DOCSLIB.ORG

CONGRESS MONITORING VISIT to the REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA Chişinău, Drăsliceni (13-15 June 2018)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONGRESS MONITORING VISIT to the REPUBLIC of MOLDOVA Chişinău, Drăsliceni (13-15 June 2018) CONGRESS MONITORING VISIT TO THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA Chişinău, Drăsliceni (13-15 June 2018) PRELIMINARY DRAFT PROGRAMME Congress delegation: Rapporteurs: Ms Gunn Marit HELGESEN Rapporteur on local democracy Vice-President of the Congress President of the Chamber of Regions, EPP/CCE1 Mayor of Telemark, Norway Mr Marc COOLS Rapporteur on local democracy Chamber of Local Authorities, ILDG2 First Deputy Mayor, Uccle, Belgium Congress secretariat: Ms Stéphanie POIREL Secretary to the Monitoring Committee of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Ms Alessandra D’ARRIGO Assistant to the Monitoring Committee of the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe Expert: Prof. Angel M. MORENO Expert, Chair of the Group of Independents Experts on the European Charter of Local Self-Government Interpreters: (provided by the Council of Europe) Mr Serge BUFTEAC Mr Alexandru MELENCIUC The working language of the meetings will be English. Interpretation from and into Romanian will be provided. 1 EPP/CCE: European People’s Party Group of the Congress. 2 ILDG: Independent Liberal Democrat Group in the Congress Tel ► +33 (0)3 8841 2110 Fax ► +33 (0)3 8841 2719 [email protected] Wednesday 13 June 2018 Chişinău Joint meeting with the National Delegation, the Congress of Local Authorities of Moldova (CALM) and expert: National Delegation Of Moldova To The Congress And Representatives Of The Congress Of Local Authorities Of Moldova (CALM): Ms Tatiana BADAN, Mayor of Selemet, raion Cimislia, President of the CALM, Head of Delegation Mrs Iraida BINZARI, Head of Falesti District, Full Member of the Congress Mr Dorin CHIRTOACA, Vice-President of the Congress, Full Member of the Congress Mr Constantin COJOCARI, Mayor of Edinet, Full Member of the Congress Mr Gheorghe RAILEANU, Mayor of Cimislia, Full Member of the Congress Mrs Valentina CASIAN, Mayor of Straseni, Alternate Member of the Congress Mrs Violeta CRUDU, Mayor of Cruzesti Village, Alternate Member of the Congress Mr Grigore POLICINSCHI, President of the Region of Dubasari, Alternate Member of the Congress Mr Vasile ROMANIUC, Head of Ocnita District, Alternate Member of the Congress Mr Alexandr TARNAVSKI, Deputy Head of the popular Assembly of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia, Alternate Member of the Congress Independent Expert: Mr Ion BESCHIERU Joint meeting with the Union of the Rayon Councils (UCRM) and the Association of City Mayors Mr Veaceslav BURLACU, President of the Union of the Rayon Councils Mr Alexandru BOTNARI, President of the Association of City Mayors, Mayor of Hîncești Mr Petru COZLAN, Mayor of Cățeleni, President of Rayonal Association of Mayors Ms Eugenia PLACINTA, Assistant to the President of the Association of City Mayors State Chancellery Mr Filip PAVEL, Prime Minister Mr Adrian ERMURACHI, Deputy Secretary General of the Government Ms Uliana STICI, Main Consultant, Public Administration Department 2 Authorities of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia Ms Irina VLAH, Governor (Bashkan) of Gagauzia Ombudsman Ms Svetlana RUSU, Head of the Investigation and Monitoring Division in the Office of the People`s Advocate Thursday 14 June 2018 Chişinău Chisinau City Hall Mr Andrei NĂSTASE, Mayor of Chisinau Constitutional Court Mr Aurel BAIESU, Constitutional Judge Mr Teodor PAPUC, Deputy Head of the Secretariat Court of Accounts Mr Veaceslav UNTILA, President Ministry of Agriculture, Regional Development and Environment Mr Liviu VOLCONOVICI, Minister Ms Galina PETRACHI, Head of Policies and Programmes for rural development Department Mr Igor MALAI, Head of Policies for Regional Development Department Ms Olga SERBINOS, Head of Territorial Planning Department City Hall of Drăsliceni Mr Petru BUZU, Mayor of Drăsliceni 3 Friday 15 June 2018 Chişinău Ministry of Finance Mr Octavian ARMAȘU, Minister of Finance Ms Veronica SIRETEANU, State Secretary Ms Tatiana IVANICICHINA, State Secretary 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Moldova: Background and U.S. Policy
