DOCSLIB.ORG

Magnetic Monopole Search with the Full Moedal Trapping Detector in 13 Tev Pp Collisions Interpreted in Photon-Fusion and Drell-Yan Production

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Magnetic Monopole Search with the Full Moedal Trapping Detector in 13 Tev Pp Collisions Interpreted in Photon-Fusion and Drell-Yan Production PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 021802 (2019) Magnetic Monopole Search with the Full MoEDAL Trapping Detector in 13 TeV pp Collisions Interpreted in Photon-Fusion and Drell-Yan Production B. Acharya,1,* J. Alexandre,1 S. Baines,1 P. Benes,2 B. Bergmann,2 J. Bernab´eu,3 A. Bevan,4 H. Branzas,5 M. Campbell,6 † ‡ S. Cecchini,7 Y. M. Cho,8, M. de Montigny,9 A. De Roeck,6 J. R. Ellis,1,10, M. El Sawy,6,§ M. Fairbairn,1 D. Felea,5 M. Frank,11 J. Hays,4 A. M. Hirt,12 J. Janecek,2 D.-W. Kim,13 A. Korzenev,14 D. H. Lacarr`ere,6 S. C. Lee,13 C. Leroy,15 G. Levi,16 A. Lionti,14 J. Mamuzic,3 A. Margiotta,16 N. Mauri,7 N. E. Mavromatos,1 P. Mermod,14 M. Mieskolainen,17 ∥ L. Millward,4 V. A. Mitsou,3, R. Orava,17 I. Ostrovskiy,18 J. Papavassiliou,3 B. Parker,19 L. Patrizii,7 G. E. Pav˘ ala˘ ş,5 J. L. Pinfold,9 V. Popa,5 M. Pozzato,7 S. Pospisil,2 A. Rajantie,20 R. Ruiz de Austri,3 Z. Sahnoun,7,¶ M. Sakellariadou,1 A. Santra,3 S. Sarkar,1 G. Semenoff,21 A. Shaa,9 G. Sirri,7 K. Sliwa,22 R. Soluk,9 M. Spurio,16 M. Staelens,9 M. Suk,2 M. Tenti,23 V. Togo,7 J. A. Tuszyński,9 V. Vento,3 O. Vives,3 Z. Vykydal,2 A. Wall,18 and I. S. Zgura5 (MoEDAL Collaboration) 1Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology Group, Physics Department, King’s College London, United Kingdom 2IEAP, Czech Technical University in Prague, Czech Republic 3IFIC, Universitat de Val`encia—CSIC, Valencia, Spain 4School of Physics and Astronomy, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom 5Institute of Space Science, Bucharest—Magurele,˘ Romania 6Experimental Physics Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 7INFN, Section of Bologna, Bologna, Italy 8Physics Department, Konkuk University, Seoul, Korea 9Physics Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada 10Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 11Department of Physics, Concordia University, Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, Canada 12Department of Earth Sciences, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Zurich, Switzerland—Associate member 13Physics Department, Gangneung-Wonju National University, Gangneung, Republic of Korea 14D´epartement de Physique Nucl´eaire et Corpusculaire, Universit´e de Gen`eve, Geneva, Switzerland 15D´epartement de Physique, Universit´e de Montr´eal, Qu´ebec, Canada 16INFN, Section of Bologna and Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Bologna, Italy 17Physics Department, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland 18Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, Alabama, USA 19Institute for Research in Schools, Canterbury, United Kingdom 20Department of Physics, Imperial College London, United Kingdom 21Department of Physics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada 22Department of Physics and Astronomy, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts, USA 23INFN, CNAF, Bologna, Italy (Received 21 March 2019; published 9 July 2019) MoEDAL is designed to identify new physics in the form of stable or pseudostable highly ionizing particles produced in high-energy Large Hadron Collider (LHC) collisions. Here we update our previous search for magnetic monopoles in Run 2 using the full trapping detector with almost four times more material and almost twice more integrated luminosity. For the first time at the LHC, the data were interpreted in terms of photon-fusion monopole direct production in addition to the Drell-Yan-like mechanism. The MoEDAL trapping detector, consisting of 794 kg of aluminum samples installed in the forward and lateral regions, was exposed to 4.0 fb−1 of 13 TeV proton-proton collisions at the LHCb interaction point and analyzed by searching for induced persistent currents after passage through a superconducting magnetometer. Magnetic charges equal to or above the Dirac charge are excluded in all samples. Monopole spins 0, ½, and 1 are considered and both velocity-independent and-dependent Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI. Funded by SCOAP3. 0031-9007=19=123(2)=021802(7) 021802-1 Published by the American Physical Society PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 021802 (2019) couplings are assumed. This search provides the best current laboratory constraints for monopoles with magnetic charges ranging from two to five times the Dirac charge. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.021802 The existence of a magnetically charged particle would more detail in Ref. [23]. The first method adds measure- add symmetry to Maxwell’s equations and explain why ments performed at 1 mm intervals using a dipole sample of electric charge is quantized in nature, as shown by Dirac in known magnetic moment μ ¼ 2.98 × 10−6 Am2 to obtain 1931 [1]. Dirac predicted the fundamental magnetic charge the response of a single magnetic pole of strength ð 2α Þ ≃ 68 5 5 number (or Dirac charge) to be e= em . e where e P ¼ 9.03 × 10 g , based on the superposition principle. α D is the proton charge and em is the fine-structure constant. The second method measures directly the effect of a Consequently, in SI units, the magnetic charge can be magnetic pole of known strength using a long thin solenoid ¼ written in terms of the dimensionless quantity gD as qm providing P ¼ 32.4gD=μA for various currents ranging ngDec where n is an integer number and c is the speed of from 0.01 to 10 μA. The results of the calibration mea- light in vacuum. Because gD is large, a fast monopole can surements, with the calibration constant obtained from the induce ionization in matter thousands of times higher than a first method, are shown in Fig. 1. The two methods agree particle carrying the elementary electric charge. within 10%, which can be considered as the calibration It has subsequently been shown by ’t Hooft and uncertainty in the pole strength. The magnetometer Polyakov that the existence of the monopole as a topo- response is measured to be linear and charge symmetric logical soliton is a prediction of theories of the unifica- in a range corresponding to 0.3–300g . The plateau value 16 D tion of forces [2–5]. For a unification scale of 10 GeV of the calibration dipole sample was remeasured regularly such monopoles would have a mass M in the range during the campaign and was found to be stable to within 17 18 10 –10 GeV. In unification theories involving a number less than 1%. of symmetry-breaking scales [6–8], monopoles of much Samples were placed on a carbon-fiber movable con- lower mass can arise, although still beyond the reach of the veyer tray for transport through the sensing region of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC). However, an electroweak magnetometer, three at a time, separated by a distance of monopole has been proposed [9–12] that is a hybrid of the 46 cm. The transport speed was set to the minimum Dirac and ’t Hooft–Polyakov monopoles [2,3] with a mass available of 2.54 cm=s, as it was found in previous studies potentially accessible at the LHC and a minimum magnetic that the frequency and magnitude of possible spurious 2 charge gD, underlining the importance of searching for offsets increased with speed [21]. The magnetic charge large magnetic charges at the LHC. contained in a sample is measured as a persistent current in There have been extensive searches for monopole relics the superconducting coil surrounding the transport axis. from the early Universe in cosmic rays and in materials This is defined as the difference between the currents [13,14]. The LHC has a comprehensive monopole search measured after (I2) and before (I1) passage of a sample program using various techniques devised to probe TeV- scale monopole masses for the first time [15–17]. The results obtained by MoEDAL using 8 TeV pp collisions allowed the previous LHC constraints on monopole pair production [18] to be improved to provide limits on monopoles with jgj ≤ 3gD and M ≤ 3500 GeV [19], where ¼ g qmec. At 13 TeV LHC energies, MoEDAL extended the limits to jgj ≤ 5gD and masses up to 1790 GeV assuming Drell-Yan (DY) production [20,21]. In addition to the forward part used in previous analyses [20,21], the exposed Magnetic Monopole Trapper (MMT) volume analyzed here includes lateral components increas- ing the total aluminum mass to 794 kg; a schematic view is provided in the Supplemental Material [22]. All 2400 trapping detector samples were scanned in 2018 with a dc SQUID long-core magnetometer (2G Enterprises Model FIG. 1. Results of the calibration measurements with the 755) installed at the Laboratory for Natural Magnetism at superposition method using a magnetic dipole sample and ETH Zurich. The measured magnetometer response is the solenoid method with P ¼ 32.4gD=μA and various currents. translated into a magnetic pole P in units of Dirac charge The dashed lines represent the expected plateau values in units of by multiplying by a calibration constant C. Calibration was Dirac charge. The calibration constant is tuned using the performed using two independent methods, described in measurement from the superposition method. 