arXiv:1803.05108v2 [cond-mat.quant-gas] 10 Dec 2018 platform[ osuyteln ag ioedpl neato n ul- and interaction dipole-dipole chemistry.[ range tracold long the study to ru olt eraetetmeaueo three-level a temperature of Doppler temperature the the below efficient system decrease pow- for atomic to a trap is tool cooling magnetic erful laser or Sub-Doppler trap cooling. evaporative optical then and to (MOT), trap transfers magnetic-optical a with starts ally fmn oysae n hi yaisuigquantum using dynamics lattices,[ their optical in and gases states manipulation body coherent many of as such phenomenon, interesting hc h ursec aeo h rpe tm is atoms trapped cesium[ the on experimen- of demonstrated tally was then rate and reduced, fluorescence strongly the which velocity trapping.[ and takes population cooling which spe- coherent gradient selective a cooling, evap- polarization laser is after of sub-Doppler cooling advantage number for (GM) atom molasses method clearly final Gray cial and the trap in cooling. the gain orative to a efficiency to transfer leading resulting higher cloud, atomic the of in density space phase the creases degeneracy quantum lattice.[ to optical and rubidium two-dimensional lattice, in of optical cooling in laser atoms direct Fermi for as imaging such cooling[ resolved (EIT) temperature, transparency induced lower cooling[ ically sideband and Raman number with 3D atom sample atomic large an a produce to continuously veloped matter,[ logical h otmn osat n stentrlln width line natural transition.[ the atomic is Γ of and constant, Boltzmann the where rniin oercnl,G oln a elzdon realized was cooling GM recently, More transition. ∗ † orsodn uhremail: author Corresponding orsodn uhremail: author Corresponding [email protected] hninShi, Zhenlian lrcl tmcgssoe eakbyrich remarkably a offer gases atomic Ultracold oln eta tm outaodtmeaueusu- temperature ultracold to atoms neutral Cooling n19s Mcoigwspooe nRef.[ in proposed was cooling GM 1990s, In ~ 1 and oehneorudrtnigo numerous of understanding our enhance to ] ASnmes 71.e 71.h 67.85.-d 37.10.Gh, 37.10.De, numbers: PACS 56 xie tt 3 state excited ffr rmsn ot o h atcoigo h oimato sodium the of cooling fast the clo for atomic route of promising density a space offers phase high and temperature lower sn hscoigtcnqe h tmcsml in sample atomic the technique, cooling this Using t591n.Tak otehprn pi bu Γbtenthe between 6Γ about split hyperfine the to Thanks nm. 589.1 at u-ope ae oln of cooling laser Sub-Doppler k erpr nteecetga oasscoigo oimatom sodium of cooling molasses gray efficient the on report We 6 ,2 1, µ B 26 – n35m.W bev httelaigecec nomagneti into efficiency loading the that observe We ms. 3.5 in K 11 r h eue ln osatand constant Plank reduced the are 12 – iin Li, Ziliang n lrcl soito molecules association ultracold and ] 28 nttt fOt-lcrnc,Sax nvriy Taiyua University, Shanxi Opto-electronics, of Institute – 21 14 n rubidium[ and ] 1 – e oln ehiusaede- are techniques cooling New ] 2 tt e aoaoyo unu pisadQatmOtc De Optics Quantum and Optics Quantum of Laboratory Key State 23 – [email protected]; pengjun 2 5 P hstcnqegetyin- greatly technique This ] pnobtculn otopo- to coupling orbit spin ] 3 ,2 1, 15 / 2 hsaoi rniini ffciefrtega oassco molasses gray the for effective is transition atomic this , – egu Wang, Pengjun 