Chondroitin Sulphate Enhances the Antitumor Activity of Gemcitabine and Mitomycin-C in Bladder Cancer Cells with Different Mechanisms

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Chondroitin Sulphate Enhances the Antitumor Activity of Gemcitabine and Mitomycin-C in Bladder Cancer Cells with Different Mechanisms ONCOLOGY REPORTS 27: 409-415, 2012 Chondroitin sulphate enhances the antitumor activity of gemcitabine and mitomycin-C in bladder cancer cells with different mechanisms MATTEO FERRO1, GAIA GIUBERTI2, SILVIA ZAPPAVIGNA2, SISTO PERDONÀ3, GAETANO FACCHINI3, PASQUALE SPERLONGANO4, STEFANIA PORTO2, GIUSEPPE DI LORENZO5, CARLO BUONERBA5, ALBERTO ABBRUZZESE2, VINCENZO ALTIERI1 and MICHELE CARAGLIA2 1Department of Urology, University Federico II; 2Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Second University of Naples; 3Urogynecological Department, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Fondazione ‘G. Pascale’; 4Department of Anaesthesiological, Surgical and Emergency Sciences, Second University of Naples; 5Department of Endocrinology and Medical Oncology, Genitourinary Cancer Section, University Federico II, Naples, Italy Received July 22, 2011; Accepted September 9, 2011 DOI: 10.3892/or.2011.1526 Abstract. Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is the most combination induced a strong potentiation of apoptosis with common type of bladder cancer in Western countries. The the consequent activation of caspases 9 and 3. On the other glycosaminoglycan (GAG) layer at the bladder surface hand, HT-1376 cells were necrotic if exposed to the CS/MMC non-specifically blocks the adherence of bacteria, ions and combination and no signs of caspase activation was observed. molecules to the bladder epithelium and bladder cancer In conclusion, in the human bladder cancer cell line HT-1376 cells express CD44 that binds GAG. Currently, there are pharmacological combination of CS with GEM or MMC few options other than cystectomy for the management of resulted in a strong synergism on cell growth inhibition. non-muscle invasive bladder cancer with intravesical chemo- therapy using several drugs such as gemcitabine (GEM) Introduction and mitomycin-C (MMC) with poor prophylactic activity. In this study, we investigated the effects of the GAG chon- Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer is the most common type droitin sulphate (CS) on the growth inhibition of human of bladder cancer in Western countries. There are multiple risk bladder cancer cell lines HT-1376 and effects of the combi- factors for bladder cancer, which include exposure to tobacco nation between GEM or MMC with CS. We have found that and industrial chemicals, ingestion of arsenic-laced water, CS, MMC and GEM induced 50% growth inhibition at 72 h. radiation therapy to organs adjacent to the bladder, therapeutic Therefore, we have evaluated the growth inhibition induced use of alkylating agents in chemotherapy regimens, and by different concentration of CS in combination with MMC infection with the trematode Schistosoma haematobium. The or GEM, respectively, at 72 h. We have observed, at Calcusyn glycosaminoglycan layer at the bladder surface non-specifi- analysis, a synergism when HT-1376 cells were treated with cally blocks the adherence of bacteria, ions and molecules CS in combination with MMC or GEM, respectively, if used to the epithelium. Therefore, it may be an important element at an equimolar ratio. We have also found that CS/GEM in the first line of defence against infection, calculi and even carcinogens for the transitional cells of the bladder. Qualitative or quantitative defects in the glycosaminoglycan(s) expression may influence an individual's susceptibility to the development of bladder tumors (1-3). Correspondence to: Dr Michele Caraglia or Dr Alberto Abbruzzese, At initial presentation 70% of bladder cancers are superfi- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Second University of cial and include carcinoma in situ (CIS), Ta, and T1 disease. Naples, Via Costantinopoli 16, I-80138 Naples, Italy Transurethral resection (TUR) is the primary mode of clinical E-mail: [email protected] management for both diagnosis and treatment of superficial E-mail: [email protected] bladder cancer, but 60 to 70% of these cancers recur and 20% Abbreviations: BCG, Bacille Calmette-Guèrin; CIS, carcinoma in situ; progress to a higher stage (4). TUR is commonly followed