Diving Patterns in Relation to Diet of Gentoo and Macaroni Penguins At

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Diving Patterns in Relation to Diet of Gentoo and Macaroni Penguins At The Condor 90:157-167 0 TheCooper Ornithological Society 1988 DIVING PATTERNS IN RELATION TO DIET OF GENT00 AND MACARONI PENGUINS AT SOUTH GEORGIA ’ J. P. CROXALL British Antarctic Survey,Natural EnvironmentalResearch Council, High Cross,Madingley Road, CambridgeCB3 OET, UK R. W. DAVIS Sea World ResearchInstitute, Hubbs Marine ResearchCenter, 1700 South ShoresRoad, San Diego, CA 92109 M. J. O’CONNELL British Antarctic Survey,Natural EnvironmentalResearch Council, High Cross,Madingley Road, CambridgeCB3 OET, UK Abstract. The depthsattained on 1,444dives by 14 GentooPenguins (Pygoscelis Papua) and 6,352dives by eightMacaroni Penguins (Eudyptes chrysolophus) were recorded,together with the timing and durationof the foragingtrip and the amountand type of prey caught. MacaroniPenguins ate only Antarctickrill Euphausiasuperba. When feedingonly at night they madeno divesdeeper than 20 m; on all-day trips 36% of diveswere between 20 to 80 m. GentooPenguins fed during the day.When theycaught krill, 77%of diveswere shallower than 54 m; when fish were taken, 59% of dives were 54 to 136 m, which is consistent with the benthic-demersalhabit of thejuvenile Nototheniaand Champsocephalusfish they eat. The patternof predationon krill by both penguinspecies is consistentwith its vertical migrationto the surfaceat night and dispersalthrough the water column during the day. The food requirements of chick-rearing Macaroni Penguinswould be met by catching at least six adult krill per dive (or 150 juvenile krill or amphipods). For similar Gentoo Penguins,a minimum of 15 adult krill per dive (one every 8 set), or one fish every third dive, is needed. Recorded interannual variations in krill size can treble these rates, which would also be doubled if half the dives were for travelling, not feeding. Key words: GentooPenguin; Macaroni Penguin; PygoscelisPapua; Eudyptes chrysolo- phus;Antarctic krill; Euphausiasuperba; fish; diving;diet; foraging; prey capturerate. INTRODUCTION In none of thesestudies was it possibleto mea- sure accuratelyboth the time that the birds spent Penguins are the most highly adapted of all birds at sea and also the quantity and identity of food for life under water. However, little is known caught. In this study we obtained the first data about their diving patterns and performance, on the diving patterns of Gentoo (Pygoscelispa- which are fundamental aspectsof their feeding pua) and Macaroni (Eudypteschrysolophus) pen- ecology,influencing the prey they encounter and guins and examine these in relation to foraging their efficient exploitation of these. Recent re- trip timing and duration and to the type and views of feeding ecologyand diving performance amount of food obtained. in penguins (Croxall and Lishman 1987, Kooy- Fieldwork was carried out at Bird Island, South man and Davis 1987) indicate that the depths Georgia (54’S, 38”W), as part of an extensive typically reached during diving by free-living study of the feeding ecology and energy budgets penguins are known for only five species.Only ofthese species(Croxall and Prince 1980a; Davis for King Penguins (Aptenodytes patagonicus), et al. 1983; Davis, Croxall, and O’Connell, un- Chinstrap Penguins (Pygoscelisantarctica), and publ.), in the austral summers of 1984 to 1985 JackassPenguins (Spheniscusdemersus) are data and 1985 to 1986. Macaroni and Gentoo pen- other than maximum depth attained available guins are the two commonest speciesof penguin (Kooymanetal. 