Walter Benjamin and John Berger on the Concept

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Walter Benjamin and John Berger on the Concept The concept of experience: a transformation in ”the politics of educational method” Øivind Haaland Lillehammer University College In John Berger's book "King" we are led to a place we haven't been - from where few stories come. We are led to a wasteland beside the motorway. Here at the end of the twentieth century, amongst smashed lorries, old boilers and broken washing machines live the homeless. This time, with this book, it is the homeless people Berger is forcing us to see. John Berger is the storyteller of the marginalised: peasants, migrants and the homeless. I will try to lead him into the quarters of social science convinced that he belongs here, too. The main purpose is to discuss the problem of communicating experience. I believe the learning process, even for the intellectuals, basically is an act of mimicry. The scientists’ mimetic “factories” might probably be the universities, colleges or the research centers. John Berger has mimed - Walter Benjamin - the German philosopher, essayist and European vagabond in the nineteen twenties and thirties. The fact that the latter lacked and the former is lacking, specific scientific community support and direction are not what I had in mind. Comparing the one with the other, we find in relation to experience and the communication of experience, them both to have similar comprehension. In that respect I think John Berger has demonstrated that he is in possession of what Walter Benjamin (1979 a,b) once called "the forgotten mimetic faculty of becoming similar". John Berger's main ambition with his writing has been to help us find a way "home" in times when that would be an impossible endeavor. Just listen to what he tells us about "home" and the effect of homelessness. The book that perhaps comes closest to be labeled theoretical and from were some theoretical position might be extracted would be: "And Our faces, my heart, brief as photos." (1984 p55-57) In a part of this book, John Berger's narration focuses on the ancient human beings and their nomadic activity. Mircea Eliade (1969) has demonstrated that in these ancient/ archaic societies the word "home" (Old Norwegian heimr) was synonymous with a place where the world might be founded. A "home" originally meant the center of the world – not in geographical, but in ontological sense. A home was established at" the heart of the real". In these traditional societies everything that made sense of the world was real. The surrounding chaos existed and was threatening, but it was threatening because it was unreal. Without a home where reality was, the man was not only without shelter, but also lost in non-being, in unreality. Without “home” everything was fragmentation. Berger draws a horizontal line representing the nomadic traffic of the world, and a vertical line connecting the gods in heaven and the dead in the under world. Home was the center of the world because it was the place were the vertical line crossed with the horizontal one - the coordinates of the human beings reality. Wherever they moved along the horizontal line they carried their vertical line with them, as they might carry a tent pole. This pole supporting their tent made "home" become more than a shelter. It became the center of the earth - the space of reality - the place where the past and the future is connected by the dead in the underworld, the gods in heaven and their own activity in time and space. 234 Reality was the space of activity. The surroundings were frightening and without meaning. It was unreal. John Berger’s conception of man seems to be in correspondence with theories related to pragmatism or activity theory (Enerstvedt 1982). No wonder – old Marxist that he is. It is through activity – praxis - that knowledge, conscience, meaning and identity develop. John Berger’s point is that it is of fundamental importance for man to find home in the original meaning of the word. The amount of wars, mass deportations and exploitation of people in the modern world has rendered the safeguarding, the establishing and the reconstruction of home as “the center of the world” an impossible task. Man never finds a place where the two lifelines cross. The vertical line exists no more; there is no longer any local continuity between him and the dead, the dead no simply disappear; and the gods have become inaccessible. The vertical line has been twisted into the individual biographical circle, which lead nowhere but only encloses. As for the horizontal lines, because there are no longer any fixed points as bearings, they are elided into a plain and pure distance, across which everything is swept. At its most brutal, home is no more than one’s name – whilst to most people one is nameless. Homeless meaninglessness rules. Loss of meaning and loss of home is parts of the same matter in John Berger´s conception. John Berger the storyteller has learned from, mimed, Walter Benjamin the philosopher and essayist understanding of experience and communication of experience. Let us see what Walter Benjamin, in his essay “The storyteller” published in 1936, tells us about the storyteller and the relation between storytelling and experience. The storyteller is dead. In the modern society there is no longer room for his existence. The original storyteller, his stories and his role, was created from to lines of development. The one in the image of the farmer: The man with long and close contact with the local community – knowing the histories and the local condition of life. The other in the image of the sailor: The man who told stories from above the ocean. The former