Tonto National Forest – Phoenix, AZ
To Gain Public Understanding, Support, and Compliance
U. S. Forest Service, Southwestern Region Tonto National Forest
January 30, 2014
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Table of Contents List of Appendices ...... 4 Executive Summary ...... 5 Background and Travel Management Decision ...... 6 Purpose of an Implementation Strategy ...... 7 How This Strategy Will Be Updated ...... 7 Travel Management Implementation Strategy Team ...... 7 Travel Management Implementation Task Force ...... 9 Travel Planning Efforts to Date ...... 10 Communication Plan ...... 11 Summary ...... 12 Issues ...... 12 Opportunity...... 12 Goals ...... 13 Key Themes and Messages ...... 13 Education ...... 17 Goals ...... 17 Education Roles and Responsibilities ...... 17 Objectives of the Education Plan ...... 19 Tools ...... 21 Safety ...... 22 Focus Areas First Year after Decision ...... 22 Volunteer Assistance Opportunities ...... 22 Funding ...... 23 Protection and Restoration ...... 23 Goals ...... 24 Engineering/Recreation Roles and Responsibilities ...... 24 Tools ...... 26 Safety ...... 26
Page 2 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Funding ...... 26 Focus Areas First Year after Decision ...... 26 Long Term Protection/Restoration Actions ...... 27 Enforcement ...... 27 Goals ...... 27 Objectives ...... 28 Roles and Responsibilities ...... 28 General Approach...... 29 Tools ...... 32 Safety ...... 32 Saturation Patrols...... 33 Training Needs ...... 33 MOUs with Other Law Enforcement Agencies ...... 34 Special Orders ...... 34 Funding ...... 34 Evaluation – Monitoring and Performance Reporting ...... 34 Goal ...... 34 Roles and Responsibilities ...... 35 Tools ...... 35 Safety ...... 35 Funding ...... 35 Accomplishments ...... 36 Performance Standards ...... 36 Route and Area Designations Managed to Standard...... 36 Acronyms ...... 38 Glossary of Terms...... 39
Page 3 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy List of Appendices
Appendix A: Draft R-3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy Attachment 1: Route and Area Designations Managed to Standard Attachment 2: Travel Aids Attachment 3: Travel Management Motor Vehicle Use Map Preparation and Review Process – Southwestern Region
Appendix B: Off Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Guide
Appendix C: Education Action Plan Attachment 1: Target Audiences for Communication and Education Attachment 2: Digital Maps for mobile devices/Forest Access/ Dixie National Forest Digital Ranger Program Attachment 3: Supplemental Color Travel Map Printing overview compiled by Coconino National Forest Supplemental Color Travel Map example Lewis and Clark National Forest
Appendix D: Protection and Restoration Strategy and Forest TM Implementation Strategy Sign Plan Attachment 1: Glossary of Road Classifications Attachment 2: Trail Class Matrices and Design Parameters Attachment 3: Trail Management Objectives Attachment 4: Trail Operation/Maintenance Considerations and National Quality Standards for Trails Attachment 5: Process for Considering Conversion of NFS Road to NFS Trail Attachment 6: Signing for Travel Management Rule Attachment 7: Sign Implementation Scheduling Form Examples
Appendix E: Tonto National Forest Draft Check-in Check-out Program
Appendix F: TM Implementation Strategy Evaluation and Monitoring Action Plan
All appendices are separate files. All may be updated independently of the body of this plan on an annual basis or as needed.
Page 4 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Executive Summary
This Tonto National Forest Draft Travel Management (TM) Implementation Strategy was created following National and Regional Forest Service direction (see Appendices A and B). The TM Strategy provides over-arching direction to implement the six tasks outlined within the forest service route and area designations managed to standard performance measures.
These tasks include the following and are incorporated into this draft Strategy: • Education/Communication Strategy • Production and Distribution of Motor Vehicle Use Map • Protection/Restoration Strategy • Forest TM Implementation Sign Plan • Enforcement • Evaluation and Monitoring of TM Implementation
Appendices C, D, and F contain a schedule of action items for Education, Protection/Restoration, Forest TM Implementation Signing and Evaluation and Monitoring. These action items are broken out by the following timeframes: • completion within a year after the decision • completion within a year after the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) has been produced • completion within two years after the decision • long term strategies to be completed within 3-5 years after the decision
This draft Tonto National Forest Travel Management (TM) Implementation Strategy prepared by the TM Implementation Strategy Team (internal Team) considers the range of all action alternatives considered within the Travel Planning Analysis. This draft strategy will be updated, finalized, and approved by the Forest Supervisor and Leadership Team after the Record of Decision has been issued for Travel Management on the Forest. This document tiers to the following Tonto National Forest 2014 Draft Plans: Conservation Education, and Fire Prevention.
Implementing the Travel Management (TM) decision on the Tonto National Forest will take a long-term commitment from the forest and continuation of the strong, meaningful partnerships with local/state/tribal governments, user groups, interest groups, and forest visitors. The Tonto National Forest proposes to convene a TM Implementation Task Force with membership composed of representatives from groups listed above. For implementation of Travel Planning on the Tonto National Forest to be successful, it will be crucial to gain public understanding, support, compliance and volunteer assistance with implementation. This Task Force would serve as a sounding board for implementation efforts as well as serving to coordinate and assist with completion of on-the-ground volunteer TM implementation projects.
Page 5 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Background and Travel Management Decision
The Tonto National Forest encompasses almost 3 million acres of rugged and spectacular country, ranging from the Saguaro studded Sonoran Desert to the pine forested mountains of the Mogollon Rim. Elevations run from 1,300 to 7,900 feet and offers outstanding recreational opportunities throughout the year. The Tonto is the fifth largest National Forest in the Nation and is one of the most visited “urban forests” with approximately 5.8 million visitors annually. Managing recreation is particularly challenging on the Tonto National Forest with its fragile desert ecosystems and high demand for motorized access.
The Forest is located in Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yavapai counties in central Arizona. Coconino County is located directly north of the forest boundary and Navajo County is located to the northeast of the forest boundary. There are currently six ranger districts on the Forest: Cave Creek headquartered in Scottsdale; Globe, Mesa, and Payson headquartered in each respective community, Pleasant Valley headquartered in Young and Tonto Basin, headquartered at Roosevelt. The Supervisor’s Office is headquartered in Phoenix. The Travel Management Rule came out in 2005 and provides for a system of roads, trails and areas that are designated for motor vehicle use. The Rule prohibits the use of motor vehicles off the designated system as well as use of motor vehicles on routes in areas not consistent with their designation. After initiating compliance with the Travel Management Rule under an Environmental Analysis (EA), the Tonto National Forest determined that the level of significance reached a point that environmental analysis for travel management under an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) would be more appropriate. All comments provided throughout the process thus far, including those to the 2009 proposed action, the 2012 Environmental Assessment, and public meetings, will continue to be considered and were incorporated into either the proposed action for the DEIS or alternatives to that proposed action.
The modified proposed action scoped on February 1, 2013 would result in approximately 1,740 miles of NFS road (including public highways) and 2,229 miles of motorized trails (approximately 280 miles of user-created routes including administrative use) designated for motorized use and 1,417 acres within 4 designated areas open to motor vehicles for cross- country travel (with 4 additional tot lots), and motorized access for the following: 1,293,178 acres for big game retrieval, 91,391 acres dispersed camping, and 161,785 acres for fuelwood gathering on the Tonto National Forest. Of the 2,229 miles proposed to designate as motorized trail, in the modified proposed action of the DEIS, 78 miles would be for single-track motorcycle and 2,151 would be for general motorized trail, that would include travel by motorcycle, ATV (All-Terrain Vehicle), UTV (Utility Trail Vehicle) or full size vehicle (Jeeps, high clearance vehicles, etc.) The Draft Environmental Impact Statement is tentatively scheduled for release to the public March 2014 with a Record of Decision tentatively expected sometime early in 2015.
Update with final decision figures when available.
Page 6 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Purpose of an Implementation Strategy
The purpose of this document is to identify a strategy and guidelines for implementation of the Travel Management Rule and associated Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) on the Tonto National Forest. The goal of this strategy is to provide for the long-term sustainability of motor vehicle access and quality motorized recreation opportunities on the Tonto National Forest in a manner that protects natural and cultural resources and gains understanding, support, and compliance by the public.
The Draft Implementation Strategy will be divided into four areas: Education (including a Communication and Education Action Plan), Protection and Restoration and Forest TM Implementation Strategy Sign Plan, Enforcement and TM Implementation Strategy Evaluation (including an Evaluation and Monitoring Plan). These components are consistent with the proposed Route and Area Designations Managed to Standard Performance Measures proposed by the Washington Office March 14, 2013.
Appendix A of this document contains the Draft Southwestern Region 3 (R-3) Travel Management Implementation Strategy. Attachment 1 of the R-3 Strategy contains the proposed Route and Area Designations Managed to Standard Performance Measures. The R- 3 Strategy supplements the National Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Appendix B) with Regional expectations to gain greater consistency with implementation of travel planning among forests within R-3.
How This Strategy Will Be Updated
The final Travel Management Implementation Strategy draft will be updated after the final Record of Decision (ROD) has been issued for TM and will be reviewed and approved by the Forest Supervisor and Leadership Team.
The Tonto National Forest Travel Management Implementation Strategy is meant to be adaptive in nature to address the dynamic needs of the implementation process. Subsequently, this strategy will be updated annually or as needed. Recommended changes or additions to the strategy received from the public, forest employees, local/state/tribal governments, the TM Implementation Taskforce, and the TM Implementation Strategy Team will be reviewed and approved by the Forest Supervisor and Forest Leadership Team. The most current version of the Tonto National Forest Implementation Strategy will be posted on the Forest’s webpage http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/tonto/).
Travel Management Implementation Strategy Team
The Travel Management Implementation Strategy Team may consist of the following: Implementation Strategy Team Leader – Greg Schuster Page 7 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Civil Engineering Team Leader - Lonny Rollins Engineering Roads Data Steward - Dave Franquero Forest Assistant Engineer - Christine Crawford (engineering information and support) Cave Creek District Ranger – Louise Congdon Mesa District Ranger - Gary Hanna Public Affairs Officer – (PAO) - (vacant) Law Enforcement Patrol Captain - Bray Addison GIS – Kenna Schoenle District Recreation Specialists Mesa RD – Jason Scow Payson RD – Chelsea Muise Cave Creek RD – Eric Norman Central Zone Representative (Tonto Basin/Globe) – (Vacant) Wildlife Staff Tonto Basin RD – Gregg Dunn Landscape Architect – Kimber Jones Arizona Game and Fish –Tim Holt Forest Volunteer Coordinator – (vacant)
The Implementation Strategy Teams’ roles are as follows: • Provide oversight of the implementation process. • Finalize an Implementation Strategy and Action Plan Appendices. • Assign personnel and oversee project work to accomplish work task items identified within Action Plan Appendices. • District Rangers will be responsible for actual implementation and monitoring and will need to incorporate Travel Management Implementation into their districts program of work. • Address implementation issues as they arise. • Inform the FLT on small d decisions and present big D decisions as necessary. • Provide the FLT with pertinent implementation progress updates and recommended updates to the strategy or TM implementation. • Coordinate with staff areas and districts to ensure integration and performance measure accomplishment. • Coordinate with TM Implementation Task Force and forest employees. • Update Implementation Strategy, propose updates for the MVUM annual update/printing and prepare TM Implementation Strategy Evaluation/Monitoring Report annually.
Page 8 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Travel Management Implementation Task Force
The Travel Management Implementation Task Force will consist of community participants (approx. 12), one District Ranger and TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader.
Participation in the Travel Management Implementation Task Force is expected from current and potential Partner, Local Community, and Special Interest organizations: See Appendix C/Attachment 1. The TM Implementation Task Force differs from the TM Implementation Strategy Team in that most of the membership is composed of representatives from community partners and partnership organizations. Participants will be asked to make a two year commitment to serve on the Task Force. This Task Force will serve to provide feedback received from the public and their organizations regarding what implementation tasks are running smoothly and provide recommendations for improvement. The Task Force will not be a decision making entity, it will be established to network with groups to educate, support and provide assistance with implementation efforts. The TM Implementation Strategy Team will forward and present Task Force input and updates on volunteer coordinated projects to the Forest Leadership Team.
The Tasks Force’s roles are as follow: • Meet biannually (incorporating a field trip). • Consider Forest Service Travel Management Implementation Strategy. Provides input into strategy modifications/updates (after first year). • Serve as a sounding board from the community regarding implementation. • Monitors TM implementation and provides feedback to the TM Implementation Strategy Team about areas of success and challenge. • Listens to public concerns about implementation. • Troubleshoots options for solving problems – may recommend ideas to Forest Leadership Team through the TM Implementation Strategy Team. • Makes recommendations to TM Implementation Strategy Team about how the Forest can expand capacity to implement motorized travel plan quicker, more broadly, or in specific areas (e.g., bring money, time, and expertise, volunteer and grant opportunities etc. to the table). • Establish a Working Group within the Task Force to bring partnership organizations to the table to describe and identify projects that organizations would like to be involved with and complete. Examples to include road, trail, OHV area and permit zone signing, development of supplemental maps and downloads for personal devices, visitor contacts, TM Implementation monitoring, trail maintenance and adopt-a-trail program etc. The working group and organizations would work directly with the district where project planning and execution would occur. • Potential project for TM Implementation Task Force or Working Group or TRAL (if interested) – Develop and maintain a Tonto OHV user Forum on the internet. Page 9 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Travel Planning Efforts to Date
The Tonto National Forest has been actively engaging the public in the Environmental Assessment (EA) and Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) planning phases of TM. In March 2014, the forest is tentatively scheduled to release the DEIS for the project.
The Arizona Game and Fish Department has been involved in travel planning on the Tonto National Forest since 2007, with the initial proposed action in 2009, and the draft Environmental Assessment in 2012. In March 2013, the Forest invited the Arizona Game and Fish Department to be a cooperating agency in the preparation of the Forest Travel Management Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). Field Supervisor Tim Holt was assigned to collaborate and cooperate with the development of the environmental analysis and submitted a specialist report for wildlife related recreation. Wildlife related recreation is defined as hunting, fishing and wildlife viewing. The report also discusses associated economic effects and observed effects on wildlife and wildlife related recreation after Travel Management Plan Implementation on the Kaibab and Coconino National Forests. Tim Holt is serving as a member of the TM Implementation Strategy Team.
Education Forest employees: • Participated in many community events where information was handed out regarding TM. o Fish and Game Outdoor Expo -2013 • Conducted an internal education session on all districts. • Handed out and posted Travel Management information brochure for Arizona Forests. • Published several news releases regarding development of Travel Management Plan and encouraged public comment through formal NEPA process. • One-on-one communication regarding Travel Management with Forest visitors during routine field going duties. • Met with local/state/tribal governments during regular coordination meetings to discuss Travel Management planning efforts. • AGFD published news releases encouraging public comment through NEPA process and through direct contact through email database for constituents. • AGFD published notification of USFS travel management planning efforts in various documents (most notably in the annual hunting regulations booklet). • The Draft Tonto National Forest Conservation Education plan identifies Travel Management transition as a key theme within the Land Ethic/Watershed topic.
Protection and Restoration The Engineering Staff: Reviewed the existing road system being managed on the Tonto National Forest to determine the minimum system needed to:
Page 10 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
• meet resource protection and other management objectives adopted in the Forest Plan • meet applicable statutory and regulatory requirements • reflect long-term funding expectations • ensure that the identified system minimized adverse environmental impacts associated with road construction, reconstruction decommissioning and maintenance
Once each road had been analyzed, the information was further reviewed on a district level by district rangers, Forest service personnel familiar with the existing road and resource conditions, and Arizona Game and Fish Department wildlife managers whose wildlife management responsibilities overlapped with corresponding district boundaries. The No Action Alternative as well as all action alternatives contained in the DEIS utilized this corrected data.
Enforcement The Patrol Captain for the Tonto National Forest Bray Addison is serving on the Interdisciplinary Team for Travel Management and prepared a Law Enforcement Specialists Report for the Travel Planning Analysis DEIS.
Tonto National Forest law enforcement officers, AGFD wildlife managers and law enforcement specialists have regularly had one-on-one communications with Forest visitors regarding Forest travel management planning through their normal course of duties.
Tonto National Forest law enforcement officers have initiated communication with County Sheriff’s offices’ regarding education and enforcement of travel management planning efforts.
Evaluation A TM Implementation Strategy Monitoring Plan with annual monitoring reporting will be incorporated into the TM Implementation Strategy.
Communication Plan
This plan outlines a communication strategy for the Tonto National Forest to enhance employee and public understanding of Travel Management and associated regulations, and to gain understanding, support and compliance of travel management decisions made at the local level.
The focus of this plan is the implementation phase – once the Tonto National Forest has
Page 11 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy completed the travel management planning process, issued a decision, and produced a Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM). Elements of this plan will be phased, as the forest releases additional decisions regarding route obliteration and permit zone proposals.
Summary
The outcome of the travel management planning process is a decision made by the forest supervisor designating a transportation system for motorized use and the publication of a MVUM displaying the transportation network. Once an MVUM is printed and available, motorized travel off the designated system of forest roads, trails, and within permit zones is prohibited. Designated OHV areas will allow cross-country travel within the boundary of the designated area.
Issues
Implementation of TM will mean fundamental changes for visitors who have participated in largely unrestricted motorized travel in the past. All action alternatives propose to restrict cross- country travel on the northern districts of the forest (including Payson and Pleasant Valley) where it has previously been authorized. Although cross-country travel is currently restricted on the southern districts on the forest (including Cave Creek, Tonto Basin, Globe, and Mesa), implementation of these restrictions has been difficult to enforce and unauthorized routes have been created on these districts. There may be a perception of a change in management on the southern districts since current restrictions have not been followed.
It is imperative that information about the travel regulations governing motor vehicle use and the routes, OHV areas, permit zones open to motor vehicles and motorized access for big game retrieval, dispersed camping, designated dispersed campsites and fuelwood gathering be widely distributed and made available to interested and affected parties. This will mean publishing information to distribute, as well as training employees at all levels to be well versed regarding the changes in management and explaining the MVUM Map.
The distinction between OHV areas and permit zones must be clearly articulated to forest employees and the public. The implementation of new permit zones will be phased, since additional NEPA analysis for barrier construction and implementation of the permit zones will be required. Continuation of the Bulldog Canyon Permit Zone on the Mesa Ranger District is proposed within all action alternatives.
Opportunity
The purpose of this effort is to ensure that our communities of interest understand the changes in travel regulations governing motorized travel on the Tonto National Forest. Additionally, this communication effort provides an opportunity to continue working with those who were involved in the TM planning process and recreation volunteer and partnership efforts on the Forest.
Page 12 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Goals
The goal of this Communications Plan is to raise public awareness about the changes to motorized travel on Tonto National Forest, gain public understanding and utilization of the MVUM(s), and to work with key partners to gain public support and compliance with our travel management decisions. Integral to these steps is the inclusion of messages and information that will lead to more appropriate behaviors and natural and cultural resource protection considerations on the part of most motorized recreation users on Tonto National Forest.
State agencies responsible for managing Arizona’s OHV program are important partners in our communication effort. The Tonto National Forest has similar communication goals, objectives and messages making it vital to work closely with state colleagues as the forest implements communication strategies.
Key Themes and Messages
The Key Messages in this plan are categorized under several main Themes that should be included in all types of messaging for internal and external audiences. These will promote awareness of the theme, and promote and encourage a positive change in behaviors amongst recreational forest visitors. With each of the themes below is a descriptive paragraph followed by several key messages.
1. Serving People. The Forest Service is in the business of outdoor recreation –the forest manages some of the most outstanding scenic places in the Southwest and in America. People come to the Tonto National Forest for many recreational activities, such as camping, hiking, sightseeing, boating, rafting, horseback riding, fishing, hunting, mountain biking and riding OHVs and motorcycles. During the travel management planning process, the public was involved in identifying sustainable transportation networks for each of the Tonto National Forests six ranger districts. 1. According to a report published in 2003 by Arizona State Parks, 21 percent of Arizonans considered themselves OHV enthusiasts. (Arizona State Parks, 2003).
2. According to an Arizona State University West study, the number of OHVs in Arizona more than quadrupled from 1996 to 2006. (Arizona State University West )
3. The Tonto National Forest is the most heavily-used National Forest for motorized recreation, with nearly a million visitors using OHVs on the Forest annually (English, et al, 2012).
4. The Tonto National Forest worked with other federal and state agencies, tribal governments, and local partners and publics to develop logical networks of sustainable motor vehicle use routes.
Page 13 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
2. A Better Way to Manage OHV Use. The mission of the Forest Service is “Caring for the Land and Serving People.” Just as sustainability or improvement of our natural resources is important, so too is managing recreational use at sustainable levels. The increasing populations of Arizona’s urban areas particularly in the Phoenix area within close proximity to the forest are creating more pressures on the natural resources, and more demand for outdoor recreation. Establishing appropriate levels of recreation use challenges every land management agency. A large part of managing this challenge involves establishing or changing people’s behavior when they are engaged in recreational activities and helping them develop a land ethic.
1. In places on the Tonto National Forest where cross-county travel has been prohibited, the Forest has been seeing damage, potential for damage, and the creation of unauthorized routes.
2. Motorized travel is an appropriate use on the Tonto National Forest. TM was established to encourage responsible motorized recreation opportunities while protecting each forests natural and cultural resources.
3. The Forest Service manages a variety of multiple-uses and must protect opportunities for all users.
4. Tonto National Forest – and every other forest and grassland in the U.S. – is implementing travel management regulations governing OHV and other motorized vehicle use.
5. Motorized vehicle users of all types have a stake in ensuring continued responsible use and enjoyment of the Forest’s natural resources. TM is a concerted effort to provide environmentally-responsible motorized recreation where appropriate.
6. With the implementation of TM on the Tonto National Forest, cross-country travel by motorized vehicles is prohibited except in designated OHV areas. In other words,
7. Motorized travel is limited to the designated route system, which includes designated roads and trails open to the public, including those within designated permit zones. Travel off designated routes is subject to law enforcement action. Designated routes will be signed per the Forest TM Sign Plan Implementation Schedule. Travel on unsigned routes will be a violation of travel regulations. Many roads have been converted to designated motorized trails which will fall into two categories, those open for single-track motorcycle use and general motorized trail open to motorized vehicles including high clearance vehicles greater than 50 inches in width.
Responsible motorized travel includes: • Travel only on designated routes. • Obey all State and Federal laws pertaining to motor vehicle use (registration, helmets, etc.) • Avoid travel on routes when they are wet/muddy to prevent road/trail damage.
Page 14 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
• Do not harass wildlife. • Respect other forest visitor’s experiences, share the roads and trails. • Use established access routes to dispersed campsites. • Do not create play areas/loops next to dispersed campsites. • Obtain required permit for permit zones and stay on designated routes. • Keep your OHV muffled to reduce exhaust noise – more complaints, more closures! • Reduce the risk of fire – make sure your vehicle’s spark arrestor is in good working condition. • Avoid creating dust – slow down. • Do not cut fences – fences are important for range management. • Leave gates as you found them – open or closed. • Keep off of decommissioned routes – do not trespass. • Make sure that the trail is at least as wide as your OHV.
8. Remember: Desert and mountain ecosystems are fragile. Stay on designated roads and trails. Riding over plants destroys wildlife habitat.
9. If you see violations of appropriate use, know the steps to report (e.g., document, call the Forest Service. Tonto National Forest Supervisors Office – 602-225-5200 Cave Creek Ranger District - 480-595-3300 Globe Ranger District - 928-402-6200 Mesa Ranger District - 480-610-3300 Payson Ranger District - 928-474-7900 Pleasant Valley Ranger District - 928-462-4300 Tonto Basin Ranger District 928-467-3200
Additional law enforcement agencies to contact include: Non-emergency numbers Arizona Game OHV Violation Hotline 800-352-0700 Gila County Sheriff’s office 928-425-4449 Maricopa County Sheriff’s office 602-876-1011 Pinal County Sheriff’s office 800-420-8689 Yavapai County Sheriff’s office 928-771-3273 Coconino County Sheriff’s office 928-774-4523 Navajo County Sheriff’s office 928-536-7327
10. The TM Implementation Task Force is a public venue for bringing concerns about the motorized route system and uses to the TM Implementation Strategy Team. Comments received from the public per phone calls and comment forms received by mail and internet will be compiled and presented to the Task Force on a biannual basis.
Page 15 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
11. Administrative routes provide access for the following:
a. private lands
b. utility corridors
c. forest service administrative facilities
d. authorized livestock improvements
12. Some routes that previously were available for public use (prior to the decision) are being decommissioned for a variety of reasons including:
a. Route is duplicative.
b. Route creates natural resources damage (e.g., damage to wildlife, cultural resources, soils, water, etc.).
c. Route was intended for short-term administrative use only.
13. Users need to ―Protect their Privilege.
3. Working Together to Make the Change. Over the Forest Service’s 100-plus years, the agency has worked with many organizations, state agencies, volunteers, partners, tribal governments and members of the public to develop and improve our management decisions to ensure that future generations will continue to enjoy the wide range of goods and services including recreational pursuits from America’s national forests.
1. Public understanding, support and compliance of the travel management decision will be crucial to a successful implementation program and protection of natural and cultural resources meeting the Forest Service Mission of “Caring for the Land and Serving People”.
2. Most OHV users do not travel to the forest just to ride. They go for the same reasons many other folks do – to experience nature and view scenery, see wildlife, camp, fish, hunt or hike. They do not want to see impacted landscapes or be disturbed by unwanted noise any more than anyone else does.
3. We should not worry about how many routes and areas are designated for motorized use, but rather how well the transportation system will meet the needs of current and future generations.
4. Remember: plan ahead, pack a map (MVUM) and water, safety first, and respect the land. TREAD LIGHTLY.
Additional key messages and talking points will be developed regularly to address specific questions and issues being raised by employees, partners and members of the public related to implementation of TMR. Please contact TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader for all
Page 16 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
recent communication materials including key messages and talking points.
Education
In order for the Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy to be successful, it must meet the educational needs of both internal and external audiences, with each audience having its own specific information requirements and delivery systems. Education is one of the 4 key managerial components of a successful TM implementation, along with Enforcement, Protection and Restoration, and Evaluation. However, Education must also be considered an integral component of each one of the other components; Enforcement, Protection and Restoration, and Evaluation cannot be successful without Education.
This Education Plan provides an outline of the overarching Goals, Objectives, Target Audiences, Focus Areas, Action Plan, Tools and Safety considerations of the education function. This education plan tiers to the following two Tonto National Forest Documents: Draft Conservation Education Plan; and Draft Fire Prevention Plan.
Goals
The goal of the education function is to raise public awareness about the changes to motorized travel on the Tonto National Forest, gain public understanding and utilization of the MVUMs, work with key partners to gain public support and compliance, and assist with implementation of the forest’s travel management decisions. A key requirement in meeting this goal is to ensure the forest’s employees understand the motorized travel rules and their role in educating and communicating with forest visitors about TM.
Education Roles and Responsibilities
All Tonto National Forest employees share in the responsibility of implementing TM, including providing information and education to audiences including partners, local community members, special interest groups, and forest visitors. Education is the primary way to increase compliance with forest rules and regulations. All employees are expected to be part of the process of educating forest visitors about travel management.
Certain employees have specific roles in the Education function. • Tonto National Forest Public Affairs Officer: * o Provides advice and counsel to Tonto Leadership Team based on input from internal and external audiences. o Coordinate the development of informational/educational products and templates for internal and external distribution. o Manages content on Tonto internal and external websites for use by internal and external audiences.
Page 17 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
o Coordinate with the Regional PAO to ensure consistency in TM message content. o Coordinate with TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader. o Tracks overall forest Education/Communication effort – provides input for Annual TM Implementation Evaluation/Monitoring Report. o Coordinates Education/Communication outreach opportunities with adjacent forests. o Coordinates with other key managerial areas – Enforcement, Protection/Restoration, and Evaluation.
• District Rangers* o Advise Tonto Leadership Team based on input from internal and external audiences. Provide update on implementation projects. o Ensure open communication with district employees about travel management, roles and responsibilities. o Serve as primary local community liaisons.
• District Recreation Specialists* o Assist in developing and implementing Education action items. o Serve as primary district TM implementation representatives. o Coordinate Volunteer projects that assist with TM Implementation.
• Tonto National Forest Tribal Liaison: Serve as primary liaisons with tribal councils and tribal community members. o Advise Tonto TM Implementation Strategy Team and Leadership Team based on input from tribes.
• Tonto National Forest GIS: o Create mapping and information system products for use by internal and external audiences that aid in education and understanding.
• TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader: o Create a Share Point site for TM Implementation Strategy Team to utilize for internal information sharing; messages, calendar and finalized documents.
o Compile comment forms received from the public and provide to TMR Task Force for their biannual meetings.
o Oversee compilation of Annual TM Implementation Strategy Evaluation and Monitoring Report.
o Coordinate with TM Task Force and working group on Volunteer Projects and information sharing.
• Tonto National Forest Frontliners: (Roosevelt Lake Visitor Center and front desks at supervisor’s and ranger districts)
Page 18 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
o Serve as initial public contact for information. o Advise districts and Implementation Strategy Team of the kinds of input received from members of the public.
*TM Implementation Strategy Team Member – See Membership listing page 7.
Objectives of the Education Plan
• Forest users understand appropriate motorized use on the Tonto National Forest including designated routes, OHV areas, permit zones and motorized access corridors for big game retrieval and dispersed camping, designated campsites, and fuelwood gathering. • Forest users know how to get information on open routes. • Forest users understand the differences between OHV areas and permit zones. • Forest users know how to report violations of appropriate uses. • Youth are educated about why motorized uses need to be limited to the designated system (resource considerations). • Media provides accurate information about appropriate forest uses. • Forest employees know how to approach the public and are versed in key messages for helping people use the forest appropriately. • Target Audiences listed above in the Communication Plan (e.g., ATV clubs, outfitter and guides, concessionaires etc. understand the forest’s commitment to implementing the travel plan decision.
Target Audiences for Communication and Education Messages and Themes for each audience will be the same, but the depth of detail and information and delivery methods will vary. The five primary audiences are Internal, Partners, Local Community, Special Interest and Forest Visitors.
The following breakdown lists specific groups under each category:
1. Internal. This audience should receive information first because of the number of questions they may get from friends, acquaintances, neighbors and from the public during the course of their daily work and on personal time. This audience will include employees who participate in the forest Conservation Education and Fire Prevention programs.
2. Partners. The six districts on the Tonto National Forest can use the establishment of Forest MVUMs to continue working with partners that were important in the planning phases of travel management and to create new partnerships with other interested organizations.
Page 19 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Key partners for Tonto National Forest TMR Implementation include: a. Neighboring National Forests including the Prescott, Coconino and Apache Sitgreaves National Forests.
b. Other neighboring federal land agencies specifically the Tonto National Monument, and Agua Fria National Monuments of the Park Service, along with White Canyon Wilderness of the Tucson Field Office of the Bureau of Land Management, and Fish and Wildlife Service;
c. Tribal governments including the following: • San Carlos Apache Tribe • Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation • Yavapai-Prescott Tribe • Yavapai-Apache Nation • Tonto Apache Tribe • San Carlos Apache Tribe • White Mountain Apache Tribe • Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community • Gila River Indian Community • Hopi Tribe • Zuni Pueblo
d. County agencies such as Yavapai, Gila, Pinal, Maricopa, Coconino and Navajo County including McDowell Mountain Regional Park and Usery Mountain Recreation Area.
e. State agencies such as the Arizona Game and Fish Department, Arizona State Land Department, Arizona State Forestry Division, Arizona State Parks including Lost Dutchman and Tonto Natural Bridge State Parks, and Arizona OHV program. State groups include the following: • Arizona OHV Advisory Group Coordinator – (Jeff Prince) • Arizona Game and Fish OHV Coordinator (Mark Stewart) • Arizona State Committee on Trails Coordinator (Katie Valeros)
f. Interpretive Associations: including Northern Arizona Natural History Association.
3. Local Community. The seasonal nature of recreation on the two northern ranger districts (Payson and Pleasant Valley) can have impacts on the economy and economic development of gateway communities. Timely information ahead of potential issues within communities can maintain positive relations and provide for better cooperation in future events and activities around recreation areas. See Appendix C: Attachment 1- List of Target Audiences/Partners for Communication and Education Efforts.
Page 20 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
a. Urban City Officials. b. Rural Community Officials. c. County Officials including: Coconino, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, and Yavapai County Supervisors and representatives from each County Sheriff’s Department, Country trails and Resource Committees. d. Local and State elected officials. e. Travel and tourism association or board, convention and visitor bureaus. f. Local media: radio, newspaper, television. g. School children from the following school districts: Phoenix, Carefree, Cave Creek, Mesa, Fountain Hills, Scottsdale, Apache Junction, Globe, Miami, Payson, Superior, Young, Pine and Strawberry.
4. Special Interest. From motorized user groups to environmental groups, these groups will want detailed, specific information about the designated transportation network for the Tonto National Forest. a. Motorized Trail Rider groups b. Stock Organizations c. Conservation Preservation groups d. Local businesses including Off-road vehicle manufacturing and distribution outlets; sporting goods; e. Private Campground business. f. Nature, Wildlife groups.
5. Forest Visitors. All forest visitors and special use permit holders should be educated about the newly designed transportation network and prohibition on cross-country travel for their safety, awareness and commitment to compliance.
Tools
Tools used will vary by audience. The five primary audiences are Internal, Partners, Local Community, Special Interest Groups, and Forest Visitors. Some key Education tools are:
• The Tonto National Forest travel management page on Forest website, www.fs.usda.gov/goto/tonto/tmr • Share information on an internal website/Sharepoint site. • Informational/educational materials: Materials available on Tonto National Forest travel management internal website/Sharepoint site. • Employee meetings and all-employee orientation sessions. • Online comment form and hard-copy comment form. • Vehicle information packets produced from website/Sharepoint site information. • Talking Points, Key Messages, Questions & Answers.
Page 21 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
• AGFD email contact database. • Other agency websites. • Outdoor recreation vendors such that sell outdoor products and could carry MVUM maps.
A review of educational materials will allow the forest to determine when additional outreach and communication products are necessary.
Safety
Employee safety is the most important element to performing any kind of public contact activities. Employee safety should never be compromised when performing educational/informational duties. See Law Enforcement Plan Safety section of this document on page 33.
Focus Areas First Year after Decision
• Develop and distribute informational materials specific to Tonto National Forest TM • Training o Permanent and Seasonal Employees - Forest Wide o Partner, Local Community and Special Interest Group Training • MVUM development and distribution • Development of application to download Tonto National Forest MVUM on personal devices • Road and trail signing • Information kiosks in recreation sites • Field presence - presenting information regarding TM and MVUM • Inclusion of Tonto TMR information in Bureau of Land Management, Salt River Project, Tribal communities, National Park Service, Arizona Game & Fish, county/regional parks and Arizona State Parks publications and programs • Implementation and administration of permit zones and OHV areas • Update fuelwood permits regarding TM
Action Items for these Focus Areas are included in the Education Action Plan that is located in Appendix C.
Volunteer Assistance Opportunities
The Tonto Recreation Alliance (TRAL) is an Arizona non-profit corporation comprised of volunteer off-highway vehicle enthusiasts. The mission of the group is to provide educational and volunteer support to the Tonto National Forest. This is accomplished through the recruitment, training and management of groups of volunteers who work in cooperation with the forest on education of the general public about responsible off-highway vehicle use and resource conservation. The current focus is on the Mesa and the Cave Creek Ranger Districts. Volunteer projects provide volunteer help to improve and maintain designated roads and trails used by off-highway vehicles within the Tonto National Forest. TRAL has expressed Page 22 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy an interest in “adopting” some of the motorized trails designated during the Travel Planning process and assisting with TM implementation. The Off-Highway Vehicle Ambassador Program was initiated on the Cave Creek District of the Tonto National Forest in 2008. The state-wide program allows volunteers and their personal OHVs to help land agencies complete various work projects; including public education, trail maintenance and reconstruction, fence repair, visitor patrols and other possible projects. The OHVA Mission Statement: “A partnership of agencies and volunteers dedicated to enhancing motorized recreation opportunities and management in Arizona.” The Off-Highway Vehicle Ambassador (OHVA) Program may provide assistance in implementation of Travel Management on the Tonto National Forest and various work projects. Continuation of the Off- Highway Vehicle Ambassador program on the Cave Creek Ranger District and possible expansion to forest wide program is included within the Communication and Education Action Plan.
The Mesa Ranger District Sign Management Team consists of volunteers working in teams of two to inventory, assess condition, maintain signage, and repair information signs for fire prevention and recreation information kiosks. An opportunity exists to expand this program to the other districts on the forest.
When permit zone Analysis has been finalized there will be an opportunity for volunteer groups to assist with the construction of fences and barriers associated with the proposed permit zones on the Cave Creek and Mesa Ranger Districts.
The Forest looks forward to working with existing partners, the TM Implementation Task Force, and organizations interested in forming new partnerships to provide assistance in implementation of Travel Management.
Funding
CMTL, NFRW, and grant and partnership funding are the funding mechanisms that can be utilized for education efforts. A review of the TM implementation Strategy by each individual district needs to occur to evaluate funding opportunities.
Protection and Restoration
Protection and Restoration is one of the four key managerial components for a successful TM implementation, along with Education, Enforcement, and Evaluation. This plan outlines actions necessary regarding goals, responsibility, engineering tools, and safety. These efforts need to be integrated with education and enforcement efforts, and recreation program efforts through preparation of a Forest TM Implementation Strategy Sign Plan and a Restoration and Protection Strategy with input from field going personnel to adequately convey TM information to the public. Evaluation is critical for identifying problems and improving the road and trail transportation system and associated signage over time. The Protection Restoration Strategy component will be accomplished by multiple resources as described below.
Page 23 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Goals
The primary Restoration/Protection and Signing goals for TM implementation are as follows: (1) Ensure there is consistency between the roads databases (GIS and I Web/Infra, the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM), and features that physically exist on the ground (road sand signs).
(2) Ensure there is consistency between the trails databases (GIS and I Web/Infra, the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM), and features that physically exist on the ground (trail and signs).
(3) Develop and implement a TM Implementation Strategy Sign Plan that: • Informs the public of TM compliance requirements • Aids in orientation on the ground • Clearly identifies roads converted to system trails • Addresses safety issues • Considers consistency with other forests
(4) Develop Protection and Restoration Strategy that: • Specifies road and trail maintenance for designated routes • Identifies roads proposed for decommissioning • Identifies motorized routes proposed to convert to non-motorized trails • Identifies route signing, traffic barriers, route decommissioning, obliteration, and conversion of system road to motorized system trail.
(5) Evaluate and monitor the designated route system in order to identify changes needed to the MVUM during annual updates.
(6) Participation of engineering and recreation personnel on the TM Implementation Strategy Team and annual monitoring that identifies and assigns responsibility for resolution of internal and external issues that are encountered during the TM implementation process. See Appendix F Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Evaluation and Monitoring Plan.
(7) Ensure all field going employees have an understanding of the designated system, are able to explain the MVUM, and able to provide general TM compliance information and additional contact information if needed. Field going personnel will carry copies of the MVUM and informational handouts for distribution in the field.
Engineering/Recreation Roles and Responsibilities
Successful TM implementation will be achieved through the following engineering/recreation positions and general duties: •Engineering Staff Officer:
o Oversees TM Engineering implementation and operations. Page 24 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
•Civil Engineer Team Leader: *
o As Forest roads manager assists in oversight of TM implementation and operations. Participates on TM ID team, and serve on TM Implementation Strategy Team. Coordinate with Recreation Program. •Civil Engineering Roads Data Steward: * Updates and maintains roads GIS, ATM, and I-Web databases and serves on TM Implementation Strategy Team. • Forest Road Sign Coordinator:
o Coordinates with districts on road sign ordering and installation.
• Forest Trail Sign Coordinator: Assign one? o Coordinates with the districts and updates and maintains trails ATM (Access and Travel Management Module), I-Web databases and TMO’s (Trail Management Objectives)
• Forest Trail Data Steward: Assign one? Or combine Trail Data Steward and Sign Coordinator duties?* Updates and maintains trails GIS, ATM, and I-Web databases and serve on the TM Implementation Strategy Team
• Public Services Group Leader:
o Oversee TM Recreation Trails/Signing implementation and operations. Coordinate with Engineering Program.
• Recreation Planner: * o Serve as TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader overseeing the completion of the Tonto National Forest TMR Implementation Strategy and coordinating with Implementation Strategy Team Members and the TMR Implementation Strategy Task Force. • Landscape Architect: * o Oversees design of information kiosks and developed site signing. Serves on TM Implementation Strategy Team. o Provide input to and review Forest TM Implementation Sign Plan.
• GIS Specialist: *
o Produces Tonto National Forest MVUM and coordinates with TM Implementation Strategy Team on annual updates of MVUM. Serves on TM Implementation Strategy Team.
•District Personnel: Inform TM Implementation Strategy Team of inconsistencies between MVUM and signage/roads in the field, and internal or external TM issues encountered during the implementation process. Assist in coordinating District-wide TM projects and project related activities. Page 25 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
*TM Implementation Team Member – See Membership Listing above in TM Implementation Strategy Team pg. 7.
Tools
• Roads database software (GIS, I-Web, Road Management Objectives (RMOs)) • Trails database software (GIS, I-Web including ATM database, Trail Management Objectives (TMOs)) • TM Road Signage • Sign Installation Tracking Forms • Special Order Tracking Forms • MVUM • Informational kiosks • Road Condition/Sign Surveys • Public information brochures • Appendix D – ( Protection and Restoration Strategy and Sign Plan) • Interactive mapping platform to display specific locations of issues/concerns
Safety
• All travel management implementation operations will be performed in accordance with FSH 6709.11 Forest Service Health and Safety Code Handbook and all applicable OSHA standards.
• All field going personnel shall inform their supervisor, another employee, and/or dispatch of where they are going and when they are expected to return. See Appendix E Tonto National Forest Check-in Check-out Program, Safety section of the Law Enforcement Plan, and Tonto National Forest Safety Plan.
Funding
CMRD, CMTL, NFRW, and grant and partnership opportunities will fund Action Items within the Sign Plan. Grants and Partnerships opportunities should be expanded in this section. (Grant and partnership opportunities should be coordinated between SO and districts and support TM Implementation Strategy. Feb 28 is next State OHV grant application deadline, another coming in July)
Focus Areas First Year after Decision
See Appendix D that contains the Protection and Restoration Strategy, and Sign Plan for the Tonto National Forest for Travel Plan Implementation.
The following pre-work will be needed to complete the Action Items within the sign plan. • Field surveys to assess current conditions (signage, maintenance needs etc.) to validate/define the “objective level of service: for roads”
Page 26 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
• Review TRACS data and conduct field surveys to assess current condition of motorized trails. Design considerations for improving a road to meet higher standards (Level 2 4WD to passenger car vehicle.
Long Term Protection/Restoration Actions
Informally review the Tonto National Forest Recreation Facility Analysis (RFA) to identify needed facilities (additions and/or reductions) to accommodate changes in use from TM (trailheads, restrooms, information kiosks, etc.).
Construction of fences and barriers for permit zones on the Cave Creek and Mesa Ranger Districts will need to be installed when locations have been approved.
Enforcement
It is recognized to effectively implement TMR the following four management components are needed: Education, Protection and Restoration, Enforcement and Evaluation.
• Education- the public needs to know what the rules are • Protection/Restoration- placement of road and trail signs and obliteration of portions of closed roads • Enforcement- the consequence for violating the law • Evaluation- monitoring the resources and activity to address problems
This plan outlines the enforcement actions necessary for law enforcement regarding responsibility, tools for enforcement, goals and safety. In general, employees who have enforcement authority will use their discretion to use the appropriate tool based on the situation. All employees will focus on contacting and educating the public to inform them of the regulations. In addition, employees with enforcement authority will focus on cross- country travel as their primary issue. This plan identifies the goals, objectives, general approach, and funding for enforcement of current laws and implementation of TM.
Goals
Through internal and external cooperation, the goal of this plan is to:
Reduce the number of violations and gain compliance. It should be recognized that some individuals will choose to violate the regulation and will need to be held accountable. • Work with internal and external partners to prepare the public for the implementation of the TMR: Page 27 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
o Use Forest Service employees to inform and enforce existing motor vehicle laws. o Use saturation patrols to inform and enforce existing motor vehicle laws.
• During implementation of TM the forest will work with internal and external partners to ensure compliance with TM by: o Use Forest Service employees to inform and enforce changes under the TMR. o Use concentrated patrols to inform and enforce the TMR.
Gain support and active participation from state and local agencies.
Objectives
The objectives of the enforcement plan are: • Pre and Post TM o Use a suite of enforcement tools; such as: written and verbal warnings to violation notices, to ensure motor vehicle users are operating within the existing laws and TMR once it is implemented.
Roles and Responsibilities
• All Forest Service employees: o Have law enforcement responsibility, and depending on the level of training, determine how employees should respond. If employees have not been trained and certified to enforce rules and regulations, they should report violations to their supervisor, Forest Protection Officer or law enforcement Officer.
• Forest Protection Officers : o Have the authority and responsibility to contact TMR violators and use the appropriate enforcement tools available to them.
• Patrol Captain: * o The Patrol Captain will keep the Tonto LT updated on enforcement issues related to TM and provide direction for handling enforcement problems. Provide direction and input to the following: Law Enforcement Plan Saturation Patrols Education Plan Engineering Plan Evaluation and Monitoring Plan Annual Report MVUM updates Coordination with court system on violation notices issued
Page 28 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
• Law Enforcement Officers: o Have the authority and duty to contact violators and use appropriate enforcement tools available to them. Law Enforcement will coordinate with District Rangers, their staff and employees, providing direction with TM issues and planning saturation patrols. Law Enforcement will be the primary contact to coordinate with outside law enforcement agencies for saturation patrols. Law enforcement will propose that TM will be presented and discussed at the annual Forest Protection Officer training. (FPO topics are outlined and approved by the WO).