17 2 [email protected] hniUiest,Tiun hni000,China 030006, Shanxi Taiyuan, University, Shanxi olbrtv noainCne fEteeOptics, Extreme of Center Innovation Collaborative 20 n electromagnet- and ] ] 29 24 ihnthe within ] ] 18 , 19 ~ nsite- in ] ,2, 1, Γ 25 / 2 ,in ], ∗ k D 23 egigMeng, Zengming B 2 , ai rymlse nthe on molasses gray in Na F bet atr odaddneaoi lu f3 of cloud atomic are dense we and cooling, cold molasses capture bright to the rate able fluorescence to reduced compared much GM the in to Thanks Fig.1(a). oimaoscoe nsxbasG ntebu side blue the on GM beams the six of in cooled atoms sodium which space collisions. dark light-assisted in by induced trapped and heating are prevent cooling, energy gradient lower polarization with the could ones in then down and the cooled coupling to induced be coupled motion be by could states Atoms states bright dark molasses. in detuned energy red gradi- higher standard with polarization a a like giving cooling ent modulated, spatially is ergy the of detuning blue atom metastable atoms alkali including species, atomic many 7 ihrddtndlaser,[ red-detuned with iy nteG oln ehns,dr n bright and dark manifold.[ hyperfine sublevels mechanism, ground Zeeman the of cooling in superposition coherent GM the are the den- states phase-space In in higher advantages and substantial sity. temperature to lower leads of cooling terms GM the that nrysetu.Tecoigtcnqewsas im- also was technique the cooling on The plemented spectrum. energy tm in atoms ua oetmand momentum where trap, gular quadrupole plugged cally tm ttmeaueo 56 of temperature at atoms ledtndlaser.[ blue-detuned ssee oaRmnfie mlfir(F) ob ampli- be to (RFA), (ECDL) amplifier laser fiber Raman diode a cavity to external seeded from is 1178 mW (at power 23 beam of oscillator laser the nm) master First, a system. (MOPA) doubling amplifier frequency by duced phase. GM in the a detuning of after function Raman a two-photon number as and cooling evaporative temperature RF-induced short atom’s significant a the show of also We evidence technique. GM the atomic the to of using density due cloud space 70% phase to high and increased temperature is lower efficiency loading the that Li,[ rudmnfl scoe rm700 from cooled is manifold ground 2 = nti etr erpr na xeietlsuyof study experimental an on report we Letter, this In nteeprmn,telsrlgt(t59n)i pro- is nm) 589 (at light laser the experiment, the In 32 ] D datrga oass hstechnique This molasses. gray after ud 39 2 si the in ms | ,2 1, K,[ F transition ,Sax 306 China 030006, Shanxi n, 33 2 = inhiHuang, Lianghui sn the using s , | F rpi nrae u othe to due increased is trap c 34 m , ′ 4 F D He,[ 40 2 = ] F 2 state. 2 = | 6 thsbe rvnexperimentally proven been has It ] F D Li,[ m rniint cool to transition 2 = i 38 g 39 1 D F and 2 = hc a prtn nthe on operating was which ] 31 rniinwt oeresolved more with transition 2 n cool and ] sispoeto.W observe We projection. its is i ln mechanism. oling vices, pia transition optical , r rnfre oa opti- an to transferred are | | → i 35 F µ ,2 1, .AtrteG phase, GM the After K. ′ ] 3 = D 31 23 n igZhang Jing and F 2 Na,[ h rgtsaeen- state bright The ] e i 87 line 2 = nthe in µ F bt 4 to Rb to K 36 stettlan- total the is i 40 ] ssonin shown as , 41 o50 to K 40 K,[ K,[ µ 37 with K ,2, 1, 30 × and ] , 10 µ † 31 K 8 ] 2

