DOCSLIB.ORG

The CORA 5.2 Dataset for Global in Situ Temperature and Salinity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The CORA 5.2 Dataset for Global in Situ Temperature and Salinity The CORA 5.2 dataset for global in situ temperature and salinity measurements: data description and validation Tanguy Szekely, Jérôme Gourrion, Sylvie Pouliquen, Gilles Reverdin To cite this version: Tanguy Szekely, Jérôme Gourrion, Sylvie Pouliquen, Gilles Reverdin. The CORA 5.2 dataset for global in situ temperature and salinity measurements: data description and validation. Ocean Science, European Geosciences Union, 2019, 15 (6), pp.1601-1614. 10.5194/os-15-1601-2019. hal-02417887 HAL Id: hal-02417887 https://hal.sorbonne-universite.fr/hal-02417887 Submitted on 18 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Ocean Sci., 15, 1601–1614, 2019 https://doi.org/10.5194/os-15-1601-2019 © Author(s) 2019. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The CORA 5.2 dataset for global in situ temperature and salinity measurements: data description and validation Tanguy Szekely1, Jérôme Gourrion1, Sylvie Pouliquen2, and Gilles Reverdin3 1Societe Coopérative OceanScope, 115 rue Claude Chape, 29290, Plouzané, Brest, France 2IFREMER, BP 70, Plouzané, 29280, France 3Sorbonne-Université, CNRS/IRD/MNHN (LOCEAN), Paris, France Correspondence: Tanguy Szekely ([email protected]) Received: 17 December 2018 – Discussion started: 21 January 2019 Revised: 9 August 2019 – Accepted: 7 September 2019 – Published: 4 December 2019 Abstract. We present the Copernicus in situ ocean dataset 1 Introduction of temperature and salinity (version 5.2). Ocean subsurface sampling varied widely from 1950 to 2017 as a result of Estimating the temperature and salinity ocean state is critical changes in instrument technology and the development of in for documenting the evolution of the ocean and its role in situ observational networks (in particular, tropical moorings the present climate. To do so, the scientific community relies for the Argo program). Thus, global ocean temperature data on in situ measurements at a global scale and from global coverage on an annual basis grew from 10 % in 1950 (30 % datasets. for the North Atlantic basin) to 25 % in 2000 (60 % for the Among the global datasets, one can cite the World Ocean North Atlantic basin) and reached a plateau exceeding 80 % Database (Boyer et al., 2013; hereafter WOD) and the EN4 (95 % for the North Atlantic Ocean) after the deployment of database (Good et al., 2013; http://www.metoffice.org/, last the Argo program. The average depth reached by the profiles access: May 2018) distributed by the UK Meteorological Of- also increased from 1950 to 2017. The validation framework fice. Here, we present CORA (Coriolis Ocean dataset for is presented, and an objective analysis-based method is de- ReAnalysis), a dataset distributed by the Copernicus Ma- veloped to assess the quality of the dataset validation pro- rine Environment Monitoring Service (hereafter CMEMS) cess. Objective analyses (OAs) of the ocean variability are and produced by Coriolis. CORA differs from these ear- calculated without taking into account the data quality flags lier datasets in terms of choices in the construction and the (raw dataset OA), with the near-real-time quality flags (NRT production of the dataset. Indeed, WOD is validated with dataset OA), and with the delayed-time-mode quality flags the highest quality control methods at 102 vertical levels, (CORA dataset OA). The comparison of the objective analy- whereas the EN4 profiles are limited to a maximum of 400 sis variability shows that the near-real-time dataset managed vertical levels and are automatically validated (Ingleby and to detect and to flag most of the large measurement errors, re- Huddleston, 2007). CORA conversely retains data at the ducing the analysis error bar compared to the raw dataset er- highest vertical resolution. The choice of reducing the num- ror bar. It also shows that the ocean variability of the delayed- ber of levels in the data validation and in the dataset con- time-mode validated dataset is almost exempt from random- struction helps to quickly cluster new measurements in the error-induced variability. dataset and provides easy-to-handle datasets. On the other hand, these methodologies result in a loss of measurements potentially available for the scientific community through the vertical sampling of the profiles or in the data validation. In the