    Moldova: Background and U.S. Policy Steven Woehrel Specialist in European Affairs April 23, 2014 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21981 Moldova: Background and U.S. Policy Summary Although a small country, Moldova has been of interest to U.S. policy makers due to its position between NATO and EU member Romania and strategic Ukraine. In addition, some experts have expressed concern about Russian efforts to extend its hegemony over Moldova through various methods, including a troop presence, manipulation of Moldova’s relationship with its breakaway Transnistria region, and energy supplies and other economic links. Moldova’s political and economic weakness has made it a source of organized criminal activity of concern to U.S. policy makers, including trafficking in persons. U.S. and Moldovan experts have expressed concern about whether Russian President Putin’s annexation of Crimea and attempted destabilization of eastern Ukraine presages a similar effort toward Moldova, including Russian recognition of the independence of Transnistria. After July 2009 parliamentary elections, a group of opposition parties to the then-ruling Party of Communists of the Republic of Moldova (PCRM) formed a governing coalition that pledged to carry out reforms with the goal of closer integration with the European Union. There are few ideological differences among the governing parties, which are mainly vehicles for key political leaders and politically connected big businessmen. New parliamentary elections are expected to be held in November 2014. Moldova is Europe’s poorest country, according to the World Bank. Moldova’s GDP grew by a rapid 8.9% in 2013, spurred by strong consumer spending and a good agricultural harvest, rebounding from a drought the previous year.
    [Show full text]
  • GAGAUZIA REGION, MOLDOVA Mayors for Economic Growth (M4EG) Pioneer Project
    ESTABLISHING REGIONAL BUSINESS INFORMATION AND SUPPORT CENTRE FOR THE GAGAUZIA REGION, MOLDOVA Mayors for Economic Growth (M4EG) Pioneer Project PROJECT FACTSHEET The project in a nutshell Timeframe: 2018-2020 Budget: EUR 516,172 (EU contribution - EUR 428,172) Partners: the Executive Committee of Gagauzia, the International Agency for Source Country Information (IASCI) office in Moldova (NEXUS) Geographic coverage: the Gagauzia region (especially the Comrat, Ceadîr-Lunga and Vulcănești districts) Target groups: Groups of entrepreneurs supported by the Regional Business Information and Support Centre (RBISC), the local business community, local public administrations (LPAs) from the Gagauzia region CONTEXT Gagauzia is an autonomous region in southern Moldova, established as such by the “Law on the Special Legal Status of Gagauzia” of December 1994. Its surface area is 1,848 km2 or 5.5% of the country. The region’s 161,900 inhabitants (59.2% of whom live in rural areas) live in the 3 districts of Comrat, Ceadîr-Lunga and Vulcănești. Gagauzia has two municipalities, one town (Comrat, its administrative centre) and 23 villages and communes. The Governor (Başkan) is the highest-ranking official in Gagauzia. The Gagauz people are unique in that they combine the linguistic identity, traditions and customs of the Turkish world with the Christian religion. The region’s main economic sectors are agriculture, food and drinks (wine, canned fruits and vegetables) and manufacturing (textiles and footwear). The Economic and Social Development Strategy of Gagauzia for 2017-2022 acknowledges the importance of local economic development and includes provisions to increase the competitiveness of local businesses and SMEs. PROJECT GOAL AND OBJECTIVES The Project’s main goal is to improve the quality of life of Gagauzia’s citizens by creating jobs, reducing migration and encouraging the region’s overall economic development.
