Scanned Image
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Scanned Image
INSIDE Singleschart,6-7;Album chart,17; New Singles,18; New Albums, 13; Airplay guide, 14-15; Independent Labels, 5; Retailing, 12. British Talent on Top Of The World, 8-9. p January 31, 1983 VOLUME FIVE Number 41 75p WEA uses free British acts dominate US tape to push two `hit' 45s labels' Spring schedules WEA HAS introduced a marketing innovation almost unnoticed amid the AFTERA year of major gains for UKflag flying year for the British (see(Atlantic), Gary Moore (Mirage), Light acts in America the US companies havefeature p8 and Mullings p.3). furore of complaints against some of Of The World, Eddie Jobson of Roxyits competitors. lined up a Spring programme of new New music, or techno-pop, domin-Music (Capitol), Fast Way, featuring acts, heavily dominated by the British.ates with such acts as Simple Minds The company is, for a limited edi- Eddie Clark, (Columbia), The Nolanstion, giving away four -track cassettes The beginning of theyearisa(A&M), Heaven 17 (Arista), Malcolm(Epic), Eddy Grant (Portrait), Jakki traditional time for US labels to unveil with two of its chart singles and is McLaren, Blancmange, and Paul HaigWhitren & Tom Cartwright (Elektra),happy to write off the manufacturing the new talent. After the success in '82(all Island), Thomas Dolby (Capitol),Kelly Groucutt of ELO (Riva), Robert by UK acts, and no doubt mindful of the loss. Naked Eyes (EMI America), The Pas-Ellis Orrall (RCA), Rodway (Millen- "I think we've found a novel form of high cost of signing American acts, thesions(Polygram),Tears ForFearsnium). -
Squatted Social Centres in England and Italy in the Last Decades of the Twentieth Century
Squatted social centres in England and Italy in the last decades of the twentieth century. Giulio D’Errico Thesis submitted for the degree of PhD Department of History and Welsh History Aberystwyth University 2019 Abstract This work examines the parallel developments of squatted social centres in Bristol, London, Milan and Rome in depth, covering the last two decades of the twentieth century. They are considered here as a by-product of the emergence of neo-liberalism. Too often studied in the present tense, social centres are analysed here from a diachronic point of view as context- dependent responses to evolving global stimuli. Their ‗journey through time‘ is inscribed within the different English and Italian traditions of radical politics and oppositional cultures. Social centres are thus a particularly interesting site for the development of interdependency relationships – however conflictual – between these traditions. The innovations brought forward by post-modernism and neo-liberalism are reflected in the centres‘ activities and modalities of ‗social‘ mobilisation. However, centres also voice a radical attitude towards such innovation, embodied in the concepts of autogestione and Do-it-Yourself ethics, but also through the reinstatement of a classist approach within youth politics. Comparing the structured and ambitious Italian centres to the more informal and rarefied English scene allows for commonalities and differences to stand out and enlighten each other. The individuation of common trends and reciprocal exchanges helps to smooth out the initial stark contrast between local scenes. In turn, it also allows for the identification of context- based specificities in the interpretation of local and global phenomena. -
Summer 2016.Pdf
Organise! AF Contacts Keep in mind that we have members in most areas of the Issue 86 – Summer 206 UK and so if you do not see a group listed below then please contact us as a general enquiry or the appropriate Organise! is the magazine of the Anarchist Federation regional secretary. (AF). As anarchist communists we fight for a world All General Enquires without leaders, where power is shared equally amongst communities, and people are free to reach Post: BM ANARFED, their full potential. We do this by supporting working London, WC1N 3XX, class resistance to exploitation and oppression, England, UK organise alongside our neighbours and workmates, Email: [email protected] host informative events, and produce publications that Web: http://afed.org.uk help make sense of the world around us. Alba (Scotland) Organise! is published twice/year with the aim to Regional Secretary provide a clear anarchist viewpoint on contemporary [email protected] issues and to initiate debate on ideas not normally Aberdeen (in formation) covered in agitational papers. To meet this target, we [email protected] positively solicit contributions from our readers. We Edinburgh & the Lothians will try to print any article that furthers the objectives of [email protected] anarchist communism. If you’d like to write something Glasgow for us, but are unsure whether to do so, then feel free to [email protected] contact us through any of the details below. Inverness and the Highlands [email protected] The articles in this issue do not represent the collective viewpoint of the AF unless stated as such. -
Squatted Social Centres in London
