DOCSLIB.ORG

Securities and Exchange Commission Washington, Dc 20549

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Table of Contents SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, DC 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of Report: May 21, 2002 Autobytel Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 0-22239 (Commission File Number) Delaware 33-0711569 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 18872 MacArthur Boulevard Irvine, California 92612 (Address of principal executive offices, with zip code) (949) 225-4500 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Item 4. Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits. SIGNATURES INDEX TO EXHIBITS EXHIBIT 16 EXHIBIT 99.1 Table of Contents Item 4. Changes in Registrant’s Certifying Accountant Arthur Andersen LLP (“Andersen”) has served as Autobytel Inc.’s (the “Company”) auditors since 1995 and has advised the Company on federal, state and local tax matters. After an evaluation of services provided by a number of independent accounting firms as well as their knowledge of the industry, the Company’s Board of Directors has decided to engage PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its independent accountants for the current fiscal year ending December 31, 2002. (a) Previous independent accountants (i) On May 21, 2002, the Company dismissed Andersen as its independent accountants. (ii) The reports of Andersen on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for each of the past two fiscal years contained no adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion and were not qualified or modified as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principle. (iii) The decision to change independent accountants was recommended by the Audit Committee and approved by the Board of Directors. (iv) During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, the Company has had no disagreements with Andersen on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements if not resolved to the satisfaction of Andersen would have caused it to make reference thereto in its report on the consolidated financial statements of the Company for such years. (v) During the Company’s two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, the Company has had no reportable events (as defined in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K). (vi) Andersen furnished the Company with a letter addressed to the Securities and Exchange Commission stating that it agrees with the above statements. A copy of such letter, dated May 22, 2002, is filed as Exhibit 16 to this Form 8-K. (b) New independent accountants The Company engaged PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as its new independent accountants as of May 21, 2002. During the two most recent fiscal years and through the date of this report, the Company has not consulted with PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP on items which (1) were or should have been subject to SAS 50 or (2) concerned the subject matter of a disagreement or reportable event with the former auditor (as described in Item 304(a)(2) of Regulation S-K). 2 Table of Contents Item 7. Financial Statements, Pro Forma Financial Information and Exhibits. (c) Exhibits 16. Letter of Arthur Andersen LLP, dated May 22, 2002 99.1 Press Release dated May 22, 2002. SIGNATURES Autobytel Inc. Date: May 22, 2002 By: /s/ Hoshi Printer Hoshi Printer Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) 3 Table of Contents INDEX TO EXHIBITS Exhibit Number Description 16 Letter of Arthur Andersen LLP, dated May 22, 2002 99.1 Press Release dated May 22, 2002 4 ANDERSEN Arthur Andersen LLP Suite 800 18201 Van Karman Avenue Irvine, CA 92612 Tel 949 757 3100 Fax 949 757 3163 www.andersen.com Office of the Chief Accountant Securities and Exchange Commission 450 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20549 May 22, 2002 Dear Sirs/Madam: We have read the paragraphs of Item 4 included in the Form 8-K dated May 21, 2002 of Autobytel Inc. to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are in agreement with the statements contained therein. With respect to paragraph (b) of Item 4, we have no direct knowledge of the Company’s process to replace us with new accountants and cannot comment on that information. Very truly yours, /s/ Arthur Andersen LLP ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP cc: Mr. Hoshi Printer, CFO, Autobytel Inc. At Autobytel Inc.: Geri Weinfeld, Director, Investor Relations [email protected] 949/225-4553 Melanie Webber, Vice President, Corporate Communications [email protected] 949/862-3023 Autobytel Appoints PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as Independent Accountants IRVINE, May 22, 2002 — Autobytel Inc. (Nasdaq: ABTL) today announced that it has appointed PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Company’s independent accountants for the year ended December 31, 2002. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP replaces Arthur Andersen LLP. The decision to replace Andersen comes after a thorough selection process conducted by the Company’s Audit Committee and management. “Our decision to select PricewaterhouseCoopers to perform auditing and tax services for our Company was influenced by the depth of their experience and the quality of their professionals,” said Jeffrey Schwartz, Autobytel’s president and chief executive officer. “We would like to thank Andersen for its years of service on behalf of Autobytel. We have the utmost respect for those individuals we have worked with at Andersen.” About Autobytel Inc. Autobytel Inc. (Nasdaq: ABTL), a leading Internet automotive marketing services company, helps retailers sell cars and manufacturers build brands through marketing and CRM (customer relationship management) programs. Autobytel Inc. owns and operates the popular websites Autobytel.com, Autoweb.com, Carsmart.com and Autosite.com, as well as AIC (Automotive Information Center), a leading provider of automotive marketing data and technology. Autobytel Inc. generated an estimated four percent of all domestic new vehicle sales — $17 billion in car sales in 2001 — for dealers through its websites. With approximately 8,900 dealer relationships and 30 international automotive manufacturer customers, Autobytel Inc. is the largest syndicated car-buying content network, reaching millions of unique visitors as they are making their vehicle buying decisions. Autobytel Inc. content and technology has potential exposure to over 90 percent of total web traffic.1 1 Jupiter Media Metrix October 2001 Digital Media Audience Report (Autobytel Inc. sites is the unduplicated audience of the Autobytel and Autoweb properties and Carsmart.com. The car-buying and ownership category as defined by Autobytel. Autobytel Inc. provides content to Yahoo! Inc., AOL websites, MSN.com and Lycos.com. The unduplicated audience of these four sites accounts for over 90 percent of total traffic.) .
Recommended publications
  • Managing Tomorrow's People*

