Captive Insurance Study Washington State Department of Revenue and Office of Insurance Commissioner

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Captive Insurance Study Washington State Department of Revenue and Office of Insurance Commissioner MILLIMAN REPORT Captive Insurance Study Washington State Department of Revenue and Office of Insurance Commissioner January 18, 2021 Joel S. Chansky, FCAS, MAAA Craig R. Brophy, FCAS, MAAA David R. Kennerud, FCAS, MAAA Joseph T. Holahan, JD 1301 5th Avenue, Suite 3800 Seattle, WA 98101 USA Tel +1 206 624-7940 Fax +1 206 749 6227 Milliman milliman.com Milliman MILLIMAN REPORT Table of Contents I. Background, Scope, and Intended Purpose ..........................................................3 A. Background.....................................................................................................................3 B. Scope and Purpose.........................................................................................................4 C. Limitations on Distribution ...............................................................................................5 II. Executive Summary...............................................................................................6 A. Overview .........................................................................................................................6 B. Captive Insurance Is Both Simple and Complicated ........................................................8 C. Captive Insurers Are Different Than Other Insurers.......................................................10 D. Why Do Companies Use Captive Insurance Companies?.............................................11 E. Captive Insurance Activity in Washington......................................................................13 F. Projected Captive Insurance Premium and Premium Tax Revenues.............................15 III. Insurance Regulation and Taxation .....................................................................19 A. Background...................................................................................................................19 B. Regulation and Taxation of Insurance ...........................................................................19 C. Regulation and Taxation of Insurance in Washington....................................................21 IV. Captive Insurance: What, Why, How Much In Washington..................................26 A. The Different Types of Captive Insurers ........................................................................26 B. Why Captive Insurance Is Used: Benefits of Captive Insurers and Discussion of “Reimbursement Policies” for “Retained Risk” ..........................................................................32 C. How Much: The Survey – What is the Extent of Captive Insurance in Washington........35 V. How Current Washington Law Treats Captive Insurance Premiums ...................40 VI. Relevant Federal Law..........................................................................................41 A. Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act of 2010.......................................................41 B. How the IRS Defines Insurance / IRS Litigation of Captive Insurers ..............................41 C. Federal Excise Taxes on Foreign Insurance and Reinsurance......................................43 D. Department of Labor Rules on Captives Insuring Employee Benefits............................43 VII. How Do Other States Regulate and Tax Captive Insurance................................44 A. Regulation of Captive Insurance....................................................................................44 B. Taxation of Captive Insurance.......................................................................................47 VIII. Policy Considerations and Revenue Forecasts ...................................................53 A. Policy Considerations....................................................................................................53 B. Projected Captive Insurance Premium and Premium Tax Revenues.............................63 C. Estimated Unpaid Taxes ...............................................................................................63 IX. Disclosures and Limitations .................................................................................65 1 Washington State Department of Revenue and Office of the Insurance Commissioner January 18, 2021 Captive Insurance Study Milliman MILLIMAN REPORT A. Acknowledgement of Qualifications...............................................................................65 B. Data and Information.....................................................................................................65 C. Uncertainty....................................................................................................................65 Appendix A Excerpts from Contract and RFQQ.........................................................69 Appendix B Technical Appendix ................................................................................74 Appendix B1 An Overview of How the Insurance Industry Functions ....................................75 Appendix B2 How OIC Collects Premium Taxes and How DOR Collects B&O Taxes...........78 Appendix B3 Captive Insurance Regulation in Non-Domiciliary States..................................82 Appendix B4 Federal Law – Nonadmitted and Reinsurance Reform Act...............................86 Appendix B5 Federal Law – How IRS Defines Insurance/IRS Litigation of Captive Insurers .93 Appendix B6 Federal Law – Limitations on State Authority to Tax Captive Insurance ...........98 Appendix B7 Costs of Owning and Operating a Captive Insurer .........................................102 Appendix B8 Benefits of Captive Insurers ...........................................................................107 