The Universe at Z > 5

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 95, pp. 47–52, January 1998 Colloquium Paper This paper was presented at a colloquium entitled ‘‘The Age of the Universe, Dark Matter, and Structure Formation,’’ organized by David N. Schramm, held March 21–23, 1997, sponsored by the National Academy of Sciences at the Beckman Center in Irvine, CA. The universe at z > 5: When and how did the ‘‘dark age” end? MARTIN J. REES Institute of Astronomy, Madingley Road, Cambridge, CB3 OHA, United Kingdom ABSTRACT This paper considers how the first subgalac- We now know that at least some galaxies and quasars had tic structures produced the UV radiation that ionized the already formed by a billion years. But how much earlier did intergalactic medium before z 5 5 and the ‘‘feedback’’ effects structures form, and what were they like? of the UV radiation on structure formation. The first ‘‘pre- In most cosmological theories, especially those that postu- galaxies’’ may eventually be detectable by their direct UV late adiabatic Gaussian irregularities in the early universe, emission, with characteristic spectral features at Lyman a; quasars and large galaxies should thin out beyond z 5 5, but high-z supernovae may also be detectable. Other probes of the subgalactic structures may exist even at redshifts exceeding 10. intergalactic medium beyond z 5 5, and of the epochs of I shall discuss the effects of the earliest stars and supernovae— reheating and reionization, are discussed, along with possible production of UV radiation, nonuniform reheating of the links between the diffusion of pregalactic metals and the intergalactic medium (IGM), and the production of the first origin of magnetic fields. heavy elements—and the implications for observations at ultra-high redshifts. I shall discuss some potential observations The structures in our present universe are the outcome of more that can probe pregalactic era, telling us when the first energy than 10 billion years of evolution. Slight irregularities im- input occurred, and what scale of objects already existed at z . printed at very early eras led to increasing contrasts in the 5. But it may first be useful to summarize our theoretical density from place to place, until overdense regions evolved picture of how the first cosmic structure emerged. into bound structures. Quantitative and detailed (albeit spec- ulative) theories for the origin of the fluctuations (in an Clustering in Hierarchical Models ultra-early inflationary phase, or else as the outcome of topological defects, etc.) can now be tested against increasingly Characteristic Scales in Cold Dark Matter (CDM) Models. detailed and precise data. I will focus on the CDM model. But this is just a ‘‘template’’ The data are of two kinds. (i) CMB fluctuations probe for some more general deductions, which essentially apply to irregularities on scales relevant to observed cosmic structure any ‘‘bottom up’’ model for structure formation. There is no and on larger scales that are still in the linear regime. The minimum scale for the aggregation, under gravity, of cold detected photons have (according to most assumptions) prop- nonbaryonic matter. However, the baryons constitute a gas agated almost uninterruptedly since the recombination era, whose pressure opposes condensation on very small scales. when the universe had been expanding for less than a million Therefore, the gas does not ‘‘feel’’ the very smallest conden- years. (ii) The other line of evidence on cosmic structure comes sations. In the context relevant here, where the dark matter’s from traditional astronomy. Any acceptable theory must ac- gravity dominates, the baryonic Jeans mass is count for the present clustering properties of galaxies and dark 3 matter; it must also match the actual universe at all past eras V T 2 . 3 4S b DS g D M 5 10 MJ [1] that can be probed observationally. We have for some years J 0.025h2 T known about quasars with redshifts up to 5. Quasars them- rad selves may be associated with atypical (even exceptional) Only on scales larger than this can baryons promptly condense galaxies, so their intrinsic properties are hard to relate to the into bound systems, along with the dark matter. [The proviso general trend of galaxy formation. What has been especially ‘‘promptly’’ is nontrivial because, as emphasized by Loeb exciting about recent developments is that the morphology and (private communication), the baryons may be able to condense clustering of ordinary galaxies can now be probed out to similar later into smaller systems.] During the ‘‘dark age’’ the gas redshifts: the powerful combination of the Hubble Space became even cooler than the microwave background (i.e., Tg Telescope (HST) and the Keck Telescope has revealed many , Trad): if it had cooled adiabatically, with no heat input since galaxies at z . 