construction of CORA, all the measurements available are kept, and then an automatic validation is first performed, followed by a manual and/or individual check (Gaillard et al., 2009; Cabanes et al., 2013). This validation framework Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 1602 T. Szekely et al.: The CORA 5.2 dataset requires the production of two datasets: a near-real-time val- to the community. Coriolis also collects XBT, CTD (con- idated dataset distributing the profiles within days after col- ductivity, temperature, depth), and XCTD measurements lection and a delayed-time validated dataset covering in year from French and European research programs as well as n the historical period up to year n − 1. This choice, made in from the Global Telecommunication System (GTS), Vol- the early versions of CORA, has been retained in the latest untary Ship System (VOS), and subtropical mooring net- one that we describe here. works (TAO/TRITON/RAMA/PIRATA programs from the A global ocean heat content (GOHC) increase has been Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory – PMEL). A ma- observed on decadal timescales, whether it is in the upper jor effort has also been made to include smaller datasets layers of the ocean (Domingues et al., 2008; Ishii and Ki- in the Coriolis dataset that are available in delayed-time moto, 2009; Levitus et al., 2009), below the thermocline (Von mode, such as ice-tethered profiler (ITP) and CTD profiles Schuckmann and Le Traon, 2011), or in the abyss (Purkey from the ICES program, sea mammal measurements from and Johnson, 2010). In addition to the influence of the map- MEOP (http://www.meop.net, last access: May 2018), and ping method and the baseline climatology (Abraham et al., validated surface drifter data. Delayed-time-mode measure- 2013; Cheng and Zhu, 2015; Boyer et al., 2016; Gouretski, ments have also been downloaded from the Word Ocean 2018), the data validation performed on in situ measurements Database (WOD13) and the French Service Hydrographique has a direct influence on the estimation of global ocean in- de la Marine (SHOM). It should be noted that in the case of a dicators such as GOHC, global freshwater content, and sea profile distributed by Coriolis in real-time mode and by one level height (Abraham et al., 2013; Gouretski, 2018). As an of these datasets in delayed-time mode, the delayed-time- example, differences in the GOHC estimation in the Johnson mode validated profile replaces the real-time-mode profile in et al. (2012) analysis compared to the Lyman et al. (2010) the CORA database. analysis have been shown to result from quality control is- Last, recent comparisons of the CORA profile positions sues. The particular case of expendable bathythermograph with the EN4 dataset (https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/, last ac- (XBT) measurement (Levitus et al., 2009; Cheng et al., 2016) cess: May 2018) have shown that some of the profiles dis- influence on the GOHC estimation is well documented. Sys- tributed in EN4 were not in the CORA previous versions. A tematic errors in other instrument types may also introduce partnership with the EN4 teams allowed us to detect and to systematic biases, leading to biases in the GOHC estimation import most of those profiles. A total of 5 069 864 profiles (Lyman et al., 2006; Willis et al., 2007). The validation of a have been imported in this way, covering the period 1950– quality control method is thus a critical task to ensure that the 2015. However, contrary to the other measurements, the pro- dataset flags are accurate enough to flag erroneous measure- files from the EN4 database are not reported with a pressure ments without biasing the dataset. The uncertainty surround- measurement, but instead with depth and with a maximum ing the quality assessment of a large oceanographic dataset number of reported levels in an individual profile set to 400. being a critical topic in ocean climate studies, we propose The issue of the inhomogeneity in the dataset with respect to here a method of global dataset quality assessment and ap- the vertical sampling will be discussed. ply it to near-real-time validated and delayed-time-mode val- idated datasets. We will first list the data sources of the CORA measure- 3 Dataset description ments in Sect. 2. A description of the CORA data space and time repartition will be reported on Sect. 3. Then, the quality CORA aims to provide a comprehensive dataset of in situ control procedure will be described in Sect. 4. Lastly, grid- temperature and salinity measurements from 1950 to 2017. ded temperature and salinity fields are calculated using an The oceanic temperature and salinity measuring instruments objective mapping that is presented in Sect. 5. The results of have, however, radically changed during the last 70 years. the dataset validation and quality assessment are finally dis- As a result, the origin and characteristics of data distributed cussed in Sect. 6. in the CORA dataset widely vary in time (Fig. 1). Most of the profiles collected prior to 1965 are mechanical bathythermo- graph (MBT) measurements or Nansen casts.