Pan Africa News 9(2)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pan Africa News 9(2) Pan Africa News The Newsletter of the Committee for the Care and Conservation of Chimpanzees, and the Mahale Wildlife Conservation Society DECEMBER 2002 VOL. 9, NO. 2 P. A . N . EDITORIAL STAFF Contents Chief Editor: Toshisada Nishida, Kyoto University, Japan <FORUM> Establishing a long-term veterinary project Associate Editors: for free-ranging chimpanzees in Tanzania Christophe Boesch, Max-Planck Institute, Germany By Magdalena Lukasik 13 Jane Goodall, Jane Goodall Institute, USA <FORUM> Takayoshi Kano, Kyoto Sangyo University, Japan Chimpanzee viewing and regulation: Mahale Tetsuro Matsuzawa, Kyoto University, Japan Mountains National Park William C. McGrew, Miami University, USA Vernon Reynolds, Oxford University, UK By Zoe Purcell 17 Yukimaru Sugiyama, Tokai-Gakuen University, Japan <NOTE> Shigeo Uehara, Kyoto University, Japan New record of algae feeding and scooping by Richard W. Wrangham, Harvard University, USA Pan t. troglodytes at Lokoué Bai in Odzala National Park, Republic of Congo. Editorial Secretaries: By C. Devos, S. Gatti, & F. Levréro 19 Koichiro Zamma, Kyoto University, Japan Michio Nakamura, Japan Monkey Centre, Japan <NOTE> Kazuhiko Hosaka, Kamakura Women’s University, Japan Social scratch among chimpanzees in Gombe Michael A. Huffman, Kyoto University, Japan By Masaki Shimada 21 <NOTE> Competition between baboons and chimpanzees Instructions to Authors: at Mahale Pan Africa News welcomes your contributions. It By Toshisada Nishida 23 publishes news, forums, reviewed articles and notes, book reviews, letters to editor, and classified ads <NEWS> (restricted to non-profit organizations) on any aspect Human baby killed by Gombe chimpanzee of conservation and research regarding chimpanzees By Shadrack Kamenya 26 and bilias. Contributors are requested to write in <EDITORIAL> English and the papers except forum should usually be A request for conservation NGO/NPOs: 1,000 words or less. Manuscripts should be submitted by e-mail to: for the great apes’ “World Heritage Status” [email protected] By PAN Editors 26 Photos and figures, however, should be sent by <LETTER TO EDITOR> air mail to: T. Nishida, Dept. of Zoology, Graduate Orphanage of great ape babies School of Science, Kyoto University, Kitashirakawa- Oiwakecho, Sakyo, Kyoto, Japan. By Augustin Kanyunyi Basabose 27 Publication of the next issue will be June 2003. Deadline for manuscripts is the end of April. <FORUM> are still many—probably too many, chimpanzees Establishing a Long-term Vet- in captivity. But situation is very different when erinary Project for Free-Ranging it comes to the free-ranging communities. The range of problems jeopardising their exis- Chimpanzees in Tanzania tence is wide: bush-meat trade in Central and Western Africa, deforestation all around their Magdalena Lukasik, MDV natural habitat, finally: antropozoonotic diseases, Jane Goodall Institute, Gombe Stream which so easily cross the inter-species barrier Research Center, P.O. Box 185 Kigoma between human researchers, tourists and local inhabitants to the apes in forest. Generally speaking, Pan troglodytes is not an en- There are no records of chimpanzee hunting dangered species. Not as the whole species. There Printed on recycled paper 14 Pan Africa News, 9(2), December, 2002 in Tanzania, but two latter factors combined Veterinary Project working in Virunga National caused the death of about 25% population of Park in Rwanda, Uganda and Congo-Zaire. chimpanzees in the Gombe National Park in Tan- The attempts to establish similar Project for zania in the last decade. Reports from the Mahale free-ranging chimpanzees have started in Tan- Mountains National Park also indicate recent zania in October 2001, when the Chimpanzee noticeable decrease in the ape population. Health Project has been established within Due to scale of the problem and variety of Gombe Stream Research Center JGI in Gombe factors involved, it seems inevitable that people National Park. After one year of this study, which involved in various fields of research, conserva- was the pilot one, conducted without any veteri- tion and education join their forces to stop this nary facility yet present, lots of valuable infor- process. Because diseases, especially the mation about such project requirements and anthropozoonoses, are responsible for the death possibilities were gathered. of