DOCSLIB.ORG

TRUMP from 11/2015 to Date

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
TRUMP from 11/2015 to Date This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC 20224 PRIVACY, GOVERNMENTAL LIAISON AND DISCLOSURE December 02 , 2016 John Greenewald, Jr. Dear John Greenewald, Jr.: This is a final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated June 24, 2016 that we received on June 27, 2016. You asked for a copy of records, electronic or otherwise, of all emails to or from Commissioner John Koskinen that contain the following key word: TRUMP from 11/2015 to date. Of the 44 pages located in response to your request, I am enclosing 44 pages. I am withholding 5 pages in part and zero pages in full. We are withholding the 5 pages in part under FOIA exemption 6. FOIA exemption 6 exempts from disclosure files that, if released, would clearly be an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy. We base the determination to withhold on a balancing of interests between the protection of an individual's right to privacy and the public's right to access government information. The redacted portions of each page are marked by the applicable FOIA exemptions. This constitutes a partial denial of your request. I have enclosed Notice 393 explaining your appeal rights. Please note that the commissioner, as part of his daily briefings, receives emailed summaries of published news articles, pertaining to tax administration, compiled by the IRS and other sources. Many of these daily emails contain news articles that include the name "Trump". We have not provided these emails as we assume your request was not meant to retrieve this type of email. Please let us know if this is not the case. If you have any questions please call Tax Law Specialist, Francisca Eyetsemitan, ID # 1000591343, at 617-316-2271, or write to: Internal Revenue Service, Centralized Processing Unit- Stop 211, P.O. Box 621506, Atlanta, GA 30362. Please refer to case number F16179-0006. 2 Sincerely, ~A~/ /}- ~ Byron D Endo Disclosure Manager Disclosure Office 12 Enclosures Responsive Documents Notice 393 ~l\\ Department of the Treasury Civil Procedure 4(i). In addition to service upon the United States, as set forth in Rule 4(i)(1), service must ~&J/1 Internal Revenue Service be made upon the Internal Revenue Service by Notice 393 registered or certified mail as set forth in Rule 4(i)(2)(A). (Rev. September 2016) The address of the Internal Revenue Service is: Internal Information on an IRS Determination to Revenue Service, Attention CC:PA, 1111 Constitution Withhold Records Exempt From Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20224. The Freedom of Information Act- 5 U.S.C. 552 Exemptions Appeal Rights The Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. 552, does not You may file an appeal with the Internal Revenue Service apply to matters that are: (IRS) within 90 days after we (1) deny you access to a record in whole or in part; (2) have made an adverse (b)(1) • specifically authorized under criteria established determination as to your category as a requester; (3) by an Executive order to be kept secret in the interest of deny your request for a fee waiver or reduction; or (4) national defense or foreign policy and are in fact have advised you that no records responsive to your properly classified under such executive order, request exist. You may file an appeal within 10 days when a request for expedited processing has been (b)(2) • related solely to the internal personnel rules and denied. practices of an agency, Your appeal must be in writing, must be signed by you, (b)(3) • specifically exempted from disclosure by statute and must contain: (other than section 552b of this title), provided that the statute: Your name and address, • Description of the requested records, (A) requires that the matters be withheld from the public • Date of the request (and a copy, if possible),D in such a manner as to leave no discretion on the • Identity of the office and contact on the response issue, or letter, and • Date of the letter denying the request (and a copy, if (B) establishes particular criteria for withholding or possible) refers to particular types of matters to be withheld. Mail your appeal to: Note: Internal Revenue Code sections 61 03 and 61 05 are statutes which qualify for exemption 3 treatment. IRS Appeals Section 6103 protects the confidentiality of tax returns Attention: FOIA Appeals and information pertaining to a taxpayer collected by M/Stop 55202 the IRS. Section 6105 protects information obtained 5045 E. Butler Ave. from a foreign country under a tax treaty. Fresno, California 93727-5136 (b)(4) • trade secrets and commercial or financial Judicial Review information obtained from a person and privileged or confidential, If we deny your appeal, or do not address an issue raised in your appeal within 20 days (excluding (b)(5) • inter-agency or intra-agency memorandums or Saturdays, Sundays, or legal public holidays) after the letters which would not be available by law to a party date we receive your appeal, you may file a complaint in other than an agency in litigation with the agency, United States District Court in the district in which (1) you reside; (2) your principal place of business is (b)(6) • personnel and medical files and similar files the located; (3) the records are located; or (4) the District of disclosure of which would constitute a clearly Columbia. A complaint may be filed within 1 0 days unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (excluding