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The CMCC Global Ocean Physical Reanalysis System (C-GLORS
    Research Papers Issue RP0211 The CMCC Global Ocean Physical December 2013 Reanalysis System (C-GLORS) Divisione Applicazioni Numeriche e Scenari version 3.1: Configuration and basic validation By Andrea Storto SUMMARY Ocean reanalyses are data assimilative simulations designed Junior Scientist [email protected] for a wide range of climate applications and downstream applications. An eddy-permitting global ocean reanalysis system is in continuous and Simona Masina Head of ANS Division development at CMCC and we describe here the configuration of the [email protected] reanalysis system (version 3.1) recently used to produce an ocean reanalysis for the altimetry era (1993-2011), which was released in December 2013. The system includes i) a three-dimensional variational analysis system able to assimilate all the in-situ observations of temperature and salinity along with altimetry data and ii) a weekly model integration performed by the NEMO ocean model coupled with the LIM2 sea-ice model and forced by the ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis. We detail the configuration of both the components. The validation results performed in a coordinated way are summarized in the paper, and suggest that the overall performance of the reanalysis is satisfactory, while a few problems linked to the sea-ice concentration minima and the sea level data assimilation still remain and are being improved for the next release. Ocean Climate The research leading to these results has received funding from the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research and the Italian Ministry of Environment, Land and Sea under the GEMINA project and from the European Commission Copernicus programme, previously known as GMES programme, under the MyOcean and MyOcean2 projects.
    [Show full text]
  • The CORA Dataset: Validation and Diagnostics of Ocean Temperature and Salinity in Situ Measurements C
    Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Ocean Sci. Discuss., 9, 1273–1312, 2012 www.ocean-sci-discuss.net/9/1273/2012/ Ocean Science doi:10.5194/osd-9-1273-2012 Discussions © Author(s) 2012. CC Attribution 3.0 License. This discussion paper is/has been under review for the journal Ocean Science (OS). Please refer to the corresponding final paper in OS if available. The CORA dataset: validation and diagnostics of ocean temperature and salinity in situ measurements C. Cabanes1, A. Grouazel1, K. von Schuckmann2, M. Hamon3, V. Turpin4, C. Coatanoan4, S. Guinehut5, C. Boone5, N. Ferry6, G. Reverdin2, S. Pouliquen3, and P.-Y. Le Traon3 1Division technique de l’INSU, UPS855, CNRS, Plouzane,´ France 2CNRS, LOCEAN, Paris, France 3Laboratoire d’Oceanographie´ Spatiale, IFREMER, Plouzane,´ France 4SISMER, IFREMER, Plouzane,´ France 5CLS-Space Oceanography Division, Ramonville Saint-Agne, France 6MERCATOR OCEAN, Ramonville St Agne, France Received: 1 March 2012 – Accepted: 8 March 2012 – Published: 21 March 2012 Correspondence to: C. Cabanes ([email protected]) Published by Copernicus Publications on behalf of the European Geosciences Union. 1273 Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Discussion Paper | Abstract The French program Coriolis as part of the French oceanographic operational sys- tem produces the COriolis dataset for Re-Analysis (CORA) on a yearly basis which is based on temperature and salinity measurements on observed levels from different 5 data types. The latest release of CORA covers the period 1990 to 2010. To qualify this dataset, several tests have been developed to improve in a homogeneous way the quality of the raw dataset and to fit the level required by the physical ocean re-analysis activities (assimilation and validation).