many of these animals (in Gombe at least 16 The Project work consisted of four main parts: chimpanzees died due to antropozoonotic illness- es in only last 6 years), it seems important that 1. Everyday monitoring of the chimpanzee the team includes also the veterinary component. health status, including observation and There are wildlife veterinarians working in sample collection from both healthy and sick Tanzania, who can be invited to collaboration, but animals. in case of great apes some specific knowledge and 2. Autopsy of every animal—including other skills are required comparing to working with species, found dead in the forest. other African wildlife. 3. Investigation and, in certain cases, treatment There are three facts to explain such an during general disease outbreaks. opinion. First, unlike most other wildlife veteri- 4. Close collaboration with TANAPA and Re- narians, an ape doctor works on foot, following searchers in order to decrease the risk of his patients around thick forest, carrying all antropozoonotic and zoonotic diseases within equipment, for many hours in a row. Second, the Park. dealing with the animals of such complex be- It included the regular social work programs: haviour and social life, it is very important to teaching (health seminars), vaccination in spend lot of time learning to understand their case of disease risk and general investigation reactions to different situations, including the to estimate the health status of the human health disorders. In order to gather this know- and non-human primates living in Gombe ledge veterinarian has to spend reasonable time National Park. just following his targets and watching them carefully for many hours. Also, especially when 1. Monitoring: Observation and Non- darting wild chimpanzees is very difficult, non- Invasive Sample Collection invasive sampling is a main part of practice. As indicated by the pilot study, if there is an on- Again, this requires long-term, regular follows. going research project at the site, this part of Third reason is due to genetical closeness of work can and preferably should be done in collab- apes and humans, which means that doctor and oration with researchers and their assistants. patient can possibly share almost all pathogens, The credits of such collaboration are substan- which therefore creates considerable risk for both tial and mutual. of them. Also, because apes are closer related to Due to the risk of antropozoonotic diseases it people than other animals, working with them is highly advisable to decrease number of people often requires close collaboration with human in contact with chimpanzees. Involving research- doctors and laboratories rather than these of vet- ers in basic veterinary monitoring and sampling erinary medicine. seems the best policy allowing to obtain more The possible solution for the problem is to thorough data without presence of additional vet- establish the project specialised in working with erinary assistants in forest. wild chimpanzees, following the example of Also, because of their everyday presence Morris Animal Foundation Mountain Gorilla around animals and good knowledge of chim- Pan Africa News, 9(2), December, 2002 15 panzee behaviour, researchers of diet and range • Hair (parasites, DNA) are able to notice many abnormalities sooner • Discharges: pus, sputum, exudates (bacteria, than veterinarian, who lacks this experience. So virus, parasites, cytology, DNA) not only they can be help with the data and • Blood—very small amount obtainable (bacteria, sample collection, but also may serve as the virus, parasites, antibodies, DNA). teachers for the veterinary team. If the simple Health Monitoring Sheets are 2. Autopsy used, the basic information can be recorded on Simultaneously to being the important source of every day base and the data compared within the diagnostic material, autopsy work with chimpan- long period of time. These sheets should be easy zees creates, much bigger than in case of other to understand by the non-vet assistants and species, risk for the humans involved. It is ex- ideally always carried by them during the forest tremely important to provide the safe conditions work. for this work, including the separate post mortem On the other hand, involving veterinarian in room and limiting number of people who have the behavioural research often helps explain certain contact with potentially highly infectious