Appendix B9 Federal Tax Benefits – Single Parent Captive Insurers ..................................130 Appendix B10 Federal Tax Benefits – 831(b) Captive Insurance Companies ....................134 Appendix B 11 Captive Insurance in Washington – Survey Results....................................137 Appendix B 12 Estimates of Premium and Tax Revenue....................................................146 Appendix C Insurance Premium Tax Statistics by State ..........................................150 Appendix D Forecasts of Captive Insurance Company Numbers, Premiums, and Tax Revenues 151 Appendix E Results of Tax Savings Model ..............................................................152 Appendix F Captive Insurance Survey Questions....................................................153 Appendix G Captive Insurance Study Report Excerpts ............................................154 2 Washington State Department of Revenue and Office of the Insurance Commissioner January 18, 2021 Captive Insurance Study Milliman MILLIMAN REPORT I. Background, Scope, and Intended Purpose A. Background The state of Washington provided us with the following background information: “The Washington state (“Washington” or “the State”) insurance market is the 35th largest in the world, and insurance is the 8th largest industry in the State, with $47 billion in annual premiums. Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler protects consumers through fair and effective regulation of the insurance industry and collected over $1.2 billion in insurance premium taxes over the past 2 fiscal years for the general fund. State law requires Commissioner Kreidler to collect premium taxes on most insurance transactions. In 2018, Commissioner Kreidler discovered some Washington companies had created captive insurance companies in other states to cover Washington insurance risk without paying premium taxes on these risks. Captive insurance activity is legally designated as unauthorized insurance activity and a violation of State insurance code. In 2018, Commissioner Kreidler found that Microsoft’s captive, Cypress Insurance Co., engaged in the unauthorized business of insurance from 2009 through 2018, owing $573,403 in unpaid premium taxes. Cypress Insurance Co. acknowledged its unauthorized activity and in September 2018 paid all unpaid premium taxes and $302,915 in interest and penalties. All $876,318 collected for this unauthorized activity went to the State’s general fund. In 2019, Commissioner Kreidler found Costco’s captive, NW RE Limited, engaged in the unauthorized business of insurance from 2008 through 2019, owing $2,392,907 in unpaid premium taxes. NW Re Limited acknowledged its unauthorized activity and in April 2019 paid all unpaid premium taxes and $1,241,188 in interest and penalties. All $3,634,095 collected for this unauthorized activity went to the general fund. During the 2020 legislative session, at the request of legislative leadership, Commissioner Kreidler discontinued enforcement action against Alaska Airlines’ and Starbucks’ captive insurers, pending completion of a study on captive insurance to understand, among other things, the extent of the use of captive 3 Washington State Department of Revenue and Office of the Insurance Commissioner January 18, 2021 Captive Insurance Study Milliman MILLIMAN REPORT insurance in Washington and options for regulating and taxing captive insurance in Washington.”1 Specifically, together with the Washington Department of Revenue (“DOR”), the Office of Insurance Commissioner (“OIC”) was asked to study the taxation and regulation of captive insurance more closely with the help of outside, independent captive insurance experts. In April of 2020, the State issued Request for Quotes and Qualifications (“RFQQ”) #S202107 seeking proposals to conduct a study on captive insurance on behalf of the OIC and DOR (collectively
Recommended publications
  • The Gold Standard of the South Tennessee’S Director of Captive Insurance Belinda Fortman Discusses the State’S Latest Milestone of 700 Risk Bearing Entities
    www.captiveinsurancetimes.com The primary source of global captive insurance news and analysis 06 January 2021 - Issue 214 The gold standard of the southTennessee’s director of captive insurance Belinda Fortman discusses the state’s latest milestone of 700 risk bearing entities District of Columbia | New and Emerging Risks | 2021 Predictions | Industry Appointments The World’s Leading Independent Captive Manager SRS Europe is changing the Face of European Captive Management Specialist focus on captive insurance management and consultancy... It’s all we do Offering impartial advice and bespoke solutions without conflicting internal vested interests... It’s how we do it Driven by client service excellence underpinned by flexible, innovative and solid delivery... It’s focused on you Our Services European Operations Captive management Ireland Feasibility studies Liechtenstein Program management Luxembourg and underwriting services Malta Governance, risk & Netherlands compliance consulting Sweden Strategic reviews Switzerland Find out why over 500 captive clients trust SRS strategicrisks.com Captive Insurance Times Issue 214 www.captiveinsurancetimes.com Published by Black Knight Media Ltd 16 Bromley Road, New Beckenham Beckenham, BR3 5JE Editorial Editor: Becky Bellamy [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0927 Reporter: Maria Ward-Brennan [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0923 Contributor: Maddie Saghir [email protected] Designer: James Hickman [email protected] Marketing and sales Publisher: Justin Lawson [email protected] Associate Publisher: John Savage [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0932 Office Manager: Chelsea Bowles Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0930 Follow us on Twitter: @CITimes Copyright © 2021 Black Knight Media Ltd All rights reserved.