• Other non-Federal Law Enforcement Officers: o Have the authority to take action under state authority and statue to address TMR violations. These officers (e.g., AZ Game and Fish, Park Service, BLM, and State Parks) do not have an obligation to take enforcement action and will respond according to their department protocol.
• District Rangers, Recreation and Engineering Staffs and Implementation Strategy Team Leader o Will coordinate with law enforcement making employees available during busy and holiday weekends to conduct saturation patrols.
*TM Implementation Strategy Team Member – See Membership listing above on page 7.
General Approach
Employees and our partners are integral to the enforcement of existing laws leading to the implementation and enforcement of the TMR.
• Neighboring forests law enforcement including the Prescott, Coconino and Apache- Sitgreaves National Forests;
• Other neighboring federal land agencies specifically the Tonto and Agua Fria National Monuments of the Park Service, White Canyon Wilderness of the Tucson Field Office of the BLM and Fish & Wildlife Service;
• Gila, Maricopa, Pinal, Yavapai, Navajo and Coconino County Sheriffs’ Departments and local police departments;
• Tribal governments and law enforcement including the San Carlos Apache Tribe, Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation, Yavapai-Prescott Tribe, Yavapai-Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe, White Mountain Apache Tribe, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Gila River Indian Page 29 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Community, Hopi Tribe, and Zuni Pueblo.
• State agencies such as the Arizona Game and Fish Department, Arizona State Lands Department, Arizona State Park including Lost Dutchman and Tonto Natural Bridge Stat Parks.
• Internal participants: The Forest will utilize its law enforcement officers, Forest Protection Officers, Fire Prevention, as well as all other field going employees, specifically recreation and engineering employees who will forward information to law enforcement.
• Forest law enforcement officers in coordination with District Rangers will coordinate concentrated Enforcement and Education events. . Enforcement and education events consist of internal and external participants focusing enforcement and education efforts at predetermined high use areas and during high use times across the Forest. . The spirit of the enforcement and education events is to contact motor vehicle users and provide education material regarding safe and responsible OHV use, the legal requirements for OHV on Forest Service lands, and when necessary use of the enforcement tools. • District staff and rangers will coordinate weekend patrols of Forest Protection Officers, Fire Prevention and recreation employees. . The primary focus of weekend patrols will be education followed by enforcement. . Weekend patrols will provide users with a Forest Service presence. . Weekend patrols should be focused during times of high use, keeping the safety of Tonto National Forest employees and users as a priority.
Education is the primary methodology of ensuring compliance with forest rules and regulations. However, education efforts do not always ensure compliance and violations notices must sometimes be issued. The following are considerations when deciding if a violation notice needs to be issued to a forest visitor. • Intent of the individual’s action. Employees should consider the individual’s intent, and determine if the action was driven by ignorance of the law or misunderstanding of the law. For example, did the individual pull off of a road to park at a safe distance to avoid causing an accident (a few feet), or did the individual travel an excessive distance off a designated route?
• Assessment of individual’s knowledge of forest laws and regulations. Some forest laws and regulations are common sense behavior issues and are well known, Page 30 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
while others are not. When considering issuing a violation notice, employees should take into account the visitor’s knowledge of the forest, the presence of signage and/or education materials, and previous contact with Forest Service employees or volunteers. For example, has the visitor frequently visited the forest and therefore should know the rules; did the individual drive by a ―do not drive on meadow‖ sign; was the individual contacted recently by a forest employee? In addition, some consideration should be given to the duration of existence of the laws or regulations being violated. For example, was motorized travel off designated routes previously prohibited in this area?
• Need for an incident report. Even if a violation notice is not issued, an incident report should be completed. This form includes a copy of the written documentation of the incident that can be provided to the violator. It does not carry a penalty and does not become part of a permanent record, but serves as a reminder to the violator of the regulations and that we are keeping track of these incidents, and may serve as a future deterrent.
36 CFR 261.13 is the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) number to be used by employees when writing violation notices for laws/rules imposed under the TMR. Note that a critical Element in this regulation is that the designated routes must be identified on a Motor Vehicle Use map: Sec. 261.13 Motor Vehicle Use. After National Forest System roads, National Forest System trails, and areas on National Forest System lands have been designated pursuant to 36 CFR 212.51 on an administrative unit or a Ranger District of the National Forest System, and these designations have been identified on a Motor Vehicle Use Map, it is prohibited to possess or operate a motor vehicle on National Forest System lands in that administrative unit or Ranger District other than in accordance with those designations, provided that the following vehicles and uses are exempted from this prohibition: (a) Aircraft; (b) Watercraft; (c) Over-snow vehicles; (d) Limited administrative use by the Forest Service; (e) Use of any fire, military, emergency, or law enforcement vehicle for emergency purposes; (f) Authorized use of any combat or combat support vehicle for national defense purposes; (g) Law enforcement response to violations of law, including pursuit; (h) Motor vehicle use that is specifically authorized under a written authorization issued under Federal law or regulations; and (i) Use of a road or trail that is authorized by a legally documented right-of-way held by a State, county or other local public road authority.
If the decision is made to issue a violation notice, the following information is needed to Page 31 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
prosecute the case: • A good Probable Cause (PC) statement (who, what, when, where, why, and how) is necessary to prosecute a violation. If PC statements do not include all the necessary information the case may be dropped. A long story does not need to be written, but all of the facts that led the employee to writing the citation should be articulated well. What the suspect says is very powerful information that should be included in the PC statement.
• A picture is worth a thousand words! Take pictures of pertinent signs in the area; pictures of the damages from the individuals going off a designated route; pictures of the motor vehicle off a designated route; any images that may help explain the reason the violation was issued. If the case goes to trial, often the prosecutor will want pictures of the violation, resulting damage, and the areas the violation occurred in. Employees should take as many pictures as possible of useful elements of the case. Although it is important to take pictures, employees need to be respectful of the individual.
Tools
TM implementation will bring about a change in how the public uses the Tonto National Forest. During the first years of implementation, it is critical that forest employees demonstrate the Forest Service’s commitment to the success of the TMR by contacting the public at every opportunity and providing accurate information about the new travel regulations and the Tonto National Forest MVUM.
All forest employees have a responsibility to maintain the positive image of the Forest Service with forest users and our local communities. When contacting the public, employees should act as ―Good hosts for national forest system lands. Avoid confrontation with users or community members. If problems arise during public contacts, contact line officer or forest law enforcement.
All employees should strive to make contacts with the public during the normal course of their field duties. Even an employee conducting a field survey should take the time to speak to a member of the public if the opportunity is available. Violations do not have to be observed in order to make a contact. Most forest users have questions about the forest and are glad when someone representing the Forest Service stops to talk with them.
Safety
Employee safety is the most important element to performing law enforcement activities. All employees are responsible for their own safety and must follow Forest Service Handbook policy and direction and the Tonto National Forest Safety Plan. Many aspects of this document pertain to safety, including the communication plan and training requirements. Never compromise employee safety when performing law enforcement activities. Employees who Page 32 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
feel uncomfortable making field contact for either educational or enforcement purposes should refrain from being placed in this position.
Make sure supervisor, another employee or dispatch knows where you are going and what time you will return. Follow protocols including the use of Spot devices established within the Tonto National Forest Check-in and Check-out program as part of the forest check-in check out policy. See Appendix E.
It is required that all employees have adequate communication capabilities when performing law enforcement activities. Due to poor cell phone coverage in most areas of the forest, Forest Service radios are necessary to meet the adequate communications requirements.
All employees must know how to operate Forest Service radios. Training on operation should include, but is not limited to, proper maintenance, selecting appropriate tones, selecting appropriate repeaters, appropriate and effective communications, how to communicate with the county, and the ability to identify when a radio transmission is reaching a repeater.
Forest Protection Officers are required by policy to be in full Forest Service uniform including badge, nameplate and driving a marked Forest Service vehicle when taking enforcement action. Forest Protection Offices need to adhere to FSM5301.61, Limitations on Forest Protection Officers. Always remember: there is nothing so important that you have to react to that would jeopardize your safety.
Saturation Patrols
In an attempt to maximize the efforts of the limited number of law enforcement employees on the forest, saturation patrols will be routinely executed. A saturation patrol is a procedure in which a number of law enforcement patrol units are dedicated to a limited geographic area for the purpose of creating law enforcement presence. Saturation patrols are concentrated enforcement efforts that focus on the distribution of education materials and enforcement of forest laws and regulations. In addition, saturation patrols provide additional safety to employees when making forest visitor contacts and issuing citations.
Enforcement efforts need to be conducted forest-wide, however additional patrols and law enforcement/education presence will be focused on resource protection and enforcing the prohibition on cross-country travel. Target locations will be identified, prioritized, and patrols scheduled.
Training Needs
All employees should know the background legislation, planning process, and subsequent implications of the Tonto National Forest Travel Management Decision. More information Page 33 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
is provided in the Education section beginning on page 17.
MOUs with Other Law Enforcement Agencies
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) already exists between the Federal agencies Arizona. Federal type 1 officers (not FPOs) can stop on another agencies land and deal with a violation in progress. This MOU does not state that a BLM officer will go on a planned routine patrol on the forest. This MOU is set up for officers to deal with situations when encountered when crossing other agencies land or something is observed where no other officers are available.
Special Orders
Seasonal and emergency road closures or area closures may be necessary and are up to Forest Supervisor discretion.
Funding
Employees who are not directly funded for Law Enforcement, Forest Protection Officer or Fire Prevention duties will need to be adequately funded and enabled to participate in implementation of the travel management decision on the Tonto National Forest.
• District Rangers and Staff will encourage employees to participate in weekend patrols, enforcement and education events.
Evaluation – Monitoring and Performance Reporting
While Evaluation (or Monitoring) is the last element for TM implementation, it is an integral part of Education, Protection and Restoration, and Enforcement. Each element has a monitoring component to insure the process is dynamic and constantly improved upon. This plan outlines a strategy for evaluating the effectiveness of management efforts regarding implementation of TM.
Goal
The goal of the evaluation or monitoring strategy is to provide a framework for the collection and evaluation of information received to guide management changes relative to motorized use; assign responsibility for the resolution of the issues and comments; and track resolutions to the problems on the Tonto National Forest.
Page 34 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Roles and Responsibilities
All employees will focus on contacting and educating the public to inform them of the regulation, and to provide several options for commenting on this process. Monitoring tracks successes and areas needing improvement on a continuing basis.
Appendix F contains the Evaluation and Monitoring Action Plan for the Tonto National Forest. This plan identifies Monitoring questions and person responsible for collecting and evaluating monitoring information. The TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader will be responsible to compile this information into an annual Monitoring Report to present to the Leadership Team and TM Task Force.
Tools
The tools available for monitoring and evaluation consist of: • Comment forms/e-mails/personal and written communications/phone calls/in-person contacts (from frontliners, Implementation Strategy Team and Task Force, media interest and coverage, and internet hits. • Roads database and Road Management Objectives (RMO) • Trails database and Trail Management Objectives (TMO) • LEIMARS (Law Enforcement Information Management and Reporting System) database • Updated MVUMs • GPS roads layer • GPS Trails layer • Tracking spreadsheets • Meeting notes (TM Implementation Strategy Team and Leadership Team) Identify the issues highlighted and the changes made • Interactive mapping showing locations of specific issues, concerns, incidents
Safety
Employees conducting TM Implementation Strategy monitoring (i.e., engineers, recreation, public affairs, law enforcement) will conduct public contacts while out in the field. Therefore, this on-the-ground work will follow Forest Service Handbook Policy, direction within the Tonto National Forest Safety Plan and Forest Check-in Check-out Policy.
Funding
The execution of the Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Plan will be an expensive, multi-year commitment. The forest plans to fund the project within a number of fund codes including: Recreation (NFRW); Roads (CMRD); Trails (CMTL); Wildlife (NFWF); Vegetation and Watershed (NFWV); National Forest Resource Restoration (NFRR). The forest will
Page 35 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
explore grant, partnership, and volunteer opportunities to assist with all components of the implementation effort.
Accomplishments
The forest will accomplish targets in multiple program areas during the implementation process. Because the targets are resource specific (e.g., Recreation, Roads, Trails, etc.) and not all implementation areas will involve all resource areas, target accomplishment will vary annually between programs. Targets attached to the Forest’s annual budget that may be accomplished during the TM implementation process are as follows: Recreation (NFRW): o Number of interpretive and conservation education plans implemented
Roads (CMRD): o Miles of road maintained to standard o Miles of road decommissioned
Trails (CMTL): o Miles of trail improved to standard o Miles of trail maintained to standard
There is an opportunity for the districts and partners to pursue grant funding to support volunteer monitoring efforts.
Performance Standards
Route and Area Designations Managed to Standard
Starting FY 2015, the Tonto National Forest will annually report route and area designations managed to standard . An example of the route and area designations performance measures and reporting is located in Appendix A - Attachment 1. This TM Implementation Strategy contains all the components identified within these new performance standards and within the R-3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy.
Appendix F contains the Evaluation and Monitoring Action Plan for the Tonto National Forest. The information compiled within the Action items identified in this plan will be incorporated into the Annual Evaluation and Monitoring Report. This report will provide information to identify focus areas and key themes and messages to update the Implementation Strategy and identify Action Plan updates for each component of the strategy for the following year.
The number of violation notices issued per the contacts made during Saturation Patrols Page 36 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy is proposed as the evaluation measure for compliance with MVUM. This data will contain a certain amount of bias, since the contacts initiated for enforcement purposes are made in situations where enforcement/education is anticipated.
Page 37 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Acronyms
ATM Access and Travel Management Module CFR Code of Federal Regulations DEIS Draft Environmental Impact Statement EA Environmental Analysis EIS Environmental Impact Statement EM Engineering Manual 4FRI Four Forest Restoration Initiative FPO Forest Protection Officer GIS Geographic Information System GPS Global Positioning System INFRA Infrastructure Database ITM Interactive Travel Map LEIMARS Law Enforcement Investigation Management Attainment Reporting System LEO Law Enforcement Officer MOU Memorandum of Understanding MVUM Motor Vehicle Use Map NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFS - National Forest System OHV Off-Highway Vehicle OHVA Off-Highway Vehicle Ambassadors PAO Public Affairs Officer PC Probable Cause R-3 Southwestern Region 3 ROD Record of Decision RMO Road Management Objective RFA Recreation Facility Analysis TMO Trail Management Objective TM Travel Management TMR Travel Management Rule TRACS Trail Assessment and Condition Surveys TRAL Tonto Recreation Alliance
Page 38 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Glossary of Terms
Administrative use only (Admin Use): Motorized access is restricted, often with a locked gate, to Forest Service personnel or those that hold an authorized special use permit to access the road or trail. These routes would not show up on the Motor Vehicle Use Map. Motorized users not authorized to be on these routes would be cited for being in violation.
Annual maintenance: Work performed to maintain serviceability or repair failures during the year in which they occur. Includes preventive and/or cyclic maintenance performed in the year in which it is scheduled to occur. Unscheduled or catastrophic failures of components or assets may need to be repaired as a part of annual maintenance.
Decommissioned (roads or trails): The demolition, dismantling, removal, obliteration, and /or disposal of a deteriorated or otherwise unneeded asset or component. This includes necessary cleanup work. This action eliminates the deferred maintenance needs for the fixed asset. Portions of an asset or component may remain, if they do not cause problems or require maintenance.
Deferred maintenance: Maintenance activities that can be delayed without critical loss of facility serviceability until the work can be economically or efficiently performed.
Designated road, trail, or area: A National Forest System road, a National Forest System trail, or an area on National Forest System lands that is designated for motor vehicle use pursuant to (36 CFR 212.51) on a Motor Vehicle Use Map.
Maintenance: The upkeep of the entire forest transportation facility including surface and shoulders, parking and side areas, structures, and such traffic-control devices, as are necessary for its safe and efficient utilization (36 CFR 212).
Maintenance levels: The Forest Service currently classifies maintenance of National Forest System roads by five maintenance levels. According to the Tonto National Forest Plan, they are defined as follows: • Level 1: Roads are not open to traffic; they are maintained to protect the road investment and its surrounding resources. These roads may be opened for a specific activity and returned to Level 1 upon completion of the project. • Level 2: Roads are maintained open for limited passage of traffic. Roads in this maintenance level are primitive type facilities intended for high clearance vehicles. Passenger car traffic is not a consideration. • Level 3: Roads are maintained open and safe for travel by a prudent driver in a passenger car. However, user comfort and convenience is not considered a priority. • Level 4: Roads are maintained to provide a moderate degree of user comfort and convenience at moderate travel speeds. • Level 5: Roads are maintained to provide a high degree of user comfort and convenience. These roads are normally two lanes with aggregate or paved surface. Page 39 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
See Appendix D and Attachment 1 of the Protection and Restoration Strategy.
Motorized Big Game Retrieval Corridor: Defined by the TMR as “the designation of the limited use of motorized vehicles within a specified distance of certain designated routes, and if appropriate within specified time periods, solely for the purpose of … retrieval of a downed big game animal by an individual who has legally taken that animal:” (36 CRR 212.51 (b)).
Motorized Dispersed Camping Corridor: Defined by the TMR as “the designation of the limited use of motorized vehicles within a specified distance of certain designated routes, and if appropriate within specified time periods, solely for the purpose of dispersed camping.”
Motor Vehicle: Any vehicle which is self-propelled, other than: (1) a vehicle operated on rails; and (2) any wheelchair or mobility device, including one that is battery-operated, that is designed solely for use by a mobility-impaired person for locomotion, and that is suitable for use in an indoor Pedestrian area (36 CFR 212).
Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM): the legal tool for the Forest Service to comply with and enforce the USDA's Travel Management Rule. While widely regarded as specific to off highway vehicles, it actually covers the public motorized transportation system of all Forest Service roads and motorized trails on a Forest. The map itself is black and white, with little reference information, can be a variety of different dimensions, with different folding patterns, and is available in both hardcopy format at ranger stations and visitor centers and in digital (pdf) format on forest websites.
National Forest System road: A forest road other than a road which has been authorized by a legally documented right-of-way held by a State, county, or other local public road authority (36 CFR 212).
National Forest System trail: A forest trail other than a trail which has been authorized by a legally documented right-of-way held by a state, county or other local public authority (36 CFR 212).
OHV Area: The Travel rule defines and area as a discrete, specifically delineated space that is smaller, and in most cases much smaller, than a Ranger District. An area may be designated open for motorized cross-country travel.
Obliteration: A form of decommissioning that recontours and restores natural slopes on roads or trails.
Permit Zone: Motorized vehicle users are required to obtain a permit to access the zone which has a locked gate and barriers restricting non-permitted access. Motorized cross-country travel is prohibited within a permit zone and visitors traveling in a motorized vehicle must stay on designated routes.
Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS): a land classification system which categorizes National Forest land into six classes, each class being defined by its setting and by the probable recreation experiences and activities it affords. The six classes in the spectrum are: primitive, semi-primitive non-motorized, semi-primitive motorized, roaded natural, rural, and urban as defined in the Tonto National Forest Plan. Page 40 of 41
DRAFT Tonto National Forest TM Implementation Strategy
Road Management Objective: Documentation of the intended purpose of an NFS road based on management area direction and access management objectives; enumerating design, operation, and maintenance criteria and documenting traffic management strategies for each vehicle class and season of use, if applicable, on an NFS road. It also documents forest orders and permits associated with the road
Route: A road or trail.
Single Track Trails: Tread width is generally from 18 inches to 60 inches. Designate use can be for hiker pedestrian, pack and saddle, bicycle, or motorcycle.
Trail: A route 50 inches or less in width or a route over 50 inches wide that is identified and managed as a trail (36 CFR 212).
Trail Class: Trail classes (1-5) are general categories reflecting trail development scale, arranged along a continuum. The Trail Class identified for a National Forest System (NFS) trail prescribes its development scale, representing its intended design and management standards. Local deviations from any Trail Class description may be established based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations do no undermine the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. See Appendix D - Protection and Restoration Strategy.
Trail Management Objective: (TMOs) are fundamental building blocks for trail management. TMOs tier from and reflect forest plan, travel management and/or trail-specific management direction. TMOs synthesize and document, in one convenient place, the management intention for the trail, and provide basic reference information for subsequent trail planning, management, condition surveys, and reporting.
Trailhead: The transfer point between a trail and a road, water body, or airfield, which may have developments that facilitate transfer from one mode of transportation to another.
Travel Management Rule: Published on November 9, 2005, TMR “provides for a system of NFS roads, trails, and areas on NFS lands that are designated for motor vehicle use…Moto vehicle use off designated roads and trails and outside of designated areas is prohibited”. (36 CFR212.50)
Unauthorized route: A road or trail that is not a forest system road or trail or a temporary road or trail and that is not included in a forest transportation atlas (36 CFR 212.1).
Page 41 of 41
Appendix A Region 3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy
DRAFT—November 8, 2013
Introduction
On November 9, 2005, the Forest Service published a final travel management rule (TMR) governing the use of OHVs and other motor vehicles on National Forest System lands. The final rule requires each national forest provide a system of roads, trails and areas on NFS lands that are designated for motor vehicle use. Once designation is complete on a national forest or ranger district and a motor vehicle use map (MVUM) is published, use of motor vehicles will only be allowed on roads, trails and areas designated on the MVUM.
The purpose of the Region 3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy (Strategy) is to assist forests in effectively and sustainably implementing TMR decisions, to identify regional expectations for TM implementation to gain greater consistency among forests, and to ensure Forests are able to meet the new performance measure, effective in FY14 (Appendix A). http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/implementation/designations.shtml It is intended to tier to the National Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide, and to supplement forest-level implementation plans that provide specific direction for Forest TM teams.
When developing implementation plans, forests should refer to the Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Guide). The Guide provides much information on what forests should consider when developing implementation plans, in addition to providing many resources and references. This strategy supplements the Guide with regional expectations, in addition to highlighting aspects of the Guide to gain greater consistency among forests.
The national economic conditions and mounting financial demands facing the nation underscore the inadequacy of traditional funding mechanisms utilized by the Forest Service. We can no longer rely solely on Forest Service appropriations and personnel to implement travel management decisions. Strategic partnerships, citizen stewards, and use of volunteers are vital to the successful and sustainable implementation of travel management.
At a minimum, implementation plans must include an education/communication and monitoring strategy, and should include a sign plan and potential funding sources.
To assist with successful implementation of travel management implementation, the Regional Travel Management Coordinator (currently Kyung Koh, [email protected], 505-842- 3451) will host monthly conference calls (second Tuesday at 10am NM time) with all Southwestern Region forests.
1
The section headings below are in accordance with the National Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/implementation/designations.shtml), and the performance measure (Appendix A). Remember, education alone cannot ensure successful implementation of travel management decisions and designations. Education should be integrated with engineering, enforcement and evaluation.
EDUCATION/COMMUNICATION Regional expectations: • Each forest will have an education/communication strategy (targeting both internal and external audiences) at the time of decision, or at least within one year of publishing the initial MVUM. o Education/communication strategy for external audiences should emphasize the need to put more effort towards face-to-face communication with the public. o Education/communication may include outreach strategies for limited English proficiency users. • Forest Service external website is kept current and fully utilized by regional office and forests to communicate accurate and current information regarding travel management (TM) implementation. External websites should also provide links to TM/MVUM sites of neighboring forests, or of all forests in the Region. External web sites must meet web accessibility requirements. • Supplemental products, or travel aids, may be developed to educate and aid the public in understanding travel management designations. o The Travel Management Rule requires us to make MVUMs available to the public. Thus, work on supplemental products should not hinder or take priority over the MVUM. Digital travel aids are suggested over additional hard copy travel aids. See Appendix B for more information on travel aids. • The corporate database should reflect TM decisions made. This will help forests become more efficient in publishing MVUMs annually. Each forest should ensure: 1) their data complies with established data standards, 2) their data reflects Subpart B decisions and 3) future MVUMs can be generated with spatial and tabular data (which includes the GIS spatial data in SDE and tabular data in Infra, including data in the ATM module). o For consistency, forests must post all MVUM related files, i.e., .mxd, .gdb, .eps, .pdf files here: T:\ FS\NFS\Forest name\Program\7700TravelMgmt\GIS\ MVUM_Published • MVUMs must be re-issued1 each year. The designations shown on the MVUM are effective as of the date stamped or printed on the front cover and will remain in effect until superseded by the next year’s motor vehicle use map. MVUMs must be available
1Re-issued does not necessarily mean re-printed. Re-issued simply means that a current MVUM must be available for the current year. If forests make changes to designations, they should make a new MVUM available to the public. However, if a forest does not make any changes to the designations, they may simply change the year on the MVUM to reflect the current year.
2
free of charge, both on the internet and in hard copy, at forest headquarters and ranger district offices. o Process for initial printing, reprinting and RO review of the MVUM is outlined in the MVUM Preparation and Review Process document (Appendix C). Allow 5 week for reprints. . RO review is required for all MVUMs. See MVUM Preparation and Review Process document for more information. . Each forest should track changes to the MVUM with a change log.
PROTECTION/RESTORATION AND SIGNING (ENGINEERING) Also refer to the National Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Guide). Regional expectations: • Each Unit should have a sign plan. The sign plan should include an installation schedule. o All units must implement and comply with existing agency sign policy, standards and guidelines when signing for implementation of the TMR. o Sign plans should include an inventory of all TM related signs installed, as well as a replacement plan for those signs. • At a minimum, all designated routes displayed on the MVUM must be clearly marked on the ground with the appropriate route marker, and at appropriate intervals, by the time the MVUM is released. • Signing all routes as either open or closed is not consistent with current sign policy or guidelines and is unnecessary to fulfill the requirements of the TMR. Units are not to use such signing. • Travel management signs and decals may be used to draw attention to certain motor vehicle restrictions: o In trespass or other problem areas with poor compliance from the public when other methods are ineffective o For educational purposes when the restriction or prohibition is new to the public o When a route has been open historically to motor vehicles o To avoid confusion with other prohibitions on non-motorized, mechanized or over snow use o To provide reassurance to the public as needed
ENFORCEMENT Refer to the National Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Guide). There are no additional regional expectations.
EVALUATION Refer to the National Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Guide). Regional expectations: • Forests (units) must monitor effects of motor vehicle use on designated roads, trails and in designated areas, and must revise designations as necessary. o Forests should document changes to the MVUM in a change log (see Education/Communication section for more information)
3
OTHER • Forests should keep track of roads used for administrative purposes in Infra and in the ATM module. o Forests may create a navigational tool that displays admin roads (for internal use only) • Motorized cross-country travel to facilitate the gathering of forest products, i.e. fuelwood, will be managed by the forest products permit system. The permit issued for the gathering of forest products must specify what, if any, motorized cross- country travel is authorized for the purpose of gathering those products.
REFERENCES Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Updated April 2012) http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/implementation/designations.shtml There are many references/resources in this Guide.
MVUM Production Guide http://fsweb.mvum.fs.fed.us/step-3.php
Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/htmlpubs/em7100-15/toc.htm
Region 3 RHWR Travel Management (internal) http://fsweb.r3.fs.fed.us/rec/TravelMgmt/
List of Attachments Attachment 1: Route and Area Designations Managed to Standard Attachment 2: Travel Aids Attachment 3: MVUM Preparation and Review Process
4
Region 3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy Appendix A
Attachment 1
ROUTE AND AREA DESIGNATIONS MANAGED TO STANDARD This performance measure will be required for FY14 and involves identifying whether or not six tasks have been completed by answering “Yes” or “No” for each. Completion of all tasks shows that a unit is managing route and area designations “to standard.” Accomplishment would be expressed as “this unit is managing route and area designations at x % percent of standard.” Targets; FY13- Regions should use these performance measures to gain a baseline and report to the WO OHV Program Manager. FY14 = 50% (3 of 6 = yes). FY15 =-83% (5 of 6 = yes). FY16 = 100% (6 of 6 = yes).
It is strongly recommended that each forest develop an overarching Implementation Plan that incorporates these six tasks. For more guidance on implementing this performance measures, refer to the Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide.
Education/Communication Strategy 1. An education/communication strategy which addresses route and area designations has been identified, and actions are implemented consistent with schedule identified in strategy. Yes/No
2. MVUM has been reviewed and reissued consistent with production guide requirements, within the past year. Current Infra, GIS, and ATM data was used. If no MVUM, a map is available displaying current publicly available motor vehicle opportunities. Yes/No
Protection/Restoration and Signing 3. Sign plan is in place which addresses designated routes and areas, and signs are installed consistent with schedule identified in sign plan. Yes/No
4. Protection and restoration strategy has been developed, and actions are implemented consistent with identified schedule. Yes/No
Enforcement 5. Patrols are performed during peak use periods for compliance with MVUM, or current relevant orders if no MVUM. Yes/No
Evaluation 6. Monitoring strategy has been developed, and monitoring is performed according to identified schedule, collected information is evaluated, and recommended changes made to responsible official. Yes/No
*** NOTE *** For those units which have not yet produced a MVUM, references to “route and area designations” should be interpreted to mean those roads, trails, and areas that are currently legally open to the public for motor vehicle use. The following Table will be used to report Travel Planning Performance Measures starting FY-13.
5
Form used for 2013 reporting Forest Meeting Education/ Protection/ Performance Communication Sign Plan Restoration Region Forest Measures Strategy Completed MVUM completed Completed Strategy Completed Enforcement Monitoring
3 Apache-Sitgreaves 0%
3 Carson 0%
3 Cibola 0%
3 Coconino 0%
3 Coronado 0%
3 Gila 0%
3 Kaibab 0%
3 Lincoln 0%
3 Prescott 0%
3 Santa Fe 0%
3 Tonto 0%
TOTAL 0 0 0 0 0 0 Region percent meeting Performance Measures 0%
6
Region 3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy Appendix A Attachment 2 - TRAVEL AIDS
Generally, travel aids produced to supplement MVUMs fall into in two broad categories: digital and printed media. The tables below include suggested travel aids, and are based on the following facts.
1. All travel aids are new/additional products. Production of travel aids does not remove other map products from the workload. MVUMs and Forest Visitor Maps must still be produced. 2. Production costs and times accrued by the producing unit account for the time from when work on the new product starts, to when the product is printed/posted. Estimates are based on similar products produced in this or other regions. 3. Any map produced for public consumption will have to go through the Regional Printing Specialist to be edited for format and content before going to press. Regional Printing Specialist time is not accounted for below 4. Map sales money may not be used to produce a map that is not in the map sales program.
DIGITAL TRAVEL AIDS
Product Production Product Notes Cost Time Longevity PDFs of - - Out of date This is the minimum required. It is current MVUM upon MVUM generated as part of normal MVUM revision production, though some modification may be necessary. Georeferenced - - Out of date As above if MVUM is produced in ArcGIS. PDFs of upon MVUM (Some modification may be necessary). current MVUM revision GeoTiffs of - - Out of date As above if MVUM is produced in ArcGIS. current MVUM upon MVUM (Some modification may be necessary). revision Interactive - - As long as ITM is maintained by Geospatial Service Travel Map MVUM data is and Technology Center (GSTC). Forests (ITM) maintained would link to their site. http://sxgstcgis002.ds.fs.fed.us/TravelAcces s/ Custom digital Salary/ (=>) 40 Out of date May have to be revised yearly map Contract hrs upon MVUM revision
Custom app Salary/ Unknown Requires This in effect creates a new unfunded development Contract constant program of work. maintenance as device Operating Systems update
7
PRINTED TRAVEL AIDS
Product Production Product Notes Cost Time Longevity Atlas Products Salary/ Varies. Out of date Moderate to high print costs on top of Contract+ No fewer upon MVUM extremely long production time. Potentially Printing than => revision short lifespan.Can be cumbersome in digital (17-35K) 200 hrs format. 17K will print about 2500 Atlases.
Fold-out Salary/ Varies. Out of date Moderate to high print costs on top of Products Contract+ No fewer upon MVUM production time. Potentially short lifespan. Printing than => revision 20K will print about 7500 maps. (15-50K) 40 hrs For Free As above As above Out of date Every region that has made printed travel Products upon MVUM aids available has lost funding for these tools revision. after 1-3 years. Funding from outside sources has short lifespan For Sale As above As above Out of date Map sales money would cover every printing Products upon MVUM after the initial printing. Travel aids would revision become a part of the regional cartographic program of work.
*Note: Will need to include parameters around printed travel aids, so that the Region is consistent on what we produce and make available to the public. Will include here when we have these parameters, which would include the need to conform to National map standards. Currently discussing in the RO.
8
Region 3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy Appendix A
Attachment 3
Travel Management Motor Vehicle Use Map Preparation and Review Process Southwestern Region
August 22, 2013
This document outlines the process for developing the motor vehicle use map (MVUM) geodatabase and preparing the MVUM for printing and publication.
The Regional Office travel management (TM) team involved in MVUM preparation, review, printing and publication include: Kyung Koh, Recreation Planner/Travel Management Lead Marjorie Apodaca, Transportation Engineering Group Leader Candace Bogart, GIS Program Manager Rick Crawford, GIS Analyst Pete Martinez, Supervisory Cartographer Ernest Seiger, Cartographer Patricia Johnson, RO Printing Specialist
A. Data Development and Creation of the MVUM GIS Database
The Forest edits and updates spatial and tabular databases, with assistance from RO GIS staff and RO Engineering staff as needed, and then links the spatial and tabular data. The databases used to create the MVUM are the foundation for the final paper product. All corrections and updates to the Infra database should reflect the final TMR decisions, so that those decisions are reflected in the final MVUM document.
Follow guidance established in Regional and/or National Data Dictionaries when editing base data. For roads, use the National Travel Routes and ATM Data Dictionaries, which can be found here: http://fsweb.r6.fs.fed.us/eng/travel_routes/user_board/
The Travel Route Guidebook for GIS for the Southwestern Region, which describes the ArcGIS processes for editing routes and linking them to Route Event Data, can be found here: http://fsweb.r3.fs.fed.us/eng/gis/arcgis_tools_10/
Questions on this step that cannot be resolved by the Forest TM team should be directed to Rick Crawford, Candace Bogart, or Marjorie Apodaca.
9
B. Preparation of the Motor Vehicle Use Map
The Forest should prepare the MVUM following the guidance in the MVUM Production Guide. Direct any questions concerning the quality and accuracy of Infra Road data to Marjorie Apodaca, Trails Infra data to Dennis Garcia, and GIS content and processes to Rick Crawford.
Direct any questions related to the base map production and MVUM template (e.g. symbology and standards, size of map, placement of collar information, folding, fonts, tables, etc.) to Ernie Seiger.
The MVUM Production Guide (http://fsweb.mvum.fs.fed.us/step-3.php) provides direction on how to create the MVUM, outlines where standardized information must be included, and addresses the very limited situations where information may be customized (i.e. seasonal and special designations, and blanket statements regarding big game retrieval and dispersed camping). The MVUM Production Guide also contains information on how the spatial data is linked, and directions on ancillary information that is contained on the map including naming conventions, reference data and overall mapping content. The template has been developed for national consistency and no deviations are permitted without prior approval from the RO. Questions concerning how to communicate specific TM objectives, or unique or local circumstances should be directed to Kyung Koh.
In addition, the RO team will review the Forest’s spatial data in SDE and the tabular data to verify the overall data consistency reflected in the MVUM.
Region 3 standards for MVUM production not addressed in the MVUM Production Guide include:
• A ¼-inch margin is to be applied on either side of the MVUM’s vertical fold lines.
• When creating an MVUM using a 4-inch x 9-inch fold, the length of the side that the 4- inch fold is applied to must be a multiple of 4 inches, no tail is allowed. If the side that the 9-inch fold is applied to has a tail, then that tail may not be shorter than 3 inches.
• For the Datum and Projection note, please edit appropriately and apply as follows: North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83) Projection and 10,000-meter grid: Universal Transverse Mercator, Zone 12
• The date of MVUM is determined by the Forest and should be approximately 5 weeks after the date it will be sent in to the RO per section D below. This will allow sufficient time for printing, distributing to unit(s), and posting on the forest’s webpage.
Each forest has the option to hand stamp the date on the MVUM (as opposed to having the date printed on the map—also mentioned in the MVUM Production Guide). If the forest does not anticipate making any changes to the map in the near future (1st year or
10
two), the RO TM team suggests hand stamping the date on the map (ask Kyung Koh for more information).
C. Motor Vehicle Use Map (hard copy of map) Review
The RO TM team reviews the final MVUM prior to printing and publication. The forest TM lead should contact Kyung Koh at least two weeks in advance to start the RO review. A full RO review is required for the initial printing of the MVUM, but a full review may not be necessary for every subsequent re-printing (see section E below for more information). Please create a folder (“MapYear_20xx”) in the following T-drive directory location to post all MVUM related files, i.e., .mxd, .gdb, .eps, and .pdf files:
T:\ FS\NFS\Forest name\Program\7700TravelMgmt\GIS\ MVUM_Published
Please use the following naming convention: yearmmdd_unit.pdf Example 1: 20090415_prescott.pdf 20090415_prescott.mxd 20090415_prescott.gdb
Example 2: 20090415_lincoln_guadalupe.pdf 20090415_lincoln_guadalupe.pdf 20090415_lincoln_guadalupe.gdb
A copy of the MVUM ArcMap file (.mxd) and geodatabase (.gdb) used to develop the MVUM are necessary for a thorough review and must be submitted.
Kyung Koh will schedule a follow up meeting/conference call with the Forest to discuss the RO TM team’s edits within two weeks of receiving the MVUM from the Forest (if needed, depends on extent of suggested edits).
Each forest is responsible for incorporating revisions, edits and changes to the Infra and GIS database identified during the review process. Forests will create a final MVUM and a 300 dpi geo-pdf reflecting the edits. Depending on the extent and type of edits, a follow-up review may be requested by either the forest or the RO review team. If no additional review is needed, the MVUM is ready for printing and publication.
D. Printing and Publication of the MVUM
For initial MVUMs: After all edits have been made, the Forest Supervisor sends a letter or e-mail message to the Director of Engineering (please cc Kyung Koh, so she is aware that this step has been completed—she will facilitate the printing process), confirming edits have been made and requesting the MVUM be printed. Please submit the following documents (required for printing) at this time:
1. Completed FS-1600-6 publication proposal (electronic file)
11
2. Electronic files of approved MVUM (.eps, .pdf, geo-pdf, .mxd, and .gdb) posted on the T-drive directory location (see part C above) 3. Folding dummy (may use the previous MVUM if the fold is the same) 4. Forest contact 5. Shipping address
When the publication proposal has been processed and the MVUM sent to the printer, Pat Johnson will notify the forest contact and Kyung Koh of the anticipated delivery date of the final product (normally within five weeks of receipt of the final MVUM and FS-1600-6). Once the MVUM is delivered, the forest is responsible for posting it on its webpage and notifying Kyung Koh this has been completed. Questions regarding the printing process should be directed to Pat Johnson.
Forests are responsible for determining quantities of the MVUM to be printed and should track distribution of the paper copies. It is recommended that each forest retain at least a two month reserve of MVUMs (based on past usage). Once the reserve is opened and depending on the expiration date of the MVUM, Forests should send a new FS-1600-6 and printing files posted on the T-drive directory location to Pat Johnson and Kyung Koh for additional copies. Please allow up to five weeks for reprints.
E. Updates and corrections to the MVUM
The designations shown on the MVUM are effective as of the date stamped or printed on the front cover and will remain in effect until superseded by the next year’s motor vehicle use map. New MVUMs must be available each year.
MVUM reprints: The RO team will review all MVUMs (both initial and reprints) prior to sending to the printing specialist. It is only the length of review time and the complexity of the review that will vary. Forests must submit MVUM change logs when ready for review. That will help the RO team determine the length and complexity of the review. Depending on the extent of changes, the review period may be anywhere from 1 hour to 2 weeks. Please contact Kyung Koh and Ernie Seiger when the Forest is ready for review.
Also located on the O-drive: O:\NFS\R03\Program\2300Recreation\2350_OffRoadVehicleUse\2350-5_Off-Road Vehicle Use Management\R3\RO Oversight Review Process\MVUM\MVUM prep and review process
12
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Appendix B Service Off-Highway Vehicle Updated April 2012 Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Cover photo: Motorcyclists, Gifford Pinchot National Forest
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA‘s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY). To file acomplaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326 -W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TTY). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.
CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Introduction and Understanding the Travel Management Decision ...... 1
A. Introduction ...... 1
B. Understanding the Decision ...... 2
Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed ...... 5
A. Education ...... 5 Purpose ...... 5 Desired Outcome ...... 5 Key Tasks ...... 5 Resources ...... 11
B. Engineering: Managing Designated Roads, Trails and Areas (Including Corridors for Dispersed Camping and Big Game Retrieval) ...... 13 Purpose ...... 13 Desired Outcomes...... 13 Key Tasks ...... 13 Resources ...... 26
C. Enforcement ...... 28 Purpose ...... 28 Desired Outcome ...... 28 Key Tasks ...... 28 Resources ...... 37
D. Evaluation ...... 38 Purpose ...... 38 Desired Outcomes...... 38 Key Tasks ...... 39 Resources ...... 42
Chapter 3. Implementation Strategies (Funding, Partnerships and Volunteers) ...... 43
Introduction...... 43
Chapter 4. Developing an Implementation Plan ...... 49
Steering Committee ...... 49 Implementation Leader ...... 49 Integration of Resource Programs ...... 49 Incorporating Tasks from Chapter 2 ...... 50
Suggested Elements to Include in an Implementat ion Plan ...... 50
Chapter 5. List of Preparers ...... 51
Sign Guide Appendix. Signing for the Travel Management Rule ...... 53
i
Trail Dozer at Work
Trail Marker, Lewis and Clark National Forest
Motorcyclists, Fishlake National Forest
ii
CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION AND UNDERSTANDING THE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT DECISION
A. INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this guide is to assist Forest Service employees responsible for implementing route and area designations (made under the travel management rule at 36 CFR 212, Subpart B) and managing off- highway vehicle use at the field level. This guide identifies key tasks which, if accomplished, will help units successfully implement designations. Many of these tasks should be accomplished prior to producing the motor vehicle use map (MVUM). The guide is also intended to provide ideas for finding resources to accomplish the work and for organizing and prioritizing tasks.
This guide does not provide management direction. Field units may adopt their own approaches or use any elements they find useful, as long as the actions taken are consistent with law, regulation and policy.
Successful implementation will be demonstrated by the protection of National Forest and Grassland resources, promotion of public safety and minimization of conflicts among the various uses of the National Forests and Grasslands while providing for quality motorized recreation opportunities in appropriate locations. It is important to always keep these goals in mind when designing an implementation plan.
Successful implementation will require the following:
A long-term commitment and support from forest leadership, in cluding adequate funding and staffing. To facilitate this, a steering committee could be formed, including line officers, key staff and law enforcement. The role of the steering committee would be to provide resources and direction to the implementation te am.
Support from the public. It is important to maintain and improve the relationships with the public that were built during the planning process. Volunteers and partners may be willing to help in many ways including route maintenance, route construction and rehabilitation, monitoring, support for resource protection objectives, compliance with the MVUM and education of other forest visitors.
Support from other agencies and partners. Many other Federal, State and local agencies have a stake in the outcome and may have funding opportunities.
An integrated effort among the many programs that have a stake in the outcome. To be successful, implementation cannot be the responsibility of just one program area. An interdisciplinary team approach is suggested.
A willingness to continually evaluate our efforts and constantly strive to improve.
1 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Following is the structure for this guide:
Chapter 1 - Introduction and Understanding the Decision – This section includes the purpose of the guide, provides insights about what is needed for successful implementation and highlights the importance of understanding the decision. Employees involved in implementation may be different from those involved in travel planning. It is especially important for those who were not involved in the planning side to understand the decision and its rationale. It is also important to understand the changes from the historic situation.
Chapter 2 - Identifying the Tasks to be Completed – This section identifies the tasks to be completed for successful implementation. These tasks are organized by the four Es which include Education, Engineering, Enforcement and Evaluation.
Chapter 3 - Identifying the Resources to get your job done – This section provides advice about how to obtain the resources needed to complete implementation tasks, with a focus on utilizing volunteers and partners.
Chapter 4 - Developing an Implementation Plan – This section provides guidance on how to organize key tasks to help ensure their completion. This section also provides suggestions for building an implementation plan including a checklist of items to consider for inclusion.
Sign Guide Appendix – This is an appendix to Chapter 2, Engineering Section.
B. UNDERSTANDING THE DECISION
Understanding the decision is important, particularly if you are responsible for implementation, but were not involved in the planning process.
This section helps to achieve this understanding by offering a series of questions designed to help to identify the topics that will be important to implementing your specific decision.
What were the significant issues in the environmental analysis and decision making? These issues help you know who is interested and potentially what they need to be informed and educated about during implementation. They may also give you clues about how difficult it may be to implement, enforce and administer.
Who was actively engaged in the collaboration and decision making process? Knowing who participated and who was active in the environmental analysis and decision making process can help you know who your audiences are for the implementation process. Knowing who is interested in the various aspects of the decision also provides information on who may be willing to be volunteers or partners in implementation. How does your decision change current management? Changes in management resulting from your decision are critically important and should be a focus in the implementation plan. Understanding these changes can help focus education efforts, identify needed signing, inform the enforcement strategy and affect the content of monitoring and evaluation plans.
2 Chapter 1. Introduction and Understanding the Travel Management Decision
Other questions to ask include:
Were any roads converted to motorized trails?
Was a motorized mixed use analysis done and specific decisions made relative to the type s of users on particular routes?
Were safety issues identified with recommended mitigation? Where any roads or trails identified to be decommissioned? What changes in recreational opportunities do the designations make? Which roads have been designated and how many miles? Have any areas been designated? Acreage? Are loop trails provided? Is motorized big game retrieval permitted?
How is dispersed camping being accommodated?
What law enforcement issues, if any, were considered or addressed during the plannin g process?
What changes were made to allowed motor vehicles or season of use?
How is vehicle width handled in the decision relative to current management?
Were any decisions made that resulted in specific restrictions on unconventional modes of travel or vehicle classes, such as restrictions to tracked vehicles?