mate- abnormalities of behaviour connected with a rial. disease. Because of many pathogens shared by differ- Also post mortem findings can help under- ent primates, and even non-primate species in stand some unusual behaviour and a vet, follow- forest, it is important that any animal found dead ing the pattern of injuries and autopsy finding in a forest should be carefully examined and can help understand some facts of predatory and samples collected for the future laboratory test- intra- and intercommunity aggression. In addi- ing. tion a material collected for veterinary purpose can be simultaneously used for other research 3. Disease Investigation and Treatment purposes, for example urine collection for regular As in case of everyday health monitoring,
Recommended publications
  • EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan Paniscus)
    EAZA Best Practice Guidelines Bonobo (Pan paniscus) Editors: Dr Jeroen Stevens Contact information: Royal Zoological Society of Antwerp – K. Astridplein 26 – B 2018 Antwerp, Belgium Email: [email protected] Name of TAG: Great Ape TAG TAG Chair: Dr. María Teresa Abelló Poveda – Barcelona Zoo [email protected] Edition: First edition - 2020 1 2 EAZA Best Practice Guidelines disclaimer Copyright (February 2020) by EAZA Executive Office, Amsterdam. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in hard copy, machine-readable or other forms without advance written permission from the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA). Members of the European Association of Zoos and Aquaria (EAZA) may copy this information for their own use as needed. The information contained in these EAZA Best Practice Guidelines has been obtained from numerous sources believed to be reliable. EAZA and the EAZA APE TAG make a diligent effort to provide a complete and accurate representation of the data in its reports, publications, and services. However, EAZA does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy, or completeness of any information. EAZA disclaims all liability for errors or omissions that may exist and shall not be liable for any incidental, consequential, or other damages (whether resulting from negligence or otherwise) including, without limitation, exemplary damages or lost profits arising out of or in connection with the use of this publication. Because the technical information provided in the EAZA Best Practice Guidelines can easily be misread or misinterpreted unless properly analysed, EAZA strongly recommends that users of this information consult with the editors in all matters related to data analysis and interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Developments in the Study of Wild Chimpanzee Behavior
    Evolutionary Anthropology 9 ARTICLES Recent Developments in the Study of Wild Chimpanzee Behavior JOHN C. MITANI, DAVID P. WATTS, AND MARTIN N. MULLER Chimpanzees have always been of special interest to anthropologists. As our organization, genetics and behavior, closest living relatives,1–3 they provide the standard against which to assess hunting and meat-eating, inter-group human uniqueness and information regarding the changes that must have oc- relationships, and behavioral endocri- curred during the course of human evolution. Given these circumstances, it is not nology. Our treatment is selective, and surprising that chimpanzees have been studied intensively in the wild. Jane Good- we explicitly avoid comment on inter- all4,5 initiated the first long-term field study of chimpanzee behavior at the Gombe population variation in behavior as it National Park, Tanzania. Her observations of tool manufacture and use, hunting, relates to the question of chimpanzee and meat-eating forever changed the way we define humans. Field research on cultures. Excellent reviews of this chimpanzee behavior by Toshisada Nishida and colleagues6 at the nearby Mahale topic, of central concern to anthropol- Mountains National Park has had an equally significant impact. It was Nishida7,8 ogists, can be found elsewhere.12–14 who first provided a comprehensive picture of the chimpanzee social system, including group structure and dispersal. SOCIAL ORGANIZATION No single issue in the study of wild Two generations of researchers erything about the behavior of these chimpanzee behavior has seen more have followed Goodall and Nishida apes in nature. But this is not the case. debate than the nature of their social into the field.