    [Show full text]
  • Guernsey 2014
    GUERNSEY 2014 From the publishers of GROWTH The captive space continues to demonstrate significant growth on the island STRUCTURE Why insurance-linked securities and PCCs are proving to be popular captive structures LOCATION How Guernsey offers an alternative location to other European domiciles 001_CRGuernsey2014_Cover.indd 1 07/02/2014 16:48 High-flying CORPORATE & COMMERCIAL / TRUST & FIDUCIARY / FUNDS INSURANCE / PROPERTY / DISPUTE RESOLUTION / INSOLVENCY Advocates PO Box 69, La Vieille Cour, La Plaiderie St Peter Port, Guernsey GY1 4BL Tel +44 (0)1481 713371 www.babbelegal.com Untitled-30616BAB_Ad_CaptiveReview_GR_200114_Fnl.indd 1 1 05/02/201420/01/2014 17:3216:10 FOREWORD Strategic thinking puts Guernsey in first position he Guernsey Financial Services Commis- Of particular importance is our regulatory sion (GFSC) licensed 89 new interna- regime which continues to respond to innova- REPORT EDITOR T tional insurers during 2013. This means tive proposals and this was reinforced by the Karolina Kaminska there were 758 international insurers licensed GFSC’s decision to form an Innovation Unit +44 (0)20 7832 6654 in the island at the end of December 2013. within the regulator. [email protected] A signifi cant proportion of the licences is- Guernsey also o ers proportionality STAFF WRITER sued were associated with structures related through meeting the insurance core principles Alexis Burris to insurance linked securities (ILS). This in- of the International Association of Insurance +44 (0) 20 7832 6656 cluded a Shariah-compliant ILS structure that Supervisors (IAIS). The decision taken in Janu- [email protected] was judged as the top innovative deal in Eu- ary 2011 not to seek equivalence with Solvency GROUP HEAD OF CONTENT rope and one of the Islamic fi nance Deals of II looks prescient in the light of the recent an- Gwyn Roberts the Year 2013 by Islamic Finance News.
    [Show full text]
  • English Economic Commission for Latin
    LIMITED LC /CAR/L. 210 ( Sem. 1 / 3 ) 3 February 1987 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR LATIN AMERICA AND THE CARIBBEAN Subregional Headquarters for the Caribbean UNITED NATIONS DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMME UNITED NATIONS CONFERENCE ON TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT Regional Workshop on Trade in Services St. John's, Antigua and Barbuda 10-12 March 1987 CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES IN THE CARIBBEAN - AN ANALYSIS by Greg L* Christie- The author is a lecturer in law at the University of the West Indies and is Director of the University's LL.M. Insurance Law postgraduate programme at the University's Cave Hill campus in Barbados. He is a member of the Barbados Institute of Insurance. This document has been prepared without formal editing. The views expressed are those of the Consultant and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of the Organizations. CONTENTS c (1) AN OVERVIEW OF CAPTIVE INSURANCE COMPANIES Page 1.1 THE CAPTIVE DEFINED 1 1.2 THE GROWTH DF THE WORLD CAPTIVE INDUSTRY 2 1.3 TYPES OF CAPTIVES 4 1. The Single Parent Owned Captive 2. The Group Captive 3. The Association Captive 4. The Rent-A-Captive 5. The Agency Captive 6. The Direct Writing Captive and the Reinsurance Capt ive 7. The Domestic captive and the Offshore Captive 1.4 REASONS FOR CAPTIVE FORMATION 15 1. Cost Reductions 2. Enhanced Cash Flow and Investment Income 3. Access to Reinsurance Markets 4. Personalized Coverage 5.. Provision of Coverage not Otherwise Available 6. Freedom of Investment and Movement of Funds 7. Enhanced Loss Control and Risk Management 1.5 CRITERIA FOR SELECTING CAPTIVE LOCATION 23 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Work in Progress Work Is Underway to Boost Captive Growth in Hong Kong but Will Updated Legislation Be Enough to Draw in New Captives?
