Update on Office-Based Strategies for the Management of Obesity MICHAEL ERLANDSON, MD; LAURIE C

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Update on Office-Based Strategies for the Management of Obesity MICHAEL ERLANDSON, MD; LAURIE C Editor’s Note: On February 13, 2020, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requested that the manufacturer of Belviq (lorcaserin) voluntarily withdraw this drug from the market because a safety clinical trial showed an increased occur- rence of cancer that outweighed any potential weight loss benefits. See the FDA Drug Safety Communication (https://www. fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-requests-withdrawal-weight-loss-drug-belviq-belviq-xr-lorcaserin-market). Update on Office-Based Strategies for the Management of Obesity MICHAEL ERLANDSON, MD; LAURIE C. IVEY, PsyD; and KATIE SEIKEL, DO, RD Swedish Family Medicine Residency, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Littleton, Colorado Obesity is a common condition that is associated with numerous medical problems such as car- diovascular disease, pulmonary disease, and diabetes mellitus. Primary care physicians have an important role in helping patients develop a successful weight loss plan to improve their overall health. Dietary strategies emphasizing reduced caloric intake, regardless of the nutrient compo- sition, are important for weight loss. Behavioral interventions such as motivational interviewing and encouraging physical activity lead to additional weight loss when combined with dietary changes. Medication regimens for concomitant medical problems should take into account the effect of specific agents on the patient’s weight. Persons with a body mass index of 30 kg per m2 or greater or 27 kg per m2 or greater with comorbidities who do not succeed in losing weight with diet and activity modifications may consider medication to assist with weight loss. Medica- tions approved for long-term treatment of obesity include orlistat, lorcaserin, liraglutide, phen- termine/topiramate, and naltrexone/bupropion. Physicians should consider referring patients for bariatric surgery if they have a body mass index of 40 kg per m2 or greater. For those with obesity-related comorbid conditions, patients should be considered for adjustable gastric band- ing or other bariatric surgical approaches if they have a body mass index of 30 to 39.9 kg per m2. The most commonly performed procedures for weight loss are Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy, and adjustable gastric banding. Bariatric surgery is the most effective intervention for weight loss in obese patients, and it leads to improvement in multiple obesity-related condi- tions, including remission of diabetes. (Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(5):361-368. Copyright © 2016 American Academy of Family Physicians.) CME This clinical content besity is a pervasive problem EVIDENCE SUMMARY conforms to AAFP criteria confronting patients and their The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force for continuing medical edu- cation (CME). See CME Quiz physicians. From 2011 to 2012, (USPSTF) recommends that all persons Questions on page 346. 69% of U.S. adults were over- 18 years and older be screened for obesity Oweight or obese.1 Many common medical (Table 1 1,3), and that those with a BMI of Author disclosure: No rel- 2 evant financial affiliations. problems, such as diabetes mellitus, pul- 30 kg per m or greater be offered intensive, 2 ▲ monary disease, and cardiovascular disease, multicomponent behavioral interventions. Patient information: A handout on this topic is are related to obesity and can improve with The American Academy of Family Physi- available at http://www. weight loss.2 The management of obesity cians recommends screening for obesity aafp.org/afp/2016/0901/ continues to evolve with the approval of new followed by intensive counseling and behav- p361-s1.html. treatments. This review will provide answers ioral interventions, with at least one session Scan the QR code below to some of the common clinical questions per month for at least three months.4 Waist with your mobile device that physicians encounter when managing circumference may be an acceptable alterna- for easy access to the patient information hand- obesity in the outpatient setting. tive in some persons because BMI may not out on the AFP mobile site. account for the cardiovascular risk of cen- What Is the Family Physician’s Role in tral adiposity. Family physicians can assist Screening for and Managing Obesity? patients in setting weight loss goals, improv- Physicians should screen all patients for obesity ing nutrition, increasing physical activity, with measurement of body mass index (BMI) addressing barriers to change, and develop- or waist circumference. Diet and behavioral ing strategies to maintain long-term life- interventions should be initiated in patients style changes. Behavior modifications can who are obese. lead to clinically important weight loss of SeptemberDownloaded 1, from 2016 the ◆ American Volume