights and dominating win in Fours, Virginia claimed the team title with 87 points. California fi nished second with 82, followed by Princeton with 76. Defending team titlist Stanford was fourth with 75. It is Virginia’s fi rst team title since the NCAA began the women’s championships in 1997. Despite heat and semifi nal winners both clocking 6:16 times, the I Eights fi nal, the concluding event of the three-day regatta, was about eight seconds slower. “We knew we had to get out to a fast start,” said Taylor Ritzel, Yale’s senior captain. “We knew Princeton would be right there, and if we could get out quick, then we just had to row our race.” Rowing into a headwind, Yale moved to the front, with the top four boats rarely changing positions and fi nishing less than three seconds apart. “It was very diff erent today; we defi - nitely felt the headwinds,” said Ritzel of the Bulldogs’ inside lane.
    [Show full text]
  • Pac-12 Women's Rowing
    PAC-12 WOMEN'S ROWING PAC-12 TEAM 6. OSU ...................(7:16.7) 5. USC ........................ 49.5 2002 (Lake Natoma, Calif.) 6. WSU ....................... 37.5 CHAMPIONS 1. WASH ........................ 66 7. UCLA ........................ 29 1987 WASH 1992 (Sacramento, Calif.) 2. CAL ............................ 58 8. ORE ............................. 2 1988 WASH 1. WASH ................(7:00.1) 3. OSU ........................... 52 1989 WASH 2. STAN .................(7:10.9) 4. WSU .......................... 51 2010 (Lake Natoma, Calif.) 1990 UCLA 3. CAL ....................(7:11.9) 5. STAN ......................... 44 1. CAL ..........................39.5 1991 UCLA 4. OSU ...................(7:28.8) 6. USC ........................... 37 2. STAN .......................39 1992 WASH 5. WSU ..................(7:35.5) 7. UCLA ......................... 31 3. WASH ......................31.5 1993 WASH 8. ORE ........................... 13 4. USC .........................24.5 1994 WASH 1993 (Sacramento, Calif.) 5. UCLA .......................22 1995 WASH 1. WASH ................(6:55.2) 2003 (Lake Natoma, Calif.) 6. WSU ........................17.5 1996 WASH 2. CAL ....................(7:07.7) 1. WASH ........................ 62 7. OSU ...........................8 1997 WASH 3. WSU ..................(7:21.5) 2. CAL ............................ 60 1998 WASH 4. STAN .................(7:30.5) 3. STAN ......................... 52 2011 (Lake Natoma, Calif.) 1999 WASH 5. OSU ...................(7:33.8) 4. WSU .......................... 52
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 2 20Th Century
    THE SPORT OF ROWING To the readers of www.row2k.com News concerning my four-volume book, The following .pdf is in the format in- now called The Sport of Rowing, Two Cen- tended for the final printed book. It is from turies of Competition, is coming thick and the fourth of four volumes. fast as the October, 2011 publishing date gets closer. I am now taking reservations I need you! for the hard-bound limited collector’s edi- tion. If you find any typos in this chapter, or Unlike the soft-bound regular edition if you have any questions, comments, sug- with its black & white images, the collector gestions, corrections, agreements, disagree- edition will feature full-color illustrations ments, additional sources or illustrations, if like you see in these row2k excerpts, and you would like to add your own perspective, each copy will be consecutively numbered, etc. please email me at the address below. signed and dedicated by me according to the Your input represents an essential contribu- instructions of the purchaser. tion to what has always been intended to be Each person who pre-purchases a collec- a joint project of the rowing community, so tor copy prior to publication will be listed as please contribute. If you and I end up final- a subscriber in both editions. I encourage ly disagreeing on some relevant point or everyone to visit www.rowingevolution.com, other, I will be thrilled to present both alter- read the blog and sign up for the newsletter. natives so the readers can decide for them- Those who wish to reserve a low number for selves.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Results Here!