    Managing Tomorrow's People*

    Managing tomorrow’s people* The future of work to 2020 *connectedthinking Contents Introduction 02 Small is beautiful: welcome to the Orange World 18 2020: where three worlds co-exist 04 The journey to Orange 18 Life in the Orange World: the main themes 19 Corporate is king: welcome to the Blue World 06 Work in the Orange World: the people challenges 21 The journey to Blue 06 The Orange HR business model 22 Life in the Blue World: the main themes 07 Work in the Blue World: the people challenges 09 Are you ready for tomorrow’s world? 25 The Blue HR business model 10 Appendix 27 Companies care: Definitions: Scenarios, Millenials 27 welcome to the Green World 12 Our methodology 28 The journey to Green 12 Global forces 29 Life in the Green World: the main themes 13 PwC Graduate Survey findings 30 Work in the Green World: the people challenges 15 Contacts 32 The Green HR business model 16 Foreword 01 The journey to 2020 about the future of people management. Our team has At the beginning of 2007, a team from identified three possible ‘worlds’ PricewaterhouseCoopers gathered to explore the – plausible futures to provide a future of people management. Our thinking was context in which to examine the sparked by the rising profile of people issues on way organisations might operate the business agenda – the talent crisis, an ageing in the future. In addition we surveyed almost 3,000 workforce in the western world, the increase in MillennialsA1 – new graduates from the US, China global worker mobility and the organisational and and the UK who represent a generation just joining Foreword cultural issues emerging from the dramatic pace of the workforce, to test their views and expectations business change in the past decade.
  • The Greatest Business Decisions of All Time: How Apple, Ford, IBM, Zappos, and Others Made Radical Choices That Changed the Cour

    The Greatest Business Decisions of All Time: How Apple, Ford, IBM, Zappos, and Others Made Radical Choices That Changed the Cour

    The Greatest BUSINESS DECISIONS of All Time HOW APPLE, FORD, IBM, ZAPPOS, AND OTHERS MADE RADICAL CHOICES THAT CHANGED THE COURSE OF BUSINESS. By Verne Harnish and the Editors of Fortune Foreword by Jim Collins . ACKNOWLEDGMENTS When you delve into the great decisions chronicled in these pages, you’ll find that in most instances it was the people involved that really mattered. The same holds true for producing this book. First, we want to thank Fortune managing editor Andy Serwer, who, displaying the vision and entrepreneurial spirit we’ve long admired him for, green-lighted this project in the same meeting in which we pitched it and then provided support all along the way. Fortune art director Emily Kehe, working with Time Inc.’s talented Anne-Michelle Gallero, applied their usual elegant sense of style to the design. Carol Gwinn, our copyeditor par excellence, used her superb language skills to save ourselves from ourselves. Steve Koepp and Joy Butts at Time Home Entertainment Inc., the book’s publisher, worked creatively behind the scenes to make this project a reality, and for that we’re truly grateful. And we extend our thanks and admiration to Jim Collins for providing such an insightful foreword to the book. Last, a big bow to the writers and editors on Fortune’s staff who used their in-depth knowledge of business and their nonpareil writing skills to make this book what I hope you’ll find to be a wonderful, informative read. TO DECISION-MAKERS WHO KEEP MAKING THE TOUGH CALLS . TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword BY JIM COLLINS Introduction By VERNE HARNISH Chapter 1 Apple Brings Back Steve Jobs By ADAM LASHINSKY Chapter 2 How Free Shipping Saved Zappos By JENNIFER REINGOLD Chapter 3 Why Samsung Lets Its Stars Goof Off BY NICHOLAS VARCHAVER Chapter 4 At Johnson & Johnson, the Shareholder Comes Last BY TIMOTHY K.
  • 2019 Inspection Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York)