021802-2 PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS 123, 021802 (2019) FIG. 2. Magnetic pole strength (in units of Dirac charge) measured in the 2400 aluminum samples of the MoEDAL trapping detector exposed to 13 TeV collisions in 2015–2017, with every sample scanned twice. FIG. 3. Results of multiple pole strength measurements (in units of Dirac charge) for the 87 candidate samples for which at through the sensing coil, after adjustment for the corre- least one of the two first measurement values was above the tray tray threshold jgj > 0.4g .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Followed by a Stretcher That Fits Into the Same
    as the booster; the main synchro­ what cheaper because some ex­ tunnel (this would require comple­ tron taking the beam to the final penditure on buildings and general mentary funding beyond the normal energy; followed by a stretcher infrastructure would be saved. CERN budget); and at the Swiss that fits into the same tunnel as In his concluding remarks, SIN Laboratory. Finally he pointed the main ring of circumference 960 F. Scheck of Mainz, chairman of out that it was really one large m (any resemblance to existing the EHF Study Group, pointed out community of future users, not presently empty tunnels is not that the physics case for EHF was three, who were pushing for a unintentional). Bradamante pointed well demonstrated, that there was 'kaon factory'. Whoever would be out that earlier criticisms are no a strong and competent European first to obtain approval, the others longer valid. The price seems un­ physics community pushing for it, would beat a path to his door. der control, the total investment and that there were good reasons National decisions on the project for a 'green pasture' version for building it in Europe. He also will be taken this year. amounting to about 870 million described three site options: a Deutschmarks. A version using 'green pasture' version in Italy; at By Florian Scheck existing facilities would be some- CERN using the now defunct ISR A ZEUS group meeting, with spokesman Gunter Wolf one step in front of the pack. (Photo DESY) The HERA electron-proton collider now being built at the German DESY Laboratory in Hamburg will be a unique physics tool.
    [Show full text]
  • The Moedal Experiment at the LHC. Searching Beyond the Standard
    126 EPJ Web of Conferences , 02024 (2016) DOI: 10.1051/epjconf/201612602024 ICNFP 2015 The MoEDAL experiment at the LHC Searching beyond the standard model James L. Pinfold (for the MoEDAL Collaboration)1,a 1 University of Alberta, Physics Department, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 0V1, Canada Abstract. MoEDAL is a pioneering experiment designed to search for highly ionizing avatars of new physics such as magnetic monopoles or massive (pseudo-)stable charged particles. Its groundbreaking physics program defines a number of scenarios that yield potentially revolutionary insights into such foundational questions as: are there extra dimensions or new symmetries; what is the mechanism for the generation of mass; does magnetic charge exist; what is the nature of dark matter; and, how did the big-bang develop. MoEDAL’s purpose is to meet such far-reaching challenges at the frontier of the field. The innovative MoEDAL detector employs unconventional methodologies tuned to the prospect of discovery physics. The largely passive MoEDAL detector, deployed at Point 8 on the LHC ring, has a dual nature. First, it acts like a giant camera, comprised of nuclear track detectors - analyzed offline by ultra fast scanning microscopes - sensitive only to new physics. Second, it is uniquely able to trap the particle messengers of physics beyond the Standard Model for further study. MoEDAL’s radiation environment is monitored by a state-of-the-art real-time TimePix pixel detector array. A new MoEDAL sub-detector to extend MoEDAL’s reach to millicharged, minimally ionizing, particles (MMIPs) is under study Finally we shall describe the next step for MoEDAL called Cosmic MoEDAL, where we define a very large high altitude array to take the search for highly ionizing avatars of new physics to higher masses that are available from the cosmos.
