DOCSLIB.ORG

NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond a Message from Sean O’Keefe

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond a Message from Sean O’Keefe September 8, 2003 NASA’s Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond A periodically updated document demonstrating our progress toward safe return to flight and implementation of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board recommendations NASA’s Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond A periodically updated document demonstrating our progress toward safe return to flight and implementation of the Columbia Accident Investigation Board recommendations September 8, 2003 An electronic version of this implementation plan is available at www.nasa.gov NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond A Message From Sean O’Keefe Shortly after the tragic loss of Mike Anderson, David Brown, Kalpana Chawla, Laurel Clark, Rick Husband, Willie McCool, Ilan Ramon, and the Space Shuttle Columbia, I committed on behalf of the NASA family that we would find the cause of the terrible disaster, fix it, and safely fly again. To do less would be a disservice to the memory of the STS-107 crew. In order to achieve the first objective, I assigned a group of distinguished, uniquely qualified individuals led by Admiral Harold W. Gehman, Jr. (USN-Ret.) to form the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) and determine the cause of this tragic event. The CAIB thoroughly and intensely examined the cause of the accident and recently issued its exhaustive report and recommendations, completing our first objec- tive. We deeply appreciate the personal sacrifice that the CAIB members and staff have made over the last seven months in conducting this extraordinary investigation. NASA and the entire nation are in their debt. Now we embark on the second objective—to fix the problems identified by the CAIB. In this, our Return to Flight Implementation Plan, we embrace the CAIB report and its recommendations as our roadmap to do so. But we will not stop there. We have also undertaken to raise the bar above the CAIB recommendations. In this plan, we have included critical actions to respond to our own internal review as well as observations from external sources that will make flying the Space Shuttle safer. This plan is intended to be a living document and will be modified as progress is accomplished or as other safety concerns require. When the fixes are completed and the Space Shuttle is fit to fly safely, then, and only then, will we be able to meet our third objective—return to flight. In the meantime, I offer this plan as a tribute to the memory of the STS-107 crew who were dedicated to the NASA vision and devoted their lives to further it. It is our job to see their vision through. Sean O’Keefe NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond Return to Flight Message from the Space Flight Leadership Council The Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) Report has provided NASA with a roadmap “to resume our journey into space.” The recommendations “reflect the Board’s strong support for return to flight at the earliest date consistent with the overriding objective of safety.” NASA fully accepts the Board’s findings and will comply with its recommendations. To do this, the NASA Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond outlines the path that NASA will take to respond to the CAIB Report. It is a “living document” that will be continually updated to record NASA’s progress toward safe return to flight as well as activities to institutionalize the technical, managerial, cultural, communications, and safety changes necessary to sustain safe flight operations for as long as the Space Shuttle’s unique capabilities are needed. This implementation plan addresses each CAIB recommendation with a specific plan of action. Recommendations identified as return to flight by the CAIB or NASA must be completed before resuming Space Shuttle flight operations. All other recommendations and their implementation timing and strategies are included as well. We are beginning a new chapter in NASA’s history, recommitted to excellence in all aspects of our work, strengthening our culture, and enhancing our technical capabilities. In doing so, we will ensure that the legacy of Columbia continues as we strive to improve the safety of human space flight. Smarter, stronger, safer! Dr. Michael A. Greenfield, Ph.D. William F. Readdy Associate Deputy Administrator Associate Administrator for Technical Programs for Space Flight NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond Contents Summary . ix Overview . ix Response Summaries . xv CAIB Recommendations Implementation Schedule . xxv Part 1 – NASA’s Response to the Columbia Accident Investigation Board’s Recommendations 3.2-1 External Tank Thermal Protection System Modifications . 