DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Caribbean Coral Proposed Critical Habitat Information Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Caribbean Coral Proposed Critical Habitat Information Report Endangered Species Act Critical Habitat Report Draft Information Basis and Impact Considerations of Critical Habitat Designations for Threatened Caribbean Corals September 2020 CONTENTS 1. Introduction 4 2. Background 5 2.1. Listing History ................................................................................................................................ 5 2.2. Natural History .............................................................................................................................. 5 3. Critical Habitat Identification and Designation 10 4. Geographical Areas Occupied by the Species 11 5. Physical or Biological Features Essential for Conservation 12 6. Specific Areas Within the Geographical Areas Occupied by the Species 23 7. Unoccupied Areas 27 8. Special Management Considerations 28 9. Application of ESA Section 4(a)(3)(B)(i) 29 10. Application of ESA Section 4(b)(2) 31 10.1. Economic Impacts ....................................................................................................................... 32 10.1.1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 34 10.1.2. Framework of the economic analysis ................................................................................. 35 10.1.3. Activities that may be affected ........................................................................................... 44 10.1.4. Projection of Future Section 7 Consultations ..................................................................... 64 10.1.5. Potential Project Modifications .......................................................................................... 70 10.1.6. Estimated Incremental costs ............................................................................................... 80 10.1.7. Economic Impacts Summary ............................................................................................... 97 10.2. National Security Impacts ........................................................................................................... 98 10.3. Other Relevant Impacts .............................................................................................................. 98 10.3.1. Conservation Benefits ......................................................................................................... 99 10.3.2. Impacts to Governmental and Private Entities ................................................................. 107 Appendix A. Incremental Cost Sensitivity Results A-1 Appendix B. Impacts on Small Businesses B-1 Summary of Findings .............................................................................................................................. B-1 Initial Regulatory Flexibility Analysis (IRFA) ........................................................................................... B-3 Why Action by the Agency is Being Considered ................................................................................ B-4 Objectives of and Legal Basis for the Proposed Rule ......................................................................... B-4 Description and Estimate of the Number of Small Entities to Which the Proposed Rule Will Apply B-4 Description of Reporting and Recordkeeping Efforts ........................................................................ B-8 Identification of Relevant Federal Rules that may Duplicate, Overlap, or Conflict with the Proposed Rule 8 Description of Alternatives to the Proposed Rule Which Accomplish the Objectives and Which Minimize Impacts on Small Entities ................................................................................................... B-8 References Ref-1 3 Caribbean Coral Critical Habitat Information Report LIST OF TABLES Table 1. DISTRIBUTIONS OF THREATENED CARIBBEAN CORAL SPECIES IN US JURISDICTIONS. Depth ranges reflect the typical depth distribution of each species. ...................................................................... 9 Table 2. EXAMPLES OF WATER CONDITIONS THAT SUPPORT CORAL REEFS. ............................................ 20 Table 3. UNITS OF CRITICAL HABITAT FOR EACH OF THE 5 THREATENED CARIBBEAN CORALS................ 25 Table 4. NMFS SOUTHEAST REGION CONSULTATIONS FOR ACTIVITIES THAT MAY AFFECT PROPOSED 5 corals CRITICAL HABITAT AREAS, BY ACTIVITY TYPE AND ACTION AGENCY (2004 – 2014) ........................ 