    [Show full text]
  • Commitment 2014 Annual Report
    THE POWER OF COMMITMENT 2014 ANNUAL REPORT 1 2014 HIGHLIGHTS BY-THE-NUMBERS Protecting Great Apes Sustainable Livelihoods Continued ongoing care for 154 chimpanzees at the Produced and distributed more than 365,000 different Tchimpounga sanctuary. kinds of trees and plants that either provide food, building materials or income for communities and reduce Released an additional seven chimpanzees on to demand for cutting down forests that would otherwise be safe, natural, expanded sanctuary sites on Tchibebe and chimpanzee habitat. Tchindzoulou islands, bringing the total to 35 now living on the islands. Provided training to 331 farmers in agroforestry and/ or animal husbandry and provided them with either tree Released seven mandrills back into Conkouati-Douli seedlings or livestock to grow and sell. In addition, JGI National Park, and started the first phase of release with distributed 100 beehives to help families produce honey five more mandrills. as a source of income. Supported 11 studies by research partners at Gombe Built nearly 700 fuel efficient stoves to help decrease Stream Research Center, which resulted in 31 scientific household costs and demand for cutting forests for papers, theses and presentations. firewood. Erected an additional ten public awareness billboards in Republic of Congo bringing the total over the halfway point to our goal of 70 total billboards in the country. Healthy Habitats Science & Technology Increased protection of 512,000 hectares (1.3 million Used crowd-sourced forest monitoring beginning in acres) of forest in the Masito-Ugalla ecosystem of Tanzania 2012 through 2014 to generate 34,347 observations through newly established reserves previously considered from Tanzania and 15,006 observations from Uganda “general land.” of chimpanzee and other wildlife presence and illegal human activities.
    [Show full text]
  • Gorilla Beringei (Eastern Gorilla) 07/09/2016, 02:26
    Gorilla beringei (Eastern Gorilla) 07/09/2016, 02:26 Kingdom Phylum Class Order Family Animalia ChordataMammaliaPrimatesHominidae Scientific Gorilla beringei Name: Species Matschie, 1903 Authority: Infra- specific See Gorilla beringei ssp. beringei Taxa See Gorilla beringei ssp. graueri Assessed: Common Name(s): English –Eastern Gorilla French –Gorille de l'Est Spanish–Gorilla Oriental TaxonomicMittermeier, R.A., Rylands, A.B. and Wilson D.E. 2013. Handbook of the Mammals of the World: Volume Source(s): 3 Primates. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona. This species appeared in the 1996 Red List as a subspecies of Gorilla gorilla. Since 2001, the Eastern Taxonomic Gorilla has been considered a separate species (Gorilla beringei) with two subspecies: Grauer’s Gorilla Notes: (Gorilla beringei graueri) and the Mountain Gorilla (Gorilla beringei beringei) following Groves (2001). Assessment Information [top] Red List Category & Criteria: Critically Endangered A4bcd ver 3.1 Year Published: 2016 Date Assessed: 2016-04-01 Assessor(s): Plumptre, A., Robbins, M. & Williamson, E.A. Reviewer(s): Mittermeier, R.A. & Rylands, A.B. Contributor(s): Butynski, T.M. & Gray, M. Justification: Eastern Gorillas (Gorilla beringei) live in the mountainous forests of eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, northwest Rwanda and southwest Uganda. This region was the epicentre of Africa's "world war", to which Gorillas have also fallen victim. The Mountain Gorilla subspecies (Gorilla beringei beringei), has been listed as Critically Endangered since 1996. Although a drastic reduction of the Grauer’s Gorilla subspecies (Gorilla beringei graueri), has long been suspected, quantitative evidence of the decline has been lacking (Robbins and Williamson 2008). During the past 20 years, Grauer’s Gorillas have been severely affected by human activities, most notably poaching for bushmeat associated with artisanal mining camps and for commercial trade (Plumptre et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Called “Talking Animals” Taught Us About Human Language?
    Linguistic Frontiers • 1(1) • 14-38 • 2018 DOI: 10.2478/lf-2018-0005 Linguistic Frontiers Representational Systems in Zoosemiotics and Anthroposemiotics Part I: What Have the So- Called “Talking Animals” Taught Us about Human Language? Research Article Vilém Uhlíř* Theoretical and Evolutionary Biology, Department of Philosophy and History of Sciences. Charles University. Viničná 7, 12843 Praha 2, Czech Republic Received ???, 2018; Accepted ???, 2018 Abstract: This paper offers a brief critical review of some of the so-called “Talking Animals” projects. The findings from the projects are compared with linguistic data from Homo sapiens and with newer evidence gleaned from experiments on animal syntactic skills. The question concerning what had the so-called “Talking Animals” really done is broken down into two categories – words and (recursive) syntax. The (relative) failure of the animal projects in both categories points mainly to the fact that the core feature of language – hierarchical recursive syntax – is missing in the pseudo-linguistic feats of the animals. Keywords: language • syntax • representation • meta-representation • zoosemiotics • anthroposemiotics • talking animals • general cognition • representational systems • evolutionary discontinuity • biosemiotics © Sciendo 1. The “Talking Animals” Projects For the sake of brevity, I offer a greatly selective review of some of the more important “Talking Animals” projects. Please note that many omissions were necessary for reasons of space. The “thought climate” of the 1960s and 1970s was formed largely by the Skinnerian zeitgeist, in which it seemed possible to teach any animal to master any, or almost any, skill, including language. Perhaps riding on an ideological wave, following the surprising claims of Fossey [1] and Goodall [2] concerning primates, as well as the claims of Lilly [3] and Batteau and Markey [4] concerning dolphins, many scientists and researchers focussed on the continuities between humans and other species, while largely ignoring the discontinuities and differences.