1-1 3.3-2 Orbiter Hardening . 1-11 3.3-1 Reinforced Carbon-Carbon Nondestructive Inspection . 1-15 6.4-1 Thermal Protection System On-Orbit Inspect and Repair . 1-19 3.3-3 Entry with Minor Damage . 1-25 3.3-4 Reinforced Carbon-Carbon Database . 1-27 3.3-5 Minimizing Zinc Primer Leaching . 1-29 3.8-1 Reinforced Carbon-Carbon Spares . 1-31 3.8-2 Modeling Reviews . 1-33 3.4-1 Ground-Based Imagery . 1-35 3.4-2 Downlink Post-Separation . 1-39 3.4-3 On-Vehicle Ascent Imagery . 1-41 6.3-2 National Imagery and Mapping Agency Memorandum of Agreement . 1-45 3.6-1 Update Modular Auxiliary Data System . 1-47 3.6-2 Modular Auxiliary Data System Redesign . 1-49 vii NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond Contents 4.2-2 Enhance Wiring Inspection Capability . 1-51 4.2-1 Solid Rocket Booster Bolt Catcher . 1-53 4.2-3 Closeout Inspection . 1-57 4.2-4 Micrometeoroid and Orbital Debris Risk . 1-59 4.2-5 Foreign Object Debris Processes . 1-61 6.2-1 Scheduling . 1-63 6.3-1 Mission Management Team Improvements . 1-65 7.5-1 Independent Technical Engineering Authority . 1-67 7.5-2 Safety and Mission Assurance Organization . 1-67 7.5-3 Reorganize Space Shuttle Integration Office . 1-69 9.1-1 Detailed Plan for Organizational Changes . 1-67 9.2-1 Mid-Life Recertification . 1-73 10.3-1 Digitize Closeout Photographs . 1-75 10.3-2 Engineering Drawing Update . 1-77 Part 2 – Raising the Bar – Other Corrective Actions SSP-1 Quality Planning and Requirements Document/Government Mandated Inspection Point . 2-1 SSP-2 Public Risk of Overflight . 2-3 SSP-3 Contingency Shuttle Crew Support . 2-5 SSP-4 Acceptable Risks . 2-7 SSP-5 Critical Debris Sources . 2-9 SSP-6 Waivers, Deviations, and Exceptions . 2-11 SSP-7 NASA Accident Investigation Team Working Group Findings . 2-13 SSP-8 Certification of Flight Readiness Improvements . 2-15 SSP-9 Failure Mode and Effects Analyses/ Critical Items Lists . 2-17 SSP-10 Contingency Action Plans . 2-19 Appendix A – NASA’s Return to Flight Process Appendix B – Return to Flight Task Group viii NASA's Implementation Plan for Return to Flight and Beyond Summary Overview The Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) updated to reflect changes to the plan and progress toward report has provided NASA with the roadmap for moving implementation of the CAIB recommendations, and our forward with our return to flight efforts. The CAIB, return to flight plan. through its diligent work, has determined the causes of the accident and provided a set of comprehensive recom- In addition to providing recommendations, the CAIB mendations to improve the safety of the Space Shuttle has also issued observations. Follow-on appendices may Program. NASA accepts the findings of the CAIB, we provide additional comments and observations from the will comply with the Board’s recommendations, and we Board. In our effort to raise the bar, NASA will thor- embrace the report and all that is included in it. This oughly evaluate and conclusively determine appropriate implementation plan outlines the path that NASA will actions in response to all these observations and any other take to respond to the CAIB recommendations and safely suggestions we receive from a wide variety of sources, return to flight. including from within the Agency, Congress, and other external stakeholders. At the same time that the CAIB was conducting its assessment, NASA began pursuing an intensive, Agency- Through this implementation plan, we are not only fixing wide effort to further improve our human space flight the causes of the Columbia accident, we are beginning a programs. We are taking a fresh look at all aspects of the new chapter in NASA’s history. We are recommitting to Space Shuttle Program, from technical requirements to excellence in all aspects of our work, strengthening our management processes, and have developed a set of inter- culture and improving our technical capabilities. In doing nally generated