1982,LishmanandCroxalll983, at South Georgia (with breeding populations es- Wilson 1985). timated at about 5,000,OOOand 100,000 pairs respectively; Croxall et al. 1984) and they are LReceived 20 March 1987. Final acceptance2 Oc- also abundant at Bird Island (breeding popula- tober 1987. tions of ca. 75,000 and 6,000 pairs respectively; [1571 158 J. P. CROXALL, R. W. DAVIS AND M. J. O’CONNELL Croxall and Prince 1980b). Both species are FORAGING TRIP DURATION therefore important consumers of marine re- When DHRs were being deployed, birds bearing sources at South Georgia, Macaroni Penguins thesewere watched until they entered the seaand being preeminent among avian species(Croxall a continuous watch was then maintained during et al. 1984, Croxall et al. 1985, Croxall and Prince daylight hours until the bird returned. Birds were 1987) but there are numerous biological and eco- weighed before and after the foraging trip. In logical differences between the two species. In both study seasonsthe attendancepatterns ashore the present context the most important of these of a sample (n = 10 to 15 birds originally) of are that Gentoo Penguins mainly feed inshore breeding birds of each specieswas recorded con- (within 10 km of land; Croxall and Prince 1987; tinuously throughout most of the chick-rearing J. L. Bengtson, unpubl. data) and attempt to rear period using radio transmitters and automatic two chicks, which are fed on adult Antarctic krill recording apparatus. The radio transmitters (15 (Euphausiu superba) and young stagesof mainly mm diameter, 50 mm length, 25 g weight) were benthic-demersal notothenioid fish (Croxall and attachedto the penguins’ back featherswith epoxy Prince 1980a, Croxall and Lishman 1987). In resin and hose clamps or plastic tie wraps. To contrast, Macaroni Penguins feed mainly off- record the presenceof these birds at the colony shore, rarely within sight of land, and rear one a Yagi 4-element antenna was mounted on the chick on a diet of both adult and juvenile E. roof of a small wooden blind and connected to superba, fish being very rarely recorded (Croxall a radio receiver (164 MHz) inside, set to scan and Prince 1980a; Croxall et al., in press). continuously in sequencethe frequencies of the METHODS deployed transmitters for 10 set each. The re- ceiver was connected to a strip chart recorder. DIVING DEPTH This systemprovided control data against which The depth histogram recorder (DHR) described the foraging trip durations of the experimental by Kooyman et al. (1983) was used. In brief, this birds could be compared. It also confirmed that is cylindrical (95.0 mm long by 23.0 mm di- penguins do not arrive ashore at the breeding ameter) and weighs 95 g (approximately 1.6% of colony during the night. Data on the foraging- adult Gentoo Penguin and 2.3% of adult male attendance patterns during postbrooding chick- Macaroni Penguin body weight). The DHR con- rearing of paint-marked birds (Croxall, unpubl. tains eight electronic counters which respond to data), whose presencewas recorded on three to different presetpressure thresholds, each of which four visits (of 1 hr each) daily, are consistentwith is equivalent to a different depth. When the pen- those of birds with radios. Thus paint-marked guin dives below the surface of the water, the Gentoo Penguinsspent about 12 hr at sea(range = increase in pressure with depth is converted to 6 to 24 hr; n = 2 10) and Macaroni Penguins a voltage shift by a pressure transducer in the either 12 hr (range = 10-l 6 hr; n = 140) or 24 DHR. If the voltage exceedsthe threshold of one hr (range = 18-50 hr; n = 72). or more of the counters, it is recorded in each of them. The settingof thesethresholds was checked FOOD in the laboratory against a pressurestation before The contents of the stomachs of experimental and after each deployment. The DHR was at- birds returning ashorewere collectedusing stom- tached to feathersin the middle of the back with ach lavage techniques (Wilson 1984). Birds were two small metal hose clips. Each bird was also flushed repeatedly until no more food was ob- given a distinctive paint mark (number or sym- tained; we have confirmed that this corresponds bol) on the breast to facilitate recapture on its to an empty stomach. In 1985 five complete return to the colony. Each recorder was used for stomach samples and in 1986 10 such samples a single foraging trip only, removed when the were obtained weekly from both speciesthrough- bird was recaptured, and the number of dives out the chick-rearing period. These samples en- registered in