Saturdays, Sundays, or legal public holidays) after the date we receive your appeal if your appeal is (b)(7) • records or information compiled for law from an adverse determination of a request for enforcement purposes, but only to the extent that the expedited processing. If you choose to file suit before production of such law enforcement records or receipt of a final determination by the Appeals office, the information: administrative appeals process may cease. (A) could reasonably be expected to interfere with The rule for effecting service of judicial process upon the enforcement proceedings, Internal Revenue Service is set forth in Federal Rule of Notice 393 (Rev. 9-2016) Cat. No. 45803X (B) would deprive a person of a right to a fair trial or an impartial adjudication, (C) could reasonably be expected to constitute an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy, (D) could reasonably be expected to disclose the identity of a confidential source, including a State, local or foreign agency or authority or any private institution which furnished information on a confidential basis, and, in the case of a record or information compiled by a criminal law enforcement authority in the course of a criminal investigation or by an agency conducting a lawful national security intelligence investigation, information furnished by a confidential source, (E) would disclose techniques and procedures for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions, or would disclose guidelines for law enforcement investigations or prosecutions if such disclosure could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law, or (F) could reasonably be expected to endanger the life or physical safety of any individual. (b)(8) • contained in or related to examination, operating, or condition reports prepared by, on behalf of, or for the use of an agency responsible for the regulation or supervision of financial institutions, or (b)(9) • geological and geophysical information and data, including maps, concerning wells. Notice 393 (Rev. 9-2016) Cat. No. 45803X Page: 1 Wassenaar Russell D From: Koskinen John A Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 1:20 PM To: Fred Wertheimer Subject: RE : FYI I share your views, which go along with the Satchel Paige corollary of not looking back. There are those who maintain this is all a conspiracy between the Freedom Cause and my wife, Pat, to get me home. Thanks again for the support. John From: Fred Wertheimer [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 6:36 PM To: Koskinen John A Subject: RE: FYI Well at least they are off impeachment. That's progress of a sort. I am aware of the House Committee planned action on Wednesday and I am working to put together some outside opposition to this I am always taken by the old saying, "life isn't easy, and then you die." I am hopeful that this not relevant for either of us at our tender ages. Fred Fred Wertheimer Democracy 21 2000 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Phone: 202-355-9600 Fax: 202-355-9606 Follow me on Twitter Like Democracy 21 on Facebook From: Koskinen John A [mailto:[email protected] ] Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 5:42 PM To: Fred Wertheimer Subject: RE: FYI Fred, Many thanks for the support. As you'll see in the upcoming press, the House Oversight Committee has now moved on to voting on Wednesday on a censure resolution, which is the first time in 120 years this has been used against anyone not in the House. And for House members, there have only been five cases in the last 90 years, and then the vote only occurred on the floor after Page:2 full hearings and consideration, including due process for the respondent. In this case, they pla n to just go straight to the floor.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Examining the Allegations of Misconduct Against Irs Commissioner John Koskinen (Part Ii)
    EXAMINING THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT AGAINST IRS COMMISSIONER JOHN KOSKINEN (PART II) HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 22, 2016 Serial No. 114–74 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 20–521 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin JERROLD NADLER, New York LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas ZOE LOFGREN, California STEVE CHABOT, Ohio SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas DARRELL E. ISSA, California STEVE COHEN, Tennessee J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., STEVE KING, Iowa Georgia TRENT FRANKS, Arizona PEDRO R. PIERLUISI, Puerto Rico LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas JUDY CHU, California JIM JORDAN, Ohio TED DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah KAREN BASS, California TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania CEDRIC RICHMOND, Louisiana TREY GOWDY, South Carolina SUZAN DelBENE, Washington RAU´ L LABRADOR, Idaho HAKEEM JEFFRIES, New York BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island DOUG COLLINS, Georgia SCOTT PETERS, California RON DeSANTIS, Florida MIMI WALTERS, California KEN BUCK, Colorado JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DAVE TROTT, Michigan MIKE BISHOP, Michigan SHELLEY HUSBAND, Chief of Staff & General Counsel PERRY APELBAUM, Minority Staff Director & Chief Counsel (II) C O N T E N T S JUNE 22, 2016 Page OPENING STATEMENTS The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia, and Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary ................................