actions that complement the CAIB so, we will ensure that the legacy of Columbia guides us as recommendations. we strive to make human space flight as safe as we can. NASA will also have the benefit of the wisdom and guid- Key CAIB Findings ance of an independent, advisory Return to Flight Task Group, led by two veteran astronauts, Apollo commander The CAIB focused its findings on three key areas: Thomas Stafford and Space Shuttle commander Richard • Systemic cultural and organizational issues, Covey. Members of this Task Group were chosen from including decision making, risk management, among leading industry, academia, and government experts. and communication; Their expertise includes knowledge of fields relevant to safety and space flight, as well as experience as leaders and • Requirements for returning safely to flight; and managers of complex systems.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council
    NAC Planetary Science Subcommittee, January 26-27, 2011 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council January 26-27, 2011 NASA Headquarters Washington, D.C. Meeting Minutes ____________________ ____________________ Jonathan Rall Ronald Greeley Executive Secretary Chair, Planetary Science Subcommittee 1 NAC Planetary Science Subcommittee, January 26-27, 2011 Table of Contents Welcome 3 NAC Science Committee Review of Analysis Groups 3 NLS II Update 3 Mars Exploration Program 4 Status of EJSM 5 Planetary Science Division Status 6 MESSENGER: Options for an EM 8 Q&A period with SMD AA 9 CAPTEM 10 LEAG 11 MEPAG 11 OPAG 12 VExAG 13 Discussion 14 NASA Chief Scientist Introduction 14 SBAG 15 SR&T 16 Draft report discussion 18 Technology Review Panel 19 Discussion and wrap-up 21 Appendix A- Agenda Appendix B- Membership Appendix C- Attendees Appendix D- List of Presentations Meeting report prepared by: Joan M. Zimmermann, Zantech IT 2 NAC Planetary Science Subcommittee, January 26-27, 2011 January 26, 2011 Welcome Dr. Ronald Greeley, Chair of the Planetary Science Subcommittee (PSS) opened the meeting. Members introduced themselves and agenda items were briefly reviewed. Dr. Greeley acknowledged members who would be cycling off the subcommittee by March 1, 2011; these were Drs. Cravens, Herzog, Johnson, and Slavin. Dr. James Green, Director of the Planetary Science Division (PSD) added his commentary, noting that this would be a critical meeting as Congress debates budget particulars that will undoubtedly impact the division. He added that he wished to ensure that PSD continue to perform top science tasks with guidance from PSS.
    [Show full text]
  • Lori Garver, NASA Deputy Administrator SOFIA Joining Forces Event Joint Base Andrews September 22, 2011
    Lori Garver, NASA Deputy Administrator SOFIA Joining Forces Event Joint Base Andrews September 22, 2011 Good afternoon. My name is Lori Garver, Deputy Administrator at NASA. I want to thank our German Aerospace Center partners and Joint Base Andrews for organizing this event and especially for making it possible for students and the children of military families to see this unique flying observatory up close. And let me just take a moment to commend First Lady Michelle Obama and Jill Biden for devoting their time and energy in encouraging all Americans to do more in support of the wives, husbands, sons, daughters and other family members of our men and women in uniform who are defending our freedom around the world. 1 I want to also welcome any and all Members of Congress who are here today. And a special hello to Mary Blessing, an astronomy teacher at Herndon High School -- one of only six American teachers selected to work with scientists aboard SOFIA and to share that experience with their students. I know you are all eager to tour this magnificent aircraft, so I am only going to speak briefly then turn it over to my colleagues, Paul Hertz, NASA’s Chief Scientist in our Science Mission Directorate; and Leland Melvin, our Associate Administrator for Education and a former astronaut. Paul and Leland will speak more about the amazing scientific and educational value of SOFIA, but let me just tell you that this project is a key component of NASA’s science objectives. 2 It will help us zoom in close on some of the most fundamental questions of the universe: Where did we come from? How was our solar system formed? And what else is out there? It is fitting that SOFIA means “wisdom” in Greek.