(a) (b) DL Pro (a) Δ = 2.48Γ (c) F' =3 1178 nm λ/4 1000 AOM Lock on the 1000 58.3 MHz RFA +199 2 F=2 → F'=3 line 3 P3/2 δ SHG Δ Na vapor F' =2 589 nm 34.3 MHz 100 F' =1 100 Temperature (µk) Temperature λ/4 λ/4 (µk) Temperature 15.8 MHz AOM AOM F' =0 +382 +375 589.158 nm 0 3 6 9 12 AOM Molassess time tm (ms) λ/4 +344 cooler repumper 3.0 (b) AOM

+82 ) 90 (d) 3D MOT 8 2.5 1771.6 MHz λ/4 AOM 2.0 80 F=2 +92.4 2D MOT 2 3 S1/2 1.5 70

polarization acousto-optic AOM detector mirror wave plate 1.0 F=1 beam splitter modulators 60 Number (×Number 10

0.5 Temperature (µk) 50 Fig. 1. (a) Sodium cooling scheme on the D2 line. The cooling -3 -2 -1 0 1 0 1 2 3 4 beam (blue) is blue detuned by ∆ from |Fg = 2i → |Fe = 2i Raman detuning δ (Γ) Icool /Irepump transition, the repumping beam (red) is blue detuned by ∆ + δ from |Fg = 1i → |Fe = 2i transition, where the Fg (Fe) is the ground-excite state level. Here, δ denotes the two-photon Fig. 2. (a) The temperature (red squares) and (b) number Raman detuning. (b) Sketch of the optical setup for cooling (blue circles) of atomic sample after GM with time t = 3.5 sodium, and the dashed box represents the setup for saturated ms as a function of two photon Raman detuning in the case absorption spectroscopy. of ∆ = 2.48Γ. The temperature after GM at the fix principal detuning ∆ = 2.48Γ and Raman detuning δ = 0, as a func- tion of (c) the pulse duration time t and (d) the intensity ratio Icool/Irepump of the Raman cooling pulse at a constant inten- fied to 7 W and transferred to the SHG unit for second 2 sity Irepump = 5Isat, where Isat = 6.26 mw/cm . The data harmonic generation (SHG) modules. We obtain 3.3 W points show the average of three experimental measurements, of output power at 589 nm, which is sufficient for cooling with error bars corresponding to the standard deviation of and trapping of 23Na in experiment. This single laser the mean. source supplies the coherence between the two frequen- cies for generating the long-lived dressed dark states in GM cooling. The frequency of output beam is stabilized of the cooling frequency from the |Fg = 2i → |Fe = 2i at |Fg = 2i → |Fe = 3i by the saturated absorption transition as the principal (one-photon) laser detuning ∆ spectroscopy. The cooling and repumping laser beams in the range of 1Γ−5Γ(Γ=2π ×9.79 MHz is the natural are obtained using acousto-optic modulators (AOMs) in linewidth of the D2 line), and the frequency difference double pass configuration.[41] Here, the AOMs are acting between the cooler fC and the repumper fR as the two- as fast switches and frequency and intensity tuners. After photon Raman detuning δ = fR − fC − 1771.6 MHz. that the laser beams of the cooling and repumping laser During the molasses time t, the cooling and repumping are combined by a polarization beam splitter (PBS) and beams are detuned to desired values and the intensity of delivered to the science cell by polarization maintaining two laser beams is reduced. At the end of GM phase, an optical fibers; as shown in Fig.1(b). They are then ex- absorption image is applied to measure the temperature panded to 25 mm for MOT beams and distributed to the and number of atomic cloud after a few ms of time of three pairs of σ+ - σ− counter-propagating configuration. flight (TOF). Sodium atoms are loaded from a two dimensional We first study the effect of GM cooling for different magnetic-optical trap and trapped by a dual-operation experimental parameters with the fixed principal detun- three dimensional magnetic-optical trap (3DMOT) op- ing ∆ = 2.48Γ (red detuned 34 MHz on the transition erating on the D2 transition introduced in,[42, 43] in of |Fg = 2i → |Fe = 3i, which means that it is the blue which two laser frequencies are used, one is tuned to detuning 24.3 MHz for |Fg = 2i → |Fe = 2i), such as |Fg = 2i → |Fe = 3i transition with a red detun- two-photon Raman detuning, duration time of GM and ing 34 MHz for cooling and the other one is tuned to the intensity ratio, as shown in Fig.2. |Fg = 1i → |Fe = 2i transition with a red detuning 57 The atomic sample temperature and number after the MHz for repumping. In the 3DMOT, the almost same GM are observed as a function of two-photon detuning number of atoms in the F = 1 and F = 2 states and to- δ and a Fano-like profile at the atom temperature due tal number is about 7.3×109. The temperature is about to the interference of different excitation processes, ac- 700 µK. At the end of 3DMOT loading, the compressed companied by a sharp change in the number of cooled magnetic optical trap (CMOT) is used to increase the atoms, as shown in Figs. 2(a) and 2(b). Firstly, we focus density, in which the magnetic field gradient is ramped on the case of the zero Raman detuning δ = 0, where from 4 G/cm to 10 G/cm in 50 ms. we find that the temperature minimum of T = 56 µK To decrease the temperature, the GM phase is applied is reached. The maximum number about 3.1 × 108 of for a duration time 3.5 ms after the magnetic field is the atomic cloud is obtained by the GM with a phase switched off in ≃ 100 µs. Here, we define the detuning space density (PSD) of 1.3 × 10−6, which means that 3

1000 300 (a) (b) Δ = 3.5Γ ms is attributed to the small misplacement between the 250 center of magnetic trap and the position of atoms cloud, 200 which is designed for better loading in the MOT phase to