    www.captiveinsurancetimes.com The primary source of global captive insurance news and analysis 27 May 2020 - Issue 199 Work in progress Work is underway to boost captive growth in Hong Kong but will updated legislation be enough to draw in new captives? Barbados Insight CIC Services vs IRS Emerging Talent Justin Cole of DGM Financial Sean King of CIC Services discusses Mike Scott Group discusses the current the firm’s upcoming case against Assistant vice president captive climate in Barbados the IRS in the Supreme Court Global Captive Management Captive Insurance Times Issue 199 www.captiveinsurancetimes.com Published by Black Knight Media Ltd 16 Bromley Road, New Beckenham Beckenham, BR3 5JE Editorial Editor: Becky Bellamy [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0927 cover image by weerasak_saeku/shutterstock.com Reporter: Maria Ward-Brennan [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0923 Contributor: Maddie Saghir [email protected] Designer: James Hickman [email protected] Marketing and sales Associate Publisher: John Savage [email protected] Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0932 Publisher: Justin Lawson [email protected] Office Manager: Chelsea Bowles Tel: +44 (0)208 075 0930 Follow us on Twitter: @CITimes Copyright © 2020 Black Knight Media Ltd All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without permission in writing from the publisher. Company reg: 0719464 www.captiveinsurancetimes.com WE KNOW CAPTIVE INSURANCE. For more than 70 years, no firm has had a more complete understanding of the captive and self- insured market than Milliman.
    [Show full text]
  • Republic of Vanuatu Insurance Act No. 54 of 2005
    REPUBLIC OF VANUATU INSURANCE ACT NO. 54 OF 2005 Arrangement of Sections PART 1 PRELIMINARY 1 Interpretation 2 Meaning of insurance policy 3 Marine Insurance Act PART 2 – THE COMMISSION’S ADMINISTRATION OF THE ACT 4 The objectives of insurance supervision 5 Applications to the Commission 6 Powers of the Commission to obtain information and documents 7 On site inspections 8 Variations to an advertisement, brochure or similar document 9 Policy classification 10 Appointment of Inspector 11 Investigation by inspectors 12 Exchange of information with other insurance supervisors 13 Confidentiality PART 3 LICENCES 14 Licence to conduct insurance business 15 Domestic insurers to maintain assets 16 Licensing of insurance broker, insurance agent and independent insurance salesperson 17 Application for licence 18 Additional information and consideration of a licence application 19 Licence 20 Conditions of licence 21 Variation and cancellation of conditions of a licence 22 A licensee’s obligation 23 Reporting duties of an insurance manager 24 Restriction on activities of insurer 25 Suspension of a licence 26 Revocation of the suspension of a licence 27 Cancellation of licence 28 Failure to commence or continue a licensed business 1 29 Prohibition on using certain words or doing certain acts 30 Unlicensed person cannot conduct insurance business PART 4 CAPITAL ADEQUACY 31 Minimum capital 32 Maintenance of financially sound condition 33 Assets of an insurer 34 Categories of assets 35 Deeming provisions of assets 36 Life insurer’s liabilities 37 General
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Return (Indiana State University Foundation TX1018 [6/30/2018] (In