Family 94, Number Physician 5 website at www.aafp.org/afp.www.aafp.org/afp Copyright © 2016 American Academy of FamilyAmerican Physicians. Family For the Physician private, noncom 361- mercial use of one individual user of the website. All other rights reserved. Contact [email protected] for copyright questions and/or permission requests. Obesity SORT: KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR PRACTICE Evidence Clinical recommendation rating References BMI should be calculated for all patients 18 years and older, and those with obesity should be referred for B 2 intensive, multicomponent behavioral interventions. Increased physical activity should be recommended for weight loss in combination with diet and behavioral B 20 modifications. Physicians should consider medications for weight loss in patients with a BMI of 30 kg per m2 or greater, C 26 or 27 kg per m2 or greater who also have comorbidities and have unsuccessfully tried diet and lifestyle modification first. Patients with a BMI of 40 kg per m2 or greater and those with a BMI greater than 35 kg per m2 who also have B 36 obesity-related comorbidities should be referred for consideration of bariatric surgery. Patients with a BMI greater than 30 kg per m2 who also have obesity-related comorbidities may be candidates for adjustable gastric banding. BMI = body mass index. A = consistent, good-quality patient-oriented evidence; B = inconsistent or limited-quality patient-oriented evidence; C = consensus, disease-oriented evidence, usual practice, expert opinion, or case series. For information about the SORT evidence rating system, go to http://www.aafp.org/afpsort. 5%, improved glucose tolerance, and reduction in other EVIDENCE SUMMARY cardiovascular risk factors.2 Various commonly used diet plans result in a similar degree of weight loss, regardless of the specific dietary Which Dietary Approaches Have Been Shown composition of macronutrients (carbohydrate, protein, to Be Most Effective for Weight Loss? and fat).5 Adherence to calorie reduction is the most Adherence to a diet with a deficit of 500 kcal per day, important factor; any diet in which caloric intake is less regardless of macronutrient composition, is most effective than caloric expenditure will lead to weight loss.6 A defi- for weight loss. Simple and realistic diet modifications have cit of at least 500 kcal per day can be achieved with intake the highest likelihood of success. of 1,200 to 1,500 kcal for women and 1,500 to 1,800 kcal for men. Very low-calorie diets (800 kcal or less per day) should be avoided unless the patient is under close supervision with high-intensity lifestyle interventions.7 Table 1. Weight Classifications Diet plans with multiple components can be over- whelming and lead to poor adherence. A simpler Body mass approach using a single dietary adjustment may pro- index (kg Prevalence Waist Classification per m 2) (%) circumference duce weight loss similar to more complex plans. For example, encouraging a patient to increase dietary fiber Underweight < 18.5 NA — intake produces comparable adherence and weight loss Normal weight 18.5 to 24.9 NA Male < 40 in to encouraging compliance with the many goals of (102 cm) the American Heart Association diet. Similarly, more Female < 35 in permissive goals, such as adding more vegetables and (89 cm) standing more, lead to greater improvement in life- Overweight 25 to 29.9 33.6 — Class 1 obesity 30 to 34.9 20.4 Male ≥ 40 in Class 2 obesity 35 to 39.9 8.1 Female ≥ 35 in WHAT IS NEW ON THIS TOPIC: OBESITY Class 3 obesity ≥ 40 6.4 Using a single dietary adjustment may produce weight loss similar to more complex plans. For example, encouraging a NA = not available. patient to increase dietary fiber intake produces comparable adherence and weight loss to encouraging compliance with Information from references 1 and 3. the many goals of the American Heart Association diet. 362 American Family Physician www.aafp.org/afp Volume 94, Number 5 ◆ September 1, 2016 Obesity style behaviors than restrictive approaches that instruct to empower them in the process (Table 2).11,12 Multiple patients to avoid certain foods.8 Although different studies have shown that motivational interviewing can diets with similar caloric intake can result in compa- modestly enhance the effects of a weight-loss program rable weight loss, a higher-quality diet of nutrient-dense (–3.3 lb [–1.5 kg]; 95% confidence interval [CI], –4.4 to foods (e.g., vegetables, fruits, whole grains) that are rich –2.0 lb [–2.0 to –0.9 kg]), and it can be readily used by in fiber, vitamins, and minerals will produce greater primary care physicians.13 This technique can also indi- results.9 The 2015-2020 Dietary Guidelines for Ameri- rectly have beneficial effects on other cardiovascular risk cans reinforce the need to make
Recommended publications
  • Weight Management Guideline: Children and Adolescents