    [Show full text]
  • Labour Market
    GENDER DIFFERENCES ON SUB-NATIONAL LEVEL IN MOLDOVA Nina Chesnokova National Statistical Bureau March 2014, Geneva Need for comparative gender analysis at subnational level Law on Regional Development setting out main regional development objectives, principles, frameworks and planning instruments Government Programme "European Integration: Freedom, Democracy, Prosperity" Moldavian National Demographic Security Strategy Gender Disparities in Politics Results of latest local elections: Gender disparities at registration phase: 4,204 candidates to Mayors and Vice Mayors, including 843 females (20%) were registered and only one in four female candidate was elected. The largest representation of female candidates was in the local administration of the Southern Zone - 25%, and in Cimislia District of the zone it was 42%. However, only 7 out of 53 female candidates were elected in the region. Female candidates are mostly successful in elections of District, Rural and Municipal Councillors: up to 40% were elected in some regions. However, in some administrative areas there are less than 20% of female councillors. Only 3 women were elected District Chairpersons - one in each of three regions: North, Centre and South, which is only 8.8% of total number of Chairpersons. Population Size and Structure About 30% of the population live both in the Northern and Central Zones, over 15% live in the Southern Zone and the population of Gagauzia is about 5% of the total population of the country. Residents of Chișinău Municipality comprise about a fifth of the total population of the country. Steady depopulation trends prevail in three regions: Centre, South and especially North. 51.9% of the total population are women and 48.1% are men.
    [Show full text]
  • Devolution in Moldova
    ENC ANALYSIS Devolution in Moldova: Gagauzia and Transnistria in Focus. March 2019 Author: Larisa Patlis @ENC_Europe ABOUT THE AUTHOR Larisa Patlis is IR and Political Science Professor at Free International University of Moldova (ULIM), where she received her licentiate diploma and M.A. in International Relations (European Studies) in 2005 and 2006, respectively. She is also an ENC Academic Council Member, a researcher at the Institute of History and Political Science (ULIM) and a Ph.D. candidate at the Institute of Law and Political Science. She has conducted research and professional development visits in Poland (2008, 2009, 2013), Hungary (2009), Austria (2010), Lithuania (2010), Turkey (2011), Ukraine (2012) USA (2012/13), Georgia (2016), Germany (2018). Her Ph.D. research focuses on devolution phenomenon, specifically on devolution in the Republic of Moldova. Larisa Patlis was a Carnegie Fellow in the Department of History and Politics and the Bishop Center for Ethical Leadership and Civic Engagement at USFSP (for Fall semester 2012), conducting a research on Devolutionary Trends in Moldova: The Case of Gagauz Yeri. In 2016 Larisa Patlis became a winner of the Carnegie Scholar Publication Program 2016 competition for alumni of the CRFP. 2 @ENC_Europe Devolution in Moldova: Gagauzia and Transnistria in Focus Introduction The processes of decentralization in contemporary unitary states represent a pervasive phenomenon. Their development means a retreat from the strictly unitary state model, since it does not take into account regional interests. A special status is granted to regions that are different from the main territory of the country along ethnic characteristics, due to historical background or because of geographical isolation.