    [Show full text]
  • Irs Obstruction: Lois Lerner’S Missing Emails
    IRS OBSTRUCTION: LOIS LERNER’S MISSING EMAILS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 23, 2014 Serial No. 113–129 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://www.house.gov/reform VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:15 Sep 15, 2014 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 6011 Sfmt 6011 C:\DOCS\89598.TXT APRIL IRS OBSTRUCTION: LOIS LERNER’S MISSING EMAILS VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:15 Sep 15, 2014 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 6019 Sfmt 6019 C:\DOCS\89598.TXT APRIL IRS OBSTRUCTION: LOIS LERNER’S MISSING EMAILS HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION JUNE 23, 2014 Serial No. 113–129 Printed for the use of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.fdsys.gov http://www.house.gov/reform U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 89–598 PDF WASHINGTON : 2014 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Aug 31 2005 11:15 Sep 15, 2014 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 C:\DOCS\89598.TXT APRIL COMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT AND GOVERNMENT REFORM DARRELL E. ISSA, California, Chairman JOHN L. MICA, Florida ELIJAH E.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS Reform: Politics As Usual?
    Maurer School of Law: Indiana University Digital Repository @ Maurer Law Articles by Maurer Faculty Faculty Scholarship 2016 IRS Reform: Politics as Usual? Leandra Lederman Indiana University Maurer School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub Part of the Organizations Law Commons, and the Tax Law Commons Recommended Citation Lederman, Leandra, "IRS Reform: Politics as Usual?" (2016). Articles by Maurer Faculty. 2401. https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/facpub/2401 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Scholarship at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Articles by Maurer Faculty by an authorized administrator of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. IRS REFORM: POLITICS AS USUAL? Leandra Lederman* Abstract The IRS is still reeling from accusations that it "targeted" Tea Party and other non-profit organizations. Although multiple government investigations found no politically motivated behavior-onlymismanagement-Congressional hearings were quite inflammatory. Congress recently followed up those hearings with a set of IRS reforms. Congress's approach is reminiscent of the late 1990s, when highly publicized Congressional hearings regarding alleged abuses by the IRS resulted in a major IRS reform and restructuring, although the allegations subsequently were largely debunked. This Article argues that the recent allegations against the IRS also were overblown. It looks to the aftermath of the 1998 IRS reform, which included a major downturn in enforcement, for lessons for the present day. The Article concludes that Congress as a whole can do a betterjob of keeping politics from undermining tax administration.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Allegations of Misconduct Against Irs Commissioner John Koskinen (Part I)
    EXAMINING THE ALLEGATIONS OF MISCONDUCT AGAINST IRS COMMISSIONER JOHN KOSKINEN (PART I) HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FOURTEENTH CONGRESS SECOND SESSION MAY 24, 2016 Serial No. 114–73 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://judiciary.house.gov U.S. GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE 20–233 PDF WASHINGTON : 2016 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Publishing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY BOB GOODLATTE, Virginia, Chairman F. JAMES SENSENBRENNER, JR., JOHN CONYERS, JR., Michigan Wisconsin JERROLD NADLER, New York LAMAR S. SMITH, Texas ZOE LOFGREN, California STEVE CHABOT, Ohio SHEILA JACKSON LEE, Texas DARRELL E. ISSA, California STEVE COHEN, Tennessee J. RANDY FORBES, Virginia HENRY C. ‘‘HANK’’ JOHNSON, JR., STEVE KING, Iowa Georgia TRENT FRANKS, Arizona PEDRO R. PIERLUISI, Puerto Rico LOUIE GOHMERT, Texas JUDY CHU, California JIM JORDAN, Ohio TED DEUTCH, Florida TED POE, Texas LUIS V. GUTIERREZ, Illinois JASON CHAFFETZ, Utah KAREN BASS, California TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania CEDRIC RICHMOND, Louisiana TREY GOWDY, South Carolina SUZAN DelBENE, Washington RAU´ L LABRADOR, Idaho HAKEEM JEFFRIES, New York BLAKE FARENTHOLD, Texas DAVID N. CICILLINE, Rhode Island DOUG COLLINS, Georgia SCOTT PETERS, California RON DeSANTIS, Florida MIMI WALTERS, California KEN BUCK, Colorado JOHN RATCLIFFE, Texas DAVE TROTT, Michigan MIKE BISHOP, Michigan SHELLEY HUSBAND, Chief of Staff & General Counsel PERRY APELBAUM, Minority Staff Director & Chief Counsel (II) C O N T E N T S MAY 24, 2016 Page OPENING STATEMENTS The Honorable Bob Goodlatte, a Representative in Congress from the State of Virginia, and Chairman, Committee on the Judiciary ................................