    Weight Management in Children and Adolescents Screening and Intervention Guideline Prevention ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Nutrition ........................................................................................................................................ 2 Healthy eating behaviors .............................................................................................................. 2 Physical activity ............................................................................................................................ 3 Screening ......................................................................................................................................... 3 Diagnosis.......................................................................................................................................... 3 Interventions ..................................................................................................................................... 4 Goals ............................................................................................................................................ 4 Strategies to help with weight loss ............................................................................................... 5 Behavior change counseling using the 5A approach ................................................................... 5 Lifestyle modifications .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Weight Management Screening and Intervention Guideline
    Weight Management Screening and Intervention Guideline Summary of Changes as of August 2018 ..................................................................................................... 2 Background ................................................................................................................................................... 2 Screening ...................................................................................................................................................... 2 Diagnosis....................................................................................................................................................... 3 Weight Goals ................................................................................................................................................. 4 Interventions .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Behavior change counseling .................................................................................................................. 5 Lifestyle modification resources ............................................................................................................. 6 Diets and commercial weight-loss programs .......................................................................................... 6 Bariatric surgery.....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Policy: Bariatric Surgery Reference Number: NH
    Clinical Policy: Bariatric Surgery Reference Number: NH. CP.MP.37 Coding Implications Effective Date: 06/09 Revision Log Last Review Date: 04/18 See Important Reminder at the end of this policy for important regulatory and legal information. Description There are two categories of bariatric surgery: restrictive procedures and malabsorptive procedures. Gastric restrictive procedures include procedures where a small pouch is created in the stomach to restrict the amount of food that can be eaten, resulting in weight loss. The laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) are examples of restrictive procedures. Malabsorptive procedures bypass portions of the stomach and intestines causing incomplete digestion and absorption of food. Duodenal switch is an example of a malabsorptive procedure. Roux-en-y gastric bypass (RYGB), biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD-DS), and biliopancreatic diversion with gastric reduction duodenal switch (BPD-GRDS) are examples of restrictive and malabsorptive procedures. LAGB devices are currently not FDA approved for adolescents less than 18 years, but an industry- sponsored prospective study is in progress, and numerous retrospective studies of adolescents have been published with favorable results. Policy/Criteria It is the policy of NH Healthy Families that the bariatric surgery procedures LAGB, LSG, and laparoscopic RYGB for adolescents and adults and laparoscopic BPD-DS/BPD-GRDS for adults are medically necessary when meeting the following criteria under section I through III: I. Participating providers that are MBSAQIP (Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program for the American College of Surgeons) accredited have demonstrated a commitment to excellence in ethics, quality and patient care.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Practice Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pediatric