    [Show full text]
  • EPS-HEP 2017 Report of Contributions
    EPS-HEP 2017 Report of Contributions https://indico.cern.ch/e/epshep2017 EPS-HEP 2017 / Report of Contributions Theory overview on FCNC B-decays Contribution ID: 10 Type: Parallel Talk Theory overview on FCNC B-decays Thursday, 6 July 2017 09:00 (30 minutes) LHCb experiment at CERN has recently reported a set of measurements on lepton flavour univer- sality in b to s transitions showing a departure from the Standard Model predictions. I will review the main ideas recently put forward to make sense out of these intriguing hints. Focusing on the new physics explanation, I will discuss the correlated signals expected in other low- and high- energy observables, that could help clarify the mysterious signal. Experimental Collaboration Primary author: GRELJO, Admir (University of Zurich) Presenter: GRELJO, Admir (University of Zurich) Session Classification: Flavour and symmetries Track Classification: Flavour Physics and Fundamental Symmetries October 6, 2021 Page 1 EPS-HEP 2017 / Report of Contributions Charm Quark Mass with Calibrate … Contribution ID: 11 Type: Parallel Talk Charm Quark Mass with Calibrated Uncertainty Friday, 7 July 2017 12:35 (13 minutes) We determine the charm quark mass mc(mc) from QCD sum rules of moments of the vector cur- rent correlator calculated in perturbative QCD. Only experimental data for the charm resonances below the continuum threshold are needed in our approach, while the continuum contribution is determined by requiring self-consistency between various sum rules, including the one for the ze- roth moment. Existing data from the continuum region can then be used to bound the theoretical error. Our result is mc(mc) = 1272 ± 8 MeV for αs(MZ ) = 0:1182.
    [Show full text]
  • Accelerator Search of the Magnetic Monopo
    Accelerator Based Magnetic Monopole Search Experiments (Overview) Vasily Dzhordzhadze, Praveen Chaudhari∗, Peter Cameron, Nicholas D’Imperio, Veljko Radeka, Pavel Rehak, Margareta Rehak, Sergio Rescia, Yannis Semertzidis, John Sondericker, and Peter Thieberger. Brookhaven National Laboratory ABSTRACT We present an overview of accelerator-based searches for magnetic monopoles and we show why such searches are important for modern particle physics. Possible properties of monopoles are reviewed as well as experimental methods used in the search for them at accelerators. Two types of experimental methods, direct and indirect are discussed. Finally, we describe proposed magnetic monopole search experiments at RHIC and LHC. Content 1. Magnetic Monopole characteristics 2. Experimental techniques 3. Monopole Search experiments 4. Magnetic Monopoles in virtual processes 5. Future experiments 6. Summary 1. Magnetic Monopole characteristics The magnetic monopole puzzle remains one of the fundamental and unsolved problems in physics. This problem has a along history. The military engineer Pierre de Maricourt [1] in1269 was breaking magnets, trying to separate their poles. P. Curie assumed the existence of single magnetic poles [2]. A real breakthrough happened after P. Dirac’s approach to the solution of the electron charge quantization problem [3]. Before Dirac, J. Maxwell postulated his fundamental laws of electrodynamics [4], which represent a complete description of all known classical electromagnetic phenomena. Together with the Lorenz force law and the Newton equations of motion, they describe all the classical dynamics of interacting charged particles and electromagnetic fields. In analogy to electrostatics one can add a magnetic charge, by introducing a magnetic charge density, thus magnetic fields are no longer due solely to the motion of an electric charge and in Maxwell equation a magnetic current will appear in analogy to the electric current.