by CS, chondroitin sulphate; GEM, gemcitabine; MMC, mitomycin-C; intravesical infusion of either chemotherapy or immune-modu- TUR, transurethral resection lating agents in order to reduce the incidence of recurrence and progression. Bacille Calmette-Guèrin (BCG) is the most Key words: bladder cancer, chondroitin sulphate, gemcitabine, effective agent in the prevention of recurrence resulting in a mitomycin-C, HT-1376 decrease in the rate of progression; however, only one third of patients respond to BCG an effect that can induce a range 410 FERRO et al: CHONDROITIN SULPHATE ENHANCES ANTITUMOR ACTIVITY of adverse effects from mild dysuria to systemic tuberculosis 100 µg/ml streptomycin, 1% L-glutamine and 1% sodium (5). Several conventional cytotoxic agents have been used pyruvate. The cells were grown in a humidified atmosphere of for prophylaxis of recurrences after resection (6). Adjuvant 95% air/5% CO2 at 37˚C. intravesical infusion in recurrent tumors with chemotherapy or immunotherapy is not yet clearly established. Patients Drug combination studies. For the study of the synergism in whom BCG fails are a challenge for both urologists and between CS and MMC or GEM on growth inhibition of oncologists, with the need for careful individualization of HT-1376 cells, the cells were seeded in 96-multiwell plates at therapy in experienced hands. Among the compounds used the density of 5x103 cells/well. After 24 h incubation at 37˚C in intravesical therapy, mitomycin C (MMC) is one of the the cells were treated with different concentrations of CS or most common. This anti-tumor antibiotic, according to the GEM or MMC and their combinations. Drug combination manufacturer's labeling, is indicated in intravesical infusion at studies were based on concentration-effect curves generated the dose of 40 mg (7). The European Urological Association as a plot of the fraction of unaffected (surviving) cells vs. drug guidelines recommend 20 to 40 mg as the standard dose of concentration after 72 h of treatment. Assessment of synergy MMC (7). MMC has been shown to be active in treating super- was performed quantitating drug interaction by the Calcusyn ficial bladder cancer, and given in multiple infusions produces computer program (Biosoft, Ferguson, MO). Combination response rates ranging between 40 and 50% (8). MMC is, at the index (CI) values of <1, 1, and >1 indicate synergy, additivity, present, one of the standard chemotherapy agents in the treat- and antagonism, respectively (15). Furthermore, we analyzed ment of superficial bladder cancer (9). In two recent studies, the specific contribution of CS, GEM and MMC on the cyto- MMC was compared with BCG showing a slightly decreased toxic effect of the combination by calculating the potentiation activity in the treatment of the disease and prevention of factor (PF), defined as the ratio of the IC50 of either CS or GEM recurrence (10,11). Multiple infusions of MMC, however, are or MMC alone to the IC50 of CS/GEM or CS/MMC combina- associated with an increased incidence of side effects (12). In tions, respectively, as described before; a higher PF indicates a fact, chemical cystitis and allergic reactions are quite common greater cytotoxicity. and disappear after cessation of therapy. The new pyrimidine analogue gemcitabine (GEM) exhibits anti-tumor activity Flow cytometric analysis of apoptosis. Annexin V-FITC against a variety of solid tumors including advanced bladder (fluorescein isothiocyanate) was used in conjunction with cancer. In fact, it is active and well-tolerated when used in a vital dye, propidium iodide (PI), to distinguish apoptotic the treatment of metastatic bladder cancer (13). The proven (Annexin V-FITC positive, PI negative) from necrotic efficacy of systemic therapy against advanced bladder cancer (Annexin V-FITC positive, PI positive) cells. Briefly, cells were led urologists to consider GEM as a potential new agent for the incubated with Annexin V-FITC (MedSystems Diagnostics) treatment of superficial transitional cell carcinoma by intra- and propidium iodide (Sigma) in a binding buffer (10 mM vesical administration (14). Recently, we have demonstrated HEPES, pH 7.4, 150 mM NaCl, 5 mM KCl, 1 mM MgCl2, that GEM has better efficacy and lower toxicity than MMC in 2.5 mM CaCl2) for 10 min at room temperature, washed and a phase III randomized clinical trial in the prevention of the resuspended in the same buffer. Analysis of