DOCSLIB.ORG

University of Huddersfield Repository

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of Huddersfield Repository University of Huddersfield Repository Robotham, Thomas The effects of a vertical reflection on the relationship between listener preference and timbral and spatial attributes Original Citation Robotham, Thomas (2016) The effects of a vertical reflection on the relationship between listener preference and timbral and spatial attributes. Masters thesis, University of Huddersfield. This version is available at http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/id/eprint/30196/ The University Repository is a digital collection of the research output of the University, available on Open Access. Copyright and Moral Rights for the items on this site are retained by the individual author and/or other copyright owners. Users may access full items free of charge; copies of full text items generally can be reproduced, displayed or performed and given to third parties in any format or medium for personal research or study, educational or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge, provided: • The authors, title and full bibliographic details is credited in any copy; • A hyperlink and/or URL is included for the original metadata page; and • The content is not changed in any way. For more information, including our policy and submission procedure, please contact the Repository Team at: [email protected]. http://eprints.hud.ac.uk/ THE EFFECTS OF A VERTICAL REFLECTION ON THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LISTENER PREFERENCE AND TIMBRAL AND SPATIAL ATTRIBUTES THOMAS ROBOTHAM A Thesis submitted to the University of Huddersfield in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science by Research Applied Psychoacoustic Lab April 2016 Copyright Statement i. The author of this thesis (including any appendices and/or schedules to this thesis) owns any copyright in it (the “Copyright”) and s/he has given The University of Huddersfield the right to use such Copyright for any administrative, promotional, educational and/or teaching purposes. ii. Copies of this thesis, either in full or in extracts, may be made only in accordance with the regulations of the University Library. Details of these regulations may be obtained from the Librarian. This page must form part of any such copies made. iii. The ownership of any patents, designs, trade marks and any and all other intellectual property rights except for the Copyright (the “Intellectual Property Rights”) and any reproductions of copyright works, for example graphs and tables (“Reproductions”), which may be described in this thesis, may not be owned by the author and may be owned by third parties. Such Intellectual Property Rights and Reproductions cannot and must not be made available for use without the prior written permission of the owner(s) of the relevant Intellectual Property Rights and/or Reproductions. - 2 - ABSTRACT Early reflections play a large role in our perception of sound and as such, have been subject to various treatments over the years due to changing tastes and room requirements. Whilst there is research into these early reflections, arriving both vertically and horizontally in small rooms regarding critical listening, little research has been conducted regarding the beneficial or detrimental impact of early vertical reflections on listener preference, in the context of listening for entertainment. Two experiments were conducted through subjective testing in a semi-anechoic chamber and listening room in order to assess subjects’ preference of playback of a direct sound against playback with the addition of the first geometrical vertical reflection. Program material remained constant in both experiments, employing five musical and one speech stimuli. Experiment one used a paired comparison method assessing a subjects’ preference, and perceived magnitude of timbral and spatial difference provided by a frequency independent ceiling reflection. Each comparison was followed by a free verbalisation task for subjects to describe the perceived change(s). Experiment two investigated this further by focusing specifically on subjects’ preference with a frequency dependent reflection. A more controlled verbalisation task provided a list of descriptive terms which the subject’s used to describe which attribute(s) influenced their preference. The results show that preference for playback with the inclusion of a vertical reflection was highly varied across both subjects and samples. However both experiments suggest that the main perceptual attribute with which subject’s based their preference was timbre, common spatial attributes (image shift/spread) cannot be used to predict preference. Experiment two suggests that the alteration of the frequency content of a vertical reflection, may also provide a more consistent level of preference for certain stimuli. It is also shown that while certain attributes occur frequently (brilliance/fullness) for describing preference, others less frequently used (nasal/boxy), may influence preference to a greater extent. - 3 - CONTENTS Title Page .......................................................................................................... - 1 - Abstract ............................................................................................................ - 3 - Contents ............................................................................................................ - 4 - Figures .............................................................................................................. - 7 - Tables ............................................................................................................... - 8 - Equations .......................................................................................................... - 9 - Notation ............................................................................................................ - 9 - Acknowledgements ........................................................................................ - 11 - Chapter 1 ........................................................................................................ - 12 - INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................... - 12 - 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ - 12 - 1.1 Scope of This Thesis .......................................................................................................... - 12 - Chapter 2 ........................................................................................................ - 15 - LITERATURE REVIEW ............................................................................... - 15 - 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ - 15 - 2.1 Control of Reflections in Studios ....................................................................................... - 16 - 2.2 Objective Metrics ............................................................................................................... - 17 - 2.2.1 Reverberation Time ...................................................................................... - 18 - 2.2.2 First and Early Reflections ........................................................................... - 19 - 2.2.3 Early to Late Reflections .............................................................................. - 20 - 2.3 The Effects of Early Reflections ........................................................................................ - 22 - 2.4 Perception of Lateral Sounds ............................................................................................. - 25 - 2.4.1 Spatial Impression ......................................................................................... - 26 - 2.4.2 Apparent Source Width ................................................................................ - 27 - 2.4.3 Listener Envelopment .................................................................................... - 28 - 2.4.4 Early Lateral Reflections And Timbre .......................................................... - 28 - 2.5 Perception of Vertical Sounds ........................................................................................... - 31 - 2.5.1 Detection of Vertical Reflections ................................................................. - 32 - 2.5.2 Vertical Localisation .................................................................................... - 35 - 2.6 Perceptual Assessment ...................................................................................................... - 39 - - 4 - 2.6.1 Attribute Scaling............................................................................................ - 39 - 2.6.2 Attribute Descriptions ................................................................................... - 42 - 2.7 Summary ............................................................................................................................ - 45 - Chapter 3 ........................................................................................................ - 47 - REFLECTION MODELLING ....................................................................... - 47 - 3.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ - 47 - 3.1 Initial Measurements.........................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Effect of an Additional Reflection in a Precedence Effect Experiment
    The effect of an additional reflection in a precedence effect experiment Matthew J. Goupell,a) Gongqiang Yu,b) and Ruth Y. Litovsky Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin, 1500 Highland Avenue, Madison, Wisconsin 53705 (Received 8 April 2011; revised 20 January 2012; accepted 9 February 2012) Studies on the precedence effect typically utilize a two-source paradigm, which is not realistic relative to real world situations where multiple reflections exist. A step closer to multiple-reflection situations was studied using a three-source paradigm. Discrimination of interaural time differences (ITDs) was measured for one-, two-, and three-source stimuli, using clicks presented over head- phones. The ITD was varied in either the first, second, or the third source. The inter-source intervals ranged from 0–130 ms. A perceptual weighting model was extended to incorporate the three-source stimuli and used to interpret the data. The effect of adding a third source could mostly, but not entirely, be understood by the interaction of effects observed in the precedence effect with two sources. Specifically, for delays between 1 and 8 ms, the ITD information of prior sources was typically weighted more heavily than subsequent sources. For delays greater than 8 ms, subsequent sources were typically weighted slightly more heavily than prior sources. However, there were specific conditions that showed a more complex interaction between the sources. These findings suggest that the two-source paradigm provides a strong basis for understanding how the auditory system processes reflections in spatial hearing tasks. VC 2012 Acoustical Society of America. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1121/1.3689849] PACS number(s): 43.66.Qp, 43.66.Pn, 43.66.Ba [MAA] Pages: 2958–2967 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterizing Apparent Source Width Perception
    CONTRIBUTIONS TO HEARING RESEARCH Volume 25 Johannes Käsbach Characterizing apparent source width perception Hearing Systems Department of Electrical Engineering Characterizing apparent source width perception PhD thesis by Johannes Käsbach Preliminary version: August 2, 2016 Technical University of Denmark 2016 © Johannes Käsbach, 2016 Cover illustration by Emma Ekstam. Preprint version for the assessment committee. Pagination will differ in the final published version. This PhD dissertation is the result of a research project carried out at the Hearing Systems Group, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark. The project was partly financed by the CAHR consortium (2/3) and by the Technical University of Denmark (1/3). Supervisors Prof. Torsten Dau Phd Tobias May Hearing Systems Group Department of Electrical Engineering Technical University of Denmark Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark Abstract Our hearing system helps us in forming a spatial impression of our surrounding, especially for sound sources that lie outside our visual field. We notice birds chirping in a tree, hear an airplane in the sky or a distant train passing by. The localization of sound sources is an intuitive concept to us, but have we ever thought about how large a sound source appears to us? We are indeed capable of associating a particular size with an acoustical object. Imagine an orchestra that is playing in a concert hall. The orchestra appears with a certain acoustical size, sometimes even larger than the orchestra’s visual dimensions. This sensation is referred to as apparent source width. It is caused by room reflections and one can say that more reflections generate a larger apparent source width.