each counter was read through a abled us to check that experimental birds were decoding processor which was attached to the taking broadly similar prey and had a similar DHR in the laboratory. Birds were selectedafter mass of food in the stomach to other individuals they had fed a chick and when it wasjudged that engaged in similar parental duties at the same they were about to leave the colony to return to stageof the chick-rearingperiod. For control birds sea. in both seasonsand for experimental birds in DIVING AND DIET IN GENT00 AND MACARONI PENGUINS 159 1986, complete stomach contents were weighed Gentoo Penguin fresh at the time of collection and sorted on the same day. Krill (and other crustaceans),fish and Krill Fish squid were sorted,weighed, and preservedin 10% formalin. Both sagittal otoliths were removed from intact fish crania and these, together with -z any loose otoliths, counted and stored dry in plastic tubes. All material was then returned to the United Kingdom for further processing.All n=862 dives krill in samples were counted, including speci- mens representedonly by pairs of eyes.A sample of 100 krill from each stomach was measured, 0 25 50 either the straightened standard length of per- Percent of dives fectly intact specimensor the carapacelength of damaged ones and sex and reproductive status FIGURE 1. Dive depth histograms (proportion of was recorded for as many specimensas possible. dives terminating in each stratum) for Gentoo Pen- Fish otoliths were identified to as low a taxo- guins feeding on fish and krill. nomic categoryas possible, length, breadth, and thickness measured (to 0.01 mm) and weighed by weight) and amphipods Themisto gaudichau- (to 0.001 g). These measurements were used in dii (ca. 20 mm long; 2% by weight). Gentoo Pen- regression equations to estimate the standard guins ate either krill(9 1% by weight, occasionally length and weight of the original fish specimens with one or two fish present) or fish (87% by (using principally data from Hecht [ 19871 and weight, usually with a few krill).
Recommended publications
  • A Global Population Assessment of the Chinstrap Penguin (Pygoscelis
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN A global population assessment of the Chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarctica) Noah Strycker1*, Michael Wethington2, Alex Borowicz2, Steve Forrest2, Chandi Witharana3, Tom Hart4 & Heather J. Lynch2,5 Using satellite imagery, drone imagery, and ground counts, we have assembled the frst comprehensive global population assessment of Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) at 3.42 (95th-percentile CI: [2.98, 4.00]) million breeding pairs across 375 extant colonies. Twenty-three previously known Chinstrap penguin colonies are found to be absent or extirpated. We identify fve new colonies, and 21 additional colonies previously unreported and likely missed by previous surveys. Limited or imprecise historical data prohibit our assessment of population change at 35% of all Chinstrap penguin colonies. Of colonies for which a comparison can be made to historical counts in the 1980s, 45% have probably or certainly declined and 18% have probably or certainly increased. Several large colonies in the South Sandwich Islands, where conditions apparently remain favorable for Chinstrap penguins, cannot be assessed against a historical benchmark. Our population assessment provides a detailed baseline for quantifying future changes in Chinstrap penguin abundance, sheds new light on the environmental drivers of Chinstrap penguin population dynamics in Antarctica, and contributes to ongoing monitoring and conservation eforts at a time of climate change and concerns over declining krill abundance in the Southern Ocean. Chinstrap penguins (Pygoscelis antarctica) are abundant in Antarctica, with past estimates ranging from 3–8 million breeding pairs, and are considered a species of “least concern” by BirdLife International1, but the popula- tion dynamics of this species are not well understood and several studies have highlighted signifcant declines at monitored sites2–6.