150 avoid atoms loss. Figure 2(d) shows the temperature as 100 100 a function of the ratio between cooler and repumper in- Temperature (µk) Temperature 50 tensities Icool/Irepump. We find a nearly linearly decrease 1 2 3 4 -0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 at the initial regimes and a minimal temperature of ∼ 56 Principlal detuning Δ (Γ) Raman detuning δ (Γ) µK reached at the ratio of 2, and a slightly increase with

(c) (d) more cooling power. This may be understood from the Δ = 2.68Γ Δ = 1.46Γ induced light shift in the dressed state picture.[32] At the 1000 1000 case of fixed frequency, the atoms remained in dark states

distribute the spatial variation of the standing wave and 100 loss how much energy depending on the difference of light 100 shift between the entry and departure points, as in the Temperature (µk) Temperature behavior of bright molasses. -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 -3 -2 -1 0 1 Raman detuning δ (Γ) Raman detuning δ (Γ) We also measure the atom temperature after the GM with different one-photon detunings for 1Γ <∆< 5Γ on the blue side of the transition of |Fg =2i → |Fe =2i, as Fig. 3. (a) The minimum temperature obtained after GM as a shown in Fig.3. This shows that the minimal tempera- function of the principal detuning ∆; The atom temperature 23 ture could reach ∼ 55 µK for ∆ = 2.48Γ, and increases of Na after t = 3.5 ms of GM cooling as a function of two photon Raman detuning in the case of (b) ∆ = 3.5Γ, (c) ∆ on both sides. This behavior can be attributed to the = 2.68Γ and (d) ∆ = 1.46Γ. chosen structure in GM: the energy separation between the |Fe =2i and |Fe =3i in excite states is about 5.9Γ, thus for higher ∆, the upper state may start to play a in the case the atoms in dark spaces are maximally cou- role. As mentioned in Ref.[40], the closed transition of pled to bright states at the bottom of energy hills and |Fg =2i → |Fe =3i contributes to the inefficiency of the this induces a peak in the atom number in Fig.2(b). The GM cooling. This phenomenon is different from that of motion coupling between dark states and bright states GM on the D1 optical transition, in which the reached is velocity selective, thus the atoms with higher veloc- temperature is weakly dependent on the one-photon laser ity could be coupled to bright states and re-cooled by detuning. the Sisyphus cooling, and the coldest atoms will accu- The measured temperature after GM with different mulate in the dark spaces with less interaction with the one-photon detunings as a function of the two photon light field. The GM cooling mechanism is working in this Raman detunings δ are shown in Figs. 3(b)–3 (d). For case and could cool the atoms to lower temperature than each value of ∆, the minimum temperature is obtained on the bright molasses on the D2 line. For slightly red de- δ ≈ 0, similar to the report in earlier experiments. In the tuned at δ = −0.5Γ, a heating peak is observed, which case of ∆ = 1.46Γ, there is a very wide heating window means that in the case the atoms in dark states have and the temperature is very higher at the red detuning, more energy than those in bright states and will gain ki- where the repumper is close resonance with the atomic netic energy when they couple to bright states at the top transition of |Fg =1i → |Fe =2i, as shown in Fig.3(d). of energy hills. This mechanism leads a strong heating, During optimizing the GM, we find that the stray mag- and the temperature increases from 700 µK (the MOT netic field and misalignment of the laser beams affects the temperature) to about 2 mK, accompanied by a signif- attained minimal temperature of the GM phase. Here, icant loss of atom number during the molasses phase, the three pairs of coils are used to produce XYZ bias which is the inverse of the Sisyphus cooling. In addition fields for compensating the stray field. to the sharp dip and peak in atom temperature and num- The most evident advantage of the GM is to obtain a ber close the resonance δ = 0, we notice that the more large number of atoms with lower temperature for loading atoms with lower temperature are captured in the case to magnetic trap. After the GM phase, optical pumping of δ > 0 compared with that at the red detuning δ < 0. is applied in 0.8 ms, during which the atoms are pumped This phenomenon is corrected that the main component to the stretched low field seeking Zeeman state |F = of the dark state is lower than that of the bright state in 2,mF =2i, and then are loaded to the optically plugged the detuning δ > 0, and more atoms could be trapped in magnetic trap. In the loading magnetic trap process, dark states with lower temperature. a magnetic trap with lower gradient about 10 G/cm is The temperature after the GM is plotted as a function fist used and then the trap gradient is increased to 200 of the duration time tm in Fig.2(c). The temperature de- G/cm in 200 ms. The special designed ramp stage can creases immediately at about 3 ms and reaches the mini- prevent the atoms in other low field seeking hyperfine mum value at about 3.5 ms where a steady state is built, states from loading to the magnetic trap. Lastly, atoms and then increases slowly with a longer duration time. loaded in magnetic trap can be probed after a few ms of The observation of no noticeable cooling effect at first 3 time-of-flight (TOF). The atom number in the magnetic 4