3. Also, the absorption features in quasar 5 recombination, Tg would, at z 10, have been below 5 K. The spectra (the Lyman forest, etc.) probe the history of the ; smallest bound structures, with mass MJ, would have virial- clumping and temperature of a typical sample of the universe ized at a temperature a few times larger than Tg(z). Larger on galactic (and smaller) scales. masses would virialize at temperatures higher by a further 1y The mystery lies at still higher redshifts, between (in round y 2 5 5 factor (M MJ) . This virial temperature would be reached not numbers) a million years (z 1,000) and a billion years (z solely by adiabatic compression, but also because of a shock, 5). When the primordial radiation cooled below a few thou- which would typically occur before the radius had decreased by sand degrees, it shifted into the infrared. The universe then a factor of 2. entered a dark age, which continued until the first bound These virialized systems would, however, have a dull exis- structures formed, releasing gravitational or nuclear energy tence as stable clouds unless they could lose energy and deflate that lit up the universe again. How long did the ‘‘dark age’’ last? Abbreviations: IGM, intergalactic medium; CDM, cold dark matter; © 1998 by The National Academy of Sciences 0027-8424y98y9547-6$2.00y0 Mpc, million persec; NGST, New Generation Space Telescope; PNAS is available online at http:yywww.pnas.org. AGN(s), active galactic nucleus(i); yr, year. 47 Downloaded by guest on September 28, 2021 48 Colloquium Paper: Rees Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 (1998) due to atomic or molecular radiative processes—clouds that background intensity gets a boost, because the contributions couldn’t cool would simply remain in equilibrium, being later from remote regions (which dominate in Olbers-type integrals) incorporated in a larger scale of structure as the hierarchy built are less severely attenuated. The UV is then enough to up. On the other hand, clouds that can cool radiatively will maintain the very high mean ionization implied by transpar- deflate. Most cooling mechanisms are more efficient at higher ency of the IGM beyond the Lyman limit. This means that it temperatures, as well as at higher densities. Once collapse can maintain high ionization of a cloud until it has either starts, it proceeds almost isothermally, so that the internal collapsed to an overdensity exceeding the IGM ratio of ions to Jeans mass falls as the density rises. A virialized, self- neutrals or until it becomes self-shielding (which happens at gravitating cloud that can cool radiatively would eventually go more modest overdensities for large clouds). Until that hap- into free-fall collapse and (perhaps after a disc phase) frag- pens the cooling rate will be reduced by the lack of bound ment into smaller pieces. electrons and consequent elimination of the (otherwise dom- Three ‘‘cooling regimes’’ are relevant during successive inant) ‘‘line’’ contribution to the cooling. phases of the cosmogonic process, each being associated with When this third phase is reached, the thermal properties of a characteristic temperature. the uncollapsed gas will resemble those of the structures (i) For a H–He plasma the only effective cooling at low , 4 responsible for the observed Lyman–forest lines in high-z temperatures ( 10 K) comes from molecular hydrogen. Even quasars spectra—these are mainly filaments, draining into this process cuts off below a few hundred degrees; but above virialized systems. Such systems have velocity dispersions of 50 that temperature it allows contraction within the cosmic kmysec and are destined to turn into galaxies of the kind whose expansion timescale. The H fraction is never high, and it is, in 2 descendants are still recognizable. I shall return (section 4) to any case, not a very efficient coolant—indeed, systems that discuss the detectability of these early galaxies. collapse at z , 10 fail to form enough molecules for effective cooling [e.g., see figure 1 of Tegmark, et al. (1)]—but molec- Evidence for Diffuse Gas at High z ular cooling almost certainly played a role in forming the very first objects that lit up the universe CMB Fluctuations as a Probe of the Ionization Epoch. If the (ii)IfH is prevented from forming, so that molecular 2 intergalactic medium were suddenly reionized at a redshift z, cooling is ineffective, then a H–He mixture behaves adiabat- .. ically unless T is as high as 8,000–10,000°, when excitation of then the optical depth to Thomson scattering back to zi( 1) Lyman a by the Maxwellian tail of the electrons provides would be efficient cooling whose rate rises steeply with temperature. 3 1 1 z 2 V Because of this steep temperature dependence, gas in this t 5 21S iD S b D 0.05h 2 [2] regime contracts almost isothermally, so that its Jeans mass es 10 0.025h 2 decreases as the density rises.
Recommended publications
  • The Age of the Universe Transcript

