<<

MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 105: 121-138.1994 Published February I? Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser.

Comparative effects of water-column nitrate enrichment on eelgrass marina, shoalgrass wrightii, and widgeongrass maritima

JoAnn M. Burkholder, Howard B. Glasgow Jr, Jacob E. Cooke

Department of Botany, Box 7612, State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695-7612, USA

ABSTRACT. In an experimental mesocosm system during late summer-fall, we examined shoot pro- duction by eelgrass without nitrate additions (generally with ambient water-column concentrations c 2 pM N03--N) versus production by eelgrass that previously had been exposed to low nitrate enrichment (pulsed additions of 5 pM NO,--N d-' to the water for 12 wk during an unusually cool spring season). During late summer-fall, the previously enriched were subjected to higher nitrate loading (10 pM NO<-N d-' for 14 wk), while control plants were maintained without nitrate additions as in spring. We also compared shoot production in fall by recent field transplants of Z. manna, , and Ruppia rnarit~rnawith and without additions of 10 pM water-column NO3--N d-'. Low water exchange (10% d-l) was used to s~mulateconditions in sheltered embayments or lagoons, and light reduct~onfrom high was simulated by covering the mesocosnls with neutral- density screens that reduced incident light by 30 % for 3 h d.' on a rotating schedule. Shoot production by both enriched and unenriched Z. marina was comparable dunng the spring low-level NO3--N expo- sure. However, eelgrass enriched with nitrate in both spring and fall attained significantly lower shoot production than control plants without enrichment. This decrease, unrelated to light reduction from algal growth, suggests a direct adverse effect of long-term water-column nitrate exposure on Z. marina. The more recent transplants of eelgrass without prior enrichment history also showed a trend for decreased lateral growth under moderately elevated nitrate. In contrast, H. wrightii was slightly stim- ulated and R. rnaritima was highly stimulated by water-column nitrate relative to growth of controls. By the end of the fall experiment, Z. marina (f NO3--N), H. wrightii (k NO3--N), and unenriched R. mari- tima had increased shoot densities by <50%, whereas nitrate-enriched R. maritima increased shoot production by >300%. The data indicate that H. wrightii or R. maritima could be established success- fully by transplanting efforts as a management strategy in nitrate-enriched waters where eelgrass meadows have disappeared. Unlike 2. marina, these species apparently have developed physiological mechanisms to more effectively control nitrate uptake and metabolism.

KEY WORDS: Eutrophication . Macrophytes . Nitrate. . Zostera marina

INTRODUCTION ows have been correlated with nutrient loading from cultural eutrophication (Borum 1985, Twilley et al. 1985, The high productivity, habitat value, substrate stabi- Orth et al. 1986). Eutrophication effects on lization, and other beneficial effects of seagrass mead- are most severe in sheltered habitats with reduced tidal ows prompted ecologists McRoy & McMillan (1977)to flushing, where nutrient loadings are both concentrated write, 'We know enough to understand in general what and frequent, and where temperatures fluctuate more we would lose if catastrophe took seagrass ecosystems widely than in areas with greater water exchange from the world oceans. We would lose options. More (Stevenson 1988, Maier & Pregnall 1990). than ever, that is a loss beyond affording.' Within the Among the 3 most commonly considered inorganic past few decades, catastrophic losses of seagrass mead- nutrient forms contributed in anthropogenic inputs,

O Inter-Research 1994 122 Mar. Ecol. Prog.Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

phosphate and ammonia readily adsorb to particulate MATERIALS AND METHODS matter and, as a result, are less available to plants for uptake than the abundant, highly soluble, and readily Study area. This research was conducted in North transported nitrate (Alberts & Moldenhauer 1981, Carolina, USA, representing the southernmost exten- Grobbelaar 1983, Froelich 1988, Simon 1989). In large- sion for Zostera marina and the northernmost exten- scale experimental mesocosms under warm spring sion for Halodule wn'ghtii on the western Atlantic conditions and simulated reduced tidal flushing, we Coast (Thayer et al. 1984). In this area eelgrass grows recently determined that water-column nitrate enrich- stunted from high-temperature stress (Den Hartog ment can cause death to eelgrass Zostera marina L. as 1970); its maximum shoot length averages only ca a direct physiological effect unrelated to algal light 40 cm (Thayer et al. 1984). Shallow bay waters typi- attenuation (Burkholder et al. 1992). The apparent lack cally reach 33°C from late spring through early of an inhibition mechanism for sustained nitrate autumn (Thayer et al. 1984, NOAA 1993). Tempera- uptake by eelgrass leaf tissue (Roth & Pregnall 1988) tures above 30 "C have been shown to be detrimental was hypothesized to eventually cause internal imbal- to eelgrass by increasing respiration and impairing ances in supply ratios of other critically needed nutri- enzyme activities (Lambers 1985, et al. 1986, ents such as carbon or phosphorus (Burkholder et al. Zimrnerman et al. 1989). Agriculture, industry, and 1992), perhaps from the need to shunt carbon skele- accelerated coastal development in North Carolina tons for amino acid synthesis in order to prevent inter- have been associated with increased nutrient loading nal accumulation of toxic products such as ammonia (Jacobs & Gilham 1985, Stanley 1988), and loss of eel- (Turpin 1991). grass habitat in upper embayments has been reported One surprising aspect of our previous results was anecdotally in the absence of long-term vegetation that pulsed daily additions of even low levels of enrich- maps (Ferguson et al. 1988, Mather 1988). ment (3.5 to 7.0 pM NO3--N d-' for 8 wk) adversely Eelgrass mesocosm system: physicallchemical char- affected eelgrass. The permissible level of water- acteristics. The experimental seagrass mesocosm sys- column nitrate that enables long-term survival of tem is located outdoors on the north shore of Beaufort Zostera marina would be expected to change depend- Inlet at the Southeast Laboratory of the National ing on interactions with other variables such as tem- Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) on Pivers Island. The perature, light, past history of exposure to nitrate, system consists of fiberglass mesocosms coated with duration of exposure to elevated nitrate, and age/gen- non-toxic white gelcoat resin. Each mesocosm is 2 m in era1 physiological condition of the plants. Z, marina diameter X 1 m in height, with a 60 cm worlung depth likely evolved in nutrient-poor waters, and sustained that was established by creating a raised bottom to nitrate uptake under temporary enrichment may have accommodate our small plants (mean length 40 cm) developed as a competitive strategy that was once while reducing wall shading effects. Water depth and highly advantageous. As coastal waters have become sediment thickness during experiments were 0.5 m progressively more eutrophic, however (Magnien et al. and 12 cm, respectively. Running seawater was 1992, Miller 1992), this trait might instead have pumped in from a 4 m depth (high tide) at a location enabled less nitrate-sensitive macrophytes to establish upstream from the dock area at NMFS. The sediment and become dominant in nitrate-rich waters. consisted of clean dredge sand and salt marsh mud The 2 objectives of the present research were to in a 3: 1 ratio by volume. To minimize heterogeneity examine fall growth of eelgrass with/without a pre- among mesocosms, approximately 8 t of sediment history of exposure to water-column nitrate enrich- were homogenized with a cement mixer and distrib- ment, and to compare shoot production by Zostera uted equally to a depth of ca 15 cm. For 11 mo before marina and 2 CO-inhabitant angiosperms, shoalgrass beginning the experiments, the sediment was main- Halodule wrightii Ascher and widgeongrass Ruppia tained with eelgrass shoots transplanted from an unen- maritima L. under elevated water-column nitrate. riched field site (Middle Marsh near Beaufort; initially Although they generally are considered to be of ca 500 plants m-*) under 525% water exchange d-l. lower habitat value than Z, marina, these submersed After 6 mo the sediment had become well colonized by macrophytes also provide habitat and food for com- diverse communities of and invertebrates (as in mercially important finfish, shellfish and waterfowl Burkholder et al. 1992). (Kikuchi & Peres 1977, Thayer et al. 1979, Thayer et A chiller system (3 custom-designed, 4.5 t condensing al. 1984). H. wrightii and R. maritima are of potential units, each capable of a maximum of 60000 BTU h-' interest in re-establishing submersed aquatic vegeta- cooling capacity) was used to maintain baywater tem- tion where loss of Z. manna has been correlated with peratures and mixing, with current velocities set at 5 to nutrient enrichment from coastal development (01th 8 cm S-'. Within the chillers, electronically controlled et al. 1986). thermal expansion valves regulated freon coolant to Burkholder et al.: Effects of nitrate enrichment on seagrasses