Is there a transition strategy in place that provides for minimal public use disruption? (For instance, in a case where the decision was to close a set of trails and substitute that opportunity in another area, it may be important and less disruptive to leave the existing system open until the new system is ready to be put into service).
Were any specific commitments made to consider adding motor vehicle route opportunities in the future?
Once you determine what changes may occur as a result of your travel planning decisions, you are ready to move into the subsequent section in identifying specific tasks.
3 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
ATV Rider, Fishlake National Forest
4
CHAPTER 2. IDENTIFYING THE TASKS TO BE COMPLETED
A. EDUCATION
Purpose
The purpose of this section is to outline recommendations and key tasks needed for effective communication with external and internal audiences regarding motor vehicle use and management on National Forest System lands.
Desired Outcome
The desired outcome of implementing the recommendations and key tasks is:
1. Increased understanding and acceptance of travel management decisions,
2. Widespread adoption of safe and responsible motor vehicle operation practices and
3. Promotion of citizen stewardship.
Benefits of these outcomes include increased compliance with route and area designations, decreased vandalism, fewer inadvertent violations, enhanced protection of natural and cultural resources, improved etiquette among visitors, and enhanced safe and responsible motor vehicle recreation experiences for all.
Key Tasks
1. Develop an Education Plan
1.1. Background 1.2. Goals and Objectives 1.3 Audiences 1.4. Message 1.5. Delivery Methods 1.6. Delivery Strategy 1.7. Evaluation
2. Create Supplemental Products to the MVUM As Needed
3. Integrate Education with Engineering, Enforcement and Evaluation
The following sections describe each of these tasks in more detail.
1. Develop an Education Plan
Developing an education plan should be a collaborative effort. Collaboration between forest staff, key stakeholders and forest visitors will help identify target audiences, key messages and effective methods of message delivery. Education efforts should be closely coordinated with public affairs staff.
In general, an education plan should include the following elements:
5 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
1.1. Background
Explain the need for the plan, issues needing to be addressed and changes in on the ground management as a result of implementing travel management decisions.
1.2. Goals and Objectives
Identify the purpose of the education plan and what the unit hopes to achieve through clearly stated goals and measurable objectives. The goals and objectives should focus on improving understanding and acceptance of travel management decisions and enhancing safe and responsible motor vehicle recreation.
1.3. Audiences
Identify the internal and external target audience. Some visitors and employees may not be fully aware of travel management decisions regardless of the amount of outreach and public collaboration that a forest conducted previously. In addition, forest visitors may not be aware of the changes to allowed motor vehicle use until they arrive on the forest. An individual‘s level of awareness and acceptance may be influenced by how engaged that person was in the travel management planning process, perceptions of change represented by the decisions, the desired recreation opportunities, familiarity with the forest, number of visits per year and how well the motor vehicle use map (MVUM) is understood. As decisions are implemented, the target audiences may need to be modified.
All Forest Service employees should be informed, knowledgeable and aware of the travel management decisions and how they impact their operations and program areas. Internal information sharing and trainings will ensure that all employees receive the same message and in turn communicate a consistent message to external audiences. The potential internal and external target audience may include:
External
Motorized and non-motorized visitors Media State and local law enforcement agencies Forest Service permit holders (forest products, grazing, mining, special uses, etc.) Federal, State and local government officials and representatives Tribes Volunteers and partners Local businesses and business groups Environmental groups
Internal
Visitor Information and Support Services staffs Public Affairs Officers Law Enforcement and Forest Protection Officers All field-going employees (PFT and Seasonal) Tribal Liaison Resource specialists Line officers Litigation and Appeals Staff, and FOIA Coordinators
6 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
1.4. Message
Clearly identify the key points to be communicated. What does your audience need to know about the travel management decision and its implementation? The message must be consistent but may need to be tailored to reach different target audiences. Key stakeholders can help identify effective messages.
Key messages to consider:
It is the responsibility of each visitor to obtain a copy of the MVUM annually.
Designations will differ from unit to unit. It is the responsibility of each visitor to understand the designations and rules and regulations for each area they visit.
Visitors must stay on designated roads and trails and in designated areas on National Forest System lands. Designations may vary by class of vehicle and time of year.
Motor vehicle uses not consistent with the designations shown on the MVUM are prohibited. Motor vehicle use that is specifically authorized under a written authorization issued under Federal law or regulations is exempted from the designations. Written authorizations may be issued for firewood gathering, contracted work, road use, and special uses. Also, limited administrative use by the Forest Service is exempted from designations.
Reminders of any seasonal designations.
Reminders to respect private lands when designated routes pass through them.
Use of proper equipment (e.g. helmets, spark arresters, etc.).
State motor vehicle traffic laws apply to National Forest System lands.
Announcement of the current year MVUM identifies any changes to previous year‘s system.
Motorized recreation is a valid use of Young ATV Riders, Humboldt-Toiyabe National National Forest System lands in the Forest right place and under the right conditions.
Engagement of volunteers and partners will help ensure successful implementation of r oute and area designations.
Additional messages may be identified based on other issues, such as applicable State OHV laws, safety concerns, trail etiquette and trespass concerns.
1.5. Delivery Methods
Identify current methods and approaches that are working. Develop additional tools as needed. The effectiveness of any given method will depend on target audience demographics, the recreational pursuit or opportunity they seek and familiarity with the Forest Service travel management planning process. There are two points in time that are critical when communicating with external audiences: (1) before they travel to the forest and (2) after they arrive. There are many advantages to reaching visitors before they arrive:
7 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
They understand that they need to obtain an MVUM.
They understand that operating a motor vehicle on National Forest System lands comes with a responsibility to know the rules and regulations.
They know where they can ride.
They know the type of opportunity available to them and how long to plan t heir trip. For example, if they are looking for an 8-hour adventure, but there are only 2 miles of trails designated for their vehicle type, they will know before arriving that it would probably make sense to go elsewhere.
They know what they need to bring to be prepared.
Recreationists are more likely to comply with designations when user expectations are being met or there is a high likelihood their expectation will be met.
Methods for delivering information to visitors prior to their arrival at a forest include:
Public service announcements. Examples are provided below in the section on resources.
Websites – both agency Web sites and partner groups. Examples are provided below in the section on resources.
Frequently asked question handouts. Examples are provided below in the section on resources.
Brochures and other printed materials. Examples are provided below in the section on resources.
Informational meetings and workshops. Hold Forest Service-sponsored meetings specifically to talk about one or more key messages.
Engage partners and OHV clubs. Attend local club meetings to share key messages. Consider asking State fish and game agencies to publish OHV information in hunting and fishing regulation publications.
Methods for communicating with visitors after they arrive:
Route markers and signs. The MVUM, in conjunction with route markers, should be sufficient to clearly communicate where motor vehicle use is allowed and not allowed. The use of travel management signs may provide additional clarification i n special situations. Signing is covered in more detail in the engineering section and the Sign Guide Appendix.
Kiosks and bulletin boards. Kiosks and bulletin boards provide opportunities to display MVUMs and other related travel management information at all times of the day.
Brochures and other printed materials. Brochures and other printed materials are especially effective if they are readily accessible at gateways such as kiosks, trailheads and displays outside of visitor centers.
Face to face contact. Front desk employees, recreation staff, law enforcement officers, forest protection officers, other field going employees and volunteers can explain the designations, direct recreationists interested in motor vehicle opportunities to areas that will prov ide a quality experience and share stewardship and volunteer opportunities that are available. While this method does not reach as many people as the other tools, it is one of the most effective methods of communication.
8 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
1.6. Delivery Strategy
This includes a schedule and a budget. Identify the tasks, responsibilities and deadlines. Also identify the cost for staff time needed, production of brochures and other printed materials and signing. It is important to acknowledge that education is an ongoing process and messages and delivery methods may need to be revised as travel management decisions are implemented.
1.7. Evaluation
Periodically review the education plan with internal and external audiences to ensure the goals and objectives are being met. Providing opportunities for visitors to stay engaged in the travel management implementation process allows for valuable feedback and insight as to what elements of the education plan are effective and what areas need to be revised or further developed.
1.8. Other Pointers
Things to keep in mind while developing an education plan:
Stay positive. Focusing entirely on ―thou shall not‖ does not promote cooperation with forest visitors. Ensure that contact personnel know what motorized recreation opportunities are available and can make suggestions regarding enjoyable places to ride. When working with the media promote the opportunities and experience as well as the prohibitions.
Volunteers and partners. Use educational efforts to reach out to potential volunteers and partners. Forest visitors and ―peer to peer‖ interactions can play an integral role in educating other visitors about responsible use, informing visitors about available OHV opportunities, and can act as the ―eyes and ears‖ of forest staff by relaying information
about what is happening on the Sound Testing, Los Padres National Forest ground. Volunteers can also assist in maintaining and constructing trails, habitat restoration projects, and installing signs and barriers. They can distribute printed materials such as MVUMs and brochures.
The first two or three years will require the greatest effort. It will take several years for people to understand the designations (including seasonal restrictions) and become aware of how motor vehicle management has changed. It is important to note that travel management, like all visitor management, is a dynamic ongoing process.
Maintain and improve relationships. During the travel management planning process forests worked collaboratively with a variety of groups. It is important to update the groups periodically and keep them informed on progress and next steps. This task can be accomplished through a variety of delivery methods, including newsletters, Web updates, emails, conference calls and traditional media outlets. Continue to visit with key groups and invite everyone to participate in implementing and monitoring travel management decisions.
9 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
2. Create Supplemental Products to the MVUM as Needed
The MVUM is the primary enforcement tool for route and area designations and its primary purpose is to identify the roads, trails and areas where motor vehicle use is allowed. The MVUM was not designed to be used as a navigational tool. Each MVUM must be available, free of charge to the public, both in hard copy form and electronically posted, on each forest Website.
To address the need for navigation friendly tools that can be used in conjunction with the MVUM, the WO is working with the Geospatial Service and Technology Center in Salt Lake City to develop an Interactive Travel Map (ITM). The ITM is national in scope and will display route and area designations for any unit that has published an MVUM. For more information about the ITM, go to: http://pcdeh6zfk91.ds.fs.fed.us:8080/TA_MVUM/. The WO anticipates that the ITM will be available for public use by the end of 2010.
Supplemental products to the MVUM can be developed but keep in mind that the initial MVUM should remain a priority and work on supplemental products should not hinder or take priority over the MVUM. Units should focus on developing supplemental products that enhance visitor understanding and acceptance of motor vehicle designations, increase compliance, decrease violations and that assist the visitor in planning their outing.
These products can provide a wealth of additional information about route and area designations, challenge level, other forest uses, route conditions and terrain and other natural features that may be encountered along a route. Be sure that any information shown on the supplemental products is consistent with the MVUM and that the MVUM I appreciate that I‘m not seeing and hearing him at his most stressed and road and trail numbering) used to develop the MVUM for their supplemental products. Units should work with the Web manager to ensure that the information is accurate and complies with Section 508 of the Rehabilitation Act. Information needs to be accessible and easy to find.
Supplemental products may be in the form of brochures, posters, maps or downloadable data. Developing these products is an excellent opportunity to work with volunteers, partners organized clubs and forest visitors.
3. Integrate Education with Engineering, Enforcement and Evaluation
Education on its own cannot ensure successful implementation of travel management decisions and designations. Education plans should integrate aspects of engineering, enforcement and evaluation efforts where possible.
Educating forest visitors on what types of route markers and signage to look for relates to the engineering efforts on the ground. Educating visitors on how to read and understand the MVUM and the consequences (citations, fines etc.) for non-compliance may result in minimizing intentional and inadvertent violations, reducing enforcement issues. The benefits resulting from effective education will lead to better results identified through evaluation of the designated transportation system and implementation efforts.
10 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
Resources
Sample Plans and Templates
Southern Region OHV Strategic Communication Plan http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/comm/comm -tools.shtml
Forest OHV Communication Plan Template (Southern Region) http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/comm/comm -tools.shtml
Information and Education Toolbox
http://fsweb.r10.fs.fed.us/staffs/rlm/interp_ed/index.shtml
External message examples
Medicine Bow – Routt http://fsweb.mbr.r2.fs.fed.us/travel_management/travel_management.shtml
Public Service Announcement Examples
(Before using any of these, be sure to check with the appropriate organization regarding any restrictions on their use.) http://staythetrail.org/media/index.php http://www.treadlightly.org/page.php/education -psa/PSAs.html#print
Example Websites
Southern Region Ride4Keeps Program http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/ride4keeps/
Louisiana OHV Public Information Proj ect http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/kisatchie/maps/index.html
Utah State Parks OHV Website http://stateparks.utah.gov/ohv
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources OHV Website http://www.dnr.state.mn.us/ohv/index.html
What You Need to Know – Beaverhead-Deerlodge National Forest http://fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5052360.pdf
OHV Trail Riding – Boise National Forest, Recreation
OHV Trail Riding – Allegheny National Forest http://www.fs.fed.us/r9/forests/allegheny/recreation/atv_trails/
Frequently Asked Questions
A list of ―Frequently Asked Questions‖ or ―Facts or Fictions‖ can be a useful tool for both internal and external audiences. FAQs with canned answers: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/comm/comm - tools.shtml Possible FAQs for local answers: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/comm/comm-tools.shtml Fact and Fiction – Apache and Sitgreaves NFs http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/asnf/news/2008/20080331 -travel-management- rule.shtml
FAQ – R3 http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/projects/travel -mgt/faq.shtml
11 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
FAQ – R5 http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/routedesignation/rd -faq.php
Brochure and Printed Material Examples
Coronado NF - OHV Information Sheet: http://www.fs.fed.us/r3/coronado/forest/recreation/ohv/wy_brochure_backcou ntry_touring.pdf
Dixie NF Please Stay on Designated Roads and Trails flyer: http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/dixie/news/2006/dnf_d4_no_xcountry_0418_flyer.pdf Tread Lightly! Responsible OHV Use brochures: http://www.treadlightly.org/ Cibola NF – Sandia RD Safety First Poster: http://fsweb.r3.fs.fed.us/rec/documents/TravelManagementDocs/Implementati on_PostMVUM_Posters/Sandia_TM_safety_poster.pdf
Cibola NF – Sandia RD Respect and Protect Poster: http://fsweb.r3.fs.fed.us/rec/documents/TravelManagementDocs/Implementati on_PostMVUM_Posters/Sandia_TM_post er.pdf
Cibola NF – Sandia RD Grab a Map Poster: http://fsweb.r3.fs.fed.us/rec/documents/TravelManagementDocs/Implementati on_PostMVUM_Posters/MVUM_Display_layout1.pdf
Supplemental Map Products Examples
GSTC Draft Interactive Travel Map http://pcdeh6zfk91.ds.fs.fed.us:8080/TA_MVUM/index.html
Little Belts Travel Atlas http://www.fs.fed.us/r1/lewisclark/maps/littlebelts - travel- atlas14aug2009_redu.pdf
Policy and Regulation
FSM 1600 Public Affairs Programs http://www.fs.fed.us/cgi - bin/Directives/get_dirs/fsm?1600! FSH 1609.11 Publications Handbook http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/directives/fsh/1609.11/ USDA Departmental Regulation RE: Web Services http://www.ocio.usda.gov/directives/doc/DR3430 -001.htm
USDA Web Style Guide http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/pao/internet/documents/style/usda -web- style-guide- v2.0.pdf
Reports and Analyses
A Review and Analysis of Five OHV Communication Programs http://extension.usu.edu/iort/files/uploads/pd fs/OHV_tech.pdf This document provide examples and advice that is helpful for identifying target audiences, involving stakeholders, developing messages and identifying delivery methods.
12 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
Information Board
B. ENGINEERING: MANAGING DESIGNATED ROADS, TRAILS AND AREAS (INCLUDING CORRIDORS FOR DISPERSED CAMPING AND BIG GAME RETRIEVAL)
Purpose
The purpose of this section is to identify work required to manage roads, trails and areas that are designated for motor vehicle use. These projects may include implementing physical changes to the transportation system identified in travel management decisions, completion of sign planning and installation, updating and maintaining the transportation atlas and producing and revising the MVUM on an annual basis.
Desired Outcomes
The desired outcome of this section is to assist forests with successfully implementing travel management decisions, effectively managing the system of designated routes and areas and producing a MVUM and subsequent annual revisions. Successful implementation of travel management decisions and effective management of road and trail systems minimizes impacts to natural and cultural resources, provides enhanced safe and responsible motor vehicle recreation experiences, minimizes conflicts between uses and increases the public understanding and compliance with the system of designated routes and areas.
Key Tasks
There are key engineering tasks and strategies that can be used to successfully implement travel management decisions and to properly manage the system of designated routes and areas. These tasks can include:
1. Develop an Implementation Plan to Identify and Prioritize Needed
Projects and Tasks
1.1 Maintain and Manage Existing Designated Routes
1.1.1 Perform Condition Surveys 1.1.2 Install or Relocate Traffic Barriers 1.1.3 Plan for and Install Needed Signs 1.1.4 Develop and Implement Annual Maintenance Plans
13 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
1.2 Implement Changes to the Route System
1.2.1 Prepare Supplemental Environmental Analysis 1.2.2 Add New System Routes 1.2.3 Convert or Transfer Existing Routes to Other Systems 1.2.4 Decommission Routes 1.2.5 Implement Motorized Mixed Use Mitigation
1.3 Manage Designated Areas and Corridors
1.3.1 Manage Designated Areas 1.3.2 Manage Motor Vehicle Use for Big Game Retrieval and Dispersed Camping
2. Maintain the Transportation Atlas
2.1 Update Infra/I-WEB Information
2.1.1 Record Current Motor Vehicle Designations in the Access and Travel Management Module (ATM) 2.1.2 Develop or Revise Road and Trail Management Objective s
2.2 Update GIS Databases
2.3 Produce and Revise Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM)
3. Integrate Engineering with Enforcement, Education and Evaluation
ATV Rider, Fishlake National Forest
The following sections describe each of these tasks in more detail.
1. Develop an Implementation Plan to Identify and Prioritize Needed
Projects and Tasks
Travel management decisions and NEPA analysis documents should be reviewed in order to develop an implementation plan. The plan should identify any changes, additions, deletions and mitigation needed to manage and implement a system of designated roads, trails, areas and corridors designated for motorized dispersed camping and/or big game retrieval. The implementation plan should identify and prioritize these projects and tasks such as those shown below and include completion strategies, schedules and staff responsibilities. Refer to Chapter 4 – Developing an Implementation Plan.
14 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
1.1. Maintain and Manage Existing Designated Routes
Roads and trails designated for motor vehicle use should be appropriately maintained and managed for the designated use. Field surveys may be needed to determine if the route is currently suitable for the designated use. Gates or other physical barriers may be necessary to prevent unauthorized use. Signs may be needed to assist the public in understanding where they may legally operate motor vehicles. This will aid in tracking and ensuring completion of travel management related projects.
1.1.1. Perform Condition Surveys
Perform route condition surveys as needed to provide up-to-date knowledge of existing road and trail conditions. Condition surveys provide important inputs that can guide the forest as it implements travel management decisions, particularly in identifying reconstruction and maintenance work items needed for the route to safely accommodate the designated motor vehicle use. Surveys are also important in identifying appropriate decommissioning activities. Frequency and intensity of condition surveys will vary with the road maintenance level or Trail Class.
Identified tasks should be included in a decommissioning plan, project reconstruction or improvement plan or an annual road or trail maintenance plan (Refer to Section 1.1.4).
The Infra Travel Routes database is capable of storing all road and trail survey data. Two processes have been developed for roads and trails for conducting field inventory and condition assessment surveys. The Electronic Road Log (ERL) and Trail Condition and Assessment Survey (TRACS) each comply with the Forest Service deferred maintenance protocols by incorporating standardized terminology, data fields and business rules for collecting and recording condition data.
For roads, refer to FSH 7709.59, Chapter 60 and the Deferred Maintenance Website (http://fsweb.r1.fs.fed.us/e/OM/deferred_mtce/DeferredMaintenance.htm) for information on using ERL.
For trails, refer to FSH 2309.18 and the FS RHR Integrated Business Systems Website (http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ibsc/tr-cost.shtml) for the TRACS user guide which provides instructions, examples and forms for completing a survey.
1.1.2. Install or Relocate Traffic Barriers
Appropriate restriction devices such as gates, stiles, barriers or signs should be installed or relocated as necessary to prevent motor vehicles from traveling on undesignated routes. Seasonal designations are usually managed with gates and or signs. Motorized restrictions of a year or more are typically managed with physical barriers such as fences, bollards, earth berms, rocks or vegetation or with specific entrance treatments like disking and ripping the roadbed, while allowing for other non-motorized uses such as walking/hiking.
For considerations in selecting barriers refer to Vehicle Barriers their Use and Planning Considerations (http://fsweb.mtdc.wo.fs.fed.us/php/library_card.php?p_num=0623%201201P). This document provides information on a variety of barrier types including bollards, fences, gates, large rocks and wooden guardrails. This document also includes construction drawings for barriers.
User safety should be a primary consideration in determining the type and location of any barrier. Barriers should be located and installed at locations where a safe turnaround in advance of the barrier either exists or can easily be constructed. Advance warning signs may be needed to advise the traveler of the barrier ahead.
15 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Cables, chains or single-wire barriers shall never be used across any route. Information on appropriate signing of traffic barriers (size of signs, shape, retroreflectivity, placement, color, etc) is found in the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD): http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/ and EM-7100-15 Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/eng/roads_trails/signs_05/index.htm.
1.1.3. Plan for and Install Needed Signs
Ensuring that the public clearly understands the designations shown on MVUMs is critical to successful implementation of the Travel Management Rule.
Agency-wide consistency and uniformity in the use of signs will assist in implementation and enforcement efforts. Lack of sign uniformity and consistency will most likely lead to confusion, undermine public support and make implementation of the travel management rule difficult.
Consistent use of appropriate route markers to identify the designated routes is an important key to helping the public understand the MVUM and know where they can legally take motor vehicles. At a minimum, all designated routes displayed on the MVUM should be clearly marked on the ground with route markers.
The Signing for the Travel Management Rule (Sign Guide Appendix) provides an overview of current Forest Service signing policy and provides specific guidance for signing routes and areas.
Entering Motor Vehicle Restriction Area Sign
1.1.4. Develop and Implement Annual Maintenance Plans
Develop or update annual road and trail maintenance plans, based on the system of designated roads and trails and the results of condition surveys and other information gathered from Road and Trail Managers, maintenance crews and other staff.
The plans will help to identify and prioritize projects and maintenance activities that implement the travel management decisions and will assist in determining the correct installation of gates and other 16 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed traffic barriers, signs and entrance treatments. This plan will help identify funding opportunities and priorities and will identify areas where these activities can be integrated into other forest and district programs and projects.
Maintenance plans should record accomplished tasks such as the installation of gates and other traffic barriers, signs and other maintenance or reconstruction activities.
1.2. Implement Changes to the Route System
Use an Implementation Plan (Chapter 4) to document the changes, additions, deletions and mitigation needed to manage and implement the system of designated roads and trails. Supplemental environmental analysis may be needed to accomplish these changes.
1.2.1. Prepare Supplemental Environmental Analysis
Some projects or implementation activities may require site specific environmental analysis that may have been deferred in the travel management decisions. Examples of possible projects include:
The NEPA document and decision may have recognized the need to decommission system routes and/or rehabilitate unauthorized routes; and to implement habitat restoration on these routes. However the required environmental analysis, biological analysis and heritage surveys were deferred until the project implementation is imminent.
A new trail or a reroute of part of a trail was identified, but the site -specific location and analysis was deferred to a separate project.
The need for additional trailhead facilities or other stagi ng or parking areas designed to accommodate trailers and provide camping opportunities for motorized recreationists was identified, but supplemental analysis is needed to identify the scope and specific design of the facilities.
In cases where there is a proliferation of routes to camping sites within a corridor and cross - country travel is occurring, additional analysis may be required and designation of routes proposed to the dispersed camping sites.
Environmental analysis for these types of projects should be prioritized and can be completed independently of other environmental analyses.
1.2.2. Add New System Routes
Travel management decisions may have determined that additional routes are needed in order to provide a broader spectrum of motorized recreation opportunities for the public. Adding new routes to the National Forest System can be accomplished by a variety of methods including:
1. Constructing a new NFS road or trail,
2. Designating a ML 1 road as a trail (coincident route) ,
One possible method of adding a new trail route could be making the trail coincidental with an operational maintenance level 1 road. When a road is intended for intermittent use by highway-legal vehicles (maintenance level 1) and continuous use by other motor vehicles, the route should be designated as both a National Forest System road and a National Forest System trail (FSH 7709.59, Section 11.1).
17 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
The financial responsibility for maintenance of a route shared by a NFS road and a NFS trail depends on the current use of the route (FSM 7731.11, paragraph 6).
The route is recorded in Infra as both a road and a trail. Consider using the same route number and marker for both the ML 1 road and the trail.
A decision to manage a ML 1 road as a coincident trail should also consider to t he objective maintenance level of the road and whether mixed use would be suitable or not during the time the road is no longer maintained at a ML 1 but is open to highway traffic at a maintenance level 2 through 5. It may be appropriate to undesignated ro utes being used for short periods of logging activities for both safety and financial reasons.
3. Acquiring an existing route from other parties.
Existing routes may be added to the NFS system through different methods of acquisition including land exchange, conveyance, purchase, acquisition, sale and rights-of-ways. When any of these methods are implemented, follow agency guidance related to maintaining jurisdictional records.
1.2.3. Convert or Transfer Existing Routes to Other Systems
Often, a decision has been made to convert or transfer an existing route from one system to another system. No construction is needed as the route exists on the ground. Reconstruction or realignment may be needed to accommodate the designated vehicle type. When this occurs, the route is removed from the original system and is added to the other system.
Convert a Road to a Trail
When existing roads are no longer needed for highway vehicle travel, they may be considered for conversion to trails (See FSM 7703.27 for factors to consider). Key considerations include whether the route would provide a recreation experience consistent with desired trail management objectives, long- term maintenance needs and available funding. Also see FSM 2353.28j for a description of the types of recreation opportunities typically provided on a trail versus a road. When conversion decisions are made, the road is removed from the road system and added to the trail system. In some situations, additional work on the ground may be needed to provide a high quality trail recreation experience.
To help identify the work needed to convert roads to trails, consider the following:
1. Carefully review and/or revise trail-specific design parameters to accommodate the managed use(s) and the designed use for the trail. Adjustments may be needed in the design tread width and grade, clearing limits, turning radii and other factors. For example, a trail prescription may identify narrowing of the tread width and clearing limit to meet the intended design parameters and provide the desired trail experience. These types of adjustments may occur naturally over time or designed and implemented through on -site field work. Design parameters for motorcycle, ATV and four-wheel-drive may be found in FSH 2309.18, 23.
2. Consider minor or major re-alignment of trail segments as needed to provide the desired trail experience.
3. Review and assess both existing and needed route structures including drainage and crossing structures. This assessment may consider opportunities to modify ex isting structures or to construct new structures that are more appropriate for trail vehicles.
18 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
4. Review and assess the existing signs and make appropriate adjustments before the route is managed as a trail.
Convert an Unauthorized Route to a System Route
An existing road or trail that is not a forest road or trail or a temporary road or trail and that is not included in the transportation atlas is an unauthorized route (FSM 2353.05, FSM 7705).
When an unauthorized road is needed to provide long-term access, it can be considered for addition to the road or trail system. An unauthorized road or trail can be converted to a system road or trail only when supported by the appropriate environmental analysis. For roads, see Scenario #1 in the Travel Routes Data Dictionary for guidance on editing I-Web data for unauthorized roads. Reconstruction of the existing route may be necessary to accommodate the designated use.
Transfer a System Route to another Party
Existing routes may be removed from the NFS system through different methods of transfer including land exchange, conveyance, purchase, acquisition, sale and rights-of- ways. When any of these methods are implemented, follow agency guidance related to maintaining jurisdictional records.
Maintain jurisdictional records in the Landownership Records (FSM 5490) and in the transportation system inventory (FSH 7709.55). Record any authorization data in Infra Authorizations Module.
1.2.4. Decommission Routes
Decommissioning roads involves restoring roads to a more natural state. Activities used to decommission a road include, but are not limited to, the following: reestablishing former drainage patterns, stabilizing slopes, restoring vegetation, blocking the entrance to the road, installing water bars, removing culverts, reestablishing drainage-ways, removing unstable fills, pulling back road shoulders, scattering slash on the roadbed, completely eliminating the roadbed by restoring natural contours and slopes, or other methods designed to meet the specific conditions associated with the unneeded road (36 CFR 212.5(b)(5).
When prioritizing route decommissioning projects, the highest priority should be placed on routes with the greatest potential for negative impact on natural resources. Priority should also be placed on projects that will result in improved compliance with the MVUM by eliminating access to other unneeded or unauthorized routes. The method of route decommissioning may have been determined in the travel management decision. If not, subsequent analysis will be needed.
Decommission a route by reestablishing vegetation and, if necessary, initiating restoration of ecological processes interrupted or adversely impacted by the unneeded route. Decommissioning includes applying various treatments, including one or more of the following:
1. Reestablishing former drainage patterns, stabilizing slopes and restoring vegetation ,
2. Blocking the entrance to a road or installing water bars ,
3. Removing culverts, reestablishing drainages, removing unstable fills, pulling back r oad shoulders and scattering slash on the roadbed,
4. Completely eliminating the roadbed by restoring natural contours and slopes (recontouring), and
5. Other methods designed to meet the specific conditions associated with the unneeded road. 19 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
For more guidance on decommissioning routes refer to FSM7734. Refer to the Travel Routes Data Dictionary posted at http://fsweb.r6.fs.fed.us/eng/travel_routes/user_board/, Scenario #2 for guidance on modifying Infra Linear Events to reflect the road decommissioning.
1.2.5. Implement Motorized Mixed Use Mitigation
Motorized mixed use can occur in one of two ways:
A NFS road is designated for use by both highway-legal and non-highway- legal motor vehicles. The road is recorded only in the roads database.
A road and trail are coincident and the use occurs simultaneously. There must be a record in both the road and the trail database.
Decisions to manage mixed use must be based on application of engineering judgment, an engineering study or if appropriate, supported by state law.
Implement mitigation methods identified in the engineering analysis such as signs, speed controls, user education, modifications to road geometry, regulating the timing of either the commercial hauling or recreation use and other safety measures. Refer to FSM 7715.77 and FSH 7709.55, Section 32.21.
During periods of use by commercial highway-legal vehicle traffic, the financial responsibility for traffic generated maintenance is generally borne by commercial users. When the route is only open to non- highway legal vehicles as a NFS trail, maintenance needs resulting from user traffic is the responsibility of the Forest Service Trails Program. Responsibility for custodial non-traffic generated maintenance should be determined and coordinated at the local level (FSM 7731.11, paragraph 6).
1.3. Manage Designated Areas and Corridors
Specific areas and dispersed camping and big game retrieval corridors may be designated for motor vehicle use including designations for types of vehicles and if appropriate, time of year. It is beneficial to establish objectives and benchmarks for managing these areas and corridors.
1.3.1. Manage Designated Areas
Direction on designated area management is provided in FSM 7715.73, Area Designations.
Travel management decisions should provide the description of the geographical boundaries of the designated areas. Accurate area descriptions must be included on the MVUM using easily identifiable geographical features. Signing may be used to supplement the identification of area boundaries; however, signing alone is generally insufficient.
Management objectives need to be developed for the designated area and should include Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) objectives as defined in the Forest Land and Resource Management Plan, requirements for wildlife protection, soil and water protection, noise abatement and other applicable objectives. The ROS objectives should include the expected recreational experience, setting and managerial constraints. The management objectives should also include strategies for managing cross- country use.
1.3.2. Manage Motor Vehicle Use for Big Game Retrieval and Dispersed Camping
Designation of NFS roads and trails may include the limited use of motor vehicles within a specified distance off those routes and other public roads and trails that crosses National Forest System lands solely for the purposes of dispersed camping or big game retrieval. Direction on designated dispersed
20 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed camping and big game retrieval corridor management is provided in FSM 7715.74 Motor Vehicle Use for Big Game Retrieval and Dispersed Camping.
Signs at the beginning and ending of designated corridors may be used to supplement the identification of corridors on the MVUM. Signs may also be used to help establish the distances allowed off the designated route; however, signing alone may be insufficient. Physical barriers and other deterrent methods may also be needed. Accurate corridor descriptions, distances and allowed uses within corridors must be included on the MVUM.
Coordinate with state fish and game departments as needed.
2. Maintain the Transportation Atlas
FSM 7711 requires each administrative unit of the NFS to develop and maintain current records on forest roads, trails and airfields in a Travel Management Atlas. The atlas shall be available to the public at the headquarters of that administrative unit (36 CFR212.2(a)).
The atlas reflects the current inventory and management of a route, not the desired future management. It consists of:
1. Inventories of all existing NFS road, trails and airfields,
2. Inventories of forest roads important to the management of the unit, including other Federal, State, local and private roads,
3. Road and trail management objectives for NFS routes,
4. Identification of needed and unneeded NFS roads,
5. Travel management decisions,
6. Changes in road management status including decommissioning a road, converting a road to other uses, adding a new road to the forest transportatio n system or transfer of jurisdiction over a forest transportation facility,
7. Road management priorities,
8. Geographic information system (GIS) layers and
9. Maps, including the MVUM.
2.1. Update Infra and I-Web Information
An important component of access and travel management is maintaining the transportation atlas. Current and accurate data in the transportation atlas allows forests to record and track travel management decisions and monitor how the existing road and trail systems are managed and maintained. The transportation atlas should be kept current so that the most accurate information is used to make necessary adjustments to management and maintenance strategies. The process of maintaining data is an ongoing and dynamic process.
Determine jurisdiction (FSM 7703.3) on all designated existing transportation system facilities as appropriate. Maintain jurisdictional records in the landownership records (FSM 5490) and in the transportation system inventory (FSH 7709.55). Record any authorization data such as easements and permits in the Infra Authorizations Module.
21 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
The I-Web Travel Routes database shall be used to store all road and trail data. There are several modules that are used to record specific types of data shown in the table below. Information in these modules should be updated as needed.
Modules Used to Record Specific Types of Data
Module Data Documentation Linear Events Linear attributes that occur along a road Roads Travel Routes Data or trail and have an associated length Dictionary such as surface type and jurisdiction. Trails Data Dictionary Record of Date related events such as construction, Events surveys, designations and decisions. Route Features or structures that occur at a Features point or points along a road or trail such as signs, gates, cattle guards and guardrails. Access and Travel management along the length of ATM Data Dictionary Travel the road or trail or for a travel Management management area. Work Items Maintenance and CIP needs along a Infra On-Line-Help road or trail. RMO - Road The management objectives of the road. RMO Data Dictionary Management Objectives TMO - Trail The management objectives of the trail. Trails Fundamentals and TMO Management Training Reference Package Objectives Authorizations Existing or needed authorizations on a Authorizations road or trail. Data Dictionary
Road data dictionaries for Travel Routes, ATM, RMO and Authorizations are posted at: http://fsweb.r6.fs.fed.us/eng/travel_routes/user_board/
The Trails Data Dictionary for linear events, features and tasks is posted at: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ibsc/tr-cost.shtml
The Trail Fundamentals and Trail Management Objectives Training Reference Package can be found at: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ibsc/tr-fund.shtml
2.1.1. Record Current Motor Vehicle Designations in ATM
The ATM Module stores the results of forest travel management decisions and management objectives regarding motorized and non-motorized uses of its roads, trails and areas. For the purposes of this section, we will limit information on the ATM module to motor vehicle use only.
ATM data shall be recorded for all motor vehicle designations as the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) is generated directly from the ATM module. An important component of implementation and monitoring is to maintain data in the ATM module, as route and area designations change. ATM data should be reviewed and revised annually, prior to the MVUM updates.
22 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
ATM data can also be used to develop other various maps, products and reports, including interactive access and travel Web pages, winter travel maps, general travel management maps, visitor maps and specific trail maps.
The ATM module must include a record of the:
Modes of Travel – The motor vehicle type that a route or area is designated for such as Highway Vehicles or Standard Terra OHVs.
Travel Management Strategy – An indication of how and to what extent the uses of the road, trail or area are managed. Strategies include encourage and manage, accept, discourage, eliminate and prohibit.
Travel Management Dates (time of year) – ―From and through dates‖ during which specific uses are allowed or restricted.
Applies To – The group that the allowed or restricted use affects, such as public or administrative traffic or both.
Partners and Visitors
2.1.2. Develop or Revise Road and Trail Management Objectives
Road Management Objectives (RMOs) and Trail Management Objectives (TMOs) are required for each National Forest System (NFS) road and trail and document the intended management purpose, design, and operation and maintenance criteria. RMOs and TMOs require written approval by the responsible official and are included in the applicable forest transportation atlas. Refer to FSM 7714, FSH7709.59 Chapter 10, Section 15.2, FSM 2353 and FSH 2309.18 Sections 12 and 14.
Management objectives may have changed on some routes as a result of a travel management decision. Ensure the RMOs and TMOs are developed and updated as needed and are consistent with designation decisions. It is paramount to update the existing system data and create new RMOs and/or TMOs to reflect both management guidance and changes to physical conditions on the ground.
Projects that would be associated with changed or new management objectives include:
Previously unauthorized routes have been added to the system and are now designated f or motor vehicle use.
23 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Trails that were originally designed and constructed for non -motorized uses such as hiking are now designated for motorized use and may need substantial reconstruction or improvement to meet trail standards for the vehicle class designations.
Routes that were originally designed for one vehicle type and may require reconstruction and/or realignment to accommodate a different vehicle class.
NFS roads that are being converted to NFS trails.
NFS trails that are now sharing a route with a NFS road (coincident route).
Road Management Objectives
Road Management Objectives (RMOs) are recorded either as electronic documents in the RMO module or as hard copy documents. The official RMO is the hard copy signed in ink by the approving line officer (7709.59, ch.11.3). Use the process outlined in FSH 7709.59, Chapter 10, for documenting RMOs. Also refer to FSM 7730.3.
Roads constructed on National Forest System lands are required to be designed to standards appropriate for the intended uses, considering safety, cost of transportation and impacts on land and resources (16 USC 1608(c)). RMOs guide how the road is to be located, designed, constructed, operated and maintained to meet the specific resource management objectives for the area accessed by the road. The objectives are also the basis for the road inventory, signing and mapping and the rules and regulations which apply to the use of the road.
All available information needs to be collected to provide the background for developing access management objectives and road management objectives. At a minimum, the RMO should contain a summary of management area direction, needs for coordination of uses, access management objectives and the design, operation and maintenance criteria for the road.
Other types of information may include the management emphasis for the area; the type and extent of resource activities for timber, wildlife, recreation, minerals, soils and water; environmental constraints; designation of dispersed camping corridors and mitigating and protection measures to be employed.
Trail Management Objectives
Trail Management Objectives (TMOs) document the intended purpose and management of a National Forest System trail based on management direction, including access objectives (FSM 2353.05). TMOs are recorded electronically in the Infra Trails module, with signed hard copies retained at the local Forest Service office.
TMOs provide a basis for assessing the condition of the trail and identifying the work needed to meet appropriate standards. This information is especially important for designated NFS trails that were not previously managed for motor vehicle use. Document the applicable managed use(s) and designed use and identify the applicable design parameters to guide trail maintenance or reconstruction needed to accommodate the managed use(s). For national direction, definitions and instructions regarding TMOs refer to FSM 2353, FSH 2309.18 and instructions and reference documents posted under Trail Fundamentals on the FS RHR Integrated Business Systems Website (http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ibsc/tr-cost.shtml).
2.2. Update GIS Databases Spatial data must also constantly be maintained. Linkages between GIS and I-Web should be reviewed on a regular basis. Update the geographical information system (GIS) by utilizing aerial photo
24 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed interpretation, Global Positioning System (GPS) surveys, other digital map data and on-the-ground verification. As implementation occurs in the field, the changes in information should be entered into GIS as soon as possible. Maintaining this information is key to providing an accurate and reliable MVUM on an annual basis and other map products.
2.3. Produce and Maintain Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM)
MVUMs are mandatory for all FS units and shall display all motor vehicle designations. The MVUM is a combination of ATM Infra data and GIS spatial data and cartographic efforts.
Once the initial MVUMs have been published, they must be reviewed, revised as necessary to reflect changes since the previous MVUM and reissued on an annual basis (FSM 7711.3). Edits made to the transportation atlas (tabular and spatial data) as projects are implemented, barriers are installed, routes are decommissioned and other transportation data is updated are critical to producing accurate MVUM revisions.
Refer to the Motor Vehicle Use Map Production Guide for instructions on producing and maintaining MVUMs. The guide may be found at: http://fsweb.mvum.fs.fed.us/step-3.php.
Refer to the Education Chapter for guidance on developing products supplemental to the MVUM.
3. Integrate Engineering with Enforcement, Education and Evaluation
Engineering efforts need to be integrated closely with education and enforcement efforts to successfully implement travel management decisions. Evaluation is critical for identifying concerns and improving the system over time.
Consider educational opportunities for sharing implementation objectives, timelines, milestones and accomplishments with the public, especially those individuals and groups who participated in the collaboration process. These opportunities may include posting information on the forest Web site, periodic newsletters and press releases to share major accomplishments. This effort could make the public feel comfortable with contributing information during the planning period and would assist the Forest Service in maintaining relationships with the public.
Review draft copies of brochures and other travel management informational products. Check for consistency between on the ground conditions and the information being disseminated to the public.
Sign plans should support the travel management education program. Route markers are important for MVUM compliance so the users can orient themselves on the ground. Trailheads and other staging areas are key locations for connecting with motorized recreationists. Carefully sited bulletin boards can provide a location for posting information and distributing MVUMs and other OHV related materials.
Enforcement personnel are instrumental in identifying problems that can be corrected through engineering or recreation management. The Law Enforcement and Investigations Management Attainment Reporting System (LEIMARS) database can be used to visually display areas with frequent violations, crashes, and investigation reports. Consider mitigation to reduce or eliminate violations and crashes including additional signage or installation of traffic barriers. (See the enforcement section for more information and links to the LEIMAR database.) Any employee or volunteer with field assignments should have an understanding of the designated system, should be able to interpret the MVUM, provide information on opportunities for motorized and non-motorized recreation and contact information for the public to obtain additional information if
25 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
needed. Encourage field-going personnel to carry copies of the MVUM for distribution if requested while out in the field. Provide a process for reporting problems, concerns and questions related to travel management and road and trail conditions.
Condition surveys are an important component of evaluation and monitoring. Tracking changes over time will inform future maintenance plans and help in the identification of changes needed to the motorized route system.
Resources
Trail Maintenance Guidance
Forest Service national design parameters for motorized designed uses may be found at FSH 2309.18, Section 23.2. Use these to identify trail-specific design parameters to accommodate the identified managed use(s) and the identified designed use, incorporating any needed adjustments based on consideration of trail topography, managed use(s) or other applicable considerations (Per FSH 2309.18, Section 14.4 and 14.5).
Additional Forest Service Trails Management and Maintenance Information may be found at: FS 2309.18 Trails Management Handbook Forest Service Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Trails (EM-7720- 103)
Forest Service Health and Safety Code Handbook (FSH 6709.11) Trail Bridges and Structures (FSM 7722 and FSM 7736) FS RHR Integrated Business Systems Trail Data Management: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ibsc/tr-cost.shtml.
This link provides planning, inventory and management concepts applicable to all National Forest System Trails, including the identification of Trail Management Objectives, TRACS and annual reporting requirements and results.
FS National Engineering Website:
http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/eng/roads_trails/drawspec.htm
This Website provides links to drawings and specifications for trails and trail features such as trailheads, bridges, signs and kiosks.
FS Technology and Development Centers Publications Search: http://fsweb.sdtdc.wo.fs.fed.us/pubs/search_all.shtml
San Dimas and Missoula Technology and Development Centers have developed print publications, videos and CDs related to constructing and managing OHV trails. Most of these publications are available for download and videos can be req uested from the Technology Centers.
Recommended Technology and Development Center publications: The Trail Construction and Maintenance Notebook OHV Design Handbook (still under development)
26 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
Groenier, James Scott. 2008. Geosynthetics for Trails in Wet Areas : 2008 Edition
Meyer, Kevin G. 2002. Managing Degraded Off -Highway Vehicle Trails in Wet, Unstable and Sensitive Environments
Vachowski, Brian. 1998. Cattle guards for off -highway vehicle trails. Tech. Rep. 9823-2826- MTDC
Vachowski, Brian; Maier, Neal. 1998. Off-highway vehicle trail and road grading equipment. Tech. Rep. 9823-2837-MTDC
MTDC Staff. 1994. Trails in Wet Areas Turnpike and Puncheon Construction
Video: Construction Trail Switchbacks. Request from FHWA at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/rectrails/publications.htm
Videos: Surface Water Control Techniques for Trail Maintenance, Trails in Wet Areas — Turnpike and Puncheon Construction, Basic Trail Maintenance, Handtoo ls for Trail Work— Part 1 and Part 2 and An Ax to Grind
Examples of Forest Service OHV Trail Systems:
East Fork Rock riding area Deschutes National Forest: http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/recreation/cohvops/efrindex.shtml
Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area: http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/siuslaw/recreation/ohv/index.shtml
Ocala National Forest: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/florida/ocala/recreation/ohv.overview
Fishlake National Forest Rubicon OHV Trail: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/eldorado/recreation/trails - moto/rubicon/ Cleveland National Forest: http://www.fs.fed.us/r5/cleveland/recreation/ohv/index.shtml
Sign Resources
Refer to Sign Guide Appendix
Other Resources
State of Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2007. ―Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines.‖ Trails and Waterways Division, St. Paul, MN
Wernex, Joe. 1994. Off-Highway Motorcycle and ATV Trails Guidelines for Design, Construction, Maintenance and User Satisfaction. Pickerington, Ohio. American Motorcyclist Association.
