Gene Ontology and Pathways

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Gene Ontology and Pathways Gene ontology and pathways Ståle Nygård [email protected] Bioinformatics Core Facility, Oslo University Hospital/University of Oslo So: here you are Gene lists • Long list of differentially expressed genes • Possibly hundreds of papers describing the functions of the genes • Misleading names • Different names in different organisms Genes seldomly operate on it's own -Genes are by nature not independent. Biologically related genes will often show expression changes together -Trends supported by several genes in a group gives more power to statistical tests vs a test for an individual gene -Need predefined groups of biologically related genes to help process our list for systematic changes. Ontologies • Gene Ontology (GO) • Sequence Ontology (SO) (sequence features) • Phenotype and Trait Ontology (PATO) • Taxon (NCBI) • Anatomy (Penn) • Disease (ICD9) • Developmental stage (multiple sources) Gene Ontology (GO) • Why Gene Ontology? – Produce a controlled vocabulary describing aspects of molecular biology, that can be applied to all organisms. – Facilitate communication between people and organization. – Improve interoperability between systems. Goal of GO Consortium (http://www.geneontology.org/) • Produce a controlled vocabulary describing aspects of molecular biology, that could be applied to all organism. • Describe gene products using vocabulary terms (annotation). • Develop tools: – to query and modify the vocabularies and annotations How does GO work? What information might we want to capture about a gene product? • What does the gene product do? • Why does it perform these activities? • Where does it act? The Gene Ontology (GO) – Molecular function: • Gene product at biochemical level. – Biological process: • Cellular events to which the gene product contributes. – Cellular component: • Location or complex of gene/protein. Molecular Function • activities or “jobs” of a gene product Insulin binding Insulin transport activity Biological Process • a commonly recognized series of events cell division Cellular Component • where a gene product acts Content of GO Molecular Function 8,731 terms Biological Process 19,022 terms Cellular Component 2,737 terms Total 30,490 terms Obsolete terms: 1434 As of May 2010 GO Annotation • Association between gene product and applicable GO terms • Provided by member databases. Collaborating databases annotate their gene products (or genes) with GO terms, providing references and indicating what kind of evidence is available to support the annotations. • Made by manual or automated methods. • GO Annotation • Database object: gene or gene product • GO term ID • Evidence supporting annotation • Reference – publication or computational method Overrepresentation of GO terms • We have a subset of genes – List of differentially expressed genes – List of genes that cluster together • Which biological processes do these genes take part in? • Is there an over-representation of the number of genes belonging to a particular biological process, compared to what could be expected? Gene Ontology Tools • eGON (from NTNU, www.genetools.no) • GSEA • DAVID • EASE • TopGO • GOstat • + many more Question: which cellular biological processes occur? 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 hours human fibroblasts - 24 h time course thymidine-block release Questions what is the function of up-regulated genes? 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 hours what is the function of down-regulated genes? human fibroblasts - 24 h time course thymidine-block release 173 genes up-regulated 0-4 hours compared to all genes on the array Ordered by significance: 146 genes down-regulated 0-4 hours compared to all genes on the array homeostasis cell adhesion lipid transport chemotaxis amino acid metabolism lipid metabolism response to stress 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 hours cell signaling S-phase ion transport apoptosis cell cycle arrest apoptosis human fibroblasts - 24 h time course thymidine-block release Biological pathways Type of pathways • Metabolic pathways – convert raw materials from the environment into value-added products and recycle or dispose of intracellular materials • Signaling pathways – convert mechanical/chemical stimulus to a cell into a specific cellular response • Regulatory pathways – alter the output of the genetic program through transcriptional and translational regulation • Signaling, regulatory and Signaling metabolic events are often linked Regulatory Metabolic Types of pathway representations • Cartoons – Textbooks – Biocarta • Circuit diagrams – KEGG – Reactome – geneRifs • Computational networks – SBML models – Transcription factor networks KEGG • A large collection of signaling, metabolic and regulatory pathways • Organised by separate pathways with hand drawn diagrams • Academic (freely available) • The pathways can be used to look for overrepresentation or enrichment • Can be used to visually check for path- ness or direction TGF Beta signalling patway Same pathway in Biocarta GO vs. Pathways • Overview • Detail view • Can handle a large • Focused sets of number of genes genes • Many genes • Scattered data annotated sources • Every gene • Focuses on considered on its own interactions between genes Network construction • Information about established pathways (e.g. in KEGG) is (not at all) complete • Pathways interact and depend on context • An alternative approach to using established pathways is to construct networks from the data. Network construction • Networks can be inferred inferred from – correlation in the data (recall gene clustering) and/or – interaction databases: • Protein-protein interactions: BioGRID, IntACT, DIP,HPRD ++ • Transcription factor data bases: TRANSFAC, JASPAR ++ • Literature: PubGENE Network construction: case study WT AB CXCR5 KO AB Mice with the chemokine CXCR5 receptor knocked out develop dialated hypertrophy after banding of the aorta. Microarray study WT SHAM KO SHAM WT AB KO AB (n=3) (n=3) (n=4) (n=4) Aim of study: Find the molecular mecanism behind the altered phenotype of the heart. Network construction using prior knowledge This method constructs a network of interacting genes based on literature reported interactions, protein-protein interactions and correlations in the data. ResultsResults FMOD - fibromodulin …may regulate TGF-beta activities by sequestering TGF- beta into the extracellular matrix CXCL13 B lymphocyte Thbs1- thrombospondin 1 Fn1-Fibronectin 1 chemoattractant Adhesive glycoprotein that Extracellular matrix mediates cell-to-cell and glycoprotein that cell-to-matrix interactions. Tgfb2 - transforming binds to membrane growth factor, beta 2 -spanning Extracellular receptor proteins glycosylated protein. called integrins. Spp1- secreted phosphoprotein 1 Cytokine. Probably Thbs4- important to cell- thrombospondin matrix interaction 4 Lox – lysil oxidase Col14a1- Extracellular copper Collagen, type XIV, enzyme that initiates alpha 1 the crosslinking of collagens and elastin. KO AB vs KO SHAM The method finds a cluster of differentially expressed extracellular matrix locallized genes Conclusion • GO is the world map of molecular biology • Pathways provide more detailed information • Network construction using interaction databases can reveal information beyond classical pathways Questions? .
Recommended publications
  • The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)
    Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genome Minoru Kanehisa Institute for Chemical Research, Kyoto University HFSPO Workshop, Strasbourg, November 18, 2016 The KEGG Databases Category Database Content PATHWAY KEGG pathway maps Systems information BRITE BRITE functional hierarchies MODULE KEGG modules KO (KEGG ORTHOLOGY) KO groups for functional orthologs Genomic information GENOME KEGG organisms, viruses and addendum GENES / SSDB Genes and proteins / sequence similarity COMPOUND Chemical compounds GLYCAN Glycans Chemical information REACTION / RCLASS Reactions / reaction classes ENZYME Enzyme nomenclature DISEASE Human diseases DRUG / DGROUP Drugs / drug groups Health information ENVIRON Health-related substances (KEGG MEDICUS) JAPIC Japanese drug labels DailyMed FDA drug labels 12 manually curated original DBs 3 DBs taken from outside sources and given original annotations (GENOME, GENES, ENZYME) 1 computationally generated DB (SSDB) 2 outside DBs (JAPIC, DailyMed) KEGG is widely used for functional interpretation and practical application of genome sequences and other high-throughput data KO PATHWAY GENOME BRITE DISEASE GENES MODULE DRUG Genome Molecular High-level Practical Metagenome functions functions applications Transcriptome etc. Metabolome Glycome etc. COMPOUND GLYCAN REACTION Funding Annual budget Period Funding source (USD) 1995-2010 Supported by 10+ grants from Ministry of Education, >2 M Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS) and Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) 2011-2013 Supported by National Bioscience Database Center 0.8 M (NBDC) of JST 2014-2016 Supported by NBDC 0.5 M 2017- ? 1995 KEGG website made freely available 1997 KEGG FTP site made freely available 2011 Plea to support KEGG KEGG FTP academic subscription introduced 1998 First commercial licensing Contingency Plan 1999 Pathway Solutions Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Unicarbkb: Building a Standardised and Scalable Informatics Platform for Glycosciences Research
    Platforms EOI: UniCarbKB: Building a Standardised and Scalable Informatics Platform for Glycosciences Research 20 September 2019 at 13:02 Project title UniCarbKB: Building a Standardised and Scalable Informatics Platform for Glycosciences Research Field of Research code(s) 03 CHEMICAL SCIENCES 06 BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 08 INFORMATION AND COMPUTING SCIENCES 11 MEDICAL AND HEALTH SCIENCES EOI Lead Name Matthew Campbell EOI lead Research Group Institute for Glycomics EOI lead Organisation Institute for Glycomics, Griffith University EOI lead Email Collaborator details Name Research Group Organisation Malcolm Wolski eResearch Services Griffith University Project description Over the last few years the glycomics knowledge platform UniCarbKB has contributed to the growth of international glycoinformatics resources by providing access to data collections, web services and software applications supported by biocuration activities. However, UniCarbKB has continued to develop as a single monolithic resource. This proposed project will improve the growth and scalability of UniCarbKB by breaking down the platform into smaller and composable pieces. This will be achieved through the adoption of a more decentralised approach and a microservice architecture that will allow components of the platform to scale at different rates. This architecture will allow us is to build an extendable and cross-disciplinary resource by integrating existing data with new analysis tools. The adoption of international resources (e.g. NIH GlyGen), will allow not just mapping of glycan data to genes and proteins but also pathways, gene ontology, publications and a wide variety of data from EBI, NCBI and other sources. Additionally, we propose to integrate glycan array data and develop ontologies that can serve as tools for integration and subsequently analysis of glycan-associated Existing technology Adopt The proposed project will adopt a multi-tier application architecture in which applications will be developed and deployed as microservices.