    [Show full text]
  • Entire Issue (PDF)
    E PL UR UM IB N U U S Congressional Record United States th of America PROCEEDINGS AND DEBATES OF THE 113 CONGRESS, FIRST SESSION Vol. 159 WASHINGTON, MONDAY, FEBRUARY 4, 2013 No. 16 House of Representatives The House met at 2 p.m. and was lic for which it stands, one nation under God, The Navy has told us too it will can- called to order by the Speaker. indivisible, with liberty and justice for all. cel maintenance on 23 ships, reduce fly- f f ing hours on deployed aircraft carriers by 55 percent, cancel submarine deploy- TIME TO SUBMIT A CREDIBLE PRAYER ments, and reduce steaming days by 22 PLAN The Chaplain, the Reverend Patrick percent. J. Conroy, offered the following prayer: (Ms. FOXX asked and was given per- The Bipartisan Policy Center has Eternal God, we give You thanks for mission to address the House for 1 warned us that 1 million jobs will be giving us another day. minute and to revise and extend her re- lost if sequester happens. We thank You that we are a Nation marks.) What is the response of the majority fashioned out of diverse peoples and Ms. FOXX. Mr. Speaker, families party? The Budget chair, Mr. RYAN, cultures, brought forth on this con- budget, small businesses budget, cities simply said, ‘‘Sequester is going to tinent in a way not unlike the ancient budget, churches budget, schools budg- happen. We can’t afford to lose those people of Israel. As out of a desert, You et, my state of North Carolina budgets, cuts.’’ led our American ancestors to this but Washington does not.
    [Show full text]
  • Dall W. Forsythe
    Preface Dall W. Forsythe n 1998, two of America’s top experts in public management agreed that government’s use of performance management de- Iserved a searching and critical review. Those experts were Rich- ard P. Nathan, director of the Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government, and Paul Light, then a program director at The Pew Charitable Trusts. This book is one of the products of their agree- ment. As the bibliography in this volume demonstrates, the literature on performance management and measurement in the public sector is extensive. Most of the authors writing in this field advocate in- creased use of performance management systems, and see them as indispensable tools for improving management and accountability in government. Light and Nathan, however, were concerned that too little attention had been given to the problems of “managing for re- sults,” as performance management is sometimes known. As de- tailed in the cases and analyses in this volume, performance management initiatives in government face difficulties in implemen- tation in the best of circumstances. At their worst, they create incen- tives for unexpected or even undesirable behavior by agency managers and front-line personnel. vii Quicker, Better, Cheaper? Managing Performance in American Government To look more deeply into the problems and possibilities of per- formance management systems, The Pew Charitable Trusts and the Rockefeller Institute brought together a group of experts in public policy and management to discuss these issues. An effort was made to include critics as well as enthusiasts. In addition to Nathan and Light, members of the Task Force included: ] Walter Broadnax, dean of the School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington.
    [Show full text]
  • Ames - 75 Years of World Leadership in Science and Technology on Aug
    April 2014 - A Quarterly Publication Ames - 75 years of world leadership in science and technology On Aug. 4, 1939, the U.S. Senate passed a bill that included funding for a new National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) research sta- tion, where advanced research facilities would be built to develop future flight technologies. Almost 20 years later, the NACA research laboratory became part of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Today, 75 years after its inception, NASA’s Ames Research Center at Moffett Field, Mountain View, Calif., continues its world leadership in science and technology. As part of our celebration to commemorate Ames and its glorious past, the Astrogram will publish a series of feature stories depicting past research projects and facilities. To all those who have been an integral part of our past and present, Happy 75th anniversary Ames! See historic Ames photos on page 6 Atmospheric science: NASA Ames’ early contribution to our home planet (part one) The prospect of war was the driv- ing force for Ames’ first research authorization, a study to protect airplanes from the hazards of icing while flying. In 1941, Ames researchers flew a Curtiss C-46 (left) as a flying de-icing research laboratory, to study atmospheric conditions. Wom- en are pictured in the photo, one in the cockpit and two standing with tools in hand. NACA photo BY RUTH DASSO MARLAIRE In 1941, Ames researchers flew a spaceflight program. He refused to Atmospheric research and air- Curtiss C-46 as a flying de-icing fund NASA at the 1960s level, but he borne science campaigns have been research laboratory to study atmo- did approve the start of NASA’s space strengths of NASA’s Ames Research spheric conditions, including liquid- shuttle program.