    [Show full text]
  • The Precedence Effect Ruth Y
    The precedence effect Ruth Y. Litovskya) and H. Steven Colburn Hearing Research Center and Department of Biomedical Engineering, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215 William A. Yost and Sandra J. Guzman Parmly Hearing Institute, Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60201 ͑Received 20 April 1998; revised 9 April 1999; accepted 23 June 1999͒ In a reverberant environment, sounds reach the ears through several paths. Although the direct sound is followed by multiple reflections, which would be audible in isolation, the first-arriving wavefront dominates many aspects of perception. The ‘‘precedence effect’’ refers to a group of phenomena that are thought to be involved in resolving competition for perception and localization between a direct sound and a reflection. This article is divided into five major sections. First, it begins with a review of recent work on psychoacoustics, which divides the phenomena into measurements of fusion, localization dominance, and discrimination suppression. Second, buildup of precedence and breakdown of precedence are discussed. Third measurements in several animal species, developmental changes in humans, and animal studies are described. Fourth, recent physiological measurements that might be helpful in providing a fuller understanding of precedence effects are reviewed. Fifth, a number of psychophysical models are described which illustrate fundamentally different approaches and have distinct advantages and disadvantages. The purpose of this review is to provide a framework within which to describe the effects of precedence and to help in the integration of data from both psychophysical and physiological experiments. It is probably only through the combined efforts of these fields that a full theory of precedence will evolve and useful models will be developed.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptual Implications of Different Ambisonics-Based Methods for Binaural Reverberation Isaac Engel, Craig Henry, Sebastià V
    Perceptual implications of different Ambisonics-based methods for binaural reverberation Isaac Engel, Craig Henry, Sebastià V. Amengual Garí, Philip W. Robinson, and Lorenzo Picinali Citation: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 895 (2021); doi: 10.1121/10.0003437 View online: https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0003437 View Table of Contents: https://asa.scitation.org/toc/jas/149/2 Published by the Acoustical Society of America ARTICLES YOU MAY BE INTERESTED IN Head-related transfer function recommendation based on perceptual similarities and anthropometric features The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 3809 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002884 Auditory perception stability evaluation comparing binaural and loudspeaker Ambisonic presentations of dynamic virtual concert auralizations The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 149, 246 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002942 Impact of face masks on voice radiation The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 3663 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002853 Adding air absorption to simulated room acoustic models The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, EL408 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002489 Binaural rendering of Ambisonic signals by head-related impulse response time alignment and a diffuseness constraint The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 143, 3616 (2018); https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5040489 Perception of loudness and envelopment for different orchestral dynamics The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 148, 2137 (2020); https://doi.org/10.1121/10.0002101 ...................................ARTICLE Perceptual implications of different Ambisonics-based methods for binaural reverberation Isaac Engel,1,a) Craig Henry,1 SebastiaV.
    [Show full text]
  • The Relation Between Spatial Impression and the Precedence Effect
    THE RELATION BETWEEN SPATIAL IMPRESSION AND THE PRECEDENCE EFFECT Masayuki Morimoto Environmental Acoustics Laboratory, Faculty of Engineering, Kobe University Rokko Nada Kobe 657-8501 Japan [email protected] ABSTRACT Sound Source This paper reviews results of listening tests on auditory spatial S(w) impression (ASI) that describe the relation between individual Room Transfer Function, R(w) characteristics of spatial impression and the precedence effect. ASI is a general concept defined as the spatial extent of the sound S(w)×R(w) image, and is comprised at least two components. One is auditory Head-Related Transfer Function, HRTFl,r(w) Physical Space source width (ASW), defined as the width of a sound image fused temporally and spatially with the direct (preceding) sound image; Entrance of Ear Canal the other is listener envelopment (LEV), defined as the degree of Pl,r(w)=S(w)×R(w)×HRTFl,r(w) fullness of the sound image surrounding the listener, and which Auditory Organ excludes the direct sound image for which ASW is judged. Listeners can perceive separately these two components of ASI, ・・・ and their subjective reports demonstrate that they can distinguish Psychological Space D1 = f1(pl, r) D2 D3 ・・・ Dn Perception of between them. The perception of ASW and LEV has close Elemental Sense connection with The precedence effect (the law of the first wave front). Acoustic signal components that arrive within the time and Subjective Judgment E1 = g1(D1) E2 E3 ・・・ En amplitude limits of the effect contribute to ASW, and those beyond to Elemental Sense the upper limits contribute to LEV.