    [Show full text]
  • Macaroni Penguin
    Macaroni Penguin Website : https://www.cuteness.com/article/macaroni-penguin-kids Live Camera: https://tnaqua.org/animal/macaroni-penguin/ Macaroni penguins are the most abundant of the different penguin species in the world. They are easily identified by the yellow hairs on the top of their heads. But be careful! This penguin looks a lot like the Royal penguin. The big difference is that the Macaroni penguin has a black face, and the Royal penguin has a white face. Now visit the website. Look at the first paragraph that begins with “Macaroni penguins inhabit a number of islands…”: 1) Where do Macaroni penguins live? a. In my house b. Near Antarctica c. North Pole d. Along the equator 2) What are two threats to Macaroni penguins that come from human beings? (More than one) . a. Leopard seals b. Commercial fishing c. Oil pollution d. Sea lions Go to this section : 3) What other penguin can be confused with the Macaroni penguin? a. Royal penguin b. Emperor penguin c. Antarctic penguin d. Rockhopper penguin 4) About how does this penguin weigh? a. Five pounds b. Seven pounds c. Nine pounds d. Eleven pounds Go to this section : 5) How did this penguin get its name? a. No one knows b. It was named after a hat c. It was named after the food d. It was named after the explorer who found them 6) True or false. The song “Yankee Doodle” was partly about the Macaroni penguin. a. True b. False c. What’s a Doodle? 1 Go to this section : 7) Where do Macaroni penguins lay their eggs? a.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Threatens Penguins
    SEPTEMBER 2009 Climate Change Threatens Penguins By: Shaye Wolf Penguins are not just found in •11 of 18 penguin species are Antarctica declining and considered an Penguins—waddling wonders of extinction risk the Southern Hemisphere Although penguins are commonly associated with Antarctica, penguins •Two species are considered Penguins (order Sphenisciformes, are found in a variety of habitats stable. family Spheniscidae) are flightless in the Southern Hemisphere. seabirds found almost entirely in Eighteen different penguin species •The population status of the the Southern Hemisphere. Although inhabit areas from Antarctica to the remaining five is unknown. their wings have become useless for Equator. They can be divided into Studies have linked climate change flight, they have become superbly three groups: to past, ongoing, and projected adapted to swimming and diving. population declines of many For example, Gentoo penguins •Four penguin species breed in Antarctica and/or the Antarctic penguin species. Because penguins can swim up to 35 km per hour— live in different ocean habitats of compared with 9 km per hour for islands: the Emperor, Adélie, Chinstrap, and Gentoo penguin. the Southern Hemisphere, climate the fastest Olympic swimmer. change affects penguins in these Emperor penguins can dive to •Most penguin species breed on regions in different ways. depths of more than 520 m to find islands in the sub-Antarctic waters food—deeper than any other bird. of the Southern Ocean (a.k.a. How is climate change affecting Penguins must return to land or sea Antarctic Ocean), the South Atlantic Antarctic penguins? ice to rear their young, however, Ocean, the South Pacific Ocean, and they are renowned for their The Antarctic continent is warming and the Southern Indian Ocean: as a whole,1 but the Antarctic feats of endurance as parents.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing UAV Monitoring of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands’ Iconic Land-Based Marine Predators
    fmars-08-654215 May 26, 2021 Time: 18:32 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 01 June 2021 doi: 10.3389/fmars.2021.654215 Developing UAV Monitoring of South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands’ Iconic Land-Based Marine Predators John Dickens1*, Philip R. Hollyman1, Tom Hart2, Gemma V. Clucas3, Eugene J. Murphy1, Sally Poncet4, Philip N. Trathan1 and Martin A. Collins1 1 British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 2 Department of Zoology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, 3 Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States, 4 South Georgia Survey, Stanley, Falkland Islands Many remote islands present barriers to effective wildlife monitoring in terms of Edited by: challenging terrain and frequency of visits. The sub-Antarctic islands of South Georgia Wen-Cheng Wang, National Taiwan Normal University, and the South Sandwich Islands are home to globally significant populations of seabirds Taiwan and marine mammals. South Georgia hosts the largest breeding populations of Antarctic Reviewed by: fur seals, southern elephant seals and king penguins as well as significant populations of Gisele Dantas, wandering, black-browed and grey-headed albatross. The island also holds important Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Brazil populations of macaroni and gentoo penguins. The South Sandwich Islands host the Sofie Pollin, world’s largest colony of chinstrap penguins in addition to major populations of Adélie KU Leuven Research & Development, Belgium and macaroni penguins. A marine protected area was created around these islands in *Correspondence: 2012 but monitoring populations of marine predators remains a challenge, particularly John Dickens as these species breed over large areas in remote and often inaccessible locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Ecology and Diving Behaviour of Macaroni Penguins 27