45 Table 5. CONSTRUCTION CONSULTATIONS IN PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT AREAS FOR THE 5 corals BY SUBCATEGORY (2004 – 2014) ..................................................................................................................... 50 Table 6. FREQUENCY OF DREDGING IN FEDERALLY MAINTAINED HARBORS ............................................. 51 Table 7. FREQUENCY OF BEACH NOURISHMENT PROJECTS ON THE EAST COAST OF FLORIDA ................ 53 Table 8. FREQUENCY OF DREDGING FOR FEDERAL SHORELINE PROTECTION PROJECTS ON THE EAST COAST OF FLORIDA ..................................................................................................................................... 54 Table 9. FEDERAL PROTECTED AREAS WITHIN THE PROPOSED CRITICAL HABITAT ................................... 57 Table 10. ANNUAL LANDINGS AND VALUE OF THE SPINY LOBSTER FISHERY ............................................. 60 Table 11. ANNUAL LANDINGS AND VALUE OF THE CARIBBEAN REEF FISH FISHERY .................................. 60 Table 12. PROJECTED QUANTITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF INCREMENTAL PROGRAMMATIC SECTION 7 CONSULTATIONS (2016-2025) .................................................................................................................... 67 Table 13. PROJECTED QUANTITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF INCREMENTAL FORMAL SECTION 7 CONSULTATIONS (2016 – 2025) .................................................................................................................. 68 Table 14. PROJECTED QUANTITY AND DISTRIBUTION OF INFORMAL SECTION 7 CONSULTATIONS (2016- 2025) ........................................................................................................................................................... 70 Table 15. SUMMARY OF POTENTIAL PROJECT MODIFICATIONS ................................................................ 73 Table 16. COST OF POTENTIALLY INCREMENTAL PROJECT MODIFICATIONS ............................................. 79 Table 17. INCREMENTAL COSTS PER CONSULTATION RESULTING FROM THE ADDITIONAL ADMINISTRATIVE EFFORT TO ADDRESS ADVERSE MODIFICATION FOR ACTIVITIES IN 5 corals CRITICAL HABITAT (2015$) ......................................................................................................................................... 81 Table 18. INCREMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, BY UNIT 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% DISCOUNT RATE) .... 83 Table 19. INCREMENTAL ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS, BY ACTIVITY TYPE 2016-2025 ($2015) ....................... 83 Table 20. FORECAST SECTION 7 CONSULTATIONS BY ACTIVITY THAT WOULD NOT AFFECT ACROPORA CRITICAL HABITAT (2016 – 2025)1-4, 6 .......................................................................................................... 84 Table 21. INCREMENTAL PROJECT MODIFICATIONS BY ACTIVITY .............................................................. 86 Table 22. High-end Incremental Project Modification Costs, By Unit, 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% Discount Rate) ............................................................................................................................................................ 87 Table 23. HIGH-END INCREMENTAL PROJECT MODIFICATION COSTS, BY ACTIVITY TYPE, 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% DISCOUNT RATE) ...................................................................................................................... 88 i Caribbean Coral Critical Habitat Information Report Table 24. LOW-END TOTAL INCREMENTAL COSTS (ADMINISTRATIVE)), BY UNIT, 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% DISCOUNT RATE) ......................................................................................................................................... 90 Table 25. HIGH-END TOTAL INCREMENTAL COSTS (ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROJECT MODIFICATION), BY UNIT, 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% DISCOUNT RATE) .......................................................................................... 90 Table 26. LOW-END TOTAL INCREMENTAL COSTS (ADMINISTRATIVE), BY ACTIVITY TYPE, 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% DISCOUNT RATE) ...................................................................................................................... 91 Table 27. HIGH-END TOTAL INCREMENTAL COSTS (ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROJECT MODIFICATION), BY ACTIVITY TYPE, 2016-2025 ($2015, 7% DISCOUNT RATE) .......................................................................... 92 Table 28. SUMMARY OF UNCERTAINTIES ................................................................................................... 