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation of Four Global Ocean Reanalysis Products for New Zealand Waters–A Guide for Regional Ocean Modelling
    New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research ISSN: 0028-8330 (Print) 1175-8805 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/tnzm20 Evaluation of four global ocean reanalysis products for New Zealand waters–A guide for regional ocean modelling Joao Marcos Azevedo Correia de Souza, Phellipe Couto, Rafael Soutelino & Moninya Roughan To cite this article: Joao Marcos Azevedo Correia de Souza, Phellipe Couto, Rafael Soutelino & Moninya Roughan (2020): Evaluation of four global ocean reanalysis products for New Zealand waters–A guide for regional ocean modelling, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, DOI: 10.1080/00288330.2020.1713179 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2020.1713179 Published online: 22 Jan 2020. Submit your article to this journal View related articles View Crossmark data Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tnzm20 NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH https://doi.org/10.1080/00288330.2020.1713179 RESEARCH ARTICLE Evaluation of four global ocean reanalysis products for New Zealand waters–A guide for regional ocean modelling Joao Marcos Azevedo Correia de Souza a, Phellipe Coutoa, Rafael Soutelinob and Moninya Roughanc,d aA division of Meteorological Service of New Zealand, MetOcean Solutions, Raglan, New Zealand; bOceanum Ltd, Raglan, New Zealand; cMeteorological Service of New Zealand, Auckland, New Zealand; dSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY A comparison between 4 (near) global ocean reanalysis products is Received 10 June 2019 presented for the waters around New Zealand.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Newsletter – Special Issue with Coriolis
    Mercator Ocean - CORIOLIS #37 – April 2010 – Page 1/55 Quarterly Newsletter - Special Issue Mercator Océan – Coriolis Special Issue Quarterly Newsletter – Special Issue with Coriolis This special issue introduces a new editorial line with a common newsletter between the Mercator Ocean Forecasting Center in Toulouse and the Coriolis Infrastructure in Brest. Some papers are dedicated to observations only, when others display collaborations between the 2 aspects: Observations and Modelling/Data assimilation. The idea is to wider and complete the subjects treated in our newsletter, as well as to trigger interactions between observations and modelling communities Laurence Crosnier, Sylvie Pouliquen, Editor Editor Editorial – April 2010 Greetings all, Over the past 10 years, Mercator Ocean and Coriolis have been working together both at French, European and international level for the development of global ocean monitoring and forecasting capabilities. For the first time, this Newsletter is jointly coordinated by Mercator Ocean and Coriolis teams. The first goal is to foster interactions between the french Mercator Ocean Modelling/Data Asssimilation and Coriolis Observations communities, and to a larger extent, enhance communication at european and international levels. The second objective is to broaden the themes of the scientific papers to Operational Oceanography in general, hence reaching a wider audience within both Modelling/Data Asssimilation and Observations groups. Once a year in April, Mercator Ocean and Coriolis will publish a common newsletter merging the Mercator Ocean Newsletter on the one side and the Coriolis one on the other side. Mercator Ocean will still publish 3 other issues per year of its Newsletter in July, October and January each year, more focused on Ocean Modeling and Data Assimilation aspects.
    [Show full text]
  • North Atlantic Extratropical and Subpolar Gyre Variability During the Last 120 Years: a Gridded Dataset of Surface Temperature, Salinity, and Density
    Ocean Dynamics https://doi.org/10.1007/s10236-018-1240-y North Atlantic extratropical and subpolar gyre variability during the last 120 years: a gridded dataset of surface temperature, salinity, and density. Part 1: dataset validation and RMS variability Gilles Reverdin1 & Andrew Ronald Friedman2 & Léon Chafik3 & Naomi Penny Holliday4 & Tanguy Szekely5 & Héðinn Valdimarsson6 & Igor Yashayaev7 Received: 5 September 2018 /Accepted: 26 November 2018 # Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018 Abstract We present a binned annual product (BINS) of sea surface temperature (SST), sea surface salinity (SSS), and sea surface density (SSD) observations for 1896–2015 of the subpolar North Atlantic between 40° N and 70° N, mostly excluding the shelf areas. The product of bin averages