    [Show full text]
  • Hierarchical Classification of Gene Ontology Terms Using the Gostruct
    Hierarchical classification of Gene Ontology terms using the GOstruct method Artem Sokolov and Asa Ben-Hur Department of Computer Science, Colorado State University Fort Collins, CO, 80523, USA Abstract Protein function prediction is an active area of research in bioinformatics. And yet, transfer of annotation on the basis of sequence or structural similarity remains widely used as an annotation method. Most of today's machine learning approaches reduce the problem to a collection of binary classification problems: whether a protein performs a particular function, sometimes with a post-processing step to combine the binary outputs. We propose a method that directly predicts a full functional annotation of a protein by modeling the structure of the Gene Ontology hierarchy in the framework of kernel methods for structured-output spaces. Our empirical results show improved performance over a BLAST nearest-neighbor method, and over algorithms that employ a collection of binary classifiers as measured on the Mousefunc benchmark dataset. 1 Introduction Protein function prediction is an active area of research in bioinformatics [25]; and yet, transfer of annotation on the basis of sequence or structural similarity remains the standard way of assigning function to proteins in newly sequenced organisms [20]. The Gene Ontology (GO), which is the current standard for annotating gene products and proteins, provides a large set of terms arranged in a hierarchical fashion that specify a gene-product's molecular function, the biological process it is involved in, and its localization to a cellular component [12]. GO term prediction is therefore a hierarchical classification problem, made more challenging by the thousands of annotation terms available.
    [Show full text]
  • Gene Ontology Analysis with Cytoscape
    Introduction to Systems Biology Exercise 6: Gene Ontology Analysis Overview: Gene Ontology (GO) is a useful resource in bioinformatics and systems biology. GO defines a controlled vocabulary of terms in biological process, molecular function, and cellular location, and relates the terms in a somewhat-organized fashion. This exercise outlines the resources available under Cytoscape to perform analyses for the enrichment of gene annotation (GO terms) in networks or sub-networks. In this exercise you will: • Learn how to navigate the Cytoscape Gene Ontology wizard to apply GO annotations to Cytoscape nodes • Learn how to look for enriched GO categories using the BiNGO plugin. What you will need: • The BiNGO plugin, developed by the Computational Biology Division, Dept. of Plant Systems Biology, Flanders Interuniversitary Institute for Biotechnology (VIB), described in Maere S, et al. Bioinformatics. 2005 Aug 15;21(16):3448-9. Epub 2005 Jun 21. • galFiltered.sif used in the earlier exercises and found under sampleData. Please download any missing files from http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/courses/27041/exercises/Ex3/ Download and install the BiNGO plugin, as follows: 1. Get BiNGO from the course page (see above) or go to the BiNGO page at http://www.psb.ugent.be/cbd/papers/BiNGO/. (This site also provides documentation on BiNGO). 2. Unzip the contents of BiNGO.zip to your Cytoscape plugins directory (make sure the BiNGO.jar file is in the plugins directory and not in a subdirectory). 3. If you are currently running Cytoscape, exit and restart. First, we will load the Gene Ontology data into Cytoscape. 1. Start Cytoscape, under Edit, Preferences, make sure your default species, “defaultSpeciesName”, is set to “Saccharomyces cerevisiae”.