94 Table 29. RELEVANT ECONOMIC VALUE ESTIMATES FOR CORAL REEFS (AS REPORTED IN NOAA CORAL REEF CONSERVATION PROGRAM, 2013) .................................................................................................. 105 U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | National Marine Fisheries Service LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. CALCULATING PRESENT VALUE .................................................................................................... 43 Figure 2. OVERLAP WITH ELKHORN AND STAGHORN CRITICAL HABITAT IN THE CARIBBEAN. (Note: “Five Corals” in legends in this and following figure is an error in outside source maps
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Current Practices in the Identification of Critical Habitat for Threatened Species
    Current practices in the identification of critical habitat for threatened species Abbey E Camaclang1*, Martine Maron2, Tara G Martin3, and Hugh P Possingham1,4,5 Author Addresses 1The University of Queensland, School of Biological Sciences, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 2The University of Queensland, School of Geography, Planning, and Environmental Management, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 3CSIRO Land and Water, 41 Boggo Road, Dutton Park, QLD 4102, Austrralia 4The University of Queensland, School of Mathematics and Physics, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia 5Imperial College London, Department of Life Sciences, Silwood Park, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berkshire, UK *email [email protected] Abstract The term critical habitat is used to describe the subset of habitat that is essential to the survival and recovery of species. Some countries legally require that critical habitat of listed threatened and endangered species be identified and protected. However, there is little evidence to suggest that the identification of critical habitat has had much impact on species recovery. We hypothesized that this may be due at least partly to a mismatch between the intent of critical habitat identification, which is to protect sufficient habitat for species persistence and recovery, and its practice. We used content analysis to systematically review critical habitat documents from the United States, Canada, and Australia. In particular, we identified the major trends in type of information used to identify critical habitat and in occupancy of habitat identified as critical. Information about population viability was used to identify critical habitat for only 1% of the species reviewed, and for most species, designated critical habitat did not include unoccupied habitat.
    [Show full text]
  • The Disastrous Impacts of Trump's Border Wall on Wildlife
    a Wall in the Wild The Disastrous Impacts of Trump’s Border Wall on Wildlife Noah Greenwald, Brian Segee, Tierra Curry and Curt Bradley Center for Biological Diversity, May 2017 Saving Life on Earth Executive Summary rump’s border wall will be a deathblow to already endangered animals on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. This report examines the impacts of construction of that wall on threatened and endangered species along the entirety of the nearly 2,000 miles of the border between the United States and Mexico. TThe wall and concurrent border-enforcement activities are a serious human-rights disaster, but the wall will also have severe impacts on wildlife and the environment, leading to direct and indirect habitat destruction. A wall will block movement of many wildlife species, precluding genetic exchange, population rescue and movement of species in response to climate change. This may very well lead to the extinction of the jaguar, ocelot, cactus ferruginous pygmy owl and other species in the United States. To assess the impacts of the wall on imperiled species, we identified all species protected as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act, or under consideration for such protection by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (“candidates”), that have ranges near or crossing the border. We also determined whether any of these species have designated “critical habitat” on the border in the United States. Finally, we reviewed available literature on the impacts of the existing border wall. We found that the border wall will have disastrous impacts on our most vulnerable wildlife, including: 93 threatened, endangered and candidate species would potentially be affected by construction of a wall and related infrastructure spanning the entirety of the border, including jaguars, Mexican gray wolves and Quino checkerspot butterflies.