    1998 Green et al.: Foraging ecology and diving behaviour of Macaroni Penguins 27 FORAGING ECOLOGY AND DIVING BEHAVIOUR OF MACARONI PENGUINS EUDYPTES CHRYSOLOPHUS AT HEARD ISLAND K. GREEN 1,2, R. WILLIAMS 1 & M.G. GREEN 2 1Antarctic Division, Channel Highway, Kingston, Tasmania 7050, Australia 2Current address: National Parks and Wildlife Service, Snowy Mountains Region, PO Box 2228, Jindabyne, New South Wales 2627, Australia ([email protected]) Received 7 May 1997, accepted 6 June 1998 SUMMARY GREEN, K., WILLIAMS, R. & GREEN, M.G. 1998. Foraging ecology and diving behaviour of Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus at Heard Island. Marine Ornithology 26: 27–34. Over the chick-rearing period, Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus foraged to the north-east of Heard Island within an approximate 300-km radius, feeding mainly on euphausiids and fish. As the season progressed, the amount of euphausiids in the diet declined by 93% with the diet becoming almost totally composed of the myctophid fish Krefftichthys anderssoni. Penguins foraged mainly on the Heard Island shelf area (seas shallower than 1000 m). Penguin dive profiles were complex, unlike the simple ‘V’ shaped dives recorded elsewhere. Diving was mainly between dawn and dusk to depths of 10–60 m, and the deepest dives were undertaken during daylight hours. The connection between the observed diving patterns and the diet was difficult to elucidate because K. anderssoni only migrates vertically into surface waters at night and is believed to be out of the penguins’ diving range during the day. INTRODUCTION METHODS Macaroni Penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus on Heard and Diet McDonald Islands are thought to number about two million breeding pairs (Woehler 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Playful Penguins by Melissa Michael
    Playful Penguins By Melissa Michael www.teachertreasurehunter.blogspot.com •Emperor Penguin •King Penguin •Gentoo Penguin •Macaroni Penguin •Adélie Penguin •Little Penguin Emperor Penguin HABITAT: The emperor penguin lives in the Antarctic. It will spend its entire life in the Antarctic waters and on the ice. They are never on land. FOOD: They mostly eat Antarctic silverfish. They may also eat krill or squid. PREDATORS: Their main enemies are orcas and leopard seals. The chicks are also prey for sea birds. COOL FACTS: *The females lay one large egg and then the males take care of it. The males keep the egg on their feet and cover it with their brooding pouch. The brooding pouch is Credit: Photo by Lin Padgham; Creative Commons license loose skin covered with feathers that can APPEARANCE: The emperor penguin has cover the egg. The males will not eat black feathers on its back. The feathers in anything for the 2 months when they care front are white. They have a black head for the egg. and black beak with an orange stripe. *They are the largest penguin in the world. There are yellow patches on each side of its They are about 44 inches tall. head. The chicks have gray feathers with a *They can dive deeper than any other black and white face patch. bird. © 2013 © 2013 Michael Melissa King Penguin HABITAT: They live on islands of the sub- Antarctic and ice-free ocean waters. They never live on pack ice like their close relative the Emperor penguin. FOOD: They eat small fish and some squid.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Predators at South Georgia: an Overview of Recent Bio-Logging Studies
    Mem. Natl Inst. Polar Res., Spec. Issue, 58, 118–132, 2004 ©National Institute of Polar Research Review Marine predators at South Georgia: an overview of recent bio-logging studies Philip N. Trathan* and John P. Croxall British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0ET, UK (*[email protected]) (Received March 21, 2003; Accepted July 15, 2003) Abstract: There is a unique diversity and density of land-based marine predators breeding at Bird Island, South Georgia, operating at a wide variety of spatial and temporal scales. These provide exceptional opportunities for bio-logging studies, the objectives of which have been to investigate trophic interactions in ecosystem contexts (including applications in fish- eries and environmental management and conservation). Associated data from studies on