communicated along the vertical line and the latter along the horizontal one. The images of the farmer and the sailor represent the foundation of two different categories of stories still traceable although they melted into one storytelling figure. He was embodied in the craftsmen of the medieval. Benjamin says something like this: “If the farmer and the sailor were the old masters of stories – then the rank of craftsmen represented the university of stories.” It is this storytelling figure and the faculties he developed that are disappearing. With it the human being looses its ability to communicate experience. Experience is devaluated. It is concurred by new from of communication of the high-capitalistic society – information. Information has to be understandable in itself; it demands almost an immediate verification and high level of abstraction. The story or the communications of experience on the other hand have practical interests. Benjamin states as a fact that the real stories always openly or disguised contain something useful. The usefulness might be a moral statement or a practical one. The storyteller has advice for the listener. But what is an advice in Benjamin’s mind? “Advice is not as much an answer to a question as it is a suggestion concerning a story – a story that unfolds whether the advice is taken or not. To give this advice you have to know how to tell the story. (How a man conceives advice depends on his ability to see his own situation clearly.)” 235 The art of storytelling is reaching its end because the epic side of truth, wisdom, is dying out. Wisdom, for Benjamin, is advice woven with living life. The ability to listen to stories is lost. To tell a story is the art of reproducing and this ability is lost when there is no-one remembering. The story does not focus the matter “an sich” as it is with information and reporting. The story dips the matter into the narrator’s life. When it is later brought up again the story contains the narrators “fingerprints”. When the listener becomes narrator the story will be imprinted with his experience and may even have had an effect upon his life as advice. I think Walter Benjamin (1975) with his essay “The Storyteller” conceived the “narratory principle” in social theory and in social science. “The narrative-tradition” has lately been influential on the debate in social science generally (Sarbin 1986, Chambers 1984) and in educational research specifically (Eisner & Peshkin 1990, Eisner 1992). The theme is wide drawing on literature and a vast body of discourse from the field of social science. I will try to bring some central points into focus. The Russian Formalists were the first to state that the study of all stories, every meaningful text, was possible with the aid of the distinction between fabula and susjett (Shklovsky 1969 p245). In English the distinction was translated to story and discourse. (Culler 1981) Story is a “sequence of actions or events, conceived as independent of their manifestations”. Discourse on the other hand is “the discursive presentation or narration of events.”(p169) As Culler (1981 p187) has pointed out the distinction between story and discourse is a tricky one. On the one hand the analysis of story/fabula is founded on a common sense assumption that the events or actions logically and temporally exists before their presentation in the discourse/susjett. Analysis of discourse on the other hand has demonstrated that the narrated events or the actions of the narrative quite often are the product of discursive forces. They seem to be constructions supporting demands from the discourse. The one who selects and describes events or actions is under the influence of a discursive idea. This makes an impact on both the selection and description. Discourse/susjett is activated both earlier in the process and activated differently from what one first believed to be true. This means that neither the analysis of discourse/susjett nor story/fabula are standing for themselves.
Recommended publications
  • PL205 the Gaze Course Description Texts Requirements
    Fall 2021 PL205 The Gaze Instructor: Prof. Dr. Katalin Makkai Email: [email protected] Office hours: By appointment This course is an OSUN network online course and will take place via Zoom. Course description This course explores a range of ways in which human relationships—with each other, with society at large, with the world in which we live—have been conceived as structured in terms of a “gaze” or “look”. We begin with the idea of the human being as (in part) constituted by a need, or desire, for recognition in the eyes of another. We then turn to consider analyses and critiques of modern Western society as based on a pernicious culture of seeing, drawing from work in philosophy, cultural criticism, feminist theory, psychoanalysis, film, and fiction. Texts All readings will be provided during the semester electronically. We will be examining readings closely during class. To make the most of the online format, please print the readings out before class, or have them available on a device different from the one you use to join class. This will help to build a sense of community, because then we’ll all know that you are looking at us, and not a PDF, when you are looking at your screen. Requirements ATTENDANCE Attendance at all classes is a crucial part of the education offered by Bard College Berlin. To account for minor circumstances, two absences will not affect the participation grade or require documentation. Any further absences should be discussed with the instructor. Bard College Berlin does not offer credit for any course in which a student has missed more than 30% of classes, regardless of the reasons for the absences.