Article Squatted Social Centres in London Contention: The Multidisciplinary Journal of Social Protest Peer Reviewed Journal Vol. 4(1-2), pp. 109-127 (2016) ISSN 2330-1392 © 2016 The Authors SQUATTED SOCIAL CENTRES IN LONDON: TEMPORARY NODES OF RESISTANCE TO CAPITALISM E.T.C.DEE INDEPENDENT SCHOLAR Abstract This article assesses squatted social centres in London as a means to understand the cycles, contexts and institutionalisation processes of the local squatters movement. This diffuse social movement had its heyday in the late 1970s and early 1980s when there were 30,000 squatters and still exists today despite squatting in residential buildings being criminalised in 2012. Analysis is based on a database of 245 social centres, which are examined in terms of duration, time period, type of building and location. Important centres are briefly profiled and important factors affecting the squatters movement are examined, in particular institutionalisation, gentrification and criminalisation. Keywords Social centres; urban squatting; squatters movement; London; social movements Corresponding author: E.T.C.Dee, Email: [email protected] Thanks to all the people who helped me with this project, plus the various libraries and infoshops I worked in. All errors and omissions are mine. This article was written as part of the MOVOKEUR research project CSO2011-23079 (The Squatters Movement in Spain and Europe: Contexts, Cycles, Identities and Institutionalization, funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation 2012-2014). Editorial Note: This aticle is not part of the special issue. 109 Contention Vol. 4 Issue 1-2 October 2016 n this article, I intend to analyse the contexts, cycles and institutionalisation processes of the Ipolitical squatters movement in London. -
Anarchist Mmweekly
anarchist mm weekly Vol. 34 No, 32 11 August, 1973 GREAT CONTROVERSY has been pro On the national plane we have and his Government are moved by duced in Britain by the deci been promised the development the same springs as Gravelham sion to go on with the complex of the long-debated, long de Parish Council. plan for a new town, a road layed Channel Tunnel and the In Gravelham (not its real network and a new airport at omnipresent moribund Concorde. name) the samo growls are heard Maplin (formerly Foulness Economically, Government, Oppo as centre round Maplin. "You Island) in Essex, In a small sition and much of the popula can't stand in the way of pro village in Suffolk a great con tion have been entrapped (Tony gress". Gravelham must be troversy has been produced by Benn notably) in the dangling dragged kicking and screaming the decision to open up a bait of provision of employment. into the twenty-first century. gravel-pit which necessitates These operations have taken It's later than we think.) The heavier usage by lorries of old argument is produced (which picturesque country lanes. their place beside Hitler's autobahns and the Tennessee sounds startlingly new) that The two problems are the Valley Authority as examples of our forefathers objected to macrocosm and microcosm of the economic 'pump-priming'. On a railways hence they were built apparent dilemma facing man in world scale, war, the prepara well outside towns with the society today. For anarchists tions foe war, and space travel consequent inconvenience to the problem is particularly ac perform the same functions of town-dwellers; many a feudal, ute since it involves concepts providing employment and put landowner-, defied the railways of progress and (in opposition) ting money into circulation. -
The Hidden Legality of the Uk Social Centre Movement
FINDING SPACE FOR RESISTANCE THROUGH LEGAL PLURALISM: THE HIDDEN LEGALITY OF THE UK SOCIAL CENTRE MOVEMENT Lucy Finchett-Maddock This paper concerns the practices and tactics of the contemporary anti-authoritarian movements, specifically that of the social centre ilk, and their interactions with the law, and the determination of their own law. The social centre movement uses a mish-mash of both illegal and legal forms, labelled illegitimate by the law and yet incorporating and manifesting new forms of law at the same time. Social centres will be argued as embodying spaces of resistance that are created through the navigation of alternative normative fields, in parallel with the influence of the state order. These innately anti-authoritarian forms of resistance actually operate in a law- making fashion, creating what will be described as ‘hidden law’. This is law that evades the spotlight of the system and is non-hierarchical, non-representative and non-coercive. It is the intention of this paper to highlight these legal/illegal processes and forms of hidden law as instances of resistance to social injustice through the aegis of legal pluralism, and to discuss its embodiment of either a ‘strong’ or ‘weak’ pluralistic nature. Five unstructured interviews were undertaken as research for this paper, from members of the squatting and social centre community in Bristol and London, alongside members of the collectives of ‘rampART’, ‘56a Infoshop’ and ‘The Library House’ social centres (all of which in London), plus those of ‘Kebele’ (Bristol) and ‘Cowley Club’ (Brighton). These interviews took place between 2007 and 2009. © Copyright 2010 – Lucy Finchett-Maddock - 31 - JOURNAL OF LEGAL PLURALISM 2010 – nr. -
An Anarchists Wetherspoons Or Virtuous Resistance? Social Centres As Macintyres Vision of Practice-Based Communities