    [Show full text]
  • Grunsfeld, John M
    Biographical Data Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center National Aeronautics and Houston, Texas 77058 Space Administration May 2016 JOHN M. GRUNSFELD (PH.D., RET) ASSOCIATE ADMINISTRATOR, SCIENCE MISSION DIRECTORATE NASA HEADQUARTERS Pronunciation: JON GRUNS-feld PERSONAL DATA: Born in Chicago, Illinois. Married to the former Carol E. Schiff. They have two children. John enjoys mountaineering, flying, sailing, bicycling and music. His father, Ernest A. Grunsfeld III, resides in Highland Park, Illinois. Carol’s parents, David and Ruth Schiff, reside in Highland Park, Illinois. EDUCATION: Graduated from Highland Park High School, Highland Park, Illinois, in 1976; received a bachelor of science degree in physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 1980; a master of science degree and a doctor of philosophy degree in physics from the University of Chicago in 1984 and 1988, respectively. ORGANIZATIONS: American Astronomical Society, American Alpine Club, Explorers Club, Experimental Aircraft Association, Aircraft Owners and Pilot Association. SPECIAL HONORS: W.D. Grainger Fellow in Experimental Physics, 1988 to 1989; NASA Graduate Student Research Fellow, 1985 to 1987; NASA Space Flight Medals (1995, 1997, 1999 and 2002); NASA Exceptional Service Medals (1997, 1998 and 2000); NASA Distinguished Service Medal (2002); Distinguished Alumni Award, University of Chicago; Alumni Service Award, University of Chicago; Komarov Diploma (1995); Korolov Diploma (1999 and 2002); NASA Constellation Award (2004); Society of Logistics Engineers and Space Logistics Medal (2006). EXPERIENCE: Dr. Grunsfeld’s academic positions include that of Visiting Scientist, University of Tokyo/Institute of Space and Astronautical Science (1980 to 1981); Graduate Research Assistant, University of Chicago (1981 to 1985); NASA Graduate Student Fellow, University of Chicago (1985 to 1987); W.D.
    [Show full text]
  • Vita: James F. Bell Iii (Jim)
    VITA: JAMES F. BELL III (JIM) Professor, Arizona State University School of Earth and Space Exploration Box 876004; Building: ISTB-4, Room: 681 Tempe, AZ 85287-6004 phone: (480) 965-1044; fax: (480) 965-8102 email: [email protected] web: http://jimbell.sese.asu.edu EDUCATION: Ph.D.: 1992, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Planetary Geosciences M.S.: 1989, University of Hawaii at Manoa; Geology and Geophysics B.S.: 1987, California Institute of Technology; Planetary Science and Aeronautics PERSONAL INFORMATION: Born: July 23, 1965, Providence RI; Citizenship: USA. FIELDS OF EXPERTISE: • Surface composition and geology of terrestrial planets, moons, asteroids, comets • Spacecraft instrumentation, testing, operations (multispectral imaging & spectroscopy) • Reflectance & emittance spectroscopy (telescopic, laboratory, spacecraft) • Image processing and data reduction/calibration/analysis (telescopic, spacecraft) PROFESSIONAL EXPERIENCE: Since 2018: Chief Scientist, MILO Space Science Institute (http://miloinstitute.org) Since 2018: Graduate Faculty, ASU School for the Future of Innovation in Society's PhD program in Human and Social Dimensions of Science and Technology Since 2013: Distinguished Visiting Scientist, NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory/Caltech Since 2013: Director, ASU Space Technology and Science ("NewSpace") Initiative Since 2011: Professor, Honors Faculty, School of Earth & Space Exploration, ASU Since 2011: Adjunct Professor, Department of Astronomy, Cornell University 2009-2010: Professor, Department of Astronomy, Cornell University 2003-2008: Associate Professor, Department of Astronomy, Cornell University 2005: Visiting Scientist, CNRS/Observatoire Midi-Pyrénées, Toulouse, France 1998-2003: Assistant Professor, Department of Astronomy, Cornell University 1997 to 1998: Senior Research Associate, Department of Astronomy, Cornell 1995 to 1997: Research Associate, Department of Astronomy, Cornell 1994 to 1995: Postdoctoral Research Assistant, U.