    USRowing Spring NSR II / Speed Order 2010 Full Race Results #1 Mens 2x (07:00:00) Official Place Entry 1000 M Raw Time Bow Penalties/HC Adjusted % 1 USRowing Training Center - Princeton (Warren Anderson, Glenn OcHal) 06:13.8 11 06:13.8 2 USRowing Training Center - CHula Vista (Scott Gault, Will Miller) 06:18.1 10 06:18.1 1.16 3 NYAC/GMS (Jamie Koven, MicHael Sivigny) 06:18.8 4 06:18.8 1.36 4 Craftsbury Sculling Center (THomas Graves, Peter Graves) 06:21.3 13 06:21.3 2.02 5 Penn A.C./GMS (StepHen WHelpley, Joe Spencer) 06:21.8 9 06:21.8 2.16 6 USRowing Training Center - CHula Vista (Elliot Hovey, Wes Piermarini) 06:23.4 8 06:23.4 2.58 7 USRowing Training Center - CHula Vista/Penn A.C. (CHristopHer De Felice, Donny Simkin) 06:24.6 7 06:24.6 2.9 8 Penn A.C./Vesper (Ross Anderson, Matthew Brown) 06:24.9 1 06:24.9 2.99 9 Pocock/Potomac Boat Club (Taylor Frank, William Cowles) 06:28.2 2 06:28.2 3.87 10 Undine/Penn A.C. (CHarles Biddle, CHris Lambert) 06:30.7 12 06:30.7 4.54 11 Penn A.C. Rowing Association (Ryan Strauss, CHris Metzger) 06:32.7 3 06:32.7 5.07 12 Penn A.C./GMS (Eric ScHwirtz, Spencer Crim) 06:34.7 6 06:34.7 5.6 13 Potomac Boat Club (Brendan Mcewan, MicHael Malone) 06:40.4 5 06:40.4 7.14 #2 Womens 2x (07:00:00) Official Place Entry 1000 M Raw Time Bow Penalties/HC Adjusted % 1 USRowing Training Center - Princeton (Kathleen Bertko, StesHa Carle) 06:55.7 21 06:55.7 2 USRowing Training Center - Princeton (Megan Kalmoe, Jessica Reel) 06:59.0 18 06:59.0 0.8 3 USRowing Training Center - Princeton (Meg WalsH, Sarah Trowbridge) 06:59.1 20 06:59.1 0.82 4 Potomac/Penn A.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Rowing DIVISION I
    Rowing DIVISION I 2009 TEAM RESULTS I Eights II Eights Fours Total 1. Stanford ................................................................48 28 12 88 2. California ..............................................................42 30 13 85 3. Yale .........................................................................39 32 14 85 4. Virginia ..................................................................45 22 11 78 5. Brown ....................................................................36 26 9 71 6. Michigan St. ........................................................30 20 4 54 7. Washington ........................................................18 24 8 50 8. Ohio St. .................................................................21 18 10 49 9. Michigan ..............................................................27 14 7 48 10. Princeton ..............................................................33 10 3 46 11. Southern California .........................................24 16 6 46 12. Clemson ...............................................................15 12 16 43 13. Wisconsin ................................................................3 8 15 26 14. Harvard .................................................................12 4 5 21 15. Oregon St................................................................6 6 2 14 16. Dartmouth .............................................................9 2 1 12 Note: Ties in team scoring are broken by finish in I Eights. 2009 EVENT RESULTS II Eights: Third final—1. Wisconsin,
    [Show full text]
  • Full Race Results
    Full Race Results http://secure.powerhousetiming.com/powerhouse/webpages/staticRa... Quick Links ... Home My Racing Schedule of Events Finishline Pictures Complete Race Results > USRowing Spring NSR I / Speed Order 2010 #1 M1x Time Trial (07:00:00) Official Place Entry Raw Time Bow Penalties/HC Adjusted % USRowing Training Center A (Warren 1 06:38.919 32 06:38.919 Anderson) 2 Unaffiliated C (Ken Jurkowski) 06:44.460 6 06:44.460 1.39 3 Penn AC L (Stephen Whelpley) 06:45.686 23 06:45.686 1.7 USRowing Training Center B (Glenn 4 06:47.659 31 06:47.659 2.19 Ochal) Craftsbury Sculling Center (Thomas 5 06:48.471 2 06:48.471 2.39 Graves) New York Athletic Club B (Matthew 6 06:50.199 14 06:50.199 2.83 Hughes) USRowing Training Center C (Donny 7 06:50.855 5 06:50.855 2.99 Simkin) 8 Penn AC J (Joe Spencer) 06:51.106 30 06:51.106 3.06 USRowing Training Center - OKC B 9 06:51.390 4 