    [Show full text]
  • Taxonomic Checklist of CITES Listed Coral Species Part II
    CoP16 Doc. 43.1 (Rev. 1) Annex 5.2 (English only / Únicamente en inglés / Seulement en anglais) Taxonomic Checklist of CITES listed Coral Species Part II CORAL SPECIES AND SYNONYMS CURRENTLY RECOGNIZED IN THE UNEP‐WCMC DATABASE 1. Scleractinia families Family Name Accepted Name Species Author Nomenclature Reference Synonyms ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrolhosensis Veron, 1985 Veron (2000) Madrepora crassa Milne Edwards & Haime, 1860; ACROPORIDAE Acropora abrotanoides (Lamarck, 1816) Veron (2000) Madrepora abrotanoides Lamarck, 1816; Acropora mangarevensis Vaughan, 1906 ACROPORIDAE Acropora aculeus (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora aculeus Dana, 1846 Madrepora acuminata Verrill, 1864; Madrepora diffusa ACROPORIDAE Acropora acuminata (Verrill, 1864) Veron (2000) Verrill, 1864; Acropora diffusa (Verrill, 1864); Madrepora nigra Brook, 1892 ACROPORIDAE Acropora akajimensis Veron, 1990 Veron (2000) Madrepora coronata Brook, 1892; Madrepora ACROPORIDAE Acropora anthocercis (Brook, 1893) Veron (2000) anthocercis Brook, 1893 ACROPORIDAE Acropora arabensis Hodgson & Carpenter, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora aspera Dana, 1846; Acropora cribripora (Dana, 1846); Madrepora cribripora Dana, 1846; Acropora manni (Quelch, 1886); Madrepora manni ACROPORIDAE Acropora aspera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Quelch, 1886; Acropora hebes (Dana, 1846); Madrepora hebes Dana, 1846; Acropora yaeyamaensis Eguchi & Shirai, 1977 ACROPORIDAE Acropora austera (Dana, 1846) Veron (2000) Madrepora austera Dana, 1846 ACROPORIDAE Acropora awi Wallace & Wolstenholme, 1998 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora azurea Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora batunai Wallace, 1997 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bifurcata Nemenzo, 1971 Veron (2000) ACROPORIDAE Acropora branchi Riegl, 1995 Veron (2000) Madrepora brueggemanni Brook, 1891; Isopora ACROPORIDAE Acropora brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) Veron (2000) brueggemanni (Brook, 1891) ACROPORIDAE Acropora bushyensis Veron & Wallace, 1984 Veron (2000) Acropora fasciculare Latypov, 1992 ACROPORIDAE Acropora cardenae Wells, 1985 Veron (2000) CoP16 Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • Exposure to Elevated Sea-Surface Temperatures Below the Bleaching Threshold Impairs Coral Recovery and Regeneration Following Injury
    A peer-reviewed version of this preprint was published in PeerJ on 18 August 2017. View the peer-reviewed version (peerj.com/articles/3719), which is the preferred citable publication unless you specifically need to cite this preprint. Bonesso JL, Leggat W, Ainsworth TD. 2017. Exposure to elevated sea-surface temperatures below the bleaching threshold impairs coral recovery and regeneration following injury. PeerJ 5:e3719 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.3719 Exposure to elevated sea-surface temperatures below the bleaching threshold impairs coral recovery and regeneration following injury Joshua Louis Bonesso Corresp., 1 , William Leggat 1, 2 , Tracy Danielle Ainsworth 2 1 College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia 2 Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia Corresponding Author: Joshua Louis Bonesso Email address: [email protected] Elevated sea surface temperatures (SSTs) are linked to an increase in the frequency and severity of bleaching events due to temperatures exceeding corals’ upper thermal limits. The temperatures at which a breakdown of the coral-Symbiodinium endosymbiosis (coral bleaching) occurs are referred to as the upper thermal limits for the coral species. This breakdown of the endosymbiosis results in a reduction of corals’ nutritional uptake, growth, and tissue integrity. Periods of elevated sea surface temperature, thermal stress and coral bleaching are also linked to increased disease susceptibility and an increased frequency of storms which cause injury and physical damage to corals. Herein we aimed to determine the capacity of corals to regenerate and recover from injuries (removal of apical tips) sustained during periods of elevated sea surface temperatures which result in coral stress responses, but which do not result in coral bleaching (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Intra-Colonial Diversity in the Scleractinian Coral
    Intra-colonial diversity in the scleractinian coral, Acropora millepora: identifying the nutritional gradients underlying physiological integration and compartmentalised functioning Jessica A. Conlan1, Craig A. Humphrey2, Andrea Severati2 and David S. Francis1 1 School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Warrnambool, Victoria, Australia 2 The National Sea Simulator, Australian Institute of Marine Science, Townsville, Queensland, Australia ABSTRACT Scleractinian corals are colonial organisms comprising multiple physiologically integrated polyps and branches. Colonialism in corals is highly beneficial, and allows a single colony to undergo several life processes at once through physiological integra- tion and compartmentalised functioning. Elucidating differences in the biochemical composition of intra-colonial branch positions will provide valuable insight into the nutritional reserves underlying different regions in individual coral colonies. This will also ascertain prudent harvesting strategies of wild donor-colonies to generate coral stock with high survival and vigour prospects for reef-rehabilitation efforts and captive husbandry. This study examined the effects of colony branch position on the nutritional profile of two different colony sizes of the common scleractinian, Acropora millepora. For smaller colonies, branches were sampled at three locations: the colony centre (S-centre), 50% of the longitudinal radius length (LRL) (S-50), and the colony edge (S-edge). For larger colonies, four locations were sampled: the colony centre (L-centre), 33.3% of the LRL (L-33), 66.6% of the LRL (L-66), and the edge (L-edge). Results Submitted 21 September 2017 demonstrate significant branch position effects, with the edge regions containing higher Accepted 16 December 2017 protein, likely due to increased tissue synthesis and calcification.