    Guideline Korean J Pediatr 2019;62(1):3­21 Korean J Pediatr 2019;62(1):3-21 https://doi.org/10.3345/kjp.2018.07360 pISSN 1738­1061•eISSN 2092­7258 Korean J Pediatr Clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric obesity: recommen­ dations from the Committee on Pediatric Obe­ sity of the Korean Society of Pediatric Gastro­ enterology Hepatology and Nutrition Dae Yong Yi, MD, PhD1, Soon Chul Kim, MD, PhD2, Ji Hyuk Lee, MD, PhD3, Eun Hye Lee, MD4, Jae Young Kim, MD, PhD5, Yong Joo Kim, MD, PhD6, Ki Soo Kang, MD, PhD7, Jeana Hong, MD, PhD8, Jung Ok Shim, MD, PhD9, Yoon Lee, MD10, Ben Kang, MD11, Yeoun Joo Lee, MD, PhD12, Mi Jin Kim, MD, PhD13, Jin Soo Moon, MD, PhD14, Hong Koh, MD, PhD15, JeongAe You, PhD16, Young-Sook Kwak, MD, PhD17, Hyunjung Lim, PhD18, Hye Ran Yang, MD, PhD19 1Department of Pediatrics, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Chung-Ang University Hospital, Seoul, 2Department of Pediatrics, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Hospital, Jeonju, 3Department of Pediatrics, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Chungju, 4Department of Pediatrics, Eulji University School of Medicine, Nowon Eulji Medical Hospital, Seoul, 5Department of Pediatrics, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Changwon, 6Department of Pediatrics, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, 7Department of Pediatrics, Jeju National University Hospital, Jeju, 8Department of Pediatrics, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, 9Department of Pediatrics, Korea University Guro
    [Show full text]
  • Obesity (Full Version) 1
    WGO Global Guideline Obesity (full version) 1 World Gastroenterology Organisation Global Guideline Obesity Review team: Lisbeth Mathus-Vliegen (co-chair) (The Netherlands) James Toouli (co-chair) (Australia) Michael Fried (Switzerland) Aamir Ghafoor Khan (Pakistan) James Garisch (South Africa) Richard Hunt (Canada) Suleiman Fedail (Sudan) Davor Štimac (Croatia) Ton Lemair (Netherlands) Justus Krabshuis (France) External experts: Pedro Kaufmann (Uruguay) Eve Roberts (Canada) Gabriele Riccardi (Italy) Contents 1 General aspects 2 Management of obesity 3 Obesity in the elderly 4 Cascades 5 Appendices and evidence © World Gastroenterology Organisation, 2011 WGO Global Guideline Obesity (full version) 2 1 General aspects 1.1 Definitions • Body mass index (BMI): weight (in kilograms) divided by the square of the individual’s height (in meters). • The International Obesity Task Force (IOTF) definition of obesity (based on Caucasians with a “Western” lifestyle) sets cut-off points of 25 kg/m2 for adult excess weight and 30 kg/m2 for obesity. These BMI cut-off points are considered to have a more international basis than other definitions. • The BMI index ranges for children and teenagers should take the normal differences in body fat between boys and girls and differences in body fat at various ages into account: U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) definition: — BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age = “overweight” — BMI between the 85th and 95th percentiles = “at risk of overweight” European Childhood Obesity Group classification: — BMI ≥ 85th percentile for age = “overweight” — BMI ≥ 95th percentile for age = “obesity” 1.2 Key management points • Diet and lifestyle modification, with or without medications, is the first step; if this fails, then surgery should be considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Indications for Procedure
    AHM Obesity Surgery: Bariatric Surgery AUTH: AE-AHMBARIA2015 (AC) Clinical Indications for Procedure • INDICATIONS FOR BARIATRIC SURGERY o Bariatric surgery for morbid obesity is considered medically necessary when ALL of the following are met. Bariatric surgery includes: open or laparoscopic short or long-limb Roux- en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), open or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy, open or laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion (BPD) with or without duodenal switch (DS), or laparoscopic adjustable silicone gastric banding (LASGB) . Clinical must meet either adult criteria or adolescent criteria: 1 or more of the following • For adults age 18 years or older, presence of persistent severe obesity, defined as 1 or more of the following o Body mass index (BMI) (see appendix) exceeding 40 o BMI greater than 35 in conjunction with any 1 or more of the following severe co-morbidities . Clinically significant obstructive sleep apnea (i.e., patient meets the criteria for treatment of obstructive sleep apnea set forth in CPB 004 - Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Adults) . Coronary heart disease with objective documentation (by exercise stress test, radionuclide stress test, pharmacologic stress test, stress echocardiography, CT angiography, coronary angiography, heart failure or prior myocardial infarction) . Medically refractory hypertension (blood pressure greater than 140 mmHg systolic and/or 90 mmHg diastolic despite concurrent use of 3 anti-hypertensive agents of different classes) . Type 2 diabetes mellitus • For adolescents who have completed bone growth (generally age 13 in girls and age 15 in boys), presence of obesity with 1 or more of the following severe comorbidities (check plan benefits) o BMI exceeding 40 with 1 or more of the following serious comorbidities .