    [Show full text]
  • Precise Generation of Systems Biology Models from KEGG Pathways Clemens Wrzodek*,Finjabuchel,¨ Manuel Ruff, Andreas Drager¨ and Andreas Zell
    Wrzodek et al. BMC Systems Biology 2013, 7:15 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1752-0509/7/15 METHODOLOGY ARTICLE OpenAccess Precise generation of systems biology models from KEGG pathways Clemens Wrzodek*,FinjaBuchel,¨ Manuel Ruff, Andreas Drager¨ and Andreas Zell Abstract Background: The KEGG PATHWAY database provides a plethora of pathways for a diversity of organisms. All pathway components are directly linked to other KEGG databases, such as KEGG COMPOUND or KEGG REACTION. Therefore, the pathways can be extended with an enormous amount of information and provide a foundation for initial structural modeling approaches. As a drawback, KGML-formatted KEGG pathways are primarily designed for visualization purposes and often omit important details for the sake of a clear arrangement of its entries. Thus, a direct conversion into systems biology models would produce incomplete and erroneous models. Results: Here, we present a precise method for processing and converting KEGG pathways into initial metabolic and signaling models encoded in the standardized community pathway formats SBML (Levels 2 and 3) and BioPAX (Levels 2 and 3). This method involves correcting invalid or incomplete KGML content, creating complete and valid stoichiometric reactions, translating relations to signaling models and augmenting the pathway content with various information, such as cross-references to Entrez Gene, OMIM, UniProt ChEBI, and many more. Finally, we compare several existing conversion tools for KEGG pathways and show that the conversion from KEGG to BioPAX does not involve a loss of information, whilst lossless translations to SBML can only be performed using SBML Level 3, including its recently proposed qualitative models and groups extension packages.
    [Show full text]
  • To Find Information About Arabidopsis Genes Leonore Reiser1, Shabari
    UNIT 1.11 Using The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) to Find Information About Arabidopsis Genes Leonore Reiser1, Shabari Subramaniam1, Donghui Li1, and Eva Huala1 1Phoenix Bioinformatics, Redwood City, CA USA ABSTRACT The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR; http://arabidopsis.org) is a comprehensive Web resource of Arabidopsis biology for plant scientists. TAIR curates and integrates information about genes, proteins, gene function, orthologs gene expression, mutant phenotypes, biological materials such as clones and seed stocks, genetic markers, genetic and physical maps, genome organization, images of mutant plants, protein sub-cellular localizations, publications, and the research community. The various data types are extensively interconnected and can be accessed through a variety of Web-based search and display tools. This unit primarily focuses on some basic methods for searching, browsing, visualizing, and analyzing information about Arabidopsis genes and genome, Additionally we describe how members of the community can share data using TAIR’s Online Annotation Submission Tool (TOAST), in order to make their published research more accessible and visible. Keywords: Arabidopsis ● databases ● bioinformatics ● data mining ● genomics INTRODUCTION The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR; http://arabidopsis.org) is a comprehensive Web resource for the biology of Arabidopsis thaliana (Huala et al., 2001; Garcia-Hernandez et al., 2002; Rhee et al., 2003; Weems et al., 2004; Swarbreck et al., 2008, Lamesch, et al., 2010, Berardini et al., 2016). The TAIR database contains information about genes, proteins, gene expression, mutant phenotypes, germplasms, clones, genetic markers, genetic and physical maps, genome organization, publications, and the research community. In addition, seed and DNA stocks from the Arabidopsis Biological Resource Center (ABRC; Scholl et al., 2003) are integrated with genomic data, and can be ordered through TAIR.
    [Show full text]
  • Use and Misuse of the Gene Ontology Annotations
    Nature Reviews Genetics | AOP, published online 13 May 2008; doi:10.1038/nrg2363 REVIEWS Use and misuse of the gene ontology annotations Seung Yon Rhee*, Valerie Wood‡, Kara Dolinski§ and Sorin Draghici|| Abstract | The Gene Ontology (GO) project is a collaboration among model organism databases to describe gene products from all organisms using a consistent and computable language. GO produces sets of explicitly defined, structured vocabularies that describe biological processes, molecular functions and cellular components of gene products in both a computer- and human-readable manner. Here we describe key aspects of GO, which, when overlooked, can cause erroneous results, and address how these pitfalls can be avoided. The accumulation of data produced by genome-scale FIG. 1b). These characteristics of the GO structure enable research requires explicitly defined vocabularies to powerful grouping, searching and analysis of genes. describe the biological attributes of genes in order to allow integration, retrieval and computation of the Fundamental aspects of GO annotations data1. Arguably, the most successful example of system- A GO annotation associates a gene with terms in the atic description of biology is the Gene Ontology (GO) ontologies and is generated either by a curator or project2. GO is widely used in biological databases, automatically through predictive methods. Genes are annotation projects and computational analyses (there associated with as many terms as appropriate as well as are 2,960 citations for GO in version 3.0 of the ISI Web of with the most specific terms available to reflect what is Knowledge) for annotating newly sequenced genomes3, currently known about a gene.