    [Show full text]
  • Pax Gene Diversity in the Basal Cnidarian Acropora Millepora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa): Implications for the Evolution of the Pax Gene Family
    Pax gene diversity in the basal cnidarian Acropora millepora (Cnidaria, Anthozoa): Implications for the evolution of the Pax gene family David J. Miller*†, David C. Hayward‡, John S. Reece-Hoyes*‡, Ingo Scholten*, Julian Catmull*‡, Walter J. Gehring§, Patrick Callaerts§¶, Jill E. Larsen*, and Eldon E. Ball‡ *Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland 4811, Australia; ‡Research School of Biological Sciences, Australian National University, P.O. Box 475, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia; §Biozentrum, University of Basel, Klingelbergstrasse 70, CH-4056 Basel, Switzerland; and ¶Department of Biology, University of Houston, Houston, TX 77204-5513 Contributed by Walter J. Gehring, January 31, 2000 Pax genes encode a family of transcription factors, many of which Many Pax proteins contain motifs in addition to the PD; most play key roles in animal embryonic development but whose evo- of the arthropod and chordate Pax genes fall into four classes on lutionary relationships and ancestral functions are unclear. To the basis of comparisons of domain structure and sequences address these issues, we are characterizing the Pax gene comple- (9–12). The Pax-6 class, which includes Drosophila eyeless, is the ment of the coral Acropora millepora, an anthozoan cnidarian. As only unequivocal case of conservation of function (reviewed in the simplest animals at the tissue level of organization, cnidarians ref. 13). The Pax-2͞5͞8 class is viewed as that most closely occupy a key position in animal evolution, and the Anthozoa are related to the Pax-6 group—the ‘‘supergroup’’ comprising Pax- the basal class within this diverse phylum. We have identified four 6͞2͞5͞8 is clearly distinct from the other supergroup, which Pax genes in Acropora: two (Pax-Aam and Pax-Bam) are orthologs comprises the Pax-3͞7 and Pax-1͞9 clades (11).