    The Age of the Universe Transcript

    The Age of the Universe Transcript Date: Wednesday, 6 February 2013 - 1:00PM Location: Museum of London 6 February 2013 The Age of The Universe Professor Carolin Crawford Introduction The idea that the Universe might have an age is a relatively new concept, one that became recognised only during the past century. Even as it became understood that individual objects, such as stars, have finite lives surrounded by a birth and an end, the encompassing cosmos was always regarded as a static and eternal framework. The change in our thinking has underpinned cosmology, the science concerned with the structure and the evolution of the Universe as a whole. Before we turn to the whole cosmos then, let us start our story nearer to home, with the difficulty of solving what might appear a simpler problem, determining the age of the Earth. Age of the Earth The fact that our planet has evolved at all arose predominantly from the work of 19th century geologists, and in particular, the understanding of how sedimentary rocks had been set down as an accumulation of layers over extraordinarily long periods of time. The remains of creatures trapped in these layers as fossils clearly did not resemble any currently living, but there was disagreement about how long a time had passed since they had died. The cooling earth The first attempt to age the Earth based on physics rather than geology came from Lord Kelvin at the end of the 19th Century. Assuming that the whole planet would have started from a completely molten state, he then calculated how long it would take for the surface layers of Earth to cool to their present temperature.
  • Hubble's Law and the Expanding Universe

    Hubble's Law and the Expanding Universe

    COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Hubble’s Law and the expanding universe Neta A. Bahcall1 the expansion rate is constant in all direc- Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 tions at any given time, this rate changes with time throughout the life of the uni- verse. When expressed as a function of cos- In one of the most famous classic papers presented the observational evidence for one H t in the annals of science, Edwin Hubble’s of science’s greatest discoveries—the expand- mic time, ( ), it is known as the Hubble 1929 PNAS article on the observed relation inguniverse.Hubbleshowedthatgalaxiesare Parameter. The expansion rate at the pres- between distance and recession velocity of receding away from us with a velocity that is ent time, Ho, is about 70 km/s/Mpc (where 1 Mpc = 106 parsec = 3.26 × 106 light-y). galaxies—the Hubble Law—unveiled the proportional to their distance from us: more The inverse of the Hubble Constant is the expanding universe and forever changed our distant galaxies recede faster than nearby gal- Hubble Time, tH = d/v = 1/H ; it reflects understanding of the cosmos. It inaugurated axies. Hubble’s classic graph of the observed o the time since a linear cosmic expansion has the field of observational cosmology that has velocity vs. distance for nearby galaxies is begun (extrapolating a linear Hubble Law uncovered an amazingly vast universe that presented in Fig. 1; this graph has become back to time t = 0); it is thus related to has been expanding and evolving for 14 bil- a scientific landmark that is regularly repro- the age of the Universe from the Big-Bang lion years and contains dark matter, dark duced in astronomy textbooks.
  • The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abstract 1

    The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abstract 1

    David Goodstein’s Cosmology Book The Reionization of Cosmic Hydrogen by the First Galaxies Abraham Loeb Department of Astronomy, Harvard University, 60 Garden St., Cambridge MA, 02138 Abstract Cosmology is by now a mature experimental science. We are privileged to live at a time when the story of genesis (how the Universe started and developed) can be critically explored by direct observations. Looking deep into the Universe through powerful telescopes, we can see images of the Universe when it was younger because of the finite time it takes light to travel to us from distant sources. Existing data sets include an image of the Universe when it was 0.4 million years old (in the form of the cosmic microwave background), as well as images of individual galaxies when the Universe was older than a billion years. But there is a serious challenge: in between these two epochs was a period when the Universe was dark, stars had not yet formed, and the cosmic microwave background no longer traced the distribution of matter. And this is precisely the most interesting period, when the primordial soup evolved into the rich zoo of objects we now see. The observers are moving ahead along several fronts. The first involves the construction of large infrared telescopes on the ground and in space, that will provide us with new photos of the first galaxies. Current plans include ground-based telescopes which are 24-42 meter in diameter, and NASA’s successor to the Hubble Space Telescope, called the James Webb Space Telescope. In addition, several observational groups around the globe are constructing radio arrays that will be capable of mapping the three-dimensional distribution of cosmic hydrogen in the infant Universe.
  • Galaxies at High Redshift Mauro Giavalisco