    [Show full text]
  • Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees
    ADVANCES IN THE STUDY OF BEHAVIOR VOL. 35 Conflict and Cooperation in Wild Chimpanzees MARTIN N. MULLER* and JOHN C. MITANIt *DEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY BOSTON UNIVERSITY BOSTON, MASSACHUSETTS, 02215, USA tDEPARTMENT OF ANTHROPOLOGY UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN, 48109, USA 1. INTRODUCTION The twin themes of competition and cooperation have been the focus of many studies in animal behavior (Alcock, 2001; Dugatkin, 2004; Krebs and Davies, 1997). Competition receives prominent attention because it forms the basis for the unifying, organizing principle of biology. Darwin's (1859) theory of natural selection furnishes a powerful framework to understand the origin and maintenance of organic and behavioral diversity. Because the process of natural selection depends on reproductive competition, aggression, dominance, and competition for mates serve as important foci of ethological research. In contrast, cooperation in animals is less easily explained within a Darwinian framework. Why do animals cooperate and behave in ways that benefit others? Supplements to the theory of natural selection in the form of kin selection, reciprocal altruism, and mutualism provide mechanisms that transform the study of cooperative behavior in animals into a mode of inquiry compatible with our current understand- ing of the evolutionary process (Clutton-Brock, 2002; Hamilton, 1964; Trivers, 1971). If cooperation can be analyzed via natural selection operating on indivi- duals, a new way to conceptualize the process emerges. Instead of viewing cooperation as distinct from competition, it becomes productive to regard them together. Students of animal behavior have long recognized that an artificial dichotomy may exist insofar as animals frequently cooperate to compete with conspecifics.
    [Show full text]
  • Do Apes and Monkeys Rely Upon Conceptual Reversibility? a Review of Studies Using Seriated Nesting Cups in Children and Nonhuman Primates
    Anim Cogn (2001) 4:315–324 DOI 10.1007/s10071-001-0117-4 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Julie Johnson-Pynn · Dorothy M. Fragaszy Do apes and monkeys rely upon conceptual reversibility? A review of studies using seriated nesting cups in children and nonhuman primates Received: 2 October 2000 / Accepted after revision: 10 September 2001 / Published online: 26 October 2001 © Springer-Verlag 2001 Abstract The ability to seriate nesting cups as a sensori- Keywords Seriation · Skill development · Nonhuman motor task has posed interesting questions for cognitive primates · Perceptual-motor learning scientists. Greenfield et al. [(1972) Cognit Psychol 3:291– 310] found parallels between children’s combinatorial ac- tivity with nesting cups and patterns of phonological and Introduction grammatical constructions. The parallels suggested the possibility of a neurally based developmental homology A sizeable body of literature documents both variety and between language and instrumental action [Greenfield complexity in children’s manipulation of objects in free (1991) Behav Brain Sci 14:531–595]. Children who pre- play and in goal-oriented tasks (e.g., Bruner 1973; McCall dominantly used subassembly, a hierarchical method of 1974; Fenson et al. 1976; Wood et al. 1976). In children, combining cups, succeeded at seriating nesting cups more the ability to seriate, or order a set of objects by size from often than those who did not. Greenfield and others [e.g., smallest to largest, has been interpreted as a form of logi- Piaget and Inhelder (1969) The psychology of the child. cal cognition that stems from actions such as putting ob- Basic Books, New York; DeLoache et al. (1985) Child jects in piles, aligning objects, and arranging objects in an Dev 56:928–939] argued that success in seriation reflects array (Inhelder and Piaget 1964; Woodward 1972; Langer the child’s growing recognition of a reversible relation- 1980).