    [Show full text]
  • An Analysis on Single and Central Diffractive Heavy Flavour Production at Hadron Colliders
    416 Brazilian Journal of Physics, vol. 38, no. 3B, September, 2008 An Analysis on Single and Central Diffractive Heavy Flavour Production at Hadron Colliders M. V. T. Machado Universidade Federal do Pampa, Centro de Cienciasˆ Exatas e Tecnologicas´ Campus de Bage,´ Rua Carlos Barbosa, CEP 96400-970, Bage,´ RS, Brazil (Received on 20 March, 2008) In this contribution results from a phenomenological analysis for the diffractive hadroproduction of heavy flavors at high energies are reported. Diffractive production of charm, bottom and top are calculated using the Regge factorization, taking into account recent experimental determination of the diffractive parton density functions in Pomeron by the H1 Collaboration at DESY-HERA. In addition, multiple-Pomeron corrections are considered through the rapidity gap survival probability factor. We give numerical predictions for single diffrac- tive as well as double Pomeron exchange (DPE) cross sections, which agree with the available data for diffractive production of charm and beauty. We make estimates which could be compared to future measurements at the LHC. Keywords: Heavy flavour production; Pomeron physics; Single diffraction; Quantum Chromodynamics 1. INTRODUCTION the diffractive quarkonium production, which is now sensitive to the gluon content of the Pomeron at small-x and may be For a long time, diffractive processes in hadron collisions particularly useful in studying the different mechanisms for have been described by Regge theory in terms of the exchange quarkonium production. of a Pomeron with vacuum quantum numbers [1]. However, the nature of the Pomeron and its reaction mechanisms are In order to do so, we will use the hard diffractive factoriza- not completely known.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Avenue to Parton Distribution Functions Uncertainties: Self-Organizing Maps Abstract
    A New Avenue to Parton Distribution Functions Uncertainties: Self-Organizing Maps Abstract Neural network algorithms have been recently applied to construct Parton Distribution Functions (PDFs) parametrizations as an alternative to standard global fitting procedures. We propose a different technique, namely an interactive neural network algorithm using Self-Organizing Maps (SOMs). SOMs enable the user to directly control the data selection procedure at various stages of the process. We use all available data on deep inelastic scattering experiments in the kinematical region of 0:001 ≤ x ≤ 0:75, and 1 ≤ Q2 ≤ 100 GeV2, with a cut on the final state invariant mass, W 2 ≥ 10 GeV2. Our main goal is to provide a fitting procedure that, at variance with standard neural network approaches, allows for an increased control of the systematic bias. Controlling the theoretical uncertainties is crucial for determining the outcome of a variety of high energy physics experiments using hadron beams. In particular, it is a prerequisite for unambigously extracting from experimental data the signal of the Higgs boson, that is considered to be, at present, the key for determining the theory of the masses of all known elementary particles, or the Holy Grail of particle physics. PACS numbers: 13.60.-r, 12.38.-t, 24.85.+p 1 I. DEFINITION OF THE PROBLEM AND GENERAL REMARKS In high energy physics experiments one detects the cross section, σX , for observing a particle X during a given collision process. σX is proportional to the number of counts in the detector. It is, therefore, directly \observable". Consider the collision between two hadrons (a hadron is a more general name to indicate a proton, neutron...or a more exotic particle made of quarks).