    Return of Organization Exempt From Income Tax OMB No. 1545-0047 Form 990 À¾µ» Under section 501(c), 527, or 4947(a)(1) of the Internal Revenue Code (except private foundations) I Do not enter social security numbers on this form as it may be made public. Open to Public Department of the Treasury I Internal Revenue Service Go to www.irs.gov/Form990 for instructions and the latest information. Inspection A For the 2017 calendar year, or tax year beginning 07/01 , 2017, and ending 06/30, 20 18 C Name of organization D Employer identification number B Check if applicable: INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION, INC 35-6045550 Address change Doing business as Name change Number and street (or P.O. box if mail is not delivered to street address) Room/suite E Telephone number Initial return 30 N. FIFTH STREET (812) 237-6100 Final return/ City or town, state or province, country, and ZIP or foreign postal code terminated Amended TERRE HAUTE, IN 47809 G Gross receipts $ 26,861,307. return Application F Name and address of principal officer: ANDREA L. ANGEL H(a) Is this a group return for Yes X No pending subordinates? 30 N. FIFTH STREET TERRE JHAUTE, IN 47809 H(b) Are all subordinates included? Yes No I Tax-exempIt status: X 501(c)(3) 501(c) ( ) (insert no.) 4947(a)(1) or 527 If "No," attach a list. (see iInstructions) J Website: WWW.INDSTATEFOUNDATION.ORG I H(c) Group exemption number K Form of organization: X Corporation Trust Association Other L Year of formation: 1928 M State of legal domicile: IN Part I Summary 1 Briefly describe the organization's mission or most significant activities: THE FOUNDATION INSPIRES OTHERS TO e BECOME INVOLVED IN THE LIFE OF INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY AND SECURES c n a THE SOURCES TO ENSURE THE UNIVERSITY'S GROWTH AND SUCCESS n r I e 2 Check this box if the organization discontinued its operations or disposed of more than 25% of its net assets.
    [Show full text]
  • Vermont Sales Tax Exemption Certificate J for Form RESALE and EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS S-3 Ii~ -:~ · U - 32 V.S.A
    Vermont Department of Taxes 133 State Street • P.O. Box 547 • Montpelier, Vermon t 05601-0547 SALES AND USE TAX REGISTRATION THIS LI CENSE IS HERBY ISSUED TO UN IVE RSITY or MAIN E SYSTEM LOCATED AT 16 CENTR AL ST, BANGOR, ME UN DER THE PROV ISIONS OF CHAPTER 233, 32 V.S .A. AN D MUST BE SU R.RENDER.ED UPON SA LE, TRANS FER, MERGE R OR TER.M rNATION OF BUS INESS, OR UPON REVOCATION OF THE LI CENSE. UN I VE RSITY Of MAINE SYS TEM 1 6 CENTRAL STREET BAN GO R, ME 04401 CommissionerofTaxes This license is issued effective October I, 2007 to Vermont busi ness tax account number 450-0 I 6000769F-OI. It is not transferable (See other side). Display this license ill a prominent place at the business location. Vermont Sales Tax Exemption Certificate j for Form RESALE AND EXEMPT ORGANIZATIONS S-3 ii~ -:~ · u - 32 V.S.A. §9701 (5}; §9743(1 )-(3) To be filed with the SELLER, not with the VT Department ofTaxes. D Single Purchase - Enter Purchase Price$ ________ D Multiple Purchase (effective for subsequent purchases.) Federal ID Number Stale Zip State Zip Description Description of purchased articles: Basis for Exemption D For resale/wholesale. Vermont Account Number: ___ _ _ _ _ _ ______ D Purchase by 50 l(c)(3) organization which is reli gious, educational, or scientifi c. Vermont Account Number: ---------------------~ D Direct payment by Federal or Vermont governmental unit D Purchase by volunteer fire department, ambulance company, rescue squad (Registration is not required.) I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the statements provided here are true and correct.