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Algae
    Coral Reef Algae Peggy Fong and Valerie J. Paul Abstract Benthic macroalgae, or “seaweeds,” are key mem- 1 Importance of Coral Reef Algae bers of coral reef communities that provide vital ecological functions such as stabilization of reef structure, production Coral reefs are one of the most diverse and productive eco- of tropical sands, nutrient retention and recycling, primary systems on the planet, forming heterogeneous habitats that production, and trophic support. Macroalgae of an astonish- serve as important sources of primary production within ing range of diversity, abundance, and morphological form provide these equally diverse ecological functions. Marine tropical marine environments (Odum and Odum 1955; macroalgae are a functional rather than phylogenetic group Connell 1978). Coral reefs are located along the coastlines of comprised of members from two Kingdoms and at least over 100 countries and provide a variety of ecosystem goods four major Phyla. Structurally, coral reef macroalgae range and services. Reefs serve as a major food source for many from simple chains of prokaryotic cells to upright vine-like developing nations, provide barriers to high wave action that rockweeds with complex internal structures analogous to buffer coastlines and beaches from erosion, and supply an vascular plants. There is abundant evidence that the his- important revenue base for local economies through fishing torical state of coral reef algal communities was dominance and recreational activities (Odgen 1997). by encrusting and turf-forming macroalgae, yet over the Benthic algae are key members of coral reef communities last few decades upright and more fleshy macroalgae have (Fig. 1) that provide vital ecological functions such as stabili- proliferated across all areas and zones of reefs with increas- zation of reef structure, production of tropical sands, nutrient ing frequency and abundance.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Identification of Symbiotic Dinoflagellates in Pacific Corals in the Genus Pocillopora Hélène Magalon, Jean-François Flot, Emmanuelle Baudry
    Molecular identification of symbiotic dinoflagellates in Pacific corals in the genus Pocillopora Hélène Magalon, Jean-François Flot, Emmanuelle Baudry To cite this version: Hélène Magalon, Jean-François Flot, Emmanuelle Baudry. Molecular identification of symbiotic di- noflagellates in Pacific corals in the genus Pocillopora. Coral Reefs, Springer Verlag, 2007, 26(3), pp.551-558. hal-00941744 HAL Id: hal-00941744 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00941744 Submitted on 6 May 2016 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Molecular identiWcation of symbiotic dinoXagellates in PaciWc corals in the genus Pocillopora H. Magalon · J.-F. Flot · E. Baudry Abstract This study focused on the association between Introduction corals of the genus Pocillopora, a major constituent of PaciWc reefs, and their zooxanthellae. Samples of Most tropical corals live in symbiosis with photosynthetic P. meandrina, P. verrucosa, P. damicornis, P. eydouxi, algae, the zooxanthellae (reviewed in Trench 1993). Most P. ligulata and P. molokensis were collected from French zooxanthellae belong to the genus Symbiodinium and 11 Polynesia, Tonga, Okinawa and Hawaii. Symbiodinium species have now been deWned based on morphological, diversity was explored by looking at the 28S and ITS1 physiological and molecular criteria (reviewed in Baker regions of the ribosomal DNA.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Corals Supplemental Information Report
    Supplemental Information Report on Status Review Report And Draft Management Report For 82 Coral Candidate Species November 2012 Southeast and Pacific Islands Regional Offices National Marine Fisheries Service National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Department of Commerce Table of Contents INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................................. 1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 1 Methods .................................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 2 MISCELLANEOUS COMMENTS RECEIVED ...................................................................................................... 3 SRR EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 4 1. Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 2. General Background on Corals and Coral Reefs .................................................................................... 4 2.1 Taxonomy & Distribution .............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Antillean Manatee Trichechus Manatus Manatus Belize