    2019 Inspection Pricewaterhousecoopers LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York)

    2019 Inspection PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (Headquartered in New York, New York) December 17, 2020 THIS IS A PUBLIC VERSION OF A PCAOB INSPECTION REPORT PORTIONS OF THE COMPLETE REPORT ARE OMITTED FROM THIS DOCUMENT IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 104(g)(2) AND 105(b)(5)(A) OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002 PCAOB RELEASE NO. 104-2021-005 Executive Summary Our 2019 inspection report on PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP provides information on our inspection to assess the firm’s compliance with Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards and rules and other applicable regulatory and professional requirements. This executive summary offers a high-level overview of: (1) Part I.A of the report, which discusses deficiencies (“Part I.A deficiencies”) in certain issuer audits that were of such significance that we believe the firm, at the time it issued its audit report(s), had not obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence to support its opinion on the issuer's financial statements and/or internal control over financial reporting (“ICFR”), and (2) Part I.B of the report, which discusses deficiencies that do not relate directly to the sufficiency or appropriateness of evidence the firm obtained to support its opinion(s) but nevertheless relate to instances of non-compliance with PCAOB standards or rules. The fact that we have included a deficiency in this report — other than those deficiencies for audits with incorrect opinions on the financial statements and/or ICFR — does not necessarily mean that the issuer’s financial statements are materially misstated or that undisclosed material weaknesses in ICFR exist.
  • GAO-08-163 Audits of Public Companies

    GAO-08-163 Audits of Public Companies

    United States Government Accountability Office Report to Congressional Addressees GAO January 2008 AUDITS OF PUBLIC COMPANIES Continued Concentration in Audit Market for Large Public Companies Does Not Call for Immediate Action GAO-08-163 January 2008 AUDITS OF PUBLIC COMPANIES Accountability Integrity Reliability Continued Concentration in Audit Market for Large Highlights Public Companies Does Not Call for Immediate Action Highlights of GAO-08-163, a report to congressional addressees Why GAO Did This Study What GAO Found GAO has prepared this report While the small public company audit market is much less concentrated, the under the Comptroller General’s four largest accounting firms continue to audit almost all large public authority as part of a continued companies. According to GAO’s survey, 82 percent of large public effort to assist Congress in companies—the Fortune 1000—saw their choice of auditor as limited to three reviewing concentration in the or fewer firms, and about 60 percent viewed competition in their audit market market for public company audits. as insufficient. Most small public companies reported being satisfied with the The small number of large auditor choices available to them. international accounting firms performing audits of almost all large public companies raises Percentage of Companies Audited by Four Largest Accounting Firms, by Company Size Percentage interest in potential effects on (Number of companies) 98%98% competition and the choices 100 95% 92% available to large companies 90% needing an auditor. This report 80 71% examines (1) concentration in the 60 market for public company audits, 44% (2) the potential for smaller 40 22% accounting firms’ growth to ease 20 market concentration, and (3) (1,606) (794) (1,190) (907) (498) (516) (1,211) (1,513) 0 proposals that have been offered 2002 2006 2002 2006 2002 2006 2002 2006 by others for easing concentration <$100 million $100 million - >$500 million - >$1 billion and the barriers facing smaller $500 million $1 billion firms in expanding their market Company revenue shares.
  • Eric Kimberling Expert Witness