    [Show full text]
  • Wormbase Curation Interfaces and Tools
    Wormbase Curation Interfaces And Tools Xiaodong Wang, Paul Sternberg and the WormBase Consortium Division of Biology 156-29, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Abstract Cellular Component GO curation form Antibody OA Gene ontology OA Curating biological information from the published literature can be time- and labor-intensive especially without automated tools. WormBase1 has adopted several curation interfaces and tools, most of which were built in-house, to help curators recognize and extract data more efficiently from the literature. These tools range from simple computer interfaces for data entry to employing scripts that take advantage of complex text extraction algorithms, which automatically identify specific objects in a paper and presents them to the curator for curation. By using these in-house tools, we Go term are also able to tailor the tool to the individual needs and preferences of the curator. For example, C.elegans protein Cellular Gene Ontology Cellular Component and gene-gene interaction curators employ the text mining Component software Textpresso2 to indentify, retrieve, and extract relevant sentences from the full text of an Category terms article. The curators then use a web-based curation form to enter the data into our local database. Wormbase has developed our own Ontology Annotator tool based on the publicly available Phenote ontology annotation curation interface (developed by the Berkeley Bioinformatics Open-Source Ontology Annotator Projects (BBOP)), which we have adapted with datatype specific configurations. Currently, we have Autocomple4on field eight data s, including antibody, GO, gene regulation, interaction, molecule, people, phenotype and with ontology Transgene OA transgene are using or will use OA for routine literature curation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Biogrid Interaction Database
    D470–D478 Nucleic Acids Research, 2015, Vol. 43, Database issue Published online 26 November 2014 doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1204 The BioGRID interaction database: 2015 update Andrew Chatr-aryamontri1, Bobby-Joe Breitkreutz2, Rose Oughtred3, Lorrie Boucher2, Sven Heinicke3, Daici Chen1, Chris Stark2, Ashton Breitkreutz2, Nadine Kolas2, Lara O’Donnell2, Teresa Reguly2, Julie Nixon4, Lindsay Ramage4, Andrew Winter4, Adnane Sellam5, Christie Chang3, Jodi Hirschman3, Chandra Theesfeld3, Jennifer Rust3, Michael S. Livstone3, Kara Dolinski3 and Mike Tyers1,2,4,* 1Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer, Universite´ de Montreal,´ Montreal,´ Quebec H3C 3J7, Canada, 2The Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario M5G 1X5, Canada, 3Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA, 4School of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JR, UK and 5Centre Hospitalier de l’UniversiteLaval´ (CHUL), Quebec,´ Quebec´ G1V 4G2, Canada Received September 26, 2014; Revised November 4, 2014; Accepted November 5, 2014 ABSTRACT semi-automated text-mining approaches, and to en- hance curation quality control. The Biological General Repository for Interaction Datasets (BioGRID: http://thebiogrid.org) is an open access database that houses genetic and protein in- INTRODUCTION teractions curated from the primary biomedical lit- Massive increases in high-throughput DNA sequencing erature for all major model organism species and technologies (1) have enabled an unprecedented level of humans. As of September 2014, the BioGRID con- genome annotation for many hundreds of species (2–6), tains 749 912 interactions as drawn from 43 149 pub- which has led to tremendous progress in the understand- lications that represent 30 model organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary Visualisations of Gene Ontology Terms with GO-Figure!