    Galaxies at High Redshift Mauro Giavalisco

    eaa.iop.org DOI: 10.1888/0333750888/1669 Galaxies at High Redshift Mauro Giavalisco From Encyclopedia of Astronomy & Astrophysics P. Murdin © IOP Publishing Ltd 2006 ISBN: 0333750888 Institute of Physics Publishing Bristol and Philadelphia Downloaded on Thu Mar 02 23:08:45 GMT 2006 [131.215.103.76] Terms and Conditions Galaxies at High Redshift E NCYCLOPEDIA OF A STRONOMY AND A STROPHYSICS Galaxies at High Redshift that is progressively higher for objects that are separated in space by larger distances. If the recession velocity between Galaxies at high REDSHIFT are very distant galaxies and, two objects is small compared with the speed of light, since light propagates through space at a finite speed of its value is directly proportional to the distance between approximately 300 000 km s−1, they appear to an observer them, namely v = H d on the Earth as they were in a very remote past, when r 0 the light departed them, carrying information on their H properties at that time. Observations of objects with very where the constant of proportionality 0 is called the high redshifts play a central role in cosmology because ‘HUBBLE CONSTANT’. For larger recession velocities this they provide insight into the epochs and the mechanisms relation is replaced by a more general one calculated from the theory of general relativity. In each cases, the value of GALAXY FORMATION, if one can reach redshifts that are high H enough to correspond to the cosmic epochs when galaxies of 0 provides the recession velocity of a pair of galaxies were forming their first populations of stars and began to separated by unitary distance, and hence sets the rate of shine light throughout space.
  • The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps

    The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps

    The Anthropic Principle and Multiple Universe Hypotheses Oren Kreps Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1: The Fine-Tuning Argument and the Anthropic Principle .............................................. 3 The Improbability of a Life-Sustaining Universe ....................................................................... 3 Does God Explain Fine-Tuning? ................................................................................................ 4 The Anthropic Principle .............................................................................................................. 7 The Multiverse Premise ............................................................................................................ 10 Three Classes of Coincidence ................................................................................................... 13 Can The Existence of Sapient Life Justify the Multiverse? ...................................................... 16 How unlikely is fine-tuning? .................................................................................................... 17 Section 2: Multiverse Theories ..................................................................................................... 18 Many universes or all possible
  • Year 1 Cosmology Results from the Dark Energy Survey

    Year 1 Cosmology Results from the Dark Energy Survey

    Year 1 Cosmology Results from the Dark Energy Survey Elisabeth Krause on behalf of the Dark Energy Survey collaboration TeVPA 2017, Columbus OH Our Simple Universe On large scales, the Universe can be modeled with remarkably few parameters age of the Universe geometry of space density of atoms density of matter amplitude of fluctuations scale dependence of fluctuations [of course, details often not quite as simple] Our Puzzling Universe Ordinary Matter “Dark Energy” accelerates the expansion 5% dominates the total energy density smoothly distributed 25% acceleration first measured by SN 1998 “Dark Matter” 70% Our Puzzling Universe Ordinary Matter “Dark Energy” accelerates the expansion 5% dominates the total energy density smoothly distributed 25% acceleration first measured by SN 1998 “Dark Matter” next frontier: understand cosmological constant Λ: w ≡P/ϱ=-1? 70% magnitude of Λ very surprising dynamic dark energy varying in time and space, w(a)? breakdown of GR? Theoretical Alternatives to Dark Energy Many new DE/modified gravity theories developed over last decades Most can be categorized based on how they break GR: The only local, second-order gravitational field equations that can be derived from a four-dimensional action that is constructed solely from the metric tensor, and admitting Bianchi identities, are GR + Λ. Lovelock’s theorem (1969) [subject to viability conditions] Theoretical Alternatives to Dark Energy Many new DE/modified gravity theories developed over last decades Most can be categorized based on how they break GR: The only local, second-order gravitational field equations that can be derived from a four-dimensional action that is constructed solely from the metric tensor, and admitting Bianchi identities, are GR + Λ.
  • Cosmic Microwave Background