    [Show full text]
  • Upgrade of the Global Muon Trigger for the Compact Muon Solenoid Experiment at CERN”
    DISSERTATION/DOCTORAL THESIS Titel der Dissertation/Title of the Doctoral Thesis “Upgrade of the Global Muon Trigger for the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment at CERN” verfasst von/submitted by Mag. Dinyar Sebastian Rabady angestrebter akademischer Grad/in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doktor der Naturwissenschaften (Dr. rer. nat.) Wien, im Jänner 2018/Vienna, in January 2018 Studienkennzahl lt. Studienblatt/ A 796 605 411 degree programme code as it appears on the student record sheet: Studienrichtung lt. Studienblatt/ Physik field of study as it appears onthe student record sheet: Betreut von/Supervisor: Dipl.-Ing. Dr. Claudia-Elisabeth Wulz Hon.-Prof. Dipl.-Phys. Dr. Eberhard Widmann Für meinen Großvater. Abstract The Large Hadron Collider is a large particle accelerator at the CERN research labo- ratory, designed to provide particle physics experiments with collisions at unprece- dented centre-of-mass energies. For its second running period both the number of colliding particles and their collision energy were increased. To cope with these more challenging conditions and maintain the excellent performance seen during the first running period, the Level-1 trigger of the Compact Muon Solenoid experiment — a so- phisticated electronics system designed to filter events in real-time — was upgraded. This upgrade consisted of the complete replacement of the trigger electronics andafull redesign of the system’s architecture. While the calorimeter trigger path now follows a time-multiplexed processing model where the entire trigger data for a collision are received by a single processing board, the muon trigger path was split into regional track finding systems where each newly introduced track finder receives data from all three muon subdetectors for a certain geometric detector slice and reconstructs fully formed muon tracks from this.
    [Show full text]
  • Collider Physics at HERA
    ANL-HEP-PR-08-23 Collider Physics at HERA M. Klein1, R. Yoshida2 1University of Liverpool, Physics Department, L69 7ZE, Liverpool, United Kingdom 2Argonne National Laboratory, HEP Division, 9700 South Cass Avenue, Argonne, Illinois, 60439, USA May 21, 2008 Abstract From 1992 to 2007, HERA, the first electron-proton collider, operated at cms energies of about 320 GeV and allowed the investigation of deep-inelastic and photoproduction processes at the highest energy scales accessed thus far. This review is an introduction to, and a summary of, the main results obtained at HERA during its operation. To be published in Progress in Particle and Nuclear Physics arXiv:0805.3334v1 [hep-ex] 21 May 2008 1 Contents 1 Introduction 4 2 Accelerator and Detectors 5 2.1 Introduction.................................... ...... 5 2.2 Accelerator ..................................... ..... 6 2.3 Deep Inelastic Scattering Kinematics . ............. 9 2.4 Detectors ....................................... .... 12 3 Proton Structure Functions 15 3.1 Introduction.................................... ...... 15 3.2 Structure Functions and Parton Distributions . ............... 16 3.3 Measurement Techniques . ........ 18 3.4 Low Q2 and x Results .................................... 19 2 3.4.1 The Discovery of the Rise of F2(x, Q )....................... 19 3.4.2 Remarks on Low x Physics.............................. 20 3.4.3 The Longitudinal Structure Function . .......... 22 3.5 High Q2 Results ....................................... 23 4 QCD Fits 25 4.1 Introduction.................................... ...... 25 4.2 Determinations ofParton Distributions . .............. 26 4.2.1 TheZEUSApproach ............................... .. 27 4.2.2 TheH1Approach................................. .. 28 4.3 Measurements of αs inInclusiveDIS ............................ 29 5 Jet Measurements 32 5.1 TheoreticalConsiderations . ........... 32 5.2 Jet Cross-Section Measurements . ........... 34 5.3 Tests of pQCD and Determination of αs .........................