    [Show full text]
  • Precedence Effect for Specular and Diffuse Reflections
    Acta Acustica 2021, 5,1 Ó F. Wendt & R. Höldrich, Published by EDP Sciences, 2021 https://doi.org/10.1051/aacus/2020027 Available online at: https://acta-acustica.edpsciences.org SCIENTIFIC ARTICLE Precedence effect for specular and diffuse reflections Florian Wendt* and Robert Höldrich University of Music and Performing Arts Graz, Austria, Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics, Inffeldgasse 10/3, 8010 Graz, Austria Received 26 May 2020, Accepted 3 November 2020 Abstract – Studies on the precedence effect are typically conducted by presenting two identical sounds simulating direct sound and specular reflection. However, when a sound is reflected from irregular surface, it is redirect into many directions resulting in directional and temporal diffusion. This contribution introduces a simulation of Lambertian diffusing reflections. The perceptual influences of diffusion are studied in a listening experiment; echo thresholds and masked thresholds of specular and diffuse reflections are measured. Results show that diffusion makes the reflections more easily detectable than specular reflections of the same total energy. Indications are found that this mainly due to temporal diffusion, while the directional diffusion has little effect. Accordingly, the modeling of the echo thresholds is achieved by a temporal alignment of the experimental data based on the energy centroid of reflection responses. For the modeling of masked threshold the temporal masking pattern for forward masking is taken into account. Keywords: Echo suppression, Sound source localization, Room acoustics, Spatialization 1 Introduction precedence; increased echo threshold delays imply a stronger echo suppression and consequently a stronger precedence The precedence effect refers to a group of perceptual effect. phenomena which allow us to localize sound sources in Many investigations have contributed to our under- challenging reverberant environments.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning a Precedence Effect-Like Weighting Function for the Generalized Cross-Correlation Framework Kevin W
    2156 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUDIO, SPEECH, AND LANGUAGE PROCESSING, VOL. 14, NO. 6, NOVEMBER 2006 Learning a Precedence Effect-Like Weighting Function for the Generalized Cross-Correlation Framework Kevin W. Wilson, Student Member, IEEE, and Trevor Darrell, Member, IEEE Abstract—Speech source localization in reverberant environ- based on cross-correlation in a set of time–frequency regions as ments has proved difficult for automated microphone array our low-level localization cues. systems. Because of its nonstationary nature, certain features ob- Our paper makes three contributions. First, we devise a servable in the reverberant speech signal, such as sudden increases in audio energy, provide cues to indicate time–frequency regions method that uses recorded speech and simulated reverberation that are particularly useful for audio localization. We exploit these to generate a corpus of reverberated speech and the associated cues by learning a mapping from reverberated signal spectro- error for TDOA estimates made from this reverberated speech. grams to localization precision using ridge regression. Using the Second, we use this corpus to learn mappings from the reverber- learned mappings in the generalized cross-correlation framework, ated speech to a measure of TDOA uncertainty and demonstrate we demonstrate improved localization performance. Addition- ally, the resulting mappings exhibit behavior consistent with the its utility in improving source localization. Third, we make a well-known precedence effect from psychoacoustic studies. connection between the mappings learned by our system and the precedence effect, the tendency of human listeners to rely Index Terms—Acoustic arrays, array signal processing, delay es- timation, direction of arrival estimation, speech processing.
    [Show full text]
  • What We Already Know About Spatialization with Compact Spherical Arrays As Variable-Directivity Loudspeakers
    Proc. of inSONIC2015, Aesthetics of Spatial Audio in Sound, Music and Sound Art Nov 27–28, 2015, Karlsruhe, Germany WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT SPATIALIZATION WITH COMPACT SPHERICAL ARRAYS AS VARIABLE-DIRECTIVITY LOUDSPEAKERS Matthias Frank Gerriet K. Sharma Franz Zotter Institute of Electronic Music and Acoustics University of Music and Performing Arts Inffeldgasse 10/3, 8010 Graz, Austria [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Our initial work with the icosahedral, variable-directivity loudspeakers (ICO) has revealed new possibilities of thinking spatial music and its aesthetics. In contrast to surrounding loudspeaker systems, the ICO technically offers control of the strengths of the wall reflections that could be excited from a single performer’s location. The ICO has already been successfully employed in various compositions that were performed in concerts in different spaces and environments. Existing compositions yield sound objects that move away from the ICO into different shapes, distances, and locations in the room. This implies that the ICO orchestrates space with new composition elements in electroacoustic music, by influencing diffuse, early, and direct responses as artistic composition elements in a room. Our research project Orchestrating Space by Icosahedral Loudspeaker (OSIL) aims at understanding the inter-relation and control of these elements better, in terms of their sculptural-choreographic nature, and how they can be used to express motion, localization, extent, and depth. This contribution describes artistic and scientific research goals and approaches, and what our scientific research could already show. 1. INTRODUCTION Spatialization. Interest in using space as a compositional parameter with different, partially movable sound sources did not begin with electronic music, however the use of loudspeaker systems enabled more accurate control thereof.