apoptotic cells was recurrence of superficial bladder cancer and correlates with performed by flow cytometry (FACScan, Becton-Dickinson). significantly lower side effects. For each sample, 2x104 events were acquired. Analysis was In this study, we investigated the effects of chondroitin carried out by triplicate determination on at least three separate sulphate (CS) (3) on the growth inhibition of human bladder experiments. cancer cell line HT-1376 and effects of the combination between GEM and MMC with chondroitin sulphate on the Western blot analysis. HT-1376 cells were grown for 48 h antitumor activity of these drugs in vitro. with or without CS and/or GEM or CS and/or MMC at 37˚C. For cell extract preparation, the cells were washed twice with Materials and methods ice-cold PBS/BSA, scraped, and centrifuged for 30 min at 4˚C in 1 ml of lysis buffer (1% Triton, 0.5% sodium deoxy- Materials. DMEM, BSA and FBS were purchased from Flow cholate, 0.1 M NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, pH 7.5, 10 mM Na2HPO4, Laboratories (Milan, Italy). Tissue culture plasticware was pH 7.4, 10 mM PMSF, 25 mM benzamidine, 1 mM leupeptin, from Becton-Dickinson (Lincoln Park, NJ, USA). Chondroitin 0.025 U/ml aprotinin). Equal amounts of cell proteins were sulphate (Uracyst®) was a gift of Stellar Pharmaceuticals, separated by SDS-PAGE, electrotransferred to nitrocellulose Inc., Gemcitabine (Gemzar®) was a gift of Lilly, mitomycin-C and reacted with the different antibodies. Blots were then was a gift of Kyowa Hakko Kirin. Caspase-3 Mab (31A1067) developed using enhanced chemiluminescence detection and caspase-9 pAb were purchased from Enzo Life Sciences. reagents (SuperSignal West Pico, Pierce) and exposed to X-ray Anti caspase-6 human Mab was purchased from Alexis.
Recommended publications
  • Hodgkin Lymphoma Treatment Regimens
    HODGKIN LYMPHOMA TREATMENT REGIMENS (Part 1 of 5) Clinical Trials: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network recommends cancer patient participation in clinical trials as the gold standard for treatment. Cancer therapy selection, dosing, administration, and the management of related adverse events can be a complex process that should be handled by an experienced health care team. Clinicians must choose and verify treatment options based on the individual patient; drug dose modifications and supportive care interventions should be administered accordingly. The cancer treatment regimens below may include both U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved and unapproved indications/regimens. These regimens are provided only to supplement the latest treatment strategies. These Guidelines are a work in progress that may be refined as often as new significant data become available. The NCCN Guidelines® are a consensus statement of its authors regarding their views of currently accepted approaches to treatment. Any clinician seeking to apply or consult any NCCN Guidelines® is expected to use independent medical judgment in the context of individual clinical circumstances to determine any patient’s care or treatment. The NCCN makes no warranties of any kind whatsoever regarding their content, use, or application and disclaims any responsibility for their application or use in any way. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma1 Note: All recommendations are Category 2A unless otherwise indicated. Primary Treatment Stage IA, IIA Favorable (No Bulky Disease, <3 Sites of Disease, ESR <50, and No E-lesions) REGIMEN DOSING Doxorubicin + Bleomycin + Days 1 and 15: Doxorubicin 25mg/m2 IV push + bleomycin 10units/m2 IV push + Vinblastine + Dacarbazine vinblastine 6mg/m2 IV over 5–10 minutes + dacarbazine 375mg/m2 IV over (ABVD) (Category 1)2-5 60 minutes.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phase I Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Gemcitabine Given Biweekly with B-Vitamin Support in Solid Tumor Malignancies Or Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Martee L