    [Show full text]
  • Houben Thesis 2017
    The impact of dissident regions on European Union Rapprochement Master Thesis Gijs Houben Faculty of Humanities S1114581 Leiden University [email protected] Prof.dr. A.W.M. Gerrits Words: 15638 Much has been written about dissident regions such as Abkhazia, South Ossetia or Transnistria. Unfortunately until today little attention is given to Gagauzia, a dissident region that rejected the current Moldovan rapprochement towards the EU in its local referendum, organized in 2014. In contemporary academic literature very little is known about the influence of dissident regions like Gagauzia, Transnistria or Abkhazia on the EU rapprochement of their sovereign nation. Along with interviews and other primary sources a model is provided to discover the influence of the three mentioned dissident regions on the EU rapprochement. This research, at least, enriches the current existing academic literature regarding Gagauzia, at the same time it deeply emphasises the limited influence of dissident regions on sovereign nations’ EU rapprochement. !1 Table of Contents List of Abbreviations 3 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Research question 4 1.2 Research contribution 5 2. Methodology 6 2.1 Concepts & variables 6 2.2 Case Selection 6 2.3 Data Collection & methods 7 2.4 Generalisation 8 3. Theoretical framework 10 3.1 Rapprochement towards the European Union 10 3.2 Dissentient regions 11 3.2.1 Influence of dissident regions 13 3.3 The dissident regions 15 3.3.1 Abkhazia 15 3.3.2 Transnistria 18 3.3.3 Gagauzia 23 3.4 Moldova and the European Union 28 3.5 Georgia and the European Union 32 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Report on Elections in the Popular Assembly of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia, Republic of Moldova (20 November 2016)
    32nd SESSION Report CPR32(2017)02 13 March 2017 Information report on elections in the Popular Assembly of the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia, Republic of Moldova (20 November 2016) Monitoring Committee Rapporteur:1 Sevdia UGREKHELIDZE, Georgia (R, EPP/CCE) Summary Following the invitation of the President of the Central Election Commission of the Republic of Moldova, a Congress delegation carried out an electoral assessment mission of limited scope in the Autonomous Territorial Unit (ATU) of Gagauzia. Elections for the Popular Assembly of the Regions were held on 20 November 2016. The 2016 elections for the Popular Assembly was the first vote to be held under the new Electoral Code of ATU Gagauzia adopted in 2015. The new legal framework was generally well implemented on Election Day, which was held in an overall calm and orderly manner. The Congress delegation was able to visit some twenty polling stations in the three electoral districts and observed voting and parts of the counting process. The improved quality of voters lists, the level of preparation of the election administration as well as investigations into violations of the legislation constitute important elements of progress with regard to electoral processes in the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia. The Congress also welcomes the ban on foreign funds for campaign purposes as well as the establishment of the Central Election Commission of ATU Gagauzia as a permanent body. However, the Congress delegation heard allegations concerning recurring issues related to vote buying, the misuse of administrative resources and the lack of a real level playing field for all candidates, in particular in the media.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GAGAUZ in MOLDOVA Hülya Demirdirek, Oslo
    LIVING IN THE PRESENT: THE GAGAUZ IN MOLDOVA Hülya Demirdirek, Oslo In this paper I explore different ways of relating to the past in terms of a sense of belonging and claims over a certain territory. I shall describe the conditions in which Gagauz intellectuals - nation builders - produced competing historical narratives for the origin of the Gagauz people and the length of Gagauz settlement in southern Moldova. The content and form of these competing claims about the past do not however, make use of or relate to social practices among "ordinary" people. For their part, the latter relate to the past and reproduce a sense of belonging to the place through values attached to work on the soil and the commemoration of the dead. Their closest attachment is to the small rural communities in which they live; the larger unit, or "imagined community", to which they relate is still the Soviet Union. The process of downsizing the imagined community – by which I mean deconstituting the already existing one – is slower among the Gagauz than it is for larger units such as nation states (e.g. Moldova). I aim to show that the technique of construction, in this case the narrative of the Gagauz past produced by the nation-builders, can scarcely function ontologically. This is because, unlike the social practices that connect people to their past and locality, the nation-builders lack the tools to connect past knowledge to present experience and knowledge as they attempt to create a Gagauz national imagery. The Gagauz were given land under the Russian Empire and they have better memories of the Russians than of the Romanians.