    [Show full text]
  • Ruth Prawer Jhabvala's Adapted Screenplays
    Absorbing the Worlds of Others: Ruth Prawer Jhabvala’s Adapted Screenplays By Laura Fryer Submitted in fulfilment of the requirements of a PhD degree at De Montfort University, Leicester. Funded by Midlands 3 Cities and the Arts and Humanities Research Council. June 2020 i Abstract Despite being a prolific and well-decorated adapter and screenwriter, the screenplays of Ruth Prawer Jhabvala are largely overlooked in adaptation studies. This is likely, in part, because her life and career are characterised by the paradox of being an outsider on the inside: whether that be as a European writing in and about India, as a novelist in film or as a woman in industry. The aims of this thesis are threefold: to explore the reasons behind her neglect in criticism, to uncover her contributions to the film adaptations she worked on and to draw together the fields of screenwriting and adaptation studies. Surveying both existing academic studies in film history, screenwriting and adaptation in Chapter 1 -- as well as publicity materials in Chapter 2 -- reveals that screenwriting in general is on the periphery of considerations of film authorship. In Chapter 2, I employ Sandra Gilbert’s and Susan Gubar’s notions of ‘the madwoman in the attic’ and ‘the angel in the house’ to portrayals of screenwriters, arguing that Jhabvala purposely cultivates an impression of herself as the latter -- a submissive screenwriter, of no threat to patriarchal or directorial power -- to protect herself from any negative attention as the former. However, the archival materials examined in Chapter 3 which include screenplay drafts, reveal her to have made significant contributions to problem-solving, characterisation and tone.
    [Show full text]
  • Material Pleasures: the Still Life in the Fiction of AS Byatt
    University of Wollongong Research Online University of Wollongong Thesis Collection University of Wollongong Thesis Collections 2009 Material pleasures: the still life in the fiction of A. S. Byatt Elizabeth Hicks University of Wollongong Recommended Citation Hicks, Elizabeth, Material pleasures: the still life in the fiction of A. S. Byatt, Doctor of Philosophy thesis, , University of Wollongong, 2009. http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3546 Research Online is the open access institutional repository for the University of Wollongong. For further information contact Manager Repository Services: [email protected]. MATERIAL PLEASURES: The Still Life in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt There are . things made with hands . that live a life different from ours, that live longer than we do, and cross our lives in stories . (Byatt, A. S. “The Djinn in the Nightingale’s Eye” 277) Elizabeth Hicks ABSTRACT This thesis explores the ways in which English writer A. S. (Antonia) Byatt’s veneration of both realism and writing informs her use of ekphrasis, investigating the prominence of the still life in her fictional output to 2009. In doing so it distinguishes between visual still lifes (descriptions of real or imagined artworks) and what are termed for the purposes of the study ‘verbal still lifes’ (scenes such as laid tables, rooms and market stalls). This is the first full-length examination of Byatt’s adoption of the Barthesian concept of textual pleasure, demonstrating how her ekphrastic descriptions involve consumption and take time to unfold for the reader, thereby elevating domesticity and highlighting the limitations of painting. In locating what may be termed a ‘Byattian’ aesthetic, this study combines several areas of scholarship, particularly literary criticism of Byatt and others, food writing, and feminist and postmodernist criticism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Still Life in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt
    The Still Life in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt The Still Life in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt By Elizabeth Hicks The Still Life in the Fiction of A. S. Byatt, by Elizabeth Hicks This book first published 2010 Cambridge Scholars Publishing 12 Back Chapman Street, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2XX, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2010 by Elizabeth Hicks All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-4438-2385-6, ISBN (13): 978-1-4438-2385-2 There are . things made with hands . that live a life different from ours, that live longer than we do, and cross our lives in stories . —Byatt, A. S. “The Djinn in the Nightingale’s Eye” 277 TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Artworks ......................................................................................... ix Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 The Still Life and Ekphrasis Previous Scholarship Chapter One............................................................................................... 37 Aesthetic Pleasure The Proustian Vision The Pre-Raphaelite Influence The Life of Art Chapter Two .............................................................................................. 83 Postmodern