    Cancer Therapy: Clinical A Phase I Trial of Pemetrexed Plus Gemcitabine Given Biweekly with B-Vitamin Support in Solid Tumor Malignancies or Advanced Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Martee L. Hensley,1Joseph Larkin,1Matthew Fury,1Scott Gerst,1D. Fritz Tai,2 Paul Sabbatini,1 Jason Konner,1Mauro Orlando,2 Tiana L. Goss,2 and Carol A. Aghajanian1 Abstract Purpose: To determine the maximally tolerated dose (MTD) of biweekly pemetrexed with gemcitabine plus B12 and folate supplementation in patients with advanced solid tumors and ovarian cancer. Experimental Design: Patients with no prior pemetrexed or gemcitabine therapy enrolled in cohorts of three, expanding to six if dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed. Pemetrexed, escalated from to 700 mg/m2, was given before gemcitabine 1,500 mg/m2 every 14 days. DLTs were grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days or febrile neutropenia, grade 4 or 3 thrombocytopenia (with bleeding), grade z3 nonhematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of z1 week due to unresolved toxicity. Results: The ovarian cancer cohort enrolled 24 patients with unlimited prior cytotoxic chemo- therapies. MTD was observed at pemetrexed 600 mg/m2, with 2 of 9 patients experiencing DLT. Most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities per patient were neutropenia (83%), leukopenia (67%), lymphopenia (73%), and febrile neutropenia (12%). Median cycle per patient was 8 (range, 1-16). Six of 21 (28%) patients had confirmed partial responses. Study protocol was modified for the solid tumor cohort (n = 30) to enroll patients with two or more prior cytotoxic regimens. MTD was observed at pemetrexed 500 mg/m2, with 1of 9 patients experiencing DLT.
    [Show full text]
  • GEMCITABINE Hcl) for INJECTION
    FDA REVISED LABEL – VERSION 082598 Page 1 PA 1634 AMP GEMZAR® (GEMCITABINE HCl) FOR INJECTION DESCRIPTION Gemzar® (gemcitabine HCl) is a nucleoside analogue that exhibits antitumor activity. Gemcitabine HCl is 2'-deoxy-2',2'-difluorocytidine monohydrochloride (ß-isomer). The structural formula is as follows: NH 2•HCl N HO N O O F H OH F The empirical formula for gemcitabine HCl is C9H11F2N3O4 • HCl. It has a molecular weight of 299.66. Gemcitabine HCl is a white to off-white solid. It is soluble in water, slightly soluble in methanol, and practically insoluble in ethanol and polar organic solvents. The clinical formulation is supplied in a sterile form for intravenous use only. Vials of Gemzar contain either 200 mg or 1 g of gemcitabine HCl (expressed as free base) formulated with mannitol (200 mg or 1 g, respectively) and sodium acetate (12.5 mg or 62.5 mg, respectively) as a sterile lyophilized powder. Hydrochloric acid and/or sodium hydroxide may have been added for pH adjustment. CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY Gemcitabine exhibits cell phase specificity, primarily killing cells undergoing DNA synthesis (S-phase) and also blocking the progression of cells through the G1/S-phase boundary. Gemcitabine is metabolized intracellularly by nucleoside kinases to the active diphosphate (dFdCDP) and triphosphate (dFdCTP) nucleosides. The cytotoxic effect of gemcitabine is attributed to a combination of two actions of the diphosphate and the triphosphate nucleosides, which leads to inhibition of DNA synthesis. First, gemcitabine diphosphate inhibits ribonucleotide reductase, which is responsible for catalyzing the reactions that generate the deoxynucleoside triphosphates for DNA synthesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Intravesical Administration of Therapeutic Medication for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer Jointly Developed with the Society of Urologic Nurses and Associates (SUNA)
    Intravesical Administration of Therapeutic Medication for the Treatment of Bladder Cancer Jointly developed with the Society of Urologic Nurses and Associates (SUNA) Revised: June 2020 Workgroup Members: AUA: Roxy Baumgartner, RN, APN-BC; Sam Chang, MD; Susan Flick, CNP; Howard Goldman, MD, FACS; Jim Kovarik, MS, PA-C; Yair Lotan, MD; Elspeth McDougall, MD, FRCSC, MHPE; Arthur Sagalowsky, MD; Edouard Trabulsi, MD SUNA: Debbie Hensley, RN; Christy Krieg, MSN, CUNP; Leanne Schimke, MSN, CUNP I. Statement of Purpose: To define the performance guidance surrounding the instillation of intravesical cytotoxic, immunotherapeutic, and/or therapeutic drugs via sterile technique catheterization for patients with non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC, urothelial carcinoma). II. Population: Adult Urology III. Definition: Intravesical therapy involves instillation of a therapeutic agent directly into the bladder via insertion of a urethral catheter. IV. Indications: For administration of medication directly into the bladder via catheterization utilizing sterile