    [Show full text]
  • Are the Precedence Effect and Spatial Impression the Result of Different Auditory Processes?
    Free-Field Virtual Psychoacoustics and Hearing Impairment: Paper ICA2016-816 Are the precedence effect and spatial impression the result of different auditory processes? M. Torben Pastore(a), Elizabeth Teret(b), Brandon Cudequest(b),Jonas Braasch(b) (a)Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA, [email protected] (c)Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, USA Abstract The sensation of auditory spaciousness is closely related to the pattern of reflections in a room, often described by a room impulse response (RIR). The early and late portions of RIRs are cor- respondingly the basis of most metrics of auditory spatial impression. Even though this pattern of reflections might reasonably be expected to indicate many sound source locations, listeners commonly localize sounds to their sources. This phenomenon, called the precedence effect (PE), is often thought to result from the suppression of reflections. This appears to present a paradox. How do we gain spatial information from reflections we are thought to suppress? Also, is this process different for early and late reverberation? In three parallel studies, we addressed this question by examining the specific roles of specular (early) and diffuse (usually late) reflections. The first experiment compared listener performance under conditions that elicited the precedence effect with diffuse or specular reflections. The second investigated listeners’ ability to match re- verb times using different types of stimuli. The third compared apparent source width (ASW) resulting from physically wide sources to narrow sound sources with side reflections. Our results suggest that the PE, ASW, and listener envelopment are the result of closely related auditory pro- cesses. We also find that listeners do not appear to have a clear internal temporal representation of the decaying late reverb tail of a room impulse response.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutorial 26 Applications of Binaural Psychoacoustics in Audio — Designing Spatial Audio Techniques for Human Listeners
    Tutorial 26 Applications of Binaural Psychoacoustics in Audio — Designing Spatial Audio Techniques for Human Listeners Ville Pulkki Department of Signal Processing and Acoustics Aalto University, Finland June 6, 2016 Background literature "Communication acoustics – Introduction to Speech, Audio and Psychoacoustics" Textbook. Ch 12: Spatial hearing, Pulkki & Karjalainen 2015, Wiley "Parametric time-frequency-domain spatial audio" Contributed book with 15 chapters. eds Pulkki, Delikaris-Manias and Politis, Wiley, early 2017 Spatial hearing 2/72 Pulkki June 6, 2016 Dept Signal Processing and Acoustics Where and what? Localization of sources Beam-forming towards different directions squawk chirp chirp brr toot! quack! swooh clip clop wind sound swooh rustle Spatial hearing 3/72 Pulkki June 6, 2016 Dept Signal Processing and Acoustics Response to quite limited range of wavelengths (380-740nm) Human eye The cells in the eye are a priori sensitive to direction of light Spatial hearing 4/72 Pulkki June 6, 2016 Dept Signal Processing and Acoustics Human eye The cells in the eye are a priori sensitive to direction of light Response to quite limited range of wavelengths (380-740nm) Spatial hearing 4/72 Pulkki June 6, 2016 Dept Signal Processing and Acoustics One ear alone knows quite little of the spatial position of the source Human spatial hearing Response to very large range of wavelengths (2cm–30m) Ear canal diameter <1cm, sound just bends into the canal Spatial hearing 5/72 Pulkki June 6, 2016 Dept Signal Processing and Acoustics Human spatial hearing Response to very large range of wavelengths (2cm–30m) Ear canal diameter <1cm, sound just bends into the canal One ear alone knows quite little of the spatial position of the source Spatial hearing 5/72 Pulkki June 6, 2016 Dept Signal Processing and Acoustics Signal characteristics in one ear / Signal differences between two ears Hearing mechanisms estimate the most probable position for source Hearing can be fooled easily by audio techniques! Human spatial hearing c J.
    [Show full text]