    [Show full text]
  • ASTRONAUTICS and AERONAUTICS, 1977 a Chronology
    NASA SP--4022 ASTRONAUTICS AND AERONAUTICS, 1977 A Chronology Eleanor H. Ritchie ' The NASA History Series Scientific and Technical Information Branch 1986 National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, DC Four spacecraft launched by NASA in 1977: left to right, top, ESA’s Geos 1 and NASA’s Heao 1; bottom, ESA’s Isee 2 on NASA’s Isee 1, and Italy’s Wo. (NASA 77-H-157,77-H-56, 77-H-642, 77-H-484) Contents Preface ...................................................... v January ..................................................... 1 February .................................................... 21 March ...................................................... 47 April ....................................................... 61 May ........................................................ 77 June ...................................................... 101 July ....................................................... 127 August .................................................... 143 September ................................................. 165 October ................................................... 185 November ................................................. 201 December .................................................. 217 Appendixes A . Satellites, Space Probes, and Manned Space Flights, 1977 .......237 B .Major NASA Launches, 1977 ............................... 261 C. Manned Space Flights, 1977 ................................ 265 D . NASA Sounding Rocket Launches, 1977 ..................... 267 E . Abbreviations of References
    [Show full text]
  • NASA's Space Shuttle Columbia
    Order Code RS21408 Updated February 19, 2003 CRS Report for Congress Received through the CRS Web NASA’s Space Shuttle Columbia: Quick Facts and Issues for Congress Marcia S. Smith Specialist in Aerospace and Telecommunications Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Summary On February 1, 2003, NASA’s Space Shuttle Columbia broke apart while returning to Earth from a 16-day science mission in orbit. All seven astronauts — six Americans and one Israeli — were killed. An investigation is underway. This report provides quick facts about Columbia, her crew, the STS-107 mission, the status of the investigation, and a brief discussion of issues for Congress. Additional information on the space shuttle program is available in CRS Issue Brief IB93062. CRS Reports RS21411 and RS21419 describe space shuttle funding, and provide excerpts from recent reports and hearings on shuttle safety, respectively. This report will be updated often. The Loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia The space shuttle Columbia was launched on its STS-107 mission on January 16, 2003. After completing a 16-day scientific research mission, Columbia started its descent to Earth on the morning of February 1, 2003. As it descended from orbit, approximately 16 minutes before its scheduled landing at Kennedy Space Center, FL, Columbia broke apart over northeastern Texas. All seven astronauts aboard were killed. They were Commander Rick Husband; Pilot William McCool; Mission Specialists Michael P. Anderson, David M. Brown, Kalpana Chawla, and Laurel Clark; and payload specialist Ilan Ramon, an Israeli. The last communication with Columbia was at about 09:00 EST. The shuttle was at an altitude of 207,135 feet, traveling at a speed of Mach 18.3 (about 13,000 miles per hour).