    [Show full text]
  • Tax Reform Options: Marginal Rates on High-Income Taxpayers, Capital Gains, and Dividends
    Embargoed Until 10am September 14, 2011 Statement of Leonard E. Burman Daniel Patrick Moynihan Professor of Public Affairs Maxwell School Syracuse University Before the Senate Committee on Finance Tax Reform Options: Marginal Rates on High-Income Taxpayers, Capital Gains, and Dividends September 14, 2011 Chairman Baucus, Ranking Member Hatch, Members of the Committee. Thank you for inviting me to testify on tax reform options affecting high-income taxpayers. I applaud the committee for devoting much of the past year to examining ways to make the tax code simpler, fairer, and more conducive to economic growth, and I’m honored to be asked to contribute to those deliberations. In summary, here are my main points: Economic theory suggests that the degree of progressivity should balance the gains from mitigating economic inequality and risk-sharing against the costs in terms of disincentives created by higher tax rates. The optimal top tax rate depends on social norms and the government’s revenue needs. Experience and a range of empirical evidence suggests that the rates in effect in the 1990s would not unduly diminish economic growth. However, a more efficient option would be to broaden the base (reform or eliminate tax expenditures and eliminate loopholes) to achieve distributional goals while keeping top rates relatively low. The biggest loophole is the lower tax rate on capital gains. Several bipartisan tax reform plans, including the Bipartisan Policy Center plan that I contributed to, would tax capital gains at the same rate as other income. Combined with a substantial reduction in tax expenditures, this allows for a cut in top income rates while maintaining the progressivity of the tax system.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Establishing Insurance Companies in Guernsey
    GUIDE TO ESTABLISHING INSURANCE COMPANIES IN GUERNSEY CONTENTS PREFACE 1 1. Introduction 2 2. Authorisation 2 3. Minimum Criteria for Licensing 2 4. Requirements for Licensing under the Insurance Law 3 5. Directors and a General Representative 3 6. Financial Requirements 4 7. Fees 5 8. Appointment of Actuary 6 9. Appointment of Auditors 6 10. Duration of Licence 6 11. Annual Return 6 12. Economic Substance 6 13. Conditions of Insurance Licence 7 PREFACE This Guide is intended to provide broad information as to the establishment of an insurance company in Guernsey. It is recognised that this Guide will not completely answer detailed questions which clients and their advisers may have; it is not intended to be comprehensive. If any such questions arise in relation to the contents, they should be addressed to any member of the Corporate Team, using the contact information provided at the end of this Guide. Appleby Guernsey March 2019 applebyglobal.com 1 1. INTRODUCTION Guernsey is well renowned for its insurance industry, which has origins dating back to the 18th century and has an excellent reputation for innovation and professionalism in international insurance. Guernsey’s insurance sector includes commercial insurers and captive insurance companies which have been incorporated in the Island since 1922. Guernsey has grown to become the leading captive insurance domicile in Europe. Guernsey offers a range of structuring options for insurance companies, depending on their requirements, which include limited companies, protected cell companies (known as PCCs) and incorporated cell companies (known as ICCs). Guernsey was the first jurisdiction to introduce a PCC in 1997 and has been regularly using cell companies and refining the concept since then.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Captives
    An Introduction to Captives Sophisticated organisations are continuously provide any available solutions to the looking to develop successful risk financing company due to: strategies, and many utilise a captive to – lack of cover for a difficult to insure risk accomplish this goal. In this article, Adrian – restricted capacity as regards coverage, Sykes explains captives, their benefits, the limits, or policy terms. typical profile of their owners and more. • As a licensed insurer, a captive has the A captive: what exactly is it? ability to directly access the reinsurance Whilst numerous definitions of a “captive market, with all the attendant benefits that insurance company” abound, essentially it is an go with it. ‘in-house’ insurance or reinsurance company, Adrian Sykes To be (or not to be) a captive owner formed primarily to insure its owner and affiliated is a global fronting companies. It is a risk management and financing A long term view underwriter with AIG vehicle that offers an alternative to conventional Every organisation has its own specific approach Multinational in the insurance as it enables the parent/affiliates to to assuming risk, but often those companies that EMEA region. Adrian essentially ’selfinsure’ or ‘retain the risk’ through want to maintain a large degree of control with joined AIG in 2006 its captive. The captive provides the owner or regard to their group risk and insurance spend in Bermuda, before its affiliates with insurance coverage for risks seek to form a captive. The most successful captives transferring to AIG’s that the owner wishes to retain, and the insured are those where the parent views the captive as London office five years entities pay premium to the captive.