feeding ecology, reproductive performance and population dynamics provide valuable con- textual information for bio-logging analyses. An associated ship-based offshore marine sci- ence programme also provides vital information about the local and regional biological and physical environment, which is both complex and highly variable. Further developments of our bio-logging studies at South Georgia face a number of important challenges. These include: • acquiring samples large enough for statistical analysis; • replicating study sites and/or populations in order to characterize population and species behaviour; • collecting simultaneous data from multiple sensors or devices in order to interpret foraging behaviour; • acquiring key collateral data on prey and environment at appropriate spatial and temporal scales to understand foraging dynamics in context. We illustrate approaches to address some of these challenges from recent studies of the South Georgia marine ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Behavior of Gentoo and Chinstrap Penguins As Determined by New Radiotelemetry Techniques
    FORAGING BEHAVIOR OF GENTOO AND CHINSTRAP PENGUINS AS DETERMINED BY NEW RADIOTELEMETRY TECHNIQUES WAYNE Z. TRIVELPIECE,JOHN L. BENGTSON,1 SUSAN G. TRIVELPIECE, AND NICHOLAS J. VOLKMAN PointReyes Bird Observatory, 4990 Shoreline Highway, Stinson Beach, California 94970 USA ASSTRACT.--Analysisof radio signalsfrom transmittersaffixed to 7 Gentoo(Pygoscelis papua) and 6 Chinstrap (P. antarctica)penguins allowed us to track penguins at sea. Signal charac- teristics allowed us to distinguish among 5 foraging behaviors: porpoising, underwater swimming, horizontal diving, vertical diving, and restingor bathing. GentooPenguins spent a significantly greater portion of their foraging trips engaged in feeding behaviors than Chinstraps,which spent significantly more time traveling. Gentooshad significantly longer feeding dives than Chinstraps(128 s vs. 91 s) and significantlyhigher dive-pauseratios (3.4 vs. 2.6). These differencesin foraging behavior suggestGentoo and Chinstrappenguins may have different diving abilities and may forage at different depths. Received3 June 1985, accepted24 April 1986. THE trophic relationships among Pygoscelis among behaviors during foraging trips. This penguins,the Ad61ie(P. adeliae),Chinstrap (P. method improved our understanding of pen- antarctica),and Gentoo (P. papua),have been a guin feeding efficiencies,ranges, and traveling major focal point of researchin recent years, speeds,and permitted preliminary compari- particularlywith respectto the ecologyof their sons of Gentoo and Chinstrap penguin forag- major prey species,krill (Euphausiasuperba). To ing behaviors. date, however, our knowledge of the birds' METHODS feeding ecologyis largely derived from stom- ach samples obtained ashore (Emison 1968; This studywas conductedat a breedingrookery at Croxall and Furse 1980; Croxall and Prince Point Thomas, King George Island, South Shetland 1980a;Volkman et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Foraging Strategy Plasticity in Fiordland Penguins (Eudyptes Pachyrhynchus): a Stable Isotope Approach
    Marshall University Marshall Digital Scholar Theses, Dissertations and Capstones 2020 FORAGING STRATEGY PLASTICITY IN FIORDLAND PENGUINS (EUDYPTES PACHYRHYNCHUS): A STABLE ISOTOPE APPROACH Jeffrey Wayne White [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://mds.marshall.edu/etd Part of the Animal Sciences Commons, Behavior and Ethology Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons Recommended Citation White, Jeffrey Wayne, "FORAGING STRATEGY PLASTICITY IN FIORDLAND PENGUINS (EUDYPTES PACHYRHYNCHUS): A STABLE ISOTOPE APPROACH" (2020). Theses, Dissertations and Capstones. 1284. https://mds.marshall.edu/etd/1284 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by Marshall Digital Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses, Dissertations and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Marshall Digital Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. FORAGING STRATEGY PLASTICITY IN FIORDLAND PENGUINS (EUDYPTES PACHYRHYNCHUS): A STABLE ISOTOPE APPROACH A thesis submitted to the Graduate College of Marshall University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science In Biology by Jeffrey Wayne White Approved by Dr. Herman Mays, Committee Chairperson Dr. Anne Axel Dr. Jennifer Mosher Dr. John Hopkins III Marshall University May 2020 APPROVAL OF THESIS We, the faculty supervising the work of Jeffrey Wayne White, affirm that the thesis, Foraging strategy plasticity in Fiordland Penguins (Eudyptes pachyrhynchus): A stable isotope approach, meets the high academic standards for original scholarship and creative work established by the Biology Department and the College of Arts and Sciences. This work also conforms to the editorial standards of our discipline and the Graduate College of Marshall University.