Crimmins, Tom. Management Guidelines for OHV Recreation. National Off - Highway Vehicle Conservation Council. http://www.nohvcc.org/newsletter/prbook.asp
NOHVCC OHV Library: http://nohvcclibrary.forestry.uga.edu/mgtsub.html
The following FS Website provides links to drawings and specifications for trails and trail features such as trailheads, bridges, signs and kiosks.
FS Technology and Development Centers (San Dimas and Missoula) Publications Search: http://fsweb.sdtdc.wo.fs.fed.us/pubs/search_all.shtml
27 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
C. ENFORCEMENT
Purpose
The purpose of this section is not to establish enforcement policy for travel management but rather to provide a framework to address non-compliance with motor vehicle designations shown on the motor vehicle use map (MVUM) through properly trained, equipped and educated employees and others to document non-compliance. While enforcement is not the only option, it is a necessary component of a comprehensive compliance strategy including education, engineering and evaluation.
Desired Outcome
The desired outcome of enforcement is compliance with the designations shown on the MVUM. The number and location of documented enforcement actions related to travel management would signify whether compliance is being achieved. The benefits of compliance include protection of resources, public and employee safety and decreased costs.
Key Tasks
This section identifies six key enforcement associated tasks to assist with gaining compliance with the route and area designations shown on a MVUM. Depending on the location of the unit, these may not be the only enforcement related tasks and some may require additional work not specifically addressed in order to be successful. The key tasks are:
1. Request Appropriate Forfeiture of Collateral Amounts
2. Coordinate with Magistrates and Prosecuting Attorneys
3. Develop a Compliance Strategy
3.1. The grace concept 3.2. The enforcement concept
4. Use Employees and Volunteers to Assist with Compliance
5. Coordinate with Key Partner Agencies
6. Integrate Enforcement with Engineering, Education and Evaluation
The following sections describe each of these tasks in more detail.
1. Request Appropriate Forfeiture of Collateral Amounts for Violations
A fine associated with a Forest Service Violation Notice is a forfeiture of collateral which has been set by the United States District Court in the jurisdiction where the violation occurs. Under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the district court judge (or the chief judge) of the United States District in each judicial District usually issues a court order, commonly referred to as a local rule, for a forfeiture of collateral schedule to apply across the Federal court district for which they are responsible. Often this forfeiture of collateral schedule will have various subparts that address the violations of specific Federal agencies. While the Forest Service may be asked to provide input to the forfeiture of collateral schedule that will apply to Forest Service violations, it is ultimately the United States District Court that sets the forfeiture of collateral (fine) that it determines is acceptable. A forfeiture of collateral (fine) is often set at an amount that the court feels to be a balance between being great enough to be a deterrent to such
28 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed violations, but not so great as to require numerous court hearings by those seeking only to have their fines reduced.
Under Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, payment of the pre- established fixed sum forfeiture of collateral represents payment in lieu of a court appearance and also ends the case. The forfeiture of collateral schedule established by one United States District Court does not apply to any other United States District Court. There are 94 United States District Courts. Some States have more than one. In addition, some National Forests may have lands in more than one United States District Court judicial district. Following is a link to the U.S. Courts Website: http://www.uscourts.gov/courtlinks/
Because of the above procedures, it is vitally important that a forfeiture of collateral schedule has been updated for the motor vehicle use prohibitions (violations) at 36 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 261.13 prior to implementation and enforcement of the MVUM. The MVUM prohibitions were inserted in a CFR revision effective November 2005. Rather than add the new MVUM prohibitions to the end of the existing prohibitions in Subpart A, there was significant rewording and renumbering of the prohibitions from sections 261.13 to 261.23. Therefore, use of a forfeiture of collateral schedule from the United States District Court dated prior to November 2005 for affixing forfeitures of collateral to Violation Notices will probably result in a forfeiture of collateral amount that is improper and inconsistent with the intent of the District Court because the forfeiture of collateral schedule amounts established by the court are specific to the prohibition (violation) and the prohibition that was numbered 36 CFR 261.13 prior to November 2005 is significantly different from the prohibition with that same number after November 2005.
It should be noted that although the wording of these new prohibitions became effective in November 2005, the MVUM prohibitions were specifically written so as not to take effect until the publication of a MVUM for the affected unit. In most cases this allowed from one to several years lead time for the United States District Court to revise their forfeiture of collateral schedule. However, the court may be unaware of revisions to the CFR that would affect its forfeiture of collateral schedule unless informed by the Forest Service.
In order to verify that the forfeiture of collateral schedule has been updated, contact local Forest Service Law Enforcement personnel. They should have and be using the most current copy of the court‘s forfeiture of collateral schedule.
If the forfeiture of collateral schedule has not been revised to include the motor vehicle prohibitions, seek assistance from the local Forest Service Law Enforcement and Investigations Patrol Captain to initiate the process. Often this is a formal process involving the office of the United States Attorney and may take from weeks to months to accomplish. Often the entire forfeiture of collateral schedule for violations of an agency‘s prohibitions is revised rather than issuing a separate court order for a particular prohibition.
2. Coordinate with Magistrates and Prosecuting Attorneys
Forest Service Law Enforcement and Investigations personnel have regular contact with the United States Magistrate Judge(s) and prosecuting attorneys from the U.S. Department of Justice that have jurisdiction over the area(s) in which they are assigned. The most common contact is during court proceedings. Most magistrates and prosecutors are open to scheduling meetings to discuss issues as long as specific pending cases are not discussed. If a meeting has not occurred concerning the Travel Management Rule or the MVUM specifically, the local Forest Service law enforcement and 29 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
investigations patrol captain and/or law enforcement officer should seek to set up such a meeting. The format of the meeting can range from an informal get together in the office to a scheduled ―day on the forest.‖
Forest Service participants at the meeting should include not only law enforcement, but other Forest Service staff as well, who should be encouraged to attend and present information, in a briefing format. A rough outline of a meeting might include:
Past approach to travel management
Any existing prohibitions addressing travel management on the unit
A few photos of the type of damage the regulations are designed to prevent
A good clean copy of the travel management changes that relate to the prohibitions from the CFR http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/rules/final_rule.pdf
An example copy of a MVUM (this may be from another unit because if the unit already has a MVUM, this discussion with the magistrate is overdue)
How the Forest Service intends to deal with travel mana gement using the MVUM What supplemental signing has been or will be installed How the Forest Service intends to handle violations in conjunction with the court
Ask for and listen to suggestions from the magistrate
3. Develop a Compliance Strategy
There is no single comprehensive compliance strategy that will work for all units in all locations. Some units that have already implemented their MVUM went forward with a formal step by step process and others took a less structured approach. However, experience indicates that any approach without enforcement will achieve limited success; therefore, it is imperative that Forest Service law enforcement and investigations (LEI) personnel be involved early on in the process because LEOs are more apt to be the agency employees charged with obtaining compliance on a regular and ongoing basis long after others involved in travel management have been directed to other projects.
There are currently at least two variations concerning enforcement of the prohibitions that would be most applicable to travel management: the grace concept and the enforcement concept, both outlined below.
3.1. The Grace Concept
Engage in an education campaign to get the information disseminated concerning the new prohibitions and the effective date. Then begin immediate targeted enforcement of the prohibitions on, or very shortly after, the implementation date. Most violations initially observed will be addressed with a warning notice which will serve to further reinforce the message that there is a new prohibition in place. At some not too distant future pre- determined date, violations will then normally be addressed with Violation Notices. This approach is not meant to preclude Violation Notices being issued before that date based on the circumstances of the contact, but rather to allow users to be informed of upcoming changes to what they may have experienced during prior visits. This concept has the potential to create future enforcement problems since it creates an expectation that violations will not result in a penalty; therefore, the unacceptable behaviors are slower to change. When the date to issue Violation Notices arrives, there is a backlash. Despite this potential problem, this
30 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed approach may be the only alternative to units that do not have an up-to-date forfeiture of collateral schedule at the time of the implementation.
3.2. The Enforcement Concept
Engage in an education campaign to disseminate information concerning the new prohibitions and the effective date. Begin immediate targeted enforcement of the prohibitions on or very shortly after, the implementation date (when the MVUM is available). Most violations observed may be addressed with a violation notice which will serve to further reinforce the message that there are new prohibitions in place and the Forest Service is serious about enforcing them. Failure to address violations with Violation Notices weakens this concept and unacceptable behaviors will take longer to change. The effectiveness of this approach is absolutely dependent on the availability of the MVUM, signing and information. If the public notice is not adequate, this approach should not be attempted.
Whichever approach or some variation thereof, is utilized, documentation of violations is imperative. Documentation may be in the form of incident reports (in the cases where a violator is generally unknown), warning notices (when the identity of the violator is known, but for some other reason circumstances of the violation may not warrant a violation notice) or a violation notice (where a violation occurred and the identity of the violator is known and there are no known circumstances to mitigate or explain why the prohibited action was taken). In all contacts, whether a violation notice is issued or not, all employees, including LEOs, should take the opportunity to explain and educate. There are certain actions that LEI personnel may take to clearly emphasize that enforcement of this prohibition will be a priority:
Utilize high profile patrols and surveillance in identified problem areas.
Work during the identified problem and weekends.
Supplement Forest Service patrols with patrols by cooperating law enforcement agencies.
Patrol with and be seen with cooperating law enforcement agency officers.
Utilize the most effective and efficient means of patrol for the area being patrolled (i.e., all-terrain vehicle, snowmobile, 4 x 4 or aircraft).
Ensure all violations are documented.
Follow through on complaints. Forest Service Employee on patrol
4. Use Employees and Volunteers to Assist with Compliance
LEOs are not the only employees that can be utilized to gain regulatory compliance. All Forest Service employees have a responsibility to observe and report in a timely manner all violations of Federal laws and regulations to law enforcement personnel or line officers. Properly trained forest protection officers (FPOs) perform many of the same compliance duties relating to travel management, including completing incident reports and issuing warning notices or violation notices. FPOs should be receiving technical direction from LEOs when engaging in law enforcement functions. Yearly recertification is required of FPOs. LEOs and FPOs should take time to get to know each other and have well established communication. LEOs should review violation documentation completed by FPOs. 31 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Volunteers are a great resource. They often represent the agency when no agency employee is present. They provide information, assistance and they encourage compliance. However, since they are not employees of the Forest Service they cannot take direct enforcement actions on violations of Forest Service regulations. Volunteers that will be involved in travel management should be fully aware that they are not to undertake enforcement, but rather provide information and education and provide LEOs with information regarding violations. LEOs and volunteers should get to know each other and have well established communication.
In addition to receiving job safety training, FPOs and volunteers should be provided basic personal safety awareness training. All employees and volunteers should have methods to communicate with law enforcement personnel in a timely manner (radio, pager, cell phone, etc.). They should also be fully informed of the travel management decisions on the unit including application, use and navigation of the MVUM. They need to understand the MVUM and be able to relate it to others that may have questions so that a user is provided correct information during the contact.
For violations observed by volunteers as well as employees not authorized to engage in enforcement activities, a small simple card can be produced to record their observations. Typically law enforcement personnel have cards or a similar system for collecting information. The terminology for this type of card would be a field contact card or a field interview card. However for non-law enforcement personnel and volunteers to document and report violations or problems relating to travel management, a simpler card can be produced.
For ease of use and carrying, the card need not be larger than a 3½ inch by 5 inch index card. It should be produced on card stock similar to index cards to provide a firm surface for writing. Information to be recorded on the card would include the minimum required information to produce a record in the Law Enforcement and Investigations Management Attainment Reporting System (LEIMARS) (represented by the shaded entries on the example shown on the next page) as well as any other information that would aid law enforcement personnel in addressing the violation. This may include where, when and for how long the violation was observed, the identity or description of the individual observed and type of vehicle involved. The card could also provide a mechanism for delivering digital photographs of violations. This card would then be given to enforcement personnel.
The following shows the front of a sample card:
32 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
Travel Management Issue Reporting Card (Front) Person who observed issue Date completed Date of issue (if different) Time occurred Place observed What was observed How long observed Vehicle observed Color Make Wheels (circle) Came from Direction of travel 2 3 4 other Operator (if known) Name Address Sex (circle) Race Height Weight Hair color M F Clothing Hat/helmet color Shirt color Pants color Other
Given to Law Enforcement
The back of a sample card might provide space for additional information, preprinted contact information such as the local district office, emergency numbers, law enforcement officer, trails manager and recreation technician.
Travel Management Issue Reporting Card (Back) Additional Information
District Office Law Enforcement Officer Green and Gold Ranger District (800) 555-1212 John X. Sample (800) 555-1213 1234 Front Range Road Anywhere, USA 56789 Trails Manager EMS Sheriff Jill Dozer (800) 555-5555 911 911 Recreation Tech Isaac Deere (800) 555-5555
Enforcement personnel should follow up on each report and inform the reporting party of the action taken. The best situation would be one in which enforcement is rarely required due to the self- compliance of the forest visitor. Often user groups themselves attempt to impose acceptable behavior standards upon those less inclined to follow the rules. There are usually three distinct groups. The largest group is also the group that attempts to abide by the rules. Another, usually significantly smaller group 33 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
will not abide by the rules. The third group usually is made up of people not aware of the rules and regulations but may be following the actions of another group. The role of enforcement is informing the public as well as correcting unacceptable acts. This will also reinforce the self-compliance created by the groups.
Unfortunately, there are sure to be situations that will not appear to fit the travel management program as conveyed by signing, the MVUM, information or education. Exemptions to the prohibition at 36 CFR 261.13 include: (a) Aircraft; (b) Watercraft;
(c) Over-snow vehicles;
(d) Limited administrative use by the Forest Service;
(e) Use of any fire, military, emergency or law enforcement vehicle for emergency purposes; (f) Authorized use of any combat or combat support vehicle for national defense purposes; (g) Law enforcement response to violations of law, including pursuit; (h) Motor vehicle use that is specifically authorized under a written authorization issued under Federal law or regulations; and
(i) Use of a road or trail that is authorized by a legally documented right -of-way held by a State, county or other local public road authority.
The exemptions most likely to occur are those involving administrative use by the Forest Service which will tend to produce feelings of, ―Why can‘t I do that?‖; law enforcement use, ―Why do they get to do that?‖; and written authorizations for motor vehicle use not covered by the travel management rules, ―I saw so-and-so do it.‖
Many of the same exemptions apply to over-snow vehicle use: (a) Limited administrative use by the Forest Service; (b) Use of any fire, military, emergency or law enforcement vehicle for emergency purposes; (c) Authorized use of any combat or combat support vehicle for national defense purposes; (d) Law enforcement response to violations of law, including pursuit; (e) Use by over-snow vehicles that is specifically authorized under a written authorization issued under Federal law or regulations; and
(f) Use of a road or trail that is authorized by a legally documented right -of-way held by a State, county or other local public road authority.
These exemptions have the potential of creating uncomfortable questions by users, but they are valid exemptions under the Travel Management Rule and Forest Service personnel should not hesitate to identify them as such.
34 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
Volunteers, National Forests in Florida
5. Coordinate with Key Partner Agencies
Federal agencies, including the Forest Service, have the right to manage their lands differently than management of non-Federal lands. Travel management is no exception. The Forest Service, State highway patrol, county sheriff, State departments of natural resources and State fish and game departments are also concerned with motor vehicle travel. Depending on the location of the unit, other agencies may be involved.
The Forest Service should meet with other agencies and include LEI, field personnel and management to brief them on the Travel Management Rule, its applicability and who can enforce what and where. Providing MVUMs when available will be very beneficial. In general, non-Forest Service law enforcement personnel cannot enforce travel management prohibitions. Some States or counties may have laws or ordinances that can be enforced and no agency should be discouraged for enforcing what they have a valid right to enforce. ―Ride-alongs‖ and ―show-me‖ days are valid ways to educate other agency personnel.
6. Integrate Enforcement with Engineering, Education and Evaluation
A clear commitment to enforcement depends on properly managing designated routes and areas (engineering), adequate education efforts and evaluation of enforcement efforts. Effective engineering and education efforts will reduce the need for many enforcement patrols. Engineering can prevent or reduce inadvertent violations, resource damage, crime vulnerability and getting lost. The strategic goal is to remove the opportunity to commit a violation, while not adding or taking away from what was previously offered. This can be summarized as: 35 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Logical design of routes.
Installation of barricades, gates and other natural obstacles.
Signing, both directional and informational, to ensure the public stays on designated roads, trails and designated areas.
Physically closing and/or rehabilitating decommissioned or unauthorized roads and trails.
Education should focus on employees as well as specific user groups, school groups, recreation users and the public. The goal is to develop responsible and concerned forest users. In summary:
Ensure that LEOS as well as all employees understand the MVUM and the reasoning behind it.
Routes should be posted with markers and signs (ties to the Engineering element of proper OHV management).
Assure MVUMs are easily available to public.
Distribute additional brochures promoting responsible use with the maps.
Conduct environmental interpretation activities in local communities, at schools and with special interest groups affected by the MVUM.
Use of all forms of the media (television, radio and newspapers), especially prior to implementation and during high use periods.
Utilize high visibility prevention patrols and public information checkpoints, especially during the peak use periods.
Work with United States Attorney‘s Office press officers to prepare news releases of successful prosecutions or arrests, which may include offender names, criminal penalties and court ordered restitution.
Evaluation is another key to successful enforcement. This includes monitoring and identifying changes needed to be more successful in implementing route and area designations. Each violation that is documented on an incident report, warning notice or violation notice is recorded with a latitude and longitude position and entered into the Law Enforcement and Investigations Management Attainment Reporting System (LEIMARS). Creating any other process or system of records to track or monitor travel management should not be considered. LEIMARS has the capability to produce statistical reports that can identify when, where and what violation occurred as well as the type of vehicle. The quality and usefulness of these reports is directly tied to the data gathered on the original documents. At a minimum, a LEIMARS record requires, among other information, latitude and longitude as well as the region, forest, district, State and county where the offense occurred and the offense itself. Using this retrieval information, graphical map representations may be created in ARCGIS of individual violations and/or all violations of specific prohibitions over a given timeframe. Clusters of points on such a map indicate that something in that location is creating an area of high enforcement activity. This may be because there is a trailhead, ineffective signing, undesignated travel ways or other situations.
For this to be an effective input to monitoring, all violations need to be recorded. Even if no violation notice is issued, a warning notice or an incident report can be used to document the situation and thereby be a part of the monitoring process.
Another important aspect of evaluation is providing feedback to line officers regarding issues and successes. Statistical reports from LEIMARS, printed ARCGIS maps or simple conversations with line officers by Forest Service patrol captains or LEOs are some of the methods of providing feedback to line 36 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
officers. Forest Service law enforcement personnel typically submit weekly reports of significant activity in their areas. A copy of this is often routed to line officers. Any travel management issues may be mentioned here.
Digital photos are an inexpensive and effective way to convey visual images of issues as well as successes. These can also be stored for potential use in presentations highlighting the same issues. A periodic meeting to review the MVUM, prior to preparing the next map, is a good way to focus attention on what is working, what is not and potential reasons.
Whatever method is employed, it is important to not wait to provide this input. The longer a potential problem goes unaddressed, the more time, energy and funds it takes to fix it.
No one of the above elements is more or less important than the other. Enforcement, engineering, education and evaluation must be equal parts of a successful compliance strategy.
Resources
Wildlands CPR developed a publication entitled ―Six Strategies for Success Effective Enforcement of Off-Road Vehicle Use on Public Lands‖ which lays out a basic framework of a compliance strategy that evolved from interviews of many Federal land managers including past and present Forest Service employees. This publication is available at: h ttp://www.wildlandscpr.org/six-strategies-effective- enforcement-publication.
In conjunction with the publication of the Travel Management Final Rule, the Forest Service produced an informational document that provides basic information on the rule, the need and implementation: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/ohv/ohv_use.pdf
Recognizing that the management of off-highway vehicle (OHV) use would present a number of challenges, the Forest Service held a National OHV Collaboration Summit, in San Diego, CA on April 11 – 13, 2005. The proceedings of this summit include a number of case studies on units that have already undertaken some manner of travel management. In one study cited on the Daniel Boone National Forest, enforcement began after appropriate signing and information. Word of the enforcement efforts spread quickly and illegal use declined by a reported 90 percent in less than 60 days: http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/ohv/CaseStudyReport.pdf
In September 2004, the Forest Service National Off-Highway Vehicle Implementation Team Management Team produced a report including a number of case studies representing different aspects of implementation: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/route/ohv_case_study_sept2004.doc
In January 2000, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) embarked on a national management strategy for Motorized Off-Highway Vehicle Use on Public Lands. Their plan was published in January 2001. In their strategy, the BLM recognized an increased need for law enforcement personnel to ensure compliance (see numbered page 16 of their strategy). While the BLM strategy also addressed many of the same issues that the Forest Service is facing, some BLM solutions are somewhat different than those of the Forest Service: http://www.blm.gov/ohv/OHV_FNL.pdf
37 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Restoration work
D. EVALUATION
Purpose
The purpose of this section is to provide general guidance on the development and implementation of a monitoring and evaluation program. Effective monitoring provides for the timely and cost effective collection and assessment of relevant data, enabling managers to make needed changes to meet desired objectives.
Desired Outcomes
Implementation of a monitoring and evaluation program will greatly improve the likelihood of successfully implementing travel management decisions and provide for responsive, adaptive management. The desired outcomes include:
Compliance with the travel management rule.
A collaborative approach that incorporates information from multiple disciplines and levels within the agency, as well as input from stakeholders, partners and forest visitors.
A process for making revisions to the designated system based on appropriate environmental analysis and public involvement.
Using evaluation of the monitoring data to adjust management, including planning the engineering program of work, the educational strategy and enforcement.
38 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
Key Tasks
This section identifies four key tasks to assist with the development and implementation of a monitoring and evaluation program. These tasks are:
1. Monitor and Evaluate the Effects of Motor Vehicle Use
2. Annually Review Designations and Revise As Needed
3. Incorporate Evaluation Results with Forest Plan Revisions
4. Integrate Evaluation with Engineering, Education and Enforcement
The following sections describe each of these tasks in more detail.
1. Monitor and Evaluate the Effects of Motor Vehicle Use
Route designations are not permanent. The Travel Management Rule requires units to monitor effects of motor vehicle use on designated roads, trails and in designated areas (36 CFR 212.57) and to revise designations as necessary (36 CFR 212.54). Review FSM 7704.7 and FSM 7717.1 for additional information on monitoring requirements and responsibilities.
Document what effects will be monitored, what protocols will be followed and how often and when the monitoring should occur. Use applicable criteria in 36 CFR 212.55 as a basis for identifying effects to monitor. The NEPA documents associated with the designation decision may identify specific monitoring requirements.
Monitoring programs should emphasize realistic, cost-effective commitments that can be met. Several types of monitoring can be used including project implementation monitoring, effectiveness monitoring, program monitoring and validation monitoring. The following defines each of these monitoring types and provides example monitoring objectives related to travel management:
Project implementation monitoring evaluates compliance with land management plans and project decisions, including any required mitigation measures. Example monitoring objectives may be:
Are implementation actions consistent with the travel management decision, including mitigation?
Has phased implementation occurred, such as adding a road or trail to later editions of the MVUM, once mitigation or construction is completed?
Effectiveness monitoring evaluates the effectiveness of management actions in achieving desired outcomes. An example monitoring objective is:
Are education and enforcement efforts effective in reducing intentional and unintentional violations?
Are mitigation measures achieving their desired results? Are there safety issues such as documented crashes? Program monitoring tracks and evaluates ecological, social and economic trends. Example monitoring objectives are: Are long-term outcomes envisioned in the travel management rule achieved at the local level? What are the effects from motorized use of the designated system on water qua lity?
39 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
What public safety issues have developed through the use of the designated system? Are access needs being met? Is the designated system reducing conflicts among uses?
Validation monitoring verifies assumptions and models used in project implementatio n. Example monitoring objectives may be:
Are assumptions and models used in project analysis still valid?
Are anticipated recreation opportunities and experiences being provided?
Is the designated system sustainable in terms of maintenance and administrati on needs?
The continued involvement of the public, user groups and other partners is a key aspect of successful monitoring. Partners and other stakeholders can assist with monitoring and evaluation. Involving them can help strengthen relationships that developed during the travel planning process. They can assist with gathering and evaluating data, as well as provide valuable insight on proposed changes to the system. Forest visitors can report violations, identify what is working well and also identify problem areas. More information is available in the volunteer and partnership chapter.
One technique for evaluating the effectiveness of travel management implementation and the system of designated routes is maintaining a database of public comments and concerns. This could include both comments made at visitor centers or other public contact centers, comments received via the unit‘s visitor info email inbox, mail or through field personnel.
A process for notifying stakeholders should be identified for sharing findings, proposing changes and highlighting successes. It is also important to share this information with line officers, resource specialists, neighboring forests and districts and the public, particularly when there are proposed or approved changes to the system or when changes have been successfully implemented. Information sharing can be done through newsletters, monitoring reports and updates on the forest Website.
According to the Forest Service Inventory and Monitoring Institute, an effective monitoring program should:
Be targeted to specific objectives and designed to answer specific questions. Focus on the appropriate spatial and temporal scale to answer those questions. Involve collaboration with others (e.g., other agencies, interested publics, researchers and nongovernmental organizations) to share the workload (including obtaining data from other sources), gain expertise and build credibility and trust.
Use the best available science and established protocols to collect and evaluate the data. Use current information management techniques and tools. Contain stringent selection criteria so that monitoring is conducted only if it is feasible, realistic and affordable.
Emphasize evaluation as much as collection of data.
Evaluation is the review of the monitoring data and results in the compilation and distribution of reports detailing: (1) program costs; (2) positive and negative effects of travel management decisions on public safety, natural and cultural resources and visitor satisfaction; (3) annual accomplishments; (4) program of work for upcoming year; and (5) recommendations for changes to the designation or the manner in which the current designation is being implemented and managed. 40 Chapter 2. Identifying the Tasks to be Completed
2. Annually Review Designations and Revise as Needed
Designations identified on the MVUM are subject to revision. An effective monitoring and evaluation program should assess the decisions that have been implemented and identify the need to change them. The importance of monitoring and evaluation and the possibility of future changes should be effectively communicated with the public and cooperating agencies.
The preamble to the Travel Management Rule states that: ―The Department supports the concept of adaptive management and agrees that monitoring and, if needed, revision of motor vehicle designations will be an ongoing part of travel management. Since the system of designated routes and areas will change over time, the Department anticipates that local units will publish new motor vehicle use maps annually and update signs as necessary or appropriate.‖
FSM 7711.3 (6) further requires MVUMs to be reviewed and reissued annually. Reissued maps will reflect any revisions to designations. Publishing on a predictable, well- established schedule will create a transparent process that encourages the public to stay engaged and know when to provide input, enhances expectations and understanding of the rule, the designations and the map and helps avoid situations in which a user innocently relies on an obsolete MVUM.
Some of the changes to the system of roads, trails and areas designated for motor vehicle use may include adding routes to the system, eliminating some routes and changing designations including motor vehicle classes or seasons of use. Revisions to designations are subject to 36 CFR 212.54. In most cases, these changes (including connected actions and cumulative effects) are addressed on a site-specific basis and do not trigger reconsideration of decisions about the whole system of designated routes and areas on a forest or district.
Orders closing a route or area will continue to be issued when motor vehicle use is directly causing or will directly cause, considerable adverse effects pursuant to 36 CFR 212.52(b)(2) and in other emergency situations (e.g., fire closures). Ideally, however, the designated system will be managed so that considerable adverse effects do not occur. Early identification of potential problems and close work with forest visitors will help minimize and mitigate impacts before they become unacceptable.
Occasionally (e.g., when a new species is listed under the Endangered Species Act), there may be a need to fundamentally shift the system of designated routes and areas across a large portion of a forest or district. In these cases, a broad travel analysis leading to proposed changes and further NEPA analysis may be appropriate.
3. Incorporate Evaluation with Forest Plan Revisions
As forests initiate forest plan revisions, there is an opportunity to integrate travel management evaluation into the forest plan monitoring program. The preamble to the rule states that: ―The Department is adding ‗consistent with the applicable land management plan, as appropriate and feasible‘ to § 212.57 of the final rule to clarify that monitoring should be incorporated into land management plans under 36 CFR 219.11 to the extent possible ‗to avoid redundant monitoring requirements.‘‖
4. Integrate Evaluation with Engineering, Education and Enforcement
An effective monitoring and evaluation program affects all aspects of travel management and is intertwined with and informs engineering, education and enforcement activities. Monitoring the effectiveness of engineering, education and enforcement can improve their contributions to travel
41 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
management. Up-front planning is required to ensure that each of these activities is integrated throughout implementation.
For example, monitoring and evaluation can be used to confirm the effectiveness of various engineering activities, such as trail design to prevent erosion or sign placement to improve compliance with the designations. Evaluation can also assist in identifying projects where additional signs or traffic control devices are needed to improve compliance. On the ground review of designated roads and trails will also identify areas where maintenance is needed to reduce impacts to natural and cultural resources. Similarly, evaluation of education efforts can help with identifying tools to increase understanding of the designations and the purpose of travel management, which can in turn increase compliance with the MVUM.
Resources
Sample travel management monitoring plans
http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/monitoring/sample -docs.shtml
PowerPoint on monitoring for travel management was produced by the National Off- Highway Vehicle Conservation Council and is specific to trail monitoring: http://www.nohvcc.org/education/monitoring.pdf
Example monitoring and action forms
Daily Diary and Patrol Log: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/monitoring/sample -docs.shtml
Road and Trail Action Form: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/monitoring/sample - docs.shtml
Sample EMS documents
http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/monitoring/sample-ems-docs.shtml
Monitoring and Evaluation Guides and Handbooks for Volunteers and Partners: http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/mon itoring- evaluation/
Hardened Trail, Mark Twain National Forest 42
CHAPTER 3. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES (FUNDING, PARTNERSHIPS AND VOLUNTEERS)
INTRODUCTION
The MVUM has been printed and released and a long list of implementation tasks have been identified and prioritized. Now, how do forests complete all this work? There are many funding options, as well as opportunities to work with partners and volunteers, to address all aspects of travel management including engineering, education, enforcement and evaluation.
The following sections discuss funding supplemental to appropriations, partners and volunteers, as they relate to travel management.
1. Identify Opportunities for Funding Supplemental to Appropriations
1.1 Grants 1.2 Resources for Grants 1.3 Recreation Enhancement Act
2. Working with Partners
2.1 Agreements 2.2 National Partners 2.3 Regional and Local Partners
3. Working with Volunteers
3.1 Finding Volunteers Interested in Travel Management Projects 3.2 Resources
1. Identify Opportunities for Funding Supplemental to Appropriations
There are a variety of funding opportunities beyond appropriated funds for completing travel management related projects. Key funding opportunities include grants and fees derived through the Recreation Enhancement Act. The first step is to review the list of tasks and identify those that may be suitable for applying for grants or other funding opportunities.
1.1. Grants
Prior to filling out a grant application it is important to review the list of implementation tasks and identify those that may be suitable for grants or other funding opportunities. Next, funding options must be prioritized. Once a decision is made to proceed with a grant application, adequate staff time must be allowed for preparing the grant application package. If the requested funding is granted, additional staff time will be needed for managing the funds, completing required reporting for the granting entity and monitoring work progress. Successful grant writing is often as much an art form as a science. While you will certainly need to adhere to well-defined proposal submission guidelines, you‘re likely to find that your odds for success
43 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
will increase dramatically if you are willing to pick up the phone and begin building relationships with potential funding organizations.
The following section provides resources for grants and grant writing.
1.2. Resources for Grants
Partnership Resource Center http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org
The Partnership Resource Center is a robust source of information for building vibrant partnerships. This Website lists multiple funding opportunities, Forest Service resources for grants and grant management and resources for enhancing skills in grant development and writing. Go to ―Fund my Project‖ from the home page.
Recreational Trails Program http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/rectrails/index.htm
The Recreational Trails Program (RTP) provides funds to States to develop and maintain recreational trails and trail-related facilities for both non-motorized and motorized recreational trail uses.
The RTP is an assistance program of the Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Federal transportation funds benefit recreation including hiking, bicycling, in-line skating, equestrian use, cross-country skiing, snowmobiling, off-road motorcycling, all-terrain vehicle riding, four-wheel driving or using other off-road motorized vehicles. Each State administers its own program. To contact your State RTP Administrator for guidance on State policies and project eligibility requirements, visit: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/rectrails/rtpstate.htm
National Trails Training Partnership www.americantrails.org/resources/funding
This Website provides links to a variety of local, State, Federal and private grant and partnership opportunities.
National Forest Foundation Grant Programs
Non-profit organizations can apply for matching funding twice a year for hands-on stewardship projects with measurable, on-the-ground benefits to National Forests and Grasslands. Go to: http://nationalforests.org/conserve/grantprograms/ontheground/map.
State OHV registration programs
Many States administer grant programs from funds received from OHV registration to develop and maintain trails. The links below provide some of the examples for State grant programs:
Oregon: http://www.oregon.gov/OPRD/ATV/Grants.shtml
Utah: http://stateparks.utah.gov/grants/ohv
Montana: http://fwp.mt.gov/recreation/grants/ohv/default.html
Colorado: http://parks.state.co.us/Trails/Grants/
California: http://ohv.parks.ca.gov/?Page_id=1164
44 Chapter 3. Implementation Strategies
1.3. Recreation Enhancement Act
The Recreation Enhancement Act allows the Secretary of Agriculture to establish, modify, charge and collect recreation fees at Federal recreation lands and waters as provided for in the Act. REA benefits visitors to Federal public lands by reinvesting a majority of revenue back to the site of collection. More information on REA may be found at: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/recfee/.
Following are some OHV related projects which receive funding through REA:
In 2007 the Ocala National Forest implemented a fee for OHV riders to use the new Wandering Wiregrass and Ocala North OHV Trail Systems. Fees are $10.00 for a 1 to 3 day pass per operator; a 7-day pass is $25.00 per operator. These passes are sold at the trailhead entrances. Annual passes are $75.00 per operator and are sold at Visitor Centers and District Offices.
The South Pedlar ATV Trail System on the Glenwood -Pedlar Ranger District of the George Washington/Jefferson National Forests has a fee for a 19-mile ATV trail system. More information on the trail is available at: http://www.fs.fed.us/r8/gwj/gp/recreation/trails/atv_ohv/ index.shtml.
The San Bernardino National Forest supports OHV management through their ―Adventure Pass.‖ For more information go to: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/recfee/docs-rpt-2008/r5-san- bernardino-fy08.pdf
2. Working with Partners
Partners are critical to the successful implementation of travel management decisions in many areas. Partnerships offer an opportunity for both the agency and its partners to achieve their goals and to facilitate grant opportunities. To obtain grants, often a non- Federal match is required, either through monetary contributions or in-kind contributions (for example materials or volunteer labor). Some funding opportunities are only available to non-profit organizations. There are dozens of private and public organizations that Forest Service Training using UTVs are eager to fund efforts related to the design, development, maintenance and monitoring of motorized trails. Don‘t overlook local, State (especially if they have an OHV ―sticker‖ program), Federal and tribal government agencies that you probably work with on a regular basis.
Partners may be interested in including road, trail and area designation maps in their publications or developing more detailed maps displaying the designations and opportunities. Local and State law enforcement agencies may partner to assist with enforcement.
45 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
2.1. Agreements
The requirements for different agreement ―instruments‖ are very specific. For comprehensive guidance, users should consult the following resources:
The Washington Office has a grants and agreements Website that identifies grants and agreements contacts for the WO and each region. This Website also addresses Forest Service policies and applicable regulations, provides all necessary templates and forms and provides training tools including an Agreements Desk Guide. This Website is located at: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/aqm/grants/index.php.
Involving grants and agreements specialists early in the process of developing a formalized partnership agreement will assure that partnerships get started on the right track.
The Partnership Resource Center is another valuable Website with a great deal of information on partnerships. Of particular note is ―The Partnership Guide‖ which addresses building relationships with partners, how non-profits work, challenges in working with partners and how to communicate successes. This guide may be found at: http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/partnership-guide/.
2.2. National Partners
National Off-Highway Vehicle Conservation Council (NOHVCC) http://www.nohvcc.org/
Blue Ribbon Coalition http://www.sharetrails.org
The Wilderness Society http://wilderness.org
Wildlands CPR http://wildlandscpr.org
2.3. Regional and Local OHV Partner Examples
Huckleberry Flats OHV Trail http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/willamette/recreation/ohv/huckleberry/index.html
Rocky Mountain Region Guide for Collecting Route Information http://fsweb.r2.fs.fed.us/travel -mgmt/
Colorado Off-Highway Vehicle Coalition TIGeR Mapping Project http://tiger.cohvco.org/
3. Volunteers
Volunteers can assist with all aspects of travel management, including engineering, education, enforcement and evaluation. Many groups are interested in maintaining and constructing trails, habitat restoration projects and installing signs and barriers. Volunteers may be interested in patrolling trails or distributing MVUMs and other information for responsible ridership. They can also report OHV violations.
3.1. Finding Volunteers Interested in Travel Management Projects
While it is likely that members of the motorized recreation community will be the first to volunteer, keep in mind that there are potentially many other groups that have a vested interest in the designation, maintenance, monitoring and enforcement of a sustainable system of roads, trails and areas for motor vehicle use. When considering who your stakeholders are and which individuals and groups might be 46 Chapter 3. Implementation Strategies interested in participating in volunteering, consult with the travel management planning interdisciplinary (ID) team on your forest, in particular, those individuals who were involved in ―left-side‖ analysis and any public involvement or collaboration efforts.
You might also consider individuals and groups with the following interests: Recreation: motorized and non-motorized Hunting
Fishing
Wildlife Viewing Habitat Conservation Watershed Restoration Wilderness Industry: motorized a non-motorized recreation
Other Agencies: local, county, State, Federal and tribal
If, on the other hand, it appears that you do not have any readily identifiable individuals or groups to engage in partnerships or as volunteers, consider consulting the volunteer coordinator assigned to your region or research station. A list of volunteer coordinators is available at http://www.fs.fed.us/volunteer/volunteer-coordinators.shtml.
Finally, you may want to consult one or more of the national level databases that provide volunteer lists and placement services for public lands agencies, including the Forest Service (see Resources).
3.2. Resources
Websites Offering General Guidance for Forest Service Volunteer Pr ograms
Youth, Volunteer and Hosted Programs Website at http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/yvh/ . Of particular interest is the Forest Service Volunteer Coordinator Guide. This guide addresses the following:
o Law and policy o The importance of a volunteer coordinator o Liability concerns o What volunteers can do o Recruitment, the application process and evaluation o Volunteer agreements o Training, safety and supervision o Use of equipment o Uniforms o Reimbursement and record keeping o Recognition
On this same Website, go to the ―Volunteer Resources‖ page for a list of volunteer program tools and resources including a number of volunteer partner organizations, other Federal agency programs and volunteer forms. 47 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Forest Service Partnership Resource Center offers on-line resources for volunteers and Forest Service employees who work with volunteers (http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resourc es/volunteers/index.php)
Websites that Assist with Volunteer Recruitment
Volunteer.gov/gov (http://www.volunteer.gov/gov/ ). This easy-to-use portal provides information about public sector volunteer opportunities. Users can search for opportunities by keyword, State, activity, partner and date. Volunteer.gov/gov, part of the USA Freedom Corps Network, is a partnership between the U.S. Department of Agriculture, other State and Federal agencies and the Corporation for National and Community Service (http://www.nationalservice.org/).
Units can also post volunteer opportunities to Volunteer.gov/gov but you must have an administrative profile to do this. Contact your unit or regional volunteer coordinator to find out how to get a profile or to have the volunteer coordinator post the opportunity for you.
American Hiking Society‘s ―Get Involved‖ Directory (http://www.americanhiking.org/get -involved/ )
AARP‘s Community Service Programs (http://www.aarp.org/volunteer/)
Examples of Successful OHV Volunteer Programs
Adopt-A-Trail Program on the San Bernardino National Forest http://www.sbnfa.org/ohvadopt.php
Central Oregon OHV Volunteers http://www.fs.fed.us/r6/centraloregon/re creation/cohvops/volunteers.shtml
San Bernardino National Forest Foundation OHV Education Outreach http://www.sbnfa.org/ohvtrail.php
Sample Adopt-A-Trail Program Conditions
http://www.wilderness.net/toolboxes/documents/volunteerPartner/Adopt -a- Trail%20Agreement_template.rtf
Monitoring Guidance
http://www.partnershipresourcecenter.org/resources/monitoring -evaluation/index.php
Motorcycle Enthusiast at Kiosk, Pacific Southwest Region
48
CHAPTER 4. DEVELOPING AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The purpose of this section is to assist in defining a strategy that utilizes the appropriate tools to successfully implement travel management decisions. Typically most decisions require multiple years to fully implement and require a great deal of planning and preparation. The implementation plan should be dynamic and flexible, so that implementation can be responsive to new information received through monitoring, public and employee feedback and other sources.
STEERING COMMITTEE
Many forests establish a travel management implementation steering committee. A steering committee improves accountability and can provide direction when problems are encountered. Committee members should include line officers, representatives from the recreation and engineering staff, a NEPA specialist, law enforcement and public contact and other specialists depending on the issues related to travel management. The committee will function best if small, perhaps four to six people and should meet regularly regarding the implementation plan, at least quarterly.
The role of the committee is to layout a multi-year plan and to serve as a clearinghouse for issues and identify solutions. They may report directly to the district ranger or forest supervisor and where appropriate to the regional office on implementation progress and possible issues. This committee should also:
Report back to stakeholders and other interested individuals about the implementation progress,
Identify funding and resource needs and make recommendations for budgeting and work force planning to forest leadership teams,
Provide oversight for the annual reissuance of the MVUMs and
Review monitoring reports.
Implementation Leader
Just as an IDT leader is paramount to a good NEPA process, an implementation leader is equally important to successful implementation of route and area designations. The individual should have good project management skills, people skills and an understanding of the issues related to the decision. The implementation leader is the interface between the steering committee and the field and may be the point of contact for interested publics and partners. This individual is responsible for keeping implementation on course and meeting milestones set by the district ranger or forest supervisor and steering committee.
Integration of Resource Programs
Integration and collaboration among resource areas is important to successful implementation. Integrate resource programs to focus on accomplishing targets and maximizing financial capacity.
49 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
A steering committee can work with resource program leaders to develop an ongoing strategy to fund and implement travel management decisions. Projects that meet multiple resource objectives can result in multiple target accomplishment while meeting the goals of the implementation plan.
Incorporating Tasks from Chapter 2
Tasks identified in Chapter 2 are provided in the table entitled ―List of Chapter 2 Tasks‖ (http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/implementation/documents/ListOfChapter2Tasks.doc ). This may be useful in identifying what to include in the Implementation Plan. Not every ranger
district or National Forest will need to initiate every task on the list. Units can identify and select the tasks that are responsive to their travel management decisions and issues. The desired outcome is to have an annual plan and a long range plan of work with goals and milestones.
SUGGESTED ELEMENTS TO INCLUDE IN AN IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
Projects and tasks that need to be completed
Priority of projects and tasks to help develop an annual work plan with a focus on the highest priority projects first
Timeline including various milestones - A Gantt chart or other technique may be useful to help communicate the milestones, track progress and identify conflicts between plan elements
Implementation cost
Possible funding sources (appropriated dollars, partners, volunteers, grants, etc.) Methods for completing the work (force account, volunteers, contracts, etc.) Person and staff responsible for ensuring completion Template for Implementation Plan:
Examples
Template for Implementation Plan: (http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/implementation/documents/ImplementationPlanT emplate.doc )
Dixie National Forest Implementation Guide: http://fsweb.dixie.r4.fs.fed.us/projects/mtp/index.shtml
50
CHAPTER 5. LIST OF PREPARERS
Ken Anderson, Team Leader, Wallowa-Whitman National Forest Nancy Brunswick, Cibola National Forest Tom Condos, Grand Mesa, Uncompahgre and Gunnison National Forests
Ruth Doyle, Southwestern Region
Tera Little, Southwestern Region
Rob Potts, National Forests and Grasslands in Texas
Andy Sadler, Francis Marion and Sumter National Forests
Donna Sheehy, Northern Region
Deidre St. Louis, Washington Office
51
SIGN GUIDE APPENDIX. SIGNING FOR THE TRAVEL MANAGEMENT RULE
The following sections discuss signing for the Travel Management Rule.
1. Introduction
1.1 Signs and Travel Management 1.2 Sign Plans – The First Step 1.2.1 Travel Management Sign Plans 1.3 Sign Standards and Guidelines
2. Sign Types
2.1 Route Markers 2.1.1 Route Markers for Roads 2.1.2 Route Markers for Motor Vehicle Trails 2.2 Portal Signs 2.3 Travel Management Signs 2.4 Boundary Signs 2.5 Visitor Information Boards 2.6 Posters
3. Special Situations
3.1 Coincident Routes and Mixed Use Routes 3.1.1 Highway-legal Vehicles Only Sign 3.1.2 Route Markers on Maintenance Level 1 Coincident Routes 3.2 Dispersed Camping Sites 3.3 Reference Location Signs (Mile Post Markers)
53 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Interagency OHV Trailhead Sign
1. Introduction
The objective of the Signs and Travel Management section of the Implementation Guide is to achieve agency-wide consistency in the use of signs to reinforce travel management decisions so that visitors traveling across the country can expect to encounter similar signing on all National Forests and Grasslands. This section provides an overview of current Forest Service signing policy, standards, principles and guidelines as they relate to implementation of the Travel Management Rule and other travel management decisions. The Signs and Travel Management section addresses the use of typical signs and common signing situations. It does not address every type of sign or poster that may be used, unusual situations or placement and installation requirements.
More complete information on all Forest Service signs and posters, requirements, details, technical data and specifications and placement and installation information is contained in:
FSM 7716.42
EM7100-15 Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service : http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/eng/pubs/htmlpubs/em7100-15/pdfindex.htm
MUTCD – Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices: http://www.mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/
54
Signing for the Travel Management Rule
1.1. Signs and Travel Management
Ensuring that the public clearly understands the designations shown on the Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) is critical to successful implementation and enforcement of the Travel Management Rule.