technique for NMIBC treatment. V. Guidelines and Principles: Health care personnel (MD, NP, PA, RN, LPN, or MA) performing intravesical therapy must be educated, demonstrate competency, and understand the implications of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. (Scope of practice for health care personnel listed may vary based on state or institution). This should include associated health and safety issues regarding handling of cytotoxic, and immunotherapeutic agents; and documented competency of safe practical skills. At a minimum, each institution or office practice setting should implement an established, annual competency program to review safety work practices and guidelines regarding storage, receiving, handling/ transportation, administration, disposal, and handling a spill of hazardous drugs. (Mellinger, 2010) VI.
    [Show full text]
  • Cytostatics in Dutch Surface Water: Use, Presence and Risks To
    Cytostatics in Dutch surface water Use, presence and risks to the aquatic environment RIVM Letter report 2018-0067 C. Moermond et al. Cytostatics in Dutch surface water Use, presence and risks to the aquatic environment RIVM Letter report 2018-0067 C. Moermond et al. RIVM Letter report 2018-0067 Colophon © RIVM 2018 Parts of this publication may be reproduced, provided acknowledgement is given to: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, along with the title and year of publication. DOI 10.21945/RIVM-2018-0067 C. Moermond (auteur/coördinator), RIVM B. Venhuis (auteur/coördinator),RIVM M. van Elk (auteur), RIVM A. Oostlander (auteur), RIVM P. van Vlaardingen (auteur), RIVM M. Marinković (auteur), RIVM J. van Dijk (stagiair; auteur) RIVM Contact: Caroline Moermond VSP-MSP [email protected] This investigation has been performed by order and for the account of the Ministry of Infrastructure and Water management (IenW), within the framework of Green Deal Zorg en Ketenaanpak medicijnresten uit water. This is a publication of: National Institute for Public Health and the Environment P.O. Box 1 | 3720 BA Bilthoven The Netherlands www.rivm.nl/en Page 2 of 140 RIVM Letter report 2018-0067 Synopsis Cytostatics in Dutch surface water Cytostatics are important medicines to treat cancer patients. Via urine, cytostatic residues end up in waste water that is treated in waste water treatment plants and subsequently discharged into surface waters. Research from RIVM shows that for most cytostatics, their residues do not pose a risk to the environment. They are sufficiently metabolised in the human body and removed in waste water treatment plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Intravesical Gemcitabine Versus Mitomycin for Non-Muscle Invasive
    Li et al. BMC Urology (2020) 20:97 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00610-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Intravesical gemcitabine versus mitomycin for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial Rongxin Li1†,YeLi1†, Jun Song1,2†, Ke Gao1, Kangning Chen1, Xiaogang Yang1, Yongqiang Ding1, Xinlong Ma1, Yang Wang1, Weipeng Li1, Yanan Wang1, Zhiping Wang1 and Zhilong Dong1* Abstract Background: Mitomycin (MMC) has been frequently used as the compound for intravesical treatment. The relatively new pyrimidine analog gemcitabine (GEM) has exhibited anticancer effect on various solid cancers, such as the advanced bladder cancer. In this study, the GEM and MMC in treating non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) cases was compared through systemic review. Methods: In accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement, the electronic databases, including Embase, PubMed, Chinese biomedicine literature database, the Cochrane Library, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence, NHS Evidence, Chinese technological periodical full-text database, and Chinese periodical full-text database, were systemically reviewed from inception to October 2018. Then, the RevMan 5.0 software was applied for data analysis. Five randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 335 patients were included. Results: For MMC group, the recurrence rate in the mitomycin arm increased compared with that in GEM group (OR = 0.44 95% CI [0.24, 0.78]), and the difference was statistically significant between the two groups. GEM was associated with reduced incidence of chemical cystitis compared with that of MMC (OR = 0.23 95% CI [0.12, 0.44]).