An Anarchist’s Wetherspoons or Virtuous Resistance? An Anarchist’s Wetherspoons1 or Virtuous Resistance? Social Centres as MacIntyre’s Vision of Practice-based Communities Lucy Finchett-Maddock This paper uses narrative from the social centre movement in the UK to argue that social centres are examples of the MacIntyrean small communities that can virtuously resist the overbearing market influence. Looking at the contrast between rented and squatted centres, the paper argues that those that are squatted are practice-based communities, and those that are rented, are institutions. This therefore highlights the interrupting role of the market and argues that the rented centres as incompatible with MacIntyre’s ideal. Introduction MacIntyre claims that we should work to make small communities that are capable of preserving the practices and virtues previously suffocated by the force of liberal capitalism, a reality. Accordingly, MacIntyre states ‘…it is important that the construction of such an alternative cannot begin from any kind of philosophical or theoretical statement. Where then does it begin? Only in the struggles, conflicts, and work of practice and in the attempt to find in and through dialogue with others who are engaged in such struggles, conflicts, and work an adequate local and particular institutional expression of our shared directedness towards our common goods’.2 In this paper, my aim is to offer the radical movements of our time, as examples of such small communities, as sites of contested dialogue with the purpose of the common good as their quintessence. Each individual internalises involvement in the ‘practices’ and virtues, through their everyday interactions, internal organisation, and external protest. -
Aesthetic of Our Anger. Anarcho-Punk, Politics and Music Edited by Mike Dines & Matthew Worley
Minor Compositions Open Access Statement – Please Read This book is open access. This work is not simply an electronic book; it is the open access version of a work that exists in a number of forms, the traditional printed form being one of them. All Minor Compositions publications are placed for free, in their entirety, on the web. This is because the free and autonomous sharing of knowledges and experiences is important, especially at a time when the restructuring and increased centralization of book distribution makes it difficult (and expensive) to distribute radical texts effectively. The free posting of these texts does not mean that the necessary energy and labor to produce them is no longer there. One can think of buying physical copies not as the purchase of commodities, but as a form of support or solidarity for an approach to knowledge production and engaged research (particularly when purchasing directly from the publisher). The open access nature of this publication means that you can: • read and store this document free of charge • distribute it for personal use free of charge • print sections of the work for personal use • read or perform parts of the work in a context where no financial transactions take place However, it is against the purposes of Minor Compositions open access approach to: • gain financially from the work • sell the work or seek monies in relation to the distribution of the work • use the work in any commercial activity of any kind • profit a third party indirectly via use or distribution of the work • distribute in or through a commercial body (with the exception of academic usage within educational institutions) The intent of Minor Compositions as a project is that any surpluses generated from the use of collectively produced literature are intended to return to further the development and production of further publications and writing: that which comes from the commons will be used to keep cultivating those commons. -
Anarchist Heterotopias : Post-1968 Libertarian Com- Munities in Britain and Italy
ORBIT-OnlineRepository ofBirkbeckInstitutionalTheses Enabling Open Access to Birkbeck’s Research Degree output Anarchist heterotopias : post-1968 libertarian com- munities in Britain and Italy https://eprints.bbk.ac.uk/id/eprint/40310/ Version: Full Version Citation: Lapolla, Luca (2018) Anarchist heterotopias : post-1968 liber- tarian communities in Britain and Italy. [Thesis] (Unpublished) c 2020 The Author(s) All material available through ORBIT is protected by intellectual property law, including copy- right law. Any use made of the contents should comply with the relevant law. Deposit Guide Contact: email ANARCHIST HETEROTOPIAS: POST-1968 LIBERTARIAN COMMUNITIES IN BRITAIN AND ITALY Luca Lapolla Birkbeck, University of London Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements of the degree of Doctor of Philosophy 1 Statement of originality I, Luca Lapolla, confirm that the research included within this thesis is my own work. Previously published material is acknowledged below. I attest that I have exercised reasonable care to ensure that the work is original and does not, to the best of my knowledge, break any UK law, infringe any third party’s copyright or other Intellectual Property Right. Luca Lapolla 16 October 2017 2 Acknowledgments Doing a PhD can often feel like a solitary voyage through uncharted waters, or through uncharted communities, as in my case. Throughout my journey, though, I have encountered many people who have helped me in lots of different ways. This thesis would simply not exist without their suggestions, words of encouragement, and stimulating discussions. Thanking them all here is the least I could do. Although some of them would probably prefer a pint.