each titanium heat exchanger, and provided indepen- among the mesocosm communities. Shoots were trans- dent temperature control for each mesocosm. Ambient planted to attain initial densities of 2850 plants m-2, temperature and of the baywater were 9 to 28 "C and were allowed to acclimate for 3 wk before begin- and 26 to 36%0, respectively, during spring and late ning nitrate additions in treated mesocosms. To help summer-fall 1992. Diurnal temperature extremes of the control herbivore densities and to include a higher shallow baywater and the mesocosms were at 56°C trophic level, we added 5 small Atlantic croaker hdlcr0- during both spring and late summer-fall. Throughout pogonias undulatus L. to each mesocosm. Occasional the experiments the mesocosms were maintained at dead fish were removed and replaced with live fish f 2 "C of ambient baywater temperatures (< 27 "C on throughout the experiments. warmest days). By comparison, ambient bay tempera- During the spring season of maximal eelgrass tures in shallow coastal waters typically reach 30 to growth (Thayer et al. 1984) and maximal sensitivity to 33 "C from late spring through early autumn (Thayer et water-column nitrate (Burkholder et al. 1992), we com- al. 1984, NOAA 1993). Light reduction from high tide pared control eelgrass transplants (ambient nitrate was simulated using neutral density shades that generally <2 pM NO3--N) to transplants under 'low' reduced photosynthetically active radiation by about nitrate enrichment at ambient baywater temperatures 30 % while still maintaining light above saturation for (pulsed additions of 5 pM NO3--N d-l for a total load- eelgrass photosynthesis (> 350 pEin m-'s-l; Dennison & ing of ca 3.06 g m-2 for 12 wk or, if extended, the Alberte 1982, Dennison 1987). equivalent of 13.3 g NO3--N m-2 yr-l). The late sum- During experiments (spring: 26 March to 17 June mer-fall experiment compared macrophyte species 1992; late summer-fall: 30 August to 6 December response to 'moderate' nitrate enrichment as 10 pM 1992), nitrate was added daily between 08:OO and NO3--N d-l, a level considered to adversely affect eel- 10:OO h when high uptake was expected (Morris 1974, grass growth in autumn based on previous data (Burk- Turpin 1991), whereas low water exchange (10% d-l, holder et al. 1992; total loading of ca 7.13 g m-2 for simulating conditions in poorly flushed coastal em- 14 wk or, if extended, the equivalent of 26.6 g NO3--N bayments and lagoons) was completed between 16:00 m-2 yr-l). The selected loadings were within the range and 18:OO h during late afternoon. Each mesocosm reported for estuaries under cultural eutrophication was independent of the others in plumbing of intake [generally 2 10 g dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) and outflow lines, so that there was no treatment m-2 yr-l; e.g. Valiela & Costa 1988, Magnien et al. cross-contamination. Nitrate-contaminated water was 1992, Monbet 1992, Nienhuis 19921. The fall season gravity-fed to a small salt marsh ca 200 m from the coincided with a second, less productive period for mesocosm water intake site, for effective treatment cold-optimal Zostera marina within an annual cycle and to prevent contamination of mesocosms during (Penhale 1977), and with the active growing season for water exchange. Halodule wrightii and . All 3 species Preparation and experimental design. In the 11 mo are perennials but H. wrightii and R. maritima are system acclimation period following sediment ex- warm-optimal, with growth beginning in late spring change, eelgrass shoots that were transplanted into the and extending into late fall (Muenscher 1964, Thayer experimental system during May 1991 (from the same et al. 1984). Hence, the late summer-fall experimental unenriched field site at Middle Marsh) had attained period encompassed seasonal growth periods for the 3 dense growth of > 1500 shoots m-2 in most mesocosms, species, and simulated the natural progression of sea- with thick masses of roots and which were sonal activity by each macrophyte. difficult to dislodge. To reset the system with homo- Mesocosms were randomly selected as controls or N- geneous populations of eelgrass, algae and macro- enriched for the spring experiment, with each meso- invertebrates prior to the spring 1992 nitrate experi- cosm consistently maintained as either a control or an ment, we removed all eelgrass plants (including N-enriched replicate during both spring and late attached belowground tissue) from the mesocosms, summer-fall (Fig. 1). At 30 min after adding nitrate to separated them by mesocosm number, and floated enriched enclosures in the spring low N treatment, them in running seawater. Mesocosm walls were NO3--N averaged 5.2 f 1.3 PM, versus background scraped clean of most macroalgae and repeatedly concentrations of 2.5 k 0.5 pM NO,--N measured 24 h drained to flush residual algal suspensions. The sedi- later, prior to the next pulsed nitrate addition (compa- ments and walls were also vacuumed. Plants were rable to or slightly higher than ambient; n = 3 trials at cleaned of most epiphytes, sorted into loose bundles of monthly intervals). Thus, at the low N additions used in 5 to 8 shoots, and maintained in flow-through seawater spring, nitrate did not accumulate in the water column at ambient baywater temperature (14°C) until they of enriched mesocosms. were replanted (within 3 d). The planting procedure For more than 3 wk after the spring experiment, all normalized any long-term, enclosure-specific effects mesocosms were maintained in running seawater, and 124 Mar Ecol. Prog. Ser 105: 121-138, 1994

C- l C-2 C-3 t N-l N-2 N-3 COKlROLS LOW N TREATMENI- EWERlMENI'ENDED: FLUSHED WlH RLJNNING SEAWATER FOR U WK I PmREMOVED: MESOOOSMSRESFT J MID-SUMMER (5 DAYS)

PLAKlSCLEANED, SORTEDB BUNDLED. PIAKISCLE4NED. SORTED & BUNDLED. PLMALLOCATION: PLAKTALLOCATON:

WUIXlTD, W. BUNDLED AND PlAKIEDPReSH FIELD TRAMS PLANE OF WSTERA.HALODIILE, RUPPL4(5 DAYS; ACCUMATED6 WR) I 1 CONTROLAND 1 N-ENRICHED REPUCATE LOST (FUNGALAITACR)

LATE SUMMER - FALL

(14 W)

C-l C-2 N-l N-2 CONTROLS MODN ENRICHMENT

Fig. 1. Expenmental design, spnng-fall 1992. The spnng experiment included 3 control (C-l, C-2 and C-3; ambient nitrate at < 1.5 PM)and 3 low N-enriched mesocosms (N-l, N-2 and N-3; 5 pM NO3--N added d-', or sufficient nitrate to effect a water-column concentration of 60 pg I-').After the spring experiment. N-enriched plants were collected and segregated by mesocosm. While mesocosms were reset (similar protocol as before the spring experiment), plants were cleaned and separated into 3 equal sub- groupings. In the K-enriched mesocosms, 1/4 of the surface area was replanted with 50% as plants from N-l and 50 % as plants from N-2 [= N-ennched LZ,or LTMA (long-term mesocosm-acchated) Zostera manna for the late summer-fall expenment].Plants from N-3 were discarded because they had encountered low-light stress during spring (potentially confounded by crab disturbance and higher macroalgal growth) as well as nitrate enrichment. A similar process was followed for plants collected from/replanted into C-l, C-2 and C-3 (=control LZ, or LTMA Z. marina). During the same period, Z. manna, Halodule wnghtii and Ruppia maritirna (2, H and R respect~vely)were freshly transplanted into the system from unennched field habitat. A fungal attack occurred in 1 control and 1 enriched mesocosm between expenments, and these mesocosms were omitted as fall replicates Burkholder et al.:Effects of niltrate ennchment on seagrasses 125

the N-treated mesocosms received no further nitrate (WEL11A-601R). Salinity was measured daily with a additions. Plants were then collected and replanted as Reichert refractometer. PAR in the upper eelgrass 'long-term, mesocosm-acclimated' (LTMA) eelgrass, canopy was recorded daily using a LiCor data logger following the procedure outlined in Fig. 1. Hence, (model 1000) connected to a submersible 47r PAR quan- these LTMA plants were used in both the spring and tum sensor (model LI-193SA). Samples for nutrient late summer-fall experiments. To compare macro- analyses were collected in duplicate from each meso- phyte species response to water-column nitrate, cosm weekly during the early morning prior to addi- Zostera marjna, Halodule wrightii and Ruppia mar- tion of nitrate in treatments. Nitrate was determined on itima also were freshly transplanted into the meso- a Technicon autoanalyzer (model 11) following the cosms from the same unenriched field site where the copper-cadmium reduction procedure of Parsons et al. LTMA eelgrass had been collected. Each type (1985). Ammonium was measured with the Solorzano occupied 1 delineated, randomly selected quarter of method (Parsons et al. 1985) using modifications of each mesocosm (Fig. 1). From 12 to 16 July these plants Burkholder & Sheath (1985) for immediate preserva- were collected, held in shallow tanks of running sea- tion with phenol. TP was analyzed after acid persulfate water, cleaned of most epiphytes and animals, bun- digestion (Parsons et al. 1985). dled, and transplanted following procedures in Burk- Macroalgal abundance was estimated from harvests holder et al. (1992).Because eelgrass is larger than the of three 0.1 m2 quadrats haphazardly positioned other 2 species, Z. marina, H, wrightii and R. maritima anlong Zostera marina in spring. During the late were planted at approximate densities of 800, 1200 summer-fall experiment, 1 quadrat was haphazardly and 1200 shoots m-' respectively. Plants were accli- placed among growth of each of the 3 macrophyte spe- mated in the mesocosms for 6 wk (water temperatures cies. In both experiments, the 3 quadrats and collec- S31 "C) prior to initiating the late summer-fall experi- tions of wall growth were combined to obtain an esti- ment. During the first 2 wk of that time, the mesocosms mate of macroalgal abundance for each mesocosm on were flushed with running seawater from the bay the basis of surface area. Macroalgal taxa were sepa- (3 full exchanges h-'); for the remaining 4 wk water rated, cleaned, and oven-dried at 60°C. Periodic exchange was imposed at 10 % d-'. checks indicated that phytoplankton abundances were In the late summer-fall experiment with moderate N low (<400 cells ml-l) throughout both experiments. additions, nitrate accun~ulatedin the water column of Based on monthly estimates as in Burkholder et al. enriched enclosures. At ca 30 min after treatment, ni- (1992), the biomass of microalgal epiphytes was negli- trate averaged 12.0 2 1.5 pM NO3--N versus concentra- gible f nitrate enrichment, in comparison to that of tions of 6.3 7t4.5 pM NO3--N measured 24 h later prior floating and benthic macroalgae. Herbivory can con- to the next pulsed nitrate addition (n = 4 trials at bi- trol algal biomass seasonally in some seagrass habitats weekly intervals). Despite measurable nitrate accumu- (01th & van Montfrans 1984, Neckles 1993, Williams & lation, plant uptake and net export via water exchange Ruckelshaus 1993), and may indirectly influence Z. maintained the mean and median seasonal DIN con- marina survival under nitrate enrichment. Hence, on 3 centrations (NO3--N + NH,+-N) at 7.6 pM (ca 0.11 mg dates (initial, mid-point, and final) macro-invertebrate I-') and 4.0 pM (ca 0.06 mg 1-'), respectively, over the algal herbivores were quantified from 3 cores (4 cm 14 wk experiment, well below the median seasonal diameter) that were collected to include 1 or more upper limit of <0.15 mg 1-' identified by Batiuk et al. macrophyte shoots. (1992) for protection of eelgrass in the lower Chesa- Macrophyte variables. Aboveground eelgrass pro- peake Bay. Our targeted concentration of 10 pM ductivity during spring was measured by the leaf NO3--N corresponded, in fact, to the maximal DIN con- puncture method of Zieman & Wetzel (1980). Shoots centration that has been established to protect eelgrass were marked at 3 wk intervals, and randomly selected in the lower Chesapeake (Dennison et al. 1993). subsets of 8 to 10 marked plants (or tags from dead Physical, chemical and community variables. Envi- plants) were collected weekly. This method was ronmental variables that were measured routinely flawed since only shoots that were sufficiently large included temperature, salinity, photosynthetically and robust to enable marking were selected; hence, active radiation (PAR), and water-column nitrate the data overestimated mean growth and more closely (NO3--N), ammonium (NH,+-N), and total phos- approximated maximum estimates. Leaf growth mea- phorus (TP). Temperature was monitored daily by surements were omitted from the late summer-fall an automated digitized system that consisted of 12 experiment. A more reliable indicator of plant re- Johnson model A350 electronic temperature control sponse was obtained in both experiments by consider- modules, used in conjunction with Johnson control ing net shoot production ('lateral' growth), a popu- model SET189A-600 temperature sensors that were lation-level index (change in shoot number = shoots mounted inside the mesocosms within immersion wells present initially + shoots produced - dead shoots). 126 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