    [Show full text]
  • Sub Atomic Particles and Phy 009 Sub Atomic Particles and Developments in Cern Developments in Cern
    1) Mahantesh L Chikkadesai 2) Ramakrishna R Pujari [email protected] [email protected] Mobile no: +919480780580 Mobile no: +917411812551 Phy 009 Sub atomic particles and Phy 009 Sub atomic particles and developments in cern developments in cern Electrical and Electronics Electrical and Electronics KLS’s Vishwanathrao deshpande rural KLS’s Vishwanathrao deshpande rural institute of technology institute of technology Haliyal, Uttar Kannada Haliyal, Uttar Kannada SUB ATOMIC PARTICLES AND DEVELOPMENTS IN CERN Abstract-This paper reviews past and present cosmic rays. Anderson discovered their existence; developments of sub atomic particles in CERN. It High-energy subato mic particles in the form gives the information of sub atomic particles and of cosmic rays continually rain down on the Earth’s deals with basic concepts of particle physics, atmosphere from outer space. classification and characteristics of them. Sub atomic More-unusual subatomic particles —such as particles also called elementary particle, any of various self-contained units of matter or energy that the positron, the antimatter counterpart of the are the fundamental constituents of all matter. All of electron—have been detected and characterized the known matter in the universe today is made up of in cosmic-ray interactions in the Earth’s elementary particles (quarks and leptons), held atmosphere. together by fundamental forces which are Quarks and electrons are some of the elementary represente d by the exchange of particles known as particles we study at CERN and in other gauge bosons. Standard model is the theory that laboratories. But physicists have found more of describes the role of these fundamental particles and these elementary particles in various experiments.
    [Show full text]
  • Deep Inelastic Scattering
    Particle Physics Michaelmas Term 2011 Prof Mark Thomson e– p Handout 6 : Deep Inelastic Scattering Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 176 e– p Elastic Scattering at Very High q2 ,At high q2 the Rosenbluth expression for elastic scattering becomes •From e– p elastic scattering, the proton magnetic form factor is at high q2 Phys. Rev. Lett. 23 (1969) 935 •Due to the finite proton size, elastic scattering M.Breidenbach et al., at high q2 is unlikely and inelastic reactions where the proton breaks up dominate. e– e– q p X Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 177 Kinematics of Inelastic Scattering e– •For inelastic scattering the mass of the final state hadronic system is no longer the proton mass, M e– •The final state hadronic system must q contain at least one baryon which implies the final state invariant mass MX > M p X For inelastic scattering introduce four new kinematic variables: ,Define: Bjorken x (Lorentz Invariant) where •Here Note: in many text books W is often used in place of MX Proton intact hence inelastic elastic Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 178 ,Define: e– (Lorentz Invariant) e– •In the Lab. Frame: q p X So y is the fractional energy loss of the incoming particle •In the C.o.M. Frame (neglecting the electron and proton masses): for ,Finally Define: (Lorentz Invariant) •In the Lab. Frame: is the energy lost by the incoming particle Prof. M.A. Thomson Michaelmas 2011 179 Relationships between Kinematic Variables •Can rewrite the new kinematic variables in terms of the squared centre-of-mass energy, s, for the electron-proton collision e– p Neglect mass of electron •For a fixed centre-of-mass energy, it can then be shown that the four kinematic variables are not independent.