06:51.390 3.13 (Ryan Monaghan) New York Athletic Club C (Jamie 10 06:51.456 25 06:51.456 3.14 Koven) USRowing Training Center - OKC A 11 06:51.582 16 06:51.582 3.17 (Pat Close) 12 Vesper Boat Club A (Matthew Brown)06:51.611 3 06:51.611 3.18 13 Penn AC G (Joshua Novak) 06:52.180 28 06:52.180 3.32 Pocock Rowing Center B (James 14 06:52.493 29 06:52.493 3.4 Dietz Ii) 15 Penn AC A (Ross Anderson) 06:52.692 35 06:52.692 3.45 GMS Rowing Center (Michael 16 06:52.791 36 06:52.791 3.48 Sivigny) 17 Penn AC D (Christopher Defelice) 06:53.749 34 06:53.749 3.72 Texas Rowing Center (Zachary 18 06:53.993 18 06:53.993 3.78 Ellison) Pocock Rowing Center A (William 19 06:56.166 17 06:56.166
    [Show full text]
  • Class of 2014 Induction Ceremony
    Class of 2014 Induction Ceremony May 31, 2014 Princeton New Jersey May 31, 2014 OUR MISSION Dear Friends of Rowing: It is an honor to welcome you to the National Rowing Hall of Fame Induction The NRF is a tax-exempt 501©3 not for profit organization dedicated Ceremony, honoring the Class of 2014. Tonight we will celebrate seventeen to raising funds to support the U.S. National Rowing Teams. Founded individuals who’s accomplishments have earned them membership into the in 1966, the NRF has been supporting World and Olympic athletes for National Rowing Hall of Fame. more than four decades. The funds raised support year round training, development, competition and preservation of the of rowing history The National Rowing Hall of Fame has been honoring rowers for over 50 through the National Rowing Hall of Fame and the Rowing Museum. years, and the National Rowing Foundation (NRF) has been the shepherd of the Hall of Fame for more than 30 years. Tonight, however is only the third For more information about the NRF visit www.natrowing.org. time that the NRF has had a stand-alone induction ceremony to welcome the new class of inductees into the Hall of Fame. We hope this is a tradition that will continue as our National Team athletes, and coaches strive to achieve great results. Please enjoy yourselves tonight as we honor and celebrate the Class of 2014! Congratulations and Best Wishes, Charles B. Hamlin Executive Director May 31, 2014 Dear Inductees, Guests and Friends of Rowing: It is with great pleasure that the United States Rowing Association joins in NATIONAL ROWING celebrating the accomplishments of these national team alumni and fellow athletes as they are inducted into the 2014 Class of the National Rowing HALL OF FAME Foundation Hall of Fame.
    [Show full text]
  • 2012 Golden Bears Women's Crew Record Book
    2011 VARSITY 4+ NCAA CHAMPIONS 2012 GOLDEN BEARS WOMEN’S CREW RECORD BOOK 2012 CALIFORNIA WOMEN’S CREW QUICK FACTS TABLE OF CONTENTS Location: Berkeley, Calif. Quick Facts/2012 Schedule......................1 Founded: 1868 Roster .......................................................2 Enrollment: 35,838 2011 Race Results ...................................3 Nickname: Golden Bears History ......................................................4 Mascot: Oski Cal Honors................................................5 Colors: Blue (282) and Gold (123) Cal Cup Results/Championships ..............6 Affiliation: NCAA Division 1 International Bears ...................................7 Conference: Pac-12 Chancellor: Dr. Robert J Birgeneau COACHING SUMMARY Athletic Director: Sandy Barbour Official Cal Athletics Web Site: www.CalBears.com Year Varsity Coaches Cal Crew Web Site: www.CalCrew.com 1975-79 ...........Daig O’Connell, Cal ’72 1980-86 .......................... Pat Sweeney, Thames Tradesmen TEAM INFORMATION 1987 ................... Ted Swinford, Cal ’83 2011 NCAA Championships Finish: 3rd 1988-93 ......................John Squadroni, 2011 Pac-10 Championships Finish: 1st Washington ’84 1994-97 ........Anna Considine, Warsaw Physical Academy ’80 COACHING STAFF 1998 ........... Marisa Hurtado, UCLA ’89 Head Coach: Dave O’Neill (14th year, Boston College ’91) 1999-Present .................. Dave O’Neill, Office Phone: (510) 642-9414; Email: [email protected] Boston College ’91 Office: Strawberry Canyon Center, University of California,
    [Show full text]