2.5 orative cooling is performed to cool the atomic sample ) (a) 8 2.0 down to lower temperature for 5 s. We also study the ef- fect of gray molasses on this stage. The atom number and

1.5 temperature after evaporative cooling versus the two- 1.0 photon Raman detuning in gray molasses are shown in Number (×10 Number 0.5 Figs. 4(b) and 4(c). After optimizing the parameters on the gray molasses, an atomic sample containing 5.1 × 107 atoms with T = 150 µK is produced. 5 (b) )

7 In conclusion, we have shown an effective GM cooling 4 of sodium on the D2 transition, thanks to the sufficiently 3 large hyperfine split about 6Γ between the |Fe =2i and 2 2 |Fe = 3i in the excited state 3 P3/2, and the phase co- 1 herence between the cooling and repumping beams from 0 a single laser source. We have investigated the proper- 270 (c) ties of GM cooling by studying the dependence of the sample temperature on the one-photon detuning, two- 240 photon Raman detuning, molasses duration time and the

210 intensity ratio. The high phase space density after GM 180 provides a starting condition for the effective loading of magnetic traps, which is the best evidence of the cooling

Temperature (μk) Temperature 150 (×10 Number mechanism. The experimental results give us a picture of -1.5 -1.2 -0.9 -0.6 -0.3 0.0 0.3 0.6 0.9 GM for D2 line which could work in the atomic species Raman detuning δ (Γ) with the hyperfine split about ∼ 6Γ in excited states. Our experiment shows that GM cooling on the D2 line Fig. 4. (a) The atom number loaded into the magnetic trap as is a viable route to high phase space density, while it is a function of the two-photon Raman detuning. The number lower than in GM cooling on D1 line. The requirement (b) and temperature (c) of atoms after a short RF forced of only a single laser for all cooling process is a clear evaporative cooling as a function of the two-photon Raman detuning in GM phase at ∆ = 2.48Γ. advantage.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS trap as a function of the two-photon Raman detuning in GM is shown in Fig.4(a). Here the one-photon detuning This research was supported by National Key Re- is ∆ = 2.48Γ. We also observe a Fano-like profile, from search and Development Program of China (Grant No. which the loading efficiency is increased to 70% by the 2016YFA0301602), NSFC (Grants No. 11474188, and GM cooling mechanism. No. 11704234), the Fund for Shanxi “1331 Project” Key Subjects Construction, and the program of Youth Sanjin After loading to the magnetic trap, an RF forced evap- Scholar.

[1] Bloch I, Dalibard J and Zwerger W 2008 Rev. Mod. Phys. [12] Carr L D, DeMille D, Krems R V and Ye J 2009 New J. 80 885 Phys. 11 055049 [2] Windpassinger P and Sengstock K 2013 Rep. Prog. Phys. [13] Xu R D, Liu W L, Wu J Z, Ma J, Xiao L T and Jia S T 76 086401 2016 Acta Phys. Sin. 65 093201 (in Chinese) [3] Eckardt A 2017 Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 011004 [14] Moses S A, Covey J P, Miecnikowski M T, Jin D S and [4] Gross C and Bloch I 2017 Science 357 995 Ye J 2017 Nat. Phys. 13 13 [5] Qi W, Li Z H and Liang Z X 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 [15] Cheuk L W, Nichols M A, Okan M, Gersdorf T, Ra- 010301 masesh V V, Bakr W S, Lompe T and Zwierlein M W [6] Galitski V and Spielman I B 2013 Nature 494 49 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 193001 [7] Goldman N, Juzeli¯unas G, O¨hberg P and Spielman I B [16] Parsons M F, Huber F, Mazurenko A, Chiu C S, Setiawan 2014 Rep. Prog. Phys. 77 126401 W, Wooley-Brown K, Blatt S and Greiner M 2015 Phys. [8] Zhai H 2015 Rep. Prog. Phys. 78 026001 Rev. Lett. 114 213002 [9] Liu X J, Hu H and Pu H 2015 Chin. Phys. B 24 050502 [17] Omran A, Boll M, Hilker T A, Kleinlein K, Salomon G, [10] Zhang J, Hu H, Liu X and Pu H 2014 Annu. Rev. Cold Bloch I and Gross C 2015 Phys. Rev. Lett. 115 263001 At. Mol. 2 81 [18] Haller E, Hudson J, Kelly A, Cotta D A, Peaudecerf B, [11] Chai X D, Yu Z F, Zhang A X and Xue J K 2017 Chin. Bruce G D and Kuhr S 2015 Nat. Phys. 11 738 Phys. Lett. 34 090301 [19] Edge G J A, Anderson R, Jervis D, Mckay D C, Day R, Trotzky S and Thywissen J H 2015 Phys. Rev. A 92 5