    Eric Kimberling Expert Witness

    Eric Kimberling Expert Witness Eric is a prominent expert and global thought leader in the ERP and enterprise systems market. With over 20 years industry experience, he has helped more than 200 clients globally in manufacturing, distribution, retail, services, energy, utilities, non-profit and government. Eric provides exert witness services including deposition and testimony, case evaluation and report writing. Sample Thought Leadership: Expertise • Author of widely influential ERP YouTube • SAP, Oracle, Microsoft Dynamics, channel, blogs, whitepapers and articles Epicor, and other ERP systems • Author of ERP industry reports • Software Evaluation and Selection • Keynote Speaker – The Manufacturing ERP • Organizational Change Experience – Metalforming Magazine – 2011 Management and 2014 • Program and Project Management • Member of the Denver University Speaker’s • Contract Negotiation Bureau • Expert Witness Testimony • Guest lecturer for Denver University, Colorado • Business Process Optimization University, and University of Rochester • Six Sigma • Lead facilitator of educational ERP Boot Camps • Lean Manufacturing and Value and Digital Stratosphere industry conferences Stream Analysis • Speaker at the AAPA Conference, Managing ERP Projects Conference, Managing Your SAP Sample Expert Witness Cases Projects, and other conferences • Partner Services, Inc v. Avanade • Host of webinar and podcast series covering • The United States of America ERP best practices and the State of Illinois, Ex Rel. • Recovery Ready ERP, Supply and Demand Kathy Pishghadamian v. Nicor Chain Executive, July 2010 Gas • Focus Publications’ List of 25 ERP Experts and • Flotek Industries, Inc. v. CD Influencers to Track in 2010 Group, Inc. • Author of Lessons from 1,000 ERP • California State Controllers Office Implementations - a book detailing ERP best v. SAP practices • Midwest Tape LLC v.
  • Public Accounting, the Big Four

    Public Accounting, the Big Four

    Public Accounting Prepared by Professor Nancy Ghodrat, CPA Public accounting is an area of accounting in which accountants offer expert services to the general public. A major portion of public accounting involves auditing. In auditing, a certified public accountant (CPA) examines company financial statements and provides an opinion as to how accurately the financial statements present the company's results and financial position. Certified Public Accountant (CPA) is the statutory title of qualified accountants in the United States who have passed the Uniform Certified Public Accountant Examination and have met additional state education and experience requirements for certification as a CPA. In California and most other U.S. states, only CPAs who are licensed are able to provide to the public attestation (including auditing) opinions on financial statements. I believe every accounting student should know the names of the four largest international public Accounting Companies (also known as CPA firms.) These firms are 1. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (also branded as Deloitte) 2. PricewaterhouseCoopers (or PWC) 3. Ernst & Young (or EY) 4. KPMG The above firms are referred to as Big 4 (sometimes written as the Big Four). This group was once known as the “Big Eight”. Since 1989, mergers and one major scandal involving Arthur Andersen have reduced the number of major accountancy firms from eight to four. In 2002, Arthur Andersen voluntarily surrendered its licenses to practice as Certified Public Accountants in the United States after being found guilty of criminal charges relating to the firm's handling of the auditing of Enron, the energy corporation, resulting in the loss of 85,000 jobs.
  • World Trusts Us

    World Trusts Us

    Albaraka Türk Sustainability Report 2020 World TTrustsrusts Us Contents 10 KEY SUSTAINABILITY INDICATORS 12 ALBARAKA TÜRK AT A GLANCE 12 Al Baraka Banking Group (ABG) in Brief 14 Albaraka Türk in Brief 16 Albaraka Türk’s Sustainability Journey 18 Shareholding Structure AAlbarakalbaraka TTürkürk is a bank building its entire business momodeldel 19 Our Mission and Vision 20 Our Quality Policy, Core Corporate Values and Strategic Objectives in accordance with sussustainabilitytainability and working for this 22 Operational Map 24 Our Awards purppurpose.ose. 26 MESSAGE FROM THE MANAGEMENT 26 Message from the Chairman 28 Message from the General Manager WWee ccarryarry out aallll our opoperationserations by ttakingaking intintoo account an 30 Message from the Chairman of the Sustainability Committee environmenvironmentalental impacimpactt and trustrustt approach. WeWe consider 32 OUR SUSTAINABILITY ORGANIZATION 32 Al Baraka Goals (2016-2020) the sosocial,cial, environmenvironmentalental and eeconomicconomic vavalueslues we have 34 Strategic Sustainability Areas 36 Sustainability and Social Responsibility Principles within the frframeworkamework of trustrustt and we aim ttoo pass these 37 Principles of Donations and Contributions 38 Our Sustainability Organization vavalueslues on ttoo future genergenerations.ations. 39 Our Committees 40 OUR SUSTAINABILITY ACTIVITIES 40 Our Corporate Governance Approach WWithinithin the scopscopee of sussustainabilitytainability efforefforts,ts, we continue 64 Our Financial Capital 68 Our Manufactured Capital ttoo ttakeake impimportantortant sstepsteps ttoo sosolvelve various worldwide 70 Our Human Capital 80 Our Intellectual Capital probproblemslems such as globagloball warmingwarming,, ccarbonarbon emission and 84 Our Natural Capital 90 Our Social and Relational Capital wawaterter probproblems,lems, and we continue ttoo rereceiveceive the ppositiveositive 94 LOOKING TO THE FUTURE resulresultsts of these ssteps.teps.
  • Security Consulting, Q3 2007 by Khalid Kark and Chris Mcclean for Security & Risk Professionals