    [Show full text]
  • Gemcitabine for Injection Should Be 5.2 Hematology Patients
    HIGHLIGHTS OF PRESCRIBING INFORMATION In general, for severe (Grade 3 or 4) non-hematological toxicity, except nausea/vomiting, therapy with Gemcitabine for Injection should be 5.2 Hematology patients. The incidence of sepsis was less than 1%. Petechiae or mild blood loss (hemorrhage), from any cause, was reported in 16% of Renal held or decreased by 50% depending on the judgment of the treating physician. For carboplatin dosage adjustment, see manufacturer’s Gemcitabine for Injection can suppress bone marrow function as manifested by leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia [see Adverse patients; less than 1% of patients required platelet transfusions. Patients should be monitored for myelosuppression during Gemcitabine These highlights do not include all the information needed to use Gemcitabine for Injection safely and effectively. See full Proteinuria 23 0 0 18 0 0 prescribing information for Gemcitabine for Injection. prescribing information. Reactions (6.1)], and myelosuppression is usually the dose-limiting toxicity. Patients should be monitored for myelosuppression during for Injection therapy and dosage modified or suspended according to the degree of hematologic toxicity. [see Dosage and Administration Hematuria 15 0 0 13 0 0 therapy. [see Dosage and Administration (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4)] (2.1, 2.2, 2.3, and 2.4)] Creatinine 38 4 <1 31 2 <1 Dose adjustment for Gemcitabine for Injection in combination with carboplatin for subsequent cycles is based upon observed toxicity. Gemcitabine for Injection, Powder, Lyophilized, For Solution For Intravenous Use The dose of Gemcitabine for Injection in subsequent cycles should be reduced to 800 mg/m2 on Days 1 and 8 in case of any of the 5.3 Pulmonary Gastrointestinal - Nausea and vomiting were commonly reported (69%) but were usually of mild to moderate severity.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination Treatment with Arsenic Trioxide and Sulindac Augments
    1401-1408 26/4/06 12:23 Page 1401 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 28: 1401-1408, 2006 Combination treatment with arsenic trioxide and sulindac augments their apoptotic potential in lung cancer cells through activation of caspase cascade and mitochondrial dysfunction HAK-RYUL KIM1, EUN-JUNG KIM2, SEI-HOON YANG1, EUN-TAIK JEONG1, CHANNY PARK2, SE-JIN KIM2, MYUNG-JA YOUN2, HONG-SEOB SO2 and RAEKIL PARK2 Departments of 1Internal Medicine and 2Microbiology, Wonkwang University, School of Medicine, 344-2 Shinyong-dong Iksan, Jeonbuk 570-749, South Korea Received January 10, 2006; Accepted March 2, 2006 Abstract. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase, and Bevacizumab, a are known to enhance the responsiveness of tumor cells monoclonal antibody directed against vascular endothelial toward chemotherapeutic drugs and radiation. However, the growth factor, were clinically tried with chemotherapy precise mechanism of synergistic enhancement in tumoricidal regimens to treat lung cancer patients. However, these activity is not clearly known. Herein, we demonstrate that the combination therapies did not have improved efficacy over combination treatment of arsenic trioxide (As2O3) and sulindac chemotherapy regimens alone (3,4). resulted in a synergistic augmentation of cytotoxicity toward Arsenic trioxide has long been used as an anticancer agent NCI-H157 lung cancer cells, which was revealed as apoptosis in traditional Chinese medicine (5) and is currently used in accompanied by chromatin fragmentation and an increase in the treatment of refractory and relapsed acute promyelocytic sub-G0/G1 fraction. In addition, combination treatment with leukemia (APL) without severe marrow suppression (6). Some investigators have reported that As O induces apoptosis in a As2O3 and sulindac increased the catalytic activity of caspase-3, 2 3 -8, and -9 along with induction of Fas/FasL expression and variety of human solid tumor cell lines, including carcinomas cytosolic release of cytochrome c.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemotherapy Regimens for Lymphoma