    [Show full text]
  • Jane Goodall
    Jane Goodall Dame Jane Morris Goodall, DBE (born Valerie Jane Morris-Goodall on 3 April 1934) is a British primatologist, ethologist, anthropologist, and UN Messenger of Peace.Considered to be the world's foremost expert on chimpanzees, Goodall is best known for her 45-year study of social and family interactions of wild chimpanzees in Gombe Stream National Park, Tanzania. She is the founder of the Jane Goodall Institute and the Roots & Shoots program, and she has worked extensively on conservation and animal welfare issues. She has served on the board of the Nonhuman Rights Project since its founding in 1996. Early years Jane Goodall was born in London, England, in 1934 to Mortimer Herbert Morris-Goodall, a businessman, and Margaret Myfanwe Joseph, a novelist who wrote under the name Vanne Morris-Goodall. As a child, she was given a lifelike chimpanzee toy named Jubilee by her father; her fondness for the toy started her early love of animals. Today, the toy still sits on her dresser in London. As she writes in her book, Reason for Hope: "My mother's friends were horrified by this toy, thinking it would frighten me and give me nightmares." Goodall has a sister, Judith, who shares the same birthday, though the two were born four years apart. Africa Goodall had always been passionate about animals and Africa, which brought her to the farm of a friend in the Kenya highlands in 1957.From there, she obtained work as a secretary, and acting on her friend's advice, she telephoned Louis Leakey, a Kenyan archaeologist and palaeontologist, with no other thought than to make an appointment to discuss animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Analysis of Gorilla, Chimps and Humans Using Sequence Divergence
    Journal of Bioinformatics and Sequence Analysis Vol. 3(1), pp. 1-5, January 2011 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/JBSA ISSN 2141-2464 ©2011 Academic Journals Full length Research Paper Evolutionary analysis of gorilla, chimps and humans using sequence divergence Vibhu Ranjan Prasad, Soumya Chaurasia and Rao Sethumadhavan* School of Bioscience and Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore, Tamil Nadu – 632014, India. Accepted 30 September, 2010 We have analyzed the sequence divergence amongst the three species that is, gorilla, chimpanzee and human varying from Hominidae and Pongidae. Apart from the genomic phylogeny, we compared the protein and rRNA phylogenies to increase the importance of phylogenetic analysis. The proteins selected are from the mitochondrial origin as mtDNA which codes for mitochondrial proteins, mutate at a higher rate compared to nuclear DNA, so as to give a more useful, magnified view of the diversity present in a population, and its history. The phylogenetic analysis of the mitochondrial genome, rRNA and proteins are done using parsimony, BIONJ and PHYML methods which $resulted into variable results. The proteins that were able to infer the already stated phylogeny between these members were ATP synthase subunit 6 and 8, cytochrome b, cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 and 3 and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2, 3 and 5. Although BIONJ and PHYML methods predicted similar results most often parsimony was found to be predicting contradictory phylogeny with respect to above two methods. To verify the results as obtained from various methods and to further analyze the evolutionary relationship between these members, we applied the method of calculating sequence divergence using bioinformatics tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Could a Chimpanzee Or Bonobo Take the Stand?