    Security Consulting, Q3 2007 by Khalid Kark and Chris Mcclean for Security & Risk Professionals

    September 25, 2007 The Forrester Wave™: Security Consulting, Q3 2007 by Khalid Kark and Chris McClean for Security & Risk Professionals Making Leaders Successful Every Day For Security & Risk Professionals Includes a Forrester Wave™ September 25, 2007 The Forrester Wave™: Security Consulting, Q3 2007 PwC And Deloitte Lead The Pack With KPMG Close Behind by Khalid Kark and Chris McClean with Jonathan Penn and Alissa Dill EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Forrester evaluated leading security consulting service providers across 80 criteria and found that PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) and Deloitte established themselves as Leaders in the security consulting services market — thanks to their breadth of current offerings and their focus on future growth areas. KPMG International established itself as the next strongest with a rich current offering and solid strategy for growth. Ernst & Young (E&Y) and IBM have good market presence and an established client base but lack the breadth of offerings of the Leaders. Accenture has a strong infrastructure background and is ideal for companies looking to develop a security infrastructure and implementation projects but is not as strong in security strategy. Wipro has a relatively new security practice with impressive growth plans that leverage its existing customer base. BT has a good vision and some good relationships that will enable growth, with success to date focused mostly in EMEA. VeriSign and Verizon Business are relatively small practices with a strong US presence and great customer satisfaction among their clients. TABLE OF CONTENTS NOTES & RESOURCES 2 CISOs Need Help In Dealing With Their Forrester conducted services evaluations in Evolving Role July 2007 and interviewed 10 service providers: 4 Security Consulting Evaluation Overview Accenture, BT, Deloitte, Ernst & Young, IBM, KPMG, PricewaterhouseCoopers, VeriSign, 7 The Leaders Have Strong Strategy And Verizon Business, and Wipro.
  • Botta V. Pricewaterhousecoopers

    Botta V. Pricewaterhousecoopers

    Case 3:18-cv-02615-AGT Document 228 Filed 07/26/21 Page 1 of 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA MAURO BOTTA, Case No. 18-cv-02615-AGT Plaintiff, FINDINGS OF FACT AND v. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, Defendant. A bench trial was held in this employment case. The undersigned presided and now explains why judgment will be entered for the defendant, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC). BACKGROUND Public companies pay PwC to audit their financial statements and their internal controls over financial reporting.1 The firm’s audits serve a well-recognized “public watchdog function,” United States v. Arthur Young & Co., 465 U.S. 805, 818 (1984) (simplified), because participants in the capital markets rely on the results in deciding where to invest their money. To further this watchdog function, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB) have issued detailed auditor independence rules. See, e.g., SEC Regulation S-X, 17 C.F.R. § 210.2-01; PCAOB Rules § 3 Pt. 5, Ethics and Independence, https://pcaobus.org/about/rules-rulemaking/rules/section_3. The rules seek to reduce conflicts of interest, which may naturally arise given that auditors are paid for their work by the companies they audit. See generally Te-Kuang Chou, An Examination of the Mechanism and Legal 1 Internal controls are procedures that companies use to prevent and detect errors in their financial statements. If a company requires its accounting staff, each month, to cross-check corporate bank balances against records of deposits and withdrawals, that cross-check would be an internal control.
  • United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division

    United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Texas Houston Division