Change In shoot density of the 4 plant categories rately in above- and belowground tissue of Zostera (LTMA Zostera marina and recent field transplants of marina near the end of the late summer-fall experi- Z. marina, Halodule wrightii and Ruppia maritima) ment (December, Week 12). Plants were harvested from each mesocosm over the experiment was deter- between 15:OO and 18:OO h, cleaned of epiphytes and mined by quantifying the total shoots within a marked sediment in running seawater, and transported to the 0.1 m2 quadrat. laboratory in darkness on ice. The 3 youngest leaves Eelgrass and other angiosperms are known to and the living rh~zomes(with beige-colored interior) decrease production of anti-microbial phenolics in Ni- and roots were used in the tissue analyses. For each enriched, light-replete conditions (Bazzaz et al. 1987, mesocosm total protein was determined from a pooled Buchsbaum et al. 1990). To assess whether water- sample of 3 randomly selected plants, following a mod- column nitrate enrichment affected seagrass suscepti- ification of the Coomassie brilliant blue procedure bility to pathogenic organisms, the proportion of (Dawes & Kenworthy 1990). Acid-soluble or dissolved aboveground Zostera marina tissue (percentage of carbohydrates (including simple sugars, oligosaccha- brown and blackened areas) affected by the oppor- rides, polysaccharides, and derivatives having a free or tunistic slime-mold-like pathogen zos- potentially free radical group) were measured follow- terae (Muehlstein et al. 1991) was estimated from ing Dawes & Kenworthy (1990). plants harvested for growth measurements at 7 to 9 d On similar tissue, the activity of the primary enzyme intervals during spring, and in the first and last 2 wk of involved in nitrate uptake, nitrate reductase (NRase), the late summer-fall experiment. On 3 dates in late was assayed from Zostera marina after 3 wk in both summer-fall (3, 10 and 14 wk), we also used light experiments, and also after 14 wk in late summer-fall. microscopy (100 to 600x, Olympus BHS microscope) to From each mesocosm 6 plants were harvested, compare the structural integrity of meristem cross- cleaned, and transported to the laboratory, and NRase sections from control versus N-enriched eelgrass was assayed using the technique of Roth & Pregnall shoots. For these comparisons, fresh plant material (1988). The activity of a key enzyme involved in Ni from 6 plants per mesocosm was preserved in 50% assimilation, glutamine synthetase (GS), was also ethanol or in 5 % gluteraldehyde-seawater (Moffler & assayed from Z. manna after 3 and 14 wk in late Durako 1984; prefiltered with 0.8 pm pore size Milli- summer-fall, following the procedure of Pregnall et al. pore filters), sectioned by hand (sterile technique (1987). within a laminar flow hood; tissue section thickness Statistical analyses. Separate data analyses were 10 pm), and paraffin-embedded. Fungal colonization completed for the 2 seasonal experiments. Correlation was checked after staining tissue with aniline blue analysis was performed initially by date to examine (Schneider 1981). relationships between eelgrass aboveground growth Above- and belowground tissue content of carbon, (spring), macroalgal abundances, PAR, temperature, nitrogen and phosphorus was determined for Zostera lag-effect temperature, and salinity (SAS Institute, Inc. marina at the beginning, mid-point and end of both the 1987).Treatments were compared using the Student's spring and late summer-fall experiments. Tissue C, N t-test (Gill 1978). The (LTMA) Zostera marina plants and P were also measured for Z. marina, Halodule used in the spring-fall manipulation had been main- wrightii and Ruppia maritima near the end of the late tained in the mesocosms for longer duration than summer-fall experiment (l1 wk). For Z. marina, 12 to plants included in the 3-species comparison during 15 plants were collected from each mesocosm, whereas late summer-fall. Hence, direct statistical comparison sufficient material of the 2 smaller species was collected of the effects of water-column nitrate on LTMA Z. to obtain 250 mg of dried tissue for above- versus marina and the recent field transplants of Z. marina belowground analyses (ca 50 shoots per species). Whole was not possible, dlthough inferences were formed plants (with leaves, rhizomes, and roots) were harvested from trends in the data. between 10:OO and 13:00 h, carefully cleaned of algae and sediment in running seawater (2 to 3 min), and frozen on dry ice for transport to the laboratory. They RESULTS were held at -70 "C prior to separation of aboveground from belowground tissue. The tissue was thawed, oven- Zostera marinacommunities and low nitrate dried at 60°C for 12 h, finely ground, and analyzed by exposure during spring the Department of Forestry and the Analytical Labora- tory in the Department of Soil Science at North Carolina The spring season was the third coldest in 50 yr, with State University. baywater temperatures 4 "C lower than average (19 yr Two tissue components, total protein content and weekly means; NOAA 1993). With exception of 1 date, total acid-soluble carbohydrates, were measured sepa- mean water temperatures remained at <25"C until Burkholder et al.: Effects of nitrate enrichment on seagrasses

mid-June (Fig. 2). Salinity was constant (> 30%0)except Growth of macroalgae and Zostera marina was for 8 d near the end of the experiment when high pre- highly variable among replicates of both controls and cipitation held salinity below 30%0 (Fig. 2). On each N-enriched mesocosms. The green macroalga Chaeto- sampling date water temperatures varied by 52°C morpha linum (0. F. Muller) Kiitz. (Chlorophyceae) among all mesocosms, and varied by < 3%0. bloomed in control replicate 1 (C-l),so that the highest Light (PAR) was comparable among the mesocosms macroalgal biomass from unenriched mesocosms except for a 3 wk period (Fig. 2) when a blue crab occurred in that replicate except during late April, (Callinectes sapidus Rathbun) stirred the sediments in when the brown macroalga Ectocarpus siliculosus N-enriched replicate 3 (N-3) prior to its capture and Sauvageau (Phaeophyceae) increased in C-3 (Fig. 4). removal. Macroalgal abundance was comparable among con- As expected, water-column nutrient concentrations trols and enriched mesocosms (< 80 g m-2, with mean in control and nitrate-enriched mesocosms were com- abundance 535 g m-2) except in N-3, where the green parable throughout the spring experiment. Mean macroalgae Enterornorpha spp. and Cladophora mon- NO,--N levels in controls remained at 2 PM or less tagneana Kiitz. were dominant with maxima in dry except for increases up to ca 7 FM during precipita- weight during late April (235 g m-2) and June (485 g tion events (Fig. 3). The onset of warmer conditions m-') respectively (Fig. 4). In N-3, Enteromorpha spp. toward the end of the spring experiment was associ- produced most of the macroalgal biomass during April, ated with qualitatively higher mean levels of NH,+-N whereas C. montagneana and E. siliculosus were and TP in the enriched treatment, but concentrations codominant in June. Macroinvertebrate densities were of both nutrients did not differ significantly from those comparable in controls and N-enriched mesocosms in controls (Fig. 3). throughout most of the experiment, except that amphipods were ca 5-fold more abundant in controls during the first 2 wk (p < 0.05; Fig. 5). There was no SPRING significant correlation between macroinvertebrate densities and rnacroalgal abundances, with or without nitrate enrichment. Zostera marina leaf growth was similar among con- trol and enriched mesocosms throughout the experi- ment, except for significantly higher growth by control plants at Week 12 (p < 0.05; Fig. 6). Attack of leaf tissue

