Appendix A: Review of Set Theory
In this book, as in most modern mathematics, mathematical statements are couched in the language of set theory. We give here a brief descriptive summary of the parts of set theory that we use, in the form that is commonly called “naive set theory.” The word naive should be understood in the same sense in which it is used by Paul Halmos in his classic text Naive Set Theory [Hal74]: the assumptions of set theory are to be viewed much as Euclid viewed his geometric axioms, as intuitively clear statements of fact from which reliable conclusions can be drawn. Our description of set theory is based on the axioms of Zermelo–Fraenkel set theory together with the axiom of choice (commonly known as ZFC), augmented with a notion of classes (aggregations that are too large to be considered sets in ZFC), primarily for use in category theory. We do not give a formal axiomatic treat- ment of the theory; instead, we simply give the definitions and list the basic types of sets whose existence is guaranteed by the axioms. For more details on the subject, consult any good book on set theory, such as [Dev93,Hal74,Mon69,Sup72,Sto79]. We leave it to the set theorists to explore the deep consequences of the axioms and the relationships among different axiom systems.
Basic Concepts
A set is just a collection of objects, considered as a whole. The objects that make up the set are called its elements or its members. For our purposes, the elements of sets are always “mathematical objects”: integers, real numbers, complex numbers, and objects built up from them such as ordered pairs, ordered n-tuples, functions, sequences, other sets, and so on. The notation x 2 X means that the object x is an element of the set X. The words collection and family are synonyms for set. Technically speaking, set and element of a set are primitive undefined terms in set theory. Instead of giving a general definition of what it means to be a set, or for an object to be an element of a set, mathematicians characterize each particular set by giving a precise definition of what it means for an object to be an element of that
J.M. Lee, Introduction to Topological Manifolds, Graduate Texts in Mathematics 202, 381 DOI 10.1007/978-1-4419-7940-7, © Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011 382 A: Review of Set Theory set—what might be called the set’s membership criterion. For example, if Q is the set of all rational numbers, then the membership criterion for Q could be expressed as follows:
x 2 Q , x D p=q for some integers p and q with q ¤ 0:
The essential characteristic of sets is that they are determined by their elements. Thus if X and Y are sets, to say that X and Y are equal is to say that every element of X is an element of Y , and every element of Y is an element of X. Symbolically,
X D Y if and only if for all x, x 2 X , x 2 Y:
If X and Y are sets such that every element of X is also an element of Y , then X is a subset of Y , written X Y . Thus
X Y if and only if for all x, x 2 X ) x 2 Y:
The notation Y X (“Y is a superset of X”) means the same as X Y . It follows from the definitions that X D Y if and only if X Y and X Y . If X Y but X ¤ Y , we say that X is a proper subset of Y (or Y is a proper superset of X). Some authors use the notations X Y and Y X to mean that X is a proper subset of Y ; however, since other authors use the symbol “ ” to mean any subset, not necessarily proper, we generally avoid using this notation, and instead say explicitly when a subset is proper. Here are the basic types of sets whose existence is guaranteed by ZFC. In each case, the set is completely determined by its membership criterion.