    [Show full text]
  • Particle Accelerators and Experiments Albert De Roeck CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Antwerp University Belgium UC-Davis California USA NTU, Singapore
    Particle Accelerators and Experiments Albert De Roeck CERN, Geneva, Switzerland Antwerp University Belgium UC-Davis California USA NTU, Singapore March 30th- April 2nd Muscat 1 Part I Accelerators 2 Different types of Methodology tools and equipment are needed to observe different sizes of object Only particle accelerators can explore the tiniest objects in the 5 Universe 5 Accelerators are Powerful Microscopes Planck constant They make high energy particle beams h = momentum that allow us to see small things. wavelength p ~ energy seen by low energy seen by high energy beam of particles beam of particles (poorer resolution) (better resolution) High Energy Physics Experiments Rutherford experiment (1909) Centre of mass energy squared s=E1m2 Centre of mass energy squared s=4E1E2 Detectors techniques have followed these developments Accelerators for Charged Particles 9 Recent High Energy Colliders Highest energies can be reached with proton colliders Machine Year Beams Energy (s) Luminosity SPPS (CERN) 1981 pp 630-900 GeV 6.1030cm-2s-1 Tevatron (FNAL) 1987 pp 1800-2000 GeV 1031-1032cm-2s-1 SLC (SLAC) 1989 e+e- 90 GeV 1030cm-2s-1 LEP (CERN) 1989 e+e- 90-200 GeV 1031-1032cm-2s-1 HERA (DESY) 1992 ep 300 GeV 1031-1032cm-2s-1 RHIC (BNL) 2000 pp /AA 200-500 GeV 1032cm-2s-1 LHC (CERN) 2009 pp (AA) 7-14 TeV 1033-1034cm-2s-1 Luminosity = number of events/cross section/sec • Limits on circular machines – Proton colliders: Dipole magnet strength superconducting magnets – Electron colliders: Synchrotron10 radiation/RF power: loss ~E4/R2 How Many Accelerators Worldwide? a) 1-10 b) 10-100 c) 100-1,000 d) 1,000-10,000 e) > 10,000 11 Accelerators Worldwide > 25,000 accelerators in use 12 Accelerators Worldwide 44% Radio- therapy 13 Accelerators Worldwide 44% 40% Radio- Ion therapy implant.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1405.7662V4 [Hep-Ph] 28 Aug 2014
    THE PHYSICS PROGRAMME OF THE MoEDAL EXPERIMENT AT THE LHC B. ACHARYA1;2; J. ALEXANDRE1, J. BERNABEU´ 3, M. CAMPBELL4, S. CECCHINI5, J. CHWASTOWSKI6, M. DE MONTIGNY7, D. DERENDARZ6, A. DE ROECK4, J. R. ELLIS1;4, M. FAIRBAIRN1, D. FELEA8, M. FRANK9, D. FREKERS10, C. GARCIA3, G. GIACOMELLI5;5ay, J. JAKUBEK˚ 11, A. KATRE12, D-W KIM13, M.G.L. KING3, K. KINOSHITA14, D. LACARRERE4, S. C. LEE11, C. LEROY15, A. MARGIOTTA5, N. MAURI5;5a, N. E. MAVROMATOS1;4, P. MERMOD12, V. A. MITSOU3, R. ORAVA16, L. PASQUALINI5;5a, L. PATRIZII5, G. E. PAV˘ ALAS¸˘ 8, J. L. PINFOLD7∗, M. PLATKEVICˇ 11, V. POPA8, M. POZZATO5, S. POSPISIL11, A. RAJANTIE17, Z. SAHNOUN5;5b, M. SAKELLARIADOU1, S. SARKAR1, G. SEMENOFF18, G. SIRRI5, K. SLIWA19, R. SOLUK7, M. SPURIO5;5a, Y.N. SRIVASTAVA20, R. STASZEWSKI6, J. SWAIN20, M. TENTI5;5a, V. TOGO5, M. TRZEBINSKI6, J. A. TUSZYNSKI´ 7, V. VENTO3, O. VIVES3, Z. VYKYDAL11, and A. WIDOM20, J. H. YOON21. (for the MoEDAL Collaboration) 1Theoretical Particle Physics and Cosmology Group, Physics Department, King's College London, UK 2International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy 3IFIC, Universitat de Val`encia- CSIC, Valencia, Spain 4Physics Department, CERN, Geneva, Switzerland 5 INFN, Section of Bologna, 40127, Bologna , Italy 5a Department of Physics & Astronomy, University of Bologna, Italy 5b Centre on Astronomy, Astrophysics and Geophysics, Algiers, Algeria 6 Institute of Nuclear Physics Polish Academy of Sciences, Cracow, Poland 7Physics Department, University of Alberta, Edmonton Alberta, Canada 8Institute of Space
    [Show full text]