4- CONTROL 1

" I CONTROL T I 1 Rep. 3 - I I - APR MAY I JUN Fig. 2. Temperature, salinity and light (as the percent of total PAR just below the water surface) at the base of the eelgrass " I canopy during the spring 1992 experiment (means * 1 SE), APR ' MAY ' JUN considering control and 5 pM NO3--N-enriched mesocosms collectively for temperature and salinity, and plotting light Fig. 3. Nutrient concentrations (means f 1 SE) of NO3--N, separately for control and N-enriched mesocosms to show the NH,+-N and TP during the spring experiment testing the vanability imposed by crab activity in replicate N-3 response of Zostera manna to 5 pM NO3--N enrichment 128 ~VarEcol. Prog. Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

Table 1 Zostera manna Content ('A dry we~ght,means +1 SE) of C, N and P in aboveground and belowground eel- grass dunng the spnng exper~ment Data given for replicate control and ennched (5 pM NO3--N)mesocosms uslng pooled - values of 12 to 15 shoots for each mesocosm 'Slgnlflcant dlf- 7 zoo1 E ferences from shoot content in controls (p < 0 05)

Date Tissue Control 5 pM NO3--N

Carbon 24 Apr Aboveground 35.52 k 0.33 34.94 f 0.25 Belowground 32.15 2 0.52 31.67 f 0.49 17 May Aboveground 35.41 k 0.55 34.77 f 0.36 Belowground 31.08 k 0.87 30.10 f 0.98 6 APR 26APR 23MAY 17JUN 17 Jun Aboveground 35.33 k 0.20 Belowground 31.28 0.74 Fig. 4. Total abundance (means + 1 SE) of macroalgae during 2 the spring experiment, as harvested dry weight per unit sedi- ment surface area Nitrogen 24 Apr Aboveground 1.44 +0.04 Belowground 0.74 +0.00 AMPHIPODS CONTROL 17 May Aboveground 1.42 2 0.09 Belowground 0.75 +0.03 5 NO;N N 1 PM 17 Jun Aboveground 1.45 f 0.07 E Belowground 0.78 f 0.05 Phosphorus 24 Apr Aboveground 0.21 f 0.01 Belowground 0.20 f 0.01 17 May Aboveground 0.18 f 0.01 Belowground 0.17 +0.01 17 Jun Aboveground 0.18 f 0.01 Belowground 0.15 f 0.02

by the pathogen Labyrinthula zosterae also was similar in enriched plants and controls throughout the experi- ment (8 t 4 % versus 5 f 3 % invasion of control and ennched shoots, respectively; n = 12 dates), suggesting that the low water-column nitrate enrichment did not increase eelgrass susceptibility to this opportunistic disease vector. By the end of the experiment, N- enriched eelgrass had significantly higher above- ground tissue nitrogen content than controls (p < 0.05; 20 POLYCHAETES Table l), indicating that a portion of the water-column nitrate source had been taken up by the plants. Fur- ther, belowground tissue carbon content was signifi- cantly lower in enriched than in control shoots (Table 1). NRase activity was highly variable among the nitrate-enriched plants; mean NRase activity after 3 wk was not significantly different between control and ennched shoots, although there was a trend for higher NRase activity under nitrate enrichment (leaf NRase 18 +7 versus 57 t 52 FM NO2- g-' h-' in control INITIAL MID FINAL and N-enriched eelgrass respectively; belowground tissue NRase activity 17 f 4 versus 28 f 8 pM NO2- g-' Fig. 5. Densities (means + 1 SE) of the 3 most abundant com- ponents of the macroinvertebrate community during the h-' in control and N-enriched shoots respectively). spring experiment, as individuals per unit sediment surface Total C/N ratios in aboveground tissue were similar in area. 'Signficantly higher abundance (p < 0.05) control and N-enriched plants, but belowground tissue Burkholder et al.: Effects of nitrate enrichment on seagrasses

Table 2. Zostera manna. Tissue C/N and N/P ratios (means of N-3. This decline coincided with both high macro- + 1 SE) during the spring 1992 experiment for aboveground algal growth in N-3 (485 g dry wt m-2) and reduction in and belowground tissue in replicate control and enriched available light from both macroalgae and sediment (5 pM NO3--N) mesocosms. 'Significant differences from shoot content in controls (p < 0.05) dispersal associated with blue crab activity (Figs. 2, 4 & 7). Significant influences on eelgrass growth by temperature, salinity, PAR, macroalgal abundance, or Date Tissue Control 5 pM NO,--N macroinvertebrate densities were not detected in sta- C/N tistical analyses. Hence, the data, although variable, 24 Apr Aboveground 24.6 +1.1 21.9 +3.2 indicated comparable growth by eelgrass under con- Belowground 43.7 +0.7 '39.1 +1.6 trol and low nitrate-enriched regimes during this 17 May Aboveground 25.2 +2.9 21.8 _+ 1.8 unusually cold spring. Belowground 41.4 f 2.7 40.0 +2.2 17 Jun Aboveground 24.5 +-3.2 20.0 ? 0.6 Belowground 40.1 +2.0 '33.8 f 2.5 Fall experiment: community response to moderate NIP nitrate enrichment 24 Apr Aboveground Belowground Autumn was characterized by cool temperatures that 17 May Aboveground were similar to or slightly lower (1 to 2°C) than long- Belowground term monthly averages (NOAA 1993). Mesocosm 17 Jun Aboveground Belowground water temperatures gradually decreased from maxima at 27 to 29°C in September to a minimum of 9°C in mid-November (Fig. 8). This minimum was followed by a temporary warming period when temperatures C/N ratios were significantly higher in controls after 4 increased to 18°C and then declined to ca 16°C by the and 12 wk (p < 0.05; qualitatively higher belowground end of the experiment. A series of overcast days and tissue C/N ratios in controls after 8 wk, also; Table 2). precipitation events from late September through mid- Throughout the experiment, there was a qualitative October coincided with reduced salinity (Fig. 8). Mini- trend for higher N/P ratios in aboveground tissue mal salinity of 23%0occurred during early October; by of N-enriched plants relative to controls. Further, by the third week in October, salinity had increased to a Week 12 the N/P ratio of belowground tissue was sig- nificantly higher in N-enriched plants than in controls (p < 0.05; Table 2). The population-level index, shoot density, was vari- able in spring, with negligible eelgrass shoot produc- tion in 2 of 3 control replicates and a 24 % decline in shoot numbers from C-3 by the end of the experiment (Fig. 7). This decline apparently was unrelated to macroalgal abundance, which remained low in C-3 even during the Ectocarpussiliculosus increase (maxi- mum at 58 g dry wt m-2 in April, then 6 to 8 g dry wt m-' during May-June; Fig. 4). Among nitrate- enriched mesocosms, shoot numbers increased slightly in N-l and N-2, but there was a 44 % decline in shoots

-40 469 CONTROL

Fig. 7. Zostera manna. Change in shoot densities of eelgrass populations in control and 5 yM NO3--N-enriched mesocosms ., . from the beginning to the end of the spring experiment (as % APR MAY JUN change in shoot numbers). Individual replicates are plotted. given the variation in response within each treatment. Note: Fig. 6. Zostera marina.Leaf growth of eelgrass (elongation of all the lowest eelgrass shoot production in C-3 also coincided new leaves shoot-' d-l) with/without 5 pM NO3--N water-col- with low macroalgal production, whereas lowest shoot pro- umn enrichment in the spring 1992 experiment (means +1 SE) duction in N-3 coincided with highest macroalgal growth 130 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

3 1 T - CONTROL

-- A- UNSHADED SHAOED l 25 -I I I OJ, d I - SEP OCT NOV SEP OCT NOV Fig. 8. Temperature, salinity, and light (means f 1 SE) at the Fig. 9. Concentrations (means f 1 SE) of NO3--N, NH,+-N base of the canopy during the late summer-fall 1992 experi- and TP during the late summer-fall experiment testing ment for control and 10 PM NO3--N-enriched mesocosms, the response of 3 macrophyte specles to 10 yM NO3--N considered collectively in all plots). PAR includes both shaded enrichment and unshaded data to show the decrease that occurred when plants were shaded for 3 h d-' to simulate light reduction from high tide algae, macroinvertebrate densities, again, were highly variable (Fig. 11). N-2 initially supported abundant similar range (30 to 35%0)as before the rainstorms. As isopods (134.1 X 103 ind. m-2 sediment area, versus 8.7 in spring, light was non-limiting (Dennison & Alberte X 103 ind. m-' in the other mesocosms). By December 1982); more than 75 % of the PAR just below the water amphipod densities were highest in replicate N-l surface was available within the Zostera marina (402.4 X lo3 ind. m-2), and mean amphipod densities canopy, decreasing to more than ca 50% availability when plants were shaded for 3 h daily to simulate light reduction from high tide (Fig. 8). Nitrate concentra- tions in control mesocosms were comparable to those MACRO ALGAE CONTROL in the enriched treatment during most of the first 7 wk 300 - T 70uMNOfN (Fig. 9). In the latter part of the experiment, however, nitrate usually was higher in the N-enriched regime, indicating water-column accumulation over time (range up to ca 21 PM NO3--N; significantly higher in N-treated than in control mesocosms after 24 h on 3 dates; p < 0.05; Fig. 9). As during spring, NH,'-N and TP generally were low and comparable among control and enriched mesocosms (Fig. 9). Macroalgal abundance was low (ca 50 g dry wt m-') in controls and in 1 nitrate-enriched replicate (N-l; Fig. 10). Enriched mesocosm N-2 developed dense growth of the red macroalga Polysiphonia sp., with SEP OCT NOV maximal accumulation by mid-October (ca 330 g dry wt m-'). This alga covered the sediment and walls, but Fig. 10. Response of macroalgae to 10 pM N03--Nenrichment mostly occurred as an epiphyte on all 3 macrophyte in the late summer-fall experiment, as harvested dry weight species with noticeably thicker coverage on stems and per unit sediment surface area (means + 1 SE). Note that although there was a trend for higher macroalgal biomass leaves of Ruppia maritima. Polysiphonia sp. declined under nitrate enrichment, the variability in macroalgal to approximately 75 g dry wt m-' in the second response resulted in production that was not significantly dif- enriched replicate by mid-November. As for macro- ferent in control versus enriched mesocosms Burkholder et a1 : Effects of nltrate enr~chmenton seagrasses 131