    [Show full text]
  • De Novo Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Esophageal Surgery in Bariatrics: a Literature Review and Analysis of the Current Treatment Options
    899 Review Article on Innovations and Updates in Esophageal Surgery Page 1 of 9 De novo gastroesophageal reflux disease esophageal surgery in bariatrics: a literature review and analysis of the current treatment options Rene Aleman, Emanuele Lo Menzo, Samuel Szomstein, Raul J. Rosenthal Department of General Surgery and the Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: R Aleman, E Lo Menzo, RJ Rosenthal; (II) Administrative support: S Szomstein, RJ Rosenthal; (III) Provision of study materials or patients: E Lo Menzo, S Szomstein, RJ Rosenthal; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: R Aleman; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: E Lo Menzo, R Aleman; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Raul J. Rosenthal, MD, FACS, FASMBS. Chairman, Department of General Surgery and Director, Bariatric and Metabolic Institute, Cleveland Clinic Florida, 2950 Cleveland Clinic Blvd, Weston, FL 33331, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: With the exponential increase of worldwide obesity, the number of bariatric surgery (BaS) procedures have equally risen. The surgical management of obesity has been widely established as the standard of care for sustained weight reduction, resolution, and improvement of associated comorbidities. However, BaS itself can have postoperative deleterious effects, including de novo gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and upper gastrointestinal motility disorders. The modified anatomy resulting from BaS, due to either a restrictive or hypoabsorptive component, gives this disorder a multifactorial etiology. The overall management of de novo GERD should focus on three primordial approaches: Non-surgical, endoluminal, and surgical. Even in the absence of de novo GERD following primary or secondary BaS, said disorder should be closely monitored and therapy should be catered in a case-by-case approach.
    [Show full text]
  • Bariatric Surgery – Commercial Medical Policy
    UnitedHealthcare® Commercial Medical Policy Bariatric Surgery Policy Number: 2020T0362FF Effective Date: December 1, 2020 Instructions for Use Table of Contents Page Related Commercial Policies Coverage Rationale ....................................................................... 1 • Minimally Invasive Procedures for Gastroesophageal Documentation Requirements ...................................................... 2 Reflux Disease (GERD) and Achalasia Definitions ...................................................................................... 3 • Obstructive Sleep Apnea Treatment Applicable Codes .......................................................................... 4 • Robotic-Assisted Surgery Policy Description of Services ................................................................. 6 Benefit Considerations .................................................................. 9 Community Plan Policy Clinical Evidence ........................................................................... 9 • Bariatric Surgery U.S. Food and Drug Administration ........................................... 52 Medicare Advantage Coverage Summary References ................................................................................... 53 Policy History/Revision Information ........................................... 64 • Obesity: Treatment of Obesity, Non-Surgical and Instructions for Use ..................................................................... 65 Surgical (Bariatric Surgery) Coverage Rationale See Benefit Considerations
    [Show full text]
  • Commission on Ending Childhood Obesity
    REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON ENDING CHILDHOOD OBESITY REPORT OF THE COMMISSION ON ENDING CHILDHOOD OBESITY WHO Library Cataloguing-in-Publication Data Report of the commission on ending childhood obesity. 1.Pediatric Obesity – prevention and control. 2.Child. 3.Feeding Behavior. 4.Food Habits. 5.Exercise. 6.Diet. 7.Health Promotion. 8.National Health Programs. I.World Health Organization. ISBN 978 92 4 151006 6 (NLM classification: WS 130) © World Health Organization 2016 All rights reserved. Publications of the World Health Organization are available on the WHO website (www.who.int) or can be purchased from WHO Press, World Health Organization, 20 Avenue Appia, 1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland (tel.: +41 22 791 3264; fax: +41 22 791 4857; e-mail: [email protected]). Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications –whether for sale or for non-commercial distribution– should be addressed to WHO Press through the WHO website (www.who.int/about/licensing/copyright_form/en/index.html). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted and dashed lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers’ products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned.