    Antillean Manatee Trichechus manatus manatus Belize Compiler: Jamal Galves Contributors: Jamal Galves, Joel Verde, Celia Mahung Suggested citation: Galves, J, Belize National Manatee Working Group and Verde, J. A. 2020. A Survival Blueprint for the Antillean Mantees Trichechus manatus manatus of Belize. Results from the EDGE PhotoArk NatGeo Fellowship Project: Efforts to Safeguard the Antillean Manatees of Belize. EDGE of Existence Programme, Zoological Society of London. 1. STATUS REVIEW 1.1 Taxonomy: The West Indian manatee (Trichechus manatus), is from the order of the sirenian of the Trichechidae family and is divided into two subspecies: the Florida manatee T. m. latirostris; and the Antillean manatee T. m. manatus (Hatt, 1934). Antillean Manatee Florida Manatee Kingdom: Animalia Kingdom: Animalia Order: Sirenia Order: Sirenia Phylum: Chordata Phylum: Chordata Family: Trichechidae Family: Trichechidae Class: Mammalia Class: Mammalia Genus: Trichechus Genus: Trichechus Species: Trichechus manatus manatus Species: Trichechus manatus ssp. latirostris 1.2 Distribution and population status: Figure 1. Map of Antillean and Florida manatee distribution. Dark grey area shows the distribution of Antillean manatee Trichechus manatus manatus. The distribution of the Florida manatee is displayed in diagonal lines, and the known subpopulations of Antillean manatee with the species genetic barriers is demarcated with dotted lines, according to Vianna et al., 2006. Map used from Castelblanco-Martínez et al 2012. The Antillean Manatee has a fragmented distribution that ranges from the southeast of Texas to as far as the northeast of Brazil, including the Greater Antilles (Lefebvre et al., 2001; Reynolds and Powell, 2002). This species can be found in coastal marine, brackish and freshwater systems, and is capable to alternate between these three environments (Lefebvre, 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Population Genetics of the Coral Acropora Millepora: Towards a Genomic Predictor of Bleaching
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/867754; this version posted December 6, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Population genetics of the coral Acropora millepora: Towards a genomic predictor of bleaching Zachary L. Fuller∗1, Veronique J.L. Mocellin2, Luke Morris2, Neal Cantin2, Jihanne Shepherd1, Luke Sarre1, Julie Peng3, Yi Liao4,5, Joseph Pickrell6, Peter Andolfatto1, Mikhail Matzy4, Line K. Bayy2, and Molly Przeworskiy1,2,3 1Department of Biological Sciences, Columbia University 2Australia Institute of Marine Science 3Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University 4Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin 5Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Irvine 6Gencove, Inc. New York 7Department of Systems Biology, Columbia University 8Program for Mathematical Genomics, Columbia University 6 December 2019 Abstract Although reef-building corals are rapidly declining worldwide, responses to bleaching vary both within and among species. Because these inter-individual differences are partly her- itable, they should in principle be predictable from genomic data. Towards that goal, we generated a chromosome-scale genome assembly for the coral Acropora millepora. We then obtained whole genome sequences for 237 phenotyped samples collected at 12 reefs distributed along the Great Barrier Reef, among which we inferred very little population structure. Scanning the genome for evidence of local adaptation, we detected signatures of long-term balancing selection in the heat-shock co-chaperone sacsin. We further used 213 of the samples to conduct a genome-wide association study of visual bleaching score, in- corporating the polygenic score derived from it into a predictive model for bleaching in the wild.
    [Show full text]
  • Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans
    biology Review Cnidarian Immunity and the Repertoire of Defense Mechanisms in Anthozoans Maria Giovanna Parisi 1,* , Daniela Parrinello 1, Loredana Stabili 2 and Matteo Cammarata 1,* 1 Department of Earth and Marine Sciences, University of Palermo, 90128 Palermo, Italy; [email protected] 2 Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.G.P.); [email protected] (M.C.) Received: 10 August 2020; Accepted: 4 September 2020; Published: 11 September 2020 Abstract: Anthozoa is the most specious class of the phylum Cnidaria that is phylogenetically basal within the Metazoa. It is an interesting group for studying the evolution of mutualisms and immunity, for despite their morphological simplicity, Anthozoans are unexpectedly immunologically complex, with large genomes and gene families similar to those of the Bilateria. Evidence indicates that the Anthozoan innate immune system is not only involved in the disruption of harmful microorganisms, but is also crucial in structuring tissue-associated microbial communities that are essential components of the cnidarian holobiont and useful to the animal’s health for several functions including metabolism, immune defense, development, and behavior. Here, we report on the current state of the art of Anthozoan immunity. Like other invertebrates, Anthozoans possess immune mechanisms based on self/non-self-recognition. Although lacking adaptive immunity, they use a diverse repertoire of immune receptor signaling pathways (PRRs) to recognize a broad array of conserved microorganism-associated molecular patterns (MAMP). The intracellular signaling cascades lead to gene transcription up to endpoints of release of molecules that kill the pathogens, defend the self by maintaining homeostasis, and modulate the wound repair process.
    [Show full text]