were significantly higher in N-enriched mesocosms plants (18 +4 % versus 25 _+ 8 % infection, respectively; than in controls (p < 0.05; Fig. 11). Polychaetes were n = 3 dates in early, mid and late fall). Higher NRase significantly more abundant among nitrate-enriched activity (410 +120 nM NOz- g.' h-' and 820 f 50 nM replicate mesocosms than in controls (p < 0.05), per- NO2- g-' h-' in control and enriched plants, respec- haps suggesting a positive (indirect) effect of water- tively, after 3 wk), higher N tissue content, higher C/N column nitrate in increasing organic detritus and other ratios, and lower N/P ratios in above- and below- food resources. ground tissue of N-enriched plants relative to controls indicated that the enriched plants had taken up a por- Zostera marina, Halodule wrightii and Ruppia tion of the nitrate (p < 0.05; Figs. 12, 13 & 14). The maritima under moderate nitrate enrichment aboveground meristem regions of N-enriched plants were structurally intact and similar in appearance to Eelgrass growth was less variable in fall than during the meristems of control plants after 3 wk and 10 wk. spring. As in spring, similar although 2-fold higher Total protein content was similar among control and invasion by the pathogen Labyrinthula zosteraewas N-enriched shoots at 3 wk, whereas GS activity was observed in the leaf tissue of control and N-enriched lower in N-enriched plants (GS at 42 zk 1 versus 31 + 6 mm01 y-glutamyl hydroxamate g-' tissue in controls and N-enriched plants, respectively, after 3 wk; p < 0.06; Figs. 12 & 15). By the end of the experiment (11 to 14 wk) in enriched eelgrass, however, the carbon content of belowground tissue and the total dissolved carbohy- drates of both above- and belowground tissue were significantly lower than in controls (p 0.05; Figs. 13

INITIAL MID FINAL Fig. 12. Zostera manna. Nitrate reductase (NRase) and glu- tamine synthetase (GS) activlties (means + 1 SE) In above- Fig. 11. Densities of the 3 most abundant con~ponentsof the ground tissue of control and N-enriched (10 FM NO3-) macroinvertebrate community during the late summer-fall recently transplanted eelgrass after 3 and 14 wk in the experiment, as individuals per unit sediment surface area late summer-fall experiment. 'Significantly higher activity (means + 1 SE). 'Significantly higher abundance (p < 0.05) (p < 0.05) 132 Mar. Ecol. Prog Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

CONAsoVE N-ENRICH ABOVE 13 ABOVE N-ENRICH ABOVE CONEELOW N-ENRICHBELOW CONBELOW N-ENRICHBELOW

ZOSTERA HALODULE RUPPIA 0.5 PHOSPHORUS Fig. 14. Zostera marina, Halodule rurightii, and Ruppia mar- T T ifima Tissue C/N and N/P ratios (% dry wt, means + SE) of recent transplants after 11 wk in the late summer-fall experi- ment. Data are given as in Fig. 13

+10 nM NO2- g-' fresh wt h-' in controls; Fig. 12).The P content of aboveground tissue in the N-l eelgrass was also low and suggestive of P limitation (Duarte 1990),in comparison to plants from the other enriched and control mesocosms (< 0.08 % in N-l shoots versus ZOSTERA HALODULE RUPPIA > 0.20 O/oin plants from the other N-enriched replicate and controls; Fig. 13). Fig. 13.Zostera marina, Halodule wrightii, and Ruppia mar- it~ma.Tissue content (% dry wt, means + 1 SE) of C, N and P These data indicate that internal nutrient imbalances in above- and belowground tissue of recent transplants after of the N-l eelgrass plants, in particular, were severe. 11 wk in the late summer-fall experiment for replicate control Moreover, whereas nitrate-enriched eelgrass gener- and ennched (10 ;IM NO,--N) rnesocosms. For each meso- ally became weakened and easily fragmented in the cosm, pooled values of 12 to 15 Z. manna plants and ca 50 shoot meristem region, the 'crumbling meristem' shoots of the smaller H. wrightii and R. maritima plants were used. 'Significantly higher tissue content of control or N- condition (Burkholder et al. 1992) was visibly most pro- enriched plants, considenng each specles separately (p < 0.05) nounced from eelgrass in the N-l replicate and coin- cided with higher water-column phosphorus than mea- sured in previous weeks [65 pg TP l-' in N-l at 14 wk & 15).Plants in the N-l replicate apparently were most versus 20 pg TP 1-' at 13 wk, based on duplicate sub- adversely affected by water-column nitrate; after samples]. Further, in the N-l eelgrass with obvlous 14 wk NRase activity of N-l plants was much lower meristem deterioration, fungal hyphae were found than that of plants from other N-enriched or control after 14 wk in meristem cross-sections from 3 of 6 mesocosms (in 2 h assays, 250 nM NO2- g-' tissue fresh examined shoots, suggesting secondary invasion by an wt h-' in the N-l replicate, versus >2000 nM NO2- g-L opportunistic pathogen. Similar increases in water- fresh wt h-' in the other N-enriched replicate and 430 column TP, or of fungi in eelgrass meristems, were not Burkholder et al.: Effects of nitrate enrichment on seagrasses 133

cantly higher by control LTMA plants 2.0 500 with no prehistory of nitrate enrich- - 2 v, ment than by the previously enriched z 5 " 9 LTMA shoots (spring) under nitrate - 300 5 p$ 1.0 D loading in late summer-fall; the pre- g- 200 4 g vious nitrate exposure apparently F had weakened those plants so that 100 - their growth was significantly less 0.0 0 than that of LTMA controls (p < 0.05). PROTEIN CARBO. PROTEIN CARBO. CONTROI N-ENRICHED Eelgrass without nitrate enrichment prehistory also showed a trend for Fig. 15. Zostera marina. Total protein and acid-soluble (dissolved) carbohydrate decreased lateral growth relative content of recently transplanted eelgrass after 14 wk in the late summer-fall to controls without elevated nitrate experiment (means + 1 SE). 'Significantly higher tissue content (p < 0.05). Note that for acid-soluble carbohydrates, a standard curve was produced using (Fig. 16). D-glycogen and data were reported as my glycogen g-' dried plant powder In contrast to the negative effect of moderate water-column nitrate en- richment on Zostera marina (espe- observed in other N-enriched or control mesocosms; cially for the plants with 'pre-history' of nitrate enrich- fungal hyphae were noted in 1 of 6 shoots examined ment during spring), at the population level Halodule from N-2, but were not found in the control shoots. wrightii was mildly stimulated by nitrate (Fig. 16). This Eelgrass without nitrate enrichment prehistory species showed a small decline in shoot production by showed a trend for decreased lateral growth (net unenriched controls, and an increase in numbers of change in shoot density) under moderate nitrate en- enriched shoots (significantly higher numbers of richment in fall, although shoot production of control N-enriched shoots; p < 0.05). Z. marina, H. wrightiiand and enriched plants was not significantly different control Ruppia maritima increased in shoot density by (Fig. 16). The LTMA control Zostera marina produced < 50 % during the experiment. R. maritima, however, significantly more shoots than did recent field trans- was highly stimulated by pulsed moderate nitrate plant controls (p < 0.05). Lateral growth was signifi- loading and increased shoot production by more than 300% (significantly greater lateral growth than shown by controls, enriched Z. marina, or enriched H. wrightii; p < 0.05). 350 Comparison of tissue C, N, and P content in these 3 macrophyte species suggested differences in internal U^ U nutrient supply allocations. Like the nitrate-enriched 3250 Zostera manna, enriched Halodule wrightii and Rup- V pia maritima were significantly higher in N content. E. This elevated tissue N was reflected as higher C/N and N/P ratios for enriched Z, marina and R. maritima rela- c 150 tive to controls, indicating elevated nitrate uptake and 1 tissue N accumulation (p < 0.05; Figs. 13 & 14). In con- I- trast, enriched H. wrightii maintained similar tissue 8 50 C/N and N/P ratios as controls, and the belowground tissue P content of this species was significantly higher in the N-enriched regime (p < 0.05; Figs. 13 & 14). Con- -50 trol H. wrightii appeared to have innately higher nutri- LTMA ent content than the other 2 species; the control plants ZOSTERA ZOSTERA HAL0DVL.E RUPPIA were significantly higher in aboveground C, and in both above- and belowground N and P, than control Fig. 16. Zostera marina, Halodule wrightii, and Ruppia mar- itima. Shoot ~roduction(lateral arowth.- means + SE) over the Z. marina Or R. (P < 0.05; Fig. 13). Further- late summer-fall experiment, including long-term meso- belowground tissue C content was significantly cosm-acchated (LTMA) 2. manna with prehistory of water- depressed in N-enriched Z. marina relative to that of column nitrate enrichment (in spring),and recent transplants unenriched controls (p < 0.05, with a similar although without ennchment prehistory (initial and final dates com- pared as percent change in shoot numbers). 'Significantly non-significant trend in R. maritima), whereas H. hiaher., shoot ~roduction of control or N-enriched ~lants, ~rightiimaintained comparable belowground C with considering each of the 4 plant types separately (p < 0.05) and without water-column nitrate enrichment. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