063406 Khaykovich L, Chevy F and Salomon C 2013 Phys. Rev. [20] Hu J, Urvoy A, Vendeiro Z, Cr´epel V, Chen W and A 87 063411 Vuleti´c V 2017 Science 358 1078 [33] Salomon G, Fouch´e L, Wang P, Aspect A, Bouyer P and [21] Dalibard J and Cohen-Tannoudji C 1989 J. Opt. Soc. Bourdel T 2013 Europhys. Lett. 104 63002 Am. B 6 2023 [34] Nath D, Easwaran R K, Rajalakshmi G and Unnikrish- [22] Lett P D, Phillips W D, Rolston S L, Tanner C E, Watts nan C S 2013 Phys. Rev. A 88 053407 R N and Westbrook C I 1989 J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6 2084 [35] Burchianti A, Valtolina G, Seman J A, Pace E, De Pas [23] Weiss D S, Riis E, Shevy Y, Ungar P J and Chu S 1989 M, Inguscio M, Zaccanti M and Roati G 2014 Phys. Rev. J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 6 2072 A 90 043408 [24] Aspect A, Arimondo E, Kaiser R, Vansteenkiste N and [36] Colzi G, Durastante G, Fava E, Serafini S, Lamporesi G Cohen-Tannoudji C 1988 Phys. Rev. Lett. 61 826 and Ferrari G 2016 Phys. Rev. A 93 023421 [25] Grynberg G and Courtois J -Y 1994 Europhys. Lett. 27 [37] Chen H, Yao X, Wu Y, Liu X, Wang X, Wang Y, Chen 41 Y and Pan J 2016 Phys. Rev. A 94 033408 [26] Boiron D, Trich´e C, Meacher D R, Verkerk P and Gryn- [38] Bouton Q, Chang R, Hoendervanger A L, Nogrette F, berg G. 1995 Phys. Rev. A 52 R3425(R) Aspect A, Westbrook C I and Cl´ement D 2015 Phys. [27] Boiron D, Michaud A, Lemonde P, Castin Y, Salomon C, Rev. A 91 061402 Weyers S, Szymaniec K, Cognet L and Clairon A 1996 [39] Bruce G D , Haller E, Peaudecerf B, Cotta D A, Andia Phys. Rev. A 53 R3734(R) M, Wu S, Johnson M Y H, Lovett B W and Kuhr S 2017 [28] Trich´e C, Verkerk P and Grynberg G 1999 Eur. Phys. J. J. Phys. B 50 095002 D 5 225 [40] Rosi S, Burchianti A, Conclave S, Naik D S, Roati G, [29] Esslinger T, Sander F, Hemmerich A, and H¨ansch T W, Fort C and Minardi F 2018 Sci. Rep. 8 1301 Ritsch H and Weidem¨uller M 1996 Opt. Lett. 21 991 [41] Donley E A, Heavner T P, Levi F, Tataw M O and Jef- [30] Fernandes D R, Sievers F, Kretzschmar N, Wu S, Sa- ferts S R 2005 Rev. Sci. Instrum. 76 063112 lomon C and Chevy F 2012 Europhys. Lett. 100 63001 [42] Imai H, Akatsuka T, Ode T and Morinaga A 2012 Phys. [31] Sievers F, Kretzschmar N, Fernandes D R, Suchet D, Rev. A 85 013633 Rabinovic M, Wu S, Parker C V, Khaykovich L, Salomon [43] Tanaka H, Imai H, Furuta K, Kato Y, Tashiro S, Abe M, C and Chevy F 2015 Phys. Rev. A 91 023426 Tajima R and Morinaga A 2007 Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46 [32] Grier A T, Ferrier-Barbut I, Rem B S, Delehaye M, L492