over spatial scales on the order of 200 to 500 km, reproducing most of the interannual variability in different time series covering at least the last three decades or of the along-track ship monitoring. Comparisons with other SSS and SST gridded products available since 1950 suggest that BINS captures the large decadal to multidecadal variability. Comparison with the HadSST3 SST product since 1896 also indicates that the decadal and multidecadal variability is usually well-reproduced, with small differences in long-term trends or in areas with marginal data coverage in either of the two products. Outside of the Labrador Sea and Greenland margins, interannual variability is rather similar in different seasons. Variability at periods longer than 15 years is a large part of the total interannual variability, both for SST and SSS, except possibly in the south- western part of the domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Main Processes of the Atlantic Cold Tongue Interannual Variability Yann Planton, Aurore Voldoire, Hervé Giordani, Guy Caniaux
    Main processes of the Atlantic cold tongue interannual variability Yann Planton, Aurore Voldoire, Hervé Giordani, Guy Caniaux To cite this version: Yann Planton, Aurore Voldoire, Hervé Giordani, Guy Caniaux. Main processes of the Atlantic cold tongue interannual variability. Climate Dynamics, Springer Verlag, 2018, 50 (5-6), pp.1495-1512. 10.1007/s00382-017-3701-2. hal-01867602 HAL Id: hal-01867602 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01867602 Submitted on 4 Sep 2018 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Y. Planton et al. Climate Dynamics DOI 10.1007/s00382-017-3701-2 Main processes of the Atlantic cold tongue interannual variability Yann Planton, Aurore Voldoire, Hervé Giordani, Guy Caniaux CNRM-UMR1357, Météo-France/CNRS, CNRM-GAME, Toulouse, France e-mail: [email protected] Abstract The interannual variability of the Atlantic cold tongue (ACT) is studied by means of a mixed- layer heat budget analysis. A method to classify extreme cold and warm ACT events is proposed and applied to ten various analysis and reanalysis products. This classification allows five cold and five warm ACT events to be selected over the period 1982-2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Newsletter #36 – January 2010 – Page 1
    Mercator Ocean Quarterly Newsletter #36 – January 2010 – Page 1 GIP Mercator Ocean Quarterly Newsletter Editorial – January 2010 Figure: 1992-2007 Sea Surface Temperature (ºC) time series in the Nino3.4 Box in the Equatorial Pacific for various Ocean Reanalyses. MCT2 stands for Mercator Kalman filtering (PSY2G) system reanalysis. MCT3 stands for Mercator 3D-Var reanalysis (assimilation of altimetry and insitu profiles). SST comparison in all reanalyses shows a relatively robust interannual variability. SST uncertainty is stable with time. Credits: A. Fischer, CLIVAR/GODAE Ocean Reanalyses Intercomparison Meeting. Greetings all, This month’s newsletter is devoted to data assimilation and its application to Ocean Reanalyses. Brasseur is introducing this newsletter telling us about the history of Ocean Reanalyses, the need for such Reanalyses for MyOcean users in particular, and the perspective of Ocean Reanalyses coupled with biogeochemistry or regional systems for example. Scientific articles about Ocean Reanalyses activities are then displayed as follows: First, Cabanes et al. are presenting CORA, a new comprehensive and qualified ocean in-situ dataset from 1990 to 2008, developped at the Coriolis Data Centre at IFREMER and used to build Ocean Reanalyses. A more comprehensive article will be devoted to the CORA dataset in our next April 2010 issue. Then, Remy at Mercator in Toulouse considers large scale decadal Ocean Reanalysis to assess the improvement due to the variational method data assimilation and show the sensitivity of the estimate to different parameters. She uses a light configuration system allowing running several long term reanalysis. Third, Ferry et al. present the French Global Ocean Reanalysis (GLORYS) project which aims at producing eddy resolving global Ocean Reanalyses with different streams spanning Mercator Ocean Quarterly Newsletter #36 – January 2010 – Page 2 GIP Mercator Ocean different time periods and using different technical choices.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Detecting Regional Deep Ocean Warming Below 2000M Based on Altimetry