    [Show full text]
  • Pub. KS-1510 Sales Tax and Compensating Use Tax Booklet Rev
    Sales Tax and Compensating Use Tax NOTE: Underlying law may have changed. See Revenue Notice 19-04 concerning nexus. Welcome to the Kansas business community! This publication has been prepared by the Kansas Department of Revenue (KDOR) to assist you in understanding how the Kansas sales and use tax applies to your business operation. Inside you will find information on what is taxable, what is exempt, how to collect, report, and pay your sales and use tax electronically, and other information of general interest to businesses. Our goal is to make collecting and paying these taxes as easy as possible and to help you avoid costly sales or use tax deficiencies. By law, businesses are now required to submit their Sales, Compensating Use and Withholding Tax returns electronically. Kansas offers several electronic file and pay solutions – see page 16. For the most up-to-date electronic information, visit our website. ksrevenue.org Pub KS-1510 (Rev. 12-20) TABLE OF CONTENTS KANSAS SALES TAX ........................................ 3 KANSAS CUSTOMER SERVICE CENTER ...... 16 Local Sales Tax File, Pay and Make Updates Electronically Distribution of Revenue What Can I Do Electronically Sales Tax and Your Business Requirement to File and Pay Pay By Credit Card SALES THAT ARE TAXABLE ........................... 3 Wire Transfers Retail Sale, Rental or Lease of Tangible Personal Property RETAILERS SALES TAX ................................... 17 Taxable Services Completing the ST-16 Form Type Admissions Sample Completed Sales Tax Filings SALES TAX EXEMPTIONS ............................... 6 COMPENSATING USE TAX .............................. 20 Exempt Buyers Consumers’ Compensating Use Tax Buyers Who are Not Exempt Reporting and Paying Consumers’ Items Exempt from Sales Tax Compensating Use Tax Uses That Are Exempt Sample Completed CT-10U filing Other Special Situations Retailers’ Compensating Use Tax Reciprocal Discounts KANSAS EXEMPTION CERTIFICATES..........
    [Show full text]
  • Bahamas Hopes to 'Recapture' Captive Insurance Business Published on August 14, 2013
    Bahamas hopes to 'recapture' captive insurance business Published on August 14, 2013 By Alison Lowe Nassau Guardian Business Editor NASSAU, Bahamas -- Predicting that a new captive insurance management company will set up shop in The Bahamas “within months”, the minister of financial services has advanced competitiveness- building legislative amendments that will allow the country to “re-establish” and grow its captive insurance sector. Addressing Parliament on Monday, Ryan Pinder said that technical amendments to the International Business Companies (Amendment) Bill and the Segregated Accounts Companies (Amendment) Bill would make The Bahamas “that much more competitive, and that much better” when it comes to attracting captive insurance business to this nation. The amendments are being moved forward in light of “conversations with the private sector and the BFSB,” Pinder told Guardian Business. While the amendments do not address the capacity for Bahamian companies to set up domestic captives, creating the legislative framework Minister of Financial for this to take place is a matter the government is “pursuing right now,” Services, Ryan Pinder the minister added. Pinder told Parliament the amendments are particularly timely given recent interest from captive insurance management companies who are exploring whether to establish a presence in The Bahamas. “In the last three weeks, I have had correspondence with senior executives of two of the most significant captive insurance ma nagers, if not in the region, then in the world, who have travelled to The Bahamas to speak with us about advancing and putting together our strategy for captive insurance. In that regard I also have lunch this week to attract more captive insurance management companies from the Cayman Islands,” Pinder told Parliament.
    [Show full text]