Because 36 CFR 261.13 moves us toward a "closed unless designated open" situation, the MVUM, in conjunction with route markers, should be sufficient to clearly communicate where motor vehicle use is allowed and not allowed. The use of travel management signs may provide additional clarification in special situations. However, use of these signs may also cause confusion for users since not all closed roads and areas will be signed. Use of travel management signs to supplement the MVUM is optional and should be well thought out in a sign plan that considers long term sign maintenance costs and consistency within and across unit boundaries.
Agency-wide consistency and uniformity in the use of signs to help communicate travel management decisions will assist in implementation and enforcement efforts. Lack of sign uniformity and consistency will most likely lead to confusion, which will undermine public support and will make implementation and enforcement of the Travel Management Rule difficult.
Signing all routes as either open or closed is not consistent with current sign policy or guidelines and is unnecessary to fulfill the requirements of the Travel Management Rule. Units are not to use such signing. Although some units have used this sign strategy to manage access in the past, enforcing travel management decisions with this type of signing could be problematic. In most cases, experience has shown this practice to be ineffective in preventing the proliferation of unauthorized routes and results in additional sign procurement, installation and maintenance costs.
1.2. Sign Plans – The First Step
Units should determine specific sign strategies prior to issuing the MVUM by developing sign plans.
Planning is essential for accomplishing FS signing objectives in an orderly, consistent and cost- effective manner. Sign plans provide the framework for managing an effective and consistent sign program. They help identify the signs needed so unnecessary signs are not installed or existing signs can be removed.
Sign plans address specific sign needs, identify the appropriate use of signs and posters and document all sign related decisions. They may contain all signs and posters that pertain to Forest Service facilities, activities and access or may address only one aspect of signing, such as the following:
Administrative sites and boundary identification Traffic control devices for roads and trails Recreation sites and opportunities Travel management Interpretive programs and other points of interest Construction, maintenance and incident management activities
Plans should contain relevant physical, technical and management information needed to effectively administer the sign and poster program, such as the following:
Inventories Historical records Action plans including sign procurement, installation, removal and maintenance Accomplishment documentation 55 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Inspection and maintenance records
Sign plans are prepared by the district ranger and approved by the forest supervisor (FSM 7160.42c). The forest sign coordinator assists the district ranger in preparing sign plans and reviews and approves all sign requisitions prior to signs being ordered.
Refer to EM 7100-15, Chapter 2, Plans and Documentation for detailed information on developing and documenting sign plans. For examples of existing sign plans, contact your forest or regional sign coordinator.
1.2.1. Travel Management Sign Plans
Travel management sign needs should be assessed at a large scale considering forest-wide objectives for implementation and resources available for sign installation, replacement, removal and maintenance. Units should also consider current motor vehicle uses, mixed traffic designations and areas of potential enforcement challenges of motor vehicle designations.
A sign plan will result in signs that are consistent in appearance and placement; help users better understand and follow the MVUM; and will likely result in improved user compliance. An MVUM combined with a carefully planned strategy to provide the minimum number of appropriate signs, will reduce the burden on agency resources for maintenance and improve the recreational experience for forest users through better understanding of travel management rules and designations.
It is highly recommended that when a unit develops a travel management sign plan, that they focus on the minimum signs needed to begin implementation, for example, the route marker. Additional signs such as portal signs or travel management signs may always be installed at a later date, if the need arises. It is much easier to add new signs than to remove signs that the public has become dependent on. If a unit elects to use signs in addition to the route marker to help implement the MVUM, they should be used consistently and be coordinated with adjacent units as necessary. If a unit has existing travel management signs that do not meet current sign standards, a schedule to remove or transition to the current standards should be included in the sign plan.
1.3. Sign Standards and Guidelines
All units shall implement and comply with existing agency sign policy, standards and guidelines when signing for implementation of the Travel Management Rule.
Standards for placement, installation and sign design including colors, shapes and sizes shall not be modified. If different or unusual conditions or special vehicle designations exist, consult with the forest or regional sign coordinator for assistance and approval if necessary.
According to FSM 7103, Forest Service signs and posters should be planned, designed, procured, installed and maintained according to the guidance in the Engineering Management (EM) series administrative document, EM-7100-15, "Guidelines for Forest Service Signs and Posters." EM 7100-15 chapters that are of significance to travel management signing include:
Chapter 2 – Plans and Documentation. This chapter provides guidelines for developing, documenting and maintaining a comprehensive sign plan.
Chapters 3, 3A, 3B, 3C and 3D – Traffic Control Devices. These chapters provide guidelines for signs located on roads, including regulatory, warning and guide signs, placement and installation instructions and sign drawings. This information is also applicable for motorized trails. 56 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
Chapters 5, 5A and 5B – Trail Signs. These chapters provide guidelines for signs located on trails, including regulatory, warning and guide signs, placement and installation instructions and sign drawings
Chapters 6, 6A and 6B – Travel Management Signing. These chapters provide guidelines for signing travel management activities including motorized and non - motorized uses, placement and installation instructions and sign drawings. This chapter is undergoi ng some changes as we move forward with implementing the Travel Management Rule, primarily with the wording on some signs and addition of new signs. .
Chapters 10, 10A and 10B – Visitor Information Signing. These chapters provide guidelines for visitor information signing.
2. Sign Types
There are several types of signs that are used to implement the Travel Management Rule and other travel management decisions.
The most important sign is a route marker. Every reasonable effort should be made to ensure that all designated motor vehicle routes have route markers that correspond with the MVUM upon release of the MVUM or as soon as practical and that these route markers are maintained.
Other signs may be used to supplement the MVUM and route markers as determined in the sign plan. They include:
Portal signs Travel management signs Boundary signs Visitor information boards Posters
2.1. Route Markers
Consistent use of appropriate route markers to identify the designated routes is an important key to helping the public understand the MVUM and know where they can legally take motor vehicles.
At a minimum, all designated routes displayed on the MVUM should be clearly marked on the ground with route markers. Route numbers displayed on signs must match the route numbers displayed on the MVUM.
Route markers are important for:
Route identification of all NFS routes, regardless of motor vehicle designations. Guidance for public, administrative and emergency access. Successful enforcement of the MVUM. Users to know where they are and to navigate through the forest. Users to understand which routes are designated for motor vehicles.
Route markers should be installed on all NFS roads and trails regardless of whether they are shown on the MVUM. There may be authorized routes that are open to administrative or permitted use that also require route markers even though they will not be displayed on the MVUM. Route markers also communicate
57 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
the difference between closed system roads and unauthorized or decommissioned roads. First priority should be given to identifying routes shown on the MVUM. Route markers on other routes should then be installed as resources and needs allow.
Units should not use any other marking system in conjunction with route markers or in addition to route markers to indicate MVUM designations such as red, green and yellow symbols, white arrows, colored posts, flagging, etc.
Route Markers should be placed:
Only on roads and trails under Forest Service jurisdiction. At each NFS road or trail junction. At the point where Forest Service jurisdiction begins if there is no junction.
Route markers may be used for reassurance:
If it is not readily apparent which route the user may be on.
Beyond intersections on highly traveled routes.
Periodically along the route with no more than 5 miles between reassurance markers.
2.1.1. Route Markers for Roads
There are three types of route markers for roads:
Distinctive route markers (M1-7)
Are used on significant, highly traveled arterial or collector roads that encourage passenger car traffic during normal season of use.
Are typically used on Maintenance Levels 4 or 5 roads. Shall be retroreflective white on brown. Only 2 sizes are available:
o 18-inch for roads with speeds up to 40 mph. o 24-inch for roads with speeds over 45 mph.
Horizontal route markers (FM1-7H)
Are used on local or collector roads that encourage/accept passenger car traffic during normal season of use.
Are used on Maintenance Levels 3, 4 or 5 roads. Shall be retroreflective white on brown. Letter/number size is:
o 4-inch for roads with speeds up to 30 mph. o 5-inch for roads with speeds 35 to 50 mph. 6-inch for roads with speeds over 55 mph. o
58 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
Vertical route markers (FM1-7V)
Are used only on maintenance level 1 and 2 roads.
Should be retroreflective if the sign needs to be seen at night. Minimum letter and number size is 3 inches. May be :
o A brown and white retroreflective panel. o Retroreflective letters/numbers mounted on a flexible post. o A routed post on ML1 roads or ML 2 roads not open at night.
2.1.2. Route Markers for Motor Vehicle Trails
There are several methods for identifying motor vehicle trails.
#1) Vertical OHV Route Marker
This marker is similar to the road vertical route marker. It is distinguished by the word ―TR‖ at the top of the marker.
Signs may be: A brown and white retroreflective sign on a steel post or Retroreflective letters mounted on a flexible post. Minimum letter size for both is 2-inch.
(Note - In rocky areas where it is difficult to drive flexible posts, the flexible post can be mounted on a steel post which is then driven into the ground.)
#2) Route information with destinations
The trail name and number and its directions are combined with trail destinations on the same sign (FRD).
Signs are brown and white retroreflective. Minimum letter size is 2 inches if located on a trail. Reference EM 7100-15, Chapter 5 for sign layout rules. Do not sign trail destinations on roads if the road traffic cannot legally drive to that destination.
#3) Route information
The trail name and number and its directions are shown on the sign.
Signs are brown and white retroreflective.
Minimum letter size is 2 inches if sign is located on a trail.
If sign is located on a road, reference EM 7100 -15, Chapter 3 and Chapter 3A for letter sizes and sign layout.
59 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
#4) Federal Recreation Symbol assembly
The trail identification and its directions are combined with one primary federal recreation symbol.
Signs are brown and white retroreflective.
Symbol size based on the speed of approaching traffic. Reference EM 7100-15, Chapter 3A for sign layout. Minimum letter size for ID number is 2 inches for trails. Appropriate when the symbol accurately reflects the designated vehicle.
2.2. Portal Signs
Portal Signs are:
Used to inform the public that they are entering an area with mot or vehicle travel restrictions and that they should have a MVUM.
Optional – they are not required for enforcement. The MVUM is the enforcement tool. Regulatory but not specific enough to be enforceable – no dates/vehicle classes. Not needed on every NFS road or trail! Consolidate installations when feasible.
If a unit elects to use portal signs, they should be used consistently over the entire area covered by the MVUM.
Portal sign standards:
Black letters and border on retroreflective white background. Size based on the speed of the approaching vehicle. Messages may be modified or customized based on local motor vehicle designations after a review and approval by the regional sign coordinator.
Combine messages when possible such as with restrictions on snowmobiles.
Appropriate locations for portal signs include:
Principal or key access routes at National Forest boundaries.
At or as close as practical to the point of restriction.
County, township, state or federal roads which pass through National Forests. Arterial and collector NFSRs. Installations which would minimize the number of signs.
Coordinate with:
Other jurisdictions to install signs on non -FS routes.
Your Forest or Regional Sign Coordinator when modifying messages .
60 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
Portal Sign # 1:
May be used for areas with no motorized over- ENTERING MOTOR VEHICLE snow (snowmobile) designated routes. The sign RESTRICTION AREA only refers to motor vehicles use shown on the STAY ON ROUTES DESIGNATED MVUM. ON MOTOR VEHICLE USE MAP
Portal Sign #2: ENTERING MOTOR VEHICLE May be used if there is also an over-snow vehicle RESTRICTION AREA use map (OSVUM). The sign does not refer to a specific map product. STAY ON DESIGNATED ROUTES
2.3. Travel Management Signs
Ideally, the MVUM, in conjunction with route markers, should be sufficient to clearly communicate where motor vehicle use is allowed and not allowed. However, in some situations, the use of travel management signs may provide additional clarification. Use of travel management signs to supplement the MVUM is optional and should be well thought out in a sign plan that considers long term sign maintenance costs and consistency across unit boundaries.
2.3.1. Travel Management Signs and Decals
Clearly display the prohibited uses – not the allowed uses. Are a regulatory sign – shall be black and white. Are posted at the point of prohibition, typically on or next to a gate or other device. Are not used on open ML 3, 4 or 5 roads. Should refer to the MVUM or Over-Snow Vehicle Use Map when appropriate
Should match the vehicle designation on the MVUM or CFR order Typical sign sizes – 12‖ x 18‖ or 18‖ x 24‖ or decals for carsonite posts Are required for forest CFR orders issued under subpart B such as:
o Prohibitions on non-motorized, mechanized or over-snow use. o Short-term or emergency prohibitions on designated routes or areas. Are not required for:
o Motor vehicle designations. o Enforcement of the MVUM. May be used to draw attention to certain Motor Vehicle restrictions:
o In trespass or other problem areas with poor compliance from the public when other methods are ineffective. o For educational purposes when the prohibition is new to the public. o When a route has been open historically to motor vehicles. o To avoid confusion with other prohibitions on non-motorized, mechanized or over snow use. 61 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
2.3.2. Messages
Are customized and the message must be appropriate for each situation.
Keep it simple! Work with your Forest or Regional Sign Coordinator if in doubt
Remember – the more complex the designations, the more difficult the signing.
Use word messages instead of federal recreation symbols:
o For clearer understanding. o To combine vehicle classes such as: For Highway Vehicles and Standard Terra OHVs – use ―MOTOR VEHICLES‖ For Highway Vehicles, Standard Terra OHVs and motorized Over -Snow Vehicles – use ―MOTOR VEHICLES and SNOWMOBILES‖
o If the symbol is not representative of the specific vehicle designation. For instance, there are no symbols for designating vehicle width, tracked OHVs, OHVs or UTVs.
Following are several examples showing how travel management signs may be used for certain situations.
2.3.3. Examples
Example 1: Motor Vehicle Use occurring on an unautho rized trail
Post in the center of the trail. It can be used in conjunction with trail decommissioning treatments.
Example 2: Motor Vehicle Use occurring past the dispersed camping corridor distance indicated on the MVUM
The sign is placed at the end of the designated dispersed camping distance to prevent further access beyond the designated corridor.
62 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
Example 3: Short-term Emergency – all use is prohibited
The route or area is closed to ALL types of traffic, including foot traffic by a Forest Order. This option is seldom used except in emergencies such as fire or weather closures or special management situations such as protection of an eagle-nesting site.
The sign is required for enforcement as it is under a Forest Order. Placement should occur at the point of restriction.
Example 4: Trail designated for Motor Vehicles less than or equal to 50”
The sign is used where the trail width may physically allow wider vehicles but the motor vehicle designation is for OHVs less than 50 inches in width.
Example 5: Wilderness Trail – no motorized or mechanized vehicles
Placement should occur prior to the wilderness boundary and at suitable locations to allow motorized and mechanized vehicles to turn around.
Example 6: Trail seasonally designated for motorcycles only
The sign is used where the trail width may physically allow wider vehicles but the motor vehicle designation is for motorcycles only.
Note – the more complex the designations, the more difficult the signing.
Example 7: ML 2-5 Road is not designated for public motor vehicles and not shown on the MVUM. Administrative motor vehicle use is allowed or permitted.
The sign may be used where the road allows administrative motor vehicles traffic and possible misunderstandings occur when the public sees permitted motor vehicle use occurring behind the gate. Only those administrative activities with a written authorization, such as a special use permit, wood cutting permit or grazing permit can use motor vehicles behind this sign.
63 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
Example 8: ML 2-5 road seasonally designated for motor vehicles
The sign may be used where the road (or trail) is designated for seasonal motor vehicles use and violations are occurring.
2.4. Boundary Signs
Boundary signs are:
Used to put the public on notice that they are entering or le aving a designated motor vehicle area allowing cross-country use.
Optional – not required for enforcement. The MVUM is the enforcement tool. A regulatory sign. Inter-visible placed to clearly delineate the boundary on the ground. Not to be used on open ML 3, 4 or 5 roads.
Boundary sign standards:
Black letters and border on retroreflective white background. Sign panel or a decal. Messages are customized based on area Motor Vehicle designations.
Combine messages when possible with other area designations suc h as an area designated for motorized over-snow use.
Area Name should correspond to the name on the MVUM. Install Entering and Leaving signs back-to-back.
Appropriate locations for boundary signs include:
Boundaries not clearly delineated by natural featur es. Areas where potential for confusion exists. Problem areas with trespass or poor compliance from the public
64 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
2.4.1. Examples
Entering Area Boundary Sign or decal # 1
May be used when entering an area designated for motor vehicle cross-country travel.
Leaving Area Boundary Sign or decal # 2
May be used when leaving areas designated for cross- country travel by motor vehicles
2.5. Visitor Information Boards
Travel management information can be included on visitor information boards at trailheads and campgrounds or be displayed on a visitor information board located at a forest entrance or at administrative offices such as district and supervisor offices.
Visitor information boards provide important public information including: Recreation activities Visitor registration provisions
Environmental awareness, safety and emergency information
Travel management information such as:
o Travel Management Rule requirements and local designations o MVUM or Over Snow Vehicle Use Maps o ―You are here‖ locations o Explanation of signing Equipment requirements o 65 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
They should be maintained to look professional and not appear cluttered and disorganized. Follow direction in the Built Environment Image Guide (BEIG) and EM 7100-15 – Chapter 10
Consider the following when selecting locations for visitor information boards: Safety Available parking without blocking the road
Approach sight distance to allow vehicles to get off and on the road
Consider using advance guide signs on ML 3-5 roads if the: Average daily traffic is above 100 vehicles or, Vehicle speeds are greater than 25 mph.
2.5.1. Guide Sign Options
2.5.2. Guide Sign Standards:
Size based on the speed of the approaching vehicle. Retroreflective white letters and border on brown background. Advance placement distance based on speed (Table3C-2, EM 7100-15).
2.6. Posters
Posters provide information on:
o Seasonal and temporary activities or conditions o Specific travel management information Are not permanent signs
Should be maintained to look professional
Can be creative
Not subject to the same requirements as Traffic Control Signs
Should be coordinated with the Regional Office Sign Coordinator if it is a custom order
Custom posters shall be ordered through the Government Printing Office
Refer to Chapter 11, EM 7100-15
2.6.1. Examples
Following are examples of posters that have been developed specific to the travel management rule and the MVUM. All proposed posters should be submitted to your regional sign coordinator for review.
66 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
Poster #1 – Hunting Notice HUNTERS This type of poster should be coordinated with the local State fish Motor vehicle use off designated routes, and game office. including use for game retrieval, is prohibited (36 cfr 261.13)
Motor vehicle use is restricted to only those designated roads, trails and areas as shown on the Motor Vehicle Use Map
For more information, please contact your local USDA Forest Service or Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks office
Poster #2 – Generic Notice MOTOR VEHICLE USE OFF This poster can be used in any DESIGNATED ROUTES, location. It can be used with IS PROHIBITED UNDER 36 CFR 261.13 cooperators who maintain OHV MOTOR VEHICLE USE IS RESTRICTED TO trails, OHV groups or others. This DESIGNATED ROADS, TRAILS AND AREAS type of poster might be very useful AS SHOWN ON THE MOTOR VEHICLE USE MAP where compliance with travel These restrictions are necessary management decisions is difficult to Cooperator Logo to protect your National Forest resources. enforce. For more information, please contact your local USDA Forest Service office.
Educational Posters
67 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
3. Special Situations
3.1. Coincident Routes and Mixed Use Routes
National Forest System (NFS) roads are designed primarily for use by highway-legal vehicles (motor vehicles that are licensed or certified for general operation on public roads within the State) such as a passenger car or log truck. Some NFS roads also provide recreational access for non-highway legal OHVs either as a coincident route or a mixed use route.
A coincident route is defined as a single route that is managed as part of two different inventoried routes in the Forest Transportation Atlas. An example is an NFSR that is also a National Forest System trail. There are two types of coincident routes:
1. Concurrent coincident route: a coincident route on which the uses are simultaneous and must be managed for mixed traffic.
2. Separate coincident route: a coincident route on which the uses are not simultaneous but separate so the route is not managed for mixed traffic.
Separate use periods may occur by:
Specific times such as weekday and weekend
Seasons such as a summer road and a winter snow trail
Motorized mixed use is defined as designation of a NFS road for use by both highway-legal and non- highway-legal motor vehicles. The use occurs at the same time but the road is not managed as a trail.
Designating NFS roads for both highway-legal and off-highway legal vehicles involves safety and engineering considerations. Decisions to manage and sign coincident routes and mixed use routes must be informed by engineering analysis.
Refer to FSH 7709.55, Chapter 30, Engineering Analysis, EM-7700-30, Guidelines for Engineering Analysis of Motorized Mixed Use on National Forest System Roads and EM 7100-15, Section 3A.7.3 Coincident Routes for specific signs and requirements. Mitigation is generally necessary for road segments with high probability and high severity of crashes and for roads with low probability and high severity of crashes. Mitigation may be necessary for road segments with high probability and low severity of crashes. If signing is identified as needed for mitigation, routes shall be signed before concurrent use occurs.
Examples of signing to mitigate crash risk include:
1. ―Share the Road‖ signs
2. Standard State or local signs (if approved for Forest Service roads) where users are accustomed to State or local signs that do not conform to Forest Service Standards.
3. Route marking to ensure that non-highway-legal vehicle routes and motorized mixed use routes are clearly identified.
4. ―Highway-Legal Vehicles Only‖ signs may be used to clearly identify the termini of road sections designated for motorized mixed use.
5. Motorized trail crossing signs may be used where motorized trails cross the road.
6. Other appropriate regulatory and warning signs contained in EM 7100 -15, Sign and Poster Guidelines, which are consistent with the MUTCD and USDA Forest Service standards.
68 Signing for the Travel Management Rule
7. Signing installed on roads should be designed to meet all requirements of the MUTCD and EM 7100-15, Sign and Poster Guidelines.
3.1.1. Highway-legal Vehicles Only Sign To assist in signing of coincident routes and routes designated for highway-legal vehicles only, the WO has approved a new regulatory sign.
Use
At the beginning of a road where ―non- highway legal vehicle‖ use is not allowed for the entire length.
At intersections where ―non-highway legal vehicle‖ traffic HIGHWAY can access the road designated for ―highway-legal vehicles only‖ from other mixed use roads or OHV trail systems. LEGAL
Where ―non-highway legal vehicle‖ traffic is no longer allowed after sections of where it has been allowed. VEHICLES
After the appropriate engineering analysis to warrant its use. ONLY
In states where street legal OHVs driven by licensed drivers are allowed on all public roads and are considered to be a highway-legal vehicle. Using a sign with the ATV symbol with the red slash is not appropriate in those locations to reinforce the highway -legal vehicle designation and may be confusing as the ATV or other OHV may actually be a highway-legal vehicle.
18 x 24 3 inch letters low-volume road; low speed < 35mph, 24 x 30 4 inch letters low volume or conventional road, speed = > 40
3.1.2. Route Markers on Maintenance Level 1 Coincident Routes
A Maintenance Level 1 road is marked with a vertical route marker and the road is also managed as a designated motor vehicle trail (coincident route). If the motor vehicle trail follows the same route as the maintenance level 1 road, use the same number as the road and use the road vertical route marker to identify the route on the ground. It is not be necessary to install another route marker for the trail in addition to the existing road marker. A small sticker with the word ―TR‖ could be applied to the top of the road vertical route marker if there is room on the sign. This sticker would remain as long as the road is classified in an operational maintenance level 1 category.
3.2. Dispersed Camping Sites
Signing specific dispersed camping sites within a corridor designated for dispersed camping is not necessary. If dispersed camping is allowed within designated corridors, then any place along that corridor is legal for dispersed camping as long as there is no resource damage occurring. Such signing would require additional monitoring and increased maintenance needs. If corridors are not designated and routes to dispersed sites are designated as a road or trail instead, then a standard route marker is all that is necessary.
69 Off-Highway Vehicle Program Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide
3.3. Reference Location Signs (Mile Post Markers)
Reference location signs (D10-1) are intended to serve as mile point location guides for motorists and as a means to identify road locations. Reference location signs may be erected on any NFSR. Reference location signs are fully retroreflective and have white legend and borders on green background when used on NFSRs. They may have a white legend and borders on brown background when used on NFSTs. Use of the heading MILE shall be used to distinguish the reference location sign from the vertical route marker.
3.3.1. Reference Location Sign Sizes
FD10-1a FD10-1b D10-1 Low-volume roads <400 SADT Item Conventional road Typical, 40 mph and + Minimum, <35 mph >400 SADT (inches (inches) (inches) Width 10 6 5 Numbers (ASA) 6 (Series D) 4 (Series D) 3 (Series D) MILE heading (ASA) 4 (Series D) 2 (Series B) 2 (Series B)
Reference Location Signs should be used when:
1. Changes in seasonal designations occur along a route and are noted on the MVUM by mile post tick marks;
2. Dispersed camping is designated between certain mile posts; or
3. It is not obvious as to where the designation actually begins or changes on the ground. Use the exact mile post number as shown on the MVUM. Decimals are shown as follows.
70 Appendix C – Tonto National Forest 2014 TM COMMUNICATION AND EDUCATION ACTION PLAN
Target Date Activity/Action Audience Responsible Within one year of Information Education Materials: Internal, Local Community, Tribes, TM Implementation Strategy the decision and -Develop one page overview and Q&A/Talking Points Special Interest, All Forest outdoor Team Leader: PAO prior to MVUM Handout for Tonto National Forest Travel Management enthusiasts release and that can be distributed with MVUM. Should be distribution distributed prior to release of MVUM to internal audience. Eventually post to internal and external websites when MVUM are being distributed.
-Utilize Key Themes and Messages as information to be incorporated into news releases and power point presentations for training and information sharing.
-Develop comment card for external audience feedback. Compiled comment card information (It could include list key contacts for upset/angry presented to the Implementation TM individuals to contact.) Create web and hard copy Task Force at their biannual version compiled biannually. meetings. Any action items identified by TM Implementation Strategy -Develop packet of materials appropriate for each Tonto Team or TM Implementation Task Districts will be responsible to National Forest vehicle: Packet to include: One page Force are assigned to district or distribute packets to put in overview, Q&A Talking Points handout, MVUM, forest personnel, or Task Force vehicles. Comment card and other supporting information. Working Group and implemented.
-Share key educational products with neighboring forests.
Within a year after - Letters and/or visits to Magistrates, OHV dealers, Internal, Local Community, Tribes, Patrol Captain will coordinate MVUM is released. sporting goods stores, motorsports vendors etc. Special Interest, All Forest outdoor with Magistrates enthusiasts
-Update Forest website with information packets listed All Forest outdoor enthusiasts above, MVUM, Interactive MVUM, downloads for personal devices for MVUM. See Attachment 2.
1
Target Date Activity/Action Audience Responsible Ongoing - when Internal Training: All Tonto National Forest Employees at TM Implementation Strategy decision is released Topic Examples for Training: all levels. Hold session for SO Team: -Training on safety employees and hold sessions at each District Rangers and Forest -Talking Points and Themes District. Include Travel Plan LEO, PAO, Engineering and -Dealing with disgruntled folks Implementation as a topic at District Recreation Staffs -Role playing exercises Orientations. Train new employees on -District specific issues and challenges travel management and MVUM. -Site visit to district to location where site specific implementation issues/challenges can be illustrated and discussed -Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM) for the Tonto National Forest
Goal: All Forest Employees are well versed regarding the Designation of: -Routes; -OHV Areas; -Permit Zones.
Be able to understand and interpret MVUM map to answer the following site specific questions: Can we use a motorized vehicle to: -retrieve big game here? -dispersed camp here? -gather firewood here? -travel cross-country off designated routes?
Be able to explain and show how to download MVUM on personal devices.
Be knowledgeable of and share information regarding state OHV laws.
2
Target Date Activity/Action Audience Responsible Within a year of External Training: Volunteers, partners, Forest outfitter & TM Implementation Strategy MVUM being Topic Examples for Training: guides, cooperating agencies including Team: published and after -Training on safety Arizona Game and Fish, Tonto Natural District Rangers and employee training -Talking Points-what they are, how to use them Bridge and Lost Dutchman State Forest/District LEOs, PAO, sessions -Site visit to district to location where site specific Parks, Usery Mountain Recreation Engineering and District implementation issues/challenges can be discussed Area, McDowell Regional Park, Agua Recreation Specialists Fria and Tonto National Monuments, Goal: and Tribal Communities listed in Volunteer, partners and cooperating agencies arewell Attachment 1 of this Appendix. versed regarding the topics listed above for Tonto National Forest employees.
3
Target Date Activity/Action Audience Responsible When decision MVUM development and distribution: All Forest outdoor enthusiasts TM Implementation Strategy document is -Produce and distribute a MVUM that is clear, concise, Team: completed and and readable. GIS specialist gone through District Specialists objection process -Produce Interactive Travel Map (ITM)*
Within a year after -Develop and provide applications to download MVUM MVUM is available on personal devices including Garmin GPS, Smart Phones, Tablets and i-pads. Examples can be found on Coconino, and Santa Fe websites.
-Provide MVUM information at strategically located and specifically designed information kiosks along forest roads and at trailheads (Additional NEPA may be required.) Identify current kiosks where information could be added.
Within a year of the -Produce map and list of existing and proposed kiosk District Recreation Specialists decision locations for NEPA and implementation. and Landscape Architect
-Continue overseeing volunteer efforts with all TM Implementation Task Force partners involved in TM Implementation Strategy and partnership opportunity Projects. -Identify partners and grant opportunities to produce Supplemental color Travel maps Forest wide or for Within two years of permit zones (individual or groups of permit zones) See the decision examples of mapping projects in Attachment 3 of this Appendix.
*ITM is maintained by Geospatial Service and Technology Center. The Tonto National Forest Website would link to their sit at http://sxgstcgis002.ds.fs.fed.us/TravelAccess/index.jsp
4
Target Date Activity/Action Audience Responsible Per Forest Travel Road and Trail Signing: All Forest outdoor enthusiasts TM Implementation Strategy Management Sign -Consistently sign designated routes, OHV Areas, and Team: Engineering, Forest Sign Plan Implementation Permit Zones Coordinator, GIS Specialist, Schedule District Rangers, District -Identify Portals to install Forest Entry Signs identifying Recreation Specialists and Law forest wide prohibition on cross-country travel Enforcement.
-Produce map and list of Forest Entry signs by district to order and install
Apply for grant to install Portal signs and/or utilize volunteers coordinated by the TM Implementation Task Force.
Ongoing when Field Presence: MVUMs have been All field going employees will attend TM produced Implementation Strategy training and will become well versed and familiar with MVUM. Field going employees will be expected to contact visitors regarding MVUM. The opportunity to expand the current TRAL and OHV ambassador programs to forest wide programs will be pursued.
Law Enforcement Patrols: -Saturation Patrols coordinated with Law Enforcement and Arizona Game and Fish on busy weekends and holidays to provide information regarding TM and MVUMs
-Set expectations for patrols: -Establish schedule of patrols for key weekends and holidays -Employees have attended training and are well versed and familiar with the MVUM. -All visitors encountered will be contacted and provided TM information
5
Target Date Activity/Action Audience Responsible When MVUMs have TM and MVUM information included in AZ G&F and All Forest outdoor enthusiasts TM Implementation Strategy been produced State Parks Publications: Team: PAO -Work with the state to include OHV area and permit zone information in Arizona Game & Fish and Arizona State Parks publication OHV Guide: and next publication of Places to Ride (currently being revised).
-Work with Arizona Game & Fish to include TM information pertaining to the Tonto National Forest within the 2014-2015 license information pamphlet and website.
-Staff TM information/Education Booth at AZ G&F Outdoor EXPO in Phoenix in 2014 or 2015 depending on timing of decision and when MVUMs are produced.
Ongoing - when TM Permit zone and OHV area implementation: All Forest outdoor enthusiasts TM Implementation Strategy decision is released Consistent information disseminated distinguishing Team: Mesa, Globe, and Cave and when additional differences between OHV areas and permit zones. Creek District Rangers and analysis is District Recreation Specialists completed for the -Identify partners and grant opportunities to produce Permit Zones maps for OHV areas and permit zones (individual or groups of permit zones) See examples of mapping projects at end of this document.
Ongoing- within a Update Fuelwood permits: Fuelwood Permit Holders TM Implementation Strategy year of TM decision Work with timber staff and RO TM contacts to update Team Leader: and Timber Staff being released language in fuelwood permits to provide appropriate TM information regarding off-road travel within fuelwood permit areas.
Long-term Education Actions: • Conduct Additional Analysis for barrier construction proposed to implement new permit zones. Work with Forest Conservation Education Team and Forest Fire Prevention Team to incorporate Motorized Travel information into K-12 instruction at county school districts. Work with existing school outreach programs, Conservation Education, Fire Prevention and Wilderness etc.
• Translate TM information packets into Spanish.
6
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Communication and Education Plan Target Audiences/Partners for Communication and Education Efforts
TONTO NF TRIBAL MAILING LIST (Non-NAGPRA) Tonto National Forest Travel Management Implementation north of the Gila and Salt River Baseline (most of the Forest) will be coordinated with Ft. McDowell Yavapai Nation, Yavapai-Prescott Tribe, Yavapai- Apache Nation, Tonto Apache Tribe, San Carlos Apache Tribe, White Mountain Apache Tribe, Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community, Hopi Tribe, and Zuni Tribe. Travel Management Implementation south of the Gila and Salt River Baseline (southern part of Globe District only) will be coordinated with the same Tribes except, substitute Gila River Indian Community for Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community. SCOTT WOOD – Forest Tribal Liaison will coordinate with Tribes NOTE: This list is current as of 12/03/2013. All entries subject to change without regularity or notice.