    Cosmic Microwave Background

    1 29. Cosmic Microwave Background 29. Cosmic Microwave Background Revised August 2019 by D. Scott (U. of British Columbia) and G.F. Smoot (HKUST; Paris U.; UC Berkeley; LBNL). 29.1 Introduction The energy content in electromagnetic radiation from beyond our Galaxy is dominated by the cosmic microwave background (CMB), discovered in 1965 [1]. The spectrum of the CMB is well described by a blackbody function with T = 2.7255 K. This spectral form is a main supporting pillar of the hot Big Bang model for the Universe. The lack of any observed deviations from a 7 blackbody spectrum constrains physical processes over cosmic history at redshifts z ∼< 10 (see earlier versions of this review). Currently the key CMB observable is the angular variation in temperature (or intensity) corre- lations, and to a growing extent polarization [2–4]. Since the first detection of these anisotropies by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) satellite [5], there has been intense activity to map the sky at increasing levels of sensitivity and angular resolution by ground-based and balloon-borne measurements. These were joined in 2003 by the first results from NASA’s Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)[6], which were improved upon by analyses of data added every 2 years, culminating in the 9-year results [7]. In 2013 we had the first results [8] from the third generation CMB satellite, ESA’s Planck mission [9,10], which were enhanced by results from the 2015 Planck data release [11, 12], and then the final 2018 Planck data release [13, 14]. Additionally, CMB an- isotropies have been extended to smaller angular scales by ground-based experiments, particularly the Atacama Cosmology Telescope (ACT) [15] and the South Pole Telescope (SPT) [16].
  • Arxiv:2002.11464V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph] 13 Feb 2020 a Function of the Angles Θ and Φ in the Sky Is Shown in Fig

    Arxiv:2002.11464V1 [Physics.Gen-Ph] 13 Feb 2020 a Function of the Angles Θ and Φ in the Sky Is Shown in Fig

    Flat Space, Dark Energy, and the Cosmic Microwave Background Kevin Cahill Department of Physics and Astronomy University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico 87106 (Dated: February 27, 2020) This paper reviews some of the results of the Planck collaboration and shows how to compute the distance from the surface of last scattering, the distance from the farthest object that will ever be observed, and the maximum radius of a density fluctuation in the plasma of the CMB. It then explains how these distances together with well-known astronomical facts imply that space is flat or nearly flat and that dark energy is 69% of the energy of the universe. I. COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND RADIATION The cosmic microwave background (CMB) was predicted by Gamow in 1948 [1], estimated to be at a temperature of 5 K by Alpher and Herman in 1950 [2], and discovered by Penzias and Wilson in 1965 [3]. It has been observed in increasing detail by Roll and Wilkinson in 1966 [4], by the Cosmic Background Explorer (COBE) collaboration in 1989{1993 [5, 6], by the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) collaboration in 2001{2013 [7, 8], and by the Planck collaboration in 2009{2019 [9{12]. The Planck collaboration measured CMB radiation at nine frequencies from 30 to 857 6 GHz by using a satellite at the Lagrange point L2 in the Earth's shadow some 1.5 10 km × farther from the Sun [11, 12]. Their plot of the temperature T (θ; φ) of the CMB radiation as arXiv:2002.11464v1 [physics.gen-ph] 13 Feb 2020 a function of the angles θ and φ in the sky is shown in Fig.
  • Lecture 14: the Age of the Universe

    Lecture 14: the Age of the Universe

    The Age of the Universe One somewhat low-pro¯le but important test of cosmological models is that the age of the universe implied by the models agrees with the age estimated using various methods. Here we'll talk about the age we get from models, and in the next lecture will discuss several observational handles on the true age. For a change of pace, and to give us some practice in evaluating complicated equations, we will start with the equation for the lookback time provided by Hogg in astro-ph/9905116, and see whether the units, limits, etc. make sense. The lookback time from now (z = 0) back to redshift z means the time that would have elapsed on the wristwatch of an observer moving with the Hubble ow between those redshifts. Hogg's expression is: 1 z dz0 tL = 0 0 3 0 2 : (1) H0 Z0 (1 + z ) ­(1 + z ) + ­k(1 + z ) + ­¤ p Here H0 is the current value of the Hubble parameter, and ­, ­k, and ­¤ each indicate their current (z = 0) values. Does this expression behave as it should? See Figure 1 for a graphical representation. As always, we check units ¯rst. Recall that the Hubble parameter has units of inverse time, so the prefactor 1=H0 has units of time. The integral is dimensionless because the redshift is, so indeed the units are correct. Our second easy check is to note that tL must increase with increasing z. Since the integrand is always positive, this is indeed the case. Our third simple check is to note that smaller H0 should imply a larger time back to a given redshift, because H0 = a=a_ today.
  • The Hubble Constant