    [Show full text]
  • King's Research Portal
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by King's Research Portal King’s Research Portal Document Version Peer reviewed version Link to publication record in King's Research Portal Citation for published version (APA): Hutton, A. N. (2016). Literature, Criticism, and Politics in the Early New Left, 1956–62. Twentieth Century British History, 27(1), 51-75. Citing this paper Please note that where the full-text provided on King's Research Portal is the Author Accepted Manuscript or Post-Print version this may differ from the final Published version. If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the Research Portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognize and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. •Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the Research Portal for the purpose of private study or research. •You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain •You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the Research Portal Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
    [Show full text]
  • John Currin: Reflections on Contemporary Society
    CUJAH MENU John Currin: Reflections on Contemporary Society David Morris In this essay, I will look at the paintings of the contemporary American painter John Currin. I will examine his oeuvre and attempt to illustrate his portrayal of beauty, gender roles, and behaviour as something not innate, but socially con- structed. To do this, I will make a case for Currin’s paintings of middle-aged women as an expression and refection of the dominant cultural views of women of this age. In addition to his portrayals of women, I will look at his representation of homosexuality. I will also discuss the interaction between cul- tural relativity and the construction of both beauty and gender. Currin’s style harkens back to the time of the so-called geniuses of the Italian Renaissance and Baroque periods. Currin acknowledges that his “… guiltiest pleasure is that [he] really like[s] high culture. [He] really like[s] old painting” [1]. However, unlike the artists of the Renaissance that he admires, Currin’s work does not have a specifc type of beauty, an ideal beauty that he creates again and again, as can be seen in the oeuvres of Botticelli and Leonardo. Currin ex- aggerates the proportions of the female body and sometimes renders it with a heavily painted face to illustrate how beauty is a construction of society. This is perhaps due to the fact that he lives in a postmodern society, where grand-nar- ratives and the belief in ideals have been, for the most part, rejected. In today’s postmodern society, a culturally relative understanding of beauty carries a lot of weight, much more than the ideal beauties that Renaissance artists sought to depict.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Theurevolutionary Gesture": Nadine Gordimer,]. M
    Making the uRevolutionary Gesture": Nadine Gordimer,]. M. Coetzee and Some Variations on the Writer s Responsibility KELLY HEWSON T AHE OLD ISSUE CONCERNING the nature of the writer's respon• sibility, taken up most famously by Jean-Paul Sartre in What is Literature? and more recently by Roland Barthes in Writing Degree Zero, has been re-opened with a new urgency in this decade, and the questions that arise from it are questions that agitate a number of contemporary writers. Nadine Gordimer is one such writer. In "The Essential Gesture," an essay she titles with a phrase from Barthes' Writing Degree Zero, Gordimer undertakes to answer the question of the writer's responsibility as it pertains to her historical situation.1 Understanding along with Barthes that a writer's choice always faces in two directions — toward society and toward the literature — Gordimer wrestles with the problem of how to reconcile those demands from without to be socially responsible with those demands from within concerning artistic integrity.2 She makes it clear that the problem is a particularly complicated one when the society one is writing in is South Africa.3 For living in South Africa, as Gordimer describes it in another essay, is "living in the interregnum" — in "the space between two social orders and two identities, the one known and discarded, the other unknown and undetermined."4 In this precarious situation, the question of the writer's responsibility becomes even more vex• ing. For how, as a writer, does one put oneself into a meaningful relationship with a society that is not yet born? Clearly, in the interregnum that characterizes South Africa, there arise, both 56 KELLY HEWSON from without and within, different sets of demands for black and for white writers.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.THE BODY of HURT in MARGARET ATWOOD's NOVEL BODILY HARM
    Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies E-ISSN: 2175-8026 [email protected] Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Brasil Cykman, Avital G. THE BODY OF HURT IN MARGARET ATWOOD’S NOVEL BODILY HARM Ilha do Desterro: A Journal of English Language, Literatures in English and Cultural Studies, vol. 68, núm. 2, mayo-agosto, 2015, pp. 57-66 Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Florianópolis, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=478347658005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative DOI: 10.5007/2175-8026.2015v68n2p57 THE BODY OF HURT IN MARGARET ATWOOD’S NOVEL BODILY HARM Avital G.Cykman* Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina Florianópolis, SC, BR Abstract h is article analyses Margaret Atwood’s novel Bodily Harm (1981) in regard to its exploration of the link between corporeality and contextuality, focusing on the relation between the historical and socio-cultural context in which identity is constructed and the female character’s perception of body and self. h e study approaches the character’s retrospective journey as a basis for a deconstruction of the character’s values, behavior, relationships, and discomfort with the body, revealing the power relations and social causes related to her present situation. h e study focuses on the literary articulation of the problems of being female, the exploration of the relation between the biological body and the cultural concept of the body, and the criticism of social representations of women.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiction Award Winners 2019
    1989: Spartina by John Casey 2016: The Sympathizer by Viet Thanh Nguyen National Book 1988: Paris Trout by Pete Dexter 2015: All the Light We Cannot See by A. Doerr 1987: Paco’s Story by Larry Heinemann 2014: The Goldfinch by Donna Tartt Award 1986: World’s Fair by E. L. Doctorow 2013: Orphan Master’s Son by Adam Johnson 1985: White Noise by Don DeLillo 2012: No prize awarded 2011: A Visit from the Goon Squad “Established in 1950, the National Book Award is an 1984: Victory Over Japan by Ellen Gilchrist by Jennifer Egan American literary prize administered by the National 1983: The Color Purple by Alice Walker 2010: Tinkers by Paul Harding Book Foundation, a nonprofit organization.” 1982: Rabbit Is Rich by John Updike 2009: Olive Kitteridge by Elizabeth Strout - from the National Book Foundation website. 1980: Sophie’s Choice by William Styron 2008: The Brief Wondrous Life of Oscar Wao 1979: Going After Cacciato by Tim O’Brien by Junot Diaz 2018: The Friend by Sigrid Nunez 1978: Blood Tie by Mary Lee Settle 2007: The Road by Cormac McCarthy 2017: Sing, Unburied, Sing by Jesmyn Ward 1977: The Spectator Bird by Wallace Stegner 2006: March by Geraldine Brooks 2016: The Underground Railroad by Colson 1976: J.R. by William Gaddis 2005: Gilead by Marilynne Robinson Whitehead 1975: Dog Soldiers by Robert Stone 2004: The Known World by Edward P. Jones 2015: Fortune Smiles by Adam Johnson The Hair of Harold Roux 2003: Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides 2014: Redeployment by Phil Klay by Thomas Williams 2002: Empire Falls by Richard Russo 2013: Good Lord Bird by James McBride 1974: Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon 2001: The Amazing Adventures of 2012: Round House by Louise Erdrich 1973: Chimera by John Barth Kavalier and Clay by Michael Chabon 2011: Salvage the Bones by Jesmyn Ward 1972: The Complete Stories 2000: Interpreter of Maladies by Jhumpa Lahiri 2010: Lord of Misrule by Jaimy Gordon by Flannery O’Connor 1999: The Hours by Michael Cunningham 2009: Let the Great World Spin by Colum McCann 1971: Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • Berger: Ways of Seeing
    Studies in Visual Communication Volume 5 Issue 2 Spring 1979 Article 10 1978 Berger: Ways of Seeing George F. Custen University of Pennsylvania Recommended Citation Custen, G. F. (1979). Berger: Ways of Seeing. 5 (2), 144-148. Retrieved from https://repository.upenn.edu/ svc/vol5/iss2/10 This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol5/iss2/10 For more information, please contact [email protected]. Berger: Ways of Seeing This reviews and discussion is available in Studies in Visual Communication: https://repository.upenn.edu/svc/vol5/ iss2/10 Ways of Seeing, a book made by John Berger, Sven Berger's forays, for the most part, a·re centered on a Blomberg, Chris Fox, Michael Dibb, and Richard special kind of image, the oil painting. He attempts to Hollis. New York and London: British Broadcasting investigate the effects that mass reproduction has had Corporation and Penguin Books, 1972. 160 pp., on the social uses of these images. His basic conten­ photographs. $7.95 (cloth), $2.50 (paper). tion is: "Today we see the art of the past as nobody saw it before. We actually perceive it in a different Ways of Seeing, four programs produced by BBC-TV, way (p. 16)." Using the now familiar argument that the 1972. Sale: $1170 for set (16mm), $820 for set various "ways of seeing" what have been manufac­ (video); Rental: $325 for set (16mm), $230 for set tured as images has always been based on the cultural (video), $120 each (16mm), $35 each (video), from conventions dominant at particular times, he goes Time-Life Multimedia.