Fort McDowell Yavapai Nation Bernadine Burnette, Vice President Ft. McDowell Yavapai Nation P.O. Box 17779 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269
Mr. Phil Dorchester, General Manager Ft. McDowell Yavapai Nation P.O. Box 17779 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269
Yavapai-Prescott Tribe Mr. Ernest Jones, Sr., President Yavapai-Prescott Tribe 530 E. Merritt Prescott, Arizona 86301
Yavapai-Apache Nation Mr. David Kwail, Chairman Yavapai-Apache Nation 2400 W. Datsi Street Camp Verde, AZ 86322
Mr. Chris Coder, Director of Cultural and Historical Preservation Yavapai-Apache Nation 2400 W. Datsi Street Camp Verde, AZ 86322
Mr. Vincent Randall, Apache Culture Director P.O. Box 21 Clarkdale, AZ 86324
1
Appendix C – Attachment 1 Ms. Gertrude Smith, Yavapai Culture Director Yavapai-Apache Nation 2400 W. Datsi Street Camp Verde, AZ 86322
Tonto Apache Tribe Mr. Wally Davis, Jr., Vice Chairman Tonto Apache Res. #30 Payson, Arizona 85541
Ms. Melissa Durbin EPA Coordinator Tonto Apache Res. #30 Payson, Arizona 85541
San Carlos Apache Tribe Mr. Terry Rambler, Chairman San Carlos Apache Tribe P.O. Box "0", #3 San Carlos Ave. San Carlos, Arizona 85550
Ms. Vernelda Grant, Tribal Archeologist & Director of Historic Preservation and Archaeology Department San Carlos Apache Tribe P.O. Box "0", #3 San Carlos Ave. San Carlos, Arizona 85550
Alex Ritchie Attorney General, San Carlos Apache Tribe P.O. Box “0”, 16 San Carlos Ave. San Carlos, AZ 85550
White Mountain Apache Tribe Mr. Ronnie Lupe, Chairman White Mountain Apache Tribe P.O. Box 700 Whiteriver, Arizona 85941
Mr. Ramon Riley, Cultural Resource Director White Mountain Apache Tribe Apache Cultural Center P.O. Box 507 Fort Apache, Arizona 85926
Mr. Mark T. Altaha, Historic Preservation Officer White Mountain Apache Tribe BIA – Fort Apache Agency P.O. Box 507 Fort Apache, Arizona 85926
2
Appendix C – Attachment 1 Mr. Jim Palmer, Attorney White Mountain Apache Tribe Legal Department P.O. Box 2110 Whiteriver, Arizona 85941
Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community Ms. Diane Enos, President Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 10,005 E. Osborn Rd. Scottsdale, Arizona 85256
Mr. Shane Anton, Supervisor, Cultural Preservation Program Salt River Pima-Maricopa Indian Community 10,005 E. Osborn Rd. Scottsdale, AZ 85256
Gila River Indian Community Governor Gregory Mendoza Gila River Indian Community P.O. Box 97 Sacaton, AZ 85247
Barnaby V. Lewis, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Gila River Indian Community P.O. Box 2140 Sacaton, AZ 85247
Hopi Tribe Mr. Leigh Kuwanwisiwma, Director Cultural Preservation Office The Hopi Tribe P.O. Box 123 Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039
Mr. LeRoy N. Shingoitewa, Chairman The Hopi Tribe P.O. Box 123 Kykotsmovi, AZ 86039
Zuni Pueblo Mr. Kurt Dongoske, Director Pueblo of Zuni Heritage and Historic Preservation Office P.O. Box 1149 Zuni, NM 87327-1149
Mr. Arlen Qwetaki, Sr., Governor Pueblo of Zuni Heritage and Historic Preservation Office P.O. Box 339 Zuni, NM 87327
3
Appendix C – Attachment 1
2014 TNF City/Town Mayors
APACHE JUNCTION, City of
Mayor John Insalaco, Mayor of Apache Junction 300 E Superstition Blvd Apache Junction, AZ 85119 (480) 323-6752 [email protected] Term expires: 2016
CAREFREE, Town of
Mayor David Schwan, Mayor of Carefree PO Box 740 Carefree, AZ 85377 (602) 722-6930 [email protected] Term expires: 2016
CAVE CREEK, Town of
Mayor Vincent Francia, Mayor of Cave Creek 37622 N Cave Creek Rd Cave Creek, AZ 85331 (480) 488-6612 [email protected] Term expires: 2016
FOUNTAIN HILLS, Town of
Mayor Linda M Kavanagh, Mayor of Fountain Hills 16705 E Ave of the Fountains Fountain Hills, AZ 85268 (480) 816-5101 [email protected] Term expires: 2014
GLOBE, City of
Mayor Terence Wheeler, Mayor of Globe 150 N Pine St Globe, AZ 85501 (928) 425-9683 [email protected] Term expires: 2016
4
Appendix C – Attachment 1 MESA, City of
Mayor Scott Smith, Mayor of Mesa PO Box 1466 Mesa, AZ 85211 (480) 644-2388 [email protected] Term expires: 2017
MIAMI, Town of
Mayor Rosemary Castaneda, Mayor of Miami 500 W Sullivan St Miami, AZ 85539 (928) 473-4403 [email protected] Term expires: 2014
PAYSON, Town of
Mayor Kenny Evans, Mayor of Payson 303 N Beeline Hwy Payson, AZ 85541 (928) 474-5242 x222 [email protected] Term expires: 2016
PHOENIX, City of
Mayor Greg Stanton, Mayor of Phoenix 200 W Washington St 11th Fl Phoenix, AZ 85003 (602) 262-7111 Term expires: 2016
SCOTTSDALE, City of
Mayor W.J. "Jim" Lane, Mayor of Scottsdale 3939 N Drinkwater Blvd Scottsdale, AZ 85251 (480) 312-2433 [email protected] Term expires: 2017
5
Appendix C – Attachment 1 SUPERIOR, Town of
Mayor Jayme Valenzuela, Mayor of Superior 204 Harrington Pl Superior, AZ 85173 (520) 689-5752
[email protected] Term expires: 2018
2014 TNF County Boards of Supervisors Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties
Gila County
Tommie Martin - District 1 Office: Gila County Complex 610 E HWY 260 Payson, Arizona 85547 Phone: (928) 474-2029 Fax: (928) 474-0802 [email protected]
Michael Pastor - District 2 Office: Gila County Courthouse 1400 E. Ash Street Globe, Arizona 85501 Phone: (928) 402-8753 Fax: (928) 402-0190 [email protected]
John Marcanti - District 3 Office: Gila County Courthouse 1400 E. Ash Street Globe, Arizona 85501 Phone: (928) 402-8726 Fax: (928) 402-8882 [email protected]
6
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Maricopa County
Denny Barney Maricopa County Supervisor, District 1 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 506-1776 [email protected]
Bruce Bartholomew, Chief of Staff [email protected]
Steve Chucri Maricopa County Supervisor, District 2 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 506-7431 [email protected]
Page Gonzales, Chief of Staff [email protected]
Andy Kunasek Maricopa County Supervisor, District 3 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 506-7562 [email protected]
Jim Bloom, Chief of Staff [email protected]
Clint L. Hickman Maricopa County Supervisor, District 4 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 506-7642 [email protected]
Scott Isham, Chief of Staff [email protected]
7
Appendix C – Attachment 1 Mary Rose Wilcox Maricopa County Supervisor, District 5 301 W. Jefferson, 10th Floor Phoenix, Arizona 85003 (602) 506-7092 [email protected]
Terri Leija, Chief of Staff [email protected]
Pinal County
Pete Rios - District 1 Supervisor
Florence P.O. Box 827 Florence, AZ 85132 520-866-7830 520-866-7838
Mammoth 118 Catalina Avenue Mammoth, AZ 85618 520-487-2941 [email protected]
Cheryl Chase - District 2 Supervisor
135 N Pinal Street Florence, AZ 85132 520-866-6211 [email protected]
Stephen Miller - District 3 Supervisor 135 N Pinal Street Florence, AZ 85132 520-866-7401 [email protected]
Anthony Smith - District 4 Supervisor Maricopa Office 41600 W Smith Enke Road Suite # 128 Maricopa, AZ 85138 Phone: 520-866-3960 Fax: 520-866-3962 [email protected]
8
Appendix C – Attachment 1 Todd House - District 5 Supervisor Roy Hudson County Complex 575 N. Idaho Road, Suite 101 Apache Junction, AZ 85119 480-982-0659 [email protected]
Yavapai County
Rowle P. Simmons -District 1 Supervisor Yavapai County Administration Building 1015 Fair Street Prescott, AZ 86305-1852 Phone: (928) 771-3200 [email protected]
Thomas Thurman -District 2 Supervisor Yavapai County Dewey Annex 1400 Orchard Court Dewey, AZ 86327 Phone: (928) 771-3200 [email protected]
Chip Davis - District 3 Supervisor Yavapai County Cottonwood Annex 10 South 6th Street Cottonwood, AZ 86326 Phone: (928) 639-8110 [email protected]
Craig Brown - District 4 Supervisor Yavapai County Administration Building 1015 Fair Street Prescott, AZ 86305-1852 Phone: (928) 771-3200 [email protected]
Jack Smith - District 5 Supervisor Yavapai County Dewey Annex 1400 Orchard Court Dewey, AZ 86327 Phone: (928) 771-3200 [email protected]
9
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Arizona Congressional Delegation March 21, 2013
SENATORS
Sen. John McCain [R]
Phoenix Office: Prescott Office: 2201 East Camelback Road 122 North Cortez Street Suite 115 Suite 108 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Prescott, AZ 86301 Main: (602) 952-2410 Main: (928) 445-0833 Fax: (602) 952-8702 Fax: (928) 445-8594
Tucson Office: Washington Office: 407 West Congress Street 241 Russell Senate Office Building Suite 103 Washington, DC 20510 Tucson, AZ 85701 Main: (202) 224-2235 Main: (520) 670-6334 Fax: (202) 228-2862 Fax: (520) 670-6637 Nick Matiella, Legislative Assistant Rick Stilgenbauer [email protected] [email protected]
Sen. Jeff Flake [R]
Washington Office Phoenix Office B85 Russell Senate Office Building 2200 E Camelback Road Suite 120 Washington, DC 20510 Phoenix, AZ 85016 Phone: (202) 224-4521 Phone: (602) 840-1891
Tucson Office Buchanan Davis 6840 Oracle Road Suite 150 [email protected] Tucson, AZ 85704 Phone: (520) 575-8633 Nick Hecker, Regional Representative [email protected] 602-840-8363 602-363-8631
Clinton Chandler, Regional Director [email protected]
10
Appendix C – Attachment 1
REPRESENTATIVES
1st – Rep Ann Kirkpatrick (D) Washington Office Casa Grande Office 330 Cannon House Office Building 211 North Florence St. Washington, DC 20515 Suite 1 Phone: 202-225-3361 Casa Grande, AZ 85122 Hours: M-F, 9 am - 6 pm Phone: 520-316-0839 Hours: M-F, 9 am - 6 pm Flagstaff Office 405 N Beaver Street, Blanca Varela, Dep. District Director Suite 6 [email protected] Flagstaff, AZ 86001 Phone: 928-213-9977 Hours: M-F, 9 am - 6 pm
Ron Lee, District Director [email protected]
2nd — Rep. Ron Barber [D] Washington Office Tucson Office 1029 Longworth HOB 3945 E. Fort Lowell Road, Suite 211 Washington, DC 20515 Tucson, AZ 85712 Phone: (202) 225-2542 Phone: (520) 881-3588 Fax: (202) 225-0378 Fax: (520) 322-9490 Hours: M-F, 9 am – 5 pm Hours: M-F, 8 am – 5 pm
Sierra Vista Office Wendy Erica Werden 77 Calle Portal, Suite B-160 [email protected] Sierra Vista, AZ 85635 Cell: 520-310-2755 Phone: (520) 459-3115 Fax: (520) 459-5419 Joni Jones, Office Manager Hours: M-F, 8 am – 5 pm [email protected]
11
Appendix C – Attachment 1 3rd — Rep. Raúl Grijalva [D] DC Office: AVONDALE Office: 1511 Longworth HOB Rancho Santa Fe Center Washington, DC 20515 13065 West McDowell Road, Suite C-123 ph (202) 225-2435 Avondale, AZ 85392 fax (202) 225-1541 ph (623) 536-3388 fax (623) 536-4733
SOMERTON Office: TUCSON Office: 146 North State Avenue 738 N 5th Ave. Suite 110 Somerton AZ 85350 Tucson, AZ 85705 ph (928) 343-7933 ph (520) 622-6788 fax (928) 343-7949 fax (520) 622-0198 Mailing Address: PO Box 4105, Somerton, AZ 85350 Clara Ortiz, Office Manager [email protected]
Ruben Reyes, Deputy Dist. Director [email protected]
4th — Rep. Paul Gosar [R] Washington Office Kingman Office 504 Cannon HOB 310 N. 4th Street Washington, DC 20515 Kingman, Arizona 86401 Phone: (202) 225-2315 Fax: (202) 226-9739
Jeremy B. Harrell, Legislative Director [email protected]
Prescott Office San Tan Valley Office 122 N. Cortez Street, Suite 104 270 E. Hunt Highway, Suite 12 Prescott, AZ 86301 San Tan Valley, Arizona 85143 Phone: 928-445-1683 Fax: 928-445-3414
Penny Pew, District Director [email protected] Cell: 928-245-4618
Taylor McArthur [email protected] 928-308-1135
12
Appendix C – Attachment 1 5th — Rep. Matt Salmon [R] Washington Office Gilbert Office 2349 Rayburn House Office Building 207 North Gilbert Road Washington, DC 20515 Suite 209 Phone: 202-225-2635 Gilbert, AZ 85234 Fax: 202-226-4386 Phone: 480-699-8239 Hours: M-F, 9 am - 5:30 pm Fax: 480-699-4730 Hours: M-F, 8:30 am - 5:30 pm
Sherry Pierce [email protected]
6th — Rep. David Schweikert [R] Washington, DC Office Scottsdale District Office 1205 Longworth HOB 10603 North Hayden Rd., Ste. 108 Washington, DC 20515 Scottsdale, AZ 85260 Phone: (202) 225-2190 Phone: (480) 946-2411 Fax: (202) 225-0096 Fax: (480) 946-2446
Garrett William Archer District Representative [email protected]
Kevin Knight [email protected]
Ernestina Borquez-Smith Ernestina.Borquez- [email protected]
7th — Rep. Ed Pastor [D] Washington Office Phoenix District Office 2465 Rayburn HOB 411 North Central Avenue Washington, DC 20515 Suite 150 (202) 225-4065 Phoenix, AZ 85004 (602) 256-0551 Richard C. Patrick, Legislative Director Fax: (602) 257-9103 [email protected] Elisa de la Vara, District Director [email protected]
13
Appendix C – Attachment 1 8th — Rep. Trent Franks [R] Washington Office Glendale Office 2435 Rayburn HOB 7121 West Bell Road Suite 200 Washington, DC 20515 Glendale, AZ 85308 Phone: (202) 225-4576 Phone: 623-776-7911 Fax: (202) 225-6328 Fax: 623-776-7832 Hours: M-F, 9 am – 5 pm EST Hours: M-F, 9 am – 5 pm
Shari Farrington, Field Representative [email protected]
Justin Henry [email protected]
9th — Rep. Kyrsten Sinema [D] Washington Office Phoenix Office 1237 Longworth House Office Building 2944 N. 44th Street Washington, DC 20515 Suite 150 phone: 202-225-9888 Phoenix, AZ 85018 hours: M-F 9-5:30pm Phone: 602-956-2285
Mary Peralta [email protected]
14
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Arizona Delegation Staffer List March 21, 2013 Blanca Varela - Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick [email protected]
Buchanan Davis - Sen. Jeff Flake [email protected]
Clara Ortiz - Rep. Raúl Grijalva [email protected]
Clint Chandler - Sen. Jeff Flake [email protected]
Elisa de la Vara - Rep Ed Pastor [email protected]
Ernestina.Borquez-Smith - Rep. David Schweikert [email protected]
Garrett Archer – Rep. David Schweikert [email protected]
Jeremy Harrell – Rep. Paul Gosar [email protected]
Joni Jones - Rep. Ron Barber [email protected]
Justin Henry - Rep. Trent Franks [email protected]
Kevin Knight - Rep. David Schweikert [email protected]
Mary Peralta - Rep. Kyrsten Sinema [email protected]
Nick Hecker - Sen. Jeff Flake [email protected]
Nick Matiella - Sen. John McCain [email protected]
Penny Pew - Rep. Paul Gosar [email protected]
Richard C. Patrick - Rep. Ed Pastor [email protected]
Rick Stilgenbauer - Sen. John McCain [email protected]
Ron Lee - Rep. Ann Kirkpatrick [email protected]
Ruben Reyes - Rep. Raúl Grijalva [email protected]
Shari Farrington - Rep. Trent Franks [email protected]
Sherry Pierce - Rep. Matt Salmon [email protected]
Taylor McArthur - Rep. Paul Gosar [email protected]
Wendy Erica Welden - Rep. Ron Barber [email protected]
15
Appendix C – Attachment 1
16
Appendix C – Attachment 1
ARIZONA FEDERAL ELECTED OFFICIALS – November 28, 2012 Partisan District General Election Candidates Incumbent 2012 Winner Switch? Ann Kirkpatrick
1st Jonathan Paton Paul Gosar Ann Kirkpatrick Yes Kim Allen Ron Barber
2nd Martha McSally Trent Franks Ron Barber Yes Anthony Powell (Write-in) Raul Grijalva Benjamin
3rd Gabriela Saucedo Mercer Raul Grijalva Yes Quayle Blanca Guerra Johnnie Robinson Paul Gosar
4th Ed Pastor Paul Gosar Yes Joe Pamelia Richard Grayson Morgan Spencer David
5th Matt Salmon No Matt Salmon Schweikert Matt Jette David Schweikert David
6th Jeff Flake No Jack Anderson Schweikert Mark Salazar Ed Pastor
7th Raul Grijalva Ed Pastor No Joe Cobb Gene Scharer
8th Trent Franks Ron Barber Trent Franks Yes Stephen Dolgos Kyrsten Sinema
9th Vernon Parker N/A Kyrsten Sinema Powell Gammill
17
Appendix C – Attachment 1
The Honorable Janice K. Brewer Arizona Governor Executive Tower 1700 West Washington Street Phoenix, AZ 85007
Governor's Policy Advisor for Natural Resources is Kevin Kinsall. Faxes can be sent to his attention at 602-542-1381 or by email at [email protected]
Governor’s Director Communications is Paul Senseman: 602-542-1342 Deputy Director Communications is Kim Sabow
Phone Numbers Phoenix Office: (602) 542-4331 Fax Number: (602) 542-1381 Senate Roster Name District Party Email Room Phone (602) Fax (602)
Ed Ableser 26 D [email protected] 303A 926-4118 417-3224
Nancy Barto 15 R [email protected] 307 926-5766 417-3261
Carlyle Begay 7 D [email protected] 315 926-5862 417-3099
Andy Biggs 12 R [email protected] 205 926-4371 417-3022 President
David Bradley 10 D [email protected] 313 926-5262 926-3429
Judy Burges 22 R [email protected] 302 926-5861 417-3104
Olivia Cajero Bedford 3 D [email protected] 314 926-5835 417-3262 Rich Crandall 16 R Vacated seat on 8/31/2013
Chester Crandell 6 R [email protected] 304 926-5409 417-3105
Adam Driggs 28 R [email protected] 212 926-3016 417-3007 Majority Whip
Steve Farley 9 D [email protected] 311 926-3022 417-3128
David Farnsworth 16 R [email protected] 304 926-3020 417-3119
Steve Gallardo 29 D [email protected] 313 926-5830 417-3268 Minority Whip
Gail Griffin 14 R [email protected] 300 926-5895 417-3025 President Pro Tempore
Katie Hobbs 24 D [email protected] 308 926-5325 417-3136 Jack Jackson Jr. 7 D Vacated seat on 7/12/2013
Leah Landrum Taylor 27 D [email protected] 315 926-3830 417-3148 Linda Lopez 2 D Vacated seat on 1/13/2014
John McComish 18 R [email protected] 212 926-5898 417-3020 Majority Leader
Barbara McGuire 8 D [email protected] 314 926-5836 417-3131
Al Melvin 11 R [email protected] 303 926-4326 417-3159
Robert Meza 30 D [email protected] 311 926-3425 417-3114
Rick Murphy 21 R [email protected] 305 926-4444 417-3009
18
Appendix C – Attachment 1 Senate Roster (Continued)
Lynne Pancrazi 4 D [email protected] 213 926-3004 417-3179 Assistant Minority Leader
Steve Pierce 1 R [email protected] 301 926-5584 417-3101
Michele Reagan 23 R [email protected] 303 926-5828 417-3255
Senate Roster (Continued) Don Shooter 13 R [email protected] 200 926-4139 417-3024
Anna Tovar 19 D [email protected] 213 926-3392 417-3013 Minority Leader
Kelli Ward 5 R [email protected] 306 926-4138 417-3165
Bob Worsley 25 R [email protected] 310 926-5760 417-3091
Steve Yarbrough 17 R [email protected] 309 926-5863 417-3258
Kimberly Yee 20 R [email protected] 302 926-3024 417-3110
House Roster District Phone Name Party Email Room Fax (602) (602)
John Allen 15 R [email protected] 131 926-4916 417-3150
Lela Alston 24 D [email protected] 332 926-5829 417-3115
Brenda Barton 6 R [email protected] 111 926-4129 417-3010
Sonny Borrelli 5 R [email protected] 310 926-5051 417-3003
Paul Boyer 20 R [email protected] 309 926-4173 417-3153
Kate Brophy McGee 28 R [email protected] 304 926-4486 417-3170
Chad Campbell 24 D [email protected] 320 926-3026 417-3037 Minority Leader
Mark A. Cardenas 19 D [email protected] 122 926-3014 417-3048
Heather Carter 15 R [email protected] 303 926-5503 417-3107
Doug Coleman 16 R [email protected] 308 926-3160 417-3151
Lupe Chavira Contreras 19 D [email protected] 325 926-5284 417-3106
Andrea Dalessandro 2 D [email protected] 118 926-5342 417-3169
Jeff Dial 18 R [email protected] 110 926-5550 417-3120
Juan Carlos Escamilla 4 D [email protected] 126 926-5872 417-3112
Karen Fann 1 R [email protected] 316 926-5874 417-3001
Eddie Farnsworth 12 R [email protected] 302 926-5735 417-3122
Thomas Forese 17 R [email protected] 113 926-5168 417-3021
Rosanna Gabaldón 2 D [email protected] 117 926-3424 417-3129
Ruben Gallego 27 D [email protected] 321 926-3042 417-3117 Assistant Minority Leader
Sally Ann Gonzales 3 D [email protected] 116 926-3278 417-3127
Doris Goodale 5 R [email protected] 313 926-5408 417-3103
David M. Gowan Sr. 14 R [email protected] 206 926-3312 417-3130 Majority Leader
Rick Gray 21 R [email protected] 219 926-5993 417-3225 Majority Whip
Albert Hale 7 D [email protected] 129 926-4323 417-3160
Lydia Hernández 29 D [email protected] 119 926-3376 417-3176 19
Appendix C – Attachment 1 House Roster (Continued)
John Kavanagh 23 R [email protected] 114 926-5170 417-3108
Adam Kwasman 11 R [email protected] 344 926-5839 417-3026
Jonathan Larkin 30 D [email protected] 124 926-5058 417-3015
Debbie Lesko 21 R [email protected] 222 926-5413 417-3109
David Livingston 22 R [email protected] 341 926-4178 417-3154 House Roster (Continued)
Phil Lovas 22 R [email protected] 130 926-3297 417-3004
Stefanie Mach 10 D [email protected] 125 926-3398 417-3126
Debbie McCune Davis 30 D [email protected] 322 926-4485 417-3014
Juan Mendez 26 D [email protected] 120 926-4124 417-3017
Javan "J.D." Mesnard 17 R [email protected] 220 926-4481 417-3152 Speaker Pro Tempore
Eric Meyer 28 D [email protected] 334 926-3037 417-3111 Catherine H. Miranda 27 D [email protected] 329 926-4893 417-3116
Darin Mitchell 13 R [email protected] 307 926-5894 417-3012
Steve Montenegro 13 R [email protected] 218 926-5955 417-3168
Justin Olson 25 R [email protected] 306 926-5288 417-3161
Ethan Orr 9 R [email protected] 337 926-3235 417-3030
Lisa Otondo 4 D [email protected] 123 926-3002 417-3124
Jamescita Peshlakai 7 D [email protected] 323 926-5160 417-3002
Warren Petersen 12 R [email protected] 345 926-4136 417-3222
Justin Pierce 25 R [email protected] 112 926-5495 417-3019
Frank Pratt 8 R [email protected] 223 926-5761 417-3023
Martín J. Quezada 29 D [email protected] 324 926-5911 417-3171
Bob Robson 18 R [email protected] 217 926-5549 417-3157
Macario Saldate IV 3 D [email protected] 115 926-4171 417-3162
Carl Seel 20 R [email protected] 330 926-3018 417-3006
Andrew Sherwood 26 D [email protected] 121 926-3028 417-3038
T.J. Shope 8 R [email protected] 338 926-3012 417-3123
Steve Smith 11 R [email protected] 335 926-5685 417-3167
Victoria Steele 9 D [email protected] 318 926-5683 417-3147
David W. Stevens 14 R [email protected] 312 926-4321 417-3146
Bob Thorpe 6 R [email protected] 331 926-5219 417-3118
Andy Tobin 1 R [email protected] 221 926-5172 417-3085 Speaker of the House
Kelly Townsend 16 R [email protected] 342 926-4467 417-3018
Michelle Ugenti 23 R [email protected] 339 926-4480 417-3155
Bruce Wheeler 10 D [email protected] 333 926-3300 417-3028 Minority Whip
20
Appendix C – Attachment 1
2014 TNF Chambers of Commerce and Tourism Boards
Arizona Office of Tourism Sherry Henry - (Executive) Director 1110 W. Washington Street, Suite 155 Phoenix, Arizona 85007 Phone 602-364-3717 [email protected]
Arizona Chamber of Commerce and Industry Helen Heiden Government Relations Manager 3200 North Central Avenue Suite 1125 Phoenix, Arizona 85012 (602) 248-9172 x128 [email protected]
APACHE JUNCTION CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 567 West Apache Trail, Apache Junction, AZ 85120 PO Box 1747, Apache Junction AZ 85117-1747 (480) 982-3141 / Fax (480) 982-3234 [email protected]
Black Canyon City Chamber of Commerce P.O. Box 1919 Black Canyon City, AZ 85324 (623) 374-9797 [email protected]
Carefree and Cave Creek Chamber of Commerce PO Box 734 Carefree, AZ 85377 Phone: (480) 488-3381 [email protected]
Fountain Hills Chamber of Commerce Visitors Bureau P.O. Box 17598 Fountain Hills, Arizona 85269 480-837-1654 [email protected]
GLOBE-MIAMI REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 1360 North Broad Street, Globe AZ 85501 (928) 425-4495 / (800) 804-5623 [email protected] 21
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Mesa Chamber of Commerce 40 N. Center St. Suite 104 Mesa, AZ 85201 P: 480.969.1307 [email protected]
Rim Country Regional Chamber of Commerce John Stanton - Chamber Manager P.O. Box 1380 Payson, AZ 85547 928-474-4515 [email protected]
Greater Phoenix Chamber of Commerce 201 N. Central Ave., 27th Floor Phoenix, AZ 85004 P: (602) 495-2195 F: (602) 495-8913 [email protected]
Greater Phoenix Convention & Visitors Bureau 400 E. Van Buren Street, Suite 600 Phoenix AZ 85004 (877) CALLPHX or (602) 254-6500 [email protected]
Scottsdale Area Chamber of Commerce 7501 E. McCormick Parkway, Suite 202-N Scottsdale, AZ 85258 480-355-2700 [email protected]
Superior Chamber of Commerce PO Box 95 Superior, Arizona 85173 (520) 689-0200 (Waiting to hear back for their email)
Tonto Basin Chamber of Commerce PO Box 687 45675 N. Hwy 188 Tonto Basin, AZ 85553-0687 Phone: (928) 479-2839 (Waiting to hear back for their email)
22
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Cell Media Name Title Phone Phone Fax Address County Email Website
TELEVISION 602-207- KTVK (Channel 3) 3443 602-207- 5555 N. Seventh Avenue Phoenix,
Independent Newsroom 3477 AZ 85013 [email protected] http://www.azfamily.com/
Online News KTVK (Channel 3) and Operations 602-207- 5555 N. Seventh Avenue Phoenix, Independent Tina Tran Manager 3761 AZ 85013 KTVK (Channel 3) Assignment 602-207- 602 -207- 5555 N. Seventh Avenue Phoenix, [email protected]
Independent John Warren Desk Manager 3252 Direct 3477 AZ 85013 m 602-650- KPHO (Channel 5) 0711 602-650- 4016 N. Black Canyon Hwy.
CBS Newsroom 0761 Phoenix, AZ 85017 [email protected] http://www.kpho.com/index.html 602-262- KSAZ (Channel 10) 5109 602-262- 511 W. Adams St. Phoenix, AZ
FOX Newsroom 0181 85003 [email protected] http://www.myfoxphoenix.com/ KSAZ (Channel 10) Jonathon Managing 511 W. Adams St. Phoenix, AZ FOX Roy Editor 85003 602-257- KPNX (Channel 12) 6630 602-257- 1101 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ [email protected]
NBC Newsroom 6619 85004 m http://www.azcentral.com/12news/ KPNX (Channel 12) 602-257- 602-257- 1101 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ
NBC Mark Casey News Director 6627 Direct 1212 85004 [email protected] KPNX (Channel 12) Rebecca Managing 1101 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ NBC Millman Editor 85004 KPNX (Channel 12) 1101 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ
NBC Andy Harvey Reporter 85004 [email protected] 602-685- KNXV (Channel 15) 6351 602-685- [email protected]
ABC Newsroom 6363 515 N. 44th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 om http://www.abc15.com/default.aspx KNXV (Channel 15) Andy Managing 602-685- 602-685-
ABC Ramirez Editor 6384 Direct 6363 515 N. 44th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 [email protected] KNXV (Channel 15) 602-803- ABC Brian Webb Reporter 2537 515 N. 44th St. Phoenix, AZ 85008 [email protected] KAZ (AZ-TV) 602-224- 602 -224- 4343 E. Camelback Rd. #130
23
Appendix C – Attachment 1 2230 2214 Phoenix, AZ 85018 Cronkite Newswatch Newsroom Phoenix [email protected] Chandler Channel 480-782- [email protected]
11 Bob Leister 2194 Chandler v Cox 623-322-
Communications Kevin Moran 7918 Phoenix [email protected] 480-965-
KAET - Channel 8 1000 [email protected] KAET - Channel 8 - Mike
Horizon Show Sauceda [email protected] 623-937-
KGLN TV 4984 Glendale [email protected] 480-644-
Mesa Channel 11 3850 Mesa [email protected] Eric 623-773-
Peoria Channel 11 Rodriquez 7944 Peoria [email protected] Phoenix Channel Tray 602-534- [email protected]
11 Goodman 9790 Phoenix v 480-350-
Tempe Channel 11 Skip Neeley 8886 Tempe [email protected]
RADIO [email protected] KTAR (92.3 FM for news; 620 AM for 602-234- 602-265- 5300 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ sports) Newsroom 6316 9941 85012-1410 http://www.620ktar.com/ KTAR (92.3 FM for 602 - news; 620 AM for 602-263- 300- 5300 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ sports) Jim Cross Reporter 5557 5740 85012-1410 [email protected] KTAR (92.3 FM for news; 620 AM for Morning News 602-263- 5300 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ sports) Steve Soliz Editor 5556 85012-1410 KTAR (92.3 FM for 602 - news; 620 AM for Reporter / 738- 5300 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ sports) Jamie West Anchor 5444 85012-1410 [email protected] KTAR (92.3 FM for news; 620 AM for Bob 5300 N. Central Ave. Phoenix, AZ sports) Shomper News Director 85012-1410 KFYI 550 AM (Clear 602 -374- 602 -374- [email protected]
Channel) Newsroom 6120 6037 m
24
Appendix C – Attachment 1 KFYI 550 AM (Clear Melody 602-374- melodybirkett@clearchann
Channel) Birkett News Director 6000 el.com 602- KFYI 550 AM (Clear Christina 377- christinaestes@clearchann Channel) Estes 1406 el.com tedhouston@clearchannel. Ted Houston com gregorypaul@clearchannel Gregory Paul .com bobbennett@clearchannel. Bob Bennett com Nicole nicolefranks@clearchannel Franks .com [email protected] Joe Adams om KGME 910 AM Melody 602 -374- (Clear Channel) Birkett News Director 6000 KNIX 102.5 FM 602-374- (Clear Channel) Becky Lynn 6000
KYOT 95.5 FM 602-374- (Clear Channel) 6000 602-374- KEZ 99.9 FM (Clear 6000 or 602- Channel) Lisa Aguilar Producer 374-6172 Arizona News 480-998- 480-503- Radio Newsroom 2037 8743 [email protected] Arizona News George 480-998-
Radio Tanner News Director 2037 [email protected] 480- Arizona Radio John On Air 602-254- 577- News Network Gilliland Newscaster 6080 7699 Temp. Programming 602-776- 602-285- KOOL 94.5 FM Tom Peake Director 7000 1450 [email protected] KKLT 98.7 FM (The 602-274- Peak) 6200
25
Appendix C – Attachment 1 KFLR (Christian Radio) Family Life 1-800-776- 520-797- Comm. Network Mike Shaw News Director 1070 3375 KBAQ 89.5 FM and KJZZ 91.5 FM (NPR Carl General 480-834- [email protected] affiliates) Matthusen Manager 5627 a.edu
NPR [email protected] Main 602-258- 602-440-
KMLE 108 FM Number 8181 6530 [email protected] Jay Program 602-452-
KMLE 108 FM McCarthy Director 1088 [email protected] Sunsounds (Statewide radio reading service for 480-774- 480-774- [email protected] disabled) Bill Pasco Director 8300 8310 a.edu Andrea.pasquale@riomail.
maricopa.edu
PRINT 480-898- Ahwatukee Doug 7900 / 480- 480-893-
Foothills News Murphy Reporter 898-7914 1684 Ahwatukee [email protected] Anthem / Deer 623-972- 623-974- [email protected]
Valley Independent 6101 6004 Anthem/D.V. m Apache Junction 480-982- 480-982-
News 6397 3707 Apache Junction [email protected] Apache Junction Canyon 480-982- 480-671-
Independent 7799 0016 Apache Junction [email protected] Arizona Capitol 602-258- 602-258- ginger.lamb@azcapitoltim
Times Ginger Lamb President/Editor 7026 2504 Phoenix es.com 602-840- 602-840-
Arcadia News 6379 6592 Phoenix Maricopa [email protected] Arizona City Valley Donovan 520-836- 520-836- dkramerjr@trivalleycentral.
Newspapers Kramer Jr. Main Editor 7461 0343 Arizona City com Karen 928-425- kschnider@tontobasinnew
Arizona Free Press Schnider 8253 s.com 602-257- 602 -257-
Arizona Informant 9300 0547 Phoenix Maricopa www.azinformant.com
26
Appendix C – Attachment 1
602-444- 602-444- newstips@arizonarepublic.
Arizona Republic 6397 8044 Phoenix com http://www.azcentral.com/arizonarepu
602-444- 8000 x3; 2 The Arizona 800-331- maryjo.pitzl@arizonarepub
Republic Newsroom 9303 toll free Phoenix Maricopa lic.com www.azcentral.com East Mesa 480-982- 480-671-
Independent 7799 0016 East Mesa [email protected] 480-315- John 1474, press 480-348- [email protected]
East Mesa Times Dickerson Features Editor 5 for editorial 2109 East Mesa m www.timespublications.com 480-898- 6514 480-898-
East Valley Tribune Newsroom 6362 Mesa [email protected] http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/ 480- 480-898- 242- 480-898-
East Valley Tribune Mike Branom Reporter 6440 3924 6362 Mesa Maricopa www.eastvalleytribune.com 602-418- 602-254- El Monitor Hispano 4994 5753 Phoenix Maricopa Eloy Valley Donovan 520-836- 520-836- dkramerjr@trivalleycentral.
Newspapers Kramer Jr. Main Editor 7461 0343 Eloy com Florence Valley Donovan 520-836- 520-836- dkramerjr@trivalleycentral.
Newspapers Kramer Jr. Main Editor 7461 0343 Florence com Gilbert 480-497- 480-926- Independent 0048 1019 Gilbert 480-315- John 1474, press 480-348- [email protected]
Gilbert Times Dickerson Features Editor 5 for editorial 2109 Gilbert m www.timespublications.com 623-842- Glendale Star / Elizabeth Public Safety 6000 / 623- 623-842-
Peoria Times Jackman Reporter 847-4615 6017 Glendale [email protected] Maryanne 623-977- 623-876-
Glendale Today Leyshon Editor 8351 3698 Glendale [email protected] New Times / 602-271- 602-340- Phoenix New Times Editor 0040 8806 Phoenix Maricopa North Scottsdale 480-348- 480-951- Times, The 0343 8688 Scottsdale Maricopa
27
Appendix C – Attachment 1 480-315- Northeast Phoenix John 1474, press 480-348- [email protected]
Times Dickerson Features Editor 5 for editorial 2109 N.E. Phoenix m www.timespublications.com Queen Creek 480-497- 480-926- Independent 0048 1019 Queen Creek Copper Area News 520-363- 520-363- Publishers 5554 9663 Kearny Pinal 520-385- 520-385- San Manuel Miner 2266 4666 San Manuel Pinal
WIRE Associated Press 602 -258- 602 -254-
Arizona 8934 9573 Phx [email protected] Associated Press 602-714- 602-956- Arizona 0355 1655 [email protected] Associated Press 602-416- Arizona News Editor 5080 602-542- 602-271-
Capitol Media 5078 7018 Phx [email protected] Arizona Native 602 448 Scene 0260 480 610 9480 Mesa 480 850 Au-Authm Action 8000 480 850 8064 Scottsdale Manataba 602 448 Messenger 5483 602 200 9053 Scottsdale 602 265 Native Peoples 4855 602 265 3113 Phoenix National Reuters News Correspondent, 602-374- Service Tom Gaynor Phoenix 8164
28
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Media Contacts Gila County Media Contacts 2010
Media Name Title Phone Fax City E-mail Website
Miami, AZ /
RADIO KQSS 98.3 Bill Taylor Owner 928-425-7186 928-425-7982 Globe [email protected] http://gila1019.com/home Arizona Silver Belt / Apache Moccasin
PRINT Marc Marin Publisher 928-425-7121 928-425-7001 Globe [email protected] http://www.silverbelt.com
PRINT Copper Country News Rita Hassard Editor 928-425-0355 928-425-6535 Globe [email protected] Eastern Arizona Courier / The Copper Managing 928-865-3162
PRINT Era Walter Mares Editor 602-525-3683 Clifton [email protected] www.eacourier.com Managing
PRINT Globe Newspapers John Bennett Editor 928-425 7121 928-425-7001 Globe [email protected] www.silverbelt.com Just for You Tonto PRINT Publication Gail Starkey Publisher 928-479-3022 Basin [email protected] weekly Autumn 928-474-5251
PRINT Payson Roundup Phillips Editor x115 928-474-1893 Payson [email protected] www.paysonroundup.com
PRINT/BLOG Rim Country Gazette Jim Keyworth Editor 928-474-8787 [email protected] http://www.rimcountrygazette.blogspot.com The Eastern Arizona Managing 928-428-2560
PRINT Courier Aimee Staten Editor 928-965-8721 c 928-428-4901 Safford [email protected] www.eacourier.com Rick 928-428-4901 /
Schneider Publisher 928-428-2560 5396 Safford [email protected] www.eacourier.com 520-689- PRINT The Superior Sun 2436 520-363-9663 Superior
29
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Tribal Media
Daily/ Title Phone Fax City Email Website Weekly Tribe 520-562-
Managing Editor 520-562-9718 9172 Sacaton [email protected] www.gilariver.org/news Monthly GRIC 520-562-
Reporter 520-562-9719 9172 Sacaton [email protected] 928-226-9696 928-226-
Publisher ext 6 1115 Flagstaff [email protected] www.navajohopiobserver.com Hopi 928-226-9696 928-226-
Managing Editor ext 5 1115 Flagstaff [email protected] 928-226-
1115 [email protected] 928-871- Editor 928-871-1130 1159 Window Rock Thursdays Navajo
928-425-
Publisher 928-425-7121 7001 Globe [email protected] www.silverbelt.com Wednesdays San Carlos Apache 928-425-
Staff Writer 928-425-7121 7001 [email protected] www.silverbelt.com Wednesdays San Carlos Apache 928-425-
Photographer 928-425-7121 7001 [email protected] www.silverbelt.com Wednesdays San Carlos Apache 928-537- White Mountain
928-537-5721 1780 [email protected] www.wmicentral.com Apache White Mountain
[email protected] Apache White Mountain
[email protected] Apache
White Mountain
928-338-5211 www.wmat.nsn.us Apache
Opinion page editor (315) 829-8355 Canastota http://www.indiancountrytoday.com/national
Managing editor 315) 829-8343 [email protected]
Staff writer [email protected]
Staff writer [email protected]
30
Appendix C – Attachment 1
Special Interest:
a. Motorized Trail Rider Groups Tonto Recreation Alliance (TRAL) Copper State OHV Motor Sports Association Great Western Trail National Off-Highway Vehicle Conservation Council-(NOHVCC)
b. Stock Organizations Central Arizona Backcountry Horsemen Arizona State Horseman Association Arizona Cattle Growers Association
c. Conservation Preservation Groups Arizona Trail Association Central Arizona Backcountry Horsemen Arizona State Horseman Association Arizona Cattle Growers Association Sierra Club Center for Biological Diversity Volunteers for Outdoor Arizona Superstition Area Land Trust American Hiking Society Wilderness Society Yavapai Trails Friends of the Tonto
d. Local Businesses including Off-road vehicle manufacturing and distribution outlets Dave Albo Compiling list
e. Private Campground businesses Dave Albo Compiling list
f. Nature, Wildlife Groups Arizona Elk Society Arizona Mule Deer Association National Wild Turkey Federation
31
Appendix C – Attachment 2
U.S. Forest Service Offers New Digital Maps for Mobile Devices
WASHINGTON, Nov. 20, 2013 - The U.S. Forest Service now offers access to variety of visitor maps for people using Android and iOS devices.
"This mobile app makes it easier than ever to plan your visit to a national forest or grassland," said U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell. "By putting important forest information right at your fingertips, it will encourage more Americans to get outside and explore their forests."
The digital maps are part of USDA's work toward reaching President Obama's initiative to create a paperless government that also provides the American public with better, more accessible information. Online customer surveys also indicated a desire for more online products and information, such as maps. The Forest Service is currently working on the first phase of a website redesign, expected to debut early in 2014, which centers on a map-based tool for planning trips onto our nation's forests, grasslands and other special places.
The PDF Maps Mobile App, developed by Avenza Systems Inc., is available as a free download from iTunes and the Android Play Store. The app provides access to Forest Service maps, such as motor- vehicle-use maps, which are free while pages from national forest atlases are 99 cents and forest visitor maps are $4.99. Prices are pending for other agency maps.
The maps are geo-referenced with the user's location appearing as a blue dot. The app works on iPhones (3GS or newer) and iPads with WiFi+3G. It also works with Android 4 or newer operating systems on devices with at least 1 gigabyte of memory.
Through the app, users can purchase and download professionally created maps that are stored on their devices. They can use the maps based on their location when GPS is available. The maps also will allow users to measure distance and area, find coordinates, open a current view in Google maps, plot place marks, add notes, enter their own data and add photos as attributes. Almost 700 Forest Service maps are available through the app.
In areas of national forests and grasslands where Internet connections are unavailable, the app and static maps work well if users download the maps prior to their visit. The apps and maps also will be useful for wildland firefighters.
In geographic areas with internet availability users will be able to use the products with live data. The interactive map is expected to be available on a limited basis starting in March 2014. The Forest Service's seven regions are tasked with uploading maps. Users should contact the regional office where a forest or grassland is located if maps are not available on the app.
Paper maps are still available for purchase online at the National Forest Store
The Forest Service differs from other federal government agencies in how the Forest Visitor map is funded. The Agriculture Adjustment Act of 1938 calls for the sale of maps as the funding mechanism to revise and produce maps for the public. In 1999 the Act was amended to include products available through the web as "geo-referenced data."
The mission of the U.S. Forest Service, an agency of the U.S. Department of Agriculture, is to sustain the health, diversity and productivity of the nation's forests and grasslands to meet the needs of present Appendix C – Attachment 2
and future generations. The agency manages 193 million acres of public land, provides assistance to state and private landowners, and maintains the largest forestry research organization in the world. Public lands the Forest Service manages contribute more than $13 billion to the economy each year through visitor spending alone. Those same lands provide 20 percent of the nation's clean water supply, a value estimated at $7.2 billion per year. The agency has either a direct or indirect role in stewardship of about 80 percent of the 850 million forested acres within the U.S., of which 100 million acres are urban forests where most Americans live.
USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, Office of the Assistant Secretary for Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Stop 9410, Washington, DC 20250-9410, or call toll-free at (866) 632- 9992 (English) or (800) 877-8339 (TDD) or (866) 377-8642 (English Federal-relay) or (800) 845-6136 (Spanish Federal-relay).
Pasted from
Avenza website available at http://www.avenza.com
Digital Maps to Aid Forest Access by DAVE MARTINEZ , Herald and News, November 22, 2013
Digital maps from across the United States Forest Service are now being offered on iOS and Android mobile devices.
“The digital maps are part of USDA’s work toward reaching President Obama’s initiative to create a paperless government that also provides the American public with better, more accessible information,” a press release from the agency said.
“This mobile app makes it easier than ever to plan your visit to a national forest or grassland,” U.S. Forest Service Chief Tom Tidwell said in the release.
The maps provide current GPS locations, allow measurements, plot place marks, add notes and add photos and data. Nearly 700 Forest Service maps are available through the app.
Users can download the PDF Maps Mobile App by Avenza Systems Inc. for free and purchase Forest Service maps via the app. The maps range in price from free to $4.99. The app can be found in the iTunes or Google Play stores.