    1 1 Detecting regional deep ocean warming below 2000m based on altimetry, 2 GRACE, Argo, and CTD data 3 Yuanyuan YANG1,2, Min ZHONG1,2,3, Wei FENG*1,3 Dapeng MU4 4 1 State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute of Geodesy and 5 Geophysics, Innovation Academy for Precision Measurement Science and 6 Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430077, China. 7 2 University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. 8 3 School of Geospatial Engineering and Science, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 9 519082, China. 10 4Institute of Space Sciences, Shandong University, Weihai 264209, China. 11 ABSTRACT 12 The deep ocean below 2000m is a large water body with the sparsest data coverage, 13 challenging the closure of sea level budget and estimate of the Earth’s energy 14 imbalance. Whether the deep ocean below 2000m is warming globally has been debated 15 in the recent decade. However, as the regional signals are generally larger than global 16 average, it is intriguingin to investigate press the regional temperature changes. Here we adopt 17 an indirect method that combines altimetry, GRACE, and Argo data to examine the 18 global and regional deep ocean temperature changes below 2000m. The consistency 19 between high quality conductivity-temperature-depth (CTD) data from repeated *Corresponding author: Wei FENG Email: [email protected]) 2 20 hydrographic sections and our results confirms the validity of the indirect method. We 21 find that the deep oceans are warming in the Middle East Indian Ocean, subtropical 22 North and Southwest Pacific, and Northeast Atlantic, but cooling in the Northwest 23 Atlantic and Southern oceans from 2005 to 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • Ocean Modelling 162 (2021) 101794
    Ocean Modelling 162 (2021) 101794 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean Modelling journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocemod Influence of ocean tides and ice shelves on ocean–ice interactions and dense shelf water formation in the D'Urville Sea, Antarctica Pierre-Vincent Huot a,<, Thierry Fichefet a, Nicolas C. Jourdain b, Pierre Mathiot c,b, Clément Rousset d, Christoph Kittel e, Xavier Fettweis e a Earth and Life Institute, George Lemaitre Centre for Earth and Climate Research, UCLouvain, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium b Université Grenoble Alpes, CNRS/IRD/G-INP, IGE, Grenoble, France c UK MetOffice, Exeter, United Kingdom d LOCEAN, IPSL, Paris, France e Laboratory of Climatology, Department of Geography, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium ARTICLEINFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The D'Urville Sea, East Antarctica, is a major source of Dense Shelf Water (DSW), a precursor of Antarctic East Antarctica Bottom Water (AABW). AABW is a key water mass involved in the worldwide ocean circulation and long- Sea ice term climate variability. The properties of AABW in global climate models suffer from several biases, making Ocean climate projections uncertain. These models are potentially omitting or misrepresenting important mechanisms Ice shelves involved in the formation of DSW, such as tides and ocean–ice shelf interactions. Recent studies pointed out Tides Dense Shelf Water that tides and ice shelves significantly influence the coastal seas of Antarctica, where AABW originates from. Yet, the implications of these two processes in the formation and evolution of DSW are poorly understood, in particular in the D'Urville Sea. Using a series of NEMO-LIM numerical simulations, we assess the sensitivity of dense water formation in the D'Urville Sea to the representation of tides and ocean–ice shelf interactions during the years 2010–2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The CORA Dataset: Validation and Diagnostics of In-Situ Ocean Temperature and Salinity Measurements
    Ocean Sci., 9, 1–18, 2013 www.ocean-sci.net/9/1/2013/ Ocean Science doi:10.5194/os-9-1-2013 © Author(s) 2013. CC Attribution 3.0 License. The CORA dataset: validation and diagnostics of in-situ ocean temperature and salinity measurements C. Cabanes1,*, A. Grouazel1, K. von Schuckmann2, M. Hamon3, V. Turpin4, C. Coatanoan4, F. Paris4, S. Guinehut5, C. Boone5, N. Ferry6, C. de Boyer Montegut´ 3, T. Carval4, G. Reverdin2, S. Pouliquen3, and P.