    [Show full text]
  • Office-Based Strategies for the Management of Obesity GOUTHAM RAO, MD, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
    Office-Based Strategies for the Management of Obesity GOUTHAM RAO, MD, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania Roughly two thirds of U.S. adults are overweight or obese. Obesity increases the risk of hypertension, type 2 diabe- tes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, heart disease, pulmonary disease, hepatobiliary disease, cancer, and a number of psy- chosocial complications. Physicians often feel unprepared to handle this important problem. Practical office-based strategies include: (1) making recommendations for assisted self-management, including guidance on popular diets, (2) advising patients about commercial weight-loss programs, (3) advising patients about and prescribing medica- tions, (4) recommending bariatric surgery, and (5) supplementing these strategies with counseling about lifestyle changes using a systematic approach. Family physicians should provide basic information about the effectiveness and safety of popular diets and commercial weight-loss programs, and refer patients to appropriate information sources. Sibutramine and orlistat, the only medications currently approved for the long-term treatment of obesity, should only be prescribed in combination with lifestyle changes. Bariatric surgery is an option for adults with a body mass index of 40 kg per m2 or higher, or for those with a body mass index of 35 kg per m2 or higher who have obesity-related comor- bidities such as type 2 diabetes. The five A’s behavioral counseling paradigm (ask, advise, assess, assist, and arrange) can be used as the basis for a systematic, practical approach to the management of obesity that incorporates evidence for managing common obesity-related behaviors. (Am Fam Physician. 2010;81(12):1449-1455. Copyright © 2010 American Academy of Family Physicians.) ▲ Patient information: besity affects 33.8 percent of eating behaviors or that, conversely, obesity A handout on practical tips U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Obesity Treatment, Several Medications on the NCF Have a Role in Weight Management
    Indian Health Service National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee Formulary Brief: Obesity Pharmacotherapy -August 2018- Background: The National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (NPTC) reviewed the pharmacological treatment of obesity at its Summer 2018 meeting. This topic was last reviewed by the NPTC in February 2014 and no medications were added to the National Core Formulary (NCF) at that time. Although the NCF currently contained no approved medications for obesity treatment, several medications on the NCF have a role in weight management. Following extensive discussion, the NPTC added phentermine to the NCF. Discussion: Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI) of >30 kg/m2, is a complex, chronic disease that is highly prevalent in U.S. adults, affecting nearly 40% of adults in 2015-20161. Lifetime risk of significant health conditions including heart disease, stroke, diabetes, and certain types of cancers is increased by obesity. American Indians and Alaskan Natives (AI/AN) have similar rates of patients classified as overweight (BMI >25kg/m2) as other races/ethnicities but are 50% more likely to have obesity than non-Hispanic whites2. Additionally, AI/AN adolescents are 30% more likely to have obesity when compared with non- Hispanic white counterparts2. Medical costs for patients with obesity are substantially higher per patient ($1429 more reportedly) than in those at normal weight1. The goals for treatment of individuals with overweight and/or obesity are to reduce body weight and improve overall health. Treatment of obesity is multifaceted, requiring a variety of interventions and healthcare providers to be successful and sustainable. Modest to moderate weight loss can result in significant health benefits and life-long, chronic treatment is indicated as weight re-gain commonly occurs following medication discontinuation.
    [Show full text]
  • Management of Obesity the Role of Surgery
    THEME Weight Management of obesity The role of surgery Wendy Brown BACKGROUND Obesity is rapidly becoming Australia’s biggest health care issue. MBBS(Hons), PhD, FRACS, is Senior Lecturer, Center OBJECTIVE for Obesity Research and This article discusses the role of surgery, in particular laparascopic adjustable gastric banding, in the management Education, Department of Surgery, Monash University of obesity. Alfred Hospital, Victoria. DISCUSSION [email protected]. edu.au The acceptability and uptake of surgery as a solution to obesity has, in the past, been low. This is largely due to the risks of bypass and stapling procedures, as well as the lack of long term efficacy. Laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding John B Dixon has, over the past 13 years, proven not only to be safe, but effective both in terms of weight loss and control of the MBBS, PhD, FRACGP, is Head comorbidities associated with obesity. It is currently the most effective solution we have available for patients who suffer of Clinical Research, Centre for Obesity Research and from obesity. Education, Monash University, Victoria. Paul O Brien MD, FRACS, is Director, Center Obesity is rapidly becoming Australia’s biggest health Management for Obesity Research and problem with about 20% of Australians (approximately Education, Monash University, Drug therapy Victoria. 2.6 million) now having a body mass index (BMI) of more than 30.1 These people are at a much higher risk of many Drug therapy has proved to be similarly disappointing with a illnesses when compared to normal weight age matched recent meta-analysis of pharmacological treatments showing controls.
    [Show full text]