    [Show full text]
  • Kritser Conference Room, Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport 10801 Airport Blvd Amarillo, Texas
    CITY OF AMARILLO, TEXAS NOTICE OF MEETING & AGENDA AIRPORT ADVISORY BOARD Regular Meeting to be held on Monday, October 9, 2017 at 10:30 A.M. in the Kritser Conference Room, Rick Husband Amarillo International Airport 10801 Airport Blvd Amarillo, Texas. Please note: The Airport Advisory Boardmay take items out of the ordershown on the Agenda. Allor part of any agenda item may be discussed in an executive session at any time during a meeting, as may be necessary and allowed by state law. Votes or final decisions are made only in open Regular or Special meetings, not in a worksession or executive session. REGULAR MEETING 1. Minutes: Approval of the Airport Advisory Board minutes of the regular meeting held on July 10, 2017. 2. Consider and Recommendation: Consider authorizing display of artwork in terminal building and take appropriate action. 3. Presentation and Discussion of Airport Activities and Projects: a. Master Plan Status b. Minimum Standards/Rules/Regulations Update c. Apron Isolated Panel Replacement d. CCTV and Access Control System Timeline e. Air Service Development Initiatives / Airline Update f. Mechanical System Upgrade g. FAA Part 139 Certification Inspection h. East End Drainage Project i. Customer Impression Projects i. Rental Car Return Sign ii. Airport Entrance Sign/Flag Pole iii. Bag Claim Area and CVC Display iv. Rick Husband/NASA Tribute Area j. Industrial Aviation Development k. Special Use Airspace Consideration I. Ground Transportation and TNCs m. Marketing Efforts 4. Public Forum: Interested citizens may comment on matters pertaining to policies, programs or services of the Department of Aviation or this Board that are not on this agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • ASK the Academy Volume 3 Anthology
    ASK THE ACADEMY VOLUME 3 ANTHOLOGY TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT ASK THE ACADEMY ..................................................................................................... 5 MESSAGES FROM THE ACADEMY DIRECTOR .......................................................................... 7 THE POWER OF A VISION .................................................................................................. 7 T RENDS IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT ................................................................................. 7 KNOWLEDGE EXPLOSION ................................................................................................... 8 LESSONS FROM TORINO .................................................................................................... 9 C HANGE MANAGEMENT AND ADAPTIVE CHALLENGES .................................................... 9 V IRTUAL PROJECT TEAMS AND LEARNING ..................................................................... 10 THE GOOD IDEA PARADOX .............................................................................................. 11 ACADEMY BRIEFS .................................................................................................................... 13 PM CHALLENGE LEADERSHIP ROUNDUP ....................................................................... 13 PM CHALLENGE INTERNATIONAL FORUM ROUNDUP .................................................... 14 J EAN-JACQUES DORDAIN ON GLOBAL OPPORTUNITIES AND CHALLENGES ................ 15 M ASTERS WITH MASTERS EVENT HIGHLIGHTS INTERNATIONAL
    [Show full text]
  • GRADUATE CATALOG 2014 - 2015 2014-2015 Graduate Catalog Amendments (Revised 7/9/14)
    GRADUATE CATALOG 2014 - 2015 2014-2015 Graduate Catalog Amendments (Revised 7/9/14) (pg. 16) Types of Admission 4. Probationary Admission. In certain exceptional cases, a student who does not meet the minimum grade point average requirement, but who presents other evidence of ability to succeed in a graduate program, may be granted probationary admission by the dean of the School of Graduate and Professional Studies or his/her designee. The probationary status may be removed after the student has demonstrated academic ability by maintaining a “B” average for the first six credit hours of graduate courses, with no grade lower than a “B”. (pg. 172) School of Graduate and Professional Studies Remove: Victoria Guerra Administrative Assistant, Master of Healthcare Administration/Master of Public Affairs Add: Master of Public Affairs (after Rebekkah Stuteville, Ph.D.) Victoria Guerra Administrative Assistant, Master of Healthcare Administration/Master of Public Affairs GRADUATE CATALOG 2014-2015 Park University School of Graduate and Professional Studies 911 Main, Suite 900 Kansas City, MO 64105 (816) 559-5625 www.park.edu/grad The information contained in this Park University Graduate Catalog may be modified at any time at the University’s discretion when deemed necessary or desirable to better carry out the University’s purposes and objectives. This catalog contains informational material only. Neither the provisions of this catalog, nor the acceptance of students through registration and enrollment in the University, constitute a contract or an offer to enter into a contract. Fees, deadlines, academic requirements, courses, degree programs, academic policies and other information in this catalog may be changed without notice.
    [Show full text]