    [Show full text]
  • The IRS Harassment Scandal
    The IRS Harassment Scandal: A Timeline of “Reform” Documenting Efforts by the Regulatory Community to Police Political Speech Timeline Events Current as of December 7, 2015 In May 2013, reports surfaced and investigations began into the revelation that the Internal Revenue Service had been scrutinizing groups applying for 501(c)(4) status using politically biased criteria. Beginning in March 2010, groups with names containing the words “Tea Party” or “patriot” were singled out for greater IRS scrutiny. Later, in an attempt to change from overtly partisan to more general criteria, the IRS shifted to targeting organizations with the goal of “teaching about the Constitution.” In addition to using these outrageous criteria, IRS officials were dishonest about their actions, repeatedly testifying before Congress that there was no targeting program. After admitting that the targeting had occurred, the IRS suggested that it was merely the result of a rogue group of agents in its Cincinnati office – a claim that has since been debunked by Congressional investigators. After submitting applications for nonprofit status, conservative-leaning social welfare groups waited years to hear back from the IRS. When they finally did hear back about the status of their application, the responses came in the form of demands for additional information. In many cases, the IRS required that groups send the agency their donor lists, names of board members, copies of minutes from all board meetings, resumes of individuals involved in the organization, and copies of all social media postings. Some organizations were asked to provide reports about the books their members had read as a group.
    [Show full text]
  • The IRS Harassment Scandal: a Timeline of “Reform” Documenting
    The IRS Harassment Scandal: A Timeline of “Reform” Documenting Efforts by the Regulatory Community to Police Political Speech Timeline Events Current as of April 7, 2014 In May 2013, reports surfaced and investigations began into the revelation that the Internal Revenue Service had been scrutinizing groups applying for 501(c)(4) status using politically biased criteria. Beginning in March 2010, groups with names containing the words “Tea Party” or “patriot” were singled out for greater IRS scrutiny. Later, in an attempt to change from overtly partisan to more general criteria, the IRS shifted to targeting organizations with the goal of “teaching about the Constitution.” In addition to using these outrageous criteria, IRS officials were dishonest about their actions, repeatedly testifying before Congress that there was no targeting program. After admitting that the targeting had occurred, the IRS suggested that it was merely the result of a rogue group of agents in its Cincinnati office – a claim that has since been debunked by Congressional investigators. After submitting applications for nonprofit status, conservative-leaning social welfare groups waited years to hear back from the IRS. When they finally did hear back about the status of their application, the responses came in the form of demands for additional information. In many cases, the IRS required that groups send the agency their donor lists, names of board members, copies of minutes from all board meetings, resumes of individuals involved in the organization, and copies of all social media postings. Some organizations were asked to provide reports about the books their members had read as a group.
    [Show full text]
  • IRS-Oursler-Trump-2016-2017.Pdf
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE WASHINGTON, DC 20224 PlttvACY, GovcJtNwaMTAL LlAJ.aH AND DteCLOSUtUI: January 10, 2017 ••• -- .- .r.• Dear Mr. Greenewald: Tnis is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, dated October 17, 201 6 tnat we received on October 17, 2016. You asKed for a copy of all emails sent to and from tne Congressional Relations/Legislative Relations liaison officer, Leonard Qw:s.J.ru:. whicn contain the word Trump for the period January 1, 2015 througn october 17, 2016. 1 am endosing a copy of tne requested records consisting of 39 pages. Tnis is a full grant of your request. Please note tnat the liaison officer, as part of nis daily briefings, receives emailed summaries of published news artides, pertaining to tax administration, compiled by the IRS and other sources. Many of these daily emails contain news artides tnat in dude the name "Trump·. We have not provided tnese emails as we assume your request was not meant to retrieve tnis type of email. Please let us Know if this is not the case. If you have any questions please call me at 651 -312-7813 or write to: Internal Revenue Service, Disclosure Scanning Operation, P.O.
    [Show full text]