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.12.02.408534; this version posted December 3, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. Summary Visualisations of Gene Ontology Terms with GO-Figure! Maarten JMF Reijnders1*, Robert M Waterhouse1* 1Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected] (MJMFR), [email protected] (RMW) Keywords: functional genomics, Python software, redundancy reduction, semantic similarity, GO term enrichment Abstract The Gene Ontology (GO) is a cornerstone of functional genomics research that drives discoveries through knowledge-informed computational analysis of biological data from large- scale assays. Key to this success is how the GO can be used to support hypotheses or conclusions about the biology or evolution of a study system by identifying annotated functions that are overrepresented in subsets of genes of interest. Graphical visualisations of such GO term enrichment results are critical to aid interpretation and avoid biases by presenting researchers with intuitive visual data summaries. Amongst current visualisation tools and resources there is a lack of standalone open-source software solutions that facilitate systematic comparisons of multiple lists of GO terms. To address this we developed GO-Figure!, an open-source Python software for producing user-customisable semantic similarity scatterplots of redundancy-reduced GO term lists. The lists are simplified by grouping together GO terms with similar functions using their quantified information contents and semantic similarities, with user-control over grouping thresholds.
    [Show full text]
  • Genedb and Wikidata[Version 1; Peer Review: 1 Approved, 1 Approved with Reservations]
    Wellcome Open Research 2019, 4:114 Last updated: 20 OCT 2020 SOFTWARE TOOL ARTICLE GeneDB and Wikidata [version 1; peer review: 1 approved, 1 approved with reservations] Magnus Manske , Ulrike Böhme , Christoph Püthe , Matt Berriman Parasites and Microbes, Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Cambridge, CB10 1SA, UK v1 First published: 01 Aug 2019, 4:114 Open Peer Review https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15355.1 Latest published: 14 Oct 2019, 4:114 https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15355.2 Reviewer Status Abstract Invited Reviewers Publishing authoritative genomic annotation data, keeping it up to date, linking it to related information, and allowing community 1 2 annotation is difficult and hard to support with limited resources. Here, we show how importing GeneDB annotation data into Wikidata version 2 allows for leveraging existing resources, integrating volunteer and (revision) report report scientific communities, and enriching the original information. 14 Oct 2019 Keywords GeneDB, Wikidata, MediaWiki, Wikibase, genome, reference, version 1 annotation, curation 01 Aug 2019 report report 1. Sebastian Burgstaller-Muehlbacher , This article is included in the Wellcome Sanger Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria Institute gateway. 2. Andra Waagmeester , Micelio, Antwerp, Belgium Any reports and responses or comments on the article can be found at the end of the article. Corresponding author: Magnus Manske ([email protected]) Author roles: Manske M: Conceptualization, Methodology, Software, Writing – Original Draft Preparation; Böhme U: Data Curation, Validation, Writing – Review & Editing; Püthe C: Project Administration, Writing – Review & Editing; Berriman M: Resources, Writing – Review & Editing Competing interests: No competing interests were disclosed. Grant information: This work was supported by the Wellcome Trust through a Biomedical Resources Grant to MB [108443].
    [Show full text]
  • Representing Glycophenotypes: Semantic Unification of Glycobiology Resources for Disease Discovery
    Representing glycophenotypes: semantic unification of glycobiology resources for disease discovery Authors: Jean-Philippe F. Gourdine1,2,3*, Matthew H. Brush1,3, Nicole A. Vasilevsky1,3, Kent Shefchek3,4, Sebastian Köhler3,5, Nicolas Matentzoglu3,6, Monica C. Munoz-Torres3,4, Julie A. McMurry3,4, Xingmin Aaron Zhang3,7, Melissa A. Haendel1,3,4 Affiliations: 1 Oregon Clinical & Translational Research Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 2 Oregon Health & Science University Library, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 3 Monarch Initiative, monarchinitiative.org. 4 Linus Pauling institute, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, USA. 5 Charité Centrum für Therapieforschung, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin 10117, Germany. 6 European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK. 7 The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, CT 06032, USA. Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract While abnormalities related to carbohydrates (glycans) are frequent for patients with rare and undiagnosed diseases as well as in many common diseases, these glycan-related phenotypes (glycophenotypes) are not well represented in knowledge bases (KBs). If glycan related diseases were more robustly represented and curated with glycophenotypes, these could be used for molecular phenotyping to help realize the goals of precision medicine. Diagnosis of rare diseases by computational cross-species comparison of genotype- phenotype data has been facilitated by leveraging ontological representations of clinical phenotypes, using Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO), and model organism ontologies such as Mammalian Phenotype Ontology (MP) in the context of the Monarch Initiative. In this article, we discuss the importance and complexity of glycobiology, and review the structure of glycan-related content from existing KBs and biological ontologies.
    [Show full text]