DISCUSSION ing eelgrass decline (e.g. Salisbury & Ross 1978, North & Zimmerman 1984). The simulation represented by this experiment - The abiotic factors, warm temperature, elevated namely, estuarine eutrophication as nitrate enrich- water-column nitrate, and reduced light, acting alone ment, rather than as ammonium enrichment or as a or in concert, previously have been shown to adversely balance of N, and Pi enrichment - is analogous to pre- affect macrophytes. Declines in plant growth from sent conditions in many estuaries where seasonal P nitrate enrichment and imposed internal nutrient limitation is induced by high N, loading. Although sep- imbalances, as well as depressed carbohydrate synthe- tic effluent leachate, sewage and agricultural drainage sis, have been documented for terrestrial plants (Van all can be enriched in ammonium (Valiela et al. 1992). Quy et al. 1991, Aber 1992), as well as for Zostera a high percentage of the ammonium generally adsorbs marina (Burkholder et al. 1992). In Z. marina warm to particulate matter and settles out (Simon 1989), or is temperatures have been found to 'drain' carbon converted to nitrate as it is transported through oxy- reserves, resulting from associated high-respiration genated estuarine waters (Paasche 1988, Maier & demands (Burke & Dennison 1993) and from repressed Pregnall 1990; but see Lapointe & Clark 1992). Hence, activity of carbon translocation enzymes (Zimmerman estuaries draining agricultural/urban basins can be et al. 1989). Moreover, experiments by Burke & Denni- dominated by NO3- rather than NH4+,particularly dur- son (1993) present compelling evidence that reduced ing the critical spring growing season for Zostera Light during the spring growing season can cause sub- marina (Rudek et al. 1991, Valiela et al. 1992). Nitrate sequent eelgrass declines through decreased produc- is especially high relative to phosphorus in septic efflu- tion of the carbon reserves needed for plant survival ent that leaches to receiving coastal lagoons and upper during the warm summer period. These interacting embayments (Valiela & Costa 1988, Maier & Pregnall factors - water-column nitrate enrichment, warm tem- 1990. Valiela et al. 1990). Many estuaries additionally peratures, and reduced light availability - character- have received high nitrate loading from other anthro- ize many estuaries during mid-spring through early pogenic sources such as acid deposition and agricul- summer, and they should be examined for potential tural runoff to the extent that, in an increasing trend, synergism in promoting seasonal eelgrass habitat loss. such systems have seasonally shifted to primary limita- The enriched plants in N-3 from our cold-tempera- tion of plant growth by P rather than N, or to co-limita- ture spring 1992 experiment likely were influenced by tion by both N and P (Paerl et al. 1990, Rudek et al. the decrease in light availability that extended for a 1991, Magnien et al. 1992, Jaworski et al. 1992). 3 wk period (Burke & Dennison 1993), as well as by the During this unusually cold spring, low water-column elevated water-column nitrate. Small error bars in the nitrate enrichment (5 pM NO3--N d-', 12 wk) did not tissue data for N-enriched plants indicate that the 3 discernibly affect shoot densities of eelgrass, although replicates remained similar in total C, N, and P con- by the end of the experiment internal balances of nutri- tent following increased light availability in the N-3 ent supplies in N-enriched plants had shifted relative mesocosm; for example, belowground carbon content, to the nutrient content of unenriched controls. In previ- reflecting carbon storage, was comparably depressed ous research we demonstrated that during an unusu- among the plants from all 3 enriched mesocosms rela- ally warm spring (water temperatures averaging 4 "C tive to controls. Nonetheless, the N-3 plants were dis- above the 19 yr weekly mean, or ca 7 "C warmer than carded after the spring nitrate exposure to avoid the in spring 1992; taken from NOAA 1993) under other- potential confounding factor of the 3 wk difference in wise similar experimental conditions, Zostera marina former light regime when interpreting spring N- shoot densities decreased significantly after 8 wk with enriched plant response to subsequent nitrate enrich- only 3.5 pIv1 NO3--N in pulsed daily additions (Burk- ment. in the fall experiment, eeigrass with this prehis- holder et al. 1992). Similarly, during an unusually tory of water-column nitrate loading was adversely warm autumn (water temperatures 3°C above the affected by moderate nitrate additions, relative to the long-term weekly averages for 6 of 12 wk; NOAA unenriched controls. 1993), nitrate loading at 7 yM NO3--N d-' significantly In contrast, N-enriched eelgrass without prior expo- reduced lateral growth of recently transplanted Z. sure to elevated nitrate maintained a qualitative but manna relative to unennched controls (Burkholder et non-significant decrease in shoot density in compari- al. 1992). Under cooler temperatures in fall 1992, how- son to controls. Differences between plant duration in ever, recently transplanted eelgrass did not signifi- the mesocosms prevented statistical comparison of the cantly decline over a comparable experimental dura- LTMA populations from the spring-fall manipulation tion at 10 yM NO3--N d-l. Collectively, these findings with the more recently transplanted eelgrass. How- point to potential synergism between warm tempera- ever, the higher shoot growth shown by LTMA control tures and water-column nitrate enrichment in promot- plants relative to more recent field-transplanted con- Burkholder et al.: Effects of nitrate enrichment on seagrasses

trols suggests that the mesocosm environment did not major loading events could easily be missed because of negatively affect eelgrass, and that prehistory of removal (e.g. plant uptake and export processes; water-column nitrate enrichment may weaken Zostera Maier & Pregnall 1990, Rudek et al. 1991). As a sup- marina for survival under subsequent nitrate loading. plement to 'instantaneous' assessment of nutrient Pre-exposed plants would be at a disadvantage if, for regime on the basis of concentrations, indices based on example, the high carbon demand resulting from eelgrass tissue C, N and P content, or on ratios of these sustained nitrate uptake and conversion to amino acids nutrients, should be developed as parameters that by leaf tissue (Turpin et al. 1988, Turpin 1991) inter- integrate more long-term (days to weeks) fluctuations fered with carbohydrate synthesis or storage, or with in nutrient supplies for seagrasses in localized areas production of anti-microbial phenolics (Bazzaz et al. where nutrient enrichment is suspected (analogous to 1987). Although we observed no apparent overall use of Banks ex Konig tissue increase in the common pathogen Labyrinthula C:N:P content by Fourqurean et al. 1993 to infer zosterae on N-enriched eelgrass relative to controls, ecosystem- or regional-scale nutrient availability). this effect has been reported by other researchers In future work, determination of the fate of incorpo- (Buchsbaum et al. 1990). rated excess nitrate, including associated phosphorus The data from this study indicate that water-column demands and carbon 'sinks', will provide insights nitrate enrichment can change internal nutrient supply about the physiological mechanisms underlying inhi- balances and impair carbohydrate metabolism in bition of Zostera marina by elevated water-column Zostera marina. Enriched and control plants were com- nitrate. The mild/strong stimulatory effect of nitrate on parable in total protein content, but other N-containing Halodule wrightii and Ruppia maritima under moder- constituents were not measured; for example, excess ate enrichment suggests that unlike Zostera marina, nitrogen in the enriched eelgrass could have accumu- these species have developed more advantageous lated as free amino acids or other N-containing, non- physiological mechanisms for controlling nitrate proteinaceous components. The low NRase, high tis- uptake and assimilation from the water. H. wrightii sue N, extremely low aboveground tissue P, and and R. n~aritimaare considered to CO-exist with eel- meristem condition of the N-l plants collectively were grass on the North Carolina coast; their innate season- considered to provide evidence that these plants were ality is believed to preclude sustained competitive moribund after 14 wk of water-column nitrate loading. interactions with the more cold-optimal Z. marina Eelgrass from the N-2 replicate likely would have fol- (Thayer et al. 1984). In natural habitats under water- lowed a similar course, had the late summer-fall column nutrient enrichment from septic effluent experiment been extended. In previous experiments leachate and other sources, however, R. maritima and (Burkholder et al. 1992) and in N-l, the 'crumbling H. wrightii have been observed to survive where eel- meristem' condition of nitrate-enriched shoots pre- grass disappears from formerly mixed beds, without ceded plant death by 1 to 2 wk, and coincided with reappearance of Z. nlarina in colder seasons (Batiuk et significantly higher water-column total phosphorus al. 1992, Dennison et al. 1993, Burkholder unpubl. concentrations than in previous weeks. One possible data; but see Harlin & Thorne-Miller 1981). H. wrightii explanation is that the enriched eelgrass shoots lost and R. maritima have also been reported in abundance membrane structural integrity prior to death, resulting from nutrient-enriched or hypereutrophic tropical in substantial P leakage (reported, for example, in areas, rather than the more widespread tropical domi- stressed terrestrial plants prior to death; Levitt 1980). nant seagrass, Thalassia testudinum (Powell et al. Microbial pathogens could become opportunistic sec- 1991, Lapointe & Tomasko 1993). ondary invaders once plants were weakened from Our research indicates that in enriched locations stress imposed by internal nutrient supply imbalances, where eelgrass has declined, Halodule wrightii or Rup- as was noted particularly for enriched plants from the pia maritima might be successfully transplanted to re- N-l mesocosm. establish vegetated coastal habitat - at least, until the Mean water-column nitrate concentrations mea- nutrient loading became sufficiently high to support sured during our experiments were within the range of dense epiphyte or macroalgal growth that inhibited values commonly reported for estuaries under acceler- the underlying macrophytes (e.g. Lee & Olsen 1985, ated eutrophication (Rudek et al. 1991, Monbet 1992, Dunton 1990). Zostera marina is more sensitive to Neckles 1993). When considered against our known pulsed nitrate enrichment than either CO-inhabitant imposed loadings and concentration maxima, how- species, and likely would be replaced by H. wrightii or ever, these data suggest a critical need for improved R. maritima in mixed beds impacted by progressive techniques to evaluate actual nutrient exposure for nitrate enrichment. For Z. marina, confronted by pro- seagrasses, especially during sensitive growth periods. jected increases in nitrate loadng within many coastal Unless sampling was both well-timed and frequent, waters throughout the world (Miller 1992, World 136 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