    \\Server03\productn\L\LCA\8-1\LCA109.txt unknown Seq: 1 25-APR-02 15:25 COULD A CHIMPANZEE OR BONOBO TAKE THE STAND? By Angela Campbell* The federal competency standards for witnesses testifying on the stand are fairly liberal. Witnesses must be able to distinguish right from wrong, un- derstand the concept of punishment, perceive events, and remember those events to communicate them in the future. Chimpanzees and bonobos are able to do all of these things to some degree, and therefore, arguably satisfy the federal competency standards. In some situations, this indicates that these nonhuman apes should be allowed to testify in court, subject to the federal competency and interpreter rules. I. INTRODUCTION Chimpanzees and bonobos resemble human beings more than any other living nonhuman animals.1 Chimpanzee and bonobo DNA is more closely related to human DNA than to the DNA of other apes.2 In fact, at least one scientist has proposed that humans are, for all in- tents and purposes, a third species of chimpanzee.3 One of the high- lighted differences between humans and their closest ape relatives is the lack of proof that nonhuman apes can produce complex tools, calen- dars or religions.4 These factors, however, are abstract skills which are not required to establish legal personhood or legal standing. Young * Ms. Campbell will receive her J.D. from Boston College Law School in May 2002. She received her B.A. from Yale University, and in August of 2002 she will begin clerk- ing for the Honorable C. Arlen Beam in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.
    [Show full text]
  • An Enlightened Future for Bristol Zoo Gardens
    OURWORLD BRISTOL An Enlightened Future for Bristol Zoo Gardens An Enlightened Future for CHAPTERBristol EADING / SECTIONZoo Gardens OUR WORLD BRISTOL A magical garden of wonders - an oasis of learning, of global significance and international reach forged from Bristol’s long established place in the world as the ‘Hollywood’ of natural history film-making. Making the most of the city’s buoyant capacity for innovation in digital technology, its restless appetite for radical social change and its celebrated international leadership in creativity and story-telling. Regenerating the site of the first provincial zoological garden in the World, following the 185 year old Zoo’s closure, you can travel in time and space to interact in undreamt of ways with the wildest and most secret aspects of the animal kingdom and understand for the first time where humankind really sits within the complex web of Life on Earth. b c OURWORLD BRISTOL We are pleased to present this preliminary prospectus of an alternative future for Bristol's historic Zoo Gardens. We do so in the confidence that we can work with the Zoo, the City of Bristol and the wider community to ensure that the OurWorld project is genuinely inclusive and reflects Bristol’s diverse population and vitality. CONTENTS Foreword 2 A Site Transformed 23 A Transformational Future for the Our Challenge 4 Zoo Gardens 24 Evolution of the Site Through Time 26 Site Today 27 Our Vision 5 Reimagining the Site 32 A Zoo Like No Other 6 Key Design Moves 34 Humanimal 7 Anatomy 38 Time Bridge 10 Alfred the Gorilla Lives Again 12 Supporters And Networks 45 Supporters 46 Networks 56 Advisors and Contact 59 Printed in Bristol by Hobs on FSC paper 1 FOREWORD OURWORLD BRISTOL FOREWORD Photo: © Dave Stevens Our demand for resources has Bristol Zoo will hold fond This century we are already pushed many other memories for so many.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mini Lesson
    BreakingNewsEnglish - The Mini Lesson U.S. police to look into True / False shooting of zoo gorilla a) The gorilla that was shot was 7 years old. T / F 2nd June, 2016 b) The little boy jumped into the gorilla's Police in the US enclosure. T / F state of Ohio are c) The water the gorilla dragged the boy through going to look into was not deep. T / F the shooting of a 17-year gorilla at d) The gorilla was upset by the noises of the Cincinnati Zoo. crowd. T / F They will investigate e) Zookeepers said a tranquilizer gun would the facts around the never sedate a big gorilla. T / F killing of Harambe the gorilla after a f) An online petition blaming the mother was four-year-old boy signed by 300,000 people. T / F fell into the ape's g) The mother said some parents can watch their enclosure on Saturday. Video footage showed the children every second. T / F gorilla dragging the boy through shallow water in his cage for up to ten minutes. Some people who h) The mother said society is quick to judge were at the zoo said they were worried about the parents. T / F little boy's safety. Other people said the gorilla was trying to protect the child and that the animal was Synonym Match becoming upset by the noise from the crowds of people looking at the event. Zookeepers made a 1. look into a. pulling decision to shoot the gorilla because they feared for 2. enclosure b.
    [Show full text]