    [Show full text]
  • Moldova, Early Parliamentary Elections, 11 July 2021
    INTERNATIONAL ELECTION OBSERVATION MISSION Republic of Moldova, Early Parliamentary Elections, 11 July 2021 STATEMENT OF PRELIMINARY FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS PRELIMINARY CONCLUSIONS The 11 July early parliamentary elections were well administered, competitive and fundamental freedoms were largely respected. While lower-level commissions enjoyed trust, key decisions of the Central Election Commission brought into question its impartiality. Candidates had ample opportunities to campaign and voters were provided a wide range of alternatives. The lack of effective campaign finance oversight left potential breaches unaddressed. Numerous televised debates allowed voters to be informed of contestants’ policies, but the majority of monitored news outlets displayed bias. The legal framework does not adequately regulate electoral dispute resolution, and the handling of electoral complaints further highlighted the importance of strengthening judicial independence. Election day was calm, transparent and the process was assessed overwhelmingly positively despite isolated cases of overcrowding and non- adherence to procedures. The legal framework is generally conducive for the conduct of democratic elections. The parliament’s 101 members were elected under a proportional representation system, which was reintroduced more than one year prior to its application and following an inclusive consultation process, in line with international good practice. Some key aspects of the electoral framework were also revised, including the lowering of thresholds for parties and blocs and strengthening the gender quota for candidate lists by introducing a placement requirement, in line with previous ODIHR and the Venice Commission recommendations. While some previous ODIHR and Venice Commission’s recommendations were addressed in recent amendments, further improvements are needed in particular to the legal framework on the complaints and appeals process and campaign finance oversight.
    [Show full text]
  • Shrinking Autonomy for Tatarstan and Gagauzia: the Perils of Flexible Institutional Design
    chapter 12 Shrinking Autonomy for Tatarstan and Gagauzia: The Perils of Flexible Institutional Design Federica Prina 1 Introductory Remarks Two and a half decades after the Soviet Union’s disintegration, forms of territo- rialised ethnicity continue to feature prominently in arrangements for the management of ethno-cultural diversity in the region. This chapter focuses on two forms of ethnicity-based territorial autonomy in post-Soviet states: the Republic of Tatarstan in Russia, and the Autonomous Territorial Unit of Gagauzia (Gagauz Yeri—hereinafter Gagauzia) in Moldova. Russia and Moldova’s common Soviet past has meant the direct application of Soviet nationalities policy,1 leading to significant legacies, particularly in the shape of ethno-federalism and notions of “institutionalized multinationality”.2 And, while the circumstances surrounding the establishment of the Republic of Tatarstan and Gagauzia are highly dissimilar, the two regions also display some commonalities in the dynamics that have shaped the format and levels of ter- ritorial autonomy in the post-Soviet period. Crucially, both entities have been confronted by an incremental reduction of their autonomy since the 1990s. The conditions for the undermining of territorial autonomy can be explained in light of institutional legacies, along with prevalent societal attitudes to legality—in the management of inter-ethnic relations and more generally— interacting with contemporary political developments in the two countries. The limited effectiveness of territorial autonomy can then be situated in the context of a prevalence of symbolic law and practice in diversity management: (post-)Soviet institutions have led to autonomy arrangements that have, in many cases, avoided violent conflict, but which, it is argued, have also been subject to manipulation in disregard of the rule of law, resulting in decreased 1 ‘Nationality’ is used in this chapter in the sense of the Russian natsional’nost’—a term akin to ‘ethnicity’.