    The Hubble Constant

    Astro-2: History of the Universe Lecture 3; April 11 2013 Previously.. On Astro-2 • The universe is much larger than the Milky Way (Gpc vs kpc) • There are billion of galaxies, the Milky Way is average Joe galaxy • Most galaxies can be classified based on their appearance as – Elliptical – Lenticular – Spiral – Irregular • Spirals rotate and have young stars, gas and dust • Ellipticals do not rotate and have old stars, no gas nor dust Previously.. On Astro-2 • It is difficult but very important to figure out the size and distance of things in the universe • One way astronomers do that is by using “standard candles”. • Examples of standard candles are cepheids variable stars and supernovae Two important questions • Are there black holes in galaxies? • What is a black hole? Two important questions • How do we know it? • Exactly in the same way we know the mass of the sun, or the mass of galaxies for that matter! Two important questions • If the universe is homogeneous and isotropic how do stars know that there is a center of a galaxy to orbit around? • It is a matter of scale: • On scale much larger than a Mpc the universe is homogeneous • On scales much smaller than a Mpc the universe is NOT homogenous, there are galaxies, for example. Assignments. Due Friday 4/19 4PM 1. To TA: Universe 24.42 - 24.43 - 24.45 2. On your own: 24.17 thru 24.30 Today.. On Astro-2 1. How far are galaxies? 2. Measuring velocities and “redshifts”. 3. Hubble’s law.
  • 22. Big-Bang Cosmology

    22. Big-Bang Cosmology

    1 22. Big-Bang Cosmology 22. Big-Bang Cosmology Revised August 2019 by K.A. Olive (Minnesota U.) and J.A. Peacock (Edinburgh U.). 22.1 Introduction to Standard Big-Bang Model The observed expansion of the Universe [1–3] is a natural (almost inevitable) result of any homogeneous and isotropic cosmological model based on general relativity. However, by itself, the Hubble expansion does not provide sufficient evidence for what we generally refer to as the Big-Bang model of cosmology. While general relativity is in principle capable of describing the cosmology of any given distribution of matter, it is extremely fortunate that our Universe appears to be homogeneous and isotropic on large scales. Together, homogeneity and isotropy allow us to extend the Copernican Principle to the Cosmological Principle, stating that all spatial positions in the Universe are essentially equivalent. The formulation of the Big-Bang model began in the 1940s with the work of George Gamow and his collaborators, Ralph Alpher and Robert Herman. In order to account for the possibility that the abundances of the elements had a cosmological origin, they proposed that the early Universe was once very hot and dense (enough so as to allow for the nucleosynthetic processing of hydrogen), and has subsequently expanded and cooled to its present state [4,5]. In 1948, Alpher and Herman predicted that a direct consequence of this model is the presence of a relic background radiation with a temperature of order a few K [6,7]. Of course this radiation was observed 16 years later as the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) [8].
  • The Problem of the Age of the Universe and the Earliest Galaxies

    The Problem of the Age of the Universe and the Earliest Galaxies

    The Problem of the Age of the Universe and the Earliest Galaxies Roger Ellman Abstract A number of years ago the estimates of astronomers and astrophysicists were that the earliest galaxies took about 2½ - 3 billion years to form, that is, that they did not appear until 2.5-3.0 billion years after the Big Bang. Those estimates were based on analysis of the processes involved in star formation and in the aggregation and “clumping” of matter in the early universe. Since then improved equipment and techniques [e.g. Keck and Hubble telescopes and gravitational lensing] have resulted in reports of observation of early galaxies having stars that formed as early as 300 million years after the Big Bang. Such new data has led to the abandonment of the several billion years estimates of the time required for star and galaxy formation; however, an alternative response to the data would be to re-examine the Hubble theory from which the age of the universe and the distance to high redshift objects is determined. Roger Ellman, The-Origin Foundation, Inc. 320 Gemma Circle, Santa Rosa, CA 95404, USA [email protected] http://www.The-Origin.org 1 The Problem of the Age of the Universe and the Earliest Galaxies Roger Ellman Background of the Problem A number of years ago the estimates of astronomers and astrophysicists were that the earliest galaxies took about 2½ - 3 billion years to form, that is, that they did not appear until 2.5-3.0 billion years after the Big Bang. Those estimates were based on analysis of the processes involved in star formation and in the aggregation and “clumping” of matter in the early universe.