Pasted from See http://www.fs.usda.gov/detail/coconino/landmanagement/projects/?cid=stelprdb5356224 for Coconino National Forest website that features applications for computers and laptops, smartphones and Garmin GPS to download the Coconino National Forest MVUM to personal devices. Contact for Travel Management Implementation Coconino National Forest: Mike Dechter 928-527-3416. Appendix C – Attachment 2 Digital Ranger Program on the Dixie National Forest For those who are interested in obtaining additional information regarding the Dixie’s digital ranger application program, and what the program can provide, I have given you a tiny bit of the program but Deb Wilkin’s has been much more involved. http://www.digital-ranger.com/ http://www.digital-ranger.com The program has several aspects that would appeal to a variety of folks. First and foremost it will download the base maps of the Dixie NF along with the roads and trails. These are our maps not those from a national database. One program allows you to track your progress and position via satellite along any of the trails or roads. Many but not all trails are identified to show beginning and endpoints so a hiker can see not only the distance they have traveled but also the terrain elevations that are associated with the hike. Another feature allows a user to look at a database of local flowers and plants that they can read about to help them in identifying the fauna nearby. Campground and trailheads are also marked. A newer feature allows a hunter/ hiker/ camper to mark a waypoint. If you are out in the forest and find that perfect Christmas tree, spring head, hunt site or private camping site and want to mark it for future use you can do so. It will be saved on your phone or tablet for future use and can be deleted when you no longer need it. They wanted me to convey that they are trying to keep the information on the App “light” so a user would not have to download huge amounts of Data. This special FREE DOWNLOAD is available through the end of this week Dec. 6. Free downloads are available for all the local areas that they have developed Digital Ranger including Fishlake NF, Bryce Canyon NP, Zion NP, Grand Canyon NP. You can access the download by following the directions above in the link or stop by the front desk to scan the card for access. Please remember the app is free for Apple devices but will cost Android users. (I believe it is $.99) After the first week in December it will not be free. I cannot tell you much about the program but do know that Deb has given them the Forest’ s support in this endeavor and since the time offer for the free app is limited I felt it best to send to everyone. If you experience any problems you need to send your concerns to Derek Petersen at info@digital- ranger.com. Susan Baughman Minerals Administrator Dixie National Forest 1789 N. Wedgewood Ln. Cedar City, UT 84721 435 865-3703 [email protected] The Dixie completed this work under a partnership. The database of plants and animals was compiled by a University Professor. Appendix C – Attachment 2 • Features • Team • Contact us Never get lost again Digital Ranger tracks your progress along trails in our nation's parks and forests with no cell service required. Detailed Information Digital Ranger offers elevation profiles as well as detailed progress along trails. Appendix C – Attachment 2 Huge catalog of plants and wildlife Digital Ranger features high-quality photographs and interesting descriptions of a vast database of plant and wildlife species within the parks and forests. Nearby features and points of interest Digital Ranger keeps you informed of nearby features, amenities and points of interests. Never search for a restroom, water fountain or picnic table again. Appendix C – Attachment 2 ‹ › Track yourself along trails in our National Parks and Forests -- even with no cell service! Appendix C – Attachment 2 Appendix C – Attachment 2 © Copyright 2013 Digital Ranger, LLC Features Appendix C – Attachment 2 HD Trail Maps Sporting proprietary HD topographical and contour maps, Digital Ranger keeps you location-aware throughout your visit. Using the latest official trail data from the National Park Service and National Forest Service, you'll always have accurate information. Around Me The Around Me feature lets you know what's nearby. From wildlife and restrooms to trailheads, Around Me keeps aware of your surroundings. Appendix C – Attachment 2 Plants and Wildlife Digital Ranger features a vast collection of high-resolution plant and wildlife species photographs and information. You can see what species can be found near specific trails. Relevant Information Digital Ranger gives you relevant information such as nearby restrooms, water fountains and trailheads based on your location. Appendix C – Attachment 2 Details Digital Ranger offers detailed information about amenities available at shuttle stops and other points of interests. OHV Trails With up-to-date motor vehicle regulation information, Digital Ranger keeps you informed while enjoying our nation's OHV trails. Appendix C – Attachment 2 Our Team Bruce Business Administrator Using his entrepreneurial experience from previous successful ventures, Bruce manages the business and the team and keeps everything moving smoothly. Ron Biologist A botanist and professor at Southern Utah University, Ron creates the plant, wildlife, and geology content. With over a decade of photographs, he has put together a remarkable collection. Appendix C – Attachment 2 Derek Developer / GIS Specialist Derek developed the iOS app and oversees our development team. His duties have also expanded to include working with GIS data. Andrew Data Specialist Andrew helps manage the vast amounts of data we process in launching the app in a park or forest. From the Blog Appendix C – Attachment 2 Coming Soon We will be launching our blog soon, stay tuned! Aug 7. 2013 Contact Us Name Appendix C – Attachment 3 Coconino – Coconino TM Implementation monitoring findings: biggest concern- MVUM in black and white, little background features making it difficult to navigate and find location of road or trail using only the MVUM. Travel Plan Implementation Contact: Mike Dechter 928-527-3416. Coconino is proposing to produce a supplemental travel map. Motor Vehicle Use Map (MVUM) vs Supplemental Forest Travel Map What is a Supplemental Forest Travel Map? The Forest Travel Map would be a color version of the MVUM with creeks and canyons and other landmarks identified on the map. The Travel Map would include shaded relief as a background and would likely include section lines. The map would also include the main non-motorized hiking trails and trailheads. The map would include a corridor symbol rather than dots to delineate the 300-foot corridors for motorized camping. The map need not be only at the scale of the Coconino NF, but could also include routes on adjacent State and Federal lands, such as interspersed State Trust Lands and the Kaibab National Forest. Yet, the scale of the map does need to be considered given the area being depicted. Forests are required to publish and distribute an MVUM first. Any supplemental maps would be produced following MVUM. For a similar example, see this one from the Sequoia National Forest: http://www.fs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE_DOCUMENTS/stelprdb5405356.pdf 1 Appendix C – Attachment 3 Supplemental Color MVUM map with additional background accomplished through a partnership on the Lewis and Clark National Forest. Now That’s A Motorized Travel Map! by Dave Halsey, NOHVCC Contributing Writer It’s widely accepted that most Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUM) printed by the U.S. Forest Service get two thumbs up for compliance with federal regulations, but two thumbs down for navigation by the public that paid for them. Required by National Forests and Grasslands under the 2005 Travel Management Rule, an MVUM’s sole purpose is “to identify and designate those roads, trails and areas that are open to motor vehicle use.” The black-and-white maps -- 108 of them listed on the Forest Service web site -- are made available to the public free of charge at Ranger District offices. But to the dismay of trail riders, hunters and motorized recreationists everywhere, they show no topography, and often no parking areas, no towns as landmarks and to access services, and no connecting routes where Forest Roads cross state or county property; and most importantly no other features to help with on-the-ground navigation. If you have ever ridden an off-highway vehicle (OHV) in a National Forest with an MVUM in your pocket, you already know all of this. So what’s the upside to this story? The fact is, it is possible for National Forests to partner with OHV clubs and associations to make a better, more driver- and rider-friendly map. Case in point: the Motorized Travel Map for the Little Belt Mountains in Montana. It’s one the best maps in the country for navigating the roads and trails in a National Forest. The map was developed and printed under a cooperative 2 Appendix C – Attachment 3 agreement between the Great Falls Trail Bike Riders Association, the Montana Trail Vehicle Riders Association, Inc., and the Lewis and Clark National Forest. Now in its third edition, it is reprinted when there are major changes to the travel routes. Like an MVUM, the map shows “Roads open to highway legal vehicles,” “Roads open to all vehicles,” and vehicle designations for trails. Unlike an MVUM, the Little Belt map is printed in 4-color and is incredibly user friendly showing trails, roads, vehicle designations and seasonal restrictions much larger and differentiated by color. It also adds trailheads and parking areas, lookouts, campgrounds and picnic areas, fishing access sites, township grids, topography, towns and villages. And it’s packed with helpful information, illustrated with color photography, covering vehicle use, invasive species, camping regulations, sharing trails and trail etiquette, OHV safety and more. Russ Ehnes was the champion of this map project. Executive Director of the National Off-Highway Vehicle Conservation Council (NOHVCC), Ehnes has a wealth of information for OHV clubs and state associations interested in creating a motorized travel map in partnership with their local National Forest. Here are our questions and his answers: Is this the first map created in a partnership like this? Other clubs have created maps with the help of National Forests. This is probably the best example of a true partnership that I’m aware of. They were printed by the OHV organizations with a grant from the state OHV program. The Forest Service provided all the GIS data and cartography, and created the file, which they can do. But as an agency they can’t print a map like this. Why can’t the Forest Service print the map? There are a couple of reasons. One, the agency has strict standards on how a map must look. Some of their standards don’t make for an easy-to-read, understandable map. We deviated from their standards. The other problem is that the agencies, if they are going to print a map, must have it printed through a Government Printing Office (GPO), and that’s excessively expensive. For us, it was a neat partnership. We worked with the Forest to create the file in a format that was easy to understand and interpret. It shows everything you need to know, including non-motorized trails. It shows cartography, with shaded relief. It shows bodies of water and other roads. It’s a great navigation tool. And we printed it for a fraction of the cost to have it printed by the GPO. 3 Appendix C – Attachment 3 What was the cost to print the map? We printed 20,000 of them the first run, on a lightweight paper that’s not particularly durable, but they were 26 cents a map, printed by a local company. We distributed them to every Forest Service district office, the Forest Supervisor’s office, and all the towns surrounding the mountain range. We put them in every OHV store, all the sporting goods stores, and club members handed them out. Why was distribution so important? We had the 2007 Travel Management Decision in place. There was an MVUM printed for that and it was as useless as any other MVUM out there. The District Court overturned the Forest Service Decision and we went back to a mediated or interim Travel Plan. When news of that court decision hit the street, everybody was confused. There was so much misinformation out there, it was critical to get that map out immediately. We started it in the fall of 2009 and had it on the street by May of 2010 when the snow went off the mountains. Did you get good cooperation from the Forest Service? We had incredible cooperation, and it was driven by the Forest Supervisor who was there at the time. To his credit, he saw that in order for there to be any semblance of order and enforceable and manageable information, we had to get a map into the hands of the people. He was pushing his staff and we had a fantastic cartographer to work with. The cartographer at Lewis and Clark was Kelsey McCartney. She’s the GIS specialist. She created that map and is largely the reason it exists. She spent many hours making it what it is. We gave her an award at the NOHVCC Conference in Montana last year for her outstanding work. What’s the best way to get a map project going? 4 Appendix C – Attachment 3 First, you have to have a written agreement with the Forest. It could be a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) to build the map. Ours is done under a challenged cost-share agreement. But you have to have some kind of an agreement. Then, get anybody you can involved. We were lucky because we had a good working relationship with the recreation staff, the District Rangers and the Forest Supervisor. You have to get the Forest involved and show them what’s possible. Use that Little Belt Map as an example. Show them what’s possible and tell them how you’re going to do it. When it comes to making the map, that should be a fairly small group of people to keep it manageable. What about financing the project? We did it with money from the state OHV grant. Because we did it that way, we can’t sell the maps, because it was a public grant, nor did we want to sell them. We wanted as many maps out there as possible. Maps are a good project for grants, because they fall under the education category. RTP (Recreational Trails Program) or state OHV programs and state education grants are a little less challenging, but be aware it can limit your ability to sell it. In Arizona, a group published a map with help from the Forest Service, and sold advertising on the outside of the map. That’s how they raised the money to print the map and then they gave it away. They could have also sold the map for $5. That’s another way to finance it. So it took you less than a year start to finish? Not exactly. It took 3 years for the Forest to agree that we needed a map. The Forest Supervisor made up his mind that we needed this map design, then he convinced his chief engineer that it needed to be done. The current Forest Supervisor absolutely loves the map. Editor’s note: Some OHV clubs and state associations are using the Little Belt Mountain map to encourage other National Forests to work with them to go beyond the MVUM and create a map that is user-friendly and enhances rider and driver experiences. To receive a copy of the Motorized Travel Map for the Little Belt Mountains that you can use to encourage your National Forest to not stop at the MVUM, send an email to [email protected]. And let us know if you are successful! Clipped on 26-September-2013, 08:42:10 AM from http://www.nohvcc.org/Materials/Newsletter/News09-2013#map Contact info - Kelsey McCartney-GIS Specialist Lewis and Clark National Forest – 406-791-7776 5 Appendix D Tonto National Forest Protection and Restoration Strategy and Forest Travel Management Implementation Strategy Sign Plan Purpose The purpose of this strategy and sign plan is to identify work required to manage roads, trails, OVH areas, permit zones, designated dispersed camp sites, and corridors for dispersed camping, big game retrieval, and fuelwood gathering, that are designated for motorized use. These projects will include the following: • Implementing physical changes to the transportation system identified in the travel management decision (including the conversion of system roads to system motorized trail, obliteration of routes and the designation of unauthorized routes to system road or trail. • Completion of sign planning and installation • Updating and maintaining the transportation atlas and associated data bases • Producing and revising the MVUM on an annual basis General Guidance Travel Management Rule road signing, closures, and decommissioning shall be performed utilizing the following references as general guidelines: • Standard Specifications for Construction of Roads and Bridges on Federal Highway Projects, FP-03, U.S. Department of Transportation. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). • Forest Service Supplemental Specifications to FP-03, USDA Forest Service. • Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide, USDA Forest Service, May 2010, Updated November 21, 2011. • Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service, EM 7100-15, Chapters 6 and 6A Travel Management Signing and Design. - • Travel Management Addendum to EM7100-15 Sign Appendix. • FSM7710 – Travel Planning, FSM 7720 Development,, , FSM7730 – Road Operation, FSM7760, FSM 2350 - Trails, FSH 1909.15 National Environmental Policy - FSH 2309.18 – Trail Operations, FSH 7709.55 -Travel Analysis and FSH 7709.15 – Road Operations. • WO Recreation, Heritage, and Volunteer Resources letter to Regional Foresters, Subject Regional Guidance for “Considering Conversion of a National Forest System Road to a National Forest System Trail”. See Attachment 6. • R3 Regional Forester letter to Forest Supervisors, Subject: Signing for Travel Management Rule, dated September 20, 2011. See Attachment 7. • Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices (Current Edition) • Forest Service Standard Specifications for Construction and Maintenance of Trails (EM-7720-103) • Forest Service Technology and Development Centers Publications Search: http://fsweb.sdtdc.wo.fs.fed .us/pubs/search_all.shtml. 1 Road Classifications The Forest Service currently classifies maintenance of National Forest System roads by five maintenance levels. These maintenance levels in accordance with the Tonto National Forest Plan are listed in Attachment 1 of this Appendix and within the glossary of terms within the TM Implementation Strategy. Trail Fundamentals Trail Fundamentals provide an integrated means to consistently record and communicate the intended design and management guidelines for trail design, construction, maintenance, and use. Before completing documentation for Trail Management Objectives (TMO), TRACS, or applying Trail Fundamentals in trail management, it is essential that their intent is clearly understood. Trial Fundamentals are five concepts that are the cornerstones of Forest Service trail management: • Trail Type – a category that reflects the predominant trail surface and general mode of travel accommodated by the trail. The three trail types include: Standard Terra Trail; Snow Trail and Water Trail. The trail system on the Tonto National Forest consists of Standard Terra Trails. • Trail Class – There are five trail classes that prescribe the scale of development for a trail representing its intended design and management standards. See Trail Class Matrix below. • Managed Use – A mode of travel that is actively managed and appropriate on a trail, based on its design and management. • Designed Use- The Managed Use of a trail that requires the most demanding design, construction, and maintenance parameters and that, in conjunction with the applicable Trail Class determines which Design Parameters will apply to a trail. • Design Parameters- Technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of a trail, based on its Designed Use and Trail Class. FSM 2253.13 directs each National Forest to identify the five trail Fundamentals for each NFS system trail or trail segment based on applicable land management plan direction, travel management decisions, trail specific decisions, and other related direction. See Attachment 2 of this Appendix for Trail Class Matrices and Design Parameters for Hiker/Pedestrian, Pack and Saddle, Motorcycle, All Terrain Vehicle, and 4 Wheel Drive >50 inches. Additional specifics regarding trail fundamental can be found at: http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ibsc/cost.shtml. Trail Management Objectives Trail Management Objectives (TMOs) are fundamental building blocks for trail management. TMOs tier from and reflect forest plan, travel management and/or trail-specific management direction. TMOs synthesize and document, in one convenient place, the management intention for the trail, and provide basic reference information for subsequent trail planning, management, condition surveys, and reporting. See Attachment 3 of this Appendix for description of TMO development, form instructions and examples. Road and Trail Maintenance Road maintenance schedules are developed and road condition surveys completed for selected roads in the fs road system on an annual basis. Trail condition surveys for selected trails are completed on an annual basis. See Attachment 4 for Trail Operation/Maintenance Considerations and National Quality Standards for Trails. 2 Motor Vehicle Use Map Motor Vehicle Use Maps (MVUMs) are mandatory for all FS units and shall display all motor vehicle use designations. The MVUM is a combination of ATM Infra data and GIS spatial data and cartographic efforts. The forest must produce printed maps as well as a digital MVUM that is posted on the forests external website. The initial MVUM will be produced utilizing the instructions on producing and maintain MVUMs contained within the MVUM Production Guide found at: http://fseb.mvum.fs.fed.us/step-3.php. Preparation and Review Process for Travel Management Motor Vehicle Use Map is contained within Appendix A Region 3 Travel Management Implementation Strategy, Attachment 3. This document contains additional R-3 standards not included in the MVUM Production Guide. Two individuals from Engineering will participate on the TMR Implementation Strategy Team which will annually provide input to the Evaluation Monitoring Report. The Evaluation and Monitoring Action Plan identifies and assigns responsibility for resolution of internal and external issues that are encountered during the TMR implementation process. One of the primary goals of the Action items identified is to ensure there is consistency between the roads and trails databases (GIS and I-Web), the Motor Vehicle Use Map, and features that physically exist on the ground (roads, trails, signs, etc.). Engineering will evaluate and monitor the designated road system in order to identify changes needed to the MVUM. Changes to the roads and trails database and MVUM will be facilitated through the engineering roads and trails data stewards and provided to the Travel Planning GIS Specialist. These changes/edits made to the Transportation Atlas (tabular and spatial data, including ATM Module) as projects are implemented, barriers are installed, routes are decommissioned and other transportation data will be incorporated into the annual update of the MVUM. This data is critical to producing accurate MVUM revisions. See Appendix C Education Action Plan with information regarding Interactive MVUM maps and the production of Supplemental travel maps to compliment MVUM. In addition to MVUM information, these Supplemental maps could be produced in color and include trailheads and parking areas, lookouts, campgrounds and picnic areas, fishing access sites, township grids, topography, towns and villages. Additional helpful information, illustrated with color photography, covering vehicle use, invasive species, camping regulations, sharing trails and trail etiquette, OHV safety and more could be included. There could be opportunities to produce these maps in partnership with grant funding. These could be forest wide maps or maps specific to permit zones. Routes Designated for Administrative Use Only Administrative Use only routes means that motorized access is restricted, often with a locked gate, to Forest Service personnel or those that hold an authorized use permit to access the road or trail. These routes will not be displayed on the MVUM. Motorized users not authorized to be on these routes would be cited for being in violation of the Travel Management Rule (TMR). Roads and trails designated for administrative use only will be tracked in Infra and the Access Travel Module ATM data base. The Forest may choose to create a navigational tool that displays administrative roads and trails (for internal use only). 3 Conversion of System Road to System Motorized Trail Through the TM decision approximately 2151 miles (x number of distinct road segments) of NFS System Roads have been identified to convert to NFS System Trail. See Attachment 5 for considerations when converting unneeded NFS roads to NFS trails or identifying coincidental NFS roads and NFS trails. Attachment 3 of this Appendix contains overview instructions for Trail Management Objectives (TMOs). Each route proposed for conversion to system trail will be evaluated regarding the following to identify work needed to convert the road to trail: • Develop and/or revise Trail fundamentals including trail-specific design parameters to accommodate the managed uses and the designed use for the trail. • Consider minor and major re-alignment, reduction of tread and clearing widths of road segments as needed to provide the desired trail experience. • Review and assess both existing and needed route structures including drainage and crossing structures. • Review and access the existing signs and make appropriate adjustments before the route is managed as a trail. Conversion of Unauthorized Routes to a System Road or System Motorized Trail An unauthorized route is defined as an existing road or trail that is not an NFS System road or trail or temporary road or trail that is not included in the transportation atlas. Through the TM decision approximately 10 miles of unauthorized routes are proposed to be designated as road and approximately 280 miles of unauthorized routes are proposed to be designated as motorized trail. These routes were identified as needed to provide long-term access to the forest. These routes will need to be edited or added in I-Web and Road or Trail Management Objectives developed. Trail Fundamentals will need to be identified for the routes converted to system trail. Road and Trail routes with reconstruction needs to accommodate the designated use will need to be identified. Update with final TM decision figures. Uninventoried/Unauthorized/Unclassified Routes Uninventoried/Unauthorized/unclassified routes will be blocked, obliterated, ripped, and/or restored as needed in accordance with FS specifications. Signs will be removed from any routes not open under the new Plan or placement of stickers showing route not open to motorized vehicle traffic. Decommissioning Routes Potential routes identified and prioritized for decommissioning will be monitored. If they are not necessary for administrative use, permitted uses or conversion to trails, they will be analyzed in project level NEPA. Decommissioned routes are proposed to be implemented within a year and within two years of the decision. Routes selected and cleared for decommissioning will be blocked, obliterated, ripped and/or restored as needed in accordance with FS specifications. Decommissioning of routes is a component of the Four Forest Restoration Initiative (4FRI), a collaborative effort to restore forest ecosystems on portions of the Apache Sitgreaves, Coconino, Kaibab and Tonto National Forests. When a decision is made for the Tonto National Forest for 4FRI implementation this work will be coordinated with the TM Implementation Strategy Team. 4 TM Route Designation Change Protocol The following protocol will be implemented to track changes to TM route designations: • Districts will meet with Engineering to identify potential routes that could be decommissioned over time. This applies primarily to roads closed in the TM Decision (those not designated for motorized travel). Other roads could be considered as well. Identified routes will be delineated on a map to be consulted as site specific projects are analyzed in the NEPA process. • When prioritizing route decommissioning projects, the highest priority will be placed on routes with the greatest potential for negative impact on natural resources. Priority will also be places on projects that will result in improved compliance with the MVUM by eliminating access to duplicative routes or other unneeded or unauthorized routes. • Potential routes identified for obliteration will be monitored. If they are not necessary for administrative use, permitted uses or conversion to trails, they will be analyzed in project level NEPA. • When a site specific project decision is made, implementation of obliteration activities can move forward. The Interdisciplinary Team leader (IDT lead) for each site specific project is responsible for transferring the GIS road obliteration coverage to the Forest GIS Coordinator and the TM Implementation Strategy Team Leader. • Changes in the MVUM proposed each year will receive District and Forest review. This will give another opportunity to track site specific project decisions about routes. • Routes being considered for obliteration that cross forest boundaries will receive input from the adjacent Forests during the NEPA analysis. 5 Sign Plan The TM Implementation Strategy sign plan provides guidance in order to primarily accomplish the following: (1) provide the physical infrastructure for the forest road system under TM (2) inform the public of TMR compliance requirements, (2) aid in orientation on the ground, (3) satisfy magistrate’s requirements for MVUM enforcement, (4) address safety issues, (5) consider consistency with surrounding Forests and (6) support the travel management education program. Signing for travel management will be in accordance with policy and guidelines as identified in the current edition of EM-7100-15, Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service (Guidelines). Priority will be given to ensuring that all designated motor vehicle routes identified on the MVUM have route markers and that those markers correspond with the current MVUM. Route markers on routes not shown on the MVUM, signing to support the travel management education program, and additional signing such as portal signs or other supplemental travel management signs identified in the Guidelines will be installed as resources and needs allow. Forest Boundary / Portal Signing Portal Signage should be installed at all maintenance level 2 and 3 road access points to the Forest. Portal signs are installed to inform the public that they are entering an area where motorized travel is restricted and only roads indicated on the motor vehicle use map shall be used. Portal signage cost estimates are located in Engineering Implementation Schedule. Special Signage Additional signage may be necessary given special circumstances and at areas that have frequent TM compliance issues. Public Information Signage Informational signing will be provided at locations identified as primary access points for forest use. Districts will provide a list of priorities for signing. Sign purchasing and installations will depend upon funding availability and implementation will be phased. A one, two, or three-panel kiosk (dependent upon ROS class) will be placed in key locations identified by the Districts to provide more in depth information about motorized travel restrictions. A few existing kiosks will be customized to include the motorized travel information. Figure 1 shows an example of a 1-panel kiosk located on the forest. The Forest Landscape Architect will review Tonto’s current designs for Kiosks and update if needed. A review Santa Fe’s ROS guidelines for Travel Management Implementation Kiosk and Site Development Design will be completed. O:/NFS/Santa Fe/Program/Travel MgmtImplementation/Implementation Tool Kit Engineering. Information provided on the kiosks will include the Motorized Vehicle Use Map (MVUM), “Leave No Trace” message, TREAD Lightly, Travel Management Rule requirements and local destinations, “You Are Here” locations, where to obtain an MVUM, location and availability to download the MVUM, forest and fire information. 6 Figure 1: One Panel kiosk example to be used for motorized travel information. Sign Installation and Tracking Methodology After the decision is made, as signs are installed, field data will be collected (i.e., of intersections visited and signs installed) and tracked so that progress of the signing accomplishment can be quantified and sign implementation schedule updated. In addition, the Roads Data Steward will check inconsistencies between field data and databases and will detect and initiate the correction of any errors in the I-Web (INFRA) and GIS databases. Physical Route Management Routes will be physically managed based on their classification. I-Web (INFRA), GIS, and ATM databases will continuously be updated to reflect the current physical status of all routes. Any physical changes made to routes or signage in the field must be reported to engineering to ensure that database accuracy is maintained. Routes Shown on the MVUM Routes that are designated open on the Motor Vehicle Use Map will be signed with the appropriate route markers as indicated in EM-7100-15, Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service (Guidelines). In addition, portal signage should be installed on all open routes that provide access to the forest also described in EM-7100-15. 1st priority will be given to ensuring that designated routes are properly signed, 2nd priority will be given to installing portal signage. Routes designated for motor vehicle use will be maintained and managed as funding allows through the use of condition surveys and the implementation of annual road maintenance plans. 7 Appendix D - Attachment 1 Glossary of Road Classifications • Maintenance Level 1 Roads: These are roads that have been placed in storage between intermittent uses. The period of storage must exceed 1 year. Basic custodial maintenance is performed to prevent damage to adjacent resources and to perpetuate the road for future resource management needs. Emphasis is normally given to maintaining drainage facilities and runoff patterns. Planned road deterioration may occur at this level. Appropriate traffic management strategies are "prohibit" and "eliminate" all traffic. These roads are not shown on motor vehicle use maps. Roads receiving level 1 maintenance may be of any type, class, or construction standard, and may be managed at any other maintenance level during the time they are open for traffic. However, while being maintained at level 1, they are closed to vehicular traffic but may be available and suitable for non-motorized uses. These roads may be used by vehicles under a special use authorization if this use is specifically specified in the permit. • Maintenance Level 2 Roads: Assigned to roads open for use by high clearance vehicles. Passenger car traffic, user comfort, and user convenience are not considerations. Warning signs and traffic control devices are not provided with the exception that some signing, such as W-18-1 “No Traffic Signs,” may be posted at intersections. Motorists should have no expectations of being alerted to potential hazards while driving these roads. Traffic is normally minor, usually consisting of one or a combination of administrative, permitted, dispersed recreation, or other specialized uses. Log haul may occur at this level. Appropriate traffic management strategies are either to: a. Discourage or prohibit passenger cars, or b. Accept or discourage high clearance vehicles. • Maintenance Level 3 Roads: Assigned to roads open and maintained for travel by a prudent driver in a standard passenger car. User comfort and convenience are not considered priorities. The Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) is applicable. Warning signs and traffic control devices are provided to alert motorists of situations that may violate expectations. Roads in this maintenance level are typically low speed with single lanes and turnouts. Appropriate traffic management strategies are either "encourage" or "accept." "Discourage" or "prohibit" strategies may be employed for certain classes of vehicles or users. • Maintenance Level 4 Roads: Assigned to roads that provide a moderate degree of user comfort and convenience at moderate travel speeds. Most roads are double lane and aggregate surfaced. However, some roads may be single lane. Some roads may be paved and/or dust abated. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices is applicable. The most appropriate traffic management strategy is "encourage." However, the "prohibit" strategy may apply to specific classes of vehicles or users at certain times. • Maintenance Level 5 Roads: Assigned to roads that provide a high degree of user comfort and convenience. These roads are normally double lane, paved facilities. Some may be aggregate surfaced and dust abated. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices is applicable. The appropriate traffic management strategy is "encourage." 1 Appendix D - Attachment 1 • Road Decommission: The denial of use, elimination of travelway functionality, and removal of the road from the forest development road system; results in the stabilization and restoration of unneeded roads to a more natural state and return of the road corridor to resource production by natural or designed means. • Unauthorized/Unclassified Road: Roads on National Forest System lands that have been developed over time by users outside the forest planning process and are not managed as part of the forest transportation system, such as unplanned roads, abandoned travelways, and off-road vehicle tracks that have not been designated and managed as a trail; and those roads that were once under permit or other authorization and were not decommissioned upon the termination of the authorization. These roads do not meet technical standards or environmental protection standards and may present an environmental threat and a potential safety threat to users. 2 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Trail Class Matrix Trail Classes are general categories reflecting trail development scale, arranged along a continuum. The Trail Class identified for a National Forest System (NFS) trail prescribes its development scale, representing its intended design and management standards.1 Local deviations from any Trail Class descriptor may be established based on trail-specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations do not undermine the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. Identify the appropriate Trail Class for each National Forest System trail or trail segment based on the management intent in the applicable land management plan, travel management direction, trail-specific decisions, and other related direction. Apply the Trail Class that most closely matches the management intent for the trail or trail segment, which may or may not reflect the current condition of the trail. Trail Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Attributes Minimally Developed Moderately Developed Developed Highly Developed Fully Developed Tread -Tread intermittent and often -Tread continuous and -Tread continuous and -Tread wide and relatively smooth -Tread wide, firm, stable, & Traffic Flow indistinct discernible, but narrow and obvious with few irregularities and generally uniform -May require route finding rough -Single lane, with allowances -Single lane, with allowances -Single lane, with frequent -Single lane with no -Single lane with minor constructed for passing where constructed for passing where turnouts where traffic allowances constructed for allowances constructed for required by traffic volumes in required by traffic volumes in volumes are low to moderate passing passing areas with no reasonable areas with no reasonable passing -Double lane where traffic -Predominantly native -Typically native materials passing opportunities available opportunities available volumes are moderate to materials -Native or imported materials -Double lane where traffic high volumes are high and passing -Commonly hardened with is frequent asphalt or other imported -Native or imported materials material -May be hardened Obstacles -Obstacles common, naturally -Obstacles may be common, -Obstacles may be common, but -Obstacles infrequent and -Obstacles not present occurring, often substantial and substantial, and intended to not substantial or intended to insubstantial -Grades typically < 8% intended to provide increased provide increased challenge provide challenge -Vegetation cleared outside of challenge -Blockages cleared to define -Vegetation cleared outside of trailway -Narrow passages; brush, steep route and protect resources trailway grades, rocks and logs present -Vegetation may encroach into trailway 10/16/2008 1 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Trail Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Attributes Minimally Developed Moderately Developed Developed Highly Developed Fully Developed Constructed -Structures minimal to non- -Structures of limited size, scale, -Structures may be common and -Structures frequent and -Structures frequent or Features existent and quantity; typically substantial; constructed of substantial; typically continuous; typically & Trail -Drainage typically constructed of native materials imported or native materials constructed of imported constructed of imported materials materials Elements accomplished without -Structures adequate to -Natural or constructed fords structures protect trail infrastructure and -Bridges as needed for -Constructed or natural fords -May include bridges, -Natural fords resources resource protection and -Bridges as needed for resource boardwalks, curbs, handrails, trailside amenities, and - -Natural fords appropriate access protection and user convenience Typically no bridges similar features -Bridges as needed for -Trailside amenities may be resource protection and present appropriate access 2 Signs -Route identification signing -Route identification signing -Route identification signing at -Route identification signing at -Route identification signing at limited to junctions limited to junctions junctions and as needed for junctions and as needed for user junctions and for user -Route markers present when -Route markers present when user reassurance reassurance reassurance trail location is not evident trail location is not evident -Route markers as needed -Route markers as needed for -Route markers as needed for -Regulatory and resource -Regulatory and resource for user reassurance user reassurance user reassurance protection signing infrequent protection signing infrequent -Regulatory and resource -Regulatory and resource -Regulatory and resource -Designation signing, unless -Destination signing typically protection signing may be protection signing common protection signing common required, generally not present infrequent outside of wilderness; common -Destination signing common -Destination signing common - -Information and interpretive generally not present in Destination signing likely outside of wilderness; generally -Information and interpretive signing generally not present wilderness outside of wilderness; not present in wilderness signs common -Information and interpretive generally not present in -Information and interpretive wilderness -Accessibility information likely signing not common signs may be common outside displayed at trailhead -Information and interpretive of wilderness signs may be present outside -Accessibility information likely of wilderness displayed at trailhead Typical -Natural, unmodified -Natural, essentially -Natural, primarily -May be modified -May be highly modified Recreation -ROS: Typically Primitive to unmodified unmodified -ROS: Typically Semi- -Commonly associated with -ROS: Typically Roaded Natural -ROS: Typically Primitive to Primitive to Rural Roaded visitor centers or high-use Environs Primitive to Roaded 3 Roaded Natural Typically Natural to Rural setting recreation sites & Experience -WROS: Typically Primitive to Natural Semi-Primitive -WROS: Typically Primitive to -WROS: Typically Portal or -ROS: Typically Roaded -WROS: Typically Semi- Semi-Primitive Transition Natural to Urban Primitive to Transition -Generally not present in Wilderness 1 For National Quality Standards for Trails, Potential Appropriateness of Trail Classes for Managed Uses, Design Parameters, and other related guidance, refer to FSM 2353, FSH 2309.18, and other applicable agency references. 2 For standards and guidelines for the use of signs and posters along trails, refer to the Sign and Poster Guidelines for the Forest Service (EM-7100-15). 3 The Trail Class Matrix shows the combinations of Trail Class and Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) or Wilderness Recreation Opportunity Spectrum (WROS) settings that commonly occur, although trails in all Trail Classes may and do occur in all settings. For guidance on the application of the ROS and WROS, refer to FSM 2310 and 2353 and FSH 2309.18. 2 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Per FSH 2309.18 section 06 Design Parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of a trail, based on its Designed Use and Trail Class. 1. Design Parameters reflect the design objectives for NFS trails and determine the dominant physical criteria that most define their geometric shape. These criteria include: a. Design Tread Width. Design Tread Width is expressed in terms of single lane, double lane, and the minimum tread width on trail structures. b. Design Surface. Design Surface is expressed in terms of surface type, protrusions, and obstacles. c. Design Grade. Design Grade is expressed in terms of Target Grade, Short Pitch Maximum Grade, and Maximum Pitch Density. d. Design Cross Slope. Design Cross Slope is expressed in terms of Target Cross Slope and Maximum Cross Slope. e. Design Clearing. Design Clearing is expressed in terms of width, height, and shoulder clearance. f. Design Turns. Design Turns are expressed in terms of the turning radius. 2. Local deviations from any Design Parameter may be established based on trail specific conditions, topography, or other factors (for example, mitigation of site-specific safety concerns and adjustments to accommodate other Managed Uses), provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. 3. Identify the Design Parameters for a NFS trail or trail segment based on its Trail Class and Designed Use. For a Design Parameter such as Design Tread Width, Design Clearing Width, and Design Turns that is expressed as a range of values, identify a specific value for each trail or trail segment. For the complete set of Design Parameters, refer to section 23.11, exhibit 01, through section 23.33, exhibit 01, of FSH 2309.18 section 06. 3 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Design Parameters Design Parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their Designed Use and Trail Class and consistent with their management intent1. Local deviations from any Design Parameter may be established based on trail- specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. Designed Use HIKER/PEDESTRIAN Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 2 Trail Class 4 2 Trail Class 5 2 Design Wilderness 0” – 12” 6” – 18” 12” – 24” 18” – 24” Not applicable Tread (Single Lane) Exception: may be Exception: may be 36” – 48” at steep side 36” – 48” at steep side Width slopes slopes Non-Wilderness 0” – 12” 6” – 18” 18” – 36” 24” – 60” 36” – 72” (Single Lane) Non-Wilderness 36” 36” 36” – 60” 48” – 72” 72” – 120” (Double Lane) Structures 18” 18” 18” 36” 36” (Minimum Width) Design Type Native, ungraded Native, limited grading Native with some onsite Native with improved Likely imported material, 3 borrow or imported sections of borrow or routine grading Surface May be continuously May be continuously material where needed imported material, rough rough for stabilization, routine grading Uniform, firm, and stable occasional grading Minor roughness Intermittently rough Protrusions ≤ 24” ≤ 6” ≤ 3” ≤ 3 ” No protrusions Likely common and May be common and May be common, not Uncommon, not continuous continuous continuous continuous Obstacles 24” 14” 10” 8” No obstacles (Maximum Height) Design Target Grade 5% – 25% 5% – 18% 3% – 12% 2% – 10% 2% – 5% Grade 3 Short Pitch Maximum 40% 35% 25% 15% 5% FSTAG: 5% – 12%2 Maximum Pitch Density 20% – 40% of trail 20% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 5% – 20% of trail 0% – 5% of trail 10/16/2008 4 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Designed Use HIKER/PEDESTRIAN Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 2 Trail Class 4 2 Trail Class 5 2 Design Target Cross Slope Natural side slope 5% – 20% 5% – 10% 3% – 7% 2% – 3% (or crowned) Cross Slope Maximum Cross Slope Natural side slope 25% 15% 10% 3% Design Height 6’ 6’ – 7’ 7’ – 8’ 8’ – 10’ 8’ – 10’ Clearing Width ≥ 24” 24” – 48” 36” – 60” 48” – 72” 60” – 72” Some vegetation may Some light vegetation encroach into clearing may encroach into area clearing area Shoulder Clearance 3” – 6” 6” – 12” 12” – 18” 12” – 18” 12” – 24” Design Radius No minimum 2’ – 3’ 3’ – 6’ 4’ – 8’ 6’ – 8’ Turn 1 For definitions of Design Parameter attributes (e.g., Design Tread Width and Short Pitch Maximum) see FSH 2309.18, section 05. 2 Trail Classes 3, 4, and 5, in particular, have the potential to provide accessible passage. If assessing or designing trails for accessibility, refer to the Forest Service Trail Accessibility Guidelines (FSTAG) for more specific technical provisions and tolerances (FSM 2350). 3 The determination of trail-specific design grades, design surface, and other Design Parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail. 5 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Design Parameters Design Parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their Designed Use and Trail Class and consistent with their management intent1. Local deviations from any Design Parameter may be established based on trail- specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. Designed Use PACK AND SADDLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Wilderness Typically not designed 12” – 18” 18” – 24” 24” Typically not (Single Lane) or actively managed for May be up to 48” along May be up to 48” along May be up to 48” along designed or actively Tread equestrians, although managed for steep side slopes steep side slopes steep side slopes Width use may be accepted equestrians, although 48” – 60” or greater along 48” – 60” or greater along 48” – 60” or greater along use may be accepted precipices precipices precipices Non-Wilderness 12” – 24” 18” – 48” 24” – 96” (Single Lane) May be up to 48” along 48” – 60” or greater along 48” – 60” or greater along steep side slopes precipices precipices 48” – 60” or greater along precipices Non-Wilderness 60” 60” – 84” 84” – 120” (Double Lane) Structures Other than -bridges: 36” Other than bridges: 36” Other than bridges: 36” (Minimum Width) Bridges without Bridges without handrails: Bridges without handrails: handrails: 60” 60” 60” Bridges with handrails: Bridges with handrails: Bridges with handrails: 84” 84” clear width 84” clear width clear width Design Type Native, limited grading Native with some onsite Native, with improved 2 borrow or imported sections of borrow or Surface May be frequently rough material where needed imported material, routine for stabilization, grading occasional grading Minor roughness Intermittently rough Protrusions ≤ 6” ≤ 3” ≤ 3” May be common and May be common, not Uncommon, not continuous continuous continuous Obstacles 12” 6” 3” (Maximum Height) 10/16/2008 6 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Designed Use PACK AND SADDLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Target Grade 5% – 20% 3% – 12% 2% – 10% Grade 2 Short Pitch Maximum 30% 20% 15% Maximum Pitch Density 15% – 20% of trail 5% – 15% of trail 5% – 10% of trail Design Target Cross Slope 5% – 10% 3% – 5% 0% – 5% Cross Slope Maximum Cross Slope 10% 8% 5% Design Height 8’ – 10’ 10’ 10’ – 12’ Clearing Width 72” 72” – 96” 96” Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area Shoulder Clearance 6” – 12” 12” – 18” 12” – 18” Pack clearance: 36” x 36” Pack clearance: 36” x 36” Pack clearance: 36” x 36” Design Radius 4’ – 5’ 5’ – 8’ 6’ – 10’ Turn 1 For definitions of Design Parameter attributes (e.g., Design Tread Width and Short Pitch Maximum) see FSH 2309.18, section 05. 2 The determination of trail-specific design grades, design surface, and other Design Parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail. 7 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Design Parameters Design Parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their Designed Use and Trail Class and consistent with their management intent1. Local deviations from any Design Parameter may be established based on trail- specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. Designed Use MOTORCYCLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Single Lane Typically not designed 8” – 24” 18” – 36” 24” – 48” Typically not designed or actively managed or actively managed for Tread for motorcycles, motorcycles, although 48” 48 ” – 60” 60” – 72” Width Double Lane although use may be use may be accepted accepted Structures 36” 48” 48” (Minimum Width) Design Type Native, limited grading Native with some onsite Native with imported 2 borrow or imported materials for tread Surface May be continuously material where needed stabilization common, rough for stabilization, routine grading occasional grading Sections of soft or Minor roughness unstable tread on grades Intermittently rough < 5% may be common Sections of soft tread not and continuous Sections of soft or common unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present Protrusions ≤ 6” ≤ 3” ≤ 3” May be common and May be common, not Uncommon, not continuous continuous continuous Obstacles 18” 12” 3” (Maximum Height) May be common or Common, left for Uncommon placed for increased increased challenge challenge Design Target Grade 10% – 25% 5% – 20% 3% – 10% Grade 2 Short Pitch Maximum 40% 25% 15% Maximum Pitch Density 20% – 40% of trail 15% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 8 Appendix D – Attachment 2 10/16/2008 Designed Use MOTORCYCLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Target Cross Slope 5% – 10% 5% – 8% 3% – 5% Cross Maximum Cross Slope 15% 10% 10% Slope Design Height 6’ – 7’ 6’ - 8’ 8’ - 10’ Clearing Width 36” – 48” 48” – 60” 60” - 72” (On steep side-hills, Some light vegetation increase clearing on uphill may encroach into side by 6” – 12”) clearing area Shoulder Clearance 6” – 12” 12” – 18” 12” – 24” Design Radius 3’ – 4’ 4’ – 6’ 5’ – 8’ Turn 1 For definitions of Design Parameter attributes (e.g., Design Tread Width and Short Pitch Maximum) see FSH 2309.18, section 05. 2 The determination of trail-specific grades, surface, and other Design Parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall trail sustainability. 9 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Design Parameters Design Parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their Designed Use and Trail Class and consistent with their management intent1. Local deviations from any Design Parameter may be established based on trail- specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. Designed Use ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Single Lane Typically not designed 48” – 60” 60” 60” – 72” Typically not designed or actively managed or actively managed for Tread for ATVs, although use ATVs, although use Double Lane may be accepted 96” 96” – 108” 96” – 120” may be accepted Width Structures 60” 60” 60” (Minimum Width) Design Type Native, limited grading Native with some onsite Native with imported 2 borrow or imported materials for tread Surface May be continuously material where needed stabilization common, rough for stabilization, routine grading occasional grading Sections of soft or Minor roughness unstable tread on grades Intermittently rough < 5% may be common Sections of soft tread and continuous Sections of soft or not common unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present Protrusions ≤ 6” ≤ 3” ≤ 3” May be common and May be common, not Uncommon, not continuous continuous continuous Obstacles 12” 6” 3” (Maximum Height) May be common or May be common, left for Uncommon placed for increased increased challenge challenge Design Target Grade 10% – 25% 5% – 15% 3% – 10% Grade 2 Short Pitch Maximum 35% 25% 15% Maximum Pitch Density 20% – 40% of trail 15% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 10/16/2008 10 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Designed Use ALL-TERRAIN VEHICLE Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Target Cross Slope 5% – 10% 3% – 8% 3% – 5% Cross Maximum Cross Slope 15% 10% 8% Slope Design Height 6’ – 7’ 6’ – 8’ 8’ – 10’ Clearing Width 60” 60” – 72” 72” - 96” (On steep side hills, Some light vegetation increase clearing on uphill may encroach into side by 6” – 12”) clearing area Shoulder Clearance 0” – 6” 6” – 12” 12” – 18” Design Radius 6’ – 8’ 8’ – 10’ 8’ – 12’ Turn 1 For definitions of Design Parameter attributes (e.g., Design Tread Width and Short Pitch Maximum) see FSH 2309.18, section 05. 2 The determination of trail-specific grades, surface, and other Design Parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail. 11 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Design Parameters Design Parameters are technical guidelines for the survey, design, construction, maintenance, and assessment of National Forest System trails, based on their Designed Use and Trail Class and consistent with their management intent1. Local deviations from any Design Parameter may be established based on trail- specific conditions, topography, or other factors, provided that the deviations are consistent with the general intent of the applicable Trail Class. Designed Use FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE > 50" Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Single Lane Typically not designed 72” – 84” 72” – 96” 96” – 120” Typically not designed or actively managed for or actively managed for Tread 4WD Vehicles > 50”, 4WD Vehicles > 50”, 16’ 16’ 16’ Width Double Lane although use may be although use may be accepted accepted Structures 96” 96” 96” (Minimum Width) Design Type Native, limited grading Native with some onsite Native with imported 2 borrow or imported materials for tread Surface May be continuously material where needed stabilization common, rough for stabilization, routine grading occasional grading Sections of soft or Minor roughness unstable tread on grades Intermittently rough < 5% may be common Sections of soft tread not and continuous Sections of soft or common unstable tread on grades < 5% may be present Protrusions ≤ 12” ≤ 8” ≤ 4” May be common and May be common and May be common and continuous continuous continuous Obstacles 36” 24” 12” (Maximum Height) May be common or Common, left for Uncommon placed for increased increased challenge challenge Design Target Grade 10% – 21% 5% – 18% 5% – 12% Grade2 Short Pitch Maximum 25% 20% 15% Maximum Pitch Density 20% – 30% of trail 10% – 20% of trail 5% – 10% of trail 10/16/2008 12 Appendix D – Attachment 2 Designed Use FOUR WHEEL DRIVE VEHICLE > 50" Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Design Target Cross Slope 8% – 15% 5% – 12% 5% – 8% Cross Maximum Cross Slope 15% 12% 8% Slope Design Height 6’ – 8’ 6’ – 8’ 8’ – 10’ Clearing Width 72” – 84” 72” – 96” 96” - 144” Some light vegetation may encroach into clearing area Shoulder Clearance 0” – 6” 6” – 12” 12” – 18” Design Radius 10’ – 15’ 15’ – 20’ 20’ – 30’ Turn 1 For definitions of Design Parameter attributes (e.g., Design Tread Width and Short Pitch Maximum) see FSH 2309.18, section 05. 2 The determination of trail-specific design grades, design surface, and other Design Parameters should be based upon soils, hydrological conditions, use levels, erosion potential, and other factors contributing to surface stability and overall sustainability of the trail. 13 Appendix D – Attachment 3 Trail Management Objectives TMO: Setting the Standard Trail Management Objectives (TMOs) are fundamental building blocks for trail management. TMOs tier from and reflect forest plan, travel management and/or trail-specific management direction. TMOs synthesize and document, in one convenient place, the management intention for the trail, and provide basic reference information for subsequent trail planning, management, condition surveys, and reporting. The documentation of TMOs for each system trail makes good management sense, and is a pre- requisite for completing a TRACS Survey. Why TMOs? A trail cannot be effectively managed or a determination made of what’s needed to meet standard until basic questions like these have been answered: What is the purpose of the trail? What type of use is the trail being managed for? What is the intended level of development of the trail? In the past, some trails have been managed based largely on the type or amount of use they were currently getting, without sufficient consideration of the intended use or future trends and needs. This sometimes resulted in managing a trail for a type or level of use that was not compatible with the trail management direction, design, or location. Establishing and communicating the intended TMOs for each system trail is a proactive step that prevents this from occurring. Developing Effective TMOs Each TMO should be approved by a line officer after review and recommendation from the unit trail manager. For districts, it is recommended that the forest planning group and trail coordinator review these objectives prior to district ranger approval. This will ensure that the objectives for a trail are consistent with the forest plan, district and forest travel management plans, and anticipated future land management actions. This will also ensure consistency between units so that one trail will not be motorized on one district then switch to pack and saddle stock at the district boundary. TMOs should be established for every trail, or trail segment when TMO variables change along the trail. Instructions and reference material for developing TMOs are provided on the following pages of this section, in applicable sections of the TRACS User Guide, and on the USFS website for Recreation, Heritage and Wilderness Resources Integrated Business Systems (www.fs.fed.us/3/measures/trails.htm). 1 Appendix D – Attachment 3 TMO Form Instructions Establishing and documenting Trail Management Objectives (TMOs) prior to doing a trail condition survey is critical to getting high quality results— results that will benefit trail management efforts for years to come. The instructions below explain how to complete each field on the TRACS TMO Form. Refer also to the attached TMO Form and TMO Example on the following pages. Additional guidance and TMO reference materials can be found in the TRACS User Guide Appendices, Infra Trails documentation, and on the USFS website for Recreation, Heritage and Wilderness Resources Integrated Business Systems (www.fs.fed.us/3/measures/trails.htm). Overall Trail Information Region / Forest / District: Enter the Region number, Forest name (or number), and District name (or number). Trail Name & Trail Number: Enter the official trail name and trail number. These should correspond exactly to the Trail Name and Trail Number recorded in Infra Trails. Double-check for correct spelling and use of spaces. Trail Beginning & Ending Termini: Enter a brief narrative description identifying the location of the beginning and ending trail termini. These should correspond exactly with what is recorded in Infra Trails. Beginning & Ending Mileposts: Enter the beginning milepost or measure point, and the ending milepost for the trail. These should correspond exactly with what is recorded in Infra Trails. Trail Inventory Length: Enter the length of the trail in miles. This mileage should match what is recorded in Infra Trails. Mileage accuracy recorded on the TMO should correspond to the method of collection (Trail Mileage Source): Wheel: If the length was wheeled with a cyclometer, use three decimal places (i.e.3.641). [Note: 0.001 miles equals approx. 