    Helpline freephone 0808 808 5555 [email protected] www.lymphoma-action.org.uk Chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma Chemotherapy drugs for lymphoma are usually given as a ‘regimen’, a treatment plan that includes more than one type of drug. We have separate information about how chemotherapy works, the ways it’s given and its possible side effects. On this page What is a chemotherapy regimen? Why is chemotherapy given as a regimen? Common chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma Frequently asked questions What is a chemotherapy regimen? A chemotherapy regimen is a treatment plan that usually involves more than one drug. The regimen sets out: • the name of the drugs • the dose of each drug • how often you take the drugs • how the drugs are given • how long you take each drug for. Most regimens are given as a block of chemotherapy followed by a rest period to allow your body to recover. This is known as a ‘cycle’. Cycles often last between 2 and 4 weeks. A whole course of treatment can vary from several weeks to a number of months. Why is chemotherapy given as a regimen? Some chemotherapy drugs are given on their own. Examples include pixantrone and bendamustine. Often, however, a combination of chemotherapy drugs are given to treat lymphoma. Each drug works in a slightly different way to kill the lymphoma cells. For some types of lymphoma, this might mean that the drugs are able to kill more of the lymphoma than if you have them alone. You might be interested in our animation video that explains how chemotherapy works.
    [Show full text]
  • Gemcitabine-Containing Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Myxofibrosarcoma Refractory to Doxorubicin: a Case Series
    Brief Report Gemcitabine-Containing Chemotherapy for the Treatment of Metastatic Myxofibrosarcoma Refractory to Doxorubicin: A Case Series 1, 2, 1,2, Arielle Elkrief y, Suzanne Kazandjian y and Thierry Alcindor * 1 Cedars Cancer Center, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; [email protected] 2 Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC H4A 3J1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] These authors contributed equally to this paper. y Received: 7 December 2020; Accepted: 3 February 2021; Published: 5 February 2021 Abstract: Background: Myxofibrosarcoma is a type of soft-tissue sarcoma that is associated with high rates of local recurrence and distant metastases. The first-line treatment for metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma has conventionally been doxorubicin-based. Recent evidence suggests that myxofibrosarcoma may be molecularly similar to undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), which is particularly sensitive to gemcitabine-based therapy. The goal of this study was to evaluate the activity of gemcitabine-containing regimens for the treatment of metastatic myxofibrosarcoma refractory to doxorubicin. Material and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated seven consecutive cases of metastatic myxofibrosarcoma at our institution treated with gemcitabine-based therapy in the second-line setting, after progression on doxorubicin. Baseline clinical and baseline characteristics were collected. Primary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: After progression on first-line doxorubicin, a partial, or complete radiological response was observed in four of seven patients who received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy. With a median follow-up of 14 months, median progression-free and overall survival were 8.5 months and 11.4 months, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Screening of Conditionally Reprogrammed Patient-Derived Carcinoma Cells Identifies