    [Show full text]
  • Archive Fever and the Genesis of Secrecy in Salman Rushdie
    Vijay Mishra Archive fever and the genesis of secrecy in Salman Rushdie This paper examines the Salman Rushdie papers deposited in the Robert W Woodruff Library [Manuscript, Archives and Rare Books Library] of Emory University. Although at first glance this is by and large an old fashioned archive (of 215 boxes and 55 oversized papers), it is also a digital archive in the sense that much of the author’s drafts, letters and sundry material are preserved in computers. The archive has managed to preserve the hard disks in their original form by simulating and incorpor- ating these disks into a PC. The paper examines how the Rushdie archive has been catalogued and what a researcher trained in research methods and textual criticism may do with the archive. Its theoretical template comes from Derrida’s short monograph Archive Fever as it reads the Rushdie archive as a repository as well as a ‘consignment’ which exists within certain laws and power structures. To explore an archive’s concealed or repressed items, the paper carefully traces Rushdie’s interest in the Islamic genesis of secrecy with reference to the available holograph notes and related material on the ‘satanic verses’ in the archive. Keywords textual criticism; archives; Salman Rushdie; Derrida Textual Practice Life, he himself said once, (his biografiend, in fact, kills him very- soon, if yet not, after) is a wake, livit or krikit, and on the bunk of our breadwinning lies the cropse of our seedfather, a phrase which the establisher of the world by law might pretinately write across the chestfront of all manorwombanborn.
    [Show full text]
  • Fiction Winners
    1984: Victory Over Japan by Ellen Gilchrist 2005: Gilead by Marilynne Robinson National Book Award 1983: The Color Purple by Alice Walker 2004: The Known World 1982: Rabbit Is Rich by John Updike by Edward P. Jones 1980: Sophie’s Choice by William Styron 2003: Middlesex by Jeffrey Eugenides 2015: Fortune Smiles by Adam Johnson 2014: Redeployment by Phil Klay 1979: Going After Cacciato by Tim O’Brien 2002: Empire Falls by Richard Russo 2013: Good Lord Bird by James McBride 1978: Blood Tie by Mary Lee Settle 2001: The Amazing Adventures of 1977: The Spectator Bird by Wallace Stegner 2012: Round House by Louise Erdrich Kavalier and Clay 2011: Salvage the Bones by Jesmyn Ward 1976: J.R. by William Gaddis by Michael Chabon 1975: Dog Soldiers by Robert Stone 2000: Interpreter of Maladies 2010: Lord of Misrule by Jaimy Gordon 2009: Let the Great World Spin The Hair of Harold Roux by Jhumpa Lahiri by Colum McCann by Thomas Williams 1999: The Hours by Michael Cunningham 1974: Gravity’s Rainbow by Thomas Pynchon 1998: American Pastoral by Philip Roth 2008: Shadow Country by Peter Matthiessen 1973: Chimera by John Barth 1997: Martin Dressler: The Tale of an 1972: The Complete Stories 2007: Tree of Smoke by Denis Johnson American Dreamer 2006: The Echo Maker by Richard Powers by Flannery O’Connor by Steven Millhauser 1971: Mr. Sammler’s Planet by Saul Bellow 1996: Independence Day by Richard Ford 2005: Europe Central by William T. Volmann 1970: Them by Joyce Carol Oates 1995: The Stone Diaries by Carol Shields 2004: The News from Paraguay 1969: Steps
    [Show full text]