5 feet] GPS: If the length was collected by GPS, use two decimal places (i.e. 3.64). Map or Unknown: If the actual length is unknown, or was determined by cartographic feature file (CFF) or by vehicle, use no more than one decimal place of accuracy (i.e. 3.6). 2 Appendix D – Attachment 3 Trail Mileage Source: Check the box that corresponds to the source of the mileage above. This is the mileage metadata for reference. TMO Trail Section Some trails may have more than one set of objectives. Normally this occurs when a TMO variable changes along distinct segments of the trail, such as between junctions or destinations. Examples can include changes in Trail Class, ROS, Design Parameters, or Prohibited Uses. If applicable, use the TMO Trail Section block to identify multiple TMOs by trail section. If not applicable, leave this section blank. Section #: Enter a number or letter to sequentially identify the trail section and corresponding TMO (i.e. Segment #: 1, 2, 3, etc.). Section Beginning & Ending Termini: Enter a brief narrative description identifying the location of the beginning and ending termini for this trail segment. Section Beginning & Ending Milepost: Enter the beginning milepost or measure point, and the ending milepost for this trail segment. Designed Use Objectives Trail Type: A fundamental trail category that indicates the predominant trail surface or trail foundation, and the general mode of travel the trail accommodates. The Trail Type differentiates between the three basic kinds of trails: Standard/Terra, Snow, or Water. Each Trail Type is stored in the Infra database as a separate record, even when, for example, a Snow Trail mostly or totally overlaps a Standard/Terra Trail. Assign one Trail Type for the trail. Trail Class: The prescribed scale of trail development, representing the intended design and management standards of the trail. The National Trail Management Classes are outlined in the National Trails Management Class Matrix, which can be found in Appendix B and posted on the IBS website (www.fs.fed.us/r3/measures/trails.htm). Assign the most appropriate Trail Class for the trail or trail segment. If more than one Trail Class is assigned to the trail, identify each Trail Class by individual trail segment (see TMO Trail Section above). ROS/WROS Class: The Recreational Opportunity Spectrum (ROS) class has likely been assigned to the area by the forest plan and helps ensure the transportation system is managed accordingly. ROS and Wilderness ROS (WROS) classes are mutually exclusive. 3 Appendix D – Attachment 3 Locate and refer to the forest ROS and/or Wilderness classification maps. Assign the appropriate ROS/WROS to this segment of the trail. If multiple ROS/WROS classes exist along the trail, consider either segmenting the trail or using the dominant class (see TMO Trail Section above). Note: Pending finalization of nationally standardized definitions for WROS categories, refer to regional protocols for WROS definitions, with WROS 1 representing the most pristine and WROS 5 representing the most modified end of the WROS spectrum. The WROS 6 category can be used for Other. Designed Use: The intended use that controls the desired geometric design of the trail, and determines the subsequent maintenance parameters for the trail. The Designed Use must be identified for each trail or trail segment. The Designed Use identifies the single use or limiting factor that drives technical Design Parameters for the trail (i.e. tread width, grade, turning radius, etc.). The Designed Use is necessary to establish the trail’s geometric design standards from which the trail is designed, constructed, operated, and maintained. While several Managed Uses may occur on the trail, there is only one Designed Use for any given trail or trail segment. For an expanded explanation of Designed Use, refer to Trail Fundamentals in Appendix A and posted on the IBS website (www.fs.fed.us/r3/measures/trails.htm). Select only one Designed Use per trail or trail segment Design Parameters: Technical specifications for trail construction and maintenance, based on the Designed Use and Trail Class. Design Parameters identify the technical specifications that drive trail design, construction, maintenance, and subsequent reconstruction. For each combination of Designed Use and Trail Class, there is a corresponding set of nationally established Design Parameters. These nationally established Design Parameters, which are included in Appendix C and are also posted on the IBS website, should be used as a basis for determining specific Design Parameters for a trail or trail segment. Additional design criteria are also important, such as back slope angle for example, but are not included in the national Design Parameters as they tend to be very site-specific and require sound engineering judgment to define. Some of the national Design Parameters are presented as specific values or narrative descriptions, while others are presented as an appropriate range of values. For those values presented as numeric ranges, a trail-specific value that falls within the range should be identified and recorded on the TMO form. For example, on a Hiker/Pedestrian Trail Class 4, the nationally established Design Tread Width is listed as 32 to 96 inches to reflect single-to- multilane trails. The trail-specific Design Tread Width, however, should be recorded as a specific value appropriate for the trail (i.e. 48 inches). Local deviations to any national Design Parameter may be established based on specific trail conditions, topography and other factors, provided that the variations continue to reflect the general intent of the national Trail Classes. 4 Appendix D – Attachment 3 Assign a specific value for each Design Parameter variable listed. This is not intended to be an all-encompassing list of specifications, but a list of only the dominant criteria that most define the geometric shape of the trail. Footnote any trail-specific exceptions to the national Design Parameters in the corresponding Design Parameter field, and explain or justify the exception in the Remarks section of the TMO. Add any additional Design Parameter factors and corresponding values that are deemed important to this specific segment of trail and are necessary for achieving the trail objectives. Target Frequency: Target Frequency indicates how often a routine task should be completed in order to maintain the trail to standard. Each trail requires a recurring interval for routine maintenance tasks in order to keep the trail functional, stable and useable. For example, brush grows at a certain rate and to keep a trail operational, the brush must be cut at fairly regular intervals. These intervals, which vary by trail and by task, are generally site or area-specific and require local experience to define. For the applicable tasks, define the maintenance interval that best reflects the frequency necessary to keep this trail or trail segment to standard. Any period within that interval should be considered “to standard”. The interval is expressed in years. Examples: Task: Frequency: Recorded As: Trail Opening once every year 1.0 Brushing once every 3 years 0.33 Logging Out two times per year 2.0 Travel Management Strategies Travel Management Strategies are very important for effective and efficient trail management. Establishing Travel Management Strategies for major trail uses helps the manager balance the needs of conflicting uses, guides the manager on operational tradeoff’s, and assist maintenance crews to efficiently target maintenance efforts to only necessary tasks. This section of the TMO form documents basic information that should also be recorded in the ATM portion of Infra Trails. Managed Use: The modes of travel that are actively managed and appropriate, considering the design and management of the trail. Managed Use indicates a management decision or intent to accommodate and/or encourage a specified type of trail use. Accommodating the Managed Use frequently results in user-specific trail maintenance and/or signing needs and costs. Record each use that is actively managed on the trail or trail segment. There may be more than one Managed Use per trail or trail segment. 5 Appendix D – Attachment 3 For each Managed Use, document the dates during which that use is actively managed for that use. If there is more than one season of use for a particular Managed Use, record that using the blank space provided under the list of Managed Uses. Managed Season of Use (To/From): The Managed Season of Use specifically defines the period of the time that the trail is available and managed in a safe and sufficient state for the defined user. It is intended to bracket the times that the Forest is responsible for providing that opportunity. Examples: • One obvious example would be when a trail is covered by snow and outside of the Managed Season of Use. During this time, the Forest does not intend to provide an accessible tread as this would require snow removal and is not part of the managed trail opportunity. Conversely, during the Managed Season of Use, the Forest intends to maintain the accessible tread in a safe and functional condition. • A less obvious example would be if the trail has a Hiker Travel Management Strategy of Encourage with a Managed Season of Use from March 1 to November 15. In this case, the Forest would be responsible for providing stream crossings during high water in June (i.e. trail bridges). Changing the Managed Season of Use for the same example to June 30 to November 15, thus bypassing the June run-off, would alleviate this conflict and clearly define management expectations. Prohibited Use: Mode of travel prohibited by official legal order. Record any use that is prohibited by an official prohibition or closure order. Document the dates during which the use is prohibited. Footnote and cite the specific CFR under Remarks / Reference Information. Other Use: This section is provided to document additional trail-specific information and Travel Management Strategies as needed. If applicable, record other Travel Management Strategies for the trail that were not captured under Managed Use or Prohibited Use. Check whether the use is Accepted (allowed, while not actively managed for), Discouraged, or Eliminated. Special Considerations Use this section to identify any additional considerations that trail managers, design, construction or maintenance personnel should be aware of. Check any applicable special consideration for the trail or trail segment, underlining the appropriate clarifier shown in parenthesis. Footnote the consideration, and provide details and/or reference for corresponding direction or decision documents under Remarks / Reference Information. 6 Appendix D – Attachment 3 Remarks / Reference Information Use this area to provide additional information or clarification, or to cite reference decisions and materials related to information documented earlier in the TMO. When clarifying information documented in previous sections of the TMO, it is recommended that a footnote be added next to the TMO entry, followed by a footnoted explanation in the Remarks / Reference section. Example: Footnoted Items in TMO Sections: Design Parameters Basic Tread Width, inches 24” 1 Maintenance Frequency Trail Opening 1 2 Special Considerations T&E or Sensitive Species Present X 3 Footnote Explanations in Remarks: Remarks / Reference Information 1 Tread width exceptions allowed at existing wood trail structures. 2 Complete annual Trail Opening by 6/15. 3 Goose grass sedge, sensitive plant, located in 1st mile of trail, refer to 3/15/1999 BE for Smith Ridge Trail for mitigation specifications. Line Officer Approval Having the District Ranger or line officer approve Trail Management Objectives is essential. The TMO pulls together and documents management direction and expectations for the trail. A documented, approved TMO provides the trail manager and the trail maintenance crews with the key tool they need to confidently work on the trail without having to second-guess operational and maintenance choices. The TMO establishes the base standards against which trail condition surveys and prescriptions are measured and completed. It also ensures a management framework of continuity and consistency over time and through personnel changes. Succinctly put, the TMO pulls it all together. 7 Appendix D – Attachment 3 8 Appendix D – Attachment 3 9 Appendix D – Attachment 3 10 Appendix D – Attachment 3 TMO Example 11 Appendix D – Attachment 3 12 Appendix D – Attachment 4 TRAIL OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CONSIDERATIONS Trail Operation and Maintenance Considerations are general guidelines for developing trail prescriptions and managing, operating, and maintaining National Forest System trails. The considerations are a starting point and likely will need to be adapted to reflect local financial capability and other circumstances. Exceptions to the Trail Operation and Maintenance Considerations may occur at the trail-specific, district, forest or grassland, or regional level. Trail Trail Class 1 Trail Class 2 Trail Class 3 Trail Class 4 Trail Class 5 Attributes Minimally Developed Moderately Developed Developed Highly Developed Fully Developed Trail Typically managed to Typically managed to Typically managed to Typically managed to Typically managed to Management accommodate: accommodate: accommodate: accommodate: accommodate: Low use levels Low-to-moderate use levels Moderate to heavy use Very heavy use Intensive use Highly skilled users who are Moderately to highly skilled Users with intermediate skill Users with minimal skills and Users with limited skills and comfortable off-trail users, capable negotiating level and experience experience experience Users with high degree of obstacles Users with minimal orienteering Users with minimal or no Typically meets agency orienteering skill Users with moderate skills orienteering skills requirements for accessibility orienteering skill Some travel modes and ability Moderately easy travel by Easy travel by Managed Uses levels may be impractical or Many types of uses, but Managed Uses Water Trails: basic navigating impossible and may not be challenging and requires Water Trails: basic to moderate and paddling skills required encouraged advanced skills navigating and paddling skills May be or has potential to be Water Trails: users with high Water Trails: users with required made accessible level of navigation/orientation moderate to high level of Random potential for accessible and paddling skills navigation/orientation and use paddling skills Maintenance Resource protection Resource protection Resource protection User comfort and ease User comfort and ease Indicators Safety commensurate with Safety commensurate with User convenience Resource protection High level of accessibility for targeted recreation experience targeted recreational Safety commensurate with Safety commensurate with Managed Uses experience targeted recreation experience targeted recreation experience Safety commensurate with targeted recreation experience Routine Infrequent or no scheduled Maintenance scheduled to Trail cleared for availability early Trail cleared at earliest Typically, maintenance Maintenance maintenance preserve the trail and its in its season of use and for opportunity to make it available conducted at least annually, or Frequency and location preservation of its integrity for season of use as needed to meet posted Intensity 1 Typically, maintenance conducted every 5 or more Typically, maintenance Typically, maintenance Typically, maintenance conditions years or in response to reports conducted every 3-5 years or in conducted every 1-3 years or in conducted at least annually Typically, major damage or of unusual resource problems response to reports of unusual response to reports of trail or safety concerns corrected or requiring repair resource problems requiring resource damage or significant posted within 24 hours of repair obstacles to Managed Use and discovery experience level 1 Maintenance in this category does not include routine trail condition assessment surveys. 1 Appendix D – Attachment 4 NATIONAL QUALITY STANDARDS FOR TRAILS Key Measure: HEALTH AND CLEANLINESS 1. Visitors are not exposed to human waste along trails. 2. The trail and trailside are free of litter. 3. The trail and trailside are free of graffiti. Key Measure: RESOURCE SETTING 1. *Effects from trail use do not conflict with environmental laws (such as the Endangered Species Act, National Historic Preservation Act, and Clean Water Act).1 2. Resource management adjacent to and along the trail corridor is consistent with ROS objectives and desired conditions of adjacent management areas. 3. Trail opportunities, trail development, and trail management are consistent with the Recreation Management System (Recreation Opportunity Spectrum, Scenery Management System, and Benefits Based Management) objectives and the applicable land management plan. 4. The trail, use of the trail, and trail maintenance do not cause unacceptable damage to other resources. 5. Trail use does not exceed trail capacity. Key Measure: SAFETY & SECURITY 1. *Hazards do not exist on or along the trail.1 2. Applicable laws, regulations, and special orders are enforced. Key Measure: RESPONSIVENESS 1. *When a trail is signed as accessible, it meets current agency policy and accessibility guidelines.1 2. Information is posted in a clear and professional manner. 3. Visitors are provided opportunities to communicate their expectations for and satisfaction with NFS trails. Key Measure: CONDITION OF FACILITIES 1. Annual/Routine Maintenance. The trail and its structures are serviceable and in good repair throughout their designed service life. 2. Deferred Maintenance. Trails that are in disrepair due to lack of scheduled maintenance, are in violation of applicable safety codes or other regulatory requirements (such as applicable accessibility guidelines), or are beyond their designed service life are repaired, rehabilitated, replaced, or decommissioned, as appropriate. 3. Capital Improvement. New, altered, or expanded trails meet Forest Service design standards and are consistent with standards and guidelines in the applicable land management plan. 1 Indicates a Critical National Quality Standard. If it cannot be met, action must be taken as soon as practicable to correct or mitigate the problem. Refer to FSH 2309.18, section 15. 2 Appendix D – Attachment 5 WO Recreation, Heritage, and Volunteer Resources letter to Regional Foresters, Subject Regional Guidance for “Considering Conversion of a National Forest System Road to a National Forest System Trail” File Code: 2350 Date: March 1, 2013 Route To: (2300) Subject: Conversion of National Forest Service (NFS) Road to NFS Trail To: Regional Foresters, Station Directors, Area Director, IITF Director, Deputy Chiefs and WO Directors Please find enclosed the National guidance for “Considering Conversion of a National Forest System Road to a National Forest System Trail.” This guidance was developed for field use and will be included in the Trails Handbook. Field units shall use this guidance to be consistent with the upcoming placement within the Forest Service Handbook (FSH). This guidance has been supported by the National Trails Board, Regional Recreation Directors and approved by the Director of Recreation for inclusion in the FSH. /s/ Kenneth Karkula (for) N. ROBIN MORGAN Acting Director of Recreation, Heritage, and Volunteer Resources Enclosure cc: Jonathan Stephens 1 Appendix D – Attachment 5 Process for Considering Conversion of a National Forest System Road to a National Forest System Trail Under Subpart A of the Travel Management Rule December 10, 2012 Background Subpart A of the travel management rule states: “Responsible officials must review the road system on each National Forest and Grassland and identify the roads on lands under Forest Service jurisdiction that are no longer needed to meet forest resource management objectives, and that, therefore, should be decommissioned or considered for other uses, such as for trails.” (36 CFR 212.5(b)(2) (emphasis added)). By the end of fiscal year 2015, each administrative unit must complete the travel analysis process (see FSH 7709.55, ch. 20) for all National Forest System (NFS) roads (maintenance levels 1 through 5) on that unit. The Travel Management Communication Outreach for Subpart A provides further guidance on this topic. The travel analysis process may identify NFS roads that may be considered for conversion to NFS trails. General Guidance Careful consideration should be given before converting a NFS road to a NFS trail. Each route should be considered individually. It is not appropriate to convert NFS roads to NFS trails on a unit without carefully considering the advantages and disadvantages, including but not limited to; existing trail system, user preferences and demands, resource degradation issues, and availability of maintenance funding for the unit’s entire trail system. Consideration should be given to the financial capability of the trail program to maintain potential NFS trails and the suitability of using an NFS road as an NFS trail in terms of the recreational experience, environmental effects, and needed repair or other mitigation. If an NFS road is identified for potential conversion to an NFS trail during travel analysis, FSM 2353.28j, paragraph 1, and 7703.27 should be consulted. FSM 7703.27 states: When considering converting unneeded NFS roads to NFS trails or identifying coincidental NFS roads and NFS trails, consider the following: a. Whether the route would provide a recreation experience consistent with desired trail management objectives (TMOs) (FSM 2353.12); b. Environmental effects of the continued existence of the route; 2 Appendix D – Attachment 5 c. Need for mitigation, removal, repair, or alteration of structures along the route; and d. Long-term trail maintenance and available funding. e. See FSM 7731.11 for further direction. FSM 2353.28j(1) states: NFS roads and NFS trails designated for motor vehicle use provide different recreation opportunities and may serve different purposes. Driving on trails may present different challenges and require different skills from driving on roads. Trails designed for motor vehicles are generally characterized by narrower treads and clearing limits, slower speeds, narrower turning radii, and a more intimate experience with the surrounding landscape than roads designed for motor vehicles. While roads often provide a recreation experience, they are usually intended to provide access for multiple purposes on NFS lands and may connect neighboring communities. Visitors value roads as a means of access to NFS lands and as connections between NFS destinations such as trailheads, campgrounds, and overlooks, as well as a means of recreation. Process for Considering a Road to Trail Conversion Based on the appropriate analysis, Travel Analysis Report (TAR), landscape scale analysis or other, a recommendation(s) are made to the responsible official regarding whether a particular NFS road should be considered for conversion to an NFS trail. To support a recommendation for conversion, the following three criteria should be met: 1. The converted route would meet its Trail Management Objectives (TMOs) and provide the desired recreation experience; 2. Adequate funding is available to cover the work to convert and maintain the route; and 3. The environmental effects of the converted route would be acceptable to the responsible official. To address these criteria, the following steps should be followed: 1. During the travel analysis process, actively engage trails managers in the interdisciplinary process. 2. Develop draft TMOs for the potential trail so that it is clear how the trail would be managed. TMOs address Trail Type, Trail Class, Managed Use, Designed Use, Design Parameters, Recreation Opportunity Spectrum classifications, maintenance criteria, travel management strategies, and special considerations. 3. Describe the recreation experience to be offered by the potential trail based on the following considerations: 3 Appendix D – Attachment 5 a. Whether the potential conversion would be consistent with the standards and guidelines in the applicable land management plan. b. Whether the potential conversion would provide quality recreation opportunities, such as enhancing trail connectivity, creating trail loops, or otherwise improving the quality of trail opportunities. 4. Identify the work needed for route conversion and maintenance and the short-term and long-term costs. The characteristics of a road to be converted are an important factor. For example, the cost of converting and maintaining a two-track road across flat terrain would likely be substantially less than the cost of converting and maintaining a full-bench road with large fills and culverts. Consider the following guidance from the Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide: a. Carefully review or revise trail-specific design parameters to accommodate the managed uses and the designed use for the trail. Adjustments may be needed in the design tread width and grade, clearing limits, turning radii, and other factors. For example, a trail prescription may identify narrowing of the tread width and clearing limit to meet the intended design parameters and provide the desired trail experience. These types of adjustments may occur naturally over time or may be designed and implemented through on-site field work. Design parameters for motorcycles, all- terrain vehicles, and four-wheel-drive vehicles may be found in FSH 2309.18, section 23. b. Consider minor or major realignment of trail segments as needed to provide the desired trail experience. c. Assess existing and needed route structures, including drainage and crossing structures. This assessment may include consideration of opportunities to modify existing structures or to construct new structures that are more appropriate for trail vehicles. d. Assess existing signs, and make appropriate adjustments before the route is managed as a trail. 5. Follow the environmental analysis process as outlined in Agency regulations 36 CFR 220 and FSH 1909.15. 6. Identify the funding source and its availability to cover the costs associated with the work required to convert and maintain the trail. The Travel Analysis Process (TAP) is an assessment which will inventory and identify potential future opportunities in managing our existing road system. The Travel Analysis Report will document the TAP and will be the basis to inform future travel management decisions. As elaborated above, there is a great deal to consider in any conversion of any road to a trail. 4 Appendix D – Attachment 6 R3 Regional Forester letter to Forest Supervisors, Subject: Signing for Travel Management Rule File Code: 7700 Date: September 20, 2011 Route To: (2350), (5300) Subject: Signing for Travel Management Rule Implementation To: Forest Supervisors, Region 3 Special Agent in Charge Forests in the Southwestern Region are making progress in designating routes and areas for motor vehicle use per the Travel Management Rule (TMR), 36 CFR 212, Subpart B. To date, the Region has published 11 Motor Vehicle Maps (MVUM) and several more will be published in the coming months. To assist Forests in addressing implementation issues, the Washington Office has developed a Route and Area Designation Implementation Guide (Implementation Guide), to assist in identifying tasks and priorities for implementing TMR decisions. Forests are encouraged to use the guide, and in particular the Sign Appendix, as they begin to develop implementation strategies. The guide is organized around the framework of the four “E’s:” Education, Engineering, Enforcement and Evaluation and is available on the FSWeb at http://fsweb.wo.fs.fed.us/rhwr/ohv/implementation/documents/TM_Implementation%20Guide_May 2010.pdf . One of the first strategies to implementing TMR decisions is to utilize signing. Consistent use of appropriate route markers to identify designated routes is an important key to helping the public understand the MVUM and know where they can legally take motor vehicles. At a minimum, all designated routes displayed on the MVUM should be clearly marked on the ground with route markers. Forests should plan for and install route markers in accordance with Forest Service signing policy so that route markers are in place when MVUMs are published. Agency policy on route markers can be found in FSM 7719.42 and EM 7100-15, “Standards for Forest Service Signs and Posters.” Route markers should be placed only on roads and trails under Forest Service jurisdiction, at each NFS road or trail junction, and at the point where Forest Service jurisdiction begins if there is no junction. Route markers may be used for reassurance if it is not readily apparent which route the user may be on, beyond intersections on highly traveled routes, and periodically along the route with no more than five miles between reassurance markers. The TMR moves Forests to a "closed unless designated open" situation. Therefore, the MVUM, in conjunction with route markers, should be sufficient to clearly communicate where motor vehicle use is allowed and not allowed. Signing all routes as either open or closed is not consistent with current sign policy or national guidance, is unnecessary to fulfill the requirements of the TMR, and could make enforcement problematic. In most cases, this practice has been ineffective in preventing the proliferation of unauthorized routes and resulted in additional sign procurement, installation and maintenance. Forests are not to use such signing or develop “non-standard” methods of identifying allowed motorized uses on roads and trails such as red or green stickers. 1 Appendix D – Attachment 6 In addition to route markers, the use of appropriate travel management signs, posters and additional user friendly maps can be effective in communicating the information on the MVUM and may provide additional clarification in special situations. However, widespread or inconsistent use of signs may also cause confusion for users and incur unneeded costs. Use of travel management signs to supplement the MVUM is optional and should be well thought out in a sign plan that considers the cost of sign procurement, installation, long term sign maintenance, and consistency with adjacent units. Forests should carefully consider the use of signs (other than route markers), to communicate MVUM designations and must ensure that all signs comply with current Forest Service Signing policy, contained in FSM 7701, EM- 7110-15, and the Implementation Guide. While additional travel management signs may be useful, first priority should be given to installation of route markers at correct locations and that match the route numbers on MVUM. Other signs and route markers on non-designated routes should be installed as needed and as resources allow. Since most forests are just beginning to implement TMR designations, units should work with their Forest Sign Coordinator to develop a TMR sign plan that provides forest-wide consistency and ensures that all signs and posters are planned, designed, procured, installed and maintained according to the guidance in EM-7100-15. The sign plans should focus on the minimum signs needed to begin implementation. Additional signs may always be installed at a later date, if the need arises. It is important to recognize that signing is just one of many strategies for effectively implementing the TMR. The need for signs will change as more MVUMs are released in the region and as Forest users become more familiar with and use MVUMs. In addition, our ability to rely on signs for TMR implementation will become more and more difficult as we face the challenges of declining budgets. For additional information on TMR implementation, contact the Regional TMR Coordinator, Ruth Doyle at (505) 842-3451. For specific questions regarding Forest Service signing policies, please contact your Forest Sign Coordinator or the Regional Sign Coordinator, John Elmquist at (505) 842-3831. /s/ Roberta Buskirk (for) CORBIN L. NEWMAN, JR. Regional Forester cc: Robin Poague Christopher Boehm 2 Appendix D – Attachment 7 Draft Cost Template/Scheduling Example: All road, trail, sign standards, sign, vehicle and employee costs will be reviewed to make sure they are current and signing needs verified after the Record of Decision. Tables 1 and 6 will be completed for each District. Signs planned to be installed by volunteers will be incorporated into the schedule. Travel Management Sign Implementation/Cost Schedule – Table 1: District TM Identified Signing Needs Task Priority Implementation Cost Method Funding Lead Staff Period * Road Route Marker 1 ML1-5 route markers $ Sign Crew CMRD/CFRD/ Engineering/Recr Installation (5%) installed in 4-6 months of Grants eation per 5% First year of of implementation District Trail Route Marker 2 Routes currently managed $ Sign Crew CMTL/grants Engineering/Recr Installation as roads proposed to be eation converted to motorized trail route markers installed as decision is implemented to convert the road to an NFS system trail Road Closed Stickers 3 4-6 months of installation $ Sign/Fire NFRW/CMFC Recreation /year in First 2+ years of (estimate Crew / /Grants implementation based on Designated GS-3/4 Employees crew) Public Information 4 3-4 months of installation $ Contract or NFRW/CMFC Recreation Kiosks in first year of Sign/Fire /Grants implementation Crew Portal Sign 5 6-8 weeks of installation in $ Sign Crew CMRD/CFRD/ Engineering first year of Grants Installation implementation End of Road Markers 6 8-10 weeks of installation $ Sign Crew CMRD/NFRW Engineering / in first year of /CMFC/Grants Recreation implementation Entrance Closure 7 As required $ Road Crew CMRD/CFRD Engineering Road Decommission/Oblite 8 Target: 2 miles / year $ Road Crew CMRD/CFRD Engineering ration None in 2014 * Costs are rough estimates and subject to change 1 Appendix D – Attachment 7 Cost Estimates – Table 2: Route Marker Installation/Replacement (5%) Signs # of Signs on Road % Av. Installed/Replaced System Missing/Damaged Signs/Intersection Total Payson Pleasant Valley Globe Mesa 5% 1.75 Tonto Basin 5% 1.75 Cave Creek 5% 1.25 TOTAL REQUIRED= EMPLOYEE Cost per Day Days COSTS GS-3 Employee $100.00 65 $ 6,500.00 GS-3 Employee $ 100.00 65 $ 6,500.00 $ TOTAL COST= 13,000.00 Rental Cost / VEHICLE Month TIME (months) UNITS COSTS 4x4 Truck $254.00 4 $ 1,016.00 Mileage Costs Cost/mile Time (months) Miles / Month COSTS 4x4 Truck $ 0.33 4 3250 $ 4,290.00 TOTAL COSTS= $ 5,306.00 SUPPLY COST / Unit UNITS Vertical Route Marker Signs CIB30_66_03 $8.72 $ Stickers (av. 4 / Vertical Route Marker) $0.60 $ Vertical Route Marker Post Pounders $200.00 1 $200.00 Vertical Route Marker Pullers $400.00 1 $400.00 Other (GPS) $200.00 1 $200.00 TOTAL SUPPLY ASSUMPTIONS MADE: COSTS= $ TOTAL COST / YEAR= $ ***less efficiency as sign replacement are spread out and not concentrated ***higher mileage costs ***roughly 600 signs are installed each year assuming 5% replacement need 2 Appendix D – Attachment 7 Table 3: Trail Route Marker Installation Converted Roads to Trails Signs Av. Installed/Replaced # of Trailheads Signs/Trailhead Total Payson Pleasant Valley Globe Mesa Tonto Basin Cave Creek TOTAL REQUIRED= EMPLOYEE Cost per Day COSTS GS-3 Employee $100.00 $ 6,500.00 GS-3 Employee $ 100.00 $ 6,500.00 $ TOTAL COST= 13,000.00 Rental Cost / VEHICLE Month UNITS COSTS 4x4 Truck $254.00 $ 1,016.00 Mileage Costs Cost/mile Miles / Month COSTS 4x4 Truck $ 0.33 3250 $ 4,290.00 TOTAL COSTS= $ 5,306.00 SUPPLY COST / Unit UNITS $ $ 1 $200.00 1 $400.00 1 $200.00 TOTAL SUPPLY COSTS= $ TOTAL COST / YEAR= $ ASSUMPTIONS MADE ***higher mileage costs ***roughly x signs are installed each year – assuming 5% replacement needed for trail signs 3 Appendix D – Attachment 7 Table 4: OHV Area Signs (including tot lots) Signs Av. Installed/Replaced # of Trailheads Signs/Trailhead Total Globe Mesa 1.75 Tonto Basin 1.75 Cave Creek 1.25 TOTAL REQUIRED= EMPLOYEE Cost per Day COSTS GS-3 Employee $100.00 $ 6,500.00 GS-3 Employee $ 100.00 $ 6,500.00 $ TOTAL COST= 13,000.00 Rental Cost / VEHICLE Month UNITS COSTS 4x4 Truck $254.00 $ 1,016.00 Mileage Costs Cost/mile Miles / Month COSTS 4x4 Truck $ 0.33 3250 $ 4,290.00 TOTAL COSTS= $ 5,306.00 SUPPLY COST / Unit UNITS $ $ 1 $200.00 1 $400.00 1 $200.00 TOTAL SUPPLY COSTS= $ TOTAL COST / YEAR= $ 4 Appendix D – Attachment 7 Table 5: Permit Zone Signs Signs Av. Installed/Replaced # of Trailheads Signs/Trailhead Total Mesa 1.75 Cave Creek 1.25 TOTAL REQUIRED= EMPLOYEE Cost per Day COSTS GS-3 Employee $100.00 $ 6,500.00 GS-3 Employee $ 100.00 $ 6,500.00 $ TOTAL COST= 13,000.00 Rental Cost / VEHICLE Month UNITS COSTS 4x4 Truck $254.00 $ 1,016.00 Mileage Costs Cost/mile Miles / Month COSTS 4x4 Truck $ 0.33 3250 $ 4,290.00 TOTAL COSTS= $ 5,306.00 SUPPLY COST / Unit UNITS $ $ 1 $200.00 1 $400.00 1 $200.00 TOTAL SUPPLY COSTS= $ TOTAL COST / YEAR= $ 5 Appendix D – Attachment 7 Table 6: Portal Sign Cost Estimate. MATERIAL COSTS (District) Road / Sign Type Sign Cost U Ch. Posts Total Cost # of Signs OML 2 (18"x12") w 1.1 ib/lf $38.00 $6.50 $44.50 - - OML 2 (24"x18") w 2.2 ib/lf $ 38.00 $12.94 $ 50.94 $ OML 3 (24"x60") w 2.2 ib/lf $93.50 $43.86 $137.36 $ Total: $ Labor Costs (Small Signs) # Cost/Day # of Days (≈6-8/day) GS-3 1 $101 $ GS-4 0 $110 Labor Costs (Large Signs) # Cost/Day # of Days (≈2-3/day) GS-3 1 $101 $ GS-4 1 $110 $ Total: $ Vehicle Costs # of Trucks Months Cost/Month 4x4 Truck 2 1 $245.00 $ 490.00 Miles Cost/Mile Mileage 2 1700 $ 0.33 $ 1,122.00 Total: $ TOTAL COSTS OF TMR SIGNING PROJECT= $ 6 Appendix E Tonto National Forest Draft Radio Communications and Check-In and Check-Out Program: Written Plan October 25, 2013 2324 E. Mcdowell Rd Phoenix AZ, 85006 Tonto National Forest Check-In and Check-Out Program: Written Plan Prepared by Program Administrator – Helen Graham Sign ______Date______ Reviewed by Fire Staff Officer – Clay Templin Sign ______Date______ Reviewed by PIFC Manager (Dispatch) – Paul Womack Sign ______Date______ Reviewed by Safety Manager or Officer – Bradley Eadelman Sign ______Date______ Approved by Line Officer or Official-in-Charge – Neil Bosworth Sign ______Date______ Reviewed by Union Representative (organized units) Sign ______Date______ Program Purpose The purpose of this program is to ensure the Tonto National Forest is in compliance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 CFR 1910.38 and FSM 6700 and 6709.11, chapter 10. This check-in and check-out program shall account for the location and safety of employees. The program is designed to ensure a set of protocols is in place to account for employees in the office and when they are away from their duty station. All employees, including hosted, virtual, and telework employees, and volunteers shall be included in the Tonto National Forest check-in and check-out program. Objective The objectives of this plan are to: • Provide for the safety of employees in the field • Have accountability of all employees in the field • Ensure all employees return to their duty station safely • Ensure proper radio communications across the Forest • Avoid unnecessary delay in responding to employees who may need assistance 1 Minimum Requirements The program will include the following requirements: • Workplace Assessment • Protocols • Training • Recordkeeping • Program Evaluation Workplace Assessment A check-in and check-out workplace assessment of the Tonto National Forest was conducted on October 08, 2013 by Bradley Eadelman. Seven items were considered in the assessment: types of employees, work environments and settings, working conditions, types of travel and field activities, availability and status of communication systems and equipment, availability of dispatch or other personnel, and availability of emergency response resources. Employees Covered Types of employees include all: • Field – going employees • Permanent, seasonal, and temporary employees • Volunteers according to their volunteer work agreement • Hosted and virtual employees • Teleworking employees Work Environments and Settings Work environments and settings include: Minimum Minimum Minimum host Available Work environment Situation employee supervisor unit tools/technology accountability accountability accountability Urban Office setting. No formal check Knows who is Low–tech white Working at in or check out in the office. board, front desk; duty station. required; status electronic in and recorded. out board; status boards; outlook calendar. Check out when Knows Office and Low tech white leaving office whereabouts of field setting. board, front desk; Urban and rural and check back employees. Able Leaving and electronic in and in when returning to confirm returning to out board; to duty station. return to duty duty station outlook calendar; Travel plan station. Knows 2 daily. identified; advise procedures if dispatch. if plan changes; employee does Additional check not check back ins may be in at end of day. required based on travel mode (snowmobile, ATV, boat, plane, helicopter). Check in and out with local field units. Lotus Notes Virtual Status Board; Knows the employees and No formal check Knows when status boards; whereabouts of Urban and rural (virtual teleworking. in or check out and where electronic in and virtual employees and telework) Working at a required; status employees are out board; working in their hosted unit or recorded. working. Outlook group office. at home. calendar; Communicator. Knows Check out when Multi–day whereabouts of leaving duty travel. In travel employees. Able station and when status–solo or to confirm arriving at travel group; return to duty Phone, email, cell Urban and rural destination. Daily populated station. Knows phone, radio check in not settings. procedures if required. Check Meetings and employee does in when return to training. not check back duty station. in at end of day. Check out when Working solo: Knows leaving duty Backcountry whereabouts of station with and remote employees. Able “travel plan.” field project to confirm daily Check in at set work. Multi- location and time “window” at day travel. final return to the beginning Working “off duty station. Radio, satellite, and end of each Backcountry and remote road.” Multiple Knows SPOT, SEND, shift; advise if travel methods procedures if cell phone; travel plans (boat, plane, employee does change; check in horse, hike, not check in at when return back ATV). established to duty station. Working timeframes and Additional alone. Field if employee check–in camp setting. does not return requirements back to duty may be required 3 based on travel station. mode (boat, plane, snowmobile, horse, ATV). Check out when leaving duty Working in station with crew: “travel plan.” Backcountry Check in at set and remote time “window” field project daily; advise if work. Multi– travel plans day travel. change; check in Working when return back Backcountry and remote “offroad.” to duty station. Multiple travel Additional check methods (boat, in may be plan, horse, required based on hike, ATV). travel mode Working in (horse, ATV, crew situation. boat, Field camp snowmobile, setting. plane, helicopter, hike). Check out when leaving duty Travel out of station and when country. Travel “leaving plans country.” Check coordinated in with duty and tracked station upon International Travel through IP and arrival to travel in–country destination. Daily safety officers. check in not Filed with Sate required. Check Department. in “in country” and when return to duty station. Utilize Utilize Law established established Enforcement check–out and Incident check–out and Incident and check–in Management or check–in Management/Emergency LE&I and Fire Investigations procedures, Emergency procedures, Response (LE&I ) and based on Response based on Fire assignment and assignment and location. Fire location. Fire resources at resources at 4 home unit, check home unit, check out and check in out and check in with dispatch with dispatch when they go on when they go on shift and off shift and off shift. LE&I shift. LE&I resources, check resources, check out and check in out and check in with dispatch and with dispatch and local law local law enforcement enforcement dispatch centers. dispatch centers. Follow Follow established established check–out and checkout and check–in check–in procedures when procedures when assigned to an assigned to an incident. incident. Working Alone Check–In Procedures Due to the increased risk when working alone, employees working alone should have additional check-in protocols. Employees working alone should carry a SPOT device if available. Employees should activate the tracking feature (footprint button) on the SPOT when they leave their place of lodging (duty station, hotel room, campsite, etc.) in the morning to begin traveling to plot(s). This feature will record location information once every 10 minutes and will continue to do so for up to 24 hours or when it is inactivated by the user. This feature will use a considerable amount of battery power, so employees need to carry additional batteries at all times and diligently observe indicator lights to ensure messages are being transmitted to avoid a false alarm. There is no external power source available and rechargeable batteries can damage the device. Employees will indicate if they are working alone and what method of transportation they are using (foot, motor vehicle, boat, plane, recreational off–highway vehicle, and so forth) when completing their check in or out. Availability and Status of Communication Systems and Equipment Communication systems and equipment include: FOREST RADIO SYSTEM Mobile Radios Each vehicle should have a mobile radio. If it does not, your supervisor will discuss the procedure for communications while traveling. When more than one person is in the vehicle, a passenger will use the radio. When you are the only one in the vehicle, find a place to safely get off the road and stop while talking. Mobile 5 radios are generally more powerful than handheld radios and may be more effective in areas with poor radio reception. Handheld radios It will be the responsibility of each employee to check with their supervisor to determine if a handheld radio is available for their use. If not and a mobile radio is not installed in the agency vehicle, the supervisor will ensure that check in/check out via cell phone is used through dispatch in accordance with the above stated process. These radios are very expensive and fragile and should be treated with the utmost care. Repeaters Propagation Maps (coverage maps) What to do if you do not have good radio reception from your work site: Good communications must be available while working in the field. If you have poor radio reception from your work site then you need to mitigate the situation by either setting up a human repeater or locating areas near by which do have good reception. These nearby areas should be easy to get to, easy to find, and made known to all crew members and the local unit office in case of an emergency. What to do if a Repeater is not working: If a repeater is down, first assure that the problem is with the repeater, not your radio or your location. Once you have confirmed that the problem lies with the repeater, the following process will be followed: 6 1. Let Dispatch know as soon as you can. You may need to move to another location to get in touch with the Dispatch. 2. Dispatch will let other field employees know that the repeater is not working, via an announcement over working repeaters (The announcement will be something like “Tonto NF Employees, please stand by for an announcement” [pause] “The ______Repeater is not working”). 3. Dispatch will let the radio coordinator know that the repeater is not working and the coordinator will inform CIO. Dispatch will email the Forest about the repeater status. 4. When the repeater is back in service, Dispatch will repeat Step 2, announcing that the repeater is back in service. Dispatch will also email the Forest of this resolution. 5. Use cell phone, if available, to contact Dispatch. Availability of Dispatch or Other Personnel Availability of dispatch and other personnel includes: Radio coverage and support from: 0700 – 1730 7 days per week, year round. Hours could change or be extended if circumstances arise. Dispatch will inform the Forest of any changes in hours of operation. Availability of Emergency Response Resources Availability of emergency response resources includes: If 911 is not available, all emergency response information is available through dispatch. Protocols The Tonto National Forest check-in and check-out program shall account for the location and safety of employees, virtual, hosted, and telework employees and volunteers with the following set of protocols. Definitions The program will adhere to these definitions: • In—Employee is at the regular duty station. • Out–to–Field—Going to the field, traveling on forest roads, or State or Federal highways. Give ETA when available. • Out–Telecommuting—At work, but from an alternate location in accordance with a telecommuting agreement. • Out–Fire—Employee is on fire assignment. • Out–Travel—Traveling off forest on State or Federal highways. • Off—Off duty. 7 Communications Equipment The required equipment includes: All field–going crews will carry a minimum of two communication devices (Forest Service radio, sat or cell phones, VHF radios, etc.) if they are all working in the same area and have visual contact with each other. If, however, they break into groups and visual contact is not maintained with each group, then each group needs at least one functioning communication device. At least one communication device shall be kept on or be functional between the hours of 0700 and 1730 for a communication link between Phoenix Interagency Dispatch Center (PIFC), and or the district and field–going crews. Employees will carry additional battery packs to ensure communication devices are operational throughout the workday. Crews going out into the field must make a communication device check from the compound before leaving for the field. This is to ensure that the communication device is working. The minimum required communication training includes: 1.Training and practice using the radio (i.e. radio etiquette). Have dispatch/someone with radio experience role play situation in which users can call in 2. Instruction on how to use TAC channels and how to get a repeater with practice 3. Training on how to put something on scan and take it off with practice 4. Familiarization on radio repeater guide. Responsibilities Employee’s responsibilities are to: • Receive training and have an understanding of the Check-In/Out Plan • Follow Check-In/Out procedures at all times • Understand how the radios, radio system, and/or cell phones work before going into the field • Have an extra radio battery and working vehicle cell phone charger. • Ensure assigned vehicle is in a well maintained, clean, and serviceable condition\ • Contact Phoenix dispatch on Admin frequency; either Channel 1 simplex, or Channel 2 repeater. These channels are the same on each of the 7 groups of frequencies: Group 1 – Cave Creek Ranger District Group 2 – Globe Ranger District Group 3 – Mesa Ranger District Group 4 – Payson Ranger District Group 5 – Pleasant Valley Ranger District Group 6 – Tonto Basin Ranger District Group 7 - Phoenix Interagency Fire Center Supervisor’s responsibilities are to: Assign a Designated Person (DP) when they will be unavailable and ensure all employees know who the DP is Ensure training is provided on the Check-In/Out Plan for all employees, i.e. safety meetings, etc…. Ensure all employees are following the Check-In/Out Plan Provide well maintained and serviced vehicles for employees to drive to their work location 8 Dispatch Responsibilities are to: Send dispatch phone# to all Tonto Employees ensuring notifications occur for main phone number 480-457- 1551, Toll Free Number 1-866-746-6516, 24 hour phone number 480-457-1555. Provide radio coverage from: 0700 – 1730, 7 days per week year round. Hours could change or be extended if circumstances arise. Dispatch will inform the Forest of any changes in hours of operation *Coordinate with Forest FMO/Forest Safety Officer on any incidents or issues that arise Overdue and missing response procedures include: OVERDUE EMPLOYEES An over-due employee is an employee that does not check-in 30 minutes after their designated check-in time and a reasonable attempt to contact the employee over the radio and/or by cell or satellite phone has been made with no success. Dispatch or supervisor (in after hour situations) responsibilities are to: • Check residence to make sure individual is not at home • Check with the employee’s unit to see if vehicle assigned to the employee and/or the employee’s personal vehicle is there • Notify the unit Line Officer • Notify Law Enforcement • Coordinate with other district employees to speed up an attempt to locate the employee • Continue attempting to make radio and/or phone contact with employee • Check last known field work location for employee or assigned vehicle MISSING EMPLOYEES The supervisor, unit Line Officer, Law Enforcement, and Dispatch will discuss if/when to declare the employee as missing, and if so, the appropriate actions to take thereafter. In the event that an employee is missing: Supervisor or DP responsibilities are to: • Inform unit Line Officer by radio, phone, or in person of areas already searched and the finding in those areas • Work with the County Sheriff’s Office and Search and Rescue resources • Staff front desk to provide communications and phone services until employee is located or the search is called off by the County Sheriff Unit Line Officer responsibilities are to: • Notify Law Enforcement 9 • Notify the responsible County Sheriff’s office of a missing employee and request Search and Rescue resources • Notify Dispatch and inform them of the situation • Coordinate with the County Sheriff’s office and Search and Rescue resources • Provide personnel and equipment assistance to the County Sheriff’s office and Search and Rescue resources as requested • Notify the missing employee’s family Weekend and Afterhours Protocol Employees will follow the primary check-in and check-out system on weekends and afterhours. Alternate procedures include: Weekend and Afterhours Protocol are the same as weekdays: 0700 – 1730 7 days per week, year round. Hours could change or be extended if circumstances arise. Dispatch will inform the Forest of any changes in hours of operation. Training Tonto National Forest employees, virtual, hosted, and telework employees, and volunteers must be properly instructed in the contents and use of the check-in and check-out program and system. Training will include: • Overview of the written check-in and check-out plan • Overview and demonstration of the primary check-in and check-out system • Overview and operation of communication equipment such as radios, SEND devices, and satellite phones Recordkeeping The Forest Safety Manager will keep a signed copy of the written plan. The Collateral Duty Safety Officers will keep the training documentation, such as names of participants, the agenda, and name of instructor. Program Evaluation The Tonto National Forest Radio Communications and Check-In/Check-Out Program will be reviewed on an annual basis for outdated information and ineffective procedures. If necessary, the plan will be updated and new signatures obtained. 10 Appendix F Tonto National Forest Travel Management Implementation Strategy Evaluation and Monitoring An example of the Coconino National Forest August 2013 Travel Management Monitoring Report can be found on the O drive: O:\NFS\Coconino\Program\7700TravelMgmt\MotorizedUseManagement\Monitoring 1 M onitoring D river Measurement Data E valuation/ Responsible Questions (applicable Frequency Source Reporting TM Implementation Monitoring Questions Driver Frequency* Strategy Team (applicable Member policy, Education desired How many Saturation Patrols, Understanding Ongoing Saturation Patrols Compile Annually District Recreation and Recreation Patrols, Hunter Patrols and how much District Recreation Patrols Law Enforcement Volunteer Clean up Days were exposure to TM Hunter Patrols Arizona Game and Fish scheduled, , , ,during , the year? the public is Volunteer Clean-up Days receiving through field based education contacts. Number of Hard Copy MVUM maps Understanding Ongoing Compile data from SO and Compile Annually PAO/Frontliners/ distributed at SO, District offices, how public is district offices on number of Roosevelt Lake Visitor Center and by acquiring MVUM’s distributed at each field contacts. MVUM’s for their office. use. Number of TM MVUM website visits. Compile data from SO and districts on number of MVUM’s Number of TM Interactive MVUM distributed through field website visits. contacts, saturation patrols, and counters for website visits, Number of MVUM downloads to Interactive MVUM and MVUM personal devices made from website. downloads on internet. What are the major concerns/ issues TMR and Forest Ongoing Comment card responses, TM Annually TM Implementation identified by Forest visitors? Plan language to web inquiries/counter, other Strategy Team Leader provide adequate Public/state/local and input rec opportunities from TM Implementation and minimize Task Force and TM User user conflict. Forum, if initiated. Where are these concerns/issues locatedT MR and F orest Ongoing Develop interactive mapping Annually. TM Implementation on the Forest? Plan langu age to platform to tag locations on an Strategy Team Leader provide interactive MVUM illustrating adequate rec location specific opportunities and minimize user issues/concerns conflic t. 2 Monitoring Driver Measurement Data Evaluation/ Responsible Questions (applicable Frequency Source Reporting TM Implementation policy, desired Frequency* Strategy Team conditions, Member Restoration/Protection Strategy and objective) Sign Plan What updates need to be made to the TMR policy to Ongoing Public Input, Input from FS Annually. Implementation MVUM to improve readability by re-publish employees, permittees, or others Strategy Team Leader correcting data errors/inconsistencies and MVUM each and comment forms reflect management decisions? year GIS Specialist What is the magnitude of motorized use Understanding Long term Install traffic counters on Annually – When Roads Data Steward on forest routes? patterns of monitoring identified routes. implemented in the motorized use item. long term Trails Data Steward on the Forest. (volume) Where are OHV use patterns occurring Understanding TM Implementation Long term Use of Google Map Technology Long term - on the Forest? changing Forest monitoring item Sample areas Strategy Team Leader OHV use identified on District Recreation patterns Specialists (demand) districts. 3 Monitoring Driver Measurement Data Evaluation/ Responsible Questions (applicable Frequency Source Reporting Implementation policy, desired Frequency* Team Member conditions, Restoration/Protection Strategy objective) Sign Plan (Continued) Are decommissioned routes meeting Forest Plan Ongoing Field surveys or satellite data or Annually on a Forest Hydrologist recovery objectives? guidance both sample of decommissioned Civil Engineering unauthorized routes Team Leader Number of miles of decommissioned Annual Engineering data. and designated Roads Data Steward routes. routes. Trails Data Steward Use 4FRI Monitoring Protocol when implementation decision is made for the Tonto National Forest. Number of Road and Trail Sign Route FSM and Off- Annually Sign Crew sign installation Annually Civil Engineering Markers installed. Highway log/database Team Leader Vehicle and Roads Data Steward Number of Portal signs installed on Program Route Trails Data Steward road entrances to the Forest and Area Forest Road and Trail Designation Sign Coordinators and/or Districts Number of Informational Kiosks Implementation constructed and installed. Guide Number of road and trail signs removed on routes not open under the new TM plan. 4 Monitoring Driver Measurement Data Evaluation/ Responsible TM Questions Frequency Source Reporting Implementation Team Enforcement Frequency* Member Enforcement Compliance Ongoing LEIMARS Database Records Annually. What is the level of unauthorized with MVUM -all incident reports and violation TM Implementation m otorized use? map notices Strategy Team Leader Number of Violations notices issued Arizona Game and Fish Patrol Captain Enforcement Database Records Where are there concentrations Coordination with AZ of unauthorized motorized use Develop Law enforcement layer Game and Fish Field (aka ‘hot spots’)? within the interactive MVUM Supervisor for Arizona mapping platform to tag Game and Fish Categories of unauthorized use: incident/violation notice enforcement data • Cross country travel within: locations. o the northern districts o the southern districts • Route not designated for motorized use or vehicle type: o Road/Admin Use o Non-motorized Trail o Single Track/General Motorized Use o The Arizona Trail 5 Monitoring Driver Measurement Data Evaluation/ Responsible Questions Frequency Source Reporting Implementation Evaluation Frequency* Team Member What are the effects of implementing Increase Long Term Random Patrols within OHV Annually. TM Implementation OHV areas? understanding monitoring item areas. District patrol, Saturation Strategy Team Leader of visitor use patrol, violation notice and and the impacts incident report data. Patrol Captain of OHV area management. District Specialists What are the effects of implementing Understanding Long Term Random Patrols within permit .Annually. TM Implementation permit zones? the effects of monitoring zones. Number of permits Strategy Team Leader permitted item. issued for each permit zone. motorized use. District patrol, Saturation patrol, Patrol Captain violation notice and incident report data. District Specialists What are the effects of designating Understanding Long Term Random corridor surveys. Site Annually. TM Implementation motorized dispersed camping corridors the effects of monitoring use data from District patrol and Strategy Team Leader or designating dispersed camp sites? dispersed item.. Saturation patrol data. camping Patrol Captain corridor designations and designated District Specialists dispersed What are the effects of designating Undecampsitesrstand ing Long Term Random corridor surveys. Site Annually TM Implementation motorized big game retrieval corridors? the effects of monitoring item.use data from District patrol, Strategy Team Leader motorized big Saturation patrol and hunter game retrieval patrol data. Patrol Captain corridors District Specialists What are the effects of designating Understanding Long Term Random corridor surveys within Annually TM Implementation motorized corridors within Fuelwood the effects of monitoring item.fuelwood permit areas. Use data Strategy Team Leader permit areas? corridor number of permits issued. District Non-recreation designations on Special Use fuelwood permit holders Administrators *All Actions identified will be compiled into the Annual Evaluation and Monitoring Report **Monitoring elements in grey are unlikely to occur without additional outside funding or volunteer assistance. These are items proposed to monitor in the long term and will be updated to reflect the Record of Decision when released. 6