    Author Manuscript Published OnlineFirst on July 6, 2016; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0149 Author manuscripts have been peer reviewed and accepted for publication but have not yet been edited. Screening of conditionally reprogrammed patient-derived carcinoma cells identifies ERCC3-MYC interactions as a target in pancreatic cancer. Natalya Beglyarova1, Eugenia Banina1, Yan Zhou2, Ramilia Mukhamadeeva3, Grigorii Andrianov3, Egor Bobrov1, Elena Lysenko1, Natalya Skobeleva1, Linara Gabitova1, Diana Restifo1, Max Pressman1, Ilya G. Serebriiskii1, John P. Hoffman1, Keren Paz4, Diana Behrens5, Vladimir Khazak6, Sandra A. Jablonski7, Erica A. Golemis1, Louis M. Weiner7, and Igor Astsaturov1† 1Program in Molecular Therapeutics, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Facility, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA. 3Department of Biochemistry, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russian Federation. 4Champions Oncology, Baltimore, MD. 5EPO Experimental Pharmacology and Oncology GmbH, Berlin, Germany. 6Nexus Pharma, Langhorne, PA. 7Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA. †To whom correspondence should be addressed: Igor Astsaturov, Fox Chase Cancer Center, 333 Cottman Avenue, Philadelphia, PA 19111. Phone (215) 728-3135, (443) 465-5212; Fax (215) 728-3616. E-mail: [email protected]. The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest. Author contributions: S.J., I.G.S., V.K., E.A.G., L.M.W. and I.A. designed research; N.B., Eu.B., Eg.B., N.S., L.G., D.R., Y.Z., E.L., M.P., D.B. and S.J. performed research; J.P.H., N.I.A., R.M., G. A. and I.G.S. contributed new reagents/analytical tools; Y.Z., I.S., R.M., G.A., I.G.S., N.I.A., V.K.
    [Show full text]
  • CYTOTOXIC and NON-CYTOTOXIC HAZARDOUS MEDICATIONS
    CYTOTOXIC and NON-CYTOTOXIC HAZARDOUS MEDICATIONS1 CYTOTOXIC HAZARDOUS MEDICATIONS NON-CYTOTOXIC HAZARDOUS MEDICATIONS Altretamine IDArubicin Acitretin Iloprost Amsacrine Ifosfamide Aldesleukin Imatinib 3 Arsenic Irinotecan Alitretinoin Interferons Asparaginase Lenalidomide Anastrazole 3 ISOtretinoin azaCITIDine Lomustine Ambrisentan Leflunomide 3 azaTHIOprine 3 Mechlorethamine Bacillus Calmette Guerin 2 Letrozole 3 Bleomycin Melphalan (bladder instillation only) Leuprolide Bortezomib Mercaptopurine Bexarotene Megestrol 3 Busulfan 3 Methotrexate Bicalutamide 3 Methacholine Capecitabine 3 MitoMYcin Bosentan MethylTESTOSTERone CARBOplatin MitoXANtrone Buserelin Mifepristone Carmustine Nelarabine Cetrorelix Misoprostol Chlorambucil Oxaliplatin Choriogonadotropin alfa Mitotane CISplatin PACLitaxel Cidofovir Mycophenolate mofetil Cladribine Pegasparaginase ClomiPHENE Nafarelin Clofarabine PEMEtrexed Colchicine 3 Nilutamide 3 Cyclophosphamide Pentostatin cycloSPORINE Oxandrolone 3 Cytarabine Procarbazine3 Cyproterone Pentamidine (Aerosol only) Dacarbazine Raltitrexed Dienestrol Podofilox DACTINomycin SORAfenib Dinoprostone 3 Podophyllum resin DAUNOrubicin Streptozocin Dutasteride Raloxifene 3 Dexrazoxane SUNItinib Erlotinib 3 Ribavirin DOCEtaxel Temozolomide Everolimus Sirolimus DOXOrubicin Temsirolimus Exemestane 3 Tacrolimus Epirubicin Teniposide Finasteride 3 Tamoxifen 3 Estramustine Thalidomide Fluoxymesterone 3 Testosterone Etoposide Thioguanine Flutamide 3 Tretinoin Floxuridine Thiotepa Foscarnet Trifluridine Flucytosine Topotecan Fulvestrant
    [Show full text]