    Case 20-34114 Document 922 Filed in TXSB on 01/07/21 Page 1 of 24 UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS HOUSTON DIVISION ) In re: ) Chapter 11 ) VALARIS PLC, et al.,1 ) Case No. 20-34114 (MI) ) Debtors. ) (Jointly Administered) ) NOTICE OF AMENDMENT TO THE LIST OF ORDINARY COURSE PROFESSIONALS PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on August 19, 2020, the above-captioned debtors and debtors in possession (collectively, the “Debtors”)2 filed voluntary petitions for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. §§ 101-1532, in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas (the “Court”). PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on September 15, 2020, the Debtors filed the Debtors’ Motion for Entry of an Order (I) Authorizing the Retention and Compensation of Certain Professionals Utilized in the Ordinary Course of Business and (II) Granting Related Relief (the “OCP Motion”) [Docket No. 214]. PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on October 9, 2020, the Court entered the Order (I) Authorizing the Retention and Compensation of Certain Professionals Utilized in the Ordinary Course of Business and (II) Granting Related Relief (the “OCP Order”) [Docket No. 326]. The OCP Order included a nonexclusive list of the Debtors’ ordinary course professionals (“OCPs”), attached thereto as Exhibits 1 and 2 (the “Original OCP List”). PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that on November 11, 2020, the Debtors filed the Notice of Amendment to the List of Ordinary Course Professionals (the “Amended OCP List”) [Docket No. 664]. PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that, pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the OCP Order, the Debtors are authorized to supplement the Original OCP List as necessary to add or remove OCPs, from time to time, in their sole discretion.
  • Conspiracy of Fools”

    Conspiracy of Fools”

    Submitted version of review published in GARP Risk Review Review of “Conspiracy of Fools” Joe Pimbley Kurt Eichenwald’s Conspiracy of Fools (Broadway Books, 2005) is a spellbinding account of the rise and fall of Enron. In nearly 700 pages the reader finds answers to “what happened?” and “how did it happen?” Based on retrospective interviews with more than a hundred primary and secondary actors in this drama, the author creates multiple, parallel story lines. He jumps back and forth between these sub-plots in a manner that maintains energy and gives the reader many natural stopping points. The great strengths of Conspiracy are that it’s thorough, extremely well- written, captivating, and, finally, it rings true. The author avoids the easy, simple conclusions that all the executives are “guilty” of crimes or plain greed and that the media-lionized whistle-blower is pure of heart. We see the ultimate outcome as personal tragedies for Jeff Skilling (President) and Ken Lay (CEO) even though they are undeniably culpable. Culpability and guilt are not synonymous, however, and different readers will have widely different judgments to render on these two men. The view of Andrew Fastow is not so murky. He and a handful of his associates did indeed lie, cheat, and steal for personal gain. Fastow’s principle “contribution” to Enron was the creation of structured finance transactions to skirt accounting rules. This one-sentence description doesn’t tell the reader much. Eichenwald gives many examples to flesh out the concept. The story of “Alpine Investors” provides the simplest case. The company wished to sell the Zond Corporation, a wind-farm operator, prior to the closing of Enron’s purchase of Portland General.
  • 1913 from the Very Beginning of the Firm, Arthur Andersen Insists That All

    1913 from the Very Beginning of the Firm, Arthur Andersen Insists That All

    1913 From the very beginning of the firm, Arthur Andersen insists that all his personnel get the “the facts behind the figures,” thus establishing the concept of a business-oriented audit. The Federal Reserve banking system is created. The 16th Amendment is ratified permitting federal income tax. 1914 The Federal Trade Commission and General Accounting Office are created. The Federal Reserve requires CPA certification of any financial statements submitted in support of applications for loans on commercial paper by member banks. 1915 Arthur Andersen takes the position that a Great Lakes steamship company had to reflect in its balance sheet the economic impact of a major post-year-end event—that is, the loss of a freighter in a storm. This was the first case of an auditor demanding disclosure of an event that occurred after year-end but before the issuance of the auditor’s report. 1916 The firm creates a formal recruitment program for college graduates. The American Association of Public Accountants (founded in 1887) changes its name to the American Institute of Accountants (AIA). 1917 The firm takes the lead in promoting tax work for industries and corporations and introduces a new concept of accounting for construction costs of public utilities, differentiating between overhead costs and direct costs. The first AIA examination is given. The Revenue Act of 1917 imposed the first excess profits tax. 1919 The first chapter of Beta Alpha Psi is established at the University of Illinois. 1921 The firm establishes a government liaison office in Washington, D.C. The American Society of Certified Public Accountants is founded in Washington.