Forest Research Laboratory Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Forest Research Laboratory College of Forestry I Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon March, 1992 I I 'i I MECHANIZED HARVESTING: I A COMPENDIUM OF RESEARCH I I I compiled by I Loren Kellogg 1 Pete Bettinger Steve Robe I Alan Steffert I 1 I 1 1 I Forest Research Laboratory I College of Forestry Oregon State University 1 March, 1992 U I CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES INTRODUCTION..............................................1 FOCUS OF THE COMPENDIUM.....................................2 OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE......................................2 Ground-based Harvesting .......................................3 Machine studies.......................................3 System studies........................................3 Cable-based Harvesting.......................................6 Conclusion..............................................7 LITERATURE CITED............................................9 Sources of Information about Harvest Productivity........................9 HOW TO USE THIS COMPENDIUM.................................11 Organization of the Compendium................................11 Studies of individual machines.............................11 System studies........................................13 Format for presentation of information........................13 Other Uses of the Compendium.................................14 HIERARCHY I: MECHANIZED HARVESTING IN CLEARCUTS...............15 Pathways Chart for Locating Abstracts.............................15 Citation Abstracts.........................................35 HIERARCHY II: MECHANIZED HARVESTING IN PARTIAL CUTS............285 Pathways Chart for Locating Abstracts............................285 Citation Abstracts........................................305 APPENDIX A: DEFINITIONS AND ILLUSTRATIONS OF TYPICAL MACHINERY.................................390 APPENDIX B: TABLE OF EQUIVALENTS............................399 11 I I LIST OF TABLES Page I 1. Studies of ground-based machines used in clearcuts .4 1 2. Studies of ground-based machines used in partial cuts........................5 3. Studies of cable-based machines used in clearcuts..........................8 I I I I I 1 I I I Li I I I IiiiI I INTRODUCTION Interest in techniques of mechanized harvesting in the Pacific Northwest region of I the United States has increased, because the cost of labor is high and piece sizes are decreasing as second growth harvesting increases. Stands in the 30- to 80-year range of age classes with average diameters of less than 20 inches at breast height are an I increasingly important part of the timber supply. This changing stand structure raises the need for research aimed at determining cost-effective and environmentally sound Imethods for handling small timber. Greater understanding of the productivity possible with mechanized harvesting equipment under conditions found in the Pacific Northwest will encourage appropriate I developments in mechanized harvesting operations. Computer-based analysis of harvesting systems is one method of gaining this understanding. Computer simulation can be a powerful tool for decision making if properly applied, and simulation can I expand analysis of field studies to delineate areas where additional information is needed. The effectiveness of computer simulation, however, is dependent on the quality of I the input data. Mechanized harvesting in the Pacific Northwest is relatively new, and many of the conventional aspects of harvesting have not been well documented with studies of production. Krause (1988) evaluated several mechanized harvesting I simulation models and found a lack of production data for ground-based harvesting equipment in the Northwest. He attributed this lapse to the short history of mechanized harvesting in the region. No centralized data base, moreover, has yet been compiled for I this subject. Only time and additional field studies can make up for the general lack of I information, but the issue of a centralized data base can be addressed with a compendium of studies about the productivity of mechanized harvesting. This centralized and organized data base will indicate areas that require additional information and help harvesting professionals make decisions and run simulations. The purpose of this I compendium, therefore, is to supply an organized collection of productivity information about mechanized harvesting, and to identify gaps in the literature that delineate areas Iwhereadditional research is needed. I LI I I I I FOCUS OF THE COMPENDIUM This compendium primarily focuses on mechanized harvesting operations thatare appropriate to the Pacific Northwest region of the United States. Mechanized harvesting operations, for the purposes of this compendium, are: Operations with at least one single or multi-function machine for manufacturing (felling, delimbing, bucking or chipping), or operations where treesor logs are placed in bunches prior to primary transport, or operations where primary transportation is able to handle multiple stems. This compendium also focuses on productivity, operations analysis, equipment performance, and cost factors. Studies of mechanized harvesting performed in other regions of the United States or in other countries are included in the compendium if the terrain and stand conditions are characteristic of conditions found in the Pacific Northwest. Typical examples of sites with small timber located on terrain suitable for mechanized harvesting can be found on both the East and West sides of the Cascade Range. A conmion type of small timber found East of the Cascades would bean 85- year-old stand of lodgepole pine with 1,200 to 1,500 trees per acre and an average diameter of 8 to 9 inches at breast height. Stand conditions for thinning operationson the West side are typified by a 40-year-old stand of Douglas-fir and hemlock with 300 to 400 trees per acre and an average diameter of 11 to 13 inches at breast height. Stand conditions on the West side, where appropriate for clearcut operations, are characterized by a stand of 65-year-old Douglas-fir and hemlock with 100 to 200 trees peracre and an average diameter of 16 to 26 inches at breast height. A compendium of productivity information about cable yarding is already available (Aubuchon, 1982); therefore, conventional productivity information relatingto cable yarding will, for the most part, be excluded from this compendium. Productivity information on grapple-yarding operations and on cable-yarding operations in conjunction with another mechanized process, however, is included in this compendium. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE In the Pacific Northwest, harvesting activities rapidly are shifting from old- growth stands to young-growth stands. In Oregon, the average diameter oftrees harvested will decline from about 21 inches in the decade 1991-2000 to 17 inches in the decade 2041-2050 (Sessions, 1991). The decline in average diameter of harvestedtrees, however, is projected to vary by landowner. Average diameter of trees harvested from National Forest land will decline very little from 1991 to 2020, whileaverage diameter from harvests on BLM land will decline from 25 inches in the decade 1991-2000to 17 inches in the decade 202 1-2030. Average diameter from harvestson State land are projected to decline slowly from 20 inches to between 17 and 18 inches from 1991to 2090, while average diameter from harvests on private land will slowly decline from17 to 16 inches during the same period. Harvesting costs per unit-volume on these small- diameter forests will be higher than with old-growth forests. I Ground-based Harvesting Small tiees growing on tenn with slopes of less than 30 percent are harvested in I the Pacific Northwest in the same manner as they are harvested in the rest of North America. Typical harvesting systems for these areas consist of feller-bunchers used in conjunction with grapple skidders. Processing at the landing varies with markets in the I area, and it may include mechanized delimbing and whole-tree chipping (Johnson, 1981). IMachine studies ClearcuttingTable 1 shows that ground-based clearcutting of small- and medium-sized timber on gentle terrain has been extensively studied. Hierarchy I of this I compendium (Mechanized Harvesting in Clearcuts) includes 146 machine studies that fall within these categories. These studies include 69 in the felling category, 51 in the processing category, 17 in the primary transport category, 8 in the loading category, and I 1 in the bunching category. Table 1, however, shows that as tree size becomes larger and slopes become I steeper, the number of ground-based machine studies rapidly decreases. Only 16 machine studies that cover operations on medium and steep slopes with possible combinations of timber size are included in the compendium. Eight of these 16 studies I are concerned with felling operations on medium and steep slopes in small and medium timber. The remaining studies fall within the categories of bunching, primary transport, processing, and loading. I The decrease in the number of studies with larger tree size and steeper slopes was expected, because few ground-based machines have been developed that are capable of harvesting larger timber on steeper slopes. The abundance of information about ground- I based harvesting of small and medium timber on gentle slopes and the relative lack of information concerning ground-based harvesting of larger timber on steeper slopes, however, suggests that further research efforts should focus on these areas. I Partial cuttingTable 2