Resources Institute 1992), suitable area for colonization Buchsbaum. R. N., Short, F. T., Cheney, D. P. (1990). Phenolic- is projected to decrease. Collectively, our findings from nitrogen interactions in eelgrass (Zostera marina L.): pos- 1990 and 1992 suggest that efforts to maintain or re- sible irnpllcations for disease resistance Aquat. Bot. 37: 29 1-297 eelgrass in warm- poorly eutrO~hic Borum, J (1985). Development of epiphytic communities on embayments and lagoons with seasonal anthropogenic eelgrass (Zostera marina) along a nutrient gradient in a nitrate loading will have low probability for long-term Danish estuary. Mar. Biol. 87: 211-218 success. Burke, M. K., Dennison, W. C. (1993). Seasonal variabon in the non-structural carbohydrate reserves of eelgrass Zostera marina L. and the influence of shading (Abstract). In: The science & management of coastal estuarine sys- Acknowledgments. Funding support for this research was tems. Proceedings, 12th Bienniel International Estuarine provided by the Office of Sea Grant, NOAA, U.S. Dept of Research Federation Conference, Hilton Head Island. SC, Commerce (Grant No. NA90AA-D-SG062) and the UNC Sea p. 15 Grant College (Project No. RIMER-1% and by the Albemarle- Burkholder, J. M,, Mason, K. M., Glasgow, H. B. Jr (1992). Pamlico Estuarine Study (NC Dept. of Environment, Health Water-column nitrate enrichment promotes decline of eel- & Natural Resources/U.S. EPA National Estuary Program) grass Zostera marina L.: evidence from seasonal meso- administered through the UNC Water Resources Research cosm experiments. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 61: 163-178 Institute, with additional support from the NC Agricultural Burkholder. J. M., Sheath, R. G. (1985). Characteristics of soft- Research Foundation (Project No. 06034), the NC Agricultural water streams in Rhode Island. I. A comparative analysis Research Service (Project No. 06188), and the Dept of Botany of physical and chemical variables. Hydrobiologia 128: at NCSU. We extend special thanks to B. J. Copeland for his 97-108 sustained enthusiasm and encouragement throughout our Dawes, C. J.. Kenworthy, W. J. (1990). Organic constituents. seagrass experiments. We are also grateful to R. Waite for his In: Phillips, R. C., McRoy, C. P. (eds.) Seagrass research interest and support of this research, to F. A. Cross for gra- methods. Monographs on Oceanographic Methodology, ciously hosting us on the NMFS grounds, and to D. Moreau, No. 9, Part I (Seagrasses). UNESCO, Paris, p. 87-98 R.HolmanandE.SenecaforcontributingtheircounselandDenHartog.C.(1970).Thesea-grassesoftheworld.North administrative support. In preparation for the 1992 experi- Holland, Amsterdam sediment exchange was accomplished with help from Dennison, W. C. (1987). Effects of light on seagrass photo- P. Bates, J. Compton. M. Mallin and J. Rudek. T. Williams synthesis, growth and depth distribution. Aquat. Bot. 27: assisted in installation of more powerful chillers. The electri- 15-26 cal system was redesigned with help from P. Bates, T. Brister, Dennison, W. C., Alberte, R. S. (1982). Photosynthetic J. Compton, D. Lewis, C. F. Johnson and J. Russell. M. responses of Zostera manna L. (eelgrass) to in situ manip- Fonseca is gratefully acknowledged for his assistance in ulations of light intensity. Oecologia 55: 51-61 transplanting efforts, as are J Russell and D. Lewis for their Dennison, W. C., Orth, R. J., Moore, K. A., Stevenson, J.C., sustained effort in helping us to troubleshoot the experimen- Carter, V., Kollar, S., Bergstrom, P. W., Batiuk, R. A. (1993). tal system. T Brister, V. Coleman, J. Compton, Sister G. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegeta- Rentchez, M McAuley, G. Morgan, L. Taggett and D. tlon. BioSci. 43: 86-94 (Everitt) Tan also aided in transplanting and in marking Dunton, K. H. (1990). Production ecology of Ruppia maritima plants. Sister G. Rentchis and T. Brister monitored the system L. s.1. and Halodule wnghtii Aschers. in two subtropical daily in heroic efforts, with additional assistance from V. estuaries. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 143: 147-164 Coleman, M. Mabn, L.Peterson, L.Taggett and D. Tan. D. Ferguson, R. L,hvera, J A., Wood, L. L. (1988).Submerged Kamykowskl and R. Reed provided a Technicon I1 autoana- aquatic vegetation in the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine lyzer for nitrate analysis. V. Clark, V. Coleman, J. Compton, System. Report No. 88-10 to the Albemarle-Parnhco Estu- C. F. Johnson, M. Larsen, L. Taggett and D. Tan assisted in arine Study. North Carolina Department of Environment, sample and data analyses. C. Brownie counseled us on statis- Health & Natural Resources, and the U.S. Environmental tics; and U. Blum, K. Bird, M. Mallin, M. McAulay and 2 Protection Agency - National Estuary Program, Raleigh, anonymous colleagues kindly critiqued the manuscript. NC Fourqurean, J. W., Zieman, J. C., Macko, S. A.. Holhbaugh. J. T., Moore, T (1993). Inferring ecosystem-scale patterns LITERATURE CITED of nutrient availability and sources using reglonal distnb- utions of C:N:P and I5N of seagrasses (Abstract). In: The Aber, J. D. (1992). Nitrogen cycling and nitrogen saturation in science & management of coastal estuarine systems. Pro- temperate forest ecosystems. TREE 7: 220-224 ceedings, 12th Bienniel International Estuarine Research Alberts, E. E., Moldenhauer, W. C. (1981).Nitrogen and phos- Federation Conference, Hilton Head Island, SC, p. 39 phorus transported by eroded soil aggregates. Soil Sci. Froellch, P. N. (1988). Kinet~ccontrol of dissolved phosphate Soc. Am. J. 45: 391-396 in natural rivers and estuaries: a primer on the phosphate Batiuk, R. A., Orth, R. J., Moore, K. A., Dennison, W. C., buffer mechanism. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 649-668 Stevenson, J. C., Staver, L. W., Carter, V., Rybicki, N. B., Gill, .l. L. (1978) Design and analysis of experiments in the Hickman, R E., Kollar, S., Bieber, S., Heasly, P. (1992). animal and medical sciences, Vols. 1, 2 and 3 Iowa State Chesapeake Bay submerged aquatic vegetation habitat University Press, Ames requirements and restoration targets: a technical synthe- Grobbelaar, J U. (1983). Availability to algae of N and P sis. Report CBP/TRS83/92. Chesapeake Bay Program, U.S. adsorbed on suspended solids in turbid waters of the Ama- Environmental Protection Agency, Annapolls zon hver. Arch. Hydrobiol. 96: 301-316 Bazzaz, F. A., Chiariello, N. R., Coley, P. D., Pitelka, L. F. Harlin, M. M., Thorne-Miller, B. (1981). Nutrient enrichment (1987). Allocating resources to reproduction and defense. of seagrass beds in a Rhode Island coastal lagoon. Mar. BioSci. 37: 58-67 Biol. 65: 221-229 Burkholder et al.: Effects of nlitrate enrichment on seagrasses 137