    [Show full text]
  • The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the C
    THE CONGRESS 2. Welcomes the high turnout which, in the Congress’ opin- ion, reflects the continued faith of Gagauzian citizens in local OF LOCAL AND REGIONAL and regional democracy; AUTHORITIES 3. Determined to follow the progress made by the authorities of Moldova with a view to implementing the recommenda- tions addressed in its Recommendation 23 (2007), invites: Resolution 232 (2007)1 a. the Institutional Committee to continue monitoring the The election of the Bashkan situation of local and regional democracy in Moldova, includ- (Governor) of Gagauzia (Moldova) ing in Gagauzia, having regard to previous Congress recom- (observed on 3 and 17 December 2006) mendations on this matter; b. the Bureau of the Congress to give due consideration to the organisation of a pre-election observation mission to assess The Congress, the follow-up given to previous Congress recommendations and to Recommendation 213 (2007) in the field of election . Refers to: observation, in view of the forthcoming local elections in Moldova; a. the Committee of Ministers’ Statutory Resolution (2000) on the Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the c. the Bureau of the Congress to take any measures to accom- Council of Europe, in particular its Article 2, paragraph 3, pany the Moldovan authorities in implementing the above- entrusting the Congress with drawing up country reports on mentioned recommendations; the situation of local and regional democracy in member states (monitoring reports); d. the Venice Commission to expertise the recently amended Law �����������������������������of the Autonomous Territorial ����������������nit of Gagauzia No. 32-XXXIII/I on the election of the Governor of Gagauzia b.
    [Show full text]
  • Lea Raport Periodic Al Republicii Moldova
    ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES ACFC/SR/V(2019)011 Fifth Report submitted by the Republic of Moldova Pursuant to Article 25, paragraph 2 of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities – received on 22 May 2019 ACFC/SR/V(2019)011 FIFTH PERIODIC REPORT OF THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE FRAMEWORK CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF NATIONAL MINORITIES TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ………………………………………………………………………...3 PART I……………………………………………………………………………………4 Information on practical arrangements made by the Republic of Moldova to continue implementing the Framework Convention, to increase the involvement of civil society in the process and to pursue the dialogue with the Advisory Committee PART II…………………………………………………………………………………..7 Information on measures taken by the Republic of Moldova to address the issues for immediate action identified in the forth monitoring cycle and assessment of other core issues that are outstanding after four cycles. Situation in the Transnistrian region of the Republic of Moldova…………………………...7 Strengthening of national legal and regulatory framework…………………………………..8 Practical measures: Implementation of the Action Plan for 2017-2020 for the Strategy on the Consolidation of Interethnic Relations in the Republic of Moldova for2017-2027………………...…13 Measures taken to preserve the memory of the Holocaust victims, to study and to spread knowledge about the Holocaust…………………………………………………14 Implementation of the Action Plan to
    [Show full text]
  • De Facto States in the Post-Soviet Space
    Central and East European Studies DE FACTO STATES IN THE POST-SOVIET SPACE Spring term 2016/17 Lecture: Mondays, 11am – 12noon, CEES seminar room Seminar: Mondays, 12noon-1pm, CEES seminar room Dr Adrian Florea Lecturer in International Relations School of Social and Political Sciences 9 Lilybank Gardens, Room #201 Office hours: Tuesdays 9:15 - 11:15 Email: [email protected] Web: http://aflorea.weebly.com/ 1 INTRODUCTION Short description This course examines the dynamics surrounding the emergence and survival of de facto states in the post-Soviet space (Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh). The course will also highlight the strategies that de facto state leaders employ to gain domestic and international legitimacy. Course content This course investigates the dynamics surrounding the emergence and survival of de facto states in the post-Soviet space (Transnistria, Abkhazia, South Ossetia, Nagorno-Karabakh). In the first part of the semester, the course will examine how the East European and Caucasian de facto states came about as the Soviet Union began to unravel, and will discuss the domestic and external forces that enable each of these entities to survive. The course will also highlight the strategies that de facto state leaders employ to gain domestic and international legitimacy. In the second part of the semester, the course will address larger questions about the fragmented nature of authority in the contemporary international system. More precisely, the discussion will focus on how effective nonstate actors such as de facto state are at replicating state functions (e.g., establishing a monopoly over the use of force in a given territory and providing public goods).
    [Show full text]