-Y. Le Traon3 1Division Technique de l’INSU, UPS855, CNRS, Plouzane,´ France 2Laboratoire d’Oceanographie´ et du Climat: Experimentations´ et Approches Numeriques,´ CNRS, Paris, France 3Laboratoire d’Oceanographie´ Spatiale, IFREMER, Plouzane,´ France 4SISMER, IFREMER, Plouzane,´ France 5CLS-Space Oceanography Division, Ramonville St. Agne, France 6MERCATOR OCEAN, Ramonville St. Agne, France *now at: Institut Universitaire Europeen´ de la Mer, UMS3113, CNRS, UBO, IRD, Plouzane,´ France Correspondence to: C. Cabanes ([email protected]) Received: 1 March 2012 – Published in Ocean Sci. Discuss.: 21 March 2012 Revised: 9 November 2012 – Accepted: 29 November 2012 – Published: 10 January 2013 Abstract. The French program Coriolis, as part of the French not an easy one to achieve in reality, especially with in- operational oceanographic system, produces the COriolis situ oceanographic data such as temperature and salinity. dataset for Re-Analysis (CORA) on a yearly basis. This These data have as many origins as there are scientific ini- dataset contains in-situ temperature and salinity profiles from tiatives to collect them. Efforts to produce such ideal global different data types. The latest release CORA3 covers the datasets have been made for many years, especially since period 1990 to 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Ocean Observing and Monitoring Activities: Focus on the NEAR-GOOS
    Global ocean observing and monitoring activities: Focus on the NEAR-GOOS Hee-Dong Jeong East Sea Fisheries Research Institute National Fisheries Research & Development Institute, Korea 2nd International Symposium: Effects of Climate Change on the World’s Oceans, May 13-20, 2012, Yeosu, Korea Outline Project Description and Management NEAR-GOOS in its’ first phase Implementation of the 2nd phase Products Future works Project Description and Management Project description North East Asian Regional - Global Ocean Observing System (NEAR- GOOS) is a regional pilot project of GOOS in the North-East Asian Region, implemented by China, Japan, the Republic of Korea and the Russian Federation as one activity of IOC Sub-Commission for the Western Pacific (WESTPAC). Euro Euro GOOS GOOS US GOOS Med Black Sea NEAR GOOS GOOS GOOS A GOOS- SEA IOCARIBE F AFRICA GOOS R IO GOOS I GOOS PI-GOOS G OCEATL C WA GOOS AN R A GOOS A S P Project management The 14th Session of the IOC/WESTPAC Co-ordinating Committee for the North-East Asian Regional/Global Ocean Observing System (NEAR-GOOS) 8-9 September 2011, Tianjin, China NEAR-GOOS in its’ first phase NEAR-GOOS was conceived in 1995 and initiated in 1996 upon the formal adoption of the NEAR-GOOS Implementation Plan and Operational Manual by the 29th Executive Council of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC) following a recommendation from the WESTPAC Regional Sub commission of IOC earlier in the year. It became one of the first regional pilot projects of GOOS. The primary aim of the project in its first phase was to facilitate the sharing of oceanographic data in order to improve the availability of information and ocean services in the region.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparison of Langmuir Turbulence Parameterizations and Key Wave T Effects in a Numerical Model of the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans Alfatih Alia,B,*, Kai H
    Ocean Modelling 137 (2019) 76–97 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean Modelling journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocemod A comparison of Langmuir turbulence parameterizations and key wave T effects in a numerical model of the North Atlantic and Arctic Oceans Alfatih Alia,b,*, Kai H. Christensenb,e, Øyvind Breivikb,d, Mika Malilaa, Roshin P. Raja, Laurent Bertinoa, Eric P. Chassignetc, Mostafa Bakhoday-Paskyabia a Nansen Environmental and Remote Sensing Center, Thormøhlensgate 47, 5006 Bergen, Norway b Norwegian Meteorological Institute, Norway c Center for Ocean-Atmospheric Prediction Studies, FL, USA d Geophysical Institute, University of Bergen, Norway e Department of Geosciences, University of Oslo, Norway ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Five different parameterizations of Langmuir turbulence (LT) effect are investigated in a realistic modelofthe Langmuir mixing parameterization North Atlantic and Arctic using realistic wave forcing from a global wave hindcast. The parameterizations Mixed layer depth mainly apply an enhancement to the turbulence velocity scale, and/or to the entrainment buoyancy flux in the Sea surface temperature surface boundary layer. An additional run is also performed with other wave effects to assess the relative Ocean heat content importance of Langmuir turbulence, namely the Coriolis-Stokes forcing, Stokes tracer advection and wave- Stokes penetration depth modified momentum fluxes. The default model (without wave effects) underestimates the mixed layerdepthin summer and overestimates it at high latitudes in the winter. The results show that adding LT mixing reduces shallow mixed layer depth (MLD) biases, particularly in the subtropics all year-around, and in the Nordic Seas in summer. There is overall a stronger relative impact on the MLD during winter than during summer.
    [Show full text]