    [Show full text]
  • Penguins: up Close and Personal
    Penguins: Up Close and Personal Penguins: Up Close and Personal by ReadWorks A penguin is a type of bird that lives in water and on land. The black-and-white appearance of penguins is known as countershading, which is a form of camouflage that helps keep them safe in the water. Wild penguins are found only in the Southern Hemisphere. Most live within the polar region in very cold climates around Antarctica; however, some species of penguins live in warmer climates in South Africa, New Zealand, and some countries in South America. While there are over 17 different types of penguins, this passage will focus on only three: the emperor penguin, the king penguin, and the little blue penguin. The biggest of all penguins, the emperor penguin, is almost three-and-a-half feet tall-that is almost as tall as the average first grader! And they can weigh up to 88 pounds. Incredibly, emperor penguins breed on the ice in Antarctica during winter. They face temperatures of -22 ReadWorks.org · © 2013 ReadWorks®, Inc. All rights reserved. Penguins: Up Close and Personal degrees Fahrenheit and below. After the female lays an egg, the male keeps the egg warm and protects it for a period of two months-during which time he doesn't eat at all! The female makes a hunting trip for those two months, sometimes traveling up to 50 miles to reach the ocean. When she returns, she regurgitates food for the chick, and then the male goes and finds food for himself. In the wild, emperor penguins live 15 to 20 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Sentinels of the Ocean the Science of the World’S Penguins
    A scientific report from The Pew Charitable Trusts April 2015 Sentinels Of the Ocean The science of the world’s penguins Contents 1 Overview 1 Status of penguin populations 1 Penguin biology Species 3 22 The Southern Ocean 24 Threats to penguins Fisheries 24 Increasing forage fisheries 24 Bycatch 24 Mismatch 24 Climate change 25 Habitat degradation and changes in land use 25 Petroleum pollution 25 Guano harvest 26 Erosion and loss of native plants 26 Tourism 26 Predation 26 Invasive predators 26 Native predators 27 Disease and toxins 27 27 Protecting penguins Marine protected areas 27 Ecosystem-based management 29 Ocean zoning 29 Habitat protections on land 30 31 Conclusion 32 References This report was written for Pew by: Pablo García Borboroglu, Ph.D., president, Global Penguin Society P. Dee Boersma, Ph.D., director, Center for Penguins as Ocean Sentinels, University of Washington Caroline Cappello, Center for Penguins as Ocean Sentinels, University of Washington Pew’s environmental initiative Joshua S. Reichert, executive vice president Tom Wathen, vice president Environmental science division Becky Goldburg, Ph.D., director, environmental science Rachel Brittin, officer, communications Polita Glynn, director, Pew Marine Fellows Program Ben Shouse, senior associate Charlotte Hudson, director, Lenfest Ocean Program Anthony Rogers, senior associate Katie Matthews, Ph.D., manager Katy Sater, senior associate Angela Bednarek, Ph.D., manager Acknowledgments The authors wish to thank the many contributors to Penguins: Natural History and Conservation (University of Washington Press, 2013), upon whose scholarship this report is based. Used by permission of the University of Washington Press The environmental science team would like to thank Dee Boersma, Pablo “Popi” Borboroglu, and Caroline Cappello for sharing their knowledge of penguins by writing and preparing this report.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributions and Predator-Prey Interactions of Macaroni Penguins, Antarctic Fur Seals, and Antarctic Krill Near Bird Island, South Georgia
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 86: 15-30, 1992 Published September 3 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 1 I l Distributions and predator-prey interactions of macaroni penguins, Antarctic fur seals, and Antarctic krill near Bird Island, South Georgia George L. Hunt, ~r',Dennis ~einemann'.',Inigo ~verson~ 'Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California. Irvine, California 92717, USA 'British Antarctic Survey, Natural Environment Research Council, High Cross Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 OET, United Kingdom ABSTRACT: We studied the distributions, abundances and interactions of macaroni penguins Eudyptes chrysolophus, Antarchc fur seals Arctocephalus gazella, and their zooplankton prey, m particular Antarctic krill Euphausia superba, near Bird Island, South Georgia, South Atlantic Ocean, in February 1986. Simultaneous surveys of marine birds, Antarctic fur seals and Antarctic krill were conducted along a series of transects radiating from the breeding colonies of the vertebrate predators. We examined the relationships between the distributions of predators and their prey with respect to the abundance of krill in the water column and marine habitats near the colonies. Antarctic fur seals and macaroni penguins showed positive correlations with Antarctic krill density across a wide range of spatial scales. Because krill was abundant close to the colony and predator densities decreased with distance due to geometry, distance from colony was a confounding variable. When the influences of distance and direction on predator abundance were factored out, we were able to demonstrate an additional influence of Antarctic krill abundance at measurement scales between 10 and 100 km for Antarctic fur seals and for macaroni penguins at the scale of 70 to 100 km.
    [Show full text]