Jacobs, T. C., Gilliam, J. W. (1985). hparian losses of nitrate ture data for Beaufort Inlet. National Environmental Satel- from agricultural drainage waters. J. environ. Qual. 14: lite, Data and Information Service, and National Marine 472-478 Fisheries Service (W. Hettler), Beaufort, NC Jaworski. N. A., Groffman, P. M,, Keller, A. A., Prager, J C Neckles, H. A. (1993). Relative effects of nutrient enrichment (1992).A watershed nltrogen and phosphorus balance the and grazing on epiphyte-macrophyte (Zostera marina L.) upper Potomac River basin. Estuaries 15: 83-95 dynamics. Oecologia 93: 285-295 Kikuchi, T., Peres, J. M. (1977). Consun~erecology of seagrass Nienhu~s,P. H. (1992). Eutrophicat~on, water management, beds. In: McRoy, C. P., Helfferich. C. (eds.) Seagrass and the functioning of Dutch estuaries and coastal ecosystems - a scientific perspective. Marcel Dekker, lagoons. Estuaries 15: 538-548 New York, p. 147-193 North, W J., Zimmerman, R. C. (1984). Influences of macro- Lambers, H. (1985). Respirat~onin intact plant tissues: ~tsreg- nutnents and water temperatures on summertime survival ulation and dependence on environmental factors, metab- of Macrocystis canopies. Hydrobiologia 116/117: 419-424 olism and invaded organisms. In: Douce, R., Day, D. A. 01th. R. J., van Montfrans, J (1984). Epiphyte-seagrass rela- (eds.) Encyclopedia of plant physiology, New series. tionships with an emphasis on the role of micrograzing: a Higher plant cell respiration. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. review. Aquat. Bot. 18: 43-70 p. 418-474 Orth, R. J., Simons, J., Capelli, J., Carter, V., Hindman. L., Lapointe, B. E., Clark, M. W. (1992). Nutnent Inputs from the Hodges, S., Moore, K.,Rybick~, N. (1986). Distribution of watershed and coastal eutrophication In the Keys. submerged aquatic vegetation in the Chesapeake Bay and Estuaries 15: 465-476 tnbutaries - 1985. Final Report. Environ- Lapointe, B. E.. Tomasko, D. A. (1993). Trophic structuring of mental Protection Agency, Washington, DC marine plant communities in the Florida Keys (Abstract). Paerl, H. W., Mallin, M. A., Rudek, J., Bates, P. W. (1990). The In: The science & management of coastal estuarine sys- potential for eutrophication and nuisance algal blooms in tems. Proceedings, 12th Bienniel International Estuanne the Albemarle-Pamlico Estuary. Report No. 90-15 to the Research Federation Conference, Hllton Head Island, SC, Albemarle-Pamlico Estuarine Study. North Carolina p. 68 Department of Environment, Health & Natural Resources Lee, V., Olsen, S. (1985).Eutrophication and management ini- and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency - National tiatives for the control of nutrient inputs to Rhode Island Estuary Program. Raleigh, NC coastal lagoons. Estuaries 8. 191-202 Parsons, T R., Maita, Y., Lalli, C. M. (1985). A manual of Levitt, J. (1980). Responses of plants to environmental chemlcal and b~ological methods for seawater analysis. stresses. Vol. 11, Water, rad~ation,salt, and other stresses, Pergamon Press, New York 2nd edn. Academic Press. New York Paasche. E. (1988). Pelagic primary production in nearshore Magnien, R. E., Summers, R. M., Sellner, K. G. (1992). External waters. In: Blackburn, T. H., Sorensen, J. (eds.) Nitrogen nutrient sources, internal nutrient pools, and phytoplankton cycling in coastal marine environments. SCOPE 33. John production ln Chesapeake Bay. Estuanes 15: 497-516 Wiley & Sons, New York, p. 33-57 Maier, C. M., Pregnall, A. M. (1990). Increased macrophyte Penhale, P. (1977). Macrophyte-epiphyte biomass and pro- nitrate reductase activity as a consequence of ground- duct~v~tyin an eelgrass (Zostera manna L.) community. water input of nitrate through sandy beaches. Mar. Biol. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 26: 211-224 107: 263-271 Powell, G. V. N., Fourqurean, J. W., Kenworthy, W. J., Zie- Marsh, J. A., Dennison, W. C., Alberte, R. S. (1986). Effects of man, J. C. (1991). Bird colonies cause seagrass enrichment temperature on photosynthesis and respration in eelgrass in a subtropical estuary: observational and experimental (Zostera marina L.).J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 101: 257-267 evidence. Estuar. coast. Shelf Sci. 32: 609-623 Mather, T. (1988). Scientists seek to protect endangered sea- Pregnall, A. M., Smith, R. D.,Alberte, R S. (1987). Glutamine grasses. The News & Observer, Raleigh. NC, 24 August synthetase activity and free amino acid pools of eelgrass McRoy, C. P.. McMillan, C. (1977). Production ecology and (Zostera marina L.) roots. J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 106: physiology of seagrasses. In: McRoy, C. P., Helfferich, C. 211-228 (eds.) Seagrass ecosystems: a scientific perspective Mar- Roth, N. C., Pregnall, A M. (1988). Nitrate reductase activity cel Dekker, New York, p. 53-88 in Zostera marina. Mar. Biol. 99. 457-463 Miller, G. T. Jr (1992). Living in the environment, 7th edn. Rudek, J., Paerl, H. W., Mallin, M. A., Bates, P. W. (1991). Sea- Wadsworth, Belmont, CA sonal and hydrological control of phytoplankton nutrient Moffler, M. D., Durako, M. J. (1984). Axenic culture of Tha- limitation in the lower Neuse River Estuary, North Car- Iassia testudinum Banks ex Konig (Hydrocharitaceae). olina. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 75: 133-142 Am. J. Bot. 71. 1455-1460 Salisbury, F. B., Ross, C. W. (1978). Plant physiology, 2nd edn. Monbet, Y. (1992). Control of phytoplankton biomass in estu- Wadsworth, Belmont, CA aries: a comparative analysis of microtidal and macrotidal SAS Inst~tute,Inc. (1987). SAS/STAT guide for personal com- estuaries. Estuaries 15: 563-571 puters, version 6 edn. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC Morris, I. (1974). Nitrogen assimilation and protein synthesis. Schneider, H. (1988). Pathological anatomy and mycology. In: In: Stewart, W. D. P. (ed.)Algal physiology and biochem- Clark, G. (ed.) Staining procedures. Williams & Wilkins, istry. Botanical monographs, Vol. 10. University of Caldor- Baltimore, p. 367-373 nia Press, Berkeley, p. 583-609 Simon, N S. (1989), Nitrogen cycling between sedment and Muehlstein, L. K., Porter, D., Short, F. T (1991). Labyrinthula shallow-water column in the transition zone of the zosterae sp. nov., the causative agent of wasting disease of Potomac River and Estuary. 11. The role of wind-driven eelgrass, Zostera marina. Mycologia 83:180-191 resuspension and absorbed ammonium. Estuar. coast. Muenscher, W. C. (1964). Aquatic plants of the United States, Shelf Sci. 28: 531-547 2nd printing. Vail-Ballou Press, Inc., Binghamton, NY Stanley, D. H. (1988). Historical trends in nutrient loading to National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adrmnistration (NOAA) the Neuse River Estuary, N.C. American Water Resources (1993). Local climatic data - weekly and monthly sum- Association Symposium on Coastal Water Resources, maries for Beaufort, North Carolina, and water tempera- Wilmington, NC, p. 155-164 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 105: 121-138, 1994

Stevenson, J. C (1988). Comparative ecology of submersed Valiela, I.,Costa, J. E. (1988). Eutrophication of Buttermilk grass beds in freshwater, estuarine, and marine environ- Bay, a Cape Cod coastal embayrnent: concentrations of ments. Limnol. Oceanogr. 33: 867-893 nutnents and watershed nutrient budgets. Environ. Mgmt Thayer, G. W., Kenworthy, W. J., Fonseca, M. S. (1984). The 12: 539-553 ecology of eelgrass meadows of the Atlantic Coast: a com- Valiela. I., Costa. J. E., Foreman, K., Teal, J. M,, Howes. B., munity profile. United States Department of the Interior Aubrey, D. (1990). Transport of groundwater-borne nutri- Fish and Wildlife Service Report #FWS/OBS-84/02, Wash- ents from watersheds and their effects on coastal waters. ington, DC Biogeochemistry 10: 177-197 Thayer, G. W., Stuart, H. H., Kenworthy, W. J., Ustach, J. F., VaLiela, I.,Foreman, K., LaMontagne, M,, Hersh, D., Costa. J., Hall, A. B. (1979). Habitat values of salt , man- Peckol, P., DeMeo-Andreson, B., D'Avanzo, C., Babione, groves, and seagrasses for aquatic organisms. In: Greeson, M,, Sham, C.-H.,Brawley, J., Lajtha, K. (1992).Couplings P. E.,Clark, J. R.. Clark, J. E. (eds.] Wetland functions and of watersheds and coastal waters: Sources and conse- values: the state of our understanding. American Water quences of nutrient enrichment in Waquoit Bay, Massa- Resources Association, Minneapolis, p. 235-247 chusetts. Estuaries 15: 443-457 Turpin, D. H. (1991). Effects of inorganic N avdability on Williams. S. L.. Ruckelshaus, M. H. (1993). Effects of nitrogen algal photosynthesis and carbon metabolism. J. Phycol. availabihty and herbivory on eelgrass (Zostera marina) 27: 14-20 and epiphytes. Ecology 74: 904-918 Turpin, D. H., Elrifi, I. R., Birch, D. G., Weger, H. G., Holrnes, World Resources Institute (1992). Environmental almanac. J. J. (1988). Interactions between photosynthesis, respira- Houghton Mifflin Co., Boston tion, and nitrogen ass~milationin microalgae. Can. J. Bot. Zieman, J. C., Wetzel, R.G. (1980).Productivity in seagrasses: 66: 2083-2097 methods and rates. In: Phillips, R. C., McRoy, C. P. (eds.) Twilley, R. R.,Kemp. W. M., Staver, K. W., Stevenson, J. C., Handbook of seagrass biology: an ecosystem perspective. Boynton, W. R. (1985). Nutrient enrichment of estuarine Garland Press, New York, p. 87-1 16 submersed communities. 1. Algal growth Zimmerman, R. C., Smith, R. D., Alberte, R. S. (1989). Thermal and effects on production of plants and associated com- acclimation and whole-plant carbon balance in Zostera munities. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 23: 179-191 marina L. (eelgrass). J. exp. mar. Biol. Ecol. 130: 93-109

This article was presented by 3. Lawrence, Tampa, Manuscript first